|
Every
edition of the Report Card tries to assess whether progress
has been made in improving the situation of Toronto's children.
Yet once again, it is hard to provide a clear, one-sided answer.
Much of the necessary outcome data is not yet available in
terms of the quality and the detail that is required to permit
a conclusive Toronto-based analysis.
On a positive
note, child poverty levels seem to have decreased since 1996.
However, the level is still much higher than reported in 1991.
Further, the decrease did not happen in many parts of the
city. In some neighbourhoods, child poverty has actually increased
since 1996 and a previously reported decline in the number
of children in families depending on social assistance has
recently started inching its way back up.
In the
past few years, there has been increased public awareness
of the importance of children's early years and the need to
provide a wide range of supports and opportunities for children
and families. Based on available research, service planning
and public advocacy, substantial City investments have been
made to child care, recreation, libraries and public health
programs. Increased service levels and enhanced programming
should soon be reflected in improved child outcomes.
The City
of Toronto has continued to show leadership in its commitment
to better serve and support the city's children and families.
Unfortunately, much of the financial commitment has gone to
replacing the funding taken out of the system by the provincial
government rather than making the necessary improvements in
service. The synergy created since 1999 through closer co-operation
among the various sectors that serve Toronto's children and
families is being undermined by the increasing need to direct
all available funds to each sector's "core businesses."
There
is widespread belief that reductions in funding can be countered
by the significant efficiencies that should be gained through
better service coordination and integration. If anything,
programs like the First Duty Project show us that although
integrating different services under one roof improves the
quality of service to individual children and families, very
little duplication or potential for savings actually exist.
Finally,
at the end of 2003, there appears to be reason to look forward
to a better future for Toronto's children as a result of changes
in attitudes at the federal, provincial and municipal levels
of government. Expectations of a more responsive political,
policy and funding environment have risen dramatically. On
the other hand, all levels of government are facing fiscal
realities. How we deal with the gap between expectations and
the ability of governments to deliver the necessary funding
supports will have a long-term impact on the well-being of
all of Toronto - not just its children and families, but also
its neighbourhoods, cultural institutions, employers and businesses.
|