City of Toronto Logo Agenda

Regular



Executive Committee


Meeting No. 40   Contact Patsy Morris, Committee Administrator
Meeting Date Monday, February 1, 2010
  Phone 416-392-9151
Start Time 9:30 AM
  E-mail exc@toronto.ca
Location Committee Room 1, City Hall
  Chair   Mayor David Miller  


Executive Committee

 

Mayor David Miller (Chair)

Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone (Vice-Chair)

Councillor Shelley Carroll

Councillor Janet Davis

 

 

Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker

Councillor Paula Fletcher

Councillor Norm Kelly

Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti

 

 

Councillor Pam McConnell

Councillor Joe Mihevc

Councillor Howard Moscoe

Councillor Kyle Rae

 

Members of Council and Staff: Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended. The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.

 

Special Assistance for Members of the Public: City staff can arrange for special assistance with some advance notice. If you need special assistance, please call (416-392-8485), TTY 416-338-0889 or e-mail ( exc@toronto.ca ).

 

Closed Meeting Requirements: If the Executive Committee wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of the committee must make a motion to do so and give the reason why

the Committee has to meet privately. (City of Toronto Act, 2006)

 

Notice to People Writing or making presentations to the Executive Committee: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

 

 

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City's website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it - such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address - available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

The City videotapes committee and community council meetings.  If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be videotaping you and City staff may make the video tapes available to the public.

 

If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or by calling 416-392-8485.

 

Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act.

 

Confirmation of Minutes - January 4, 2010

 

Speakers/Presentations - A complete list will be distributed at the meeting.

 

Communications/Reports

 

EX40.1

ACTION 

 

 

Ward: All 

Report on a Protocol for Member Involvement in Other Wards
Origin
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Integrity Commissioner
Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that Council:

 

1.         Adopt the Protocol for Member Involvement in Other Wards, attached as Appendix 1.

Summary

On September 28, 2005, Council adopted a report from the former Integrity Commissioner recommending that Council reaffirm the principle that a Member of Council may intervene on a ward matter in another Member’s ward, that the City Manager in consultation with the Integrity Commissioner prepare a Protocol for Council on Members of Council intervening on a ward matter in another Member’s ward, and amendments to the Code of Conduct for Members of Council reflecting the Protocol’s standards for intervention on a ward matter in another Member’s ward.

 

This report completes Council’s direction by proposing a Protocol that is aligned with the work done by the former Integrity Commissioner. The Code of Conduct for Members of Council does not require amendment at this time, because it includes a requirement that Members of Council follow protocols and policies put in place by Council.

 

The City Manager’s office has been consulted and is content that the proposed Protocol be brought to Council by the Integrity Commissioner.

 

 

Financial Impact

This report will have no financial impact.

Background Information
Report on a Protocol for Member Involvement in Other Wards
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26716.pdf)

Appendix 1 - lProtocol for Member Involvement in Other Wards
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26717.pdf)

Appendix 2 - Report to Council by former Integrity Commissioner David Mullan on Involvement of Members in Matters Arising in Other Members' Wards, September 15, 2005
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26718.pdf)

Appendix 3 - 2004 Staff Protocol for Member Requests
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26719.pdf)


EX40.2

ACTION 

 

 

Ward: All 

Report on Amending the Complaint Protocol about Election Year Complaints in Response to Changes to the Municipal Election Act 1996
Origin
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Integrity Commissioner
Recommendations

 The Integrity Commissioner recommends that Council:

 

1.         Amend the Code of Conduct Complaint Protocol for Members of Council, Part B: FORMAL COMPLAINT PROCEDURE, section 1(6) as follows:

 

In a municipal election year, a code of conduct complaint respecting a member who is seeking re-election may not be filed with the City Clerk during the period starting on Civic Monday (August 1 in 2010) and ending when a new City Council is deemed organized under section 185 of the City of Toronto Act 2006.

 

 

Summary

The current Code of Conduct Complaint Protocol for Members of Council, (“the Complaint Protocol”) does not permit formal complaints to be made to the Integrity Commissioner between Labour Day of an election year and the date that the new City Council is organized.

 

On December 15, 2009, the Province passed Bill 212, Good Government Act, which   amended the Municipal Elections Act 2006 and moved Election Day up to October 25, 2010. In anticipation of the passage of this Bill, City Council changed the Committee and Council meeting schedule for Fall 2010. The last regular City Council meeting before Election Day will now be held in August, instead of at the end of September as formerly planned.

 

In keeping with the new dates, this report recommends amending the Complaint Protocol and changing the date in an election year after which no formal complaints can be made from Labour Day to Civic Monday (August 1 in 2010).

 

 

Financial Impact

This report will have no financial impact.

Background Information
Report on Amending the Complaint Protocol about Election Year Complaints in Response to Changes to the Municipal Elections Act 1996
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26720.pdf)


EX40.3

ACTION 

 

 

Ward: All 

Follow-up Report to Requests from Council re: 2010 Municipal Election
Origin
(January 18, 2010) Report from the City Solicitor and the City Clerk
Recommendations

The City Solicitor and City Clerk recommend that City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

On November 24, 2009, Executive Committee considered several reports from the City Clerk regarding the 2010 municipal election.  These same reports were before City Council on December 2, 2009.   At those meetings a number of additional reports were requested for the February 1, 2010 meeting of Executive Committee.   This report is a consolidated response to the requests.

Financial Impact

There are no financial implications arising from approval to receive this report.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial implications. 

Background Information
Follow-up Report to Requests from Council re: 2010 Municipal Election
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26721.pdf)


EX40.4

Information 

 

 

Ward: All 

Multi-Residential Apartment Building Audit Program
Origin
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards
Summary

This report provides an overview of the Multi-residential Apartment Building (“MRAB”) Audit Program that was launched on December 1, 2008, including an account of its key achievements, its challenges and issues, and enhancements conducted along the way.  It also addresses the direction from the Licensing and Standards Committee with respect to the Ward 17 pilot project at Symington Place and Pelham Park Gardens.

 

Municipal Licensing and Standards will expand the program in 2010 by auditing at least 200 buildings.  This increase will come on top of the ongoing follow-up on outstanding work and monitoring of long term rehabilitation at many of the 187 buildings audited in 2009.  Despite this increase in audit activity, the team will only be increased through the redeployment of two officers.  Much of the additional work will therefore be absorbed by achieving greater efficiencies through operational enhancements implemented on the basis of learning gained in the first year of the program.

 

Municipal Licensing and Standards will also be introducing a number of program enhancements, on the one hand making it easier for tenants to have property standards and related issues addressed more effectively and efficiently, and on the other providing landlords with more specific and timely information to help them identify, address, and get resolution to issues more expeditiously.

 

This report was prepared in consultation with Shelter Support and Housing Administration, Toronto Public Health, Toronto Fire Services, and Legal Services.  Many of the program enhancements were developed after meeting with both landlord and tenant groups in a variety of forums.

 

Financial Impact

 There are no financial implications arising from the recommendations of this report beyond those in the current budget.

 

Background Information
Multi-Residential Apartment Building Audit Program
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26722.pdf)


EX40.5

ACTION 

 

 

Ward: All 

2009-2010 Recipients of City of Toronto Scholarships at the University of Toronto
Origin
(January 13, 2010) Report from the City Manager
Recommendations

The City Manager recommends that City Council extend congratulations to the following recipients of City of Toronto Scholarships at the University of Toronto:

 

Sadia Mahmood: Graduate Scholarship in Women’s Studies

Shannon Black: Undergraduate Scholarship in Women’s Studies

Melissa James: Scholarship in Aboriginal Health

Mary Ann Shoefly-Devries: Scholarship in Aboriginal Health

Amreen Moledina: Graduate Scholarship for Women in Mathematics.

            Kathy-Anne Morales: Undergraduate Scholarship in Community Health Nursing

            Winnie Wai Ling Sun: Graduate Scholarship in Community Health Nursing.

 

Summary

This report advises Council that the University of Toronto has selected the 2009-2010 recipients of City of Toronto scholarships. 

 

Toronto City Council established a series of scholarships at the University of Toronto starting in 1984 with the Queen Elizabeth II Sesquicentennial Scholarship in Community Health Nursing. In 1985 the undergraduate scholarship in Women’s Studies was established.  Two aboriginal health scholarships were established in 1989. In 1997,  graduate scholarships for Women in Mathematics, Women’s Studies and Community Health Nursing were established

Financial Impact

There is no financial impact arising from this report.  In 1997, the City of Toronto transferred endowment funds to the University of Toronto to support these awards in perpetuity.  

Background Information
2009-2010 Recipients of City of Toronto Scholarships at the University of Toronto
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26723.pdf)


EX40.6

ACTION 

 

 

Ward: All 

Donation of Ambulances
Origin
(January 18, 2010) Report from the City Manager
Recommendations

The City Manager recommends that:

 

1.         Council not proceed with the December 4, 2009 proposal entitled “Donation of Ambulances to El Salvador”.

Summary

At its meeting on January 4, 2010, the Executive Committee requested staff to report on a proposal by Councillors Mihevc, Moscoe, Fletcher and Vaughan to donate to El Salvador one ambulance per year for the next four years and to provide right of first refusal to the Caravan of Hope for up to 13 additional retired EMS vehicles per year for four years, to be purchased at a pre-determined price.

 

This report recommends that Council not proceed with the proposal, outlines the policy and operational impacts of the proposal and the current status of the Toronto-Soyapango partnership, part of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Technical Partnership Program which will formally end in 2010.

Financial Impact

There are no financial implications as a result of this report’s recommendations. However, if Council decides to support the proposal for an annual donation of ambulances to El Salvador it would result in lost auction revenue for Emergency Medical Services (EMS). The cost in 2010 would be between $9,200 and $11,000; and over four years approximately $40,000.  EMS relies on its auction revenue to support the purchase of new ambulances.  EMS has committed to reducing its Fleet Reserve Account by $250,000 gross in 2010 and $500,000 in 2011 and beyond, in order to meet budgetary constraints. To achieve these reductions, EMS will defer some vehicle purchases planned for 2010, and will lengthen its fleet replacement cycle starting in 2011 (by purchasing fewer new ambulances each year). It may have fewer ambulances for other uses, relying more on auction revenues.

Background Information
Donation of Ambulances
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26724.pdf)


EX40.7

ACTION 

 

 

Ward: All 

Update and Revisions to the Eco-Roof Incentive Program
Origin
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Director, Toronto Environment Office
Recommendations

The Director of the Toronto Environment Office recommends that:

 

1.                  City Council adopt the revised terms of reference set out in Appendix III to this report, to be applied as the selection criteria for the Eco-Roof Incentive Program;

 

2.                  The Director of the Toronto Environment Office be authorized to make future refinements to the Eco-Roof Incentive Program and amendments to the terms of reference set out in Appendix III; and

 

3.                  Any refinements to the Eco-Roof Incentive Program and amendments to the terms of reference set out in Appendix III be reported, along with an update on the status of the program, in an annual report to the Executive Committee.

 

Summary

The purpose of the Eco-Roof Incentive Program, launched in March of 2009, is to provide incentives to commercial, industrial and institutional (ICI) property owners so that Toronto’s building stock becomes more sustainable and better adapted to climate change. The program implements directions from the City’s Climate Change Action Plan and complements the City’s Green Roof Bylaw and the Green Standard by encouraging owners of existing buildings to retrofit their roof space. The Eco-Roof Program provides financial incentives towards the construction of green roofs that support vegetation and cool roofs that reflect the sun’s thermal energy.

 

In 2009, 49 Eco-Roof applications were received, 42 of which were approved for funding.  A total of 66,069 square meters of green and cool roof area was approved with a combined funding allocation of $762,089.00.

 

The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the status of the Eco- Roof Incentive Program and to provide a review of proposed revisions to the program terms of reference prior to its next funding round March 1, 2010. Revisions proposed to the Eco-Roof Incentive Program will ensure the program is consistent with the standards set in the Green Roof Bylaw and the Green Toronto Standard and will address issues that arose in the first year in criteria for eligibility, specifications and protocols for verification.

 

 

 

Financial Impact

The recommendations of this report have no financial impact beyond what has already been approved in the current year’s budget.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

 

Background Information
Update and Revisions to the Eco-Roof Incentive Program
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26725.pdf)


EX40.8

Information 

 

 

Ward: All 

Applications to FCM Green Municipal Fund
Origin
(January 18, 2010) Report from the City Manager
Summary

This report provides information on recent applications from Toronto to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) Green Municipal Fund.

Financial Impact

Making application to FCM does not, in itself, commit the City or its agencies to undertake any financial obligations.  The respective program areas will report back on any budget adjustments required because of successful applications for grants and/or low-interest loans as described in this Report.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

 

 

 

Background Information
Applications to FCM Green Municipal Fund
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26726.pdf)


EX40.9

ACTION 

 

 

Ward: All 

Joint Management of Move Ontario Trust's Investment Portfolio between the City and the Region of York
Origin
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
Recommendations

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommends that:

 

1          Corporate Finance Division staff be authorized to manage, jointly with the appropriate staff from the Region of York, the investment portfolio of the Move Ontario Trust.

 

2.         The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer be authorized to negotiate and execute the agreements required with the Region of York and the Move Ontario Trust to implement Recommendation 1, and address the issues as set out in this report on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the City Solicitor.

 

3          Investment management fees received by the City from the MOT be allocated to the City’s non-program interest/investment earnings account.

Summary

This report requests authority to jointly manage the fixed income investment portfolio of the Move Ontario Trust (“MOT”) with the Region of York.

Financial Impact

The proposed investment management fees of $225,000 per year plus 1.6 basis points (0.016%) of the average value of the portfolio will be paid to the City and the Region by the Move Ontario Trust.  The proposed joint management of the portfolio is estimated to save the MOT approximately $561,000 for 2010 compared with the estimated cost of an external investment manager while providing the City with an estimated fee of $184,500.

 

The estimated savings to the MOT will be realized by the City of Toronto and Region of York’s capital accounts related to the construction of the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension as they are the only beneficiaries of the MOT.

Background Information
Joint Management of Move Ontario Trustýs Investment Portfolio between the City and the Region of York
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26728.pdf)


EX40.10

ACTION 

 

 

Ward: All 

Monetization of the Toronto Hydro Promissory Note
Origin
(January 19, 2010) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
Recommendations

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommends that:

 

1.         Council approve the sale of the Toronto Hydro Promissory Note to the City’s debt issuance syndicate managers, RBC Dominion, CIBC Capital Markets and Scotia Capital who will place the Note(s) with investors.

 

2.         The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer be authorized to negotiate the terms for the sale of the Toronto Hydro Promissory Note with the City’s debt issuance syndicate managers (the “Sales Agreement”), including the pricing of the Note and commission payable based upon current interest rates and capital market conditions prevailing at the time of the sale, and to enter into the Sales Agreement on behalf of the City.

 

3.         The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer be authorized to assign the Toronto Hydro Promissory Note and to sign any necessary documents to give effect to the assignment, on behalf of the Holder.

 

4.         The City obtain a fairness opinion from a qualified third-party financial expert stating that the City has received a fair and equitable market price for the Note with the fee being deducted from the gross proceeds of the monetization.

 

5.         The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer be authorized to transfer funds from the Strategic Infrastructure Partnership Reserve Fund (XR1714) during 2010 to the Interest Income – Hydro Note Account in the Non-Program budget from the proceeds of the sale of the Note, equal to the difference between the interest payments payable from the Note and $29,946,055.67 that has been included in the 2010 preliminary operating budget.

 

6.         Council approve the withdrawal of $600 million from the Strategic Infrastructure Partnership Reserve Fund during 2010 and the deposit of the $600 million into the City Sinking Fund to be used to prepay the Sinking Fund debentures identified in Appendix A.

 

7.         Council request the Sinking Fund Committee to retire or pay down the balances remaining in the outstanding debentures as listed in Appendix A using the proceeds received from the Note monetization.

 

8.         Council approve the repeal of the borrowing by-laws identified in Appendix A at such time as the following conditions have been met:

 

a.           Recommendation 6 has been implemented; and

b.           the City’s external auditor has audited the sinking fund balance and has in writing confirmed to the DCM/CFO that the balance, including any estimated revenue, is or will be sufficient to entirely repay all or part of the sinking fund debt for which the Sinking Fund was established as identified in Appendix A of this report on the date or dates the principal on such debt becomes due.

 

9.         The City Solicitor be authorized to introduce bills to Council to give effect to Recommendation 8 at such time as the conditions set out in Recommendation 6 have been met.

 

Summary

 This report recommends the sale of the Toronto Hydro Promissory Note (“Note”) to the City’s debt issuance syndicate who will place the Note with investors and provide the City with the net proceeds of the sale.  This action results from Council’s approval on December 8, 2009 of a debt restructuring strategy as part of the adopted 2010-2019 Capital Budget and Plan.

Financial Impact

When the Note is sold, the City will receive proceeds of approximately $531 million, made up of $490 million from the principal portion of the Note and an estimated premium of $41.3 million based upon current interest rates and capital market conditions and assuming that the transaction closes at the end of February, 2010. The actual proceeds and premium will be determined at the time that the Note is placed with investors, based upon the prevailing capital market rates.  The funds will be placed in the Strategic Infrastructure Partnership Reserve Fund.

 

Funds totalling $600 million will be transferred from the Reserve Fund to the City’s Sinking Funds, from the proceeds of the sale of the Note, along with prior principal payments on the Note of $490 million received from Toronto Hydro in 2007 and 2009.  The balance of the funds in the Reserve Fund have been or will be applied to capital projects as approved as part of the annual capital budget and plan, such as environmental projects and past Waterfront capital expenditures.

 

The City is scheduled to receive $29.9 million in interest payments from the Promissory Note in 2010.  The recommendations in this report will ensure that this amount is protected in the Operating Budget, regardless of the actual timing of the sale of the Note as up to $29.9 million of the premium generated from the Note monetization will be used to offset the amount of interest income that will not be received after the Note is sold.  The premium is, in effect, a gain on the sale of the investment in the Note, so it is appropriate to recognize a portion of the gain as income in the operating budget.

 

Background Information
Monetization of the Toronto Hydro Promissory Note
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26729.pdf)


EX40.11

ACTION 

 

 

Ward: 1 

Water Connection Funding for the Thackeray Park Cricket Pitch
Origin
(January 15, 2010) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Richard Butts
Recommendations

The Deputy City Manager & Chief Financial Officer and Deputy City Manager Richard Butts, recommend that:

 

1.                  Council approve a one-time allocation of $350,000 from the year-end 2009 Toronto Water Operating Budget surplus to fund Toronto Water's cost of the water and sewer service connection to the Thackeray Park cricket grounds.

 

2.                  The Deputy City Manager & Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the appropriate City Divisions, be directed to report back to Executive Committee on a policy for development-related fee rebates/grants for non-profit organizations.

 

Summary

This report recommends one-time allocation of $350,000 from the year-end 2009 Toronto Water Operating budget surplus to cover Toronto Water’s cost for the water connection to service the Thackeray Park Cricket Pitch.  Existing protocol is that water service connections be installed by the City at the expense of the owner.  Thackeray Park cricket pitch will provide numerous social and recreational benefits to the community and at-risk youth groups.  The project has gained momentum and community stakeholders have secured additional funding towards the completion of the Park. 

Financial Impact

Approval of the recommendations contained in this report will require allocation of $350,000 from the year-end 2009 Toronto Water Operating Budget surplus, to be used to cover Toronto Water’s cost for the water connection to service the Thackeray Park Cricket Pitch. 

Background Information
Water Connection Funding for the Thackeray Park Cricket Pitch
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26730.pdf)


EX40.12

Information 

 

 

Ward: All 

Revenue Collected from Hydro Corridor Lands and Payments for Leasing These Lands by the City and its ABC's
Origin
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Treasurer
Summary

This report provides information on the amount of revenue collected by the City from lands used as hydro corridors, and payments made for leasing these lands by the City and its Agencies, Boards and Commissions (ABCs) for providing municipal services.

Financial Impact

There are no financial implications from this report.

Background Information
Revenue Collected from Hydro Corridor Lands and Payments for leasing these lands by the City and its ABCs
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26731.pdf)


EX40.13

Information 

 

 

Ward: All 

Toronto 175 Anniversary Celebrations
Origin
(December 31, 2009) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development, Culture and Tourism
Summary

Toronto 175 was adopted by City Council on September 24 and 25, 2008.

http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2008/cc/decisions/2008-09-24-cc24-dd.pdf

 

City Council authorized the Toronto 175 Steering Committee, led by Deputy Mayor Joe Pantalone, in collaboration with Cultural Services, Protocol, Toronto Office of Partnerships, Toronto Arts Council, Tourism Toronto and others, to develop themes, plans, programming and events that recognized, as well as commemorated this important milestone.  March 6, 2009, marked the anniversary of the incorporation of the City of Toronto with festivities concluding on December 31, 2009.

 

 

-           Theme:  The Toronto 175 anniversary themes were, “Heritage, Unity and Diversity”

-           Plan:  The plan was to develop successful outreach strategies with large and small organizations promoting civic engagement and civic pride.

-           Program: The goals were to enhance programming and special events for current City of Toronto initiatives and venues under the umbrella of Toronto 175.

-           Events: The objectives of the Toronto 175 Steering Committee was to develop strategies with external organizations that highlighted Toronto 175, either through partnerships to produce events or to cross promote partnership events under the banner of the 175th anniversary year.

 

 

Toronto 175 anniversary celebrations promoted a positive profile for Toronto for both residents and tourists.  The celebrations and partnerships linked the past, the present and future of Toronto within one anniversary year.  Over 700,000 members of the public engaged in celebrations that honoured Toronto’s heritage, unity and diversity.  Media coverage during partnerships and events were extensive.  The Toronto 175 Brand ID appeared on most marketing materials produced by the City of Toronto, as well as promotional materials created by Toronto 175 partners.  In 2009 Design Services produced approximately 1,700 promotional materials for the City of Toronto. As Toronto 175 concludes many lessons have been learned.  Toronto has grown into a world class city that is recognized around the world for its quality of life, its environmental stewardship and its multiculturalism. Toronto residents of all ages are eager to share their experiences as well as celebrate their diversity and unite with their fellow Torontonians.

 

Financial Impact

The one-time budget increase of $0.230 million and .4 positions in 2009 for the 175th Anniversary of the City of Toronto have been reversed in the 2010 Operating Budget.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

 

 

 

Background Information
Toronto 175 Anniversary Celebrations
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26732.pdf)


EX40.14

ACTION 

 

 

Ward: All 

Sustainable Energy Funds - Private Sector Pilot Program
Origin
(January 20, 2010) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer
Recommendations

The Chief Corporate Officer recommends that:

 

1.         The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer in consultation with the Chief Corporate Officer, develop and implement eligibility criteria, consistent with the criteria currently in place with necessary modifications, to address the characteristics of the Multi-family Residential sector, for the use of Sustainable Energy Funds for privately owned buildings that are undertaking comprehensive retrofits leading to significant energy savings and green house gas emission reductions.

 

2.         Total repayable loans to privately owned multi-family apartment sector participants be limited to totals of $5 Million from the Toronto Energy Conservation Fund and $5 Million from the Toronto Green Energy Fund for an overall total of $10 Million, until December 31, 2012.

 

3.         The purpose of the Toronto Green Energy Reserve Fund be amended to include its use as a revolving fund to provide support for renewable energy installations and to accommodate expansion of eligibility criteria to include privately owned multi-family residential buildings (4 stories or greater and a minimum footprint of 600 square metres) that are undertaking comprehensive retrofit projects.

 

4.         The purpose of the Toronto Energy Conservation Reserve Fund be amended to include its use as a revolving loan fund to provide support for energy conservation initiatives and to accommodate expansion of eligibility criteria to include privately owned multi-family residential buildings (4 stories or greater and a minimum footprint of 600 square metres)  that are undertaking comprehensive retrofit projects.

 

5.         Municipal Code 227 (Reserves and Reserve Funds) be amended by the foregoing Recommendations #3 and #4 above.

 

6.         Prior to December 31, 2012, the Chief Corporate Officer report back on the findings and outcome of the pilot program and recommendations regarding further private sector participation in the Sustainable Energy Fund Program.

 

7.         The Chief Corporate Officer report on the implications for including carbon credit and conservation demand management funding sources as transfers to and/or conditions of participation in the Sustainable Energy Fund program.

 

8.         The appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, and that leave be granted for the introduction of any necessary bills in Council to give effect thereto.

Summary

This report recommends that up to $10 million of the Sustainable Energy Funds be eligible for revolving loan financing of privately owned multi-family residential buildings, which undertake comprehensive retrofit strategies on a pilot basis to December 31, 2012. This sector has significant potential to undertake building retrofits and achieve energy savings and green house gas reductions.  The work undertaken will also have the beneficial impact of creating jobs, supporting green industry innovation and protecting residents from escalating energy costs. Consistent with current Sustainable Energy Fund requirements, eligibility criteria for privately owned multi-family residential buildings will be based on sound financial practices and will ensure funds are used to achieve sustainability goals and objectives, by supporting projects that provide comprehensive and significant environmental performance improvements. 

 

The loans through the revolving loan arrangement as set out in the Sustainable Energy Fund Program will have no capital or operating budget impact.

 

 

Financial Impact

No changes would be required to the funding available in the 2010-2019 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan for Sustainable Energy.  The program is fully funded from the Strategic Infrastructure Reserve Fund.

 

The loans through the revolving loan arrangement as set out in the Sustainable Energy Fund Program will have no capital or operating budget impact.

 

Considering the total Sustainable Energy Funds allocation of $62 Million, it is recommended that total repayable loan amounts to privately owned building participants be limited to an aggregate of $5 Million from the Toronto Energy Conservation Fund and $5 Million from the Toronto Green Energy Fund for a total of $10 Million.  These applications would be subject to the same permitted loan amount range of a minimum of $50,000 to a maximum of $1,000,000, at zero interest for up to 49% of eligible project costs that are currently applied to Sustainable Energy Fund applications.  Municipal Code 227 (Reserves and Reserve Funds) will be amended accordingly.  The Sustainable Energy Fund Eligibility Criteria amended to reflect the foregoing, is included in Appendix 1, attached.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

Background Information
Sustainable Energy Funds- Private Sector Pilot Program
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26736.pdf)


EX40.15

Information 

 

 

Ward: All 

A Summary of the City's Donation Activity for the 2008 Fiscal Year
Origin
(January 18, 2010) Report from the Toronto Office of Partnerships
Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide an annual summary of the City’s donation activity as required by section 4.15 of the Policy on Donations to the City for Community Benefits. 

 

For the 2008 fiscal year, more than 50 City Programs (divisions as well as some agencies, boards and commissions) received over 6,150 donations with a total value of over $1.9 million. Donations were made by both individuals and organizations and came in largely from local areas of the City, but also from other parts of the province, the country and even internationally.

 

It is important to note that the 2008 summary only pertains to donations for which tax receipts were issued by the City itself. Programs that issue their own tax receipts, such as the Toronto Public Libraries and the Toronto Zoo, are not included in this summary. Moreover, since the summary is based solely on tax-receiptable donations, the actual value of contributions to the City is likely higher.

 

The Toronto Office of Partnership will report back on the City’s 2009 donation activity in the Fall of 2010.

 

 

Financial Impact

There are no financial implications arising from this report.   

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

 

Background Information
A Summary of the City's Donation Activity for the 2008 Fiscal Year
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26738.pdf)


EX40.16

ACTION 

 

 

 

Proposed Biogas Facility at the Toronto Zoo
Origin
(January 9, 2010) Report from the Acting Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Zoo
Recommendations

 The Board of Management recommends approval for the construction of a Biogas Facility at the Toronto Zoo.

Summary

 This report recommends approval for the construction of a Biogas Facility at the Toronto Zoo.  Approval is being sought in accordance with the Tripartite Agreement between the Toronto Zoo, the City of Toronto and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.  The goal of the proposed project is to generate clean renewable energy from organic “waste” (e.g. fuel), to meet the Zoo’s goal of being carbon neutral, and to visually demonstrate the benefits of biogas technology as an educational tool.

Financial Impact

There is no capital impact related to this decision.  It is anticipated that there will be a donation component and a cost offset from energy provided to the Toronto Zoo from the biogas operator, subject to the RFP process and related negotiations with the successful proponent.  It is not possible to quantify the amount of the benefit at this time.

 

Background Information
Proposed Biogas Facility at the Toronto Zoo
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-26733.pdf)