City of Toronto Logo Contents

Considered by City Council on
August 25, 2010
August 26, 2010
August 27, 2010



Public Works and Infrastructure Committee


Meeting No. 35   Contact Candy Davidovits, Committee Administrator
Meeting Date Wednesday, August 18, 2010
  Phone 416-392-8032
Start Time 9:30 AM
  E-mail pwic@toronto.ca
Location Committee Room 1, City Hall
  Chair   Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker  

Item  

PW35.4 Amendment to Purchase Order Nos. 6025317 and 6025318 - Request for Proposal No. 9117-07-7283 - Highland Creek Treatment Plant - Implementation of Odour Control Upgrades (Ward: 44)  

PW35.5 Amendment to Purchase Order No. 6012548 - Humber Treatment Plant - Upgrade of Waste Activated Sludge Thickening Facility (Ward: 5)  

PW35.7 Agreements with Railway Companies, Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge, Contract No. 10FS-34S (Ward: 19)  

PW35.10 Garbage Collection - For Tenants in Residential Units Above Commercial (RUAC) Properties (Ward: All)  

PW35.11 F. G. Gardiner Expressway and Don Valley Parkway Closure - Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario - 2011, 2012 and 2013 "Ride for Heart" Event  

PW35.12 Gardiner Expressway York/Bay/Yonge Interchange Reconfiguration - Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (Ward: 20, 28)  

PW35.13 Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment Annual Compliance Reports 2009 (Ward: 32)  

PW35.14 Electronic Policing Pilot Project - Pharmacy Avenue (Ward: 40)  

PW35.16 Request for Reimbursement of Cost of Installing a Sewer Clean-out at 67 Kingswood Road (Ward: 32)  



City of Toronto Logo Committee Report

Considered by City Council on
August 25, 2010
August 26, 2010
August 27, 2010



Public Works and Infrastructure Committee



PW35.4

 

Adopted 

 

Ward: 44 

Amendment to Purchase Order Nos. 6025317 and 6025318 - Request for Proposal No. 9117-07-7283 - Highland Creek Treatment Plant - Implementation of Odour Control Upgrades
City Council Decision

City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in the amount of $1,554,405.37, net of HST Recoveries to CWW045-01 Odour Control Upgrades – Phase 1 Engineering from CWW036-05 Transformers and Switchgear as indicated in the table contained in the Financial Impact section of the report (July 28, 2010) from the Executive Director, Technical Services, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management.

 

2.         City Council grant authority to amend Purchase Order No. 6025317 for the provision of professional engineering services during design related to the Highland Creek Treatment Plant – Implementation of Odour Control Upgrades with AECOM Canada Ltd. by an additional amount of $938,441.00, net of all applicable taxes and charges ($954,957.56, net of HST Recoveries), revising the current contract value from $3,632,837.33 to $4,571,278.33 net of all applicable taxes and charges.

 

3.         City Council grant authority to amend Purchase Order No. 6025318 for the provision of general office administration and site supervision services during construction related to the Highland Creek Treatment Plant – Implementation of Odour Control Upgrades with AECOM Canada Ltd. by an additional amount of $589,080.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($599,447.81, net of HST Recoveries), revising the current contract value from $1,211,188.71 to $1,800,268.71 net of all applicable taxes and charges.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in the amount of $1,554,405.37, net of HST Recoveries to CWW045-01 Odour Control Upgrades – Phase 1 Engineering from CWW036-05 Transformers and Switchgear as indicated in the table contained in the Financial Impact section of the report (July 28, 2010) from the Executive Director, Technical Services, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management.

 

2.         City Council grant authority to amend Purchase Order No. 6025317 for the provision of professional engineering services during design related to the Highland Creek Treatment Plant – Implementation of Odour Control Upgrades with AECOM Canada Ltd. by an additional amount of $938,441.00, net of all applicable taxes and charges ($954,957.56, net of HST Recoveries), revising the current contract value from $3,632,837.33 to $4,571,278.33 net of all applicable taxes and charges.

 

3.         City Council grant authority to amend Purchase Order No. 6025318 for the provision of general office administration and site supervision services during construction related to the Highland Creek Treatment Plant – Implementation of Odour Control Upgrades with AECOM Canada Ltd. by an additional amount of $589,080.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($599,447.81, net of HST Recoveries), revising the current contract value from $1,211,188.71 to $1,800,268.71 net of all applicable taxes and charges.

Origin
(July 28, 2010) Report from Executive Director, Technical Services, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management
Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority to:  (a) amend Purchase Order No. 6025317 for the provision of professional engineering services during design related to the Highland Creek Treatment Plant – Implementation of Odour Control Upgrades with AECOM Canada Ltd., and (b) amend Purchase Order No. 6025318 for the provision of general office administration and site supervision services during construction related to the Highland Creek Treatment Plant – Implementation of Odour Control Upgrades with AECOM Canada Ltd.   The total amount being requested is $1,527,521.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($1,554,405.37, net of HST Recoveries) as outlined in recommendations 2 and 3 below.

 

The request for the Purchase Order amendments is to accommodate an increase in scope to provide an entirely new Grit Building as a result of a cost/benefit analysis being undertaken.  The new building will provide enhanced odour collection and treatment thereby minimizing odours to the neighbouring community, and will address requirements of the Ministry of the Environment related to odour control reductions to facilitate regulatory compliance.

Background Information (Committee)
PW35.4-Amendment to Purchase Order Nos. 6025317 and 6025318 - Request for Proposal No. 9117-07-7283 - Highland Creek Treatment Plant - Implementation of Odour Control Upgrades - Staff Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32434.pdf)


PW35.5

 

Adopted 

 

Ward: 5 

Amendment to Purchase Order No. 6012548 - Humber Treatment Plant - Upgrade of Waste Activated Sludge Thickening Facility
City Council Decision

City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in the amount of $673,794.17 net of GST and HST recoveries to CWW008-44 from CWW049-04 – Digester Cleaning and upgrades as indicated in the table contained in the Financial Impact section of the report (July 28, 2010) from the Executive Director, Technical Services, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management.

 

2.         City Council grant authority to amend Purchase Order No. 6012548 for professional services with MacViro Consultants Inc., a Division of Genivar Ontario Inc. for the provision of general office administration and site supervision services during construction by an additional amount of $665,015.96 net of all taxes ($673,794.17 net of GST and HST Recoveries).

————
Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in the amount of $673,794.17 net of GST and HST recoveries to CWW008-44 from CWW049-04 – Digester Cleaning and upgrades as indicated in the table contained in the Financial Impact section of the report (July 28, 2010) from the Executive Director, Technical Services, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management.

 

2.         City Council grant authority to amend Purchase Order No. 6012548 for professional services with MacViro Consultants Inc., a Division of Genivar Ontario Inc. for the provision of general office administration and site supervision services during construction by an additional amount of $665,015.96 net of all taxes ($673,794.17 net of GST and HST Recoveries).

Origin
(July 28, 2010) Report from Executive Director, Technical Services, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management
Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority to amend Purchase Order No. 6012548 for professional engineering services during construction related to the Humber Treatment Plant – upgrade of waste activated sludge thickening facility.  The total amount being requested is $665,015.96 net of all taxes ($673,794.17 net of GST and HST Recoveries) increasing the current contract value from $1,256,081.04 to $1,921,097.00 net of all taxes ($1,929,875.21 net of GST and HST Recoveries).

 

A portion of the extra work requested in this report was completed prior to the HST implementation date of July 1, 2010.  Therefore, GST and HST recoveries are applicable.

 

This increase is as a result of additional engineering contract administration services during construction related to delays caused by unforeseen site conditions requiring additional work and labour disruptions from industry and municipal work stoppages.

Background Information (Committee)
PW35.5-Amendment to Purchase Order No. 6012548 - Humber Treatment Plant - Upgrade of Waste Activated Sludge Thickening Facility - Staff Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32435.pdf)


PW35.7

 

Amended 

 

Ward: 19 

Agreements with Railway Companies, Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge, Contract No. 10FS-34S
City Council Decision

City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to negotiate and enter into agreements, including rail crossing agreements, with property owners and/or affected railway companies, as required to permit the construction, maintenance and use of the Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge, Contract 10FS-34S, on terms acceptable to the Executive Director of Technical Services and the Acting Director of Waterfront Secretariat, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor, and that the Executive Director of Technical Services be authorized to execute any required agreements on behalf of the City.

 

2.         City Council direct that the price paid to the railways for access across their property be properly reflective of the fact that:

 

a.         the bridge is being constructed for public purposes; and

 

b.         the railways do not pay full property taxes for this property.

 

3.         City Council grant authority to the City Solicitor, in the event that acceptable crossing agreements cannot be negotiated, to undertake an application to the Canadian Transportation Agency under the Canadian Transportation Act, to obtain permission from the Agency for the construction, use and future maintenance of the Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to negotiate and enter into agreements, including rail crossing agreements, with property owners and/or affected railway companies, as required to permit the construction, maintenance and use of the Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge, Contract 10FS-34S, on terms acceptable to the Executive Director of Technical Services and the Acting Director of Waterfront Secretariat, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor, and that the Executive Director of Technical Services be authorized to execute any required agreements on behalf of the City.

 

2.         City Council grant authority to the City Solicitor, in the event that acceptable crossing agreements cannot be negotiated, to undertake an application to the Canadian Transportation Agency under the Canadian Transportation Act, to obtain permission from the Agency for the construction, use and future maintenance of the Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge.

Origin
(August 3, 2010) Report from Executive Director, Technical Services
Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend that authority be granted to negotiate and execute agreements with rail companies affected by the construction of the Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge.

 

An expedited completion of the required agreements is necessary to facilitate the construction of the Fort York pedestrian/cycle bridge in time for the War of 1812 Bicentennial Celebration in 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
PW35.7-Agreements with Railway Companies, Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge, Contract No. 10FS-34S - Staff Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32439.pdf)


PW35.10

 

Adopted 

 

Ward: All 

Garbage Collection - For Tenants in Residential Units Above Commercial (RUAC) Properties
City Council Decision

City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to investigate Option 4 contained in the report (July 26, 2010) from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by mid-2011 on implementation.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to develop a database identifying:

 

a.         the number and identification of residential units and tenants above commercial establishments;

 

b.         how waste management services are offered; and

 

c.         challenges and solutions for providing bag tags.

 

3.         City Council direct that if challenges are identified through the collection of data, complimentary garbage bag tags shall be provided, as an interim measure, until implementation of the recommended Option 4 in the report (July 26, 2010) from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, is adopted by City Council in 2011.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to investigate Option 4 contained in the report (July 26, 2010) from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by mid-2011 on implementation.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to develop a database identifying:

 

a.         the number and identification of residential units and tenants above commercial establishments;

 

b.         how waste management services are offered; and

 

c.         challenges and solutions for providing bag tags.

 

3.         City Council direct that if challenges are identified through the collection of data, complimentary garbage bag tags shall be provided, as an interim measure, until implementation of the recommended Option 4 in the report (July 26, 2010) from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, is adopted by City Council in 2011.

Origin
(July 26, 2010) Report from General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services
Summary

Solid Waste Management Staff were asked to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in response to PW29.7 to amend Chapter 841, Waste Collections, Commercial Properties to require Residential Units Above Commercial premises (RUAC) property owners, who receive the tax rebate, to provide bag tags to the tenant at no additional cost.  This report discusses the four options staff considered with regards to RUAC owners and the use of bag tags.  Solid Waste Management Services will further explore the fourth option discussed in the report ("Invoice Option”) and will report back to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by mid-2011 on how to implement such a policy.

Background Information (Committee)
PW35.10-Garbage Collection - For Tenants in Residential Units Above Commercial (RUAC) Properties - Staff Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32844.pdf)


PW35.11

 

Adopted on Consent 

 

 

F. G. Gardiner Expressway and Don Valley Parkway Closure - Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario - 2011, 2012 and 2013 "Ride for Heart" Event
City Council Decision

City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council approve the closure of the F.G. Gardiner Expressway, from the Humber River to the Don Valley Parkway, including all ramps, and the Don Valley Parkway, from the F.G. Gardiner Expressway to York Mills Road, including all ramps, on the Sundays of, June 5, 2011, June 3, 2012 and June 2, 2013 from 2:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., for the 2011, 2012 and 2013 “Ride for Heart” event.

 

2.         City Council prohibit other road closures due to events or film permits on arterial roads bounded by Highway No. 401, Warden Avenue, the Lake, Humber River, Queen Street/The Queensway, and Yonge Street, which will be required to accommodate overflow traffic from the expressway closures on the day of the 2011, 2012 and 2013 “Ride for Heart” event.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the closure of the F.G. Gardiner Expressway, from the Humber River to the Don Valley Parkway, including all ramps, and the Don Valley Parkway, from the F.G. Gardiner Expressway to York Mills Road, including all ramps, on the Sundays of, June 5, 2011, June 3, 2012 and June 2, 2013 from 2:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., for the 2011, 2012 and 2013 “Ride for Heart” event.

 

2.         City Council prohibit other road closures due to events or film permits on arterial roads bounded by Highway No. 401, Warden Avenue, the Lake, Humber River, Queen Street/The Queensway, and Yonge Street, which will be required to accommodate overflow traffic from the expressway closures on the day of the 2011, 2012 and 2013 “Ride for Heart” event.

Origin
(August 3, 2010) Report from General Manager, Transportation Services
Summary

This report is to seek City Council’s authority to close the F.G. Gardiner Expressway and Don Valley Parkway for the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario’s "Ride for Heart" event for 2011, 2012 and 2013.

Background Information (Committee)
PW35.11-F. G. Gardiner Expressway and Don Valley Parkway Closure - Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario - 2011, 2012 and 2013 "Ride for Heart" Event - Staff Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32460.pdf)

PW35.11-F. G. Gardiner Expressway and Don Valley Parkway Closure - Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario - 2011, 2012 and 2013 "Ride for Heart" Event - Appendix A
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32461.pdf)


PW35.12

 

Amended 

 

Ward: 20, 28 

Gardiner Expressway York/Bay/Yonge Interchange Reconfiguration - Municipal Class Environmental Assessment
City Council Decision

City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to the General Manager of Transportation Services to issue a Notice of Study Completion and to file the Environmental Study Report for the “Modifications to the York/Bay/Yonge Ramps to the Gardiner Expressway – Class Environmental Assessment Study” in the public record for 30 days in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment.

 

2.         City Council direct that the plans for the new off-ramp from the Gardiner Expressway to Simcoe Street show a three lane cross section with standard shoulder widths. The shoulders should not extend into the north-south pedestrian crossing at the foot of the ramp.

 

3.         City Council direct that further public consultation be held regarding the proposed new north-south street between Harbour Street and Queens Quay, east of York Street, and that the results of the consultation be presented to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee.

 

4.         City Council refer requests to modify the planned lane markings on Harbour Street between Lower Simcoe Street and Yonge Street, on Lake Shore Boulevard between Sherbourne Street and Simcoe Street, and on York Street between Front Street and Queens Quay, to remove the layby at 60 Harbour Street, and to install off peak hour on street parking on Lake Shore Boulevard between Simcoe Street and Sherbourne Street, to District Traffic Operations staff for consideration.

 

5.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review the intersection of York Street, Lake Shore Boulevard West and the Gardiner Expressway on-ramp and report to the Toronto and East York Community Council on any measures to improve the safety and operation for all users.

 

6.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to the General Manager of Transportation Services to issue a Notice of Study Completion and to file the Environmental Study Report for the “Modifications to the York/Bay/Yonge Ramps to the Gardiner Expressway – Class Environmental Assessment Study” in the public record for 30 days in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment.

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee referred the following Motion by Councillor De Baeremaeker to the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, for a report directly to City Council on the impact of these recommendations:

 

“That City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to:

 

1.         Modify the Gardiner Expressway eastbound off ramp between Rees Street and Simcoe Street to be a maximum of two 3.35 metre wide lanes with no 2.5 metre wide south shoulder and no 1 metre wide north shoulder so as to decrease the pedestrian and cyclist crossing distance at Lower Simcoe Street.

 

2.         Modify Harbour Street between Lower Simcoe Street and York Street to be a maximum of four 3.35 metre wide lanes with the southerly curb lane being a maximum of 4 metres for the full length of the block in order to be friendly to cyclists.

 

3.         Modify all lanes on Harbour Street between York Street and Yonge Street to be a maximum width of 3.35 metres with the exception of a continuous southerly curb lane which can be a maximum of 4 metres wide and parking lanes with a width of 2.5 metres.

 

4.         Remove the layby at 60 Harbour Street.

 

5.         Delete the construction of the proposed north south local street between York Street and Bay Street until further public consultation has occurred.

 

6.         Restripe the lanes on Lake Shore Boulevard between the Sherbourne Street and Simcoe Street bike lanes to permit a through curb lane width of 4 metres in order for the roadway to be friendly to cyclists by second quarter 2011.

 

7.         Restripe the lanes on York Street between Front Street West and Queens Quay to permit curb lane widths of 4 metres in order for the roadway to be friendly to cyclists by second quarter 2011.

 

8.         Install off peak hour on street parking on Lake Shore Boulevard between Simcoe Street to Sherbourne Street by second quarter 2011."

 

The General Manager, Transportation Services, and Penelope Palmer, Senior Engineer, Infrastructure Planning, Transportation Services, gave a presentation to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the Gardiner Expressway York/Bay/Yonge Interchange Reconfiguration - Municipal Class Environmental Assessment.

Origin
(July 28, 2010) Report from General Manager, Transportation Services
Summary

The City of Toronto Official Plan and the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan (2003) each have policies to promote the creation of pedestrian friendly environments, as well as improving conditions for cyclists. In line with these policies, several studies and plans, including the Central Bayfront Ramp Study and the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan, have identified possible modifications to the road network in the vicinity of the F. G. Gardiner Expressway York, Bay and Yonge Streets eastbound off-ramps and Bay Street on-ramp to improve conditions for pedestrians and cyclists as well as the urban fabric of this downtown neighbourhood.

 

The need to make these changes to the original (1960s) Gardiner Expressway ramps stems from the vastly different demands and uses of today. The current volume of pedestrian, cyclist, and vehicular activity in the central waterfront, in association with extensive development and further planned intensification, requires a re-working of the road system so as to preserve its operational integrity while improving conditions for all users.

 

A Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) study has been undertaken to identify modifications to these York, Bay and Yonge Street ramps.  The EA study included the identification and evaluation of a reasonable range of alternatives in consultation with the public and review agencies.

 

The resulting Recommended Design is to reconfigure the eastbound off-ramps to a single shorter direct off-ramp to Harbour Street at Lower Simcoe Street. This shorter ramp will allow exiting motorists to turn right or left from Harbour Street to Lower Simcoe Street (right only), York Street, Bay Street, and Yonge Street. In addition, a new north-south road is recommended, connecting Harbour Street to Queens Quay east of York Street.  These modifications will maintain acceptable traffic conditions and improve mobility within the area while freeing up road space, sidewalks, and open space to enable improvements to the public realm.

 

The entry ramp from northbound Bay Street to the eastbound Gardiner Expressway was also assessed during this study. The ramp is recommended to be closed to general traffic but remain available as a bus-only ramp. This reduction in ramp volume will significantly improve the conditions for pedestrians and cyclists crossing the ramp on the east side of Bay Street, while maintaining emergency vehicle access to the elevated Expressway and avoiding disruption to service from the nearby GO Transit Bus Terminal.

 

The Harbour Street off-ramp and the Bay Street on-ramp can be treated as two distinct entities, despite having been the subject of a combined EA study. The Bay Street proposal is an operational change that is pre-approved under the Municipal Class EA, whereas the Harbour Street ramp, as a new facility, requires that a Notice of Study Completion be issued and the Environmental Study Report filed in the public record for a minimum 30-day review period per the Municipal Class EA procedures.

Background Information (Committee)
PW35.12-Gardiner Expressway York/Bay/Yonge Interchange Reconfiguration - Municipal Class Environmental Assessment - Staff Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32472.pdf)

PW35.12-Gardiner Expressway York/Bay/Yonge Interchange Reconfiguration - Attachment 1
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32499.pdf)

PW35.12-Gardiner Expressway York/Bay/Yonge Interchange Reconfiguration - Attachment 2
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32500.pdf)

PW35.12-Gardiner Expressway York/Bay/Yonge Interchange Reconfiguration - Attachment 3
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32501.pdf)

PW35.12-Gardiner Expressway York/Bay/Yonge Interchange Reconfiguration - Attachment 4
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32502.pdf)

PW35.12-Gardiner Expressway York/Bay/Yonge Interchange Reconfiguration - Attachment 5
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32503.pdf)

PW35.12-Gardiner Expressway York/Bay/Yonge Interchange Reconfiguration - Attachment 6
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32504.pdf)

PW35.12-Gardiner Expressway York/Bay/Yonge Interchange Reconfiguration - Attachment 7
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32505.pdf)

Background Information (City Council)
(August 23, 2010) supplementary report from the General Manager, Transportation Services (PW35.12a)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-33393.pdf)

Communications (Committee)
(August 4, 2010) Letter from Keith Spence (PW.New.PW35.12.1)
(August 4, 2010) E-mail from Mitch Gold, First Nations Indigenous Trust (PW.New.PW35.12.2)
(August 15, 2010) E-mail from Sonny Wong (PW.New.PW35.12.3)
(August 18, 2010) Letter from Braz Menezes, Planning Committee, York Quay Neighbourhood Association (PW.New.PW35.12.4)
(August 18, 2010) Letter from Ulla Colgrass, Co-Chair, Planning Committee, York Quay Neighbourhood Association  (PW.New.PW35.12.5)
(August 16, 2010) Letter from D. Cooper, President, York Condominium Corporation Number 510 (PW.New.PW35.12.6)
(August 18, 2010) Letter from Bob Rasmussen, Co-Chair, York Quay Neighbourhood Association (PW.New.PW35.12.7)
(August 17, 2010) E-mail from Peter Wood (PW.New.PW35.12.8)
(August 14, 2010) E-mail from Peter Wood (PW.New.PW35.12.9)
(August 17, 2010) Letter from Frederic Taylor (PW.New.PW35.12.10)
Communications (City Council)
(August 19, 2010) E-mail from Zubin Austin (CC.Main.PW35.12.11)
Speakers (Committee)

Braz Menezes, York Quay Neighbourhood Association (Submission Filed)
Ulla Colgrass, Planning Committee, York Quay Neighbourhood Association (Submission Filed)
Bob Rasmussen, Co-Chair, York Quay Neighbourhood Association (Submission Filed)
Leah Lambert, Board Member, York Condominium Corporation No. 510
Peter Bonch
Ed Moreau
Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20 - Trinity-Spadina


PW35.13

 

Adopted on Consent 

 

Ward: 32 

Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment Annual Compliance Reports 2009
City Council Decision

City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.           City Council receive for information the “Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment:  Implementation of the Approved Undertaking – 2009 Annual Compliance Report”, as submitted to the Ministry of the Environment by staff on March 31, 2010.

 

2.         City Council receive for information the Implementation and Compliance Monitoring Committee’s (ICMC) 2009 Mediation Agreement Interim Compliance Report with staff responses to concerns and comments raised by the ICMC contained therein.

 

3.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, to engage the professional services of a firm with specialization in the Province of Ontario’s Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process to undertake a peer review of the Option Evaluation and Scoring Methodology used in the selection of the preferred option in the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Effluent Disinfection Class Environmental Assessment Study – February 2010; and report back to the next meeting of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in 2011 on the results of the peer review.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.          City Council receive for information the “Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment:  Implementation of the Approved Undertaking – 2009 Annual Compliance Report”, as submitted to the Ministry of the Environment by staff on March 31, 2010.

 

2.         City Council receive for information the Implementation and Compliance Monitoring Committee’s (ICMC) 2009 Mediation Agreement Interim Compliance Report with staff responses to concerns and comments raised by the ICMC contained therein.

 

3.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, to engage the professional services of a firm with specialization in the Province of Ontario’s Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process to undertake a peer review of the Option Evaluation and Scoring Methodology used in the selection of the preferred option in the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Effluent Disinfection Class Environmental Assessment Study – February 2010; and report back to the next meeting of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in 2011 on the results of the peer review.

Origin
(August 3, 2010) Report from General Manager, Toronto Water
Summary

The purpose of this report is to submit: (i) the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment Approved Undertaking 2009 Annual Compliance Report as submitted by staff to the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) in March 2010; and (ii) the 2009 Mediation Agreement Interim Compliance Report on behalf of the Implementation and Compliance Monitoring Committee (ICMC).

 

The Approved Undertaking Annual Compliance Report summarizes the City’s activities undertaken during the preceding year and is submitted to the MOE to fulfill a condition of approval of the Environmental Assessment.  The Interim Compliance Report summarizes the ICMC’s concerns with respect to the implementation of the Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment Mediation Agreement and provides a set of staff responses for each concern raised.

Background Information (Committee)
PW35.13-Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment Annual Compliance Reports 2009 - Staff Report
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32457.pdf)

PW35.13-Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment - Attachment 1
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32458.pdf)

PW35.13-Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment - Attachment 2
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32459.pdf)

Communications (Committee)
(August 17, 2010) E-mail from David Done (PW.New.PW35.13.1)
(August 17, 2010) Letter from Michael Brothers (PW.New.PW35.13.2)
(August 17, 2010) Letter from Lino Grima, Centre for Environment, University of Toronto (PW.New.PW35.13.3)
(August 18, 2010) E-mail from Karen Buck, Co-Chair, Ashbridges Bay Treatment Neighbourhood Committee (PW.New.PW35.13.4)
(August 18, 2010) E-mail from Michael Rosenberg (PW.New.PW35.13.5)
Speakers (Committee)

Karen Buck, President, Citizens for a Safe Environment (Submission Filed)
Michael Rosenberg (Submission Filed)
Andrew James
Michael Brothers, Toronto Chapter of Council of Canadians


PW35.14

 

Referred 

 

Ward: 40 

Electronic Policing Pilot Project - Pharmacy Avenue
City Council Decision

City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, referred this Item to the General Manager, Transportation Services, to explore techniques to reduce speeds on Pharmacy Avenue, with a view to determining a model which can be implemented in selected school zones.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Provincial Government for permission to introduce a pilot electronic policing project on the section of Pharmacy Avenue south of Finch Avenue East that has the three schools.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to look at interim measures that may be taken on Pharmacy Avenue.

Origin
(June 1, 2010) Letter from Councillor Norm Kelly, Ward 40 - Scarborough Agincourt
Summary

Councillor Norm Kelly requesting the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee to ask the Provincial Government for permission to introduce a pilot electronic policing project on the section of Pharmacy Avenue south of Finch that has the three schools.

Background Information (Committee)
PW35.14-Electronic Policing Pilot Project - Pharmacy Avenue - Letter from Councillor Norm Kelly
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-32240.pdf)


PW35.16

 

Adopted on Consent 

 

Ward: 32 

Request for Reimbursement of Cost of Installing a Sewer Clean-out at 67 Kingswood Road
City Council Decision

City Council on August 25, 26 and 27, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, to reimburse the homeowner at No. 67 Kingswood Road up to a maximum amount of $1,540.00 for installation of the clean-out, upon receipt of the detailed invoice for the work carried out.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, to reimburse the homeowner at No. 67 Kingswood Road up to a maximum amount of $1,540.00 for installation of the clean-out, upon receipt of the detailed invoice for the work carried out.

Origin
(July 31, 2010) Letter from Council Speaker and Councillor Sandra Bussin, Ward 32 - Beaches-East York
Summary

Council Speaker and Councillor Sandra Bussin requesting, on behalf of Ms. Sue Stuart, the reimbursement of $2,887.50  for a sewer clean-out that was installed at 67 Kingswood Road as a result of a recommendation made by City staff at a public meeting.

Background Information (Committee)
PW35.16-Request for Reimbursement of Cost of Installing a Sewer Clean-out at 67 Kingswood Road - Letter from Council Speaker and Councillor Sandra Bussin
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-33023.pdf)

Speakers (Committee)

Robert Stuart
Councillor Sandra Bussin, Ward 32 - Beaches-East York


Submitted Wednesday, August 18, 2010
Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, Chair, Public Works and Infrastructure Committee