July 16, 1998
Ms. Novina Wong
Clerk
City of Toronto
7th Floor, Metro Hall
55 John Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5V 3C6
Dear Ms. Wong:
At its meeting on Wednesday, July 15, 1998, the Commission considered the attached report
entitled, "Sheppard Subway - Platform Edge Doors (PEDs) And Automatic Train Control
(ATC)," which responds to a request made by the City Budget Committee at its meeting on
May 26, 1998 to report on the automated door system (platform edge doors) as originally
proposed for the Sheppard Subway Line and the cost factor involved.
The Commission received the above report for information and requested that a copy be
forwarded to the City Budget Committee for their information.
Sincerely,
Vincent Rodo
General Secretary
1-64
Attachment
TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION
REPORT NO.
MEETING DATE:July 15, 1998
SUBJECT:SHEPPARD SUBWAY -
PLATFORM EDGE DOORS (PEDs) AND AUTOMATIC TRAIN CONTROL (ATC)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Commission receive this report for information and that it be
forwarded to the Budget Committee.
BACKGROUND
At the Budget Committee meeting of May 26, 1998, TTC was requested "to report to the
Budget Committee on the automated door system (platform edge doors) as originally
proposed for the Sheppard Subway line and the cost factor involved". This report responds
to that request.
DISCUSSION
In August 1996, as part of the cost reduction requirements for the Sheppard Subway, the
platform edge and the Automatic Train Control doors were removed as budget items. Of
critical importance in this decision was the need to keep a standardized operational system
with the same cars, signal system and platform design throughout all the subway routes.
"Customizing" the Sheppard line with its own specialized signal system, car fleet, platform
edge doors did not make operational sense and would greatly reduce the operational
flexibility of the system.
Although it may be possible to retrofit PED(s), it has not been done regularly and is not
recommended. PED(s) can be most cost effectively installed on new start systems. The cost
savings from elimination of finishes and reduction in ventilation shafts are lost if they are
retrofitted. Also, installation costs will increase the cost of PED(s) due to the limited
working hours during night time and the renovation nature of the work. Impacts on the
operating system will also occur.
To install platform edge doors throughout the system is technically very difficult as the
existing station platforms were never designed to allow for the essential introduction of
PEDs at some later date. There are 66 stations and the cost of doing all of the stations is
roughly estimated to be $353 million. Likewise, the cost to modify the existing car fleet
(620 vehicles) and signal system for Automatic Train Operation, (56.4 km) is estimated at
$490 million. The total cost would be approximately $850 million. This cost does not
include modifications to the existing subway ventilation system which is based on the open
platform concept.
While these costs are somewhat speculative in the absence of detailed engineering, they are
a good indication of the order of magnitude costs that will have to be considered for the
entire line. With the costs anticipated and unclear value to be derived by the installation of
these doors, it is doubtful that funding will be made available for the system.
The cost of retrofitting the PED(s) is based on similar undertakings with the Singapore,
Kuala Lumpur and the Jubilee Extension transit systems. The cost for introducing an
Automatic Train Control is based on the recent activities associated with the Docklands
Light Rail, MUNI of San Francisco and the most recent successful bid by Bombardier on
the JFK people mover.
Specific to Sheppard, design and construction have proceeded on the premise that the PEDs
will not be installed. If a direction is given to re-design or modify construction to
incorporate these doors sometime during the construction stage, added cost would be
incurred to redesign and modify construction already carried out.
In addition, Sheppard will incur $16M for the acquisition of 8 more vehicles to deal with the
uniqueness of its configuration. Also, the introduction of the ATC will necessitate a
demonstration of the technology which will delay the completion of the Sheppard subway
by at least one year for a cost of $9M.
If the decision were made today we anticipate that the cost to install the doors and customize
the Sheppard car fleet and signal system will be $60.2 million.
JUSTIFICATION
Given the impracticality of customizing the Sheppard line and lack of funding for a massive
and costly retrofit of the entire system it is not recommended that the installation of the
PEDs be pursued further.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
June 30, 1998
50-24-PS
240412
SHEPPARD SUBWAY
PLATFORM EDGE DOORS (PEDs) AND AUTOMATIC TRAIN CONTROL
Platform Edge Doors (5 Stations) - 1998
(included station ventilation) |
$12M |
Modifications to Cars |
4.8 |
New Signalling System (ATC) |
6.5 |
Modifications to Stations |
4.8 |
Reduce Tunnel Ventilation Shafts |
(3.2) |
Engineering on above (23%) |
5.7 |
Sub-total |
30.6 |
Contingency @ 15% |
4.6 |
Sub-Total |
$35.2M |
Acquisition of an additional 8 vehicles by the
Commission (from 20 to 28) |
16.0 |
Delay to Opening
(12 months @ $1.5M/month @ 50%) |
9.0 |
TOTAL |
$60.2M |
1996 Cost Reductions
CPED(s)
CAutomatic Train Control |
($4.0M)
($6.5M) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STAFF SUMMARY SHEET
ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION BRANCH |
PREPARED BY:P. StefowDEPARTMENT HEAD - A.G. Bertolo
EXTENSION:6760GENERAL MANAGER - J.A. Sepulis
USER ID:DATE REQUIRED BY THE ORIGINATOR: |
PURPOSE:COMMISSION REPORT RE:SHEPPARD SUBWAY -
PLATFORM EDGE DOORS (PEDs) AND AUTOMATIC TRAIN CONTROL (ATC)
DISCUSSION:
ALTERNATIVES:
(If applicable)
FUNDING:
(If applicable)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
|
# |
ROUTING |
CONCUR |
NON-CONCUR |
DATE |
ATTACHMENT(S) |
2 |
GM - ENG & CONST |
|
|
|
|
8 |
GM - EXECUTIVE |
|
|
|
6 |
GM - OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
5 |
DEPUTY GM - SUBWAY |
|
|
|
|
DEPUTY GM - SURFACE |
|
|
|
7 |
DEPUTY GM - CORPORATE |
|
|
|
ACTION REQUIRED BY CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER |
|
GENERAL COUNSEL |
|
|
|
9SIGN AGREEMENT
9RECEIVE FOR INFORMATION
9APPROVE
:APPROVE FOR SUBMISSION TO COMMISSION
9APPROVE FOR SUBMISSION TO CHAIR
___________________________________________
SIGNATURE DATE |
|
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
|
|
|
|
MGR - HUMAN RES |
|
|
|
|
MGR - M&P |
|
|
|
1 |
CHIEF PM - SHEP SUBWAY |
|
|
|
3 |
MGR - SAFETY |
|
|
|
4 |
CSO - CORP SEC |
|
|
|
240412
|