Corporate Smog Alert Response Plan
The Board of Health endorsed the development of a Corporate Smog Alert Response Plan as outlined in the report dated April 7, 1998 from the Medical Officer of Health, noted the endorsement by the Environmental Task Force of this Plan and forwards this report to City Council for information.
The Board of Health submits the following report (April 7, 1998) from the Medical Officer of Health regarding a corporate smog alert response plan:
Purpose:
This report provides information on steps that are being taken to develop a corporate smog alert response plan for the new City of Toronto for implementation during the summer of 1998 and beyond. With municipal amalgamation, there is a need to merge existing smog reduction practices and plans adopted by former Toronto-area municipalities into a comprehensive plan for the new City of Toronto.
Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
The financial and resource implications of implementing a corporate smog alert response plan will be addressed in a report to the Board of Health in late spring.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) the development of a corporate smog alert response plan be endorsed; and
(2) this report be forwarded by the Board of Health to City Council for information.
Background:
In response to growing concern about the health impacts of smog, a number of former Toronto-area municipalities took steps to ensure that their organizations had plans in place to respond during poor air quality episodes. City Council for the former City of Toronto unanimously adopted the recommendation of the Anti-Smog Working Group (ASWG) and in doing so directed that a corporate Smog Alert Response Plan activated by the Medical Officer of Health be implemented during Air Quality Advisories (July 14, 1997). Also, during consideration of the Smog Accord for Ontario, Metro Council directed staff to modify certain activities to reduce emissions from corporate activities during Air Quality Advisory Days (June 18, 1997).
In addition to the above former council decisions, operating departments of several former Toronto area municipalities developed policies and/or practices for modifying activities during poor air quality episodes. The policies and practices included, where feasible, minimizing the use of pesticides and motorized equipment.
With municipal amalgamation, there is a need to merge these existing smog reduction practices and plans adopted by former Toronto-area municipalities into a comprehensive plan for the new City of Toronto.
Discussion:
Each summer Toronto experiences episodes of poor air quality that can have adverse health and environmental impacts. Recent research studies strongly suggest an association between poor air quality episodes in Toronto and southern Ontario and adverse respiratory health effects including illness and death. The growing body of evidence, reviewed by the Department of Public Health in a report to the Toronto Board of Health (July 11, 1996), provides a health-based rationale for improving air quality in the Toronto area. Also, trees, vegetation and buildings can be adversely impacted by high levels of smog-related pollutants. The number of poor air quality episodes experienced in Toronto has ranged from as few as one to as many as six per summer due to a combination of emissions and weather-related factors such as temperature and wind patterns. An Air Quality Advisory (also referred to as a smog alert) is called when levels of smog-related pollutants such as ground level ozone are forecasted to exceed acceptable exposure limits. Each advisory typically lasts one to three days.
A smog alert response plan is one way in which the corporation can make a direct contribution to environmental health during episodes of poor air quality. It is an important component of any broader initiative that aims to prevent air pollution and eventually reduce or eliminate poor air quality episodes. The provincial Smog Management Plan estimates that by reducing emissions of smog-producing pollutants by 45 percent (based on 1995 emission rates), there will be a 75 percent reduction in the number of smog alerts by the year 2015. In establishing a corporate smog alert response plan, Toronto would join 13 US cities that have already established smog alert response plans.
As a first step in developing a corporate smog alert response plan for Toronto, functional leads for those program areas which have the ability to make significant contributions to the City=s efforts to improve air quality on smog alert days have been invited to jointly develop the smog alert response plan. The plan will include the following components:
(a) Notification procedures will ensure that program areas are aware of a forecasted Air Quality Advisory (AQA) as soon as the Medical Officer of Health receives notification from the Ministry of Environment (MOE) and Environment Canada. The MOE will be approached to discuss the potential of receiving advance warning of a pending AQA.
(b) Program area response plans will identify activities and operations for suspension/ modification on smog alert days. The types of activities to be included in the program area response plans will include those previously adopted and practised by the former Toronto area municipalities (Table 1a). Additional activities identified for further consideration are presented in Table lb.
(c) Short and long term evaluation mechanisms will be developed to examine the benefits and impacts of the smog alert response plan.
(d) A communication/awareness plan will: i) inform employees of the corporate smog alert response plan, the potential health and environmental impacts of smog, and how changes in individual behaviours can help on smog alert days, and ii) inform the community about City=s response during poor air quality episodes.
A report on the corporate smog alert response implementation plan will be presented to the Board of Health for approval in late spring. A copy of that report will also be forwarded to the Environmental Task Force for endorsement.
Conclusions:
A smog alert response plan is one way in which the corporation can make a direct contribution to environmental health during episodes of poor air quality. It is an important component of any broader initiative that aims to prevent air pollution and eventually reduce or eliminate poor air quality episodes.
A process is underway to develop a corporate smog alert response plan for implementation during the summer of 1998.
Contact Name:
Franca Ursitti, Environmental Protection Office, Public Health
Tel: 392-6788
Fax: 392-7418
email: fursitti@city.toronto.on.ca
The Board of Health also submits the following report (April 14, 1998) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Environmental Task Force reports having endorsed the recommendations contained in the report dated March 27, 1998 from the Medical Officer of Health.
Background:
The Environmental Task Force at its meeting held on April 8, 1998, had before it a report (March 27, 1998) from the Medical Officer of Health providing information on the steps being taken to develop a corporate smog alert response plan for the new City of Toronto for implementation during the summer of 1998 and beyond, and the need to merge existing smog reduction practices and plans adopted by the former Toronto-area municipalities into a comprehensive plan for the new City of Toronto.
The Task Force also had before it the following background reports which outline the existing smog reduction practices and plans adopted by the former Toronto-area municipalities:
(1) The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto dated June 4, 1996, entitled AMunicipal `Clean Air= Summit@;
(2) The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto dated June 18, 1997, entitled ASmog Accord For Ontario@;
(3) The City of Toronto dated July 14, 1997, entitled ACatching Your Breath - A Corporate Model for Clean Air@; and
(4) The City of Toronto dated September 22 and 23, 1997, entitled ACatching Your Breath - Partnerships for Clean Air@.
Dr. Sheela Basrur, Medical Officer of Health, appeared before the Task Force in connection with the foregoing matter.
CCCC
(Tables 1a and 1b referred to in the foregoing report (April 7, 1998) from the Medical Officer of Health, were forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda of the Board of Health for its meeting on April 21, 1998, and copies thereof are on file with the office of the City Clerk.)
|