City of Toronto  
HomeContact UsHow Do I...?Advanced search
Living in TorontoDoing businessVisiting TorontoAccessing City Hall
 
Accessing City Hall
Mayor
Councillors
Meeting Schedules
   
   
  City of Toronto Council and Committees
  All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.
   

 

Recommendation Report -

Zoning Amendment Application UDOZ-97-42 -

Rita Malcolm - 27 Marshlynn Avenue - North York Humber

 The North York Community Council recommends that the following report not be adopted and that the application be refused:

 Purpose:

 The purpose of this report is to recommend a zoning by-law amendment at 27 Marshlynn Avenue, to permit a commercial use (beauty salon) within a portion of the existing dwelling as a home business (refer to schedule "C"). There is no new construction associated with this proposal.

 Recommendations:

 It is recommended that the application be approved subject to the following:

 (1)the site be rezoned to R4 (51) subject to the following exceptions:

 PERMITTED USES

 (a)in addition to the uses permitted in the R4 Zone, a personal service shop shall be permitted;

 EXCEPTION REGULATIONS

 (b)the maximum gross floor area of the personal service shop shall be 40m²; and

 (c)no external signage shall be permitted; and

 (2)prior to enactment of the by-law for the zoning amendment, the applicant shall demonstrate that the existing building at 27 Marshlynn Avenue complies with the requirements of the Building and Fire Codes for the beauty salon.

 Background:

 The subject property is located on the south side of Marshlynn Avenue, between Jane Street and Black Creek Drive. A mix of single and semi-detached dwellings, institutional uses and open spaces are located within the vicinity of the site (schedule "B").

 Proposal:

 The applicant proposes to legalize the existing 40m² home business within the basement portion of the one and one half storey single family dwelling and expand the business an additional 70m² on the ground floor. The home business would have a total gross floor area of 110m². The application was submitted as a result of the By-law Enforcement Department issuing a Notice of Violation dated August 27, 1997, for having a commercial operation on the subject property which is not permitted under the current zoning.

 A community consultation meeting was held on March 12, 1998. The majority of people attending supported the application. The issues raised included limiting the size of the beauty salon, prohibiting external signage, providing adequate on site parking, tax assessment, environmental considerations, and ensuring the residential character of the dwelling was maintained. The impact on commercial properties by allowing commercial uses of this size to relocate in residential dwellings was an issue, especially given the high vacancy rates in existing commercial buildings. The issues raised by the community are addressed in the discussion portion of this report. A summary of the comments made at the meeting and letters in support and opposition for this proposal are attached as schedule "D".

 Official Plan:

 The lands are designated Residential Density One (RD1) which permits primarily single and semi detached dwellings. The official plan also permits minor commercial uses provided they are ancillary to the residential use or serve the local residential population. No official plan amendment is required for this project (schedule "A").

 Zoning By-law:

 The property is zoned One Family Detached Dwelling Fourth Density Zone (R4). A zoning by-law amendment is required to permit the proposed commercial use (schedule "B").

 Comments:

 The Transportation Department (North York Office) advise that 5 parking spaces are required for this site with a 110m² beauty salon, 2 spaces for the residential use and 3 spaces for the commercial use (refer to schedule "E").

 Discussion:

 Council is guided by principles that aim to enhance the residential neighbourhoods and encourage other uses that are compatible with residential uses to ensure neighbourhoods continue as pleasant and safe living environments. The official plan establishes the principle that minor commercial uses can enhance residential areas provided there are appropriate performance standards to ensure the use remains compatible with adjacent properties. Compatibility of a home business with adjacent properties can be achieved where:

 -the residential character of the dwelling is maintained;

-residential remains the predominant use within the dwelling unit;

-the use is conducted by a member who resides in the dwelling;

-the use is not likely to create or become a public nuisance, particularly with regard to noise and odours;

-adequate on-site parking can be provided without detracting from the residential character; and

-all operations occur entirely within the existing residential unit.

 Scale of the Home Business and the Residential Community:

 The proposed home business will maintain the physical characteristics of the dwelling because no new construction is proposed and the owner of the business will continue to reside in the main portion of the dwelling.

 The proposed commercial use has a gross floor area of 110m² which represents 40 percent of the floor area of the existing dwelling. In similar applications throughout the City, commercial uses have generally been limited to 25 percent of the dwelling, up to a maximum of 28m², based on the general home occupation guidelines established as part of our earlier housing policy efforts. The proposal at 110m² does not meet the intent of ensuring residential remains the predominant use in the dwelling. However, a home business in excess of 28m² would be acceptable in this instance given the size and scale of the existing dwelling (279m²). It is recommended the home business be limited to 15 percent of the dwelling which represents the existing 40m² beauty salon to ensure a reasonable scale and that residential remains the predominate use.

 Residents at the community meeting did not support expansion of the beauty salon to 110m² because they felt it would adversely impact on adjacent properties. Some residents believed there would be a negative impact on commercial properties because business owners would make similar applications and leave their commercial area locations. Impacts on adjacent properties are minimized given the recommended reduced size of the beauty salon.

 By limiting the beauty salon to 40m² the number of required parking spaces is reduced to 3 which can easily be accommodated in the existing driveway. External signage is not recommended to ensure the home business is not substantially apparent to persons outside the residence and to preserve the residential nature of the dwelling.

 Environment:

 Environmental impacts such as, noise, fumes, dust, wind or vibration are not anticipated given the nature of the proposed beauty salon. In order to ensure the dwelling remains compatible with surrounding residential land uses, the range of commercial uses should be limited to a personal service shop only. A beauty salon is defined as a personal service shop in the zoning by-law. Restricting the commercial activity in the dwelling to a personal service shop addresses the issues raised at the meeting by residents regarding adverse impacts associated with allowing various commercial activities.

Conclusions:

 Site plan approval is not required as there is no new construction proposed. Staff recommend approval of this application subject to the conditions contained in the report.

Contact Name:

 Anthony Rossi, Planner

Phone: 395-7114Fax: 395-7155

---------------

 (A copy of the schedules and draft zoning by-law amendment referred to in the foregoing report is on file in the office of the City Clerk, North York Civic Centre.)

 The North York Community Council also reports having had before it a petition (April 7, 1998) signed by approximately 31 area residents in opposition to the application.

 A recorded vote on a motion by Councillor Mammoliti, North York Humber, to refuse the application, was as follows:

 FOR:Councillors Mammoliti, Li Preti, Moscoe, Augimeri, Berger, Flint, Filion, King

 AGAINST:Councillors Sgro, Feldman, Gardner, Chong

 ABSENT:Councillors Minnan-Wong, Shiner

 Carried

 

   
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.

 

City maps | Get involved | Toronto links
© City of Toronto 1998-2001