Sale of Scattered Units Owned by Ontario
Housing Corporation in the City of Toronto
The Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee recommends to Council:
(a)the adoption of the report of the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood
Services;
(b)that the report of the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services be
forwarded to the Federal Government and Federal Minister responsible for housing;
and further that the Minister be advised of the proposed sale of the Provincial housing
stock prior to ownership of such housing stock being transferred to the City of
Toronto; and
(c)that the Provincial Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing be advised that the
City of Toronto will be nominating its two representatives to the Board of Directors of
the Metropolitan Toronto Housing Authority; and further that the matter of these
nominations be referred to the Striking Committee for consideration.
The Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee reports having:
(i)directed that The Public Housing Fightback Campaign, the Canadian Union of Public
Employees, Local 767, the Ontario Public Service Employees Union, Local 592, and any
other interested party, be given the opportunity to present their concerns on the Metropolitan
Toronto Housing Authority at the next meeting of the Community and Neighbourhood
Services Committee on September 10, 1998; and that this matter be considered as the first
item of business on the agenda for such meeting;
(ii)referred to the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services and the Chief
Executive Officer of the Metropolitan Toronto Housing Authority the communications and
brief from The Public Housing Fightback Campaign, the Canadian Union of Public
Employees Local 767 and the Regent Park Community Health Centre for review and
comment thereon to the September 10, 1998, meeting of the Community and
Neighbourhood Services Committee; and
(iii)directed that the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services be
requested to report to the Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee on the
feasibility of selling MTHA housing stock once the ownership and management
responsibility has been fully downloaded to the City of Toronto.
The Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee submits the following report
(June30, 1998) from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services:
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1)Council oppose the sale of the scattered houses owned by the Ontario Housing
Corporation in the City of Toronto;
(2)Council's position be forwarded to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing and to
the Chairs of the Boards of the Ontario Housing Corporation and the Metropolitan Toronto
Housing Authority; and
(3)the appropriate City officials take the necessary steps to give effect thereto.
Purpose of the Report:
The Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee at its meeting of June 18, 1998,
asked the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services to submit a report
outlining the Department's position on the sale of Metropolitan Toronto Housing Authority
(MTHA) scattered units. This report has been prepared in response to that request.
Background:
In June of 1996, the Ontario Housing Corporation (OHC) launched a program to sell some
of the scattered units which it owns. This was done as a cost saving measure and was part of
the 1996Business Plan of the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing. A small number
of units were sold through 1996 until a moratorium was placed on the program at the end of
1996, pending direction from the Provincial Government on plans for public housing.
In the fall of 1997, OHC began to consider the issue again and, at its meeting of January 23,
1998, the Board decided to proceed with its original plan to sell scattered units. Local
Housing Authorities across the Province, of which MTHA is one, were directed to submit
information to the OHC Board regarding any scattered unit that becomes vacant so that the
Board can decide whether to sell it or not. The units must fall within the following
parameters:
-single-detached, semi-detached or rowhouse unit;
-located on an individually severed lot;
-fewer than five bedrooms; and
-not modified to accommodate tenants with disabilities;
MTHA has identified 438 units which fall within these criteria, out of a total of
approximately 500scattered units which it manages. These units include 351 three-bedroom
houses and 87four-bedroom houses scattered throughout the City.
It is important to note that all of these houses have subsidy dollars attached to them and are
offered to low income families who pay a rent geared to income. This distinguishes these
houses from the "property houses"owned by the City, where there are no subsidies attached
and tenants pay a market rent.
The Need for Subsidized Units:
As noted, the scattered units to be considered for sale are three and four-bedroom houses.
According to waiting list data maintained by Toronto Social Housing Connections (formerly
known as the Housing Registry), as of March 31, 1998, there were 9,040 households on
waiting lists for three-bedroom units and 2,068 households on waiting lists for four-bedroom
units. The majority of these households are waiting for units operated by MTHA. In all of
1997, MTHA only turned over (i.e.,rented to new applicants) 553 three-bedroom units and
66 four-bedroom units.
Any sale of units in this category will serve to make a long wait even longer for low income
families seeking geared to income housing.
Proceeds of Sales:
OHC will not receive any additional funds from the proceeds of unit sales. Any money
generated is returned to the Province's Consolidated Revenue Fund. In a September report to
the Board, OHC indicated that it is not known if the sale of some units will affect the level
of continuing subsidy from the Federal Government. In addition, there is no plan to transfer
any subsidies from units that have been sold to other units in the social housing system. This
approach is not consistent with the Provincial Government's stated commitment to maintain
service levels through the reform of social housing prior to municipal devolution.
Conclusions:
The need and demand for affordable housing far exceeds the available supply. There is no
longer any support from the senior levels of government to build new social housing and
cities will increasingly be left to find housing solutions on their own. In the City of Toronto,
the problem is a particularly serious one as vacancy rates for rental housing are low and
there is almost no construction of private rental accommodation. Any attempt to sell units
which are already publicly owned and which have subsidies attached to them seems
counterproductive at this time. It is therefore recommended that the City of Toronto
formally oppose the sale of the scattered OHC units within the City. The Chair of the OHC
Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer of MTHA have been notified of the
City's interest in this issue and have been invited to attend the July 16, 1998, meeting of the
Committee.
--------
The Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee reports, for the information of
Council, having also had before it communications from the following:
-(July 15, 1998) from Mr. William McMillin Carson, Ontario Housing Corporation,
outlining a recommendation from the OHC's Policy and Program Committee to be
considered by the OHC Board on July 16 and 17, 1998, with respect to the issue of scattered
units for consideration for sale by the Board; and further outlining instructions to staff
should such recommendation be adopted;
-(July 15, 1998) from the City Clerk advising that City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, in
adopting, as amended, Clause No. 5 of Report No. 6 of The Community and Neighbourhood
Services Committee, headed "Capital Funding of Metropolitan Toronto Housing Authority
Projects", directed that the matter of representation on the Board of Directors of the
Metropolitan Toronto Housing Authority be referred to the Community and Neighbourhood
Services Committee for consideration;
-(July 16, 1998) from the Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 767, regarding
MTHA's proposal to expand their private management partnerships;
-(June 1998) from The Public Housing Fightback Campaign, headed "The Future
Management of Public Housing - The Case Against Further Privatization of Public Housing
in MTHA)"; and
-(June 29, 1998) from Councillor Howard Moscoe, North York Spadina, submitting a Notice
of Motion with respect to representation on boards of local housing authorities; noting that,
in the case of MTHA, the Minister of Housing appointed two representatives without
consultation with the municipality; and recommending that Council advise the Minister that
Toronto will be nominating its two representatives; and that this matter be referred to the
Striking Committee.
The following persons appeared before the Community and Neighbourhood Services
Committee in connection with the foregoing matter:
-Mr. Wally Devoe and Mr. Lyttleton Joseph, Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local
767;
-Mr. Cliff Martin and Mr. Vance Latchford on behalf of The Public Housing Fightback
Campaign;
-Mr. Henderson Phillips;
-Ms. Nicole Seguin, Community Health Worker, Regent Park Community Health Centre,
and submitted a brief in regard thereto;
-Ms. Suzanne Kelly, President, Ontario Public Service Employees Union, Local 592; and
-Councillor Howard Moscoe, North York Spadina.