Item Considered by the Committee
(a)Harmonization of User Fees
The Economic Development Committee reports having forwarded the matter of
selecting a preferred option for a new harmonization user fee policy to the Budget
Committee without recommendation for consideration in the 1999 budget process, and
also recommended that:
(1)recommendations (1), (3), (4) and (5) of the User Fee Committee contained in the
communication (November 25, 1998) from the City Clerk be adopted, viz:
"(1)(a)Policy Principles
-Recreation programs are important municipal services which contribute significant
personal, social, economic and environmental benefits which enhance the well-being of
Toronto citizens, their neighbourhoods and the local economy;
-the City of Toronto shall ensure all residents year-round accessibility to high quality
community recreation and leisure programs regardless of their ability to pay;
-the City of Toronto shall ensure equity and fairness to taxpayers and contribute to the
long term vitality of public recreation services provided by the City and the voluntary
and not-for-profit sectors; and
-the City of Toronto shall encourage maximum opportunity for the enjoyable,
healthful, satisfying and creative use of leisure time;
(b)Policy Elements
-Client and taxpayers at the forefront of pricing decisions ;
-consistency City-wide;
-quality service standards not influenced by user fees;
-accessibility strategies;
-price based on benefits to user, benefits to community and operating costs; and
-accountability;
(c)Implementation Guidelines
-Establish list of services which do not charge a user fee and are available universally;
-where a user fee is to be charged, fees to be based on different levels of cost recovery
(10% to over 100%)
-harmonize January 1999, followed by stable price strategy to ensure future
adjustments are gradual;
-establish effective measures to provide access to low income individuals and high need
communities;
-monitor and adjust fees on an annual basis prior to the submission of the annual
budget; and
-utilize a variety of effective user fee methods, including current technologies to
enhance customer service (e.g. access "smart" card and improved registration system);
(3)that the surcharge for programs and activities for participants outside the City of
Toronto area be retained;
(4)that 'high needs' communities be exempt from paying user fees for specialized
programs;
(5)that an access policy be considered that would ensure low income families and
individuals are not penalized;"
(2)recommendation (8) of the User Fee Committee be deleted and replaced with:
"(8)the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism report to the
Economic Development Committee on a process and means respecting recreational
permits;"
and that the following motion placed by Councillor Silva be referred to the
Commissioner for incorporation into the above-noted report:
"that the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism examine the
permit granting system to ensure that:
(a)all users are primarily residents of the City of Toronto;
(b)users from outside the City of Toronto pay higher fees to ensure that Toronto
taxpayers are not subsidizing residents in the 905 area; and
(c)permit holders not operating on a strictly non-profit basis pay a higher fee;"
(d)additional revenues that can be gleaned from charging more money for out-of-town
permit users, or for-profit permit users, be used to enhance the range of free programs
in the City's recreation centres;
(e)alternative sources of funding, including sponsorships , are sought and that the
revenues derived from those sources be applied to reducing user fees;
(3)recommendation (6) of the User Fee Committee be deleted and replaced with the
following:
"(6)that net revenues accruing from user fees be placed in the department's budget for
Parks and Recreation Division";
(4)the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism be requested to
report to the Economic Development Committee on:
(a)a review at the end of the first year of all the changes in demands and their impact
on the capital and operating budget of his department as a consequence of harmonizing
user fees;
(b)a review after the first year on the implementation of the program;
(b)the best practice delivery system for delivering services to high needs;
(c)all costs associated with the elimination of user fees for youth and seniors, such
report to focus on increased demand and capital costs;
(5)the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism be requested to
submit to Council when this matter is being considered, a chart showing actual fees for
some specific introductory instructional programs related to Option "E".
--------
(i)(February 10, 1999) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and
Tourism, recommending:
(1)that the Economic Development Committee provide direction on a preferred option for a
new harmonization user fee policy as outlined in this staff report;
(2)that this report be forwarded to the Budget Committee with the Economic Development
Committee recommendations for their consideration in the 1999 Budget Process; and
(3)that the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture & Tourism, be authorized to
implement harmonized rates in keeping with the Council decision on this matter;
(ii)(November 25, 1998) from the City Clerk, forwarding to the Economic Development
Committee the action of the User Fee Committee on November 24, 1998, with
recommendations;
(iii)(December 10, 1998) from Anne Dubas, President, CUPE Local 79;
(iv)(December 10, 1998) from the City Clerk, North York Community Council, forwarding
the action taken by the North York Community Council at its meeting on December 10, 1998;
(v)(January 12, 1999) from Maureen Boulter, Chairperson, Lakeshore Area Multi-Services
Project Inc. (LAMP);
(vi)(January 12, 1999) from Jasmin Earle, Chair, The Etobicoke Brighter Futures Coalition;
(vii)(January 15, 1999) from Hordofa Guysa, President, Oromo Canadian Community
Association in Ontario;
(viii)(February 2, 1999) from Councillor Olivia Chow, Chair, Youth Subcommittee of the
Children and Youth Action Committee;
(ix)(February 10, 1999) from Cal Lorimer, Toronto;
(x)(February 11, 1999) from Councillor Tom Jakobek, Chair, Budget Committee, and
Councillor George Mammoliti, Chair, User Fee Committee;
(xi)(February 11, 1999) from Councillor Norm Kelly, Scarborough Wexford;
(xii)(February 12, 1999) from Anne Dubas, President, CUPE Local 79;
(xiii)(February 12, 1999) from Joy Connelly, Toronto;
(xiv)(February 12, 1999) from Maureen P. Boulter, Lakeshore Area Multi-Services Project
Inc. (LAMP);
(xv)presentation material (February 12, 1999) from the Commissioner of Economic
Development, Culture & Tourism;
(xvi)(February 12, 1999) from Bill Worrell, on behalf of Karen Savage;
(xvii)(February 10, 1999) from Deany Peters, Community Health Worker, Regent Park
Community Health Centre;
(xviii)(February 12, 1999) from Doreen Lalor, Toronto;
(xix)(February 7, 1999) from Mandy Mack on behalf of Lincoln Lopez, York Hispanic
Centre, Toronto;
(xx)(Undated) from Mandy Mack, York Hispanic Centre, Toronto;
(xxi)(February 12, 1999) from Doug Hum, Children's Aid Society of Toronto;
(xxii)(February 12, 1999) from Donald J. Stewart, Toronto;
(xxiii)(February 12, 1999) from Myra Lewis, Toronto;
(xxiv)(February 12, 1999) from Karen Wirsig, Community Social Planning Council of
Toronto;
(xxv)(February 17, 1999) from Darlene Varaleau; and
(xxvi)(February 18, 1999) from Councillor McConnell.
--------
The following persons addressed the Economic Development Committee in connection with
the foregoing matter:
-Councillor Chow;
-Councillor Jones;
-Councillor Korwin-Kuczynski;
-Councillor Mammoliti; and
-Councillor Nunziata.
Respectfully submitted,
Councillor Brian Ashton,
Chair
Toronto, February 18, 1999
Christine Archibald
Tel. (416) 392-7039