Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application UDOZ-97-45 -
505000 N.B. Inc. - 2800 Bathurst Street - North York Spadina
The North York Community Council, after considering the deputations and based on the findings of fact,
conclusions and recommendations contained in the following report (April8,1999) from the Acting Director,
Community Planning, North District, and for the reasons that the proposal is an appropriate use of lands,
recommends that the application submitted by 505000 N.B. Inc. regarding Official Plan and Zoning Amendment
Application for 2800 Bathurst Street, be approved, subject to the conditions contained in the referenced report:
The North York Community Council also reports, for the information of Council, having instructed the Director,
Transportation Services, District 3, to conduct a traffic study, as requested by Councillor Moscoe, in order to determine if
the installation of a stop sign at Englemount Avenue and Glen Park Avenue meets the required technical requirements; and
to report back to the North York Community Council at a future meeting.
The North York Community Council reports having held a statutory public meeting on April28,1999, with appropriate
notice of this meeting, in accordance with the Planning Act.
The North York Community Council submits the following report (April 8, 1999) from the Acting Director,
Community Planning, North District:
Purpose:
This report recommends approval to permit the construction of a 6 and 7 storey, 52 unit apartment hotel with ground floor
commercial uses at the south west corner of Bathurst Street and Glen Park Avenue.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1)the site's Commercial (COM) Official Plan designation be amended to a Commercial Specific (COM Specific)
designation with the following site specific C.9 policy:
(a)Density
the maximum density permitted is 3.5 floor space index;
(2)the site's C1 zoning be amended to a C1 exception zone with the following exceptions:
Permitted Uses
(a)apartment hotel, apartment house dwelling, retail store, personal service shop shall only be permitted;
(b)for the purpose of this exception an "apartment hotel" shall mean a building or portion of a building used mainly for
the purpose of furnishing living quarters with full cooking facilities for families on a daily basis and having at least six
suites of rooms for rent, with no restaurant or dining room, but shall not include a hotel or ordinary lodging house;
(c)the maximum permitted gross floor area is 6780m²;
(d)the minimum yard setback requirements are as shown on Schedule "C";
(e)there shall be a minimum of 90 parking spaces provided on site with the minimum parking standard of 1.5 parking
spaces for each dwelling;
(f)the maximum number of dwelling units or suites shall be 52; and
(g)the maximum height of the building shall be as shown on Schedule "E";
(3)staff be directed to do all things necessary to ensure that at the time of the enactment of any zoning by-law the
following conditions have been satisfied:
(a)the conditions of the Technical Services Division of the Works and Emergency Services attached as Schedule "F";
(b)the conditions of the Works and Emergency Services, Transportation Services attached as Schedule "G"; and
(c)the conditions of the Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, Policy and Development attached as Schedule
"H";
(4)prior to enactment of the zoning by-law, the Acting Director of Community Planning, North District, shall have
granted site plan approval which addresses, public art contribution, location of roof top terraces, landscaping, building
elevations, location of garbage pickup and ingress and egress; and
(5)prior to the adoption of the Official Plan amendment the applicant shall have submitted the necessary studies required
under the Ministry of the Environment Guidelines for contaminated sites which in turn, have been subject to a peer review
and commented on by the Medical Officer of Health. In addition, prior to the issuance of a building permit the applicant
will be required to submit a Record of Site Condition that has been acknowledged by the Ministry of the Environment.
Background:
Proposal:
The revised application proposes an official plan and zoning amendment to permit a new 6 and 7 storey, 52 unit apartment
hotel with ground floor commercial uses. The applicant has indicated that the tenure of the units is to be condominium
which allows the building in the future to be used as a condominium apartment house dwelling with grade related
commercial if the apartment hotel concept is abandoned. In the event the building is used in the future as a apartment house
dwelling with grade related commercial the more restricted parking standard for apartment house dwelling units of 1.5
spaces for each unit has been applied instead of the apartment hotel standard. There is no restaurant or dining room
associated with the proposal. The applicant has indicated that the meals for guests will be catered.
A statistical breakdown of the original proposal and revised proposal is set out below.
|
November 7, 1997 Proposal |
Revised Proposal - Jan 22, 1999 |
Site Area |
1,975.77 m² (0.20 ha) |
1,975.77m² (0.20 ha) |
Residential GFA |
10,417 m² (112,131ft²) |
5,991.7m² (64,495.8ft²) |
Non-Residential GFA |
677 m² (7,287ft²) |
330.8m² (3560.8ft²) |
Total GFA |
11,094 m² (119,418ft²) |
7003.16m² (70,356.62ft²) |
Density |
5.62FSI/630 UPH/258 UPA |
3.5FSI/ 264 UPH/107 UPA |
Building Height |
9 storeys |
6 and 7 storeys |
Parking Provided |
141 Parking spaces |
91 Parking spaces |
Official Plan:The site is designated Commercial (COM) which permits a variety of retail and office uses as well as upper
floor residential uses with a maximum density of 1.5 fsi.
Zoning:General Commercial (C1) permitting a variety of retail, office and residential uses at a maximum density of 1.0.
Location and Existing Use:
The triangular shaped site is located at the south west corner of Glen Park Avenue and Bathurst Street. The site is located
next to an existing 5 storey residential condominium building with ground floor commercial uses to the south and an
existing place of worship to the west which fronts on Glen Park Avenue. To the north of the site along Bathurst Street there
is a one storey commercial building followed by a 6 storey office building. Diagonally to the site on the north side of Glen
Park Avenue and Hollaman Road there are single family dwellings. To the east of the site along Bathurst Street there are
existing one and two storey commercial buildings followed by an existing place of worship. The site is currently vacant but
was previously used as a service station and as a portion of Hollaman Road prior to its closure. The closed road has been
conveyed to this landowner.
Comments:
Other Departments:
Works and Emergency Services, Development Services advises that the location of the garbage pickup area requires further
discussion (Refer to Schedule "F"). Interim capacity exists within the Black Creek Trunk Sewer to accommodate the
proposed development.
Works and Emergency Services, Transportation Services advises that they concur with the traffic impact study submitted by
Grant A. Bacchus Limited (dated March 18, 1998) which supported the original proposal which was larger. With the
reduction in the number of units, the removal of the two proposed restaurants in the revised proposal, the traffic generated
would have a less impact on adjacent roadways. The applicant will be required to contact the Toronto Parking Authority to
determine if any parking meters on Glen Park Avenue are affected and if financial compensation is required. Works and
Emergency Services also advise that there are a number of site plan issues relating to signage for the driveway, loading and
drop-off areas, width of right out access on to Bathurst Street, underground parking layout and boulevard work (refer to
Schedule "G").
Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, Policy and Development advises that the applicant is subject to the City's 5
percent for the residential units and 2 percent for the commercial component cash in lieu parkland dedication requirement
(refer to Schedule "H").
Community Consultation:
The applicant's November 7, 1997 proposal was presented to the community at a meeting held in March of 1998 at Glen
Park Elementary School. At this meeting the community expressed its opposition to the proposed development. The
community's issues related to the density and height, not enough parking being provided, the increased traffic infiltration
through the adjacent neighbourhood and ingress and egress to and from the site (refer to Schedule "I").
Subsequent to this first community meeting, a working group was set up which consisted of members of the condominium
board at 500 Glencairn, residents living on Glen Park Avenue and Hollaman Road, local councillors and Planning staff.
The working group identified issues relating to density, height, massing, number of units, egress and ingress, overview,
traffic and parking and use and provided options to resolve them. Subsequently all parties agreed on a revised proposal
which is before Council.
A second community consultation meeting was held on February 15, 1999, to present the revised plan that was based on the
working group's recommendations. There were approximately 70 people in attendance. The applicant's presentation of the
revised proposal was followed by a question and answer period. The majority of the people in attendance showed support
for the revised proposal. In general, the matters raised by the community focussed on:
Traffic:Some residents were concerned that people will use Glen Park Avenue as a drop off area. Also, some residents
requested that a traffic study be prepared for the proposed use.
Roof top
Terraces:Residents do not want rooftop terraces facing west or north to avoid possible overview into the yards of the
single family dwellings yards along Glen Park Avenue. They prefer that all roof top terraces face Bathurst Street.
Number of
Units:Residents wanted assurances that the owner is limited to the proposed 52 units (Refer to Schedule "J").
The residents' issues have been addressed in the Discussion Section of the report. To capsulize, the proposed apartment
hotel will have a drop off area on site which should discourage people from using Glen Park Avenue as a drop off area. The
location of the roof top terraces will be addressed during the site plan approval process. The number of units will be
restricted under the zoning by-law.
Discussion:
Official Plan:
Land Use:
The site's existing Commercial (COM) designation is to be amended to permit the proposed apartment hotel with grade
related commercial.
The proposed apartment hotel will be one of the few apartment hotels that exist in the City that provides daily, weekly or
monthly accommodations for out of town guests or relatives of residents in the area visiting or attending a function at one
of the local synagogues in the area. The close proximity to the synagogues in the area allows the guests to have a short walk
when required on religious occasions.
The location takes advantage of physical infrastructure, existing community services and transportation facilities. It is
located on an arterial road, well served by public transit and close to local area parks.
The community has stated that this portion of Bathurst Street needs to be revitalized. The community is hopeful that the
proposed development will encourage future development along this stretch of Bathurst Street.
Density
The current proposal has a density of 3.5 fsi (floor space index). This is a significant reduction from the applicant's original
proposed density of 5.64 fsi. The proposed density is in context within the range of densities that exist with existing
development along this section of Bathurst Street between Lawrence Avenue West and Glencairn Avenue. These densities
range between less than 1 fsi to 3.9 fsi at the corner of Lawrence Avenue West and Bathurst Street (refer to Appendix "A").
Under Part C.5 of the Official Plan Council may approve rezoning of lands within the Commercial (COM) district to permit
increase density if the development proposal meets a number of compatibility criteria that are set out on Appendix B.
The proposal meets the Official Plan's compatibility criteria as set on the next page.
-The proposed development is adequately served by transportation facilities as it is located on Bathurst Street which is an
arterial road and is served by the TTC;
-The traffic study submitted by the applicant's traffic consultant and supported by Transportation Services of the Works
and Emergency Services Department states that the traffic generated from the proposed development will not significantly
affect the level of arterial road service;
-Traffic on Glen Park Avenue will not be increased as vehicular traffic will be restricted to only left hand turns off Glen
Park Avenue into the site as the driveway entrance will be designed to prevent right hand turns into the site. All traffic
leaving the site will exit onto Bathurst Street and not Glen Park Avenue. Also, the applicant no longer has a restaurant
component as part of the proposal in addition to a large reduction in the number of units which reduces the amount of
vehicular and pedestrian traffic that would frequent the site. The level of pedestrian safety is improved by the provision of
an enclosed pedestrian walkway through the building from the south east corner of the building on Bathurst Street to the
north west corner building fronting on Glen Park Avenue. There is also a drop off area on site for guests of the apartment
hotel;
-The proposed one way driveway system with a drop off area and loading area provides satisfactory movement of
employees and visiting automobiles and commercial vehicles, thus preventing any disruption to adjacent bordering streets
or properties.
Built Form:
The current proposal is for a building that is six and seven storeys in height with the seven storey portion of the building
being located towards Bathurst Street and the six storey portion being located towards the existing residential area to the
west. The proposed height of the building is comparable to existing buildings that are located along this section of Bathurst
Street between Glencairn Avenue and Lawrence Avenue West which range in height from one storey to 14 storeys (refer to
Appendix A).
The siting of the proposed building being located closer to Bathurst Street than what was originally proposed minimizes
any impact on the owners of the single family dwellings on Glen Park Avenue and Hollaman Road and the residents living
in the condominium building next door. Also, Glen Park Avenue rises as you go west from Bathurst Street which gives the
perception that the building is lower when looking east along Glen Park Avenue.
The general massing of this proposal implements the city's urban design policy. The new building will clearly define the
street's public open space. It will also add character and increased activity along its edges, both at Bathurst Street and Glen
Park Avenue. At the site plan stage, detailed consideration should be given to the integration of the open stairwell, the
canopied walkway and the completion of the street edge on Bathurst Street at the southern end of the building.
The existing place of worship to the west provides a buffer to the single family dwellings to the west along Glen Park
Avenue. The existing residential area to the east is buffered from this development by the existing commercial strip and a
place of worship.
Zoning By-law:
Amendments to the City's zoning standards are required for density, lot coverage and building height.
Site Plan:
A comprehensive landscape plan and details should be submitted, which illustrate how the site is to be landscaped, with
particular care for screening and landscaping along the property line and the boulevards along Glen Park Avenue and
Bathurst Street. Additional landscaping should be provided adjacent to the parking area along Glen Park Avenue. The
landscape plan should also indicate where the air intake/exhaust are for the underground garage. The location of these
should minimize their impact on the pedestrian realm.
Detailed elevations should be provided to show the architectural resolution of the building, both at grade and at the roof
terrace level. Elevation drawings should also include elevations of adjacent buildings to show the integration of the new
development.
The roof terrace facing Bathurst Street should be handicapped accessible. It should be landscaped and promote a safe and
comfortable activity area.
The location of the garbage pick-up area should be finalized with the Technical Services, Works and Emergency Services.
Minimize all curb cuts and driveway widths to provide a maximum area for landscaping.
Public Art:
The applicant has agreed to provide a public art contribution that is equal to one percent of the total cost of construction.
The art work shall be publicly accessible on the site. The site plan agreement shall address matters including, but not
limited to, the timing of the contribution, location, selection of art and if there is any maintenance.
Site Conditions:
The site has been identified as a potential soil contaminated property because of its prior use as a gas station. The applicant
has been advised that this application will be required to be supported by any necessary studies required under the Ministry
of the Environment Guidelines for contaminated sites. These studies will be subject to a peer review and commented on by
the Medical Officer of Health as part of the site plan approval prior to the adoption of the Official Plan amendment. Prior to
the issuance of a building permit a Record of Site Condition acknowledged by Ministry of the Environment is required to
be submitted by the applicant. Appropriate remediation of the site and indemnification for the city will be secured through
the site plan agreement as may be required.
Conclusions:
The proposed apartment hotel with ground floor commercial is an appropriate use for this site. The community and
applicant have worked diligently with the local Councillors and staff to achieve a proposal that addresses the concerns of
introducing an apartment hotel into the neighbourhood. It is seen by the community that this will be a positive development
for the community and should encourage similar high quality buildings in the future for this area.
Contact Name:
Randy Jones, Planner
Telephone: (416) 395-7137
Appendix "A"
Comparison of built form of existing buildings along the west side of Bathurst Street
with the proposed development.
Existing Developments
along Bathurst between
Lawrence Ave and
Glencairn Ave |
Density
(FSI) |
Building
Height in
Storeys |
No. Of Units |
Commercial
Floor Area (m²) |
Proposed
2800 Bathurst St |
3.4 |
6 & 7 |
52 |
330 |
500 Glencairn
Apartment Building |
1.5 |
5 |
40 |
1165 |
2828 Bathurst St.
Office Building |
2 |
6 |
n/a |
2500 |
2900 Bathurst St.
Apartment Building |
1.5 |
13 |
117 |
0 |
120 Shelborne Ave
Apartment Building |
n/a |
14 |
137 |
0 |
3000 Bathurst St.
Apartment Building |
2.3 |
13 |
187 |
0 |
3036-3050 Bathurst St. -
Apartment Bldg |
3.91 |
7 |
189 |
1145 |
Appendix "B"
Set out below are the compatibility criteria under Part C5 of the Official Plan for permitting increased density:
-the proposed development be adequately served by transportation facilities and be compatible with any transportation
improvement plan;
-the traffic generated from the proposed development should not result in an unacceptable level of arterial road service;
-traffic on local, collector or minor arterial roads within Residential Communities should not be increased by the
proposed development to a level that would adversely affect pedestrian safety;
-the proposed development should provide for satisfactory movement of employees and visiting automobiles and
commercial vehicles are unlikely to disrupt bordering streets or properties; and
-the proposed development should provide for sufficient parking so that off-site roadways and unaffiliated parking areas
are unlikely to be disrupted
(A copy of Schedules F, G, H, I and J referred to in the foregoing report is on file in the office of the City Clerk, North York
Civic Centre.)
________
The North York Community Council also reports having had before it the following communications:
(i)(April 27, 1999) from Dr. Howard Smith, advising of his opposition to the proposed development;
(ii)(April 18, 1999) from Shaul Ezer, expressing objection to the proposed development of an apartment hotel;
(iii)(April 14, 1999) from E. L. Weisz, expressing concerns with the proposed development;
(iv)(April 12, 1999) from Mr. Allan Kazdan, outlining his opposition to the application;
(v)(April 12, 1999) from Mr. Alex Bolton, outlining his objections to the proposed development; and
(vi)(April 12, 1999) from Ms. Jean Kaydan, outlining her opposition to the application.
The following persons appeared before the North York Community Council in connection with the foregoing matter:
-Mr. Clifford Korman, Architect, on behalf of the applicant, who indicated that the applicant was in support of the staff
recommendations;
-Mr. Vince Pallotto, who spoke in opposition to the proposed development and expressed concerns with respect to the
traffic impact on the surrounding community resulting from the proposed hotel. He also expressed concern with respect to
the precedent being set by permitting a hotel in the area.
A recorded vote on the recommendation moved by Councillor Moscoe, North York Spadina, was as follows:
FOR:Councillors Li Preti, Moscoe, Feldman, Berger, Flint, Gardner, Chong, Filion, King
AGAINST:NIL
ABSENT:Councillors Mammoliti, Sgro, Augimeri, Minnan-Wong, Shiner
Carried