|
|
 |
 |
|
| |
|
City of Toronto Council and Committees |
| |
|
All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@toronto.ca.
|
| |
|
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF TORONTO
Clerk's Department
Minutes of the Scarborough Community Council
Meeting No. 4
Tuesday, March 30, 1999
The Scarborough Community Council met on Tuesday, March 30, 1999, in the Meeting Hall,
Scarborough Civic Centre, commencing at 9:30 a.m.
Members present:
Councillor Lorenzo Berardinetti, Chair
Councillor Gerry Altobello
Councillor Brian Ashton
Councillor Bas Balkissoon
Councillor Raymond Cho
Councillor Brad Duguid
Councillor Frank Faubert
Councillor Doug Mahood
Councillor Ron Moeser
Councillor Sherene Shaw
Councillor Mike Tzekas
Confirmation of Minutes.
On a motion by Councillor Altobello, the Minutes of the meeting of the Scarborough
Community Council held on February 17, 1999, were confirmed.
4.1 Request for a 40 Kilometre Per Hour Speed Limit
on McCowan Road, North of Kingston Road
Ward 13 - Scarborough Bluffs
The Scarborough Community Council had before it a report (March 11, 1999) from the
Director, Transportation Services, District 4, recommending that:
(1) the 60 kilometre per hour speed limit identified in Appendix 1 of this report be
rescinded;
(2) the 60 kilometre per hour speed limit identified in Appendix 2 of this report be
adopted; and
(3) the appropriate by-law be amended accordingly.
On a motion by Councillor Ashton, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 1, Report No. 4)
4.2 Request for Installation of Traffic Control Signals
Pharmacy Avenue and Dewey Drive
Ward 14 - Scarborough Wexford
The Community Council had before it:
(1) a communication (January 13, 1999) from the City Clerk, advising that the Urban
Environment and Development Committee, at its meeting on January 11, 1999,
referred the report, dated December 8, 1998, from the General Manager,
Transportation Services, respecting the above-noted request, to the Scarborough
Community Council for consideration; and
(2) a memorandum (March 30, 1999) from Councillor Kelly, advising that he and
Councillor Tzekas attended a community meeting on this matter at which it was
agreed that Transportation staff would review the options and issues brought to
their attention by the community and report back, and requesting deferral of the
report (December 8, 1999) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, until
staff have reported and the community is ready to approach Scarborough Community
Council with its recommendations.
On a motion by Councillor Tzekas, the Community Council deferred this
matter, as requested by Councillor Kelly, to permit further consultation
with the community, and requested that the Director of Transportation
Services, East District, or his designate, attend the community meeting.
(Clause No. 20(b), Report No. 4)
4.3 Proposed Modifications to Traffic Control Signals
Lawrence Avenue East at Crockford Boulevard
and Ellington Drive
Ward 14 - Scarborough Wexford
The Community Council had before it:
(1) a report (March 11, 1999) from the Director of Transportation Services, District
4, advising Community Council of the feasibility of incorporating the intersection
of Lawrence Avenue East and Ellington Drive within the existing traffic control
signals at Crockford Boulevard, and recommending that this report be received for
information; and
(2) a memorandum (March 29, 1999) from Councillor Kelly, requesting deferral of the
foregoing report to permit community consultation.
On a motion by Councillor Tzekas, the Community Council deferred the report
of the Director, Transportation Services, District 4, dated March 11, 1999,
to the meeting scheduled to be held on April 28, 1999, to permit further
consultation with the community.
(Clause No. 20(c), Report No. 4)
4.4 Twelve Hour Parking Limit on Mayhill Crescent
Ward 16 - Scarborough Highland Creek
The Community Council had before it a report (March 11, 1999) from the Director of
Transportation Services, District 4, recommending that a 12 hour limit not be installed on
Mayhill Crescent.
On a motion by Councillor Moeser, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 2, Report No. 4)
4.5 Parking and Traffic Conditions on Nelson Street and
Farmbrook Road at Cedarbrook Junior Public School
Ward 15 - Scarborough City Centre
The Community Council had before it a report (March 11, 1999) from the Director of
Transportation Services, District 4, recommending that:
(1) the stopping regulations identified in Appendix 1 of this report be adopted;
(2) the appropriate by-law be amended accordingly;
(3) the existing on-street parking restrictions on Nelson Street remain unchanged;
(4) copies of this report be sent to the Toronto Board of Education, and Cedarbrook
Junior Public School for their information; and
(5) a copy of this report be sent to the Toronto Police Service, Parking Enforcement
Unit requesting selective enforcement of the existing parking regulations near
Cedarbrook Junior Public School.
On a motion by Councillor Duguid, the Community Council deferred the
aforementioned report to its next regular meeting scheduled to be held on
April 28, 1999.
(Clause No. 20(d), Report No. 4)
4.6 Request for an All-way Stop Control on
Centennial Road at Conference Boulevard/Clemes Drive
Ward 16 - Scarborough Highland Creek
The Community Council had before it a report (March 10, 1999) from the Director of
Transportation Services, District 4, advising Community Council on the results of the all-
way stop control warrant studies conducted at the intersection of Centennial Road and
Conference Boulevard/Clemes Drive, and recommending that this report be received for
information.
On a motion by Councillor Moeser, the Community Council deferred
consideration of the aforementioned report to its meeting scheduled to be
held on June 23, 1999.
(Clause No. 20(e), Report No. 4)
4.7 Traffic Concerns at Morrish Public School
on Canmore Boulevard
Ward 16 - Scarborough Highland Creek
The Community Council had before it a report (March 11, 1999) from the Director of
Transportation Services, District 4, recommending that:
(1) the stopping regulations identified in Appendix 1 of this report be adopted; and
(2) the appropriate by-law be amended accordingly.
On a motion by Councillor Moeser, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 3, Report No. 4)
4.8 Stop Control on Earlton Road at Araman Drive
Ward 17 - Scarborough Agincourt
The Community Council had before it a report (March 11, 1999) from the Director of
Transportation Services, District 4, recommending that:
(1) the stop sign identified in Appendix 1 of this report be adopted; and
(2) the appropriate by-law be amended accordingly.
On a motion by Councillor Shaw, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 4, Report No. 4)
4.9 U-turn Prohibition on Milner Avenue at Progress Avenue
Ward 18 - Scarborough Malvern
The Community Council had before it a report (March 11, 1999) from the Director of
Transportation Services, District 4, recommending that:
(1) the No U-Turn prohibition identified in Appendix 1 of this report be adopted; and
(2) the appropriate by-law be amended accordingly.
On a motion by Councillor Cho, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 5, Report No. 4)
4.10 Installation of No Ball Playing Signs
The Community Council had before it a report (March 11, 1999) from the Director of
Transportation Services, District 4, recommending that the previous practice in
Scarborough of not installing signs on streets to state the blanket prohibition of road
sports be continued in the Scarborough Community Area.
A. Councillor Ashton moved that the Deputy Chief, East District, be requested to
report to Scarborough Community Council on the protocol for enforcement of No
Ball Playing on City streets.
B. Councillor Ron Moeser moved that the report of the Director of Transportation
Services, East District, be received and the option to install No Ball Playing
signs in the future be retained by Scarborough Community Council.
Upon the question of the adoption of Motion A. by Councillor Ahston, it was carried.
Upon the question of the adoption of Motion B. by Councillor Moeser, the vote was taken,
as follows:
Yeas: Councillors Altobello, Ashton, Balkissoon, Cho, Mahood, Moeser, Tzekas -7
Nays: Councillors Berardinetti, Duguid, Faubert -3
Decided in the affirmative by a majority of 4.
(Clause No. 20(f), Report No. 4)
4.11 Sign Variance Request
Shoppers Drug Mart, 629 Markham Road
Ward 16 - Scarborough Highland Creek
The Community Council had before it a report (March 8, 1999) from the Deputy Chief
Building Official, East District, recommending that City Council not grant a variance to
permit the installation of a box type wall sign on the building located at 629 Markham
Road. On a motion by Councillor Moeser, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
Mr. Dave Smallwood, representing Shoppers Drug Mart, appeared before the Community Council
in connection with the foregoing matter.
(Clause No. 6, Report No. 4)
4.12 Sign Variance Request
Coffee Time, 4447 Sheppard Avenue East
Ward 18 - Scarborough Malvern
The Community Council had before it a report (March 8, 1999) from the Deputy Chief
Building Official, East District, recommending that City Council not grant a variance to
permit an additional wall sign on the Coffee Time building at 4447 Sheppard Avenue East.
On a motion by Councillor Balkissoon, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
The following persons appeared before the Community Council in connection with the
foregoing matter:
- Mr. Doug Jackett, Signage Systems, on behalf of Coffee Time Inc., who tabled a
communication respecting this matter, a copy of which was provided to all Members
of the Community Council, and a copy thereof is on file in the Office of the City
Clerk, Scarborough Civic Centre; and
- Ms. Eva Gnissos, Coffee Time Inc.
(Clause No. 7, Report No. 4)
4.13 Property Standards Issues at 21 Saunders Road
Daniel Haubold
Ward 13 - Scarborough Bluffs
The Community Council had before it a report (March 1, 1999) from the Director of
Municipal Licencing and Standards recommending that the Municipal Licencing and Standards
District Manager, East District, be directed to proceed with enforcement of Zoning By-law
10010, as amended, and By-law 24222, as amended, at premises municipally known as 21
Saunders Road.
A. Councillor Ashton moved that:
(1) the Director of Municipal Licencing and Standards be authorized to spend up
to $10,000.00 to deal with this situation and report back to Scarborough
Community Council in the event additional monies are required;
(2) the Executive Director of Municipal Licencing and Standards be
requested to report to the Urban Environment and Development
Committee and Council:
(a) on the adequacy of the Property Standards By-law to respond
to property standards abuses;
(b) on the adequacy of the powers provided to the courts
to respond to local property standards abuses; and
(c) to recommend changes to provincial legislation to
address the powers of municipalities to respond to
property standards abuses.
B. Councillor Faubert moved that the motion of Councillor Ashton be amended by
adding:
That all costs of the clean-up be levied against the homeowner as taxes.
Upon the question of the adoption of Motion A. by Councillor Ashton, it was carried.
Upon the question of the adoption of Motion B. by Councillor Faubert, it was carried.
Ms. Delia Roy-Ivaria appeared before the Community Council in connection with the
foregoing matter, and provided a videotape, which was viewed by Community Council members,
illustrating the property standards issues at this address.
The Community Council also received two communications respecting this issue:
(1) from Adrian Shaikh, Solicitor, on behalf of Daniel Haubold, requesting deferral of
this issue due to his inability to attend the Community Council meeting; and
(2) from Daniel Haubold, requesting deferral due to his inability to attend the
meeting;
copies of which were provided to all Members of the Community Council, and a copy thereof
is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, Scarborough Civic Centre.
(Clause No. 8, Report No. 4)
4.14 Request for Fence By-law Exemption
Bruce Cossar and Laurie Vogan
34 Allangrove Crescent
Ward 14 - Scarborough Wexford
The Community Council had before it a report (February 2, 1999) from the Director of
Municipal Licencing and Standards recommending that, owing to a lack of resolution as to
the location of the fence, Council not approve the request from the owners of 34
Allangrove Crescent for an exemption to the Fence By-law.
On a motion by Councillor Tzekas, the Community Council deferred this
matter for consideration at its next regular meeting scheduled to be held
on April 28, 1999, to permit further consultation with the community.
The Community Council also received a communication (February 18, 1999) addressed to the
Municipal Standards Division from Mr. Ray Chambers, landscape contractor, respecting this
issue, a copy of which was provided to all Members of the Community Council and a copy
thereof is on file in the Office of the City Clerk, Scarborough Civic Centre.
(Clause No. 20(g), Report No. 4)
4.15 Preliminary Evaluation Report
Official Plan Amendment Application SP1999001
Zoning By-law Amendment Application SZ1999003
Navroz Hoteliers Inc., 2121 Kingston Road
Cliffside Community
Ward 13 - Scarborough Bluffs
The Community Council had before it a report (March 9, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that staff process these applications in
the normal manner and that Scarborough Community Council convene a Public Meeting,
targeted for the third quarter of 1999, subject to:
(1) staff conducting a Community Information Meeting with a standard notice area of
120 metres (400 feet) from the subject property, and to the local Community
Association; the date of the Community Information Meeting to be determined in
consultation with the Ward Councillors; and
(2) staff providing Notice of the Public Meeting to all property owners within 120
metres (400 feet) of the property.
On a motion by Councillor Ashton, the Scarborough Community Council
approved the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(h), Report No. 4)
4.16 Preliminary Evaluation Report
Zoning By-law Amendment Application SZ1998035
Shell Canada Limited, 1805 Victoria Park Avenue
Wexford Community
Ward 14 - Scarborough Wexford
The Community Council had before it a report (March 17, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that Scarborough Community Council convene
a Public Meeting to consider this application, targeted for the second quarter of 1999;
Notice of the Public Meeting to be provided to all properties within 120 metres (400 feet)
of the subject lands.
On a motion by Councillor Tzekas, the Scarborough Community Council
approved the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(i), Report No. 4)
4.17 Preliminary Evaluation Report
Official Plan Amendment Application P97009
Zoning By-law Amendment Application Z97027
the Omni At the City Centre Inc.
Ward 15 - Scarborough City Centre
The Community Council had before it a report (March 18, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that Scarborough Community Council direct
the Director of Community Planning, East District, to:
(1) convene a Community Information Meeting; Notice for this meeting to be provided to
the nearby Community Associations, residents within the Omni development, and
residents south of Ellesmere Road who live within 120 metres (400 feet) of the
site; in consultation with the local Ward Councillors;
(2) require the applicant to submit the following studies in support of these
applications: Site Plan Control, Traffic Study, Pedestrian Wind Level Study and
Hydrogeological/Soils Study;
(3) process the applications in the normal manner and work with the applicant to
achieve a high quality site plan appropriate for the City Centre, having regard
for building location, massing, design and roof design to achieve the City Centre
Design objectives, including a strong identifiable image for the overall Omni
development and to provide an attractive addition to the Scarborough City Centre
skyline; and
(4) report back with a Status Report to Scarborough Community Council on the items
listed above, prior to scheduling the Public Meeting at Community Council.
Councillor Duguid moved that the foregoing report be approved, subject to
deleting Recommendation No. (4) contained therein, viz:
(4) report back with a Status Report to Scarborough Community
Council on the items listed above, prior to scheduling the
Public Meeting at Community Council.
Upon the question of the adoption of the foregoing motion, it was carried.
(Clause No. 20(j), Report No. 4)
4.18 Preliminary Evaluation Report
Zoning By-law Amendment Application SZ1999001
734554 Ontario Limited, 1255 Markham Road
Woburn Community
Ward 16 - Scarborough Highland Creek
The Community Council had before it a report (March 3, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that the Scarborough Community Council
convene a Public Meeting, targeted for the second quarter of 1999, subject to:
(1) staff convening a Community Information Meeting, in consultation with the Ward
Councillors; and
(2) staff providing Notice of the meeting to all properties within 120 metres (400
feet) of the property.
On a motion by Councillor Faubert, the Scarborough Community Council
approved the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(k), Report No. 4)
4.19 Preliminary Evaluation Report
Zoning By-law Amendment Application SZ1999005
Dr. Jarmila Filipko, 3717 Sheppard Avenue East
Tam O Shanter Community
Ward 17 - Scarborough Agincourt
The Community Council had before it a report (March 16, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that Scarborough Community Council convene
a Public Meeting to consider this application, targeted for the second quarter of 1999,
subject to:
(1) staff convening a meeting with the applicant and the owners of the five adjacent
single family properties to review the proposal and discuss future land assembly
and redevelopment opportunities for this area; and
(2) the applicant submitting a Site Plan Control Application for the proposal.
On a motion by Councillor Mahood, the Scarborough Community Council
deferred the aforementioned report to the next meeting scheduled to be held
on April 28, 1999, to permit further consultation with the community.
(Clause No. 20(l), Report No. 4)
4.20 Request for Direction
Zoning By-law Amendment Application Z95032
Proposed Modification to Zoning By-law 750-1998
Aspen Ridge Homes (Markham Gardens) Inc.
18 Rosebank Drive at Markham Road
Malvern Community
Ward 18 - Scarborough Malvern
The Community Council had before it a report (March 12, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that City Council direct:
(a) the City Clerk to issue Notice of the pending Ontario Municipal Board Hearing of
By-law 750-1998 to all persons who have been notified of passing of the by-law,
with provision for the Board s consideration of Multiple Family (Townhouse)
Residential (MF) Zone on Block 3, Registered Plan 66M-2300, including Performance
Standard 405; and
(b) the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to support the proposed modification at
the Hearing.
On a motion by Councillor Balkissoon, the Community Council recommended to
City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 9, Report No. 4)
4.21 Condominium Application SC98605
Harmony Developments II Inc.
9420-9466 Sheppard Avenue East and 2 Hedge End Road
Rouge Community
Ward 18 - Scarborough Malvern
The Community Council had before it a report (March 2, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that City Council support the Draft Plan
of Condominium SC98605 by Harmony Developments II Inc., with respect to the lands on the
north side of Sheppard Avenue East and Hedge End Road, being Blocks 2 and 5, Registered
Plan 66M-2308, known municipally as 9420-9466 Sheppard Avenue East and 2 Hedge End Road,
subject to the conditions detailed in the Director s report.
On a motion by Councillor Balkissoon, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 10, Report No. 4)
4.22 Part Lot Control Exemption Application SL1999001
Mondeo Developments Inc., 740 Ellesmere Road
Dorset Park Community
Ward 14 - Scarborough Wexford
The Community Council had before it a report (March 12, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that City Council:
(1) enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to Lots 1 - 107, inclusive,
on Registered Plan 66M-2330;
(2) deem that this Part Lot Control Exemption By-law shall expire one year from the
date of the passing of the By-law; and
(3) authorize any unsubstantive, technical, stylistic or format changes to the
Exemption By-law as may be required to give effect thereto.
On a motion by Councillor Tzekas, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 11, Report No. 4)
4.23 Former Scarborough Transportation Corridor
Lands Study - Phase 4 - Markham Road to Morningside Avenue
Draft Terms of Reference (W95014)
Guildwood and Scarborough Village Communities
Ward 13 - Scarborough Bluffs
The Community Council had before it a report (March 12, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that City Council direct the Director of
Community Planning, East District, in consultation with the staff of other appropriate
City Departments, to initiate an Official Plan and Zoning By-law review in accordance with
the attached Draft Terms of Reference.
Councillor Ashton moved that the foregoing report be approved, subject to requesting the
Director of Community Planning, East District, to investigate existing woodlots within
this corridor and the potential application of the description Woodlot within the
Official Plan.
Upon the question of the adoption of the foregoing motion, it was carried.
(Clause No. 12, Report No. 4)
4.24 Removal of a Holding Symbol (H)
Zoning By-law Amendment Application SZ98019
699401 Ontario Limited, 772 Warden Avenue
Golden Mile Employment District
Ward 13 - Scarborough Bluffs
The Community Council had before it a report (February 8, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that City Council:
(1) amend the Employment Districts Zoning By-Law No. 24982, as amended, with respect
to the Golden Mile Employment District, for the lands located on the west side of
Warden Avenue, south of Eglinton Avenue, being Lots D and L, Registered Plan
3928, known municipally as 772 Warden Avenue, to partially remove the Holding
Provision (H) to permit a maximum of 4,100 square metres (44,100 square feet) of
commercial space under the existing Mixed Employment Zone (ME); and
(2) authorize such unsubstantive, stylistic or format changes to the Zoning By-Law as
may be necessary to give effect to this resolution.
On a motion by Councillor Altobello, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 13, Report No. 4)
4.25 New Applications - All Scarborough Wards
The Community Council had before it a report (March 15, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, advising Community Council of the new applications
received during the six-week period ending March 10, 1999, and recommending that this
report be received for information.
On a motion by Councillor Balkissoon, the Scarborough Community Council
received the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(o), Report No. 4)
4.26 Site Plan Control Approvals - All Scarborough Wards
The Community Council had before it a report (March 12, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, advising Community Council of the Site Plan Control
Approvals granted by the Director, and recommending that this report be received for
information.
On a motion by Councillor Balkissoon, the Scarborough Community Council
received the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(p), Report No. 4)
4.27 Consent Applications - All Scarborough Wards
The Community Council had before it a report (March 12, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, advising Community Council of the Consent Decisions
granted by the Director, and recommending that this report be received for information.
On a motion by Councillor Faubert, the Scarborough Community Council
received the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(q), Report No. 4)
4.28 Ontario Municipal Board Hearings - All Scarborough Wards
The Community Council had before it a report (March 12, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, advising Community Council of the status of current
appeals to the Ontario Municipal Board, and recommending that this report be received for
information.
Councillor Mahood moved that the foregoing report be received subject to adding a
direction that the City Solicitor forward a request to the Ontario Municipal Board that
the hearing with respect to Application No. SP1998015, SZ1998027 and SS1998104, Shell
Canada, 2650 Brimley Road, Agincourt North Community, be convened at the Scarborough Civic
Centre, in order to accommodate attendance by the local residents.
Upon the question of the adoption of the foregoing motion, it was carried.
(Clause No. 20(r), Report No. 4)
4.29 Ontario Municipal Board Decision
573 Meadowvale Road
Ward 16 - Scarborough Highland Creek
The Community Council had before it a report (March 3, 1999) from the City Solicitor
advising of an Ontario Municipal Board Order granting a Zoning By-law Variance and Consent
to Convey with respect to No. 573 Meadowvale Road, and recommending that this report be
received for information.
On a motion by Councillor Moeser, the Scarborough Community Council
received the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(s), Report No. 4)
4.30 Ontario Municipal Board Decision
50 Nashdene Road, Unit 105
Ward 18 - Scarborough Malvern
The Community Council had before it a report (March 10, 1999) from the City Solicitor
advising Community Council of an Ontario Municipal Board Decision on a Variance appeal
respecting 50 Nashdene Road, Unit 105, and recommending that this report be received for
information.
On a motion by Councillor Balkissoon, the Scarborough Community Council
received the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(t), Report No. 4)
4.31 Liquor Licencing Information Form
Inclined Restaurant, 1375 Danforth Road, Unit 1
Ward 15 - Scarborough City Centre
The Community Council had before it a report (March 18, 1999) from the City Clerk
recommending:
(1) that Scarborough Community Council approve either Option (a) or Option (b), viz:
(a) support the issuance of the liquor licence to Inclined Restaurant, with
conditions; or
(b) object to the issuance of the liquor licence to Inclined Restaurant; and
(2) that the City Clerk or designate be authorized to complete and sign the Municipal
Information form and forward the form with City Council s decision to the Alcohol
and Gaming Commission.
A. Councillor Duguid moved that Recommendation No. (1) contained in the report from
the City Clerk dated March 18, 1999 be struck out; and the following be
substituted therefor: that the Scarborough Community Council deem the issuance of
this Liquor Licence to be contrary to the public interest and recommend to City
Council that the City Solicitor be directed to attend the hearing on this Liquor
Licence application in opposition to the Application.
B. Councillor Ashton moved that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and
Standards, be requested to report directly to the Council meeting of April 13,
1999 respecting mitigating measures against the residents concerns, e.g. hours of
operation.
C. Councillor Altobello moved that the City Clerk provide to the Council meeting of
April 13, 1999, the background information from the Toronto Police Service
respecting this location, including their opinion as to whether this licence
should be granted.
Upon the question of the adoption of Motion A. by Councillor Duguid, it was carried.
Upon the question of the adoption of Motion B. by Councillor Ashton, it was carried.
Upon the question of the adoption of Motion C. by Councillor Altobello, it was carried.
Upon the question of the adoption of the foregoing report, as amended, it was carried.
The following persons appeared before the Community Council in connection with the
foregoing matter:
- Mr. Conrad Bennett, Legal Assistant, on behalf of Inclined Restaurant, who tabled
with the Committee Administrator, a copy of a petition containing 60 signatures in
support of the granting of this liquor licence; and a copy thereof is on file in
the Office of the City Clerk, Scarborough Civic Centre; and
- Mr. Henry Thompson, owner, Inclined Restaurant.
(Clause No. 19, Report No. 4)
4.32 Appointment to the Scarborough Block Parent Program
Representative of the Scarborough Community Council
The Community Council had before it a communication (March 17, 1999) from Mr. Wayne
Tulley, Director, Scarborough Block Parent Program, requesting that the Community Council
appoint its representative to the Scarborough Block Parent Program.
On a motion moved by Councillor Faubert, the Scarborough Community Council
appointed the Chair or his designate as its representative to the
Scarborough Block Parent Program.
(Clause No. 20(x), Report No. 4)
4.33 First Nations Cemetery Within Tabor Hill Park
Ward 15 - Scarborough City Centre
The Community Council had before it a report (March 22, 1999) from the Commissioner of
Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, recommending that staff continue to work with
the First Nations Representatives, community members and Ward 15 Councillors on two
events celebrating native history and culture, i.e., National Aboriginal Day on June 10,
1999 in the Albert Campbell Square, and a Sunrise Ceremony on June 12, 1999 at Tabor Hill
Park.
On a motion by Councillor Duguid, the Scarborough Community Council
approved the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(y), Report No. 4)
4.34 Ontario Municipal Board Decision
Minor Variance and Consent Appeals
No. 128 Scarboro Avenue
Ward 16 - Scarborough Highland Creek
The Community Council had before it a report (March 18, 1999) from the City Solicitor,
advising the outcome of the Ontario Municipal Hearing respecting 128 Scarboro Avenue and
recommending that this report be received for information.
On a motion by Councillor Moeser, the Scarborough Community Council
received the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(u), Report No. 4)
4.35 Ontario Municipal Board Decision
Minor Variance Appeal
Shell Canada, 2801 Midland Avenue
Ward 17 - Scarborough Agincourt
The Community Council had before it a report (March 19, 1999) from the City Solicitor,
advising the outcome of the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing respecting 2801 Midland Avenue
and recommending that this report be received for information.
On a motion by Councillor Shaw, the Scarborough Community Council received
the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(v), Report No. 4)
4.36 Preliminary Evaluation Report
Zoning By-law Amendment Application SZ1999002
Site Plan Control Application SS1999012
Jesk Enterprises Ltd.
Tapscott Employment District
Ward 18 - Scarborough Malvern
The Community Council had before it a report (March 18, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that Scarborough Community Council direct
staff to process these applications in the normal manner.
On a motion by Councillor Balkissoon, the Scarborough Community Council
approved the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(m), Report No. 4)
4.37 Request for Direction
Appeal by the University of Toronto
Ontario Municipal Board Hearing
Scarborough Official Plan Amendment No. 988
Ward 16 - Scarborough Highland Creek
The Community Council had before it a report (March 22, 1999) from the Director of
Community Planning, East District, recommending that Scarborough Community Council direct
the Director of Community Planning, East District, to:
(1) convene a community information meeting of community associations, residents and
property owners within the area bounded on the north by Highway 401 on the south
by the Highland Creek, and 300 metres (1,000 feet) east and west of the subject
lands, and to report back to Scarborough Community Council at its meeting of April
28 to 29, 1999 with recommendations for a City position to be taken at the May 31,
1999 OMB hearing; and
(2) continue to meet with the representatives of the University of Toronto in
revising their proposed Official Plan amendment to incorporate a land use map and
policy statements at an appropriate level of detail.
On a motion by Councillor Moeser, the Scarborough Community Council
approved the aforementioned report.
The Scarborough Community Council also received:
(1) a supplementary report (March 29, 1999) from the Director of Community Planning,
East District, providing additional background information respecting the
abovementioned report; and
(2) a communication (March 26, 1999) from Mr. Stanley M. Makuch, Solicitor, Cassels
Brock and Blackwell, on behalf of the University of Toronto;
copies of which were provided to all Members of Community Council, and a copy thereof is
on file in the Office of the City Clerk, Scarborough Civic Centre.
Mr. Stanley M. Makuch, Solicitor, appeared before the Community Council in connection with
the foregoing matter and expressed support, on behalf of the University of Toronto, for
the staff recommendations.
(Clause No. 20(n), Report No. 4)
4.38 Nominations for Individual of the Year, Group of the Year,
and Recreation Citations for the 43rd Annual
Recreation Recognition Night, May 28, 1999
At this point in the proceedings, the Community Council recessed to meet in camera.
The Community Council had before it a confidential report (March 22, 1999) from the
Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, proposing the recipients for
the Recreation Recognition Night Awards and recommending approval thereof.
On a motion by Councillor Altobello, the Community Council extended beyond
12:30 p.m. to complete the foregoing item in camera.
(See also Minute No. 4.51)
(Clause No. 20(z), Report No. 4)
The Community Council recessed at 12:45 p.m.
The Community Council reconvened at 2:00 p.m. in public session.
Members present:
Councillor Lorenzo Berardinetti, Chair
Councillor Gerry Altobello
Councillor Brian Ashton
Councillor Bas Balkissoon
Councillor Raymond Cho
Councillor Brad Duguid
Councillor Frank Faubert
Councillor Doug Mahood
Councillor Ron Moeser
Councillor Sherene Shaw
Councillor Mike Tzekas
4.39 Zoning By-law Amendment Application SZ98031
Part Lot Control By-law Amendment Application SP98008
Stephen Washington Foundation/Trustees of
Washington Methodist Church - Scarboro
3741 Kingston Road - Guildwood Community
Ward 13 - Scarborough Bluffs
The Community Council conducted a statutory public meeting, in accordance with Section 17
and Section 34 of The Planning Act; appropriate notice of this meeting having been given
in accordance with The Planning Act and the regulations thereunder; and had before it a
report (February 9, 1999) from the Director of Community Planning, East District,
recommending that City Council:
(A) Zoning By-law:
amend the Guildwood Community Zoning By-law No. 9676, as amended, with respect to
Part of Lot 1, Registered Plan 2425 and Lots 19 and 20, Registered Plan 3136,
known municipally as 3741 Kingston Road, by deleting the Highway Commercial
zoning and replacing it as follows:
Crestwood Drive Frontage
To be zoned Single-Family Residential (S) with the following Performance
Standards:
(1) one Single-Family Dwelling per parcel of land having a minimum frontage of
11 metres (36 feet) on a public street and a minimum area of 335 square
metres (3,600 square feet);
(2) minimum front yard building setback 3 metres (10 feet) from the street
line;
(3) minimum side yard setback 3 metres (10 feet) on one side and .3 metres
(1 foot) on the other side;
(4) minimum 6 metres (20 feet) rear yard setback for dwellings;
(5) a detached garage in the rear yard shall be provided with each dwelling
unit;
(6) maximum building coverage 40 percent of the lot area.
Kingston Road Frontage (Including Part 5 on Figure 3):
To be zoned Street Townhouse Residential (ST) in a new Street Townhouse
Residential zone restricting uses to Street Townhouse Dwellings and Single-
Family Dwellings only with the following Performance Standards:
(1) notwithstanding the future division of this site into one or more parcels,
a maximum of two Single-Family Dwellings and eleven Street Townhouse
Dwelling units shall be permitted;
(2) minimum front yard building setback 3 metres (10 feet) from Kingston Road;
(3) maximum building height excluding basements: 3 storeys and 13.5 metres (45
feet);
(4) maximum building coverage 50 percent of the lot or parcel area;
(5) minimum rear yard setback 7.5 metres (25 feet) for Street Townhouse
Dwelling units;
(6) a garage shall be provided with each dwelling unit;
(B) Part Lot Control Exemption
(1) enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to Part of Lot 1,
Registered Plan 2425 and Lots 19 and 20, Registered Plan 3136, known
municipally as 3741 Kingston Road, applying to the lands shown on Figure 3;
(2) deem that the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law shall expire one (1) year
from the date of the passing of the By-law; and
(3) direct that, prior to Council passing the Part Lot Control Exemption By-
law, the owner shall register against title, a restriction satisfactory to
the City Solicitor, whereby no transfer or charge of the subject lands or
any part thereof shall be made without the consent of the Director of
Community Planning, East District;
(4) direct that, prior to the Director of Community Planning, East District s
consent, the applicant demonstrate to the City through the appropriate
legal instrument(s) that mutual easements for access and servicing will be
granted to the appropriate property-owners in the development and that a
maintenance agreement has been registered against the appropriate titles;
(C) Miscellaneous:
authorize such unsubstantive, technical, stylistic or format changes to the Zoning
and Part Lot Control Exemption By-laws as may be required to properly carry out
the intent of this resolution; and
(D) Site Plan Control:
delete the portion of the property proposed to be zoned Single-Family
Residential from Site Plan Control.
On a motion by Councillor Altobello, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
Mr. George Kuzmarov, the applicant, appeared before the Community Council in connection
with the foregoing matter, and expressed support for the staff recommendation.
(Clause No. 14, Report No. 4)
4.40 Official Plan Amendment Application P97019
Zoning By-law Amendment Application Z97051
Coffee Time Donuts Inc., 441 Ellesmere Road
Wexford Employment District
Ward 14 - Scarborough Wexford
The Community Council conducted a statutory public meeting, in accordance with Section 17
and Section 34 of The Planning Act; appropriate notice of this meeting having been given
in accordance with The Planning Act and the regulations thereunder; and had before it a
report (February 23, 1999) from the Director of Community Planning, East District,
recommending that City Council:
(A) Official Plan:
amend the Wexford Employment District Secondary Plan with respect to the Coffee
Time Donuts Inc., lands, known municipally as 441 Ellesmere Road, by adding the
following Numbered Policy to the current General Industrial Uses with High
Performance Standards designation:
South side of Ellesmere Road, east of Warden Avenue
Office Uses are permitted in addition to the General Industrial Uses with High
Performance Standards designation on this site. ;
(B) Zoning By-law:
amend the Employment Districts Zoning By-law No. 24982 (Wexford), as amended, with
respect to Part of Lot 32, Concession 1, known municipally as 441 Ellesmere Road,
by deleting the current Industrial (M) and General Industrial (MG) zoning and
replacing it with Mixed Employment (ME) zoning as follows:
(1) Permitted Uses:
Mixed Employment Zone (ME) permitting the following uses:
(a) Day Nurseries;
(b) Educational and Training Facility Uses;
(c) Financial Institutions;
(d) Industrial Uses;
(e) Offices;
(f) Personal Service Shops;
(g) Places of Worship;
(h) Recreational Uses;
(i) Restaurants;
(j) Retail Stores;
(2) Performance Standards:
2.1 maximum total gross floor area of all retail stores, personal
service shops, and restaurants shall not exceed 1,900 square metres
(20,500 square feet);
2.2 maximum total gross floor area of all restaurants shall not exceed
630 square metres (6,780 square feet);
2.3 parking for Educational and Training Facility Uses, including those
associated with an on-site restaurant, shall be provided on the
basis of a minimum of three parking spaces per 100 square metres
(1,076 square feet) of gross floor area;
2.4 parking for Offices shall be provided on the basis of a minimum of
2.5 parking spaces per 100 square metres (1,076 square feet) of the
following: gross floor area minus the gross floor area of main
floor public lobbies and main floor public walkways;
(3) retain the existing Performance Standards that currently apply to the
subject lands which include a maximum gross floor area of 0.75 times the
lot area, minimum street and side yard building setbacks of 3 metres (10
feet), and a minimum rear yard setback of 4.5 metres (15 feet); and
(C) authorize such unsubstantive technical, stylistic or format changes as may be
necessary to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to properly carry out the intent
of this resolution.
A. Councillor Tzekas moved that the report (February 23, 1999) from the Director,
Community Planning, East District, be approved.
B. Councillor Mahood moved that the motion of Councillor Tzekas be amended as
follows:
Recommendation B(2) Add under Performance Standards
2.5 maximum 0.48 square metres gross floor area of retail stores, personal
service shops and restaurants permitted for every 1 square metre of built
gross floor area.
Upon the question of the adoption of Motion A. by Councillor Tzekas, it was carried.
Upon the question of the adoption of Motion B. by Councillor Mahood, it was carried.
The following persons appeared before the Community Council in connection with the
foregoing matter:
- Mr. William Au, William Au Associates Architects, on behalf of the applicant,
expressing support for the staff recommendation; and
- Mr. James Okawa, Brutto Consulting, representing Canadian Mill Supply, the
neighbouring landowner, expressing support for the staff recommendation, and
advising Community Council that his client will also be submitting an application
to expand the commercial uses on his site.
The Community Council also received a memorandum from Councillor Norm Kelly expressing his
support for the staff recommendation and urging other Members of Community Council to
recommend approval of this application, a copy of which was provided to all Members of the
Community Council, and a copy thereof is on file in the Office of the City Clerk,
Scarborough Civic Centre.
(Clause No. 15, Report No. 4)
4.41 Zoning By-law Amendment Application Z97059
1960 Eglinton Developments Ltd. and
New Fin Land Development Co. Ltd.
1960 Eglinton Avenue East
Golden Mile Employment District
Ward 14 - Scarborough Wexford
The Community Council conducted a statutory public meeting, in accordance with Section 17
and Section 34 of The Planning Act; appropriate notice of this meeting having been given
in accordance with The Planning Act and the regulations thereunder; and had before it a
report (February 8, 1999) from the Director of Community Planning, East District,
recommending that City Council:
(1) amend the Employment Districts Zoning By-Law No. 24982, as amended, with respect
to the Golden Mile Employment District, for the lands located at the northeast
corner of Eglinton and Warden Avenues, being Part of Lots 3 and 4, Registered
Plan 4087, known municipally as 1960 Eglinton Avenue, to delete the existing
Industrial Zone (M) and General Industrial Zone (MG) zoning, replacing it with a
Mixed Employment Zone (ME) with the following specific provisions:
(1) Permitted Uses:
1.1 Mixed Employment Zone (ME)
1.2 The following additional uses are permitted:
- Hotels;
- Places of Entertainment;
- Games Arcades;
- Service Shops;
- Vehicle Service Garages ancillary to Retail Stores;
- Open Storage ancillary to Retail Stores;
(2) Performance Standards:
2.1 the gross floor area of all buildings shall not exceed 0.45 times
the area of the lot;
2.2 the gross floor area of all Retail Stores, Financial Institutions,
Personal Service Shops, Service Shops, Restaurants and Places
of Entertainment shall not exceed 13,200 square metres
(142,000 square feet);
2.3 the gross floor area of all or any parts of any Retail Store
dedicated to the sale of food shall not exceed a cumulative total
of 700 square metres (7,500 square feet);
2.4 minimum building setback from all lot lines 3 metres (10 feet);
2.5 open storage and display of goods, in conjunction with a Retail
Store, shall be permitted within 30 metres (100 feet) of a main
wall;
2.6 the provisions of this By-Law shall apply collectively to this
land, notwithstanding its future division into two or more parcels
of land; and
(2) authorize such unsubstantive, stylistic or format changes to the Zoning By-Law as
may be necessary to give effect to this resolution.
On a motion by Councillor Tzekas, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
The Community Council also had before it the following communication (March 5, 1999) from
S.A. Armstrong Limited:
We have reviewed the proposed change to zoning on the captioned lands and S.A. Armstrong
Limited has a number of concerns which do not seem to be addressed in the amendments. It
should be noted that S.A. Armstrong Limited is located on the shared and opposite side of
Ashtonbee Road.
1. Permitted Uses - The open and unspecified commercial uses for the lands is of
great concern to Armstrong. Ten years ago, Armstrong moved from an industrial
area which had become eroded with commercial uses to Scarborough for the purposes
of being in an industrial zone. We are now being asked to consider further
erosion of the current industrial zone. The Roller Rink, and now Bowling Lanes,
across from our property at Bertrand Avenue, as you know, has created problems for
both industrial and residential users alike. Approval on the captioned site
should be granted only for specific use after full study into the impact and
appropriateness of such use has been conducted. Clearly, uses such as a games
arcade and service station would be inappropriate from our point of view.
2. Road Access - We are further concerned about the road access to the site which
shows ingress and egress at two new places on Ashtonbee which would compete and
could be potentially dangerous when combined with our current and future
industrial trucking use. Ashtonbee is already inappropriately used for community
college parking. This not only creates congestion but potentially dangerous
ingress and egress.
3. Performance Standards - The performance standards are difficult to interpret
without some clearer idea of use. However, the setback provisions are totally
inadequate and the open display of goods and outside storage of goods as a retail
use on the industrial boulevard is totally inappropriate.
4. Application to the Entire Property - The amendment is written so as to apply to
the entire property even though the use for commercial is to be limited. This
form of mixed planning is not consistent with the official plan and leaves the way
open for total commercial use of the lands in the future.
In summary, Armstrong is concerned with the continued industrial character of this area
and its appropriateness of compatible uses. With the scant information available on this
proposal and its impact, particularly in the abutting industrial zone, Armstrong would
like to make its objections and concerns known. Further, we wish to be advised and
notified of any further processing of this application as we intend to participate fully
in the discussion until our issues and concerns have been aired and hopefully addressed.
Mr. Phillip Wong, representing 1960 Eglinton Developments Limited, appeared before the
Community Council and expressed support for the staff recommendation.
(Clause No. 16, Report No. 4)
4.42 Zoning By-law Amendment Application SZ98034
Sherway Centre Limited, 55 Town Centre Court
Ward 15 - Scarborough City Centre
The Community Council conducted a statutory public meeting, in accordance with Section 17
and Section 34 of The Planning Act; appropriate notice of this meeting having been given
in accordance with The Planning Act and the regulations thereunder; and had before it a
report (February 8, 1999) from the Director of Community Planning, East District,
recommending that City Council:
(A) Zoning By-law:
amend the Employment Districts Zoning By-law No. 24982 (Progress), as amended,
with respect to the lands located at 55 Town Centre Court, being Part of Blocks I
and L, Registered Plan M-1410 as follows:
Additional Permitted Uses:
Educational and Training Facility Uses. ; and
(B) Miscellaneous:
authorize such unsubstantive, technical, stylistic or format changes to the Zoning
By-law as may be required to give effect to this resolution.
On a motion by Councillor Duguid, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
Mr. Ron Blake, on behalf of Sherway Centre Limited, appeared before Community Council in
connection with the foregoing matter and expressed support for the staff recommendation.
(Clause No. 17, Report No. 4)
4.43 Zoning By-law Amendment Application SZ98021
Arbroath Investments Inc., Maberley Crescent
Centennial Community
Ward 16 - Scarborough Highland Creek
The Community Council conducted a statutory public meeting, in accordance with Section 17
and Section 34 of The Planning Act; appropriate notice of this meeting having been given
in accordance with The Planning Act and the regulations thereunder; and had before it a
report (February 2, 1999) from the Director of Community Planning, East District,
recommending that City Council:
(1) amend the Centennial Community Zoning By-law No.1978, as amended, with respect to
the property outlined on Figure 1, being Block 120, Registered Plan 66M-2129, by
deleting the existing Zoning and replacing it with the Single-Family Residential
(S) Zone, with the following development standards:
Zoning By-law:
(a) one single-family dwelling per parcel of land with a minimum frontage of
8.7 metres at the building setback line, and a minimum lot area of 278
square metres;
(b) minimum front yard building setback 6 metres;
(c) minimum side yard 600 millimetres from each side;
(d) minimum rear yard 4.5 metres;
(e) ground floor area of all buildings shall not exceed 50 percent of the lot
area;
(f) chimneys, pilasters, projecting columns, balconies, unenclosed porches and
canopies shall not project into any required side yard of 1 metre or less;
(g) a garage (minimum inside dimensions of 2.7 metres by 5.7 metres) shall be
erected with each dwelling unit; and
(2) authorize such unsubstantive technical, stylistic, or format changes to the Zoning
By-law as may be required to properly carry out the intent of this resolution.
On a motion by Councillor Moeser, the Scarborough Community Council
recommended to City Council the adoption of the aforementioned report.
Mr. Fred Schaeffer, on behalf of Arbroath Investments Inc., appeared before the Community
Council in connection with the foregoing matter, and expressed support for the staff
recommendation.
(Clause No. 18, Report No. 4)
4.44 Ontario Municipal Board Decision
Application for Redesignation of Industrial Lands
Morningside Heights Landowners Group
Ward 18 - Scarborough Malvern
The Community Council had before it a report (March 19, 1999) from the City Solicitor,
advising the outcome of the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing respecting the above-noted
matter and recommending that this report be received for information.
On a motion by Councillor Mahood, the Scarborough Community Council
received the aforementioned report.
(Clause No. 20(w), Report No. 4)
4.45 Temporary Liquor Licences
On a motion by Councillor Mahood, the Scarborough Community Council requested that the
Commissioner, Urban Planning and Development Services, in conjunction with the City
Solicitor, report to Scarborough Community Council at its next meeting scheduled to be
held on April 28, 1999, on the issue of temporary Liquor Licences being issued to an
industrial unit with recreational users in Ward 17, Scarborough Agincourt, and the
problems associated therewith.
(Clause No. 20(dd), Report No. 4)
4.46 Committee of Adjustment
On a motion by Councillor Tzekas, the Scarborough Community Council requested that the
Director, Community Planning, East District, report to the Scarborough Community Council
as soon as possible, on the matter of the composition and mandate of the Committee of
Adjustment.
(Clause No. 20(ff), Report No. 4)
4.47 Winter Maintenance
The Community Council received a verbal briefing by the Director of Transportation
Services, District 4, with respect to the content of the report to be submitted to the
Works and Utilities Committee on the review of the winter maintenance program.
(Clause 20(bb), Report No. 4)
4.48 Harmonization of the Sign By-law across the new City of Toronto
On a motion by Councillor Shaw, the Scarborough Community Council requested that the
Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services to report to Scarborough Community
Council at the appropriate time on the matter of harmonization of the Sign By-laws and
department fees across the new City of Toronto.
(Clause No. 20(cc), Report No. 4)
4.49 Compost Give-away
On a motion by Councillor Shaw, the Scarborough Community Council requested that the Works
and Utilities Committee to re-establish the compost give-away days conducted by the former
City of Scarborough Council and direct the Commissioner, Works and Emergency Services, to
report to Scarborough Community Council on a method of accomplishing this event.
(Clause No. 20(ee), Report No. 4)
4.50 Residential Water Service Connection Repair Program
The Community Council had before it a report (March 26, 1999) from the Director of Quality
Control and System Planning, Water & Wastewater Services referring two reports (October
23, 1998) from the General Manager, Water and Wastewater Services, and (November 20, 1998)
from the Commissioner, Works and Emergency Services, both submitted to the Works and
Utilities Committee, respecting a harmonized Residential Water Service Connection Repair
Program which encompasses the categories: Breaks/Leaks, Standard Size of Water Service
Connection, Minimum Acceptable Flow, Water Service Cleaning and the Water Service
Connection Replacement/Upgrade Program, with the request that Community Council provide
its comments thereon to the Works and Utilities Committee meeting to be held on April 21,
1999.
Councillor Ashton moved that:
(1) the aforementioned reports be referred to the Works and Utilities Committee
without comment at this time;
(2) the General Manager, Water and Wastewater Services, be requested to submit a
report to the Works and Utilities Committee on the practice in the former City of
Scarborough compared to the proposals contained in these reports; and
(3) a copy of the General Manager s report be provided to all Members of the
Scarborough Community Council prior to the Works and Utilities Committee meeting
to be held on April 21, 1999.
Upon the question of the adoption of the foregoing Motion by Councillor Ashton, it was
carried.
(Clause No. 20(aa), Report No. 4)
The Community Council resolved itself to meet in camera to consider the following.
The Committee of the Whole rose and reported progress.
4.51 Nominations for Individual of the Year, Group of the Year,
and Recreation Citations for the 43rd Annual
Recreation Recognition Night, May 28, 1999
A. Councillor Mahood moved that:
(1) a Sub-committee be established, comprising the Chair and Councillors Cho,
Shaw and Tzekas, to consider the matter of recipients and categories for
the Recreation Awards and requested that it report back to a Special
Meeting of the Community Council for recommendation to City Council at its
April 13, 1999 meeting; and
(2) all motions made in camera be referred to the Sub-committee for its
consideration.
Upon the question of the adoption of the foregoing motion, it was carried.
(See Also Minute No. 4.38)
(Clause No. 20(z), Report No. 4)
4.52 Upon the question of adjournment of the Community Council meeting, the vote was taken, as
follows:
Yeas: Councillors Altobello, Ashton, Berardinetti, Balkissoon, Cho, Kelly, Shaw -7
Nays: Councillor Moeser -1
Decided in the affirmative by a majority of 6.
The Community Council adjourned its meeting at 4:10 p.m.
_______________________________
Chair
|
| |
|
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@toronto.ca. |
|
