Preliminary Evaluation Report
Zoning By-law Amendment Application SC-Z19990033
Aspen Ridge Homes (Markham Gardens) Inc.
Progress Avenue, South of Sheppard Avenue East
Malvern Community
(Ward 18 - Scarborough Malvern)
The Scarborough Community Council recommends that City Council:
(1) strike out the recommendations contained in the following report;
and
(2) refuse the Zoning By-law Amendment Application SC-Z19990033
by Aspen Ridge Homes (Markham Gardens) Inc., on the grounds
that it is premature.
The Scarborough Community Council submits the following report
(December 20, 1999) from the Director of Community Planning, East
District:
Purpose:

This report provides a preliminary
evaluation of a rezoning
application regarding Blocks 2 and
8, Registered Plan 66M-2300, and
seeks direction respecting
possible negotiations related to the
request to relocate 60 parking
spaces for the Scarborough
Community Complex. Both
properties are owned by Aspen
Ridge Homes (Markham Gardens)
Inc.
Financial Implications and Impact
Statement:
There are no financial implications at the present time. Should the City
decide to proceed with the negotiations with Aspen Ridge Homes, with
respect to the provision of 60 parking spaces for the Scarborough
Community Complex on Block 8 and the City acquiring Block 8, any
financial impact will depend on the market values and costs agreed
upon for various items involved in the negotiations.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that Council:
(1) direct City staff to undertake negotiations with Aspen Ridge
Homes (Markham Gardens) Inc. with respect to the provision of 60
parking spaces for the Scarborough Community Complex by
Aspen Ridge Homes on Block 8, instead of Block 2, and the City
acquiring Block 8, both blocks on Registered Plan 66M-2300. The
negotiations should include all parties having interest in various
agreements affecting these two blocks, such as Aspen Ridge
Homes (Markham Gardens) Inc., The Toronto Catholic District
School Board, The Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto Inc.,
and the City.
(2) direct staff to process this application in the normal manner,
subject to the applicant submitting the following:
(a) a Site Plan Control Application illustrating the proposed
development and its relationship with adjacent residential
housing and the City's facilities. The submission is to
include the proposed parking lot for 60 spaces for the
Scarborough Community Complex, and a report examining
the impact of the illumination the new proposal may have on
the adjacent residential development and recommending
appropriate mitigation measures;
(b) an Official Plan Amendment application to revise height and
distance restrictions relative to the building elements
exceeding 20 metres; and to permit a density increase above
the present cap of 1600 residential units, should the owner
wish to proceed with conventional apartment and/or
townhouse units; and
(c) a statement by the Toronto Catholic District School Board
advising as to how the children emanating from the Aspen
Ridge subdivision are going to be accommodated in the
Board's local elementary schools, if the proposed school is
not developed on Block 8; and
(3) convene a Public Meeting to consider these applications after the
above requirements have been satisfied with a target date for the
second quarter of 2000.
Background:
Block 8 is the subject of an Agreement of Purchase and Sale between
Aspen Ridge Homes and the Toronto Catholic District School Board
(TCDSB). This is an Agreement to secure a site for a separate school in
accordance with the subdivision approval conditions governing the
development of the Aspen Ridge lands. The proposed zoning to permit
Apartment and Multiple-Family Residential, Nursing Homes and Senior
Citizens' Apartments, in addition to the permitted Institutional-Private
and Public Recreational uses (IR), has been requested to allow for
private development. In addition, the proposal includes a provision of
60 parking spaces for the neighbouring Scarborough Community
Complex (SCC), should the TCDSB decide not to conclude the purchase
of the site. The applicant has advised that pursuant to the Agreement,
the TCDSB may conclude the transaction at any time and in any event
not later than December 31, 2000, or the completion of 900 dwelling
units within the subdivision, whichever comes first.
The TCDSB has indicated its agreement with the rezoning application,
provided the existing zoning allowing for schools and educational uses
is maintained on the property.
With respect to Block 2, Aspen Ridge Homes has requested that the
current zoning be amended to permit, but not require, the provision of
60 parking spaces for the SCC on this site.
Block 8 forms part of a comprehensive development, which includes
apartment and townhouse residential uses, offices, commercial,
separate school, transportation, community and park facilities. 450
townhouses have been constructed on three blocks between Markham
Road and Progress Avenue. Lands on the east side of Progress Avenue,
which surround Block 8, have been developed with the Scarborough
Community Complex (SCC) consisting of the Chinese Cultural Centre,
Burrows Hall Recreation Centre with a library, and Rosebank Park
(Figure 1). At the present time, the southerly section of the parking area
serving the SCC is located on a temporary basis on Block 8; as well, a
portion of the play area occupies the southerly end of the block. In
various development schemes presented in the past to Council and the
community, Block 8 was depicted as a future separate school site, with
shared parking and playground facilities.
Lands at the south-east quadrant of Sheppard and Progress Avenues
are designated Multiple Use Block (Policy 3.3) permitting High Density
Residential (Policy 3.2), Neighbourhood Commercial Uses and
Community Facilities, with the residential density not exceeding 150
units per net residential hectare. Notwithstanding, Policy 3.2 which
applies to high density residential uses within the subdivision, provides
for a maximum net residential density of 150 apartment and townhouse
units per hectare over lands so used to a maximum of 1600 units.
In order to achieve a variety of building heights and to respond to
adjacent uses, this density may be consolidated or transferred within
the designated lands, provided the owner of the lands that the density
is transferred from consents to such transfer, and provided the height
restrictions are maintained. Separate School and Day Nursery facilities
are permitted in this designation, and shall not be considered a part of
the maximum permissible gross floor area.
Neighbourhood Commercial Uses provide for a cluster of commercial
facilities serving local populations of up to 10,000 people within an
approximate 400 metre radius. At this location, the amount of
commercial space is restricted to 1,858 square metres.
The Community Facilities designation encompasses a wide range of
facilities which provide a service to the community, and which make up
an integral part of a neighbourhood or community. The permitted uses
include, among others, parks, schools, educational and recreational
facilities, libraries, hospitals, specialized residential care facilities,
nursing homes, fraternal organizations and places of worship.
The site-specific policy restricts building height to a maximum of 20
metres, with the exception of decorative roof elements, which together
with the building shall not exceed 26 metres. The said decorative roof
elements shall not be closer than 100 metres from the east property line,
39 metres from the north property line and 39 metres from the west
property line. Prior to rezoning, lighting studies shall be done, the
results of which are to be to the satisfaction of the City with respect to
the decorative roof elements.
Lands on the east side of Progress Avenue are zoned for Institutional-Private and Public Recreational Uses (IR) and School Zone (SC).
Block 2 is designated High Density Residential (Policy 3.2). Limited
ancillary commercial uses are also permitted. Accordingly, the site is
zoned for Apartment Residential (A) Zone and Neighbourhood
Commercial (NC), permitting 326 apartment units, 2,323 square metres
of commercial space, and also requiring the provision of 60 parking
spaces for the Scarborough Community Complex.
There are a number of agreements pertaining to this area that should be
taken into consideration when reviewing any new development proposal
on Block 8. These include an Agreement of Purchase and Sale between
Aspen Ridge Homes and the TCDSB, a Tri-Party Agreement between the
Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto Inc. (CCC), the City and
Aspen Ridge Homes, and a Memorandum of Understanding between the
City, the CCC and the TCDSB.
Comments:
In January 1995, Scarborough Council approved the rezoning of lands
along the east side of Progress Avenue for Institutional and School Uses
to permit a complex which would include recreational, cultural and
educational facilities. Since that time, the City has completed the
recreation centre, library and the park. The Chinese Cultural Centre of
Greater Toronto Inc. has constructed the first phase of their facility, with
a theatre to be added in the future. The City intends to incorporate the
Classical Chinese Gardens in the north-east section of the park. The
school block is the last remaining vacant part of the development
scheme for the lands east of Progress Avenue. Until receipt of the
current application, all material submitted to the City in relation to these
lands indicated an elementary school. In effect, past discussions
reflected in various documents, spoke of the benefits stemming from the
mutual use of the facilities, including a possible construction of a
double gymnasium, with the City's participation, for the school and
community use. To assist the developer with a speedy registration of
the plan, the City agreed in 1996 to the present configuration of Block 8
on the understanding that with Blocks 7 and 8 being in public
ownership, further adjustment to the common boundary may easily be
done to ensure adequate separation between the public buildings and
the residential housing to the east and to maintain visual connection
between both parts of the parkland.
In the supplementary material recently submitted, the applicant has
modified the proposed rezoning with respect to the building height
component and is now requesting permission for a building height of 20
metres, with the exception of rooftop mechanical equipment not
exceeding 26 metres in combination with the building. The present
policy allows the height exception only with respect to decorative roof
elements, and also provides for minimum setbacks from the property
lines for these elements.
The Official Plan policy applicable to the Aspen Ridge subdivision
provides for a net density of 150 apartment and townhouse units per
hectare (60 units per acre) to a maximum of 1600 units. It permits a
density transfer between the individual blocks within the designated
lands, provided that the owner of the lands that the density is
transferred from consents to such a transfer. The preliminary review of
the planning documents indicates that the permitted density cap of 1600
residential units has been already reached, and therefore, Council may
decide to direct the owner to submit the Official Plan Amendment
application to permit a residential density increase, and to reduce the
present distance and height limitations with respect to the building
elements exceeding 20 metres in height.
The solicitor representing the TCDSB indicated that the Board intends
to conclude the Agreement of Purchase and Sale. The Board is also in
agreement with the rezoning application, provided that the existing
zoning allowing schools and educational uses is maintained on the
property. Should the TCDSB decide not to complete the Agreement,
Council may wish to require clarification from the Board as to how the
children emanating from the subdivision are going to be accommodated
by the existing catholic schools in the area.
As outlined in the Background section of the report, Aspen Ridge
Homes is obliged to provide and operate 60 parking spaces on Block 2
for the benefit of the Scarborough Community Complex patrons. Based
on the development scheme proposed by the owner (Figure 2) and
approved by Council, parking for all uses will be accommodated within
the podium structure and underground. Should the TCDSB decline to
acquire Block 8, Aspen Ridge Homes would prefer to accommodate their
parking obligations on this block, and has expressed interest in
negotiating with the City the proposed parking relocation. In
anticipation of successful negotiations, the owner has requested a
zoning change with respect to Block 2 to substitute the requirement to
provide 60 parking spaces for the SCC with a possibility of providing 60
spaces, so the relevant zoning performance standard would read:
minimum 60 parking spaces may (not shall) be provided for uses on
Block 7.
In view of the site's proximity to the existing residential neighbourhood
to the east, the proposed rezoning request should be supported by the
submission of the site/landscape plans and building elevations
drawings to illustrate how a potential residential project, including 60
parking spaces for the SCC, could be developed on the site.
The owner's proposal to relocate 60 parking spaces has merit, since
parking on the east side of Progress Avenue in proximity to the facilities
will be more convenient for the SCC visitors. It would also permit Aspen
Ridge Homes to meet the contractual obligations at a considerably lower
cost, especially if parking is accommodated at grade. Should Council
direct the City staff to negotiate the changes proposed by Aspen Ridge
Homes, other agreements and arrangements should be reviewed and
renegotiated at the same time, to ensure that the city and community's
interests are protected.
Conclusions:
In all past presentations to the community, Council and staff, lands on
the east side of Progress Avenue were depicted as a location of
important public amenities, with the various partnership agreements
reflecting this understanding and expectations. Locating all parking on
the east side of Progress Avenue would be convenient for the visitors
to the Scarborough Community Complex which in the future would be
further enhanced by the planned addition of the Classical Chinese
Gardens and a theatre. On the other hand, providing 60 parking spaces
on the surface on Block 8 as opposed to an underground garage on
Block 2, would allow Aspen Ridge Homes to realise considerable
saving, and would remove significant constraint on future condominium
development that Aspen Ridge Homes has planned for Block 2.
Consequently, the proposal to provide 60 spaces on Block 8, should the
site not to be developed with a school, has considerable merit for both
parties, and should be pursued. For this reason, I am asking Council to
direct staff to negotiate the necessary changes to the current applicable
agreements and the zoning by-law's parking requirements for Block 2.
At the same time, staff should continue with the evaluation of the
proposed rezoning relative to Block 8. To assist staff with the review of
this proposal, the owner should be requested to submit a Site Plan
Control Application. Should the owner decide to proceed with
development based on the provision of self-contained residential units,
as opposed to bedrooms, an Official Plan amendment should also be
required.
Contact:
Anna Czajkowski, MCIP, RPP
Senior Planner
Scarborough Civic Centre
Telephone: (416) 396-7022
Fax: (416) 396-4265
E-mail: czajkows@city.scarborough.on.ca
_________
Mr. Lorne Ross, Lorne Ross Planning Services Inc., appeared before the Community Council
in connection with the foregoing matter.