July 23, 1998
To:Budget Committee
From:B.H. Gutteridge
Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services
Subject:Business Case Review of the "Works Best Practices Program"
Purpose:
To report on the review of the Business Case for the Works Best Practices Program
(WBPP), currently underway in the Water and Wastewater Services Division of Works and
Emergency Services, and to seek funding in the amount of $19,433,000 for continuation of
WBPP in 1998.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
At its meeting of April 29, 1998, Toronto Council approved the 1998-2002 Capital Works
Program, which includes provision for continuing expenditure on the Works Best Practices
Program (WBPP) in the Water and Wastewater Services Division of Works and Emergency
Services.
The Works Best Practices Program is a four and one-half year plan, with an estimated
capital cost of $101,905,000. The two major outcomes of this Program are the substantial
replacement of obsolete and aging plant instrumentation, equipment and control systems,
and the modernization of work and management practices and procedures, enabled by new
information systems, in all areas of operations and maintenance. The operating cost
reductions produced by WBPP implementation in Water and Wastewater Services will
increase through the implementation period to $37,076,000 per year in 2002, the first full
year following completion of the project and will continue at that level thereafter. WBPP is
presently on schedule with regard to the overall planned capital expenditure and the
achievement of operating cost reductions.
In approving the 1998-2002 Capital Works Program, Council withheld funding approval of
expenditures pending a review of the WBPP business case by the Chief Administrator's
Office. Of the planned total WBPP cost of $101,905,000, prior financing has been approved
totalling $25,377,000 to complete Phase 1 activities.
Of the amount approved, the total spent and/or committed to date is $22,840,000 leaving an
uncommitted balance of $2,537,000, which is, however, earmarked for remaining Phase 1
planned activities.
Additional financing in the amount of $19,433,000 is now required for continuation of
planned implementation work in 1998, with some expenditures extending into 1999 as
major contracted plant detailed design work, under Phase 2 of the Program. Details to the
Costing Unit level are shown in Appendix 1.
The Treasurer has advised that funding can be made available from the Water Pollution
Control Measures Reserve Fund and the Water Supply Capital Financing Reserve.
The financial impact of implementing WBPP in the former Metro Water Supply and Water
Pollution Control functions was analyzed by the Finance Department in 1997. The results of
that analysis indicated that the WBPP can be financed through the water rate without
adverse impact to the existing rate projections. The consequences of not completing WBPP
are significantly higher future water rates as a result of foregoing planned operating cost
reductions estimated at $37,076,000 per year.
It should be noted that this program will contribute significantly to resolution of the Year
2000 (Y2K) problem in Water and Wastewater Services. The estimated twelve-to-fifteen
million dollar cost of replacing aging, non-Y2K compliant SCADA (Supervisory Control
and Data Acquisition) equipment and systems in the water and wastewater treatment plants
and in the collection and transmission systems is already contained in the WBPP capital
estimates. Further, all new information systems and technologies deployed under WBPP
will be certified Y2K compliant as per corporate standards, avoiding the need to repair or
replace a host of older, non-compliant systems.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1)Toronto Council endorse continuance of the Works Best Practices Program, described
herein;
(2)funding in the amount of $19,433,000 ($3,063,000 in Water Supply Appropriation
WS026 and $16,370,000 in Water Pollution Control Appropriation WPC001) be approved
from the Water Supply Capital Financing Reserve and the Water Pollution Control
Measures Reserve Fund;
(3)subject to recommendation No. (2) above authority be granted for an expenditure of
$19,433,000, after the Municipal Goods and Services Tax Rebate, to continue
implementation of the Best Practices Program; and
(4)the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect
thereto.
Council Reference/ Background/ History:
At its meeting of July 2 and 3, 1997, by adoption of Clause No. 3 of Report No. 13 of
Financial Priorities, Metropolitan Council endorsed continuance of the WBPP. The program
had been previously established by Metropolitan Council on September 25 and 26, 1996
through adoption of Clause No. 2 of Report No. 14 of the Environmental and Public Space
Committee with the objective of implementing the best practices in the utility industry in the
areas of work management, technology and organization, to maximize operating
effectiveness and efficiency across the Department. The WBPP arose through expanding the
structure and scope of the previously existing Process Equipment Replacement and Strategic
Information Systems Plan (SISP) project for the former Metro Works Water Pollution
Control Division (reference Clause No. 1 of Report No. 15 of Environment and Public
Space Committee, adopted by Metropolitan Council at its meeting of September 27 and 28,
1995) to encompass all business functions of the former Metro Works Department.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
At its meeting of September 25 and 26, 1996, Metropolitan Council, by approval of Clause
No. 2 of Report No. 14 of the Environment and Public Space Committee, endorsed
commencement of the Works Best Practices Program in the Works Department. At its
meeting of July 2-3, 1997, Council, by approval without amendment of Clause No. 3 of
Report No. 13 of the Financial Priorities Committee, authorized expenditures to perform
Phase 1 implementation of the Works Best Practices Program (WBPP). In each of these
instances, a presentation of the business case for WBPP, in the context of the
recommendations being requested at the time, was presented to the Committee. Further, the
business case had been reviewed and endorsed by the Metro Chief Administrative Officer,
Commissioner of Finance, and Commissioner of Corporate Services.
On May 26, 1998, the Chief Administrative Officer met with staff of the Water and
Wastewater Division of Works and Emergency Services, including the Project Manager for
WBPP, to review key elements of the Works Best Practices Program business case. In the
light of previous business case reviews having been performed by senior Metro officials,
and because this Program is both broad in scope and diverse in nature, involving substantial
equipment upgrades in seven major water/wastewater operating facilities, the
commissioning of a number of strategic information management systems, and the redesign
of operations/maintenance work and management practices, the review focused on three key
perspectives.
The first perspective is the financial component of the Program, including costs over time,
operating cost savings over time, and the implication of the program on water and sewer
user rates - related to this would be the impacts on overall service delivery in terms of
quality and effectiveness.
The second perspective is the implication on organization and staff, both bargaining unit and
management, and the relationship between WBPP and the City of Toronto Amalgamation
processes.
The third perspective is the implementation methodology being used to govern the wide
range of tasks and activities involved in implementing the Program.
Financial Aspects.
The fundamental objective of the Works Best Practices Program is to ensure business
operations continue to be performed to degrees of efficiency and effectiveness that are
consistent with modern practices and supporting technologies. One of the first steps in the
initiation of the Program was the establishment of a "competitiveness assessment". This
exercise utilizes an efficiency benchmarking technique which is essentially identical to those
used by the multinational private operators in developing operating contract proposals for
major water and wastewater utilities. It is the results of this exercise, backed up by similar
conclusions produced in a totally independent, internal "simulated competition", that led to
the establishment of a thirty-seven million dollar per year operating cost reduction target for
the Works Best Practices Program.
The total cost of the Program, to be implemented over a four and one-half year period, is
stated to be $101,905,000. Of the total cost figure, approximately $65,000,000 represents
previously planned expenditures for the necessary ongoing replacement and upgrading of
existing equipment and control systems in water and wastewater plants and in the collection
and transmission systems (these facilities have a combined infrastructure value estimated at
$7,500,000,000). It is in fact the remaining investment component of approximately
$37,000,000, aimed at new and improved operations and maintenance work practice and
organizational redesign, underlying technology development and process control
improvements, that generates the bulk of the $37,076,000 in annual operating cost
reductions. The $65,000,000 has been effectively "bundled" into the Best Practices budget
in order to leverage opportunities for efficiencies through operational improvements and to
ensure those investments are coordinated within the broad standards and technology
development strategies of the core Best Practices initiative.
In 1997, the full WBPP costs and schedule of planned operating cost reductions were
included by Metro Finance in Water Rate Model calculations and it was determined that no
rate increase would be required. The Program, even including the bundled $65,000,000
component, is effectively self-funding in that the accumulated operating cost reductions
generated exceed the capital costs within the life of the Program implementation. As the
table below shows by the year 2002, the program breaks even and is producing savings of
$37,076,000 per year. If the Program does not proceed to completion, there will be an
increasing effect on water rates.
The table below summarizes the business case figures. Capital costs are year-by-year,
inflated to year of expenditure and after the Municipal Goods and Services Tax Rebate.
Operating savings are net, year-by-year, in constant 1997 dollars. FTE reductions are
approximate, year-by-year. The Program is presently on target to deliver the planned
operating cost reductions within the planned Program cost.
|
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
Totals |
1998 Capital
Works Program |
6,273 |
12,845 |
15,230 |
28,952 |
23,921 |
14,684 |
0 |
101,905 |
Net Operating
Savings |
0 |
2,898 |
3,183 |
9,892 |
19,880 |
30,066 |
37,076 |
102,995 |
FTE Reductions
(est) |
0 |
38 |
38 |
110 |
157 |
120 |
80 |
543 |
The effects of implementing Works Best Practices on service delivery and product quality
are favourable. Present quality levels for potable water production and wastewater effluent
production will be maintained, with improved flexibility and cost management relating to
legislated or otherwise directed improvement strategies. Service levels will be maintained,
providing for better responsiveness and better access to more relevant and timely
information. Other benefits include improved asset management and long-range
performance, increased facility/infrastructure lifetime, and opportunities for improved
receiving water quality.
As a result of delay in proceeding with implementation of certain works, the projected cash
flow for the project has been revised from the 1998 Capital Works Program submission as
noted below.
|
Pre-1998 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
Total |
per 1998
Capital Works
Program |
19,118 |
15,230 |
28,952 |
23,921 |
14,684 |
0 |
101,905 |
Revised |
14,811 |
17,339 |
31,150 |
23,921 |
14,684 |
0 |
101,905 |
Appropriate amendments will be reflected in the 1999 Capital Works Program.
Staffing and Organization.
The findings of the competitiveness assessment, confirmed in the simulated competition,
pointed to reductions in operations and maintenance labour costs as the primary source of
available cost savings. The "best practices" that have been identified under this Program as
most relevant to former Metro water and wastewater operations stress the following as the
most significant areas of opportunity:
-more efficiently planned, managed and executed work practices;
-"total productive operations" (TPO), which focuses on maximizing the productive time of
human resources; and,
-workforce flexibility, which tackles the issue of separated skills and crafts and its
associated inefficiencies.
WBPP therefore emphasizes a broad transition of the workforce, including management, in
terms of the jobs people do, the way people are organized, and the work practices they
employ. This transition must be orchestrated in conjunction with the replacement and
upgrading of process control equipment and systems and the implementation of key
computer systems aimed at organizing and managing resources, automating tasks, and
managing the performance of the business, its resources and assets.
Activities under WBPP to-date have identified and confirmed a clear need to reduce on a
phased basis the size of the overall workforce needed to perform the work and business
processes that characterize the present workload. This was evidenced by the competitiveness
assessment, and by work done under the Program to-date, particularly in business
re-engineering exercises. This should not be surprising, given the rapid pace of change in the
industry over the past decade at the global level and the lesser degree of organizational
change that has taken place in North America. At the same time, change of this magnitude,
regardless of the underlying business and financial logic, cannot be instituted without
consideration for its impact on staff at all levels. Included under Works Best Practices are a
range of work redesign components, affecting the jobs, responsibilities and skills of
front-line staff in operations, maintenance, and general labour areas, as well as the change
management skills at the supervisory level. Within that process, some job descriptions need
to be revised, and new ones created. WBPP incorporates costs to support staff transition.
This includes funds to finance voluntary exit packages and staff training, including training
for staff needing new skills to perform new types of work and training for staff who wish to
leave, but who require certain skills to assist them in finding new jobs. Both these funding
mechanisms are financed out of accruing savings during the implementation period, and
have already been netted out of the planned cost reductions.
Senior staff in the areas of Finance, Human Resources and Corporate Services are to be
involved in this process to assist in policy areas and to ensure that developed policies are
followed. In the area of Labour Relations specifically, senior staff have been involved in this
Program from the outset, and continue to play an active role in the process.
At this stage, C.U.P.E. Local 79 continues to support the Works Best Practices Program, and
has for the past year maintained an active role in the Program. Local 416 formally "stepped
back" from active WBPP participation earlier this year. At this point, formal discussions are
under way at the senior level to develop an appropriate working relationship aimed
primarily at addressing areas of concern relating to the impact of WBPP on its members. It
is a stated goal of the Works Best Practices Program to achieve planned reductions in the
workforce through attrition, voluntary exit packages, and an active process of redeployment
on a City-wide basis, with layoffs to be considered only on a last-resort basis. Intensive
discussions are planned to take place in August for purposes of arriving at a firm set of
principles and protocols to govern the implementation of WBPP.
With regard to the relative implications of WBPP and amalgamation, it is clear that this
Program is actively performing Phase 3 restructuring work, and will help provide a solid
operational foundation for the emerging Works and Emergency Services management
structure. Appropriate linkages between the two activities are presently under development.
Implementation Methodology.
The third area of focus is the implementation methodology of the Program - the standards
and procedures and methods being applied to enable and achieve the planned results. This is
a complex area, and it is evident that much expertise has been applied to the WBPP
methodology. The initial design phase utilized external consultants from a wide range of
disciplines. This was needed for a number of reasons: the volume of work to be done; the
transitional nature of much of that work; the need to apply techniques that are very current
and very specific to water and wastewater operations and management; the need for
assistance in project management activities relating to several major disciplines including
engineering and process control technologies and practices, information systems design and
development, and "total productive operations" work practices redesign; and, importantly,
the need to apply specially-skilled resources to the Program on a full-time basis through the
critical design stages. As the Program moves into its second phase of work this year, new
roles are planned for development in Works and Emergency Services to effect the transition
of sustaining aspects of the new operation into the hands of staff. The need for consulting
support will reduce substantially as key implementations are rolled out in operational work
areas, in major process control systems and their networks of equipment and devices, and in
underlying information technology applications.
From a project management standpoint, the methodology being applied is well suited to the
Program. There is a strong Quality Control and Quality Assurance component, which is
separated from the main project body to ensure objectivity. There is a review and approval
process for project deliverables which brings to bear the expertise of both consultants and
staff and also provides effective knowledge transfer to staff to maximize self-sufficiency in
the future.
A benefits tracking program is under development, with the assistance of Finance staff, to
capture and report direct WBPP benefits in the areas of energy, chemicals, parts and
materials, and savings in labor costs. This system will operate until completion of the
Program, and can be adapted to support continuous improvement initiatives on an ongoing
basis.
The Performance Management component of WBPP is a computerized business tool which
will be used for monitoring business performance, for establishing improvement targets and
for tracking the achievement of those targets. This capability is in keeping with emerging
corporate strategies for benchmarking and tracking of key business improvements.
Conclusion:
The Works Best Practices Program is an important strategic initiative. It emphasizes the
establishment of a continuous improvement business and work environment in a climate of
fiscal restraint, public accountability and openness, and global competition. The business
case for WBPP is strong - the achievement of ongoing cost reductions in the range of
$37,076,000 per year for an investment of $101,950,000, a large part of which is an
operational necessity to maintain the operational viability of approximately $7,500,000,000
in infrastructure. The resulting payback ratio of 35 percent represents a solid cost-benefit.
WBPP effectively pays for itself within the lifetime of the project.
While the Program will have a significant impact on both management and bargaining unit
staff, funding has been built in for transition and training. Communications and staff
involvement are firmly entrenched principles of the Program. Corporate labour
relations/human resources staff have been involved in our ongoing discussion with the
Union and are providing input with respect to transition and training initiatives. The project
methodology is well-suited to the needs of this large and complex undertaking. Performance
management and benefits tracking are integral to the design of technologies, practices and
organization.
This review process concluded that the Works Best Practices Program Business Case is
complete and appropriate. The Commissioner of Finance and the Executive Director of
Information Technology for the City of Toronto have reviewed the Program and are in
concurrence. It is recommended that funding for the Program be provided as set out in
Appendix 1 to this report.
Contact Names and Telephone Numbers:
William G. Crowther
Director, Management and Technical Services
Toronto Works and Emergency Services Department
Phone: (416) 392-8256
Fax: (416) 392-2974
E-Mail: william_g._crowther@metrodesk.metrotor.on.ca
Jim Coe
Manager, Works Best Practices Program
Toronto Works and Emergency Services Department
Phone: (416) 392-3141
Fax: (416) 392-8817
E-Mail: jim_coe@metrodesk.metrotor.on.ca
Barry Gutteridge
Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services
Michael Garrett
Chief Administrative Officer
Wanda Liczyk
Commissioner of Finance
jdc/ea:council\cbudget\bpp98723 / File No. 67-008-001
Business Case Review of the "Works Best Practices Program"
APPENDIX 1: Capital Accounts
(in $000's, including GST after Rebate)
CWP001 - Works Best Practices Program, Water Pollution Control |
Total
Funding
Requirement |
Year of
Expenditure* |
|
1998 |
1999 |
Management, Planning and Design: |
|
|
S20508 |
Project Management |
218 |
218 |
|
S20509 |
Office/Track Support |
646 |
646 |
|
Operating Business Programs and Systems: |
|
|
S20002 |
Work Management System |
258 |
258 |
|
S20465 |
Practices Implementation |
130 |
130 |
|
S20466 |
Laboratory Information Management
System |
171 |
171 |
|
S20510 |
Performance & Operations
Management System |
201 |
201 |
|
S20511 |
Financial/Administrative Systems
Integration |
15 |
15 |
|
S20512 |
Workflow & Document Management
System |
47 |
47 |
|
S20477 |
Technology Infrastructure |
325 |
325 |
|
S20483 |
Industrial Waste Management System |
73 |
73 |
|
Process Control Systems Upgrade and Improvement |
|
|
S20467 |
Highland Creek Treatment Plant -
Detailed Design |
3,717 |
558 |
3,159 |
S20468 |
Main Treatment Plant - Detailed
Design |
7,338 |
1,101 |
6,237 |
S20470 |
Humber Treatment Plant - Detailed
Design |
3,231 |
485 |
2,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total CWP001
|
16,370 |
4,228 |
12,142 |
CWS026 - Works Best Practices Program, Water Supply |
|
|
Management, Planning and Design: |
|
|
T20313 |
Project Management |
432 |
432 |
|
T20314 |
Office/Track Support |
246 |
246 |
|
T20315 |
Information Technology Architecture |
250 |
250
|
|
Operating Business Programs and Systems: |
|
|
T20317 |
Work Management System |
392 |
392 |
|
T20318 |
Practices Implementation |
150 |
150 |
|
T20319 |
Laboratory Information Management
System |
182 |
182 |
|
T20320 |
Performance & Operations
Management System |
200 |
200 |
|
T20321 |
Financial/Administrative Systems
Integration |
74 |
74 |
|
T20322 |
Workflow & Document Management
System |
100 |
100 |
|
Process Control Systems Upgrade and Improvement |
|
|
T20340 |
Distribution Optimization |
1,037 |
519 |
518 |
|
|
|
|
Total CWS026 |
3,063 |
2,545 |
518 |
Program Total |
19433 |
6773 |
12660 |
* The cash flow indicated in this table reflects that required for for new work to be initiated
in 1998 and for which funding is now required. The cash flow for certain elements extends
into 1999 because the contracts to be awarded in 1998 will not be completed in 1998.