April 22, 1998
METROPOLITAN CYCLING AND PEDESTRIAN COMMITTEE:
City Council, at its meeting held on April 16, 998, had before it Clause No. 11 contained in Report No. 4 of The Urban
Environment and Development Committee, headed AFoot and Bicycle Couriers - Revenue Canada Taxation@.
Council, during consideration of the aforementioned matter, decided not to adopt the Clause.
City Clerk
R. Walton/csb
Encl.
Clause sent to:Metropolitan Cycling and Pedestrian Committee
Mr. A. W. Scott, Charter Member, Toronto Hoof and Cycle Courier Coalition
CITY CLERK
Clause embodied in Report No. 4 of the Urban Environment and Development Committee, which was
before the Council of the City of Toronto at its meeting held on April 16, 1998.
11
Foot and Bicycle Couriers--Revenue Canada Taxation.
(City Council on April 16, 1998, did not adopt this Clause)
The Urban Environment and Development Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation of the
Metropolitan Cycling and Pedestrian Committee, embodied in the following Committee Transmittal (February 24,
1998) from the City Clerk:
Recommendation:
The Metropolitan Cycling and Pedestrian Committee on February 23, 1998, recommended to the Urban Environment and
Development Committee, and Council, the endorsement of the concept outlined in Mr. A.W. Scott's communication, dated
January 21, 1998, that foot and bicycle couriers should be permitted to apply for business expense deductions for tax
purposes for the extra nutrition over and above the norm required as a condition of their employment because this
nutritional increment is the equivalent of fuel used by transport vehicles; and, further, that the Toronto Hoof and Cycle
Courier Coalition be invited to make a deputation to the Urban Environment and Development Committee at the
appropriate time.
The Metropolitan Cycling and Pedestrian Committee reports, for the information of the Urban Environment and
Development Committee and Council, having requested the Toronto Hoof and Cycle Courier Coalition to submit more
detailed information.
Background:
The Metropolitan Cycling and Pedestrian Committee had before it a communication dated January 21, 1998, from Mr. A.
W. Scott, Charter Member, Toronto Hoof and Cycle Courier Coalition, advising that a federal hearing will take place in
either late winter or the early spring respecting his request that Revenue Canada allow foot and bicycle couriers to claim as
business expenses, the cost of monies spent fuelling their deliveries; and requesting the Committee to provide him with a
letter of support concerning this matter.
Mr. A. W. Scott, Charter Member, Toronto Hoof and Cycle Courier Coalition, appeared before the Metropolitan Cycling
and Pedestrian Committee in connection with the foregoing matter.
(Communication dated January 21, 1998, addressed to
the Chair, Metropolitan Cycling and Pedestrian Committee,
from Mr. Alan Wayne Scott, Charter Member,
Toronto Hoof and Cycle Courier Coalition.)
While I realize you must be swamped with loftier matters, it is our hope that you can find the time to consider the plight of
my co-workers and myself. If, in so doing, you find any merit in our position, it is further hoped that you could provide us
with a letter outlining your views on the matter.
Our argument is a simple one: enviro-friendly couriers should not be taxed by Revenue Canada on monies spent fuelling
their deliveries. That we are currently required to pay this levy on funds that logic recognizes as allowable business
expenses, only creates an uneven playing field in our industry and rewards the comparatively irresponsible, motorized
members of our fraternity.
Here, despite years of lip service to the contrary, the Canadian Government tacitly encourages the unnecessary pollution of
our cities.
Foot and bicycle couriers keep this City moving and have done so for years. They are traditionally maligned, overworked
and underpaid, often by the very people who rely on them for so much. Arguably the hardest-working, least-privileged
segment of our urban work force, is it any wonder so many of these responsible young Canadians prefer to remain isolated
from mainstream society. Here, I feel we all lose.
I have asked for a federal hearing concerning this matter and have been informed that it should take place in either late
winter or the early spring.
We look forward to hearing your views on the subject.
(Communication dated July 24, 1997, addressed to the
Tax Court of Canada from Metropolitan Councillor Jack Layton, Don River,
which was attached to the foregoing communication from Mr. Scott.)
Mr. Scott has been a courier for the past 15 years in downtown Toronto, which includes my Ward of Don River. Couriers,
like Mr. Scott, are an important part of our community. They perform a necessary service that would otherwise have to be
carried out by cars which would highly increase downtown congestion, noise pollution and emissions levels.
In order to properly perform his job as a foot courier, Mr. Scott must consume quantities of food and drink over and above
that of the average person, or even himself if he were in another line of work. Maintaining this diet is an absolute
requirement of his job and, thus, is a necessary and extra expense that he would otherwise not have.
I fully support his request to have this expense considered as a deductible business expense for tax purposes.
(Communication dated July 22, 1997, from
Metropolitan Councillor Joe Pantalone, Trinity-Niagara,
which was attached to the foregoing communication from Mr. Scott.)
To Whom It May Concern:
As a Metropolitan Toronto Councillor for several years, I am pleased to provide the following statement recognizing the
value of the work undertaken by bike and walking couriers:
"Bike couriers and walkers provide a vital service in an environmentally-friendly manner. They deliver packages
throughout our city without contributing to our serious smog problem. They reduce the number of vehicles on our
over-charged downtown streets while providing a competitive service. If every industry produced so little harm to our
environment and contributed so little to our traffic problems, our city would be an even better place in which to live and
work."
(Communication dated July 16, 1997, addressed to the
Tax Court of Canada from City Councillor Mario Silva, Ward 3,
which was attached to the foregoing communication from Mr. Scott.)
I am writing in support of Mr. Scott's appeal application to review income tax laws in regard to the propriety of setting
expenses needed to generate income to be set against that income for tax purposes.
It is my opinion, shared with many of my political colleagues, that the service provided by cycle and pedestrian couriers is
instrumental in moving the economy of the City of Toronto forward, without contributing to increased air pollution, traffic
gridlock and ensuring a better quality of life for its citizens.
To this end, all levels of government endorse and encourage greater recreational and business use of bicycles to address
these problems through policies such as dedicated bicycle lanes and other initiatives. In the course of their business,
couriers spend most of an average ten-hour workday, five days a week on the road, and must, therefore, incur additional
expenses for food and beverages. These expenditures would also be greater than that for individuals who work in other
industries or businesses due to the nature that this work entails.
It would only be fair and appropriate to permit couriers some allowance for this expense against their income, as is already
permitted in other sectors. This would be in keeping with the efforts of all levels of government to further encourage the
use of non-polluting ways of moving the economy of this city forward.
Your consideration of my letter is much appreciated. If I may be of any further assistance in this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Distance Calculations
Courier Career Statistics
Alan Wayne Scott
The following calculations represent the total distance of deliveries accomplished on foot, bicycle and public transit by Mr.
Scott in the course of his 15-year career.
Metropass/Runner - November 1990 to April 1997:
These totals were arrived at by measuring each delivery on a map, point to point, with a kite string. The total length of the
string was then applied to the map=s scale to approximate the total distance that Mr. Scott=s efforts covered, had each
delivery been laid out end to end. An average delivery length was calculated and multiplied by the total number of
documented deliveries available. An approximation of undocumented distances was then conservatively arrived at.
Length of average delivery3.65 miles
Total number of deliveries from December 1993 to April 199712,535
Total length of deliveries
from December 1993 to April 19973.65 x 12,535 = 45,752.75 miles
Average total length of deliveries per month
from December 1993 to April 19971,115
Approximation of total length of deliveries
from November 1990 to November 19931,115 x 37 = 41,255 miles
November 1988 to November 1990
--recovering from bicycle accident
January 1987 to October 1988
--dispatcher for United Messenger Limited
Biker--Approximation of total length of deliveries
from September 1982 to December 1986
(biker capability estimated at
2/3 that of Metropass/runner)743 x 52 = 38,636 miles
Total:From September 1982 to April 1997125,642.75 miles
or
More than five times the equatorial circumference of the earth.
Courier Fuel
Daily Food and Liquid Intake
Menu No. 1
Menu No. 2
Menu No. 3
Caloric Reference Source: Guide To The Foods You Eat - copyright 1994 Black Dog and Leventhal Publishers Inc.
The following persons appeared before the Urban Environment and Development Committee in connection with the
foregoing matter:
-Mr. Alan Wayne Scott, Toronto; and
-Councillor Jack Layton, Don River.
(A copy of the newspaper articles dated August 12, 1997, from the Toronto Sun and August 23, 1997, from the Toronto
Star, which were appended to the foregoing communication dated January 21, 1998, from Mr. Scott, have been forwarded
to all Members of Council with the agenda of the March 23 and 24, 1998, meeting of the Urban Environment and
Development Committee, and a copy thereof is also on file in the office of the City Clerk.)