City of Toronto  
HomeContact UsHow Do I...?Advanced search
Living in TorontoDoing businessVisiting TorontoAccessing City Hall
 
Accessing City Hall
Mayor
Councillors
Meeting Schedules
   
   
  City of Toronto Council and Committees
  All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.
   

 

September 16, 1998

  To:Etobicoke Community Council

 From:D. Gulli, Director, Transportation and Engineering Planning

 Subject:Noise Barriers - Mystic Pointe Development

(Lakeshore-Queensway)

 Purpose:

 To respond to a request from Councillor Kinahan regarding the requirements for noise barriers in the vicinity of the Mystic Pointe development.

 Financial Implications:

 There are no financial implications for the City related to this report.

 Recommendation:

 It is recommended that:



  1. this report be received.

 Background:

 The Mystic Pointe development is located on the south side and adjacent to the Gardiner Expressway (formerly the Queen Elizabeth Way) and between Grand Avenue and the Mimico Creek. The accompanying sketch (Attachment No. 1) shows both the location of the development and the type and location of "noise walls" in the vicinity. The jurisdiction over this portion of the highway was transferred from the Ministry of Transportation to Metropolitan Toronto (now the City of Toronto) on March 31, 1997, as part of the Provincial downloading exercise.

 The existing wall construction along this portion of the expressway is as follows:

1988:Ministry of Transportation (MTO) as part of their retrofit program, constructed 4 m high metal walls (noise reflective type) on the north and south sides of the expressway from Royal York Road easterly. On the north side the wall terminated just east of Wesley Street and on the south side the wall terminated east of Milton Street. Generally, these walls were intended to protect existing low density development from noise impacts from the highway.

 1992:At the request of and at the expense of the adjacent land owner (Zanini Developments), the MTO fence was extended on the south side of the highway as far as Grand Avenue. A newer type of fence construction (Durisol wall) consisting of horizontal noise absorptive panels, was constructed. It is our understanding that the requirement for a noise wall was not imposed by MOEE requirements, but by the developers decision to assist in marketing their development.

 1996:Similar to the 1992 extension, Zanini Developments requested the MTO to extend the wall on the north side of the highway to screen their new development on Mendota Road. A 4 m high Durisol wall was constructed at the developer's expense.

 1997:On the east side of Grand Avenue on the south side of the Park Lawn exit ramp, Camrost constructed (on their own property), and at their expense, a 2 m high wooden screen fence along the north perimeter of their Mystic Pointe site as shown on the attachment.

 Discussion:

 New residential development sites that are located adjacent to highways are subject to Provincial policies with respect to freeway noise as set out in "Guidelines on Noise and Residential Development Adjacent to Freeways". The provincial guidelines establish permitted decibel levels for indoor and outdoor living areas and also discuss mitigative measures which may be undertaken to reduce noise levels for residents as well as suitable warning clauses for the benefit of purchasers.

 Camrost has retained several noise consultants over the years to evaluate and report on the noise impacts of the highway on their Mystic Pointe development. During the 1990 rezoning process, J. E. Coulter Associates Engineering prepared a noise report. Their report was reviewed by the Ministry of Environment who provided comments to the Ontario Municipal Board indicating that "the latest noise report prepared for Phase 1 and 2 has adequately addressed our concerns with respect to noise impacts". The Coulter report recommended:

 a)air conditioning for all units

b)windows facing north be upgraded

c)a warning clause be placed in offers of sale

d)two outdoor amenity areas be reviewed for possible mitigative measures after landscaping plans were available.

Prior to any building construction occurring, the developer changed their building proposal. The Urban Development Department requested an updated noise impact study incorporating the new building configuration. A report from Jade Acoustics dated October 12, 1995 was submitted. That report indicated that to meet the MOEE guidelines for the outdoor living areas behind the townhouses, that no noise wall would be required once the apartment buildings were constructed. In the interim (until all of the apartment buildings were completed) a 2 m noise wall would mitigate the noise impacts on the townhouses.

 The appropriate warning clause with respect to highway noise is included in the development agreement and is also contained within the offer to purchase. The upgrading of the north facing windows and the requirement for air conditioning in each unit is being addressed by the Building Division of the Urban Development Department.

 Conclusion:

 All of the recent developments in the vicinity of the Gardiner Expressway and Grand Avenue meet or surpass the relevant guidelines with respect to noise.

 Contact Name:

 Cecil Lindsay, Manager - Development Engineering - Transportation and Engineering Planning.

(416)394-8383; Fax: (416)394-8942.

     D. Gulli

Director, Transportation and Engineering Planning

 CL/mz

Attachments

 ccC-31-92 "B"

 

   
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.

 

City maps | Get involved | Toronto links
© City of Toronto 1998-2001