City of Toronto  
HomeContact UsHow Do I...?Advanced search
Living in TorontoDoing businessVisiting TorontoAccessing City Hall
 
Accessing City Hall
Mayor
Councillors
Meeting Schedules
   
   
  City of Toronto Council and Committees
  All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.
   

 

January 26, 1998

 

To: North York Community Council

 

From: George M. Dixon,

City Solicitor, North York

 

Subject: Fence - Swimming Pool Enclosure - 32 Windhill Crescent - in the Community of North York, Ward 6

 

Purpose:

 

To report on an application to permit the existing swimming pool enclosure to remain as constructed on the property municipally known as 32 Windhill Crescent notwithstanding that the said enclosure (fence) has been constructed contrary to North York Fence By-law 30901, as amended.

 

Financial Implications:

 

There are no financial implications for the City.

 

Recommendations:

 

It is recommended that the request to maintain the existing pool enclosure as constructed be refused due to a number of deficiencies that render the enclosure unsafe.

 

Background:

 

The former City of North York enacted Fence By-law 30901 on July 8, 1992 being a by-law for requiring the owners of privately owned outdoor swimming pools to erect and maintain fences and gates around such swimming pools.

 

Discussion:

 

The subject property is located on the north side of Windhill Crescent and contains one half of a semi-detached dwelling. An above ground swimming pool was erected in the rear yard approximately 7 years ago without the benefit of a building permit. An inspection of the pool enclosure revealed the following deficiencies:

 

1) the pool is located closer than 1.0m (3.3 feet) to a climbable condition

 

2) the gate to the pool area is not self-closing and self-latching

 

 

3) the gate is not being locked when the pool area is not in use

 

 

4) the window in the garage which forms part of the pool enclosure is not secure

 

 

5) clearance between the bottom of the fence and grade exceeds 50mm (2 inches)

 

 

6) the wire mesh on the fence is greater than 38mm (1 2 inches)

 

 

7) the pool structure is within less than 1.2m (4 feet) of the pool fence.

 

 

The area By-law Investigator has on occasion, talked to the son of the owners and requested that the parents contact us. To date the owners have not contacted North York other than to send a letter seeking relief from the provisions of the fence by-law. Consequently, a >Notice of Violation= dated September 17, 1997 setting out the deficiencies, was issued to the property owners. To date none of the deficiencies have been corrected. We are now in the process of laying charges for failure to comply with the fence by-law.

 

Conclusions:

 

In view of the fact that the deficiencies identified pose a safety hazard, it is recommended that the request to maintain the existing pool and enclosure as constructed be refused.

 

Contact Name:

 

David Roberts, Director of By-law Enforcement Services,

North York Civic Centre

395-7020, Fax 395-7056

E-mail: Dave@City.North-York.on.ca

 

 

George M. Dixon

City Solicitor

 

   
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.

 

City maps | Get involved | Toronto links
© City of Toronto 1998-2001