City of Toronto  
HomeContact UsHow Do I...?Advanced search
Living in TorontoDoing businessVisiting TorontoAccessing City Hall
 
Accessing City Hall
Mayor
Councillors
Meeting Schedules
   
   
  City of Toronto Council and Committees
  All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.
   

 

H.W. Osmond Doyle, LL.B., LL.M.

City Solicitor

Legal Services

100 Queen Street West

14th Floor, West Tower, City Hall

Toronto ON M5H 2N2

Tel: (416) 392-8047

Fax: (416) 392-0024

November 25, 1998

To:Toronto Community Council

From:H.W.O. Doyle

Subject:2223 Bloor Street West - Runnymede Theatre (Ward 19)

Purpose:This report is for information purposes only.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

There are no financial implications.

Recommendations:

Council Reference/Background/History:

Toronto City Council, at its meeting on October 1 and 2, 1998, amended and adopted the September 16, 1998 report by the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development regarding the subject premises. In so doing Council instructed the City Solicitor to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board ("the Board") and to retain an outside planner, if necessary, in opposition to a proposal to permit the conversion of the Runnymede Theatre into a Chapters Bookstore.

The applicant required variances as (1) the theatre is "split" zoned under the zoning by-law such that the proposed retail use is not currently permitted in the rear portion of the building and, (2) the by-law limits the amount of non-residential gross floor area that can be used for retail use to 1,800 square metres whereas the applicant was seeking 2,178 square metres of retail use. Those variances had been approved by the Committee of Adjustment and that decision was appealed by a number of area residents.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

At the hearing before the Board, the City and area residents presented their concerns regarding the lack of a proper planning process over this particular proposal, the proposed use, historical preservation, traffic and parking.

In its Order issued on November 5, 1998, the Board held that the proposal met all four tests under the Planning Act for the approval of minor variances. The application was approved subject to the condition that the use be limited to the retail sale of books, magazines, and similar and related goods as well as an ancillary café.

In his decision, the Board Member, Mr. Yao, held that allowing the residents' appeal would have the effect of "ensuring the destruction of the theatre", whereas the variances requested would "permit the retention of the building and internal ornamentation". Mr. Yao did however express concern over the divisiveness caused by the proposal, and set out his hope that there would be productive interchanges between the parties with respect to the site plan and heritage approval negotiations.

Further to this concern, the Board Member made the following suggestions:

1.It would have been helpful for either of the parties to have been able to call upon a mediation service prior to the Board hearing in order to facilitate the exchange of information.

2.The City might take note of the citizen concerns raised during the hearing, particularly in respect of the impact of "big box" stores on established retail strips.

3.The parties should be encouraged to establish an atmosphere of mutual respect. In particular, the application proponents could have provided plans to the area residents and local Councillors before the hearing.

Concerning the issues of traffic and parking, the Board held that there was no point in tying the variances to a traffic study. The applicant, through his counsel, had provided the Board with an Undertaking that he would produce a parking study for this area for the City for information purposes.

Conclusions:

The Board approved the subject application emphasizing that this approval would result in the retention of the building's historical structure and internal ornamentation. The Board also expressed its view that a better mediation and communication process should have been established, prior to the hearing, and that the City may wish to address the issue of "big box" retail in established commercial strips.

The City and the applicant are now in the process of negotiating the site plan and historical approvals. In this regard I understand that a report from Heritage Toronto is also before Toronto community Council with respect to the application.

Contact Name:Marc Kemerer

Telephone:(416) 392-1228

Fax:(416) 392-0024

E-mail:mkemerer@city.toronto.on.ca

H.W.O. Doyle

City Solicitor

Legal Services

MK:ih

p:\1998\ug\cps\leg\TO980053.leg

O:\WRITE\MKEMERER\2223BLOR\TO980053.RPT

 

   
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.

 

City maps | Get involved | Toronto links
© City of Toronto 1998-2001