June 10, 1998
To: Urban Environment and Development Committee
From: H.W.O. Doyle
City Solicitor
Subject: The feasibility of special legislation to provide
that the former City of Toronto's 1984 special legislation
respecting demolition control applies to the whole of the urban
area of the new City.
Purpose:
To advise the Urban Environment and Development Committee on
the feasibility of amending the former City of Toronto's special
demolition control legislation in the City of Toronto Act,
1984, so that the Act will apply to the whole of the urban
area of the new City.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact
Statement:
The costs of filing an application for special legislation
includes a filing fee of $150.00, the cost of publishing a notice
of application once a week for four weeks in the Ontario Gazette
and newspaper, the cost of printing the Private Bill and the cost
of printing the Act in the annual statutes. Based on 1996 costs
for a similar sized Private Bill, costs are estimated at
$6,000.00 with newspaper advertising costs being the largest
component.
Recommendations:
If your Committee recommends an application for special
legislation, it is recommended that:
(1) authority be granted to apply for special legislation
substantially in the form of the draft Private Bill attached to
this report.
Background:
The Urban Environment and Development Committee at its meeting
held on May 19th, 1998, had before it the May 1, 1998 report of
the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development entitled:
"City Powers, Policies and Procedures re: the Conversion to
Condominium and Demolition of Rental Housing before and after the
proclamation of the Tenant Protection Act". As set out in
Clause 4 of Report 7 of the Urban Environment and Development
Committee, the Committee recommended, among other matters, that
Council adopt the following recommendation:
(4) Council request the City Solicitor to review the
former City of Toronto's special demolition control
legislation and report back by June 1998 to the Urban
Environment and Development Committee on the feasibility of
amending the legislation in order to extend its provisions to
the other former municipalities in the new City;
("Recommendation (4)")
Discussion:
There are six pieces of special legislation that apply in the
former City of Toronto that have provisions dealing with
residential demolition matters that the Commissioner will be
considering in her overall review of demolition matters. The
Commissioner has confirmed, as set out in section 2a) of her May
1, 1998 report, that the special legislation being referred to in
Recommendation (4) is the City of Toronto Act, 1984, S.O.
1984, c. Pr6 (the "1984 Act"). A copy of the 1984 Act
is on file with the City Clerk.
In the case of the demolition of a building containing six or
more dwelling units and subject to certain exemptions, the 1984
Act permits Council to refuse to issue a demolition permit for up
to one year, even though a building permit has been issued to
erect a new building on the site. Under the 1984 Act Council also
has the ability to acquire and maintain the property for
residential use.
As noted in section 2 "Demolition Control" of the
Commissioner's May 1, 1998 report, after the proclamation of the Tenant
Protection Act Council will no longer have authority under
the Rental Housing Protection Act to require an owner to
apply to Council for approval to demolish a rental building. When
dealing with demolition applications Council will have to rely on
its powers under section 33 of the Planning Act
(respecting demolition permits) and, in the case of the
geographic area of the former City of Toronto, the 1984 Act and
other special legislation.
An application can be made for special legislation to extend
the application of the 1984 Act to the whole of the urban area of
the new City. The final format of any new legislation is subject
to the approval of the Provincial Legislative Counsel.
There are two matters that Council should be aware of in
considering the merits of proceeding with an application for
special legislation. The first consideration is time. Assuming a
June, 1998 proclamation date, it is not possible to receive
special legislation before the Tenant Protection Act, 1997,
is proclaimed in force. In order to have its maximum effect in
regulating the loss of rental housing due to demolition, the
special legislation would have to be received before the repeal
of the Rental Housing Protection Act under the Tenant
Protection Act, 1997. It is also expected that the House will
rise for its summer recess on June 25, 1998, and return on
September 28, 1998.
Under the rules of the Provincial Legislature on applications
for Private Bills (which includes applications by municipalities
for special legislation), a Private Bill will not receive first
reading until after a declaration proving publication of the
notices (once a week for four weeks in the Ontario Gazette and
newspaper) has been received by the Clerk of the House. The rules
also provide that applications for Private Bills that are
received after the first day of September in any calendar may
be postponed until the first regular Session in the next
following calendar year. Under these circumstances it is unlikely
that a successful application would be approved before the
winter.
The second matter for consideration, particularly in the case
of a majority government, is whether or not the Minister of
Municipal Affairs would support the application. After a Private
Bill receives first reading it is referred to the Standing
Committee on Regulations and Private Bills for hearings. The
Committee has authority to amend the Private Bill and may also
determine that the Private Bill should not be reported to the
House, i.e., the Private Bill dies at the Committee. There is
also the possibility that after the 1984 Act is specifically
drawn to the Minister's attention, that the Minister may take
action to have the 1984 Act repealed.
In order to expedite the overall processing of an application
for special legislation and as encouraged by the Standing
Committee's guidelines, the usual practice is to consult ahead of
time with Legislative Counsel on the form of the Private Bill,
and with Ministry of Municipal Affairs' staff on both the form
and content of the Private Bill, before giving notice and filing
the application for the Private Bill with the Clerk of the House.
This process also permits the City Solicitor and applicable
Commissioner to seek instructions from Council on any substantive
changes to the draft Private Bill being recommended by the
Province.
Attached to this report as Schedule A is a draft Private Bill.
Conclusion:
If your Committee wishes to recommend an application for
special legislation to extend the application of the 1984 Act to
the whole of the urban area of the new City, your Committee could
recommend the adoption of recommendation (1) of this report.
Contact Name:
Christina M. Cameron
Legal Services Division
392-7235
H.W.O. Doyle
City Solicitor
p:\1998\ug\cps\leg\UD980902.leg
SCHEDULE A
Bill Pr 1998
An Act Respecting the City of
Toronto
Preamble
The City of Toronto has
applied for special legislation with respect to applying the
provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 1984, respecting
demolition control, to the whole urban area of the City and
not just to the area of the former City of Toronto.
It is appropriate to grant
this application.
Therefore, Her Majesty, by and
with the advice and consent of the Legislative Assembly of
the Province of Ontario, enacts as follows:
Definitions
1. In this Act,
1997,c.2
"city" means the
City of Toronto incorporated by the City of Toronto
Act, 1997 (No. 1);
"urban area" has the
same meaning as in the City of Toronto Act, 1997 (No. 1).
Application
2. Despite clause 2(5)(a) of
the City of Toronto Act, 1997 (No.1), the provisions
of the 1984, c. Pr6 City of Toronto Act, 1984,
apply to the whole of the urban area of the city.
Commencement
3. This Act comes into force
on the day it receives Royal Assent.
Short title
4. The short title of this Act
is the City of Toronto Act, 1998.