June 19, 1998
Ms. Novina Wong
Clerk
City of Toronto
Station 1071, 7th Floor
Metro Hall
55 John Street
Toronto, Ontario
M5V 3C6
Dear Ms. Wong:
At its meeting on Wednesday, June 17, 1998, the
Commission considered the attached report entitled, "Project
Approval And Procurement Authorization - General Business
Computer."
The Commission approved the Recommendations
contained in the above report, as listed below:
"It is recommended that the Commission
approve:
1) Awarding a contract to GlassHouse Systems
Inc., in the amount of $1,433,900 to replace the existing IBM
9121/480 with an IBM 2003/225, including the hardware and IBM
operating system software;
2) An additional $350,000 for the transfer and
upgrade of existing third party (non IBM) software;
3) An additional $24,495 is required to pursue
the option to purchase nine additional channels, for a total
upset limit of $1,808,395;
4) Approval to declare the current IBM 9121/480
surplus and authorize the Manager of Materials & Procurement
to dispose of it in the best interest of the Commission;
5) Forward this report to the City of Toronto
Council requesting increased project approval be granted in the
amount of $1,608,395 gross ($731,820 net) by advancing approved
expenditures from future years; and
6) Authorize staff to proceed with the award of
this contract, due to the critical nature of the request and hold
in TTC accounts, pending City Council approval."
The foregoing is forwarded to City of Toronto
Council for the necessary approval, as detailed in the report.
Sincerely,
Vincent Rodo
General Secretary
1-64
Attachment
TORONTO TRANSIT COMMISSION
REPORT NO.
MEETING DATE: June 17, 1998
SUBJECT: PROJECT APPROVAL AND PROCUREMENT AUTHORIZATION -
GENERAL BUSINESS COMPUTER
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the
Commission approve:
1) Awarding a contract to
GlassHouse Systems Inc., in the amount of $1,433,900 to
replace the existing IBM 9121/480 with an IBM 2003/225,
including the hardware and IBM operating system software;
2) An additional $350,000
for the transfer and upgrade of existing third party (non
IBM) software;
3) An additional $24,495 is
required to pursue the option to purchase nine additional
channels, for a total upset limit of $1,808,395;
4) Approval to declare the
current IBM 9121/480 surplus and authorize the Manager of
Materials & Procurement to dispose of it in the best
interest of the Commission;
5) Forward this report to
the City of Toronto Council requesting increased project
approval be granted in the amount of $1,608,395 gross
($731,820 net) by advancing approved expenditures from future
years; and
6) Authorize staff to
proceed with the award of this contract, due to the critical
nature of the request and hold in TTC accounts, pending City
Council project approval.
FUNDING
Funds are available in the 1998
- 2002 Capital program under Information Technology
Infrastructure project within the Computer Equipment and Software
Program (pages 541-550), in the amount of $200,000 for 1998 and
$1,975,000 in the years 1999 - 2001. The total amount of
$1,608,395 is to be advanced to 1998 from future years upon the
approval from the City of Toronto.
BACKGROUND
In planning the 1998 budget it
was not known that the IBM mainframe (General Business Computer)
system software (VM/ESA and VSE/ESA) were not year 2000
compliant. An amount of $1,975,000 was budgeted for the years
1999 - 2001 to cover additional DASD requirements and mainframe
hardware/software replacement.
Subsequent to the budget plan
IBM declared that the VM/ESA and VSE/ESA system software are not
year 2000 compliant and must be replaced along with an
appropriate expanded mainframe. The cost of this upgrade is
$1,808,395. An advance of $1,608,395 from the years 1999 - 2001
is required immediately. For the period 1998 - 2001 the total
budget amount is reduced from $2,175,000 to $1,808,395 yielding a
savings of $366,605.
The General Business Computer is
an IBM mainframe supporting many mission critical applications,
including Materials Management, Vehicle Maintenance,
Personnel/Payroll and Finance General Ledger and Accounts
Payable. These applications are crucial to running daily
businesses at the TTC in order to operate an efficient and safe
public transit system.
The current version of the
system software required to operate the IBM mainframe is not
compliant to the year 2000 standards. The applications running in
this operating environment will fail as year 2000 approaches. All
date-dependent information will become inaccurate. In order to
provide the necessary testing environment immediately and the
future product environment, both system software components
(VM/ESA and VSE/ESA) must be upgraded immediately.
In order to run mainframe
applications successfully in year 2000, full-scale testing of all
applications on a mainframe that is fully year 2000 compliant
must commence no later than September 30, 1998. Failure to
thoroughly test these applications in a certified year 2000
compliant operating environment will expose the Commission to the
risk of being unable to maintain service.
DISCUSSION
Staff issued a tender for the
replacement of the IBM mainframe. Four companies were invited to
submit tenders in addition to a public advertisement appearing in
the Globe and Mail on Wednesday, April 22, 1998. Three companies
submitted responses (see Appendix 'A'). Glasshouse Systems Inc.
was judged to offer the best solution package at a cost of
$1,433,900. In their tender response Glasshouse Systems Inc.
identified the need for additional channels to match the total
number of channels on the existing IBM 9121/480. An additional
$24,495 is required to pursue this option. This includes the
hardware and IBM operating system software and technical
assistance and installation, as specified. The vendor will
certify that both the hardware and operating system software of
the replacement mainframe will satisfy the year 2000 compliance
requirements.
The vendors were requested to
submit a trade-in offer and removal costs for the current
IBM 9121/480. None of the vendors offered a trade-in value.
A leasing analysis was conducted
and the difference over three years was approximately $5,000 more
to own. The purchase option is recommended because at the end of
the term the Commission will own the IBM 2003/225 mainframe.
Whereas under the lease option, the Commission would have to buy
the mainframe at the end of the lease, bringing the total cost of
the lease/buy option over the straight purchase cost. As a matter
of note, the lease term would be three years. The Commission
intends to keep this mainframe for as long as seven years.
JUSTIFICATION
Failure to immediately award a
contract to replace the IBM mainframe and software within the
current schedule would result in our inability to create a year
2000 test environment which would negatively impact the current
Management Information Services initiatives to rectify year 2000
problems with application code. Not addressing these problems
would impact the ability of the TTC to maintain service.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
June 23, 1998
14.117.79
Appendix 'A'
Tenders were requested for the
supply and installation of an IBM Mainframe:
Company
GlassHouse Systems Inc. (Leasing
Option) $ 1,428,161
GlassHouse Systems Inc.
1,433,900* (1)
GSS Marketing Inc. (Leasing
Option) 1,437,947
GSS Marketing Inc. 1,450,270*
GlassHouse Systems Inc. (Option
2) 2,392,224
Cover-All Solutions Ctr. Inc.
4,501,969*
* prices have been adjusted.
(1) Recommended for award
STAFF SUMMARY SHEET
EXECUTIVE BRANCH |
PREPARED BY: Joseph ChanMANAGER - D.E.
Chalmers EXTENSION:
3373GENERAL MANAGER - V. Rodo
USER ID: JHCHANDATE
REQUIRED BY THE ORIGINATOR:
|
COMMISSION REPORT: PROJECT APPROVAL AND
PROCUREMENT AUTHORIZATION - GENERAL BUSINESS COMPUTER |
# |
ROUTING |
CONCUR |
NON-CONCUR |
DATE |
ATTACHMENT(S) |
6 |
CGM |
|
|
|
Commission Report |
|
GM - ENG. & CONST |
|
|
|
5 |
GM - EXECUTIVE |
|
|
|
|
GM - OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
APPROVAL REQUIRED BY CHAIR AND
VICE-CHAIR |
|
DEPUTY GM - SUBWAY |
|
|
|
___________________________
_____________ CHAIR
DATE
___________________________
_____________
VICE-CHAIR DATE
|
|
DEPUTY GM - SURFACE |
|
|
|
|
DEPUTY GM - CORPORATE |
|
|
|
4 |
GENERAL COUNSEL |
|
|
|
3 |
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER |
|
|
|
|
MGR - HUMAN RESOURCES |
|
|
|
2 |
MGR - M&P |
|
|
|
1 |
CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER |
|
|
|