City of Toronto  
HomeContact UsHow Do I...?Advanced search
Living in TorontoDoing businessVisiting TorontoAccessing City Hall
 
Accessing City Hall
Mayor
Councillors
Meeting Schedules
   
   
  City of Toronto Council and Committees
  All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.
   

 

August 24, 1998

To:Urban Environment and Development Committee

From:H.W.O. Doyle

Subject:Litigation in relation to the Province's proposal to put slot machines at Woodbine Racetrack

Purpose:

The purpose of this report is to inform Councillors of the litigation commenced by The Ontario Jockey Club ("the Jockey Club"), against the City of Toronto and the Chief Building Official and to request Council confirmation of the City Solicitor's actions.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

The Jockey Club has requested that it be awarded its costs of the litigation should it succeed.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that Council confirm the actions of the City Solicitor in this litigation to date in responding to the appeal of the Jockey Club, and, should the litigation be ongoing, instruct the City Solicitor to proceed.

Council Reference/Background/History:

On July 8, 1998 the Jockey Club applied for a building permit to "refurbish floor space to accommodate slot machines" at Woodbine Racetrack. Buildings Division staff refused the permit by informing the Jockey Club that slot machines are not listed as a permitted use or accessory use at that location.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

The Woodbine Racetrack site is in a Class 2 Industrial Zone. The Etobicoke Zoning Code permits "racetracks and ancillary facilities" in a Class 2 Industrial Zone. On August 7, 1998, the Jockey Club appealed the refusal of a building permit. The Jockey Club takes the position that slot machines are an "ancillary facility" to a racetrack. My staff have prepared affidavit material in support of the position that slot machines are not an "ancillary facility". The Jockey Club has been served with this material. The appeal is scheduled to be heard on September 16, 1998.

I will prepare further reports to the Urban Environment and Development Committee, and, if necessary, directly to Council, as this matter progresses.

Conclusions:

The actions of the City Solicitor should be confirmed, and, should the litigation be ongoing at the time this report is considered, the City Solicitor should be instructed to proceed with the litigation.

Contact Name:

Wendy Walberg (392-8078)

H.W.O. Doyle

City Solicitor

Legal Services

 

   
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.

 

City maps | Get involved | Toronto links
© City of Toronto 1998-2001