City of Toronto  
HomeContact UsHow Do I...?Advanced search
Living in TorontoDoing businessVisiting TorontoAccessing City Hall
 
Accessing City Hall
Mayor
Councillors
Meeting Schedules
   
   
  City of Toronto Council and Committees
  All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.
   

 

December 23, 1997

 

 

I am enclosing for your information and any attention deemed necessary, Clause No.  contained in Report No. 13 of The Environment and Public Space Committee, headed "", which was adopted, as amended, by the Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto at its meeting held on December 10 and 18, 1997.

 

May I draw your attention to the amendment by Council found at the beginning of the Clause.

 

Yours truly,

 

 

Metropolitan Clerk

 

R. Walton/csb

 

 

Clause embodied in Report No. 13 of The Environment and Public Space Committee, as adopted by the Council of The Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto at its meeting held on December 10 and 18, 1997.

 

1

BIOSOLIDS DEMONSTRATION FACILITY -

HARBOUR REMEDIATION & TRANSFER INC.

 

(The Metropolitan Council on December 10 and 18, 1997, amended this Clause by adding thereto the following:

 

"It is further recommended that:

 

(1) the confidential report dated December 9, 1997, from the Commissioner of Works, entitled `Beneficial Biosolids Re-use Demonstration - Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc.', be adopted, such report to remain confidential until approval for entering into the agreement with Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc., as appended to such report, is granted by the Financial Advisory Board;

 

(2) the Commissioner of Works be requested to submit a report to the appropriate Standing Committee of the new City of Toronto Council on the criteria which are to be used to determine the success of the biosolids re-use demonstration project;

 

(3) the Biosolids Monitoring Committee be disbanded and the Commissioner of Works, in consultation with the new City of Toronto Ward Councillors for Don River, Councillors Jack Layton and Pam McConnell, be requested to submit a report to the new City of Toronto Council, through the appropriate Standing Committee, on a public participation and monitoring process which will ensure immediate remediation of odour problems, should they occur in the future; and

 

(4) the Metropolitan Clerk be requested to append to the foregoing Clause the full text of the communication dated December 10, 1997, from the President and Chief Executive Officer, City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation (TEDCO).")

 

The Environment and Public Space Committee recommends:

 

(1) the adoption of the report dated November 20, 1997, from the Commissioner of Works;

 

(2) the adoption of the confidential report dated November 25, 1997, from the Metropolitan Solicitor, which was forwarded to Members of Council under "Confidential" cover; and

 

(3) that Council resolve into the Committee of the Whole to give consideration, in camera, to such confidential report.

 

The Environment and Public Space Committee submits the following report (November 20, 1997) from the Commissioner of Works:

 

Purpose:

 

To update the action plan for odour abatement at the Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc. facility, relating to the biosolids reuse demonstration project for mine tailings rehabilitation, and to seek authorization to provide funding to Terratec Environmental Ltd. for the expansion of its existing facility to allow for additional winter storage of biosolids from Metro for the beneficial reuse of the biosolids by direct application to farmland.

 

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

 

The increase of funds in the contract with Terratec Environmental Ltd. can be accommodated within the approved 1997 Operating Budget, Appropriation WP 210 Treatment, Repair and Replacement Account.

 

Recommendation:

 

It is recommended that authority be granted to amend the Agreement dated July 30, 1996, with Terratec Environmental Ltd. to provide funds up to $75,500.00, plus any applicable taxes, to Terratec Environmental Ltd. to expand its existing storage facility in order to accommodate extra quantities of biosolids during winter months for the biosolids reuse demonstration project, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Commissioner of Works and in a form acceptable to the Metropolitan Solicitor.

 

Council Reference/Background/History:

 

Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc. (HR&T) was contracted to carry out a five-year demonstration project for the beneficial reuse of biosolids from the Main Treatment Plant as an alternative to incineration. This project involves further treatment of the biosolids at the HR&T site at 97 Commissioners Street in the Toronto east portland area. In dealing with the odour issue related to the HR&T operations, Metropolitan Council, at its meeting of September 24 and 25, 1997, adopted, as amended, recommendations embodied in Clause No. 1 of Report No. 12 of The Environment and Public Space Committee, requesting the Commissioner of Works to submit a report to the Environment and Public Space Committee for its meeting on November 26, 1997, on an update respecting the HR&T project.

 

Pursuant to Council authorization at its meeting of September 24 and 25, 1997, Metro Legal has forwarded to HR&T an amending agreement to provide funds to HR&T for the necessary odour abatement upgrade at the HR&T site, and to allow for the supply of 50,000 dry tonnes of biosolids, in total, to HR&T over the term. The amending agreement has not yet been executed by HR&T and returned to Metro.

 

Metro Works staff met and reached a mutual agreement with HR&T that ORTECH Corporation, experts in odour control, be engaged by HR&T to develop and propose a plan of action for the identification and implementation of an effective solution to the odour problems related to the HR&T operations. ORTECH's expertise in the field of odour emission control related to large industrial operations is internationally recognized.

 

The approach of the action plan proposed by ORTECH differs somewhat from that of the original action plan proposed from HR&T as outlined in Clause No. 1 of Report No. 12 of The Environment and Public Space Committee, which was before Council at its meeting on September 24 and 25, 1997. The original action plan from HR&T submitted to Metro Works on September 17, 1997, consisted of chemical characterization of odorous substances that could be emitted from the biosolids and bench scale testing of the proposed odour control process. Both were proposed to be carried out in the laboratory, as well as pilot scale testing of an odour scrubber during normal operation at the HR&T facility, followed by design and full scale installation of the scrubbing equipment. The pilot testing of the scrubber would be conducted using different chemical solutions on a portion of the air emissions to be diverted from the existing emission control system during normal biosolids processing operations.

 

It was ORTECH's considered opinion that the laboratory chemical characterization and bench scale testing would not be an appropriate cost-effective approach in trying to resolve the odour problems associated with the HR&T facility; also, it would have to be followed by extensive pilot testing, which would require HR&T to continue operation for an extensive time period in order to obtain the necessary information and data for full scale equipment design.

 

ORTECH proposed the following three-stage program:

 

(1) emission characterization study - to collect and measure the odour emission rates of representative air samples from six major emission sources at the existing HR&T facility during normal operating conditions for a two-week period, using sensory evaluation technique and dispersion modelling;

 

(2) engineering assessment of odour abatement technologies - based on the emission data obtained in the characterization study, to undertake an engineering assessment of the various odour abatement technologies to determine the preferred solution, possibly without the need of undertaking pilot testing; should the assessment of the abatement technologies indicate that a technology such as biological filtration is the only effective option, then extensive pilot testing will be required; a report will be submitted recommending the selected odour abatement technology complete with cost estimates and a timetable for a turnkey program; and

 

(3) the design and full scale installation of the selected odour abatement technology.

 

Considering the earlier timeframe to characterize the odours and have a recommended solution based on limited full-scale operation, the emission characterization study was estimated to be completed in a two-week period, and completion of the engineering assessment of odour abatement technologies in four weeks. ORTECH has estimated that a six-month period would be required for the custom design and full-scale installation of the selected odour abatement equipment. The timeframe for the completion of the three-stage program would be about eight months.

 

The proposed plan of action by ORTECH was reviewed and accepted by HR&T, Metro Works staff and the Ministry of Environment and Energy (MOEE). ORTECH was then retained by HR&T to carry out the emission characterization study as proposed at a total estimated cost of $32,000.00 plus any applicable taxes. Metro will reimburse HR&T for the cost of the study.

 

On October 17, 1997, the MOEE issued a temporary Notice of Amendment to HR&T's Certificate of Approval - Air, No. 8-3654-95-979 (C of A) to allow the HR&T facility to operate for a 30-day period in order to carry out the short-term characterization study. The 30-day period takes effect on commencement of operation of the HR&T facility. A letter under the same date from the MOEE Approvals Branch was sent, care of Metro Works, to members and interested persons of the Community Biosolids Monitoring Committee, advising of the issuance of the Notice of Amendment to the C of A.

 

The schedule drawn up by ORTECH for the sampling and measurements of the odour emissions for the emission characterization study was forwarded to the MOEE. Under a cover letter dated October 27, 1997, Metro Works also sent a copy of the schedule, for information, to Councillors Peter Tabuns and Jack Layton, Councillors respectively for the City of Toronto and Metro representing the ward in which HR&T is located.

 

On Friday, October 24, 1997, Metro Works started to supply HR&T with biosolids, as requested by HR&T, to allow ORTECH to carry out the necessary emission sampling which had been scheduled for completion on November 3, 1997. For the period from October 24 to 30, 1997, HR&T operated on a total of six days. For the first three days, HR&T operated at nighttime hours from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 a.m., in accordance with an amendment to HR&T's C of A (site), which temporarily allowed HR&T to change their operating times from the normal day to nighttime hours. This amendment expired on October 27, 1997, therefore, HR&T reverted to the normal daytime hours between 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on October 28, 1997. On October 30, 1997, Metro Works received an odour complaint from the business community in the surrounding area. As a result, HR&T halted their operation which was rescheduled, with MOEE approval, to nighttime hours on November 12, 1997, in order to minimize the odour impact on the community while allowing ORTECH to collect their last set of samples necessary for the completion of the characterization study. The November 12, 1997 schedule was later postponed to November 19, 1997, to allow for further discussion of the program with Councillor Layton, when HR&T operated 12 hours only from 7:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. the following morning, which enabled ORTECH to complete the emission sampling. ORTECH's preliminary report on the odour characterization will be available on November 26, 1997, for the meeting of the Environment and Public Space Committee. All members of the Biosolids Monitoring Committee and interested parties in the community were notified of the final testing process, as per the attached flyer on November 18, 1997.

 

At a meeting on November 13, 1997, we received a verbal estimate from ORTECH on the cost and amount of time required to install the necessary odour control equipment at the HR&T facility. The estimate was between $1,500,000.00 and $2,000,000.00, with 30 weeks to design and install the odour control equipment to meet MOEE requirements. It is important to note that this estimate is only for the design and installation of the necessary equipment, and does not include any mark-up or administration cost for HR&T.

 

Given the divergence between the existing Council authority of September 24 and 25, 1997, and the estimate from ORTECH, we will need to discuss options with HR&T and recommend a proposed course of action in conjunction with the Metropolitan Solicitor, and report to Council on December 10, 1997.

 

Another biosolids reuse demonstration project is being carried out by Terratec Environmental Ltd. (Terratec). Under a five-year contract with Metro, Terratec is required to remove and beneficially utilize 50,000 dry tonnes of biosolids on agricultural land. Council at the meeting of September 24 and 25, 1997, by adoption of Clause No. 1, as amended, of Report No. 12 of The Environment and Public Space Committee, approved the recommendations embodied in the report dated September 3, 1997, from the Commissioner of Works, thereby authorizing that the Agreement with Terratec be amended to allow Terratec, when needed by Metro, to remove and handle quantities of biosolids in excess of the original contractual requirements for an additional cost of $39.00 per dry tonne. This cost is to cover the expenses of Terratec for temporary acquisition of additional trucks and biosolids application equipment as and when required.

 

The odour abatement program presently underway to upgrade the HR&T facility is expected to continue possibly for a period of more than four months through the winter season, during which time HR&T would not be processing biosolids from the Main Treatment Plant. In this light, we approached and discussed with Terratec the possibility of removing and applying to farmland quantities of biosolids, in total, up to twice the original estimated requirements through the coming winter months. This would avoid starting up and operating another incinerator at the Main Treatment Plant, thereby reducing the amounts of biosolids incineration.

 

We were advised by Terratec that since biosolids can only be applied to farmland in the spring and fall, the existing biosolids storage lagoon, which had been constructed based on the original quantities, will need to be enlarged in order to accommodate the extra quantities of biosolids during the winter months; the work to enlarge the storage lagoon can be completed before the end of December, 1997.

 

The total estimated costs for the enlargement of the storage lagoon amount to $75,500.00, plus applicable taxes. This amount is equivalent to an extra $1.51 per dry tonne of biosolids over the contract price of $85.00 per dry tonne, calculated based on the removal and beneficial land use of the originally contracted quantities of 50,000 dry tonnes of biosolids over the five-year term of the demonstration project. We recommend that funds up to $75,500.00, plus applicable taxes, be provided to Terratec to upgrade its existing biosolids storage facility to accommodate extra quantities of biosolids, in order to minimize biosolids incineration during the period when HR&T is not operating. These funds would be provided after Terratec has signed an amending agreement on terms satisfactory to the Commissioner of Works and in a form satisfactory to the Metropolitan Solicitor.

 

Conclusions:

 

At its meeting of September 24 and 25, 1997, Council adopted Clause No. 1, as amended, of Report No. 12 of The Environment and Public Space Committee, thereby authorizing that the agreement with HR&T be amended to allow for the supply of 50,000 dry tonnes in total to HR&T for the biosolids reuse demonstration project, and to provide funds up to $600,000.00 to HR&T for identification and implementation of the necessary odour abatement upgrade at the HR&T facility. As mutually agreed, HR&T has retained ORTECH to undertake an emission characterization study, as an initial step in selecting an effective odour abatement technology to be implemented at the HR&T facility. As the estimated cost of remedial action exceeds existing Council authority, further discussions are underway with HR&T, and we will report further to the December 10, 1997 meeting of Council.

 

Under a five-year contract with Metro, Terratec is carrying out another demonstration project to apply the biosolids to farmland. Metro Works staff has requested Terratec to handle extra quantities of biosolids that HR&T is supposed to remove and process during the coming winter months, when the upgrade work at the HR&T facility is expected to take place. In order to accommodate the extra biosolids through the winter months, the existing storage facility of Terratec needs to be enlarged. The estimated costs for the enlargement of the storage facility amount to $75,500.00 plus applicable taxes. We recommend that funds up to $75,500.00, plus applicable taxes, be provided to Terratec to upgrade its storage facility to handle extra quantities of biosolids over the original contractual requirements, in order to reduce biosolids incineration at the Main Treatment Plant.

 

Summary Chart:

 

This report conforms with the following:

 

 

 

Council Approved Three-year Plan (n/a)

 

Corporate Personnel and

Administrative Policies (n/a)

 

 

Approved Capital Budget (n/a)

 

 

Approved Current Budget (x)

 

Standing Committee Approved

Program Priority (n/a)

 

 

Metro Official Plan (n/a)

 

Contact Name and Telephone Number:

 

Mr. R. M. Pickett, Director, Water Pollution Control, (416) 392-8230.

 

 

The Environment and Public Space Committee reports, for the information of Council, having also had before it during consideration of the foregoing matter the following:

 

(i) confidential report (November 25, 1997) from the Metropolitan Solicitor in connection with the foregoing matter;

 

(ii) communication (September 26, 1997) from the Assistant City Clerk, City of Toronto, advising that the Council of the City of Toronto, at its meeting on September 22 and 23, 1997, had before it a motion respecting the operation of the biosolids demonstration project at 97 Commissioners Street by Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc.; and that City Council took the following action:

 

(1) rescinded its previous action of July 14, 1997, with respect to Clause 2 of Board of Health Report No. 7, headed "Biosolids Demonstration Facility - 97 Commissioners Street (Ward 8)";

 

(2) requested the appropriate City staff, in consultation with staff from the Toronto Economic Development Corporation, to jointly report to City Council on October 6, 1997, on the feasibility of providing assistance to HR&T in a form such as provided to National Rubber, Harkow Aggregates, and The Irish Rover: a loan and/or an increase in monthly rent to reflect improvements to bring this operation into full production, and conditional upon the odour concerns being addressed;

 

(3) strongly urged Metropolitan Toronto Council to provide the necessary support, whether financial for upgrades to the odour control systems or for a change in the material delivered to HR&T from its sewage treatment plant, to ensure that this important demonstration project can continue;

 

(4) requested Metro Works staff to provide staff of City Works Services full details of all studies presently underway dealing with HR&T;

 

(5) requested Metro Works staff to provide an update report to Toronto City Council on the results of the investigations and actions taken or planned, prior to its meeting of October 6, 1997;

 

(6) requested the Ministry of Environment and Energy to immediately monitor the project and ensure that it is in compliance with its Certificate of Approval and amended Certificate;

 

(7) reaffirmed its opposition to incineration as an acceptable treatment of sewage sludge;

 

(8) requested the Commissioner of City Works Services, the Medical Officer of Health and Toronto Economic Development Corporation to report to the next meeting of City Council on October 6, 1997, on the suitability of the sludge provided to HR&T for processing, and any other issues that may arise from improperly processed material;

 

(9) asked Metropolitan Toronto Council and the Ministry of Environment and Energy to comment on the apparent unsuitability of the material provided to HR&T and that their comments be provided to City Council on October 6, 1997; and

 

(10) directed the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto to provide properly digested sludge to HR&T; and

 

(iii) communication (October 22, 1997) from the Assistant City Clerk, City of Toronto, advising that the Council of the City of Toronto, at its meeting on October 6 and 7, 1997, had before it a motion respecting the operation of the biosolids demonstration project at 97 Commissioners Street by Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc.; and that City Council took the following action:

 

(1) requested Metro Works staff to provide the Community Biosolids Monitoring Committee with an opportunity to review and comment on the results of the bench scale testing prior to proceeding with any on-site pilot testing of new odour control equipment for the HR&T biosolids demonstration project;

 

(2) authorized the Toronto Economic Development Corporation (TEDCO) to adjust its budget and enter into an agreement with Harbour Remediation and Transfer similar in form to that of National Rubber, Harkow Aggregates and The Irish Rover, to provide up to $1.5 million for site improvements as a loan and/or an increase in monthly rent;

 

(3) instructed that the Board and management of TEDCO be satisfied that the odour concerns related to the operations of HR&T are addressed prior to the execution of the terms of the new agreement;

 

(4) directed that TEDCO receive the appropriate approval from the Financial Advisory Board prior to the execution of the terms of an agreement and the dispersal of funds;

 

(5) requested TEDCO to provide an update to the new City Council on the progress of the odour control upgrade and the agreement with HR&T; and

 

(6) requested staff to report back to the first meeting of City Council after the November 10, 1997 Municipal Election on its status.

 

Ms. Karey Shinn, Co-Chair, Public Committee for Safe Sewage Treatment in Metropolitan Toronto, appeared before the Environment and Public Space Committee in connection with the foregoing matter, and filed a submission with respect thereto.

 

(A copy of each of the attachments referred to in the foregoing report has been forwarded to all Members of Council, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the Metropolitan Clerk.)

 

(The Metropolitan Council on December 10 and 18, 1997, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following communication (December 10, 1997) from Mr. Erkki Pukonen, President and Chief Executive Officer, City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation:

We understand that a letter dated August 1, 1997 from Harbour Remediation & Transfer to the Chair of the City of Toronto Economic Development Committee is part of the correspondence before Metro Council today on the Harbour Remediation & Transfer item. Although it is not likely germaine to the issue you are considering, for the record we wish to correct errors contained in the attachment. Note that these errors were corrected before Toronto City Council at their September 22, 1997, meeting. We have kept the attached comments brief but will be more than willing to expand on them.

 

Recall that TEDCO is a self-financing, arm's length corporation owned by the City of Toronto. Our mandate is to work closely with our shareholder and partners to pursue opportunities which assist in retaining, expanding and attracting businesses that will help create and retain jobs, while ensuring that our efforts are complementary to the City's overall economic development strategy. TEDCO fulfils its mandate through the support of a number of business development initiatives and through real estate development.

 

In 1996, TEDCO had an excess of revenue over expenses of $3.0 million on revenues of $8.2 million. Included in the expenses was a subsidy of $2.4 million to the Toronto Harbour Commissioners. Since TEDCO assumed responsibility for lands in the Port Area (a total of 430 acres), TEDCO has increased revenues by 19 per cent., leased an additional 67 acres of land and reached full occupancy by leasing 374,000 square feet of building space. TEDCO has also successfully effected the environmental remediation of a number of sites setting several precedent within the GTA and the Province.

 

 

TEDCO Comments on the Attachment to the August 1, 1997 letter from HR&T

 

OCETA - 63 Polson Street

 

As a not-for-profit business incubator, the Ontario Centre for Environmental Technology Advancement has a mandate to assist small and medium sized environmental firms. OCETA leases the 3,000 square foot second floor from us at 63 Polson Street in the Port Area.

 

TEDCO renovated the entire 20,000 square foot building for the approximate budget amount identified, not just the second floor. This investment is being recovered through market rents earned from the fully leased building.

 

TEDCO is at the end of a four year commitment to provide a total of $450,000.00 towards operating funding to OCETA. This grant was matched by $6 million in funding from both the Federal and Provincial governments. TEDCO has no record of additional funds expended on a study.

 

 

 

Harkow Recycling - 75 Commissioners Street

 

TEDCO is currently marketing a number of sites in the Port Area on a design/build basis whereby TEDCO would construct a building from an end user with end user committing to pay a blended market land and building rent. The Harkow lease is a hybrid of this industry accepted arrangement whereby Harkow pays rent for the land and a mortgage payment at a market interest rate for the building.

 

The loan between TEDCO and Harkow has not been forgiven and there has been no discussion whatsoever of this kind.

 

Marland 1 - 176 Cherry Street and Marland II - 20 Polson Street

 

Marland I and Marland II (formerly Portland-Castlepoint and Maris View) are successor corporations for long term leases on Polson Quay. The new leases incorporated the negotiated resolution to several issues.

 

No funds were provided to either corporation from TEDCO, rather outstanding rents were repaid to TEDCO and the Toronto Harbour Commissioners.

 

Cinespace Studios - 629 Eastern Avenue

 

In 1992, TEDCO loaned $4 million to the studio at market rates by way of a mortgage second to the CIBC. A trustee in bankruptcy was appointed in the latter part of 1995 and following much negotiation a portion only was recovered through a settlement with the CIBC. The loan was not forgiven.

 

National Rubber - 99 Commissioners Street

 

National Rubber was TEDCO's first design/build, a marketing/leasing strategy TEDCO is using within the Port Area. The TEDCO investment in the building is recovered through the market land and building rent paid by National Rubber.

 

A private road owned by TEDCO is the means of access for National Rubber and five other properties. The upgrade undertaken raised the standard of the road from a pothole-ridden grave/mud road to an asphalt covered one (in fact, a demonstration of the reuse of petroleum contaminated soils) with proper services. This road is presently being designed as part of a further upgrade to municipal standards of roads and services, a 1998 capital project.

 

Irish Rover Pub - 2 Villiers Street

 

The Irish Rover Pub opened this past summer in a renovated 7,000 square foot building of ours. The pub/restaurant provides much needed foot services opportunities to the workers in the Port Area. As part of our lease, TEDCO funded certain landlord improvements to the base building. This investment is recovered through the market rent paid by the Pub.

 

As a benefit to the Pub and the businesses in the area, TEDCO also cleaned up the remainder of the 2 Villiers site as a public green area. This work included the environmental remediation of the site.

 

Portland Fashion Centre - 10 Portland Street

 

Conceived in 1987, the Portland Fashion Centre was to be a multi-storey commercial/industrial building constructed on this Parking Authority of Toronto car park at Front, east of Bathurst. Funds invested in the project covered the range of development and land acquisition costs. George Brown College was a long shot at a tennant for a portion of the space. No funds were provided to the College. The Parking Authority is currently under contract to sell the site.)

 

(The Metropolitan Council also had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, a communication (December 10, 1997) from Ms. Linda Lynch, Government Liaison/Agent for Harkow Recycling Ltd. (Harkow), Environment Watch Inc., submitted by Metropolitan Councillor Joan King, North York - Seneca Heights, expressing concerns regarding erroneous information contained in a communication dated August 1, 1997, from Harbour Remediation and Transfer Inc. (HR&T), addressed to the Chair of the City of Toronto Economic Development Committee, which was before the Environment and Public Space Committee on November 26, 1997; advising that such communication from HR&T states that the City of Toronto has "forgiven substantial loans to other portland area business (sic)" and the attachment thereto purports to describe a loan to Harkow which, Mr. C. Costa alleges, was "later forgiven by Council"; that this information is incorrect in that Harkow has never been the recipient of a loan from the City of Toronto that has later been forgiven; and attaching a communication from Harkow to HR&T which addresses this matter.)

 

(The Metropolitan Council, also had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, a confidential report (December 9, 1997) from the Commissioner of Works.)

 

   
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.

 

City maps | Get involved | Toronto links
© City of Toronto 1998-2001