City of Toronto  
HomeContact UsHow Do I...?Advanced search
Living in TorontoDoing businessVisiting TorontoAccessing City Hall
 
Accessing City Hall
Mayor
Councillors
Meeting Schedules
   
   
  City of Toronto Council and Committees
  All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.
   

 

March 12, 1998

 

 

The Honourable Norm Sterling

Minister of Environment

Province of Ontario

135 St. Clair Avenue West, 12th Floor

Toronto, Ontario

M4V 1P5

 

Sir:

 

I am enclosing for your information and any attention deemed necessary, Clause No. 1 contained in Report No. 2 of The Works and Utilities Committee, headed ABeneficial Use of Biosolids; Odour Containment and Termination of Incineration at Main Treatment Plant@, which was adopted, as amended, by the Council of the City of Toronto at its meeting held on March 4, 5 and 6, 1998.

 

May I draw your attention to the recommendations adopted by Council, in particular, the following:

 

A(4) the Province of Ontario be urged to release the necessary regulations to facilitate beneficial use of biosolids@.

 

Yours truly,

 

 

 

City Clerk

 

R. Walton/csb

 

Encl.

 

Clause sent to: Minister of Environment, Province of Ontario

Councillor Tom Jakobek

Councillor Sandra Bussin

Councillor Jack Layton

Councillor Pam McConnell

Works and Utilities Committee

Interim Functional Lead for Water/Wastewater Operations

Ms. Karen Buck

Chair, Safe Sewage Committee

Ms. Margaret Blair, Lakeside Area Neighbourhoods Association

President of Operations, Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc.

 

Clause embodied in Report No. 2 of the Works and Utilities Committee, as adopted by the Council of the City of Toronto at its meeting held on March 4, 5 and 6, 1998.

 

 

 

 

1

Beneficial Use of Biosolids;

Odour Containment and Termination of

Incineration at Main Treatment Plant

 

(City Council on March 4, 5 and 6, 1998, amended this Clause by:

 

(1) striking out and referring Recommendation No. (1) of the Works and Utilities Committee back to the Committee for further consideration and resubmission to the next regular meeting of Council to be held on Thursday, April 16, 1998, viz.:

 

A(1) incineration at the Main Treatment Plant be stopped no later than January 1, 1999, and that the Interim Functional Lead for Water/Wastewater Operations be requested to report to the next meeting of the Committee, scheduled to be held on March 25, 1998, on the feasibility of such date;@; and

 

(2) striking out Recommendation No. (2) of the Works and Utilities Committee and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

 

A(2) Harbour Remediation and Transfer Inc. be authorized to start testing immediately;@.)

 

The Works and Utilities Committee recommends that:

 

(1) incineration at the Main Treatment Plant be stopped no later than January 1, 1999, and that the Interim Functional Lead for Water/Wastewater Operations be requested to report to the next meeting of the Committee, scheduled to be held on March 25, 1998, on the feasibility of such date;

 

(2) the Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc. facility not be restarted for testing of any kind until a report is submitted for approval of the Works and Utilities Committee outlining the additional odour controls which will be in place at that time;

 

(3) an odour containment program be implemented at the Main Treatment Plant, and that the Interim Functional Lead for Water/Wastewater Operations be requested to submit a report to the next meeting of the Committee on the measures taken to ensure that odours are monitored and reduced, such report to also provide the history and operational information related to the biosolids loading building at the Main Treatment Plant;

 

(4) the Province of Ontario be urged to release the necessary regulations to facilitate beneficial use of biosolids; and

 

(5) the proposed Biosolids Management and Implementation Plan be submitted to the Works and Utilities Committee, and that it include the following components:

 

(i) a 100 percent diversion from incineration target with an appropriate timeline;

 

(ii) an independent, expert evaluation panel as previously endorsed by Metropolitan Council;

 

(iii) the necessary expert staffing plan to support the Plan;

 

(iv) a strategy for inviting and considering a wide range of alternative technologies and processes for beneficial use of biosolids;

 

(v) a process for involvement of citizens in the process of developing, refining and monitoring the beneficial use of biosolids, such process to be developed in conjunction with the Councillors for the Don River and East Toronto wards; and

 

(vi) consideration of a rapid shift of biosolids to existing biosolids processing facilities in Southern Ontario.

 

The Works and Utilities Committee reports, for the information of Council, having requested the Interim Functional Lead for Water/Wastewater Operations to:

 

(1) submit a report to every other meeting of the Committee on the status of the biosolids program;

 

(2) submit a report to the Committee on:

 

(i) the optimal time for restarting the Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc. demonstration project;

 

(ii) the costs to accelerate odour abatement at the Main Treatment Plant;

 

(iii) odour control processes in place at the Highland Creek Treatment Plant and the Humber Treatment Plant;

 

(iv) information referred to during the meeting respecting the sewage treatment plant in Hamilton, Ontario; and

 

(v) undertaking a series of testing of samples of sludges through other existing locations; and

 

(3) involve outside consultants in the preparation of future Requests for Proposals for biosolids treatment.

 

The Works and Utilities Committee submits the following report (January 29, 1998) from the Interim Functional Lead for Water/Wastewater Operations:

 

Recommendation:

 

That this report be received for information.

 

Council Reference/Background/History:

 

At its meeting held on January 14, 1998, when dealing with Clause No. 1 of Report No. 13 of The Environment and Public Space Committee, headed ABiosolids Demonstration Facility - Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc.@, adopted as amended by Metropolitan Council on December 10 and 18, 1997, the Works and Utilities Committee deferred consideration of this matter, with a request that the appropriate staff submit a report to the next meeting on the status of the project, and on further demonstration projects which move towards 100 percent diversion of biosolids from incineration.

 

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

 

We have signed the Amended Agreement with Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc. (HR&T) that was attached to Clause No. 1 of Report No. 13 of The Environment and Public Space Committee approved by Metropolitan Council at its meeting of December 10 and 18, 1997.

 

The consultant engaged by HR&T to characterize the odours and odour sources last fall has been engaged to design and install the new odour control facilities. Until these facilities are installed, no biosolids will be shipped to HR&T. The only exception to this condition would be to test possible odour equipment or unless full scale operation is required to assist in the design of the new system. Such operation would be short in duration and all precautions would be taken to reduce and control the impact on the community. If testing is required, prior notification to the local councillors and the community will be undertaken.

 

It is anticipated that the fully designed system will be in place by July 1998 for full operation.

 

As part of the Main Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment, an assessment of biosolids management alternatives was undertaken to:

 

(a) determine the preferred strategy for meeting future solids treatment needs in the Main Treatment Plant service area; and

 

(b) address public concerns regarding incineration.

 

 

 

The assessment identified four alternatives to incineration; they were direct land application, alkaline stabilization, thermal drying and composting. It recommended demonstrating these alternatives before moving into full scale operation in order to ensure:

 

(1) reliability and diversity of end use markets;

 

(2) regulatory acceptance and compliance;

 

(3) public acceptance; and

 

(4) economic viability.

 

We have two demonstration projects, one which covers direct land applications, Terratec Environmental Limited, and one which covers alkaline stabilization, Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc. Each project is diverting 10,000 dry tonnes of solids from the incineration process at the Main Treatment Plant.

 

The following plan has been proposed for the demonstration of the thermally dried and the composted alternatives.

 

(1) A Toronto Biosolids Management and Implementation Plan will be formally initiated to chart the next steps in demonstration projects to achieve 100 percent biosolids utilization.

 

(2) A public workshop will be held in the spring of 1998 for all interested stakeholders, including industry representatives, to discuss ideas regarding the development of demonstration projects for a composted product and a thermally dried product.

 

(3) Following the workshop, a draft strategy document for further biosolids utilization will be issued for public comment in the summer of 1998.

 

(4) Upon completion of the strategy document, an Expression of Interest will be issued to the marketplace to obtain preliminary cost estimates and confirm the scope of the project with interested suppliers. A report will be forwarded to Committee and Council outlining estimated costs and confirmation of the terms of reference for a Request for Proposals (RFP).

 

(5) Subsequent to approval to proceed, an RFP will be issued to engage the marketplace in the identification of the appropriate technologies, markets and associated costs. After evaluation of the proposals, a recommendation will be made to Committee and Council.

 

(6) Approval for these two demonstration projects will be sought from Committee and Council in early 1999.

 

Conclusion:

 

We will continue to work with HR&T to ensure that the odour control equipment will resolve their odour problems, and to allow the alkaline stabilization process to be adequately demonstrated.

 

In addition, we will move forward the plan, as described, to demonstrate the two other alternatives identified in the Main Treatment Plant Environmental Assessment: composting and thermal drying.

 

Contact Name:

 

Mr. R.M. Pickett, Director, Water Pollution Control

Telephone: (416) 392-8230, Fax: 397-0908

E-mail: bob_pickett@metrodesk.metrotor.on.ca

 

CCCC

 

The following persons appeared before the Works and Utilities Committee in connection with the foregoing matter:

 

- Ms. Karen Buck, Toronto, Ontario, and submitted a communication with respect thereto;

- Ms. Karey Shinn, Chair, Public Committee for Safe Sewage Treatment in Metropolitan Toronto, and submitted a communication with respect thereto;

- Mr. Peter Smith, Lakeside Area Neighbourhoods Association;

- Mr. Dharmendra K. Rai, Plant Manager, Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc.; and

- Councillor Pam McConnell, Don River.

 

(City Council on March 4, 5 and 6, 1998, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following report (March 2, 1998) from the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services:

 

Purpose:

 

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with additional information with respect to Clause No. 1 of Report No. 2 of The Works and Utilities Committee given the timely need for pre-design testing and pilot evaluation prior to the warmer weather in April-May 1998.

 

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

 

There are no financial or funding implications.

 

Recommendation:

 

It is recommended that this report be received for information.

 

Council Reference/Background/History:

 

At its meeting held on February 11, 1998, when dealing with Clause No. 1 of Report No. 2 of The Works and Utilities Committee, entitled ABiosolids Demonstration Facility - Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc.@ (HR&T), in consideration of this matter, requested that the HR&T facility not be restarted for testing of any kind until a report is submitted to Works Committee outlining the additional odour control measures which will be in place at that time. Under the terms of the amending agreement, dated December 9, 1997, entered into between the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto and Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc., approval of the scope of the Odour Control Work, including all retainers and work plans, was delegated to the Commissioner. HR&T is to use its best efforts to undertake and complete the work as approved by the Commissioner and recommence the processing of biosolids. Given the potential delay associated with the Commissioner reporting back through the Works and Utilities Committee to Council and the potential effect of any delay on the currently permitted downtime period, it is appropriate that the report on restarting for testing be considered by Council at its meeting of March 4, 1998.@

 

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

 

The HR&T biosolids processing operations have been suspended last year due to related odour problems. A general plan of action to address the problem has recently been prepared. The plan is based on a previously completed odour survey and odour characterization study by ORTECH Consultants. Zorix Consultants Inc. (Zorix) (formerly ORTECH Volatile Organic Group) has been engaged by HR&T to design and manage the Odour Control Improvement Project and to provide environmental consulting services.

 

In order for the Odour Control Improvement Project to proceed, Zorix needs to collect additional data from HR&T=s biosolids processing plant, under normal operation. This is needed in order to conduct the essential pre-design testing and pilot evaluation work on new odour control equipment. The main reason for undertaking this work is to ensure that any investments in a final odour control system will be made on sound technical and economic basis. In addition, odour control technology suppliers will need to be comfortable with their pilot evaluations before HR&T and Zorix commit them to the necessary performance criteria.

 

Zorix is planning to test a McCarthy Robinson two-stage pilot scrubber, a Ceilcote chemical scrubber and a modified lime injection system (see attached pilot evaluation setup diagram). Zorix has proposed the following two test runs in order to test and evaluate the new pilot odour treatment components:

 

(1) To evaluate the odour control performance of a McCarthy Robinson two-stage pilot scrubber:

 

- operating for five consecutive days at eight hours per day. The first two operating eight-hour periods will be overnight with the remaining three operating periods during day-time hours.

 

(2) To evaluate the odour control performance of a Ceilcote chemical scrubber, the effectiveness of a modified lime-injection system and any necessary validation tests on the McCarthy Robinson two-stage pilot scrubber:

 

- operating for five consecutive days at eight hours per day. The first two operating eight-hour periods will be overnight with the remaining three operating periods during day-time hours.

 

 

The daytime periods are required to allow air samples to be delivered to the analytical laboratory for analysis. The two test runs are planned around a two week interim period so that Zorix will be able to assess sample analyses and establish odour control criteria and performance levels. The biosolids processed during the two test runs would be brought back to the Main Treatment Plant, by HR&T, for temporary storage where the biosolids will be covered to prevent odour emissions. This material will again be taken by HR&T when they are back in normal operation with the new odour control system and reprocessed, if necessary.

 

Zorix, on behalf of HR&T, has recently contacted the Approvals Branch of the Ministry of the Environment (MOE) with a request for the related temporary amendment to their Certificate of Approval (Air) No. 8-3654-95-979. After HR&T receives approval from the MOE, we will ensure the community is notified of the testing program in conjunction with the local Councillors.

 

Conclusion:

 

In order for the Odour Control Improvement Project to proceed, additional data must be collected from HR&T=s biosolids processing plant, under operating conditions to test new odour control equipment. This data is required in order to conduct the essential pre-design testing and pilot evaluation work on the new odour control equipment and to ensure that any investments in a final odour control system will be made based on sound technical and economic information.

 

Contact Name:

 

Mr. R. M. Pickett, P. Eng., Director, Water Pollution Control, Telephone No. (416) 392-8230, Fax No. (416) 397-0980, and e-mail: bob_pickett@metrodesk.metrotor.on.ca.)

 

(A copy of the pilot evaluation setup diagram, referred to in the foregoing report, is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

 

(City Council also had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following communications:

 

(i) (February 18, 1998) from the President of Operations, Harbour Remediation & Transfer Inc., seeking permission to commence testing of new scrubbers and other control equipment

 

(ii) (February 25, 1998) from Ms. K. Shinn, Chair, The Safe Sewage Committee, providing information regarding the new Sludge Application Regulations (SARS).)

 

   
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.

 

City maps | Get involved | Toronto links
© City of Toronto 1998-2001