Business Case Review of the
"Works Best Practices Program"
The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations of the Budget
Committee embodied in the following transmittal letter (September 16, 1998) from the City Clerk:
Recommendations:
The Budget Committee on September 15, 1998 recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and
Council:
(1)the adoption of the supplementary joint report (September 9, 1998) from the Chief Administrative Officer, the Chief
Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services, wherein it recommended that:
(a)Toronto Council endorse continuance of the Works Best Practices Program, described herein, and with the additional
control and reporting methodologies;
(b)funding in the amount of $1.908 million (in Water Supply Appropriation WS026) be approved from the Water Supply
Capital Financing Reserve;
(c)subject to recommendation (b) above, authority be granted for an expenditure of $1.908 million after the Municipal
Goods and Services Tax Rebate, to continue implementation of the Best Practices Program;
(d)the costs associated with staff downsizing and retraining, along with computer hardware and software replacement, be
financed from the reduction in expenditures in the Works Best Practices Program. The annual cost avoidance will be
identified separately in the Water Supply Capital Financing Stabilization Reserve and the Water Pollution Control
Measures Reserve Fund; and
(e)the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto;
(2)that a benefits tracking program be developed and upon completion, the Commissioner of Works and Emergency
Services report back to the Works and Utilities Committee as to the final form being accepted; and
(3)the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services provide a report to the Works and Utilities Committee every six
months on the benefits tracking program, and a copy be provided to the Budget Committee for information.
The Budget Committee reports having received the joint report (July 23, 1998) from the Chief Administrative Officer, the
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services.
Background:
The Budget Committee on September 15, 1998, had before it the following:
(a)joint report (July 23, 1998) from the Chief Administrative Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the
Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services;
(b)communication (August 5, 1998) from Mr. Bob Toop, National Representative, Toronto Civic Employees' Union,
C.U.P.E., Local 416;
(c)supplementary joint report (September 9, 1998) from the Chief Administrative Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer and the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services; and
(d)communication (September 11, 1998) from Ms. Anne Dubas, President, Local 79, Canadian Union of Public
Employees, forwarding a brief regarding the Business Case Review of the "Works Best Practices Program", a copy of
which is on file in the Clerk's Department.
The following persons appeared before the Budget Committee in connection with the foregoing matter:
-Mr. Peter Leiss, Vice-President, Toronto Civic Employees' Union, Local 416,
-Mr. John Murdock from the Water Division and the Toronto Civic Employees' Union
Local 416.
-Mr. Allister Reid from the Water Pollution Control Division and the Toronto Civic Employees' Union Local 416.
--------
(Joint report dated July 23, 1998 addressed to the
Budget Committee from the Chief Administrative Officer,
the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and
the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services)
Purpose:
To report on the review of the Business Case for the Works Best Practices Program (WBPP), currently underway in the
Water and Wastewater Services Division of Works and Emergency Services, and to seek funding in the amount of
$19,433,000.00 for continuation of WBPP in 1998.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
At its meeting of April 29, 1998, Toronto Council approved the 1998-2002 Capital Works Program, which includes
provision for continuing expenditure on the Works Best Practices Program (WBPP) in the Water and Wastewater Services
Division of Works and Emergency Services.
The Works Best Practices Program is a four and one-half year plan, with an estimated capital cost of $101,905,000.00. The
two major outcomes of this Program are the substantial replacement of obsolete and aging plant instrumentation, equipment
and control systems, and the modernization of work and management practices and procedures, enabled by new
information systems, in all areas of operations and maintenance. The operating cost reductions produced by WBPP
implementation in Water and Wastewater Services will increase through the implementation period to $37,076,000.00 per
year in 2002, the first full year following completion of the project and will continue at that level thereafter. WBPP is
presently on schedule with regard to the overall planned capital expenditure and the achievement of operating cost
reductions.
In approving the 1998-2002 Capital Works Program, Council withheld funding approval of expenditures pending a review
of the WBPP business case by the Chief Administrator's Office. Of the planned total WBPP cost of $101,905,000.00, prior
financing has been approved totalling $25,377,000.00 to complete Phase 1 activities.
Of the amount approved, the total spent and/or committed to date is $22,840,000.00 leaving an uncommitted balance of
$2,537,000.00, which is, however, earmarked for remaining Phase 1 planned activities.
Additional financing in the amount of $19,433,000.00 is now required for continuation of planned implementation work in
1998, with some expenditures extending into 1999 as major contracted plant detailed design work, under Phase 2 of the
Program. Details to the Costing Unit level are shown in Appendix 1.
The Treasurer has advised that funding can be made available from the Water Pollution Control Measures Reserve Fund
and the Water Supply Capital Financing Reserve.
The financial impact of implementing WBPP in the former Metro Water Supply and Water Pollution Control functions was
analyzed by the Finance Department in 1997. The results of that analysis indicated that the WBPP can be financed through
the water rate without adverse impact to the existing rate projections. The consequences of not completing WBPP are
significantly higher future water rates as a result of foregoing planned operating cost reductions estimated at
$37,076,000.00 per year.
It should be noted that this program will contribute significantly to resolution of the Year 2000 (Y2K) problem in Water
and Wastewater Services. The estimated twelve-to-fifteen million dollar cost of replacing aging, non-Y2K compliant
SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) equipment and systems in the water and wastewater treatment plants
and in the collection and transmission systems is already contained in the WBPP capital estimates. Further, all new
information systems and technologies deployed under WBPP will be certified Y2K compliant as per corporate standards,
avoiding the need to repair or replace a host of older, non-compliant systems.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1)Toronto Council endorse continuance of the Works Best Practices Program, described herein;
(2)funding in the amount of $19,433,000.00 ($3,063,000.00 in Water Supply
Appropriation WS026 and $16,370,000.00 in Water Pollution Control Appropriation WPC001) be approved from the
Water Supply Capital Financing Reserve and the Water Pollution Control Measures Reserve Fund;
(3)subject to recommendation No. (2) above authority be granted for an expenditure of $19,433,000.00, after the
Municipal Goods and Services Tax Rebate, to continue implementation of the Best Practices Program; and
(4)the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.
Council Reference/ Background/ History:
At its meeting of July 2 and 3, 1997, by adoption of Clause No. 3 of Report No. 13 of Financial Priorities, Metropolitan
Council endorsed continuance of the WBPP. The program had been previously established by Metropolitan Council on
September 25 and 26, 1996 through adoption of Clause No. 2 of Report No. 14 of the Environmental and Public Space
Committee with the objective of implementing the best practices in the utility industry in the areas of work management,
technology and organization, to maximize operating effectiveness and efficiency across the Department. The WBPP arose
through expanding the structure and scope of the previously existing Process Equipment Replacement and Strategic
Information Systems Plan (SISP) project for the former Metro Works Water Pollution Control Division (reference Clause
No. 1 of Report No. 15 of Environment and Public Space Committee, adopted by Metropolitan Council at its meeting of
September 27 and 28, 1995) to encompass all business functions of the former Metro Works Department.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
At its meeting of September 25 and 26, 1996, Metropolitan Council, by approval of Clause No. 2 of Report No. 14 of the
Environment and Public Space Committee, endorsed commencement of the Works Best Practices Program in the Works
Department. At its meeting of July 2-3, 1997, Council, by approval without amendment of Clause No. 3 of Report No. 13
of the Financial Priorities Committee, authorized expenditures to perform Phase 1 implementation of the Works Best
Practices Program (WBPP). In each of these instances, a presentation of the business case for WBPP, in the context of the
recommendations being requested at the time, was presented to the Committee. Further, the business case had been
reviewed and endorsed by the Metro Chief Administrative Officer, Commissioner of Finance, and Commissioner of
Corporate Services.
On May 26, 1998, the Chief Administrative Officer met with staff of the Water and Wastewater Division of Works and
Emergency Services, including the Project Manager for WBPP, to review key elements of the Works Best Practices
Program business case. In the light of previous business case reviews having been performed by senior Metro officials, and
because this Program is both broad in scope and diverse in nature, involving substantial equipment upgrades in seven major
water/wastewater operating facilities, the commissioning of a number of strategic information management systems, and
the redesign of operations/maintenance work and management practices, the review focused on three key perspectives.
The first perspective is the financial component of the Program, including costs over time, operating cost savings over time,
and the implication of the program on water and sewer user rates - related to this would be the impacts on overall service
delivery in terms of quality and effectiveness.
The second perspective is the implication on organization and staff, both bargaining unit and management, and the
relationship between WBPP and the City of Toronto Amalgamation processes.
The third perspective is the implementation methodology being used to govern the wide range of tasks and activities
involved in implementing the Program.
Financial Aspects.
The fundamental objective of the Works Best Practices Program is to ensure business operations continue to be performed
to degrees of efficiency and effectiveness that are consistent with modern practices and supporting technologies. One of the
first steps in the initiation of the Program was the establishment of a "competitiveness assessment". This exercise utilizes
an efficiency benchmarking technique which is essentially identical to those used by the multinational private operators in
developing operating contract proposals for major water and wastewater utilities. It is the results of this exercise, backed up
by similar conclusions produced in a totally independent, internal "simulated competition", that led to the establishment of
a thirty-seven million dollar per year operating cost reduction target for the Works Best Practices Program.
The total cost of the Program, to be implemented over a four and one-half year period, is stated to be $101,905,000.00. Of
the total cost figure, approximately $65,000,000.00 represents previously planned expenditures for the necessary ongoing
replacement and upgrading of existing equipment and control systems in water and wastewater plants and in the collection
and transmission systems (these facilities have a combined infrastructure value estimated at $7,500,000,000.00). It is in fact
the remaining investment component of approximately $37,000,000.00, aimed at new and improved operations and
maintenance work practice and organizational redesign, underlying technology development and process control
improvements, that generates the bulk of the $37,076,000.00 in annual operating cost reductions. The $65,000,000.00 has
been effectively "bundled" into the Best Practices budget in order to leverage opportunities for efficiencies through
operational improvements and to ensure those investments are coordinated within the broad standards and technology
development strategies of the core Best Practices initiative.
In 1997, the full WBPP costs and schedule of planned operating cost reductions were included by Metro Finance in Water
Rate Model calculations and it was determined that no rate increase would be required. The Program, even including the
bundled $65,000,000.00 component, is effectively self-funding in that the accumulated operating cost reductions generated
exceed the capital costs within the life of the Program implementation. As the table below shows by the year 2002, the
program breaks even and is producing savings of $37,076,000.00 per year. If the Program does not proceed to completion,
there will be an increasing effect on water rates.
The table below summarizes the business case figures. Capital costs are year-by-year, inflated to year of expenditure and
after the Municipal Goods and Services Tax Rebate. Operating savings are net, year-by-year, in constant 1997 dollars. FTE
reductions are approximate, year-by-year. The Program is presently on target to deliver the planned operating cost
reductions within the planned Program cost.
|
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
Totals |
1998 Capital Works
Program |
6,273 |
12,845 |
15,230 |
28,952 |
23,921 |
14,684 |
0 |
101,905 |
Net Operating Savings |
0 |
2,898 |
3,183 |
9,892 |
19,880 |
30,066 |
37,076 |
102,995 |
FTE Reductions (est) |
0 |
38 |
38 |
110 |
157 |
120 |
80 |
543 |
The effects of implementing Works Best Practices on service delivery and product quality are favourable. Present quality
levels for potable water production and wastewater effluent production will be maintained, with improved flexibility and
cost management relating to legislated or otherwise directed improvement strategies. Service levels will be maintained,
providing for better responsiveness and better access to more relevant and timely information. Other benefits include
improved asset management and long-range performance, increased facility/infrastructure lifetime, and opportunities for
improved receiving water quality.
As a result of delay in proceeding with implementation of certain works, the projected cash flow for the project has been
revised from the 1998 Capital Works Program submission as noted below.
|
Pre-1998 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
Total |
per 1998 Capital Works
Program |
19,118 |
15,230 |
28,952 |
23,921 |
14,684 |
0 |
101,905 |
Revised |
14,811 |
17,339 |
31,150 |
23,921 |
14,684 |
0 |
101,905 |
Appropriate amendments will be reflected in the 1999 Capital Works Program.
Staffing and Organization.
The findings of the competitiveness assessment, confirmed in the simulated competition, pointed to reductions in
operations and maintenance labour costs as the primary source of available cost savings. The "best practices" that have
been identified under this Program as most relevant to former Metro water and wastewater operations stress the following
as the most significant areas of opportunity:
(i)more efficiently planned, managed and executed work practices;
(ii)"total productive operations" (TPO), which focuses on maximizing the productive time of human resources; and,
(iii)workforce flexibility, which tackles the issue of separated skills and crafts and its associated inefficiencies.
WBPP therefore emphasizes a broad transition of the workforce, including management, in terms of the jobs people do, the
way people are organized, and the work practices they employ. This transition must be orchestrated in conjunction with the
replacement and upgrading of process control equipment and systems and the implementation of key computer systems
aimed at organizing and managing resources, automating tasks, and managing the performance of the business, its
resources and assets.
Activities under WBPP to-date have identified and confirmed a clear need to reduce on a phased basis the size of the
overall workforce needed to perform the work and business processes that characterize the present workload. This was
evidenced by the competitiveness assessment, and by work done under the Program to-date, particularly in business
re-engineering exercises. This should not be surprising, given the rapid pace of change in the industry over the past decade
at the global level and the lesser degree of organizational change that has taken place in North America. At the same time,
change of this magnitude, regardless of the underlying business and financial logic, cannot be instituted without
consideration for its impact on staff at all levels. Included under Works Best Practices are a range of work redesign
components, affecting the jobs, responsibilities and skills of front-line staff in operations, maintenance, and general labour
areas, as well as the change management skills at the supervisory level. Within that process, some job descriptions need to
be revised, and new ones created. WBPP incorporates costs to support staff transition. This includes funds to finance
voluntary exit packages and staff training, including training for staff needing new skills to perform new types of work and
training for staff who wish to leave, but who require certain skills to assist them in finding new jobs. Both these funding
mechanisms are financed out of accruing savings during the implementation period, and have already been netted out of the
planned cost reductions.
Senior staff in the areas of Finance, Human Resources and Corporate Services are to be involved in this process to assist in
policy areas and to ensure that developed policies are followed. In the area of Labour Relations specifically, senior staff
have been involved in this Program from the outset, and continue to play an active role in the process.
At this stage, C.U.P.E. Local 79 continues to support the Works Best Practices Program, and has for the past year
maintained an active role in the Program. Local 416 formally "stepped back" from active WBPP participation earlier this
year. At this point, formal discussions are under way at the senior level to develop an appropriate working relationship
aimed primarily at addressing areas of concern relating to the impact of WBPP on its members. It is a stated goal of the
Works Best Practices Program to achieve planned reductions in the workforce through attrition, voluntary exit packages,
and an active process of redeployment on a City-wide basis, with layoffs to be considered only on a last-resort basis.
Intensive discussions are planned to take place in August for purposes of arriving at a firm set of principles and protocols to
govern the implementation of WBPP.
With regard to the relative implications of WBPP and amalgamation, it is clear that this Program is actively performing
Phase 3 restructuring work, and will help provide a solid operational foundation for the emerging Works and Emergency
Services management structure. Appropriate linkages between the two activities are presently under development.
Implementation Methodology.
The third area of focus is the implementation methodology of the Program - the standards and procedures and methods
being applied to enable and achieve the planned results. This is a complex area, and it is evident that much expertise has
been applied to the WBPP methodology. The initial design phase utilized external consultants from a wide range of
disciplines. This was needed for a number of reasons: the volume of work to be done; the transitional nature of much of that
work; the need to apply techniques that are very current and very specific to water and wastewater operations and
management; the need for assistance in project management activities relating to several major disciplines including
engineering and process control technologies and practices, information systems design and development, and "total
productive operations" work practices redesign; and, importantly, the need to apply specially-skilled resources to the
Program on a full-time basis through the critical design stages. As the Program moves into its second phase of work this
year, new roles are planned for development in Works and Emergency Services to effect the transition of sustaining aspects
of the new operation into the hands of staff. The need for consulting support will reduce substantially as key
implementations are rolled out in operational work areas, in major process control systems and their networks of equipment
and devices, and in underlying information technology applications.
From a project management standpoint, the methodology being applied is well suited to the Program. There is a strong
Quality Control and Quality Assurance component, which is separated from the main project body to ensure objectivity.
There is a review and approval process for project deliverables which brings to bear the expertise of both consultants and
staff and also provides effective knowledge transfer to staff to maximize self-sufficiency in the future.
A benefits tracking program is under development, with the assistance of Finance staff, to capture and report direct WBPP
benefits in the areas of energy, chemicals, parts and materials, and savings in labor costs. This system will operate until
completion of the Program, and can be adapted to support continuous improvement initiatives on an ongoing basis.
The Performance Management component of WBPP is a computerized business tool which will be used for monitoring
business performance, for establishing improvement targets and for tracking the achievement of those targets. This
capability is in keeping with emerging corporate strategies for benchmarking and tracking of key business improvements.
Conclusion:
The Works Best Practices Program is an important strategic initiative. It emphasizes the establishment of a continuous
improvement business and work environment in a climate of fiscal restraint, public accountability and openness, and global
competition. The business case for WBPP is strong - the achievement of ongoing cost reductions in the range of
$37,076,000.00 per year for an investment of $101,950,000.00, a large part of which is an operational necessity to maintain
the operational viability of approximately $7,500,000,000.00 in infrastructure. The resulting payback ratio of 35 percent
represents a solid cost-benefit. WBPP effectively pays for itself within the lifetime of the project.
While the Program will have a significant impact on both management and bargaining unit staff, funding has been built in
for transition and training. Communications and staff involvement are firmly entrenched principles of the Program.
Corporate labour relations/human resources staff have been involved in our ongoing discussion with the Union and are
providing input with respect to transition and training initiatives. The project methodology is well-suited to the needs of
this large and complex undertaking. Performance management and benefits tracking are integral to the design of
technologies, practices and organization.
This review process concluded that the Works Best Practices Program Business Case is complete and appropriate. The
Commissioner of Finance and the Executive Director of Information Technology for the City of Toronto have reviewed the
Program and are in concurrence. It is recommended that funding for the Program be provided as set out in Appendix 1 to
this report.
Contact Names and Telephone Numbers:
William G. Crowther
Director, Management and Technical Services
Toronto Works and Emergency Services Department
Phone: (416) 392-8256
Fax: (416) 392-2974
E-Mail: william_g._crowther@metrodesk.metrotor.on.ca
Jim Coe
Manager, Works Best Practices Program
Toronto Works and Emergency Services Department
Phone: (416) 392-3141
Fax: (416) 392-8817
E-Mail: jim_coe@metrodesk.metrotor.on.ca
--------
Business Case Review of the "Works Best Practices Program"
Appendix 1: Capital Accounts
(in $000's, including GST after Rebate)
CWP001 - Works Best Practices Program, Water Pollution Control |
Total
Funding
Requirement |
Year of
Expenditure* |
|
1998 |
1999 |
Management, Planning and Design: |
|
|
S20508 |
Project Management |
218 |
218 |
|
S20509 |
Office/Track Support |
646 |
646 |
|
Operating Business Programs and Systems: |
|
|
S20002 |
Work Management System |
258 |
258 |
|
S20465 |
Practices Implementation |
130 |
130 |
|
S20466 |
Laboratory Information Management
System |
171 |
171 |
|
S20510 |
Performance & Operations Management
System |
201 |
201 |
|
S20511 |
Financial/Administrative Systems
Integration |
15 |
15 |
|
S20512 |
Workflow & Document Management
System |
47 |
47 |
|
S20477 |
Technology Infrastructure |
325 |
325 |
|
S20483 |
Industrial Waste Management System |
73 |
73 |
|
Process Control Systems Upgrade and Improvement |
|
|
S20467 |
Highland Creek Treatment Plant -
Detailed Design |
3,717 |
558 |
3,159 |
S20468 |
Main Treatment Plant - Detailed Design |
7,338 |
1,101 |
6,237 |
S20470 |
Humber Treatment Plant - Detailed
Design |
3,231 |
485 |
2,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total CWP001
|
16,370 |
4,228 |
12,142 |
CWS026 - Works Best Practices Program, Water Supply |
|
|
Management, Planning and Design: |
|
|
T20313 |
Project Management |
432 |
432 |
|
T20314 |
Office/Track Support |
246 |
246 |
|
T20315 |
Information Technology Architecture |
250 |
250
|
|
Operating Business Programs and Systems: |
|
|
T20317 |
Work Management System |
392 |
392 |
|
T20318 |
Practices Implementation |
150 |
150 |
|
T20319 |
Laboratory Information Management
System |
182 |
182 |
|
T20320 |
Performance & Operations Management
System |
200 |
200 |
|
T20321 |
Financial/Administrative Systems
Integration |
74 |
74 |
|
T20322 |
Workflow & Document Management
System |
100 |
100 |
|
Process Control Systems Upgrade and Improvement |
|
|
T20340 |
Distribution Optimization |
1,037 |
519 |
518 |
|
|
|
|
Total CWS026 |
3,063 |
2,545 |
518 |
Program Total |
19433 |
6773 |
12660 |
* The cash flow indicated in this table reflects that required for new work to be initiated in 1998 and for which funding is
now required. The cash flow for certain elements extends into 1999 because the contracts to be awarded in 1998 will not be
completed in 1998.
--------
(Communication dated August 5, 1998 addressed to the
Chair, Budget Committee from the
National Representative, Toronto Civic Employees' Union, C.U.P.E. Local 416)
Please be advised that the Toronto Civic Employees' Union, Local 416 would like to make a presentation to the Budget
Committee meeting which I understand is scheduled for September 15th, 1998.
We would like very much to be placed on the agenda in order that we may discuss the Works Best Practices program.
Should you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact either Brian Cochrane or myself at (416)
968-7721.
--------
(Supplementary joint report dated September 9, 1998 addressed to the
Budget Committee from the Chief Administrative Officer,
the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and
the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services)
Purpose:
To provide financial and informational updates to the report titled "Business Case Review of the Works Best Practices
Program", consideration of which was deferred by the Budget Committee at its meeting of July 28, 1998 (Item No. 14) to
its meeting of September 15, 1998. Recommendations contained in that report are reproduced in this report in their updated
form.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
Refer to the accompanying report, "Business Case Review of the Works Best Practices Program", to which this report is an
addendum. This section contains updates to that report.
Funding is sought herein in the revised amount of $1.908 million for continuation of Works Best Practices Program
(WBPP) in 1998, this has been reduced from $19.433 million in the original report due primarily to the revised scheduling
of planned expenditures as a result of delays. Funding already approved for 1998 plus this proposed amount will cover
planned work to the end of 1998. Future funding requests will be covered as part of the 1999 capital budget process.
Financing in the amount of $1.908 million is required for continuation of planned implementation work in the Water
Supply area to the end of 1998. One expenditure extends into 1999 as a contracted activity commencing in 1998 and
finishing during 1999. Details to the Costing Unit level are shown in Appendix 1. The revised cash flow analysis is
contained in this report.
Recommendations:
Refer to the accompanying report, "Business Case Review of the Works Best Practices Program", to which this report is an
addendum. This section restates and revises the "Recommendations" contained in that report.
It is recommended that:
(1)Toronto Council endorse continuance of the Works Best Practices Program, described herein, and with the additional
control and reporting methodologies;
(2)funding in the amount of $1.908 million (in Water Supply Appropriation WS026) be approved from the Water Supply
Capital Financing Reserve;
(3)subject to recommendation no. (2) above, authority be granted for an expenditure of $1.908 million after the Municipal
Goods and Services Tax Rebate, to continue implementation of the Best Practices Program;
(4)the costs associated with staff downsizing and retraining, along with computer hardware and software replacement, be
financed from the reduction in expenditures in the Works Best Practices Program. The annual cost avoidance will be
identified separately in the Water Supply Capital Financing Stabilization Reserve and the Water Pollution Control
Measures Reserve Fund; and
(5)the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.
Council Reference/ Background/ History:
Refer to the accompanying report, "Business Case Review of the Works Best Practices Program", to which this report is an
addendum.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
Refer to the accompanying report, "Business Case Review of the Works Best Practices Program", to which this report is an
addendum. This section contains updates to that report.
Revised Financial Aspects of Works Best Practices Program (WBPP)
Phase 1 of WBPP, now near completion, has included a wide range of activities which have set the foundation for full-scale
implementation of modernized process control systems and equipment, plus management practices designed to enable
long-term continuous improvement. This Phase 1 work has in some areas identified better solutions than originally
envisaged and in some cases higher costs than originally estimated, for example, completion of Preliminary Design for the
three major wastewater treatment plants has identified a wider need for process control components than was estimated in
1991. The total increased cost to implement the whole program is $8.477 million. This increase in the budget estimates, as
a result of the preliminary design and eight years of inflation, represents an increase of 8.3 percent over the original
estimates.
The selection and acquisition of a comprehensive "work management system" to improve asset and human resource
management across the Water and Wastewater business is designed to be compatible with the SAP systems now selected
for City finance and payroll.
Full documentation of these revised capital costs will be provided in the 1999 Capital Works Program submission later this
year. The revised cash flow projection is contained in this report. In order to address the year 2000 problem, we are
currently assessing the need to advance the installation of some process control equipment into 1999. Unless this
advancement is required to address Y2K then the revised cash flow is valid to the end of the project.
General Manager's Review of the Program
The WBPP is a 4½ year project that has a revised total program cost of $110.382 million. The program started in 1997 and
has received funding approval of $25.377 million to date. Based on the expenditures to date in 1998 we can only anticipate
spending, or committing, a further $1.908 million in the balance of 1998. The cash flow projections for the remaining years
in the program have been revisited and we do not anticipate revising them at this time unless to address Y2K issues.
Contained within the total program costs are expenditures of $65 million that were identified in the previous Metro Capital
Programs as ongoing replacement of existing equipment and control systems in the water and wastewater plants plus in the
collection and transmission system. In effect these normal replacement costs have been bundled into the WBPP capital
appropriation. Assuming these expenditures would have taken place regardless of the WBPP, then the remaining $45
million more appropriately represents the investment of new money to achieve the savings identified. These savings would
be more accurately described as future cost avoidance and therefore enable Council to maintain, or even lower, the water
rate which has historically risen gradually due to the normal inflation factors.
The projected reduction in annual operating costs upon full implementation of the WBPP is $36 million per year for the
Water and Wastewater Division. This would indicate that the program would pay for itself within the lifetime of the
project. The water rate charge per cubic metre could be expected to start declining in the year 2000, hit 3 percent reduction
in 2003 and keep falling at 3 percent for the next 3 years. Alternatively, the rate could remain constant and allow Council to
invest the additional revenue in new or enhanced programs. This clearly demonstrates that the WBPP is worth investing in.
To date 20 percent of the total program expenditures have been spent, which are predominately associated with process
control preliminary design, integration technologies and implementation of the work management system. In order to
control future expenditures and track the benefits of the complete program, we are proposing a staff secondment from the
corporation for at least the next three years and possibly to the end of the project. This position will report directly to the
General Manager and be responsible for implementing cost control measures and reporting mechanisms. We are currently
seeking applications for this secondment and will be looking for someone with a background in financial planning and cost
control technology.
Staffing and Organization
Refer to the accompanying report, "Business Case Review of the Works Best Practices Program", to which this report is an
addendum. This section contains updates to that report.
To date, a series of meetings have taken place between representatives of C.U.P.E. Local 416 and management of the
Works and Emergency Services Department. Corporate Human Resources and Labour Relations have actively participated
in these meetings and in the preparations leading up to them.
Management had placed on hold all new implementation activities relating to the roll out of WBPP work areas in the
operating facilities since June to allow these discussions to take place without the hindrance of ongoing implementation
issues.
In addition to discussing matters of an immediate nature, formal proposals from both parties have been presented for
consideration as a "framework" for joint administration of the Works Best Practices Program plus the broader context of all
Continuous Improvement initiatives in the Department. It is the stated intention of management that, while the targets for
operating cost reductions and associated reductions in the overall workforce, including both management and unionized
staff in approximately equal proportions, must be preserved as a commitment to the citizens and ratepayers of the City of
Toronto, every reasonable effort is to be made to ensure that the transition of the workforce is implemented in a fair and
equitable manner.
To this point, the position of Local 416 has been that job security is a mandatory component in any process they would
agree to participate in. In effect, there must be a "no layoff" clause in any agreement that they are party to. Management has
indicated its inability to guarantee there will be no layoffs because of inherent uncertainties around the degree of response
to offered early exit packages and the extent of employment available elsewhere in the City to surplus staff. Layoffs is the
stated "last resort".
C.U.P.E. Local 79 continues to actively support and participate in the process.
The use of specifically reserved funds for voluntary separation packages and training programs, as well as the exploration
of any opportunity for redeployment in the City, not solely within Works and Emergency Services, is part of the proposal
under WBPP. Within the program we have estimated $5.5 million for staff buy-outs, plus $1.5 million for
training/retraining. There is a need to clarify the fact that exit incentives under the WBPP are not part of the corporate
amalgamation budget but have been incorporated as part of the Division's total WBPP program costs. A new
recommendation dealing with this issue has been included as no. 4 in the revised recommendations.
Timing of the Project
The project is approximately four months behind schedule, due primarily to the delays associated with discussions around
staff impacts with Local 416. This delay was largely accommodated into the WBPP work plan. However, the capacity to
absorb further delays without seriously jeopardizing the Program schedule has, for all intents and purposes, been exhausted.
Further delay will be translated into late achievement of promised operating cost reductions.
The table below provides a revised summary of the business case taking into account the delays so far. Capital costs are
year-by-year, inflated to year of expenditure and after the Municipal Goods and Services Tax Rebate. Operating savings are
net, year-by-year, in constant 1997 dollars. FTE reductions are approximate, year-by-year, and occur by year end.
|
To End of
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
Totals |
*Preliminary 1999
Capital Works Program |
24,778 |
26,877 |
35,291 |
21,423 |
2,013 |
0 |
110,382 |
*Net Operating Cost
Reductions |
6,884 |
7,940 |
16,964 |
26,827 |
34,901 |
36,226 |
129,742 |
FTE Reductions (est)
during the year |
60 |
98 |
142 |
134 |
106 |
0 |
540 |
(* in $000's)
As a result of delays in proceeding with implementation of certain works, the projected cash flow for the project has been
revised from the 1998 Capital Works Program submission as noted below.
|
Pre-1998 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
Total |
*Per 1998 Capital
Works Program |
19,118 |
15,230 |
28,952 |
23,921 |
14,684 |
0 |
101,905 |
*Revised |
14,644 |
10,134 |
26,877 |
35,291 |
21,423 |
2,013 |
110,382 |
(*in $000's)
Appropriate amendments will be reflected in the 1999 Capital Works Program to be submitted later this year.
Conclusion:
The Works Best Practices Program is an important strategic initiative. It emphasizes the establishment of a continuous
improvement of business and work environment in a climate of fiscal restraint, public accountability, openness and global
competition.
The business case for WBPP is strong. While the current program has bundled normal ongoing upgrades and maintenance
costs of $65 million into the overall costs, the achievement of ongoing cost reductions in the range of $36 million per year
for an investment of $45 million of new money represents a solid cost-benefit.
The earlier report substantiated the need for the WBPP to continue and the new General Manager's review supports this
position and went on to address the cash flow and funding requirements. This supplemental report has now reduced the
funding approvals required in 1998 from $19.433 million to $1.908 million. Further, it is proposed that a senior financial
staff person be seconded to the General Manager's office to provide control and reporting functions.
While the Program will have a significant impact on both management and bargaining unit staff, funding has been built in
for transition and training. Communications and staff involvement are firmly entrenched principles of the Department.
Contact Names and Telephone Numbers:
Jim Coe
Manager, Works Best Practices Program
Toronto Works and Emergency Services Department
Phone: (416) 392-3141
Fax: (416) 392-8817
E-Mail: jim_coe@metrodesk.metrotor.on.ca
--------
Business Case Review of the "Works Best Practices Program"
APPENDIX 1: Capital Accounts
(in $000's, including GST after Rebate)
CWS026 - Works Best Practices Program, Water Supply |
Total |
1998 |
1999 |
Management, Planning and Design: |
|
|
T20313 |
Project Management |
151 |
151 |
|
T20314 |
Office/Track Support |
94 |
94 |
|
T20315 |
Information Technology Architecture |
52 |
52
|
|
Operating Business Programs and Systems: |
|
|
T20317 |
Work Management System |
274 |
274 |
|
T20319 |
Laboratory Information Management
System |
47 |
47 |
|
T20320 |
Performance & Operations Management
System |
100 |
100 |
|
T20321 |
CAWP (Financial/Administrative
Systems Integration) |
30 |
30 |
|
T20322 |
Workflow & Document Management
System |
49 |
49 |
|
T20323 |
Technical Infrastructure |
73 |
73 |
|
Process Control Systems Upgrade and Improvement |
|
|
T20340 |
Distribution Optimization Study |
1,038 |
144 |
894 |
|
|
|
|
Total CWS026 |
1,908 |
1,014 |
894
|
* The cash flow indicated in this table reflects that required for new work to be initiated in 1998 and for which funding is
now required. The cash flow for one element extends into 1999 because the contract to be awarded in 1998 will not be
completed in 1998.
--------
(Communication dated September 11, 1998, addressed to the
Chair and Members of the Budget Committee from the
President, Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 79)
This report reviews the Business Case for the Works Best Practices Program and seeks funding for its continuation in 1998.
Through this project, the operation of the Water and Waste Water Services Division will be redesigned. The goal is to
continue to provide public sector environmental services to taxpayers, while becoming more cost-effective.
CUPE Local 79 representatives have participated in the Best Practices Program because we are committed to ensuring that
Works and Emergency Services continues to offer the best possible services to the public and remains a public sector
utility.
The report identifies plans to reduce overall staffing levels during the period from 1996 to 2002. CUPE Local 79
representatives have been working to develop a fair and achievable program for the staff transition which is in keeping with
our Collective Agreements and City policies. Retraining and educational opportunities must be provided so that staff can
develop the skills needed to succeed. It is important to ensure that sufficient funding has been included in the budget for
transition and training. Improved retirement packages and exit incentive programs should be made available to all
employees on a voluntary basis. There may be opportunities to contract-in work from other areas outside of the new City.
CUPE Local 79 is opposed to the privatization of our water and waste water and solid waste assets. In 1996, a public
attitude survey was carried out with industry and the public--it found that two-thirds of those polled unequivocally wanted
water and waste water services to remain in the public sector.
Our resources are too valuable for us to give up. We urge the Budget Committee to support programs which ensure that
these assets remain in the public domain, delivered by public sector employees who are accountable to publicly elected
officials.