|  |  | 
				
					|  |  |  
					|  |  | City of Toronto Council and Committees |  
					|  |  | All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca. |  
					|  |  |   
        
                                       THE CITY OF TORONTO
                                        Clerk's Department
                          Minutes of the Economic Development Committee
                                          Meeting No. 7
                                                                        Friday, December 11, 1998.
               The Economic Development Committee met on Friday, December 11, 1998, in Committee
               Room A, 2nd Floor, City Hall, Toronto, commencing at 9:30 a.m.
               Members Present:
                              Councillor Brian Ashton, Chair
                              Councillor Mario Giansante, Vice-Chair
                              Councillor Sandra Bussin
                              Councillor Raymond Cho
                              Councillor Frank Faubert
                              Councillor Michael Feldman
                              Councillor Douglas Holyday
                              Councillor Norman Kelly
                              Councillor Joan King
                              Councillor Jane Pitfield
                              Councillor Mario Silva
               No declarations of interest pursuant to the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act
               were declared by Members of the Economic Development Committee.
               Confirmation of Minutes.
                       On motion by Councillor Holyday, the Minutes of the meeting of the
                       Economic Development Committee held on November 16, 1998 were
                       confirmed.
64.            Harmonization of User Fees.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (November 25, 1998) from
               the City Clerk forwarding to the Economic Development Committee the action of the
               User Fee Committee on November 24, 1998, and recommending:
               (1)     (a)    Policy Principles
                              -       Recreation programs are important municipal services which
                                      contribute significant personal, social, economic and
                                      environmental benefits which enhance the well-being of
                                      Toronto citizens, their neighbourhoods and the local
                                      economy;
                              -       the City of Toronto shall ensure all residents year-round
                                      accessibility to high quality community recreation and
                                      leisure programs regardless of their ability to pay;
                              -       the City of Toronto shall ensure equity and fairness to
                                      taxpayers and contribute to the long term vitality of public
                                      recreation services provided by the City and the voluntary
                                      and not-for-profit sectors;
                              -       the City of Toronto shall encourage maximum opportunity for
                                      the enjoyable, healthful, satisfying and creative use of
                                      leisure time;    
                       (b)    Policy Elements
                              -       Client and taxpayers at the forefront of pricing decisions; 
                              -       consistency City-wide;
                              -       quality service standards not influenced by user fees;
                              -       accessibility strategies;
                              -       price based on benefits to user, benefits to community and
                                      operating costs;
                              -       accountability;
                       (c)    Implementation Guidelines
                              -       Establish list of services which do not charge a user fee
                                      and are available universally;
                              -       where a user fee is to be charged, fees to be based on
                                      different levels of cost recovery (10% to over 100%);
                              -       harmonize January 1999, followed by stable price strategy to
                                      ensure future adjustments are gradual;
                              -       establish effective measures to provide access to low income
                                      individuals and high need communities;
                              -       monitor and adjust fees on an annual basis prior to the
                                      submission of the annual budget;
                              -       utilize a variety of effective user fee methods, including
                                      current technologies to enhance customer service (e.g.
                                      access  smart  card and improved registration system);
               (2)      WHEREAS recreational services in the City of Toronto are a key component
                       in providing a healthy City and contributing to the quality of life in
                       communities across Toronto;
                       AND WHEREAS Toronto should be committed to equal access to these services,
                       regardless of income, age or geographic location;
                       THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the User Fee Committee, after having now
                       completed the public consultation process, recommend the harmonization of
                       all user fees for recreational services by the City of Toronto effective
                       January 1, 1999;
                       AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED THAT the User Fee Committee recommends the
                       elimination of all user fees for drop in programs, subscriber programs and
                       basic instructional programs. ;
               (3)     that the surcharge for programs and activities for participants outside the
                       City of Toronto area be retained;
               (4)     that  high needs  communities be exempt from paying user fees for
                       specialized programs;
               (5)     that Recommendation No. (2) of the Scarborough Community Council be
                       adopted, viz:
                                an access policy be considered that would ensure
                              that low income families and individuals are not
                              penalized. ;
               (6)     that the Budget Committee be requested to consider Parks and Recreation
                       revenues being placed in general revenues and the Parks and Recreation
                       budget being considered outside the framework of revenues generated;
               (7)     that Toronto Community Council s position (November 12, 1998) that there be
                       no User Fees in the City of Toronto be reiterated; and
               (8)     that the mandate of the User Fee Committee be expanded to address the issue
                       of recreational  permits and a  similar comprehensive consultation process
                       as that undertaken for user fees for recreation programs.
               The Committee also had before it the following communications and reports:
               -       (December 10, 1998) from Ms. Anne Dubas, President, CUPE, Local 79,
                       opposing the introduction of user fees as it is felt that the principle of
                       universal access will be destroyed forever with the introduction of even
                       minimal user fees; and
               -       (December 10, 1998) from the City Clerk, North York Community Council,
                       reporting that North York Community Council, on December 10, 1998, referred
                       the matter of Parks and Recreation User Fees and the following motions to
                       the Chief Administrative Officer to establish a broad priority setting
                       exercise including user fees and all other fees so that Council can
                       collectively arrive at a decision on its priorities:
                       (1)    Councillor Filion moved that Community Councils be allocated a per
                              capita budget to set priorities on such areas as Parks and
                              Recreation user fees, snow removal and garbage pick-up;
                       (2)    Councillor King moved that:
                              (a)     the North York Community Council supports in principle that
                                      the harmonization of user fees for Parks and Recreation
                                      programs should be revenue neutral; and
                              (b)     the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and
                                      Tourism be requested to develop a clear policy for the
                                      subsidization of programs;
                       (3)    Councillor Shiner moved that the North York Community Council
                              supports in principle the charging of user fees for Parks and
                              Recreation programs, except for public skating and outdoor swimming
                              pools, and that the user fee policy also facilitate the needs of
                              those who cannot afford such programs.
                       On motion by Councillor King, the Committee referred this matter to
                       the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism and
                       requested him to report further to the Committee s next meeting on
                       January 15, 1999.
                       (Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism; c.c.:
                       Interested Persons - December 17, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(d))
65.            Fashion Industry Liaison Committee - Membership Expansion.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (November 6, 1998) from
               the City Clerk forwarding to the Economic Development Committee the action taken
               by City Council on October 28, 29 and 30, 1998 (Clause No. 3 of Report No. 3 of
               the Economic Development Committee, headed  Fashion Industry Liaison Committee
               Membership and 1997/1998 Activities ), and advising that Council amended the
               Clause by adding the following:
                        It is further recommended that:
                       (1)    Councillor Kelly be appointed to the Fashion Industry Liaison
                              Committee as the representative of the Economic Development
                              Committee; and
                       (2)    the following motions be referred to the Economic Development
                              Committee for consideration:
                                      Moved by Councillor Brown:
                                      `It is further recommended that a representative of
                                      the Etobicoke garment industry be added to the
                                      membership of the Fashion Industry Liaison
                                      Committee. 
                                      Moved by Councillor Moscoe:
                                      `It is further recommended that a representative of
                                      the North York garment district be added to the
                                      membership of the Fashion Industry Liaison
                                      Committee.   
                       On motion by Councillor Giansante, the Committee referred the two
                       motions from Councillors Brown and Moscoe referred by City Council
                       to the Economic Development Committee for consideration, to the
                       Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism with a
                       request that he report thereon to the Committee.
                       (Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism; c.c.: 
                       Councillor Brown; Councillor Moscoe - December 17, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(f))
66.            Election of Chairman and Vice-Chairman
               North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (November 24, 1998) from
               the City Clerk forwarding the action of the Board of Directors of the North York
               Performing Arts Centre on November 23, 1998, and recommending the appointment of
               the following persons to the positions of Chairman and Vice-Chairman:
                       Mr. James G. McGuffin - Chairman; and
                       Mr. Symon Zucker - Vice-Chairman.
                       On motion by Councillor King, the Committee recommended to City
                       Council that James G. McGuffin be appointed Chair of the North York
                       Performing Arts Centre Corporation and Symon Zucker be appointed
                       Vice-Chair.
                                   (Report No. 7, Clause No. 2)
67.            Technical Improvements to the Jane Mallett Theatre.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (November 17, 1998) from
               the Chair, The Board of Management of the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts,
               requesting that the Economic Development Committee expedite Council approval for
               technical improvements to the Jane Mallett Theatre by providing six motorised
               system pipes to enable the use of on-stage lighting and scenery hanging, if in
               fact it deems that Council approval is necessary.
                       On motion by Councillor Silva, the Committee recommended to City
                       Council that approval be expedited for technical improvements to
                       the Jane Mallett Theatre by providing six motorised system pipes to
                       enable the use of on-stage lighting and scenery hanging.
                                   (Report No. 7, Clause No. 3)
68.            Arts and Culture Report for the Period January 1 to September 30, 1998.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (November 25, 1998) from
               the President, Toronto Arts Council, providing an information report to the
               Economic Development Committee on a quarterly basis on its revenues and
               expenditures for each of its programs for the previous quarter, and recommending
               that this report be received for information.
                       On motion by Councillor Silva, the Committee received the Arts and
                       Culture Grants Report for the period January 1 to September 30,
                       1998 from the Toronto Arts Council for information.
                       (Ms. Anne Collins, President, Toronto Arts Council; c.c.:
                       Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism -
                       December 18, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(g))
69.            Toronto Arts Council s 1997 Annual Report.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (November 25, 1998) from
               the President, Toronto Arts Council, providing an annual report to the Economic
               Development Committee on its performance for the preceding calendar year and
               recommending that this report be received for information.
                       On motion by Councillor Silva, the Committee received the Toronto
                       Arts Council s 1997 Annual Report for information.
                       (Ms. Anne Collins, President, Toronto Arts Council; c.c.:
                       Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism -
                       December 18, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(h))
70.            Pearson International Airport Development Plan.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a communication (November 16,
               1998) from the Senior Vice-President, Corporate Affairs and Government Relations,
               Air Canada, addressed to Councillor Rob Davis, advising that Air Canada does not
               support the redevelopment plan in its present form and recommending that the
               Greater Toronto Airport Authority (GTAA) develop a cost-effective development plan
               for Pearson that promotes growth, creates jobs in the Greater Toronto Area, keeps
               air travel affordable for everyone, and establishes Pearson International Airport
               as a major North American hub.
               The Committee also had before it a communication dated January 20, 1998, addressed
               to Mr. R. Lamar Durrett, President and Chief Executive Officer, Air Canada Centre
               271, from Mr. Louis A. Turpen, President and Chief Executive Officer, Greater
               Toronto Airports Authority, forwarding comments regarding the  scope and cost  of
               the Airport Development Program (ADP).
                       On motion by Councillor Silva, the Committee referred this
                       communication to the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture
                       and Tourism and requested him to report thereon to the Committee.
               (Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism; c.c.: Interested
               Persons - December 17, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(i))
71.            Proposed Use of Street Ad Devices on Department Administered Properties.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (December 2, 1998) from
               the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism replying to a
               communication dated August 25, 1998, from Mr. Sid Catalano, Director of
               Legislation, Pattison Outdoor Signs, addressed to the North York Community Council
               regarding the placement of street ad devices on Department administered
               properties, and recommending that:
               (1)     this report be received for information and referred to the User Fee
                       Committee for submission of future reports on the issue;
               (2)     a project team be established to examine issues related to outdoor
                       advertising at City parks and recreation facilities, assess several
                       proposals related to outdoor advertising in the context of developing
                       future policies, and prepare a report on proposed policies and processes
                       related to outdoor advertising;
               (3)     this report be submitted to the User Fee Committee for information; and
               (4)     the appropriate City officials take the necessary action to give effect
                       thereto.
                       On motion by Councillor King, the Committee adopted the report
                       (December 2, 1998) from the Commissioner of Economic Development,
                       Culture and Tourism and in so doing:
                       (1)    received the report for information; and
                       (2)    forwarded a copy to the User Fee Committee for information.
                       On motion by Councillor Giansante, the Committee requested that a
                       project team be established to examine issues related to outdoor
                       advertising at City parks and recreation facilities, assess several
                       proposals related to outdoor advertising in the context of
                       developing future policies, and that the Commissioner of Economic
                       Development, Culture and Tourism report on proposed policies and
                       processes related to outdoor advertising.
                       (Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism; User
                       Fee Committee; c.c.: Mr. Sid Catalano, Director of Legislation,
                       Pattison Outdoor Signs - December 17, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(j))
72.            Canada Blooms - The Toronto Flower and Garden Show.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (November 20, 1998) from
               the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism providing an update
               as to participation and assistance to the 1999 Canada Blooms - The Toronto Flower
               and Garden Show and recommending that this report be received for information.
                       On motion by Councillor Silva, the Committee received this report
                       for information.
               (Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism - December 17, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(k))
73.            Funding Strategy for the 1999 Caribana Festival.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (November 26, 1998) from
               the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism reporting on a
               funding strategy for the Caribbean Culture Committee (CCC) that allows the
               planning for the 1999 Caribana Festival to proceed in an orderly way, and
               recommending that:
               (1)     the grant to the Caribana Festival be paid on a monthly installment basis,
                       beginning in January, 1999, based on the level of the grant made in 1998
                       ($353,500.00) until such time as the 1999 grant amount has been approved by
                       Council and subject to the receipt of audited statements for the 1997-98
                       fiscal year and the authorization of the Caribana Festival Support Group
                       (CFSG);
               (2)     the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer make provision for the monthly
                       payments for the Caribana Festival in the interim appropriation; and
               (3)     the appropriate City Officials be authorized and directed to take the
                       necessary action to give effect thereto.
                       On motion by Councillor Feldman, the Committee recommended to City
                       Council the adoption of the report (November 26, 1998) from the
                       Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism.
                                   (Report No. 7, Clause No. 4)
74.            1999-2003Capital Works Program.
               The Economic Development Committee received a submission from the Commissioner of
               Finance and Treasurer for the following sections of the 1999-2003 Capital Works
               Program:
               -       Economic Development;
               -       Arts, Culture and Heritage;
               -       Parks and Recreation;
               -       Toronto Zoo;
               -       Exhibition Place;
               -       Toronto Economic Development Corporation; and
               -       Toronto Harbour Commission.
               The Committee also had before it the following reports and communications:
               -        (November 9, 1998) from the Chief Administrative Officer respecting the
                       1999-2003 Capital Works Programs, providing an overview of the Capital
                       Budget process; and summarizing the various issues and challenges currently
                       faced by the City;
               -       (November 11, 1998) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                       proposing a preliminary capital financing plan for the 1999-2003 Capital
                       Works Program;
               -       (December 2, 1998) from Ms. Ella Jackson, Black Creek Business Area
                       Association, requesting allocation of funding to the Industrial Area
                       Revitalization Program;
               -       (November 27, 1998) from Councillor Nunziata, York-Humber, requesting
                       allocation of funding for the revitalization of the Black Creek Business
                       Area;
               -       (December 7, 1998) from Mr. Tom Wilson, York Association of Industry &
                       Commerce, expressing support for continuing the Industrial Area
                       Revitalization Program;
               -       (undated) from Ms. Joan Doiron, Co-Chair, Toronto Pedestrian Committee,
                       forwarding a submission and the following recommendations from the Economic
                       Development Committee:
                        (1)   That Toronto Economic Development Committee (TEDC) work with the
                              Toronto Pedestrian Committee, local BIAs, and other business groups
                              to ensure the safety and enjoyment of pedestrians by developing retail-
                               and pedestrian-friendly streets throughout the City of Toronto.
                        (2)   That TEDC immediately establish a small working group with the
                              Toronto Pedestrian Committee (TPC) to accomplish this with the help
                              of appropriate staff.
                        (3)   (a)     That TEDC request its staff, in conjunction with the TPC
                                      staff, to prepare a report on the importance of
                                      pedestrianisation to the economic development of Toronto
                                      before March 1999.  This report should draw upon the Moving
                                      the Economy Conference (its Action Plan and International
                                      Inventory of Success Stories) and the work of the Green
                                      Tourism Association.
                              (b)     That this report form the basis of a vigorous City Council
                                      policy on pedestrianisation as a tool for Toronto s economic 
                                      growth so that Councillors may help Toronto become a world
                                      leader in this field. ;
               -       (December 9, 1998) from Councillor McConnell requesting the Committee s
                       support for prioritizing the St. James Town Community Centre; and
               -       (December 10, 1998) from Ms. Evelyn Garratt requesting the Committee s
                       support for prioritizing the St. James Town Community Centre.
                       The following persons appeared before the Economic Development Committee in
                       connection with the foregoing matter:
                       St. James Town Community Centre:
                       -      S/Insp. Bill Blair, Metro Police, 51 Division;
                       -      Ms. Pat Cepin;
                       -      Ms. Precy Betran;
                       -      Ms. Carla Rubio, Silayan Filipino Community Centre;
                       -      Mr. Bill Graham, M.P., Toronto Centre-Rosedale, Ontario;
                       -      Ms. Evelyn Garratt;
                       B.I.A. Cost Sharing:
                       -      Mr. Alex Ling, Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas 
                              (TABIA);
                       Transportation and Pedestrianisation:
                       -      Ms. Joan Doiron, Co-Chair, Toronto Pedestrian Committee;
                       -      Dr. Lucie Maillette, Skills Development Programme for Sustainable
                              Transportation;
                       Black Creek Business Area Association:
                       -      Mr. Lorne Berg, Black Creek Business Area Association;
                       Kennedy Road B.I.A.:
                       -      Mr. Lionel Miskin, General Manager, Shanemark Management &
                              Investments Inc.; and
                       West Junction B.I.A. Facade Program:
                       -      Mr. Henry Calderon, Project Manager, West Toronto Junction Team.
                       On motion by Councillor Silva, the Committee made the following
                       recommendations to the Budget Committee with respect to the 1999-
                       2003 Capital Works Program:
                       (1)    that City Council deem that physical improvements
                              within the City s Business Improvement Areas (BIAs)
                              are in the City s best interests in developing its
                              economic, cultural and tourism objectives;
                       (2)    that City Council support the former City of Toronto
                              Council s practice of cost-shared capital funding for
                              improving the City s commercial streets within BIAs for
                              special streetscape improvements on a 50:50 basis;
                       (3)    that City Council increase the Chief Administrative
                              Officer s 1999 funding recommendations for BIAs capital
                              cost-shared projects by $196,850.00 (net) in the Economic
                              Development, Culture and Tourism Department s Capital
                              Budget;
                       (4)    that all public proposals and policies to be considered by
                              City Council within the BIAs be reviewed by the local BIAs
                              and/or the Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas
                              (TABIA) so as to provide community input on such proposals
                              and policies; and
                       (5)    that TABIA be included in the development of any future
                              cost-shared program proposals with other levels of
                              Government for improving the streetscape within BIAs.
                       On motion by Councillor Pitfield, the Committee recommended:
                       (1)    that $50,000.00 be approved for environmental testing and
                              preliminary design work for the St. James Town Community
                              Centre and that this amount be reimbursed fully from the
                              Section 37 funding source;
                       (2)    that $350,000.00 for design fees for the St. James Town
                              Community Centre be approved and that this money be spent
                              when Section 37 funding has been received; and
                       (3)    that the $270,000.00 funding for industrial and
                              commercial revitalization areas be reinstated in the
                              1999 Capital Budget for economic development and
                              that the Commissioner of Economic Development,
                              Culture and Tourism report directly to the Budget
                              Committee on the implications and benefits of this
                              reinstatement.
                       On motion by Councillor Davis, the Committee amended the foregoing
                       motion of Councillor Pitfield by adding:
                               and that $150,000.00 of this funding be designated for the
                              Black Creek Business Revitalization Program. 
               On motion by Councillor Silva, the Committee requested the
               Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism to give a
               comprehensive presentation to a future meeting of the Economic
               Development Committee on the role of BIAs and their programs.
               (Budget Committee; Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism; 
               c.c.: Interested Persons - December 14, 1998)
                                   (Report No. 7, Clause 5(a))
               Councillor Giansante assumed the Chair.
75.            Sulphur in Fuels - Toronto s Fuels Purchase Program.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (November 16, 1998) from
               the City Clerk advising the Economic Development Committee that the Corporate
               Services Committee on November 9, 1998:
               (1)     submitted the communication (October 19, 1998) from the City Clerk
                       respecting Sulphur in Fuels to the Strategic Policies and Priorities
                       Committee, without recommendation; and
               (2)     forwarded a copy of the aforementioned communication to the Economic
                       Development Committee for consideration and report thereon to the Strategic
                       Policies and Priorities Committee.
               The Committee also had before it a submission from the Canadian Petroleum Products
               Institute (CPP), titled  Sulphur in Gasoline .
               Mr. T.R. (Bob) Clapp, Vice President, Ontario Division, Canadian Petroleum
               Products Institute, appeared before the Committee in connection with the foregoing
               matter.
                       On motion by Councillor King, the Committee:
                       (1)    recommended the adoption of the joint report (October 9,
                              1998) from the Commissioner of Corporate Services, the
                              Medical Officer of Health and the Director, Fleet Management
                              Services; and
                       (2)    forwarded its action in this respect to the Strategic
                              Policies and Priorities Committee for its December 15, 1998
                              meeting.
                       The following motion was voted on and lost on a tie:
                              On motion by Councillor Ashton:
                                       That the report (October 9, 1998) be received. 
                       The following motion was ruled out of order by the Chair:
                              On motion by Councillor Ashton:
                                       That the issue of fuel standards be referred back
                                      to the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture
                                      and Tourism with a request that he report to the
                                      Committee on fuel standards and its implication in
                                      the petroleum industry; 
               (Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee - December 14, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(c))
               The Economic Development Committee recessed at 12:37 p.m.
               The Economic Development Committee reconvened at 2:00 p.m.
               Members Present:
                              Councillor Brian Ashton, Chair
                              Councillor Mario Giansante, Vice-Chair
                              Councillor Raymond Cho
                              Councillor Robert Davis
                              Councillor Frank Faubert
                              Councillor Michael Feldman
                              Councillor Douglas Holyday
                              Councillor Norman Kelly
                              Councillor Joan King
76.            Transfer of Artifacts at Coronation Park.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (October 23, 1998) from
               the Managing Director, Toronto Historical Board, seeking Council approval for the
               transfer of the artifacts at Coronation Park to suitable museum homes and
               recommending that:
               (1)     The Lancaster Bomber be offered on loan to the Toronto Aerospace Museum
                       (TAM), within a negotiated museum loan agreement process, which includes
                       (but is not limited by) the following provisions:
                       (a)    that the TAM remove the bomber from Coronation Park in coordination
                              with Heritage Toronto and City staff, within the framework of a
                              professionally prepared removal plan produced by the TAM and
                              approved by the Heritage Toronto conservator;
                       (b)    that the TAM be allowed to restore the bomber, within the framework
                              of a professionally prepared restoration plan produced by the TAM
                              (in consultation with the Canadian Conservation Institute) and
                              approved by the Heritage Toronto conservator;
                       (c)    that the TAM house and display the bomber indoors within its
                              Downsview premises;
                       (d)    that the City be able to inspect the bomber on forty-eight hours 
                              notice during normal business hours;
                       (e)    that the City affirm that it is its intention to leave the bomber
                              at the TAM so long as the museum fulfils the conditions of the loan
                              agreement; and
                       (f)    that an appropriate time frame be determined and an agreement drawn
                              up in a form satisfactory to the Managing Director, Heritage
                              Toronto, and to the City Solicitor; and
               (2)     that should negotiations with the TAM fail, then the bomber be offered on
                       loan, pending successful negotiations, to the Comox Air Force Museum at CFB
                       Comox in Lazo, British Columbia;
               (3)     that the Sherman Tank and 25-Pounder Howitzer be offered as donations to
                       the Canadian War Museum (CWM) in Ottawa, with the restriction that the CWM,
                       should it decide to deaccession either object, keep the artifact in the
                       public domain by offering it for donation to the City of Toronto in the
                       first instance, then to an appropriate Canadian museum;
               (4)     that should the CWM decide against accepting either artifact, then the Tank
                       be offered to Niagara National Historic Sites in Niagara-on-the-Lake, and
                       the 25-Pounder to the Canadian Military Heritage Museum in Brantford, with
                       the restriction that should either museum decide to deaccession the object
                       it obtained from the City, it shall keep it in the public domain by
                       offering it for donation to the City of Toronto in the first instance, then
                       to an appropriate Canadian museum;
               (5)     that the Bofors Anti-Aircraft Gun be offered as a donation to the Naval
                       Museum of Manitoba (NMM) in Winnipeg, with the restriction that the NMM,
                       should it decide to deaccession the Gun, keep it in the public domain by
                       offering it to the City of Toronto in the first instance, then to an
                       appropriate Canadian museum;
               (6)     that should the NMM decide against accepting the Bofors, then it be offered
                       to the RCAF Memorial Museum in Trenton, with the restriction that should
                       that museum decide to deaccession the object it will keep it in the public
                       domain by offering it for donation to the City of Toronto in the first
                       instance, then to an appropriate Canadian museum; and
               (7)     that Heritage Toronto be authorized to reopen the competition for the
                       American Anti-Aircraft Gun.
               The Committee also had before it the following material;
               -       communication (December 7, 1998) from Mr. Allan A. Rubin, President,
                       Canadian Air Land Sea Museum, on behalf of Comox Air Force Museum.  (Bound
                       copy of full submission was forwarded to each member of the Committee and
                       is on file in the office of the City Clerk.);
               -       communication (December 10, 1998) from Councillor Pantalone supporting the
                       relocation of the Lancaster Bomber to the Toronto Aerospace Museum ;
               -       communication (December 11, 1998) from Mr. Bill Dickinson, Toronto Region
                       Vice-President, Air Force Association of Canada, endorsing the
                       recommendations of the Toronto Historical Board for the transfer of the
                       Lancaster Bomber to the Toronto Aerospace Museum;
               -       brochure, titled  Welcome to the New Toronto Aerospace Museum ;
               -       booklet, titled  Canada Remembers ; and
               -       magazine, titled  Airforce .
               The following persons appeared before the Committee in connection with the
               foregoing matter:
               -       Mr. Allan A. Rubin, President, Canadian Air Land Sea Museum, obo Comox Air
                       Force Museum; and
               -       Mr. Ron Wylie, Curator, Toronto Aerospace Museum.
                       On motion by Councillor King, the Committee recommended to City
                       Council the adoption of the report (October 23, 1998) from the
                       Managing Director, Toronto Historical Board.
               The foregoing motion was amended:
                       On motion by Councillor Feldman:
                               Councillor King s motion be amended by deleting
                              Recommendation No. (2) of the report (October 23 ,1998). 
                                   (Report No. 7, Clause No. 1)
77.            Turf Management Practices by Former Municipalities and Pesticide User Information.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (December 2, 1998) from
               the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism forwarding
               information concerning the turf management practices by the former municipal Parks
               and Recreation Departments and their records of pesticide usage; and recommending:
               (1)     implementation of an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program for all City
                       of Toronto Departments, Agencies, Boards and Commissions that provides for
                       safe management of pests and reduces reliance on pesticides;
               (2)     development of standard procedures in distinct program areas in order to
                       monitor the effectiveness of the IPM Program and to provide regular
                       reports;
               (3)     a copy of this report be sent to the Works and Utilities Committee and the
                       Board of Health;
               (4)     participation on the Pesticide Subcommittee and the Toronto Inter-
                       Departmental Environment Team;
               (5)     that staff report back to the Economic Development Committee once targets
                       are set and standards devised; and
               (6)     the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary action
                       to give effect thereto.
               The Committee also had before it the following materials:
               -       communication (November 26, 1998) from the Chair, Environmental Task Force,
                       recommending that the Economic Development Committee endorse the
                       recommendations of the Board of Health contained in Clause No. 1 of Report
                       No. 13 of the Board of Health, headed  Phasing Out Pesticide Use in the
                       City of Toronto , which Council on November 25, 26 and 27, 1998,
                       resubmitted to its next meeting on December 16, 1998;
               -       Clause No. 1 of Report No. 13 of the Board of Health, headed  Phasing Out
                       Pesticide Use in the City of Toronto , which was deferred by City Council
                       on November 25, 26 and 27, 1998, to the next regular meeting of City
                       Council to be held on December 16, 1998; pending the recommendation of the
                       Works and Utilities Committee and the Economic Development Committee in
                       this regard;
               -       report (December 7, 1998) from the Chair, Environmental Task Force
                       recommending adoption of the following recommendations of the Works and
                       Utilities Committee at their meeting on December 2, 1998:
                       The Works and Utilities Committee:
                       (A)    recommends the adoption of the recommendations of the Board of
                              Health, embodied in Clause No. 1 of Report No. 13 of The Board of
                              Health, entitled  Phasing Out Pesticide Use in the City of
                              Toronto , subject to:
                              (1)     striking out Recommendation No. (1) of the Board of Health
                                      and Recommendation No. (1) of the Medical Officer of Health,
                                      and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
                                       (1)   That City Council adopt in principle the banning of
                                             pesticides on all City property; and further that:
                                             (a)     the Chief Administrative Officer and the
                                                     Medical Officer of Health, in coordination
                                                     with the departments affected, report back to
                                                     the Works and Utilities Committee and the
                                                     Board of Health no later than February 1999
                                                     on a reasonable phase-in of the proposed ban
                                                     that would aim to achieve an end to applying
                                                     pesticides on public green space in 1999,
                                                     except in emergency situations or other
                                                     exceptions to be outlined in the report by
                                                     the Chief Administrative Officer and the
                                                     Medical Officer of Health, such report to
                                                     include a financial impact and risk
                                                     assessment and the final timetable for the
                                                     setting of goals and targets for the
                                                     reduction of pesticides in time for the 1999
                                                     season;
                                             (b)     staff ensure that the phased-in ban include
                                                     an improved and modified lawn care program to
                                                     balance the effect of eliminating pesticides;
                                                     and
                                             (c)     the proposed Pesticide Sub-Committee, as
                                                     amended by Recommendation No. (2) of the
                                                     Board of Health, be convened to assist the
                                                     Chief Administrative Officer and the Medical
                                                     Officer in Health in the development of their
                                                     report; and
                                      (2)    amending Recommendation No. (3) of the Board of
                                             Health to provide that funding for the proposed
                                             public education program be included for
                                             consideration in the 1999 budget; and
                              (B)     further recommends that:
                                      (1)    the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services be
                                             requested to develop a pilot project to engage the
                                             use of various beneficial use products arising from
                                             the biosolids management initiatives from the Main
                                             Treatment Plant;
                                      (2)    the appropriate staff be requested to submit a
                                             report to the appropriate committee on a program
                                             similar to the Plant Health Care Program of the City
                                             of Waterloo that involves horticultural practices to
                                             lead to the near elimination of pesticide use on
                                             City of Toronto properties; and
                                      (3)    the submission by Councillor Shiner, consisting of a
                                             report dated November 1996 which was before the
                                             former City of North York Environment Committee,
                                             entitled  Pesticide Use/Alternatives to Pesticides -
                                             1996", and detailed recommendations with respect
                                             thereto, be referred to the Chief Administrative
                                             Officer, the Toronto Inter-Departmental Environment
                                             Team, the Medical Officer of Health and any other
                                             staff reviewing pesticide use, to review in context
                                             with the final reports;
               -       communication (undated) from Mr. Douglas W. Byrant, CanTox Inc.,
                       Consultants in Toxicology, forwarding comments on  Pesticides: A Public
                       Health Perspective: Technical Report  (Toronto Public Health, Environmental
                       Protection Office, October 30, 1998);
               -       communication (December 11, 1998) from Mr. Tony DiGiovanni, Executive
                       Director, Landscape Ontario, recommending:
                       -      a reasoned logical approach to pesticide reduction but no ban;
                       -      Landscape Ontario be involved in any public education campaign;
                       -      the technical report not be used because it misrepresents the
                              industry and is a biased one-sided document;
                       -      we put energy and focus into finding alternatives, research and
                              education, i.e. biotechnology, IPM education, etc.; and
                       -      a full impact study should be done before proceeding with the
                              motion;
               -       communication (December 11, 1998) from Ms. Wendy Rose, Executive Director,
                       Urban Pest Management Council of Canada, forwarding comments regarding the
                       Board of Health report (October 30, 1998) regarding the phasing out of
                       pesticide use in the City of Toronto.
               Mr. Doug McDonald, Operations Co-ordinator, Parks and Recreation, gave an overhead
               presentation to the Economic Development Committee on the foregoing matter.
               The following persons appeared before the Economic Development Committee in
               connection with the foregoing matter:
               -       Mr. Douglas Bryant, Senior Scientist, CanTox;
               -       Mr. Velden Sorensen, Director of Development, Bayer Inc.;
               -       Ms. Wendy Rose, Executive Director, Urban Pest Management Council of
                       Canada;
               -       Mr. Tony DiGiovanni, Executive Director, Landscape Ontario;
               -       Mr. Daniel Passmore;
               -       Mr. Gerald Boot, President, Boots Landscape and Maintenance; and
               -       Ms. Janet May, Toronto Environmental Alliance.
                       On motion by Councillor King, the Committee recommended to City
                       Council that consideration of Clause 1 of the Board of Health
                       Report No. 13, headed  Phasing Out Pesticide Use in the City of
                       Toronto , be deferred pending a report from the Commissioner of
                       Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, in consultation with the
                       Medical Officer of Health, on the development of an Integrated Pest
                       Management Program for submission to the March 25, 1999 meeting of
                       the Economic Development Committee.
                       On motion by Councillor Kelly, the Committee amended the foregoing
                       motion of Councillor King to include:
                               That the Urban Pest Management Council and Landscape
                              Ontario be included in the consultation process to develop
                              an Integrated Pest Management Program. 
                       (City Council - December 14, 1998; Commissioner of Economic
                       Development, Culture and Tourism; c.c.: Medical Officer of Health;
                       Ms. Wendy Rose, Executive Director, Urban Pest Management Council
                       of Canada; Mr. Tony DiGiovanni, Executive Director, Landscape
                       Ontario; Interested Persons - December 22, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(e))
78.            Film Permit Issuance - Review of Practices, Procedures, Policies and By-laws.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (September 8, 1998) from
               the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism reporting on an
               overview of the importance of the film industry to the economy of the City,
               outlining one unified By-law and comprehensive guidelines to regulate the use of
               public property for location filming and recommending that:
               (1)     the Economic Development Committee endorse the attached Guidelines for
                       Filming in the City of Toronto and City of Toronto Code of Conduct for Cast
                       and Crew.  (Appendices 1 and 2);
               (2)     film location permitting for Toronto be coordinated by the Toronto Film and
                       Television Office in Economic Development with decision making remaining
                       decentralized;
               (3)     the Economic Development Committee endorse the attached By-law (Appendix 3)
                       and recommend that the City Solicitor be authorized to introduce the
                       necessary Bill in Council to give effect thereto; and
               (4)     the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism report back
                       as necessary on future developments in the film and television sector
                       including any operational requirements.
               The Committee also had before it a report (November 13, 1998) from the
               Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism providing revised
               filming guidelines.
                       On motion by Councillor Feldman, the Committee deferred
                       consideration of this matter and requested the Commissioner of
                       Economic Development, Culture and Tourism to report on the
                       following suggested motions of Councillor Flint for consideration
                       at the Committee s next meeting on January 15, 1999:
                        (1)   That the report (September 8, 1998) from the Commissioner of
                              Economic Development, Culture and Tourism as amended by his
                              further report (November 13, 1998) be amended by adding to
                              Recommendation (1) a directive that affected Ward
                              Councillor(s) be notified of each film location application
                              prior to any permit being issued;
                        (2)   that the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and
                              Tourism be requested to report back to the Committee on the
                              issue of location film permit fees and that such report be
                              guided by the principle that administration/promotion of
                              location filming in Toronto shall be self-sustaining; and
                       (3)    that the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism
                              explore the possibility of any excess film permit revenues being
                              directed towards the subsidization of recreational user fees in
                              high-need areas. 
               (Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism; c.c.: Councillor
               Flint; Interested Persons - December 17, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(b))
79.            Board Composition for Toronto Economic Development Corporation (TEDCO).
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a joint report (December 9, 1998)
               from the Chief Administrative Officer and the Commissioner of Economic
               Development, Culture and Tourism responding to a request by the Economic
               Development Committee for a status report on the review of governance structure of
               TEDCO, a process for filling the 3 vacancies on an interim basis, and recommending
               that:
               (1)     Council confirm the attached amendments to TEDCO s By-law No. 1 and By-law
                       No. 3 as passed by the Board of Directors on April 14, 1998 to set the term
                       of Council Members on the Board of Directors at 18 months as requested by
                       the Council of the City of Toronto;
               (2)     the study of the role, mandate and composition of TEDCO s governance
                       structure currently being undertaken through the Task Force on ABCs by the
                       Chief Administrative Officer be coordinated with the study requested by the
                       Economic Development Committee on TEDCO s future and potential future role
                       in the City of Toronto s economic development strategy;
               (3)     in the interim, the seven incumbent board members continue to serve on the
                       board and the three vacancies be filled by Councillor Brian Ashton as Chair
                       of the Economic Development Committee and two citizens nominated by the
                       Mayor;
               (4)     once these appointments have been made, the Board of Directors elect a
                       Chair from among its voting members and the President of TEDCO would be a
                       Director ex officio; and
               (5)     the appropriate officials be authorized to take the necessary steps to give
                       effect thereto.
                       On motion by Councillor Feldman, the Committee deferred
                       consideration of the report (December 9, 1998) to its next meeting
                       on January 15, 1998.
                       (Chief Administrative Officer; Commissioner of Economic Development,
                       Culture and Tourism; c.c.: Interested Persons - December 17, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(m))
80.            Feasibility of Establishing a Telecommunications Authority and Related Matters
               Respecting Rights-of-Way and Access and Use.
               The Economic Development Committee had before it a report (November 26, 1998) from
               the Chief Administrative Officer providing a review of the context, the use of
               City s rights-of-way and road allowances for telecommunications infrastructure, an
               overview of the legislative environment for municipalities, and recommending that:
               (1)     the City of Toronto not establish a telecommunications authority, as
                       defined at this time, since regulation of the industry is under federal
                       jurisdiction and no authority exists for municipalities to establish a body
                       of this type;
               (2)     protection of City interests and its own use of the rights-of-way be
                       maintained without imposing a five-year term for Agreements with telecom
                       providers;
               (3)     Council authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to form an inclusive
                       inter-departmental working group for the purpose of exchanging information
                       and facilitating coordination, internal and external planning with respect
                       to telecom initiatives; and
               (4)     the inter-departmental working group report to the Corporate Services
                       Committee through the Chief Administrator s Office on City needs and uses
                       for its own infrastructure, best uses of these assets in the interests of
                       the public and businesses, as well as longer-term strategic measures.
                       On motion by Councillor Davis, the Committee deferred consideration
                       of the report (November 26, 1998) from the Chief Administrative
                       Officer pending a further report from the Chief Administrative
                       Officer for submission to the Committee s next meeting on January
                       15, 1999 commenting on the following suggested motions of
                       Councillor Rob Davis:
                               That the report (November 26, 1998) from the Chief
                              Administrative Officer be adopted subject to:
                              (1)     deleting Recommendation (1);
                              (2)     amending Recommendation (2) to read:
                                       (2)   a five year term for Agreements with
                                             telecom providers be imposed until
                                             such time that a report is submitted
                                             to the Economic Development Committee
                                             on a Strategic Direction on
                                             Telecommunications; 
                              (3)     amending Recommendation (3) by deleting the words
                                       Chief Administrative Officer  and inserting in lieu
                                      thereof the words  Information and Technology
                                      Services Division  and that Councillors Fotinos,
                                      Silva and Moscoe be appointed to this working group;
                              (4)     amending Recommendation (4) to read:
                                       (4)   the inter-departmental working group
                                             report to the Economic Development
                                             Committee in six months time on the
                                             roles, responsibilities and tasks
                                             listed in Appendix 1 of the report on
                                             future reporting and organizational
                                             structures in relation to the
                                             Strategic Direction on
                                             Telecommunications; 
                              (5)     adding the following additional Recommendation (5):
                                       (5)   that Appendix 1 of the report be amended by
                                             adding the following under the category
                                             titled  Recommend principles, policies and
                                             procedures for Council approval including: 
                                              -      the Works Department to maintain
                                                     revenues from right-of-way fees .
                       (Chief Administrative Officer; c.c.: Commissioner of Economic Development,
                       Culture and Tourism - December 17, 1998)
                                 (Report No. 7, Clause No. 5(l))
The Committee adjourned its meeting at 4:05 p.m.
                                                                                                  
                                                                                   Chair.
  |  
					|  |  | Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.
   |  |