City of Toronto  
HomeContact UsHow Do I...?Advanced search
Living in TorontoDoing businessVisiting TorontoAccessing City Hall
 
Accessing City Hall
Mayor
Councillors
Meeting Schedules
   
   
  City of Toronto Council and Committees
  All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.
   

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORTS OF THE STANDING COMMITTEES

AND OTHER COMMITTEES

As Considered by

The Council of the City of Toronto

on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998

STRATEGIC POLICIES AND PRIORITIES COMMITTEE

REPORT No. 10

1Novell Network Computer System

2Management Letter - Metropolitan Toronto Convention and Visitors Association for the Year Ended December 31, 1997

3Grants Contingency Fund

41998 Access and Equity Grants Program and Appeals

51998 Cultural Grants Allocations and Appeals

6Economic Development Partnership Program and Festivals and Special Events Program - 1998 Allocations and Appeals

7Employer Outreach Grants to Youth Employment Counselling Centres

8Breaking the Cycle of Violence Grants -1998 Allocations and Appeals

9Community Services Grants - 1998 Allocations and Appeals

10Homeless Initiatives Fund - 1998 Grant Allocations

111998 Commercial Research Grant Recommendations (Wards 23, 24 and 25 - Midtown, Downtown and Don River)

12Grant to Comité français de l'hôtel de ville (French Committee of Toronto City Hall) and Franco Fête (Francophone Festival)

13City of Toronto Support for 761 Community Development Corporation

14Ontario Volleyball Association, World Pro-Beach Volley Ball Event- Special Event Grant

15Process for Disbursing Grants to Property Owners for Termite Control

16Toronto Heritage Fund Grant Application - 427 Bloor Street West (Trinity St. Paul Church)

17Amendments to Bill 16 - Small Business andCharities Protection Act, 1998

18Appointments to the Boards of Management for Business Improvement Areas and Amendments to the (former Toronto) Municipal Code Chapter 20, Business Improvement Areas - Various Wards

19Province of Ontario Support for the 1998 Caribana Festival and Parade

201998 Operating Budgets - North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation (NYPACC)

211998 Capital Budget Request for Leaside Memorial Gardens (Ward 1 - East York) (Former Borough of East York)

22Business Travel Budget for Members of Council

23Financial Assistance for Public Art and Benches- Kensington Market Area

24Proposal for the Development of The Yorkwoods CommunityCentre Building into a Centre for Ethno-Cultural Development and Learning

25Allocation of Parks Levy Funds to Ed McLeverty Equal Access Playground (Ward 26 - East Toronto)

26Final Approvals - Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project (Downtown)

272008 Toronto Olympic Bid City Agreement

28Recreation Grants Program - 1998 Allocations and Appeals

29Public Meetings - Assessment and Taxation Issues

30Legislation Respecting Canadian Financial Institutions

31Contract No. T-42-98 - Don Valley ParkwayResurfacing at Two Locations

32Bus Garage Replacement Project - Property Acquisition

33Other Items Considered by the Committee



City of Toronto

REPORT No. 10

OF THE STRATEGIC POLICIES AND PRIORITIES COMMITTEE

(from its meeting on June 30, 1998,

submitted by Mayor Mel Lastman , Chair)

As Considered by

The Council of the City of Toronto

on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998

1

Novell Network Computer System

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends that the transmittal letter (May26, 1998) from the Audit Committee respecting the Novell Network Computer System, which was forwarded to Members of Council under confidential cover, be received.

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, a confidential communication (May 26, 1998) from the City Clerk setting out the actions taken by the Audit Committee on May 21, 1998 with respect to the Novell Network Computer System, and forwarding a confidential report (April 28, 1998) from the Commissioner of Corporate Services, such report to remain confidential in accordance with the provisions of Section 55(9) of the Municipal Act.)

2

Management Letter - Metropolitan Toronto Convention and

Visitors Association for the Year Ended December 31, 1997

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits, for the information of Council, the following transmittal letter (May 26, 1998) from the Audit Committee, and reports having received same:

Recommendation:

That the report (April 2, 1998) from the City Auditor attaching the management letter of the Metropolitan Toronto Convention & Visitors Association dated March 3, 1998, together with the communication (April 22, 1998) from Tourism Toronto in response, be received and forwarded to Council for information.

Comments:

At its meeting held on May 21, 1998, the Audit Committee had before it a report (April 2, 1998) from the City Auditor attaching the management letter of the Metropolitan Toronto Convention & Visitors Association dated March 3, 1998, together with a communication (April 22, 1998) from Tourism Toronto in response.

The Audit Committee was advised by the City Auditor that the response from Tourism Toronto was appropriate and that the 1998 Audit will ensure that the actions proposed by Tourism Toronto have been implemented.

The Audit Committee advises that it received the aforementioned report and correspondence and directed that copies be forwarded to your Committee and City Council for information.

--------

(Report dated April 2, 1998, addressed to the Audit Committee

from the City Auditor)

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the management letter of the Metropolitan Toronto Convention & Visitors Association dated March 3, 1998, be received for information.

Background:

As directed by the former Metropolitan Council, we are forwarding a copy of our management letter addressed to the President and CEO, containing comments on systems and procedures arising from the 1997 audits of the Association.

Contact Name and Telephone Number:

Jerry Shaubel, 392-8462.

--------

(Communication dated March 3, 1998, addressed to

Mr. Kirk Shearer, President & CEO, Metropolitan Toronto Convention &

Visitors Association, from the City Auditor)

We have completed the audit of the financial statements of the Metropolitan Toronto Convention & Visitors Association (MTCVA) for the year ended December 31, 1997. The primary purpose of our audit is to express an opinion on the financial position of the organization as at that date and the results of its operations for the year then ended.

During the course of our audit, we found areas where internal controls need to be strengthened or operations improved. This letter contains only our observations and recommendations relating to matters that came to our attention during the normal course of our examination and, as a result, may not include matters which a more extensive or comprehensive examination might disclose.

In this letter, we are presenting for your consideration our observations and recommendations on matters which relate to the system of internal control and which came to our attention during the course of our examination. In addition, there are a number of operational matters which you may wish to consider.

Compensation Committee Matters:

Observation:

The Board has established a Compensation Committee to ensure competitive and fair compensation for the staff of the Association. Among the responsibilities of the Committee are to approve all staff salary grades and ranges and approve staff salary changes. In 1997, management authorized general staff salary increases ranging from 1 percent to 5 percent and job upgrades to certain staff. We understand that the intent of the Committee's mandate is that no approval is required for general salary increases. However, no approval from the Committee was obtained for the job upgrades. The annualized increase and upgrades amounted to $53,000.00 or 3 percent or total payroll.

Recommendation:

(1)In accordance with Board policy, all staff salary changes should be made only upon approval of the Compensation Committee.

Observation:

In August 1997, Information Services staff were paid an incentive bonus totalling $38,800.00 without the approval from the Compensation Committee. The bonus represented 50 percent of the Department's net underexpenditure in 1996. However, there is no evidence that pre-approved criteria were established as a basis for the payment of such bonus. In addition, this amount was not accrued in the 1996 accounts.

Recommendation:

(2)In accordance with Board policy, all incentive bonuses should be approved by the Compensation Committee. The Committee should also establish appropriate criteria for the payment of all incentive bonuses. In addition, all bonuses should be recorded in the period in which they are earned.

Administrative Controls:

Observation:

The Office Manager is responsible for payroll preparation, the distribution of payroll cheques and the custody of unclaimed cheques. Good internal controls require the segregation of such incompatible functions.

Recommendation:

(3)While we appreciate the limited number of Accounting staff, management should reassign the responsibility for payroll distribution and custody of unclaimed cheques to someone independent of the payroll preparation. This would improve internal controls.

Observation:

The Office Manager is responsible for the calculation and input of master file changes affecting pay rates. While the changes are approved by supervisory staff, there is no independent check on the mathematical accuracy of pay rate calculations. Errors not being detected have resulted in the overpayment of salaries.

Recommendation:

(4)All payroll changes affecting pay rates should be checked by a person independent of the preparation and input functions.

Observation:

The Association has an agreement with an advertising agency for the production and placement of various consumer and trade advertising. In 1997, management discontinued its practice of requiring all tear sheets to support print advertising to be submitted and now requests only the tear sheets for specific items selected on a test basis. As at the end of the year, documentation was obtained only up to the first half of the year. We also noted that the extent of testing was limited to only two main advertising agencies although other agencies were utilized in 1997 for specific programs. Since advertising expenses represent a significant portion of the Association expenditures, it is essential that adequate controls exist to ensure that all advertising expenditures are valid.

Recommendation:

(5)Management should ensure that the verification of documentation supporting advertising costs covers all advertising agencies utilized by the Association. In addition, the verification procedures should be performed on a timely basis.

Membership Fees:

Observation:

The membership fee structure is approved by the Board. In special cases, the Membership Department may charge a lower fee. We noted that for some negotiated fees, there was no evidence that the fees were authorized by senior management.

Recommendation:

(6)Management should establish a policy requiring that all deviations from the approved membership fee structure be approved by senior management.

Observation:

The Membership Department maintains a database of all members which is used for publication. However, the database does not contain certain information such as number of employees which is used as the basis for the membership fee. Currently, Membership Department staff manually list the required information on the membership listing and calculate the appropriate fee. This information is forwarded to Accounting for billing. This procedure is time-consuming and prone to error. We understand that the Department is currently considering acquiring a new database system.

Recommendation:

(7)Management should consider enhancing the current database system to allow for the maintenance of all information required for membership fee calculation. The system could also be further enhanced by allowing the calculation of membership fee based on established criteria and the merging of information with the Accounting system for billing purposes.

General:

Observation:

In 1997, Tourism Toronto launched a site on the world wide web. We reviewed this site recently and noted that several pages contained stale information. For example, in a Section titled, "In the Spotlight... A hot event for each of the next three months", the three months highlighted were January, February and March. Clearly this information should be updated at least monthly. As another example, on the press releases page the most recent releases were dated September 30, 1997, more than five months old.

In order to generate and maintain user interest, a web site must contain current and frequently updated information. Although certain portions of the web site are designed to be relatively static, for example, the "About Toronto" section, others, as noted above are designed to be dynamic. Where a dynamic section of a site is not kept up to date, users may not be motivated to return to the web site. Further, dated information could have a negative impact on a users view of the value of the site causing them to leave the site after only a cursory review. Such actions are unlikely to generate the interest and responses which would be an objective of operating the site.

Recommendation:

(8)The Tourism Toronto web site should be reviewed and updated frequently.

Year 2000:

Observation:

Many computer systems are predicted to experience significant problems when their internal clocks advance into the year 2000. The year 2000 problems have received significant media coverage over the past year or so. A considerable number of computer systems and programs designed in the 1980's will fail to work correctly on January 1, 2000 because programs were designed with two digits to specify the year, rather than four. This was generally done in order to save expensive disk space. Thus, when a system's internal calendar flips to 1/1/00, it will have no way of computing the correct date. This will place any organization that relies on date-sensitive computing in jeopardy.

While it appears that there is adequate time to address this particular issue, many computer system professionals recommend that this issue be dealt with as soon as possible. Certain publications in Canada for example have indicated that organizations which began year 2000 system conversions as early as six years ago are encountering obstacles. Revenue Canada began upgrading its system nine years ago and has set a January 1, 1999 deadline to give its information technology officials a full year to work out any last minute problems.

We have discussed this matter with the Association's staff who have indicated that this particular issue has not yet been dealt with. In order to deal with this issue, the Association at some point may require external resources. However, finding the right kind of Year 2000 help is going to be an increasing challenge as the Millennium approaches simply because of the law of supply and demand. Consequently, it is important that this issue be dealt with expeditiously.

Recommendations:

(9)A year 2000 conversion plan should be developed as soon as possible. It may be appropriate to contact staff at the City of Toronto, who have recently established a specific Year 2000 project team to address this issue. The work being done by this team may be of use to the Association.

(10)Management should establish purchasing policies requiring that any new software is certified as "year 2000 compliant".

We have discussed the contents of this letter with Mr. Murray Vaughan, Vice President, Finance and Administration and would be pleased to discuss it further with you if you so wish.

--------

(Communication dated April 22, 1998, addressed to

the City Auditor from

Mr. Kirk Shearer, President & CEO, Tourism Toronto)

Thank you for attending the March 13th Tourism Toronto Finance and Administration Committee meeting. This letter is a response to the recommendations in the Management Letter with an explanation on how they will be implemented.

Recommendations 1 and 2 - Compensation Committee Matters:

The agenda for the March 13th Finance and Administration Committee meeting included two salary issues in Marketing and Administration. The Committee empowered staff to make compensation decisions that are within the approved Salaries/Benefits budget. The Committee requested that staff report these decisions to the Compensation Committee on a timely basis in future. The salary upgrades and bonus did not put the Salaries/Budget expense over budget. The actual for 1997 was $3,011,860.00 vs a budget of $3,090,101.00.

Recommendations 3 and 4 - Payroll:

I agree with both recommendations. It will be the responsibility of the Accounting Manager to distribute the payroll cheques and act as the custodian of the unclaimed cheques. This position will also check all payroll changes effecting pay rates. In the absence of the Accounting Manager, this responsibility will be transferred to the Vice-President, Finance and Administration.

Recommendation 5 - Advertising:

All advertising agencies will be required to submit tear sheets/affidavits. The media audit will be conducted on a test basis with each agency unless a discrepancy is found at which time the audit will be expanded.

Recommendation 6 - Membership Fees:

Any negotiated fees will be approved by the Vice-President, Marketing and myself.

Recommendation 7 - Membership Database:

The 1998 Capital Budget included funding to upgrade/replace the existing membership software.

Recommendation 8 - Web Site:

The web site is currently reviewed and updated by a webmaster. The budget provides for this position one day per week. Additional resources will be provided by the Marketing Department to ensure that the web site is reviewed and updated on a timely basis.

Recommendation 9 - Year 2000:

Thank you for the copy of your report to the Audit Committee on year 2000 issues. The Vice-President, Finance and Administration will be contacting the Commissioner of Corporate Services to see what assistance can be provided to Tourism Toronto in order to get ready for the year 2000.

If you agree with my response to the recommendations, I will submit copies of your letter and my response to the Board of Directors.

On a more personal note, thank you for your guidance and support over the last three years and for your encouraging comments made to our Board of Directors.

3

Grants Contingency Fund

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached report (June 8, 1998) from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services respecting the Grants Contingency Fund.

The Municipal Grants Review Committee reports, for the information of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, having further:

(i)directed that the Commissioner of Emergency and Protective Services, following consultation with the Etobicoke Federation of Ratepayers' & Residents' Associations, be requested to report to the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on July 27, 1998, on the most appropriate way to monitor and address the noise problems in Etobicoke resulting from Lester B. Pearson International Airport, rather than providing a grant to EFRRA for noise monitoring equipment; and

(ii)deferred consideration of the request for $10,000.00 for the "Queering the Nation Conference" pending receipt of a further report from staff.

Ms. Sylvia Giovanella and Mr. Anthony Cole, Etobicoke Federation of Ratepayers' & Residents Associations, appeared before the Committee and answered questions in connection with their grant request.

--------

(Report dated June 8, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)

Purpose:

A proposed set of criteria to be used in the consideration of grant allocations requests from the grants contingency are outlined in this report.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

A grant contingency amount of $200,000.00 has been included in the 1998 Corporate Grants Budget.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the allocation criteria, as defined in this report, be applied to all ad hoc requests for grants; and

(2)the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

During the final deliberations on the 1998 Operating Budget, Council approved an addition of $200,000.00 to the combined grants budget to respond to one time, ad hoc grant requests. This grants contingency provides the Municipal Grants Review Committee with a source of funding should it choose to recommend allocations for purposes outside of the established grants programs.

The Municipal Grants Review Committee (M.G.R.C.) approved a report, titled "Ad Hoc Requests for City Grants" at its meeting on May4,1998, which recommended that all ad hoc requests be referred to staff for review and comment before being considered by the Committee.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

Criteria for the use of the Grants Contingency Funds:

It is recommended that the M.G.R.C. adopt the following criteria to assist staff and Committee members in determining the most appropriate and effective uses of the grants contingency:

(1)One Time Requests:

Only those requests which are for one time activities or programs should be considered. An ongoing activity or program may be considered for funding where there is a clear indication that another source of support will be available for the initiative in 1999. Any funding provided from the grants contingency must be clearly identified as one time and recipient organizations appropriately informed.

(2)City Mandate:

The first consideration of all requests for support is to determine whether or not the activity or program for which the funding is requested fall within the mandate and priorities as set out by City Council. If the proposed activity does not fall within the mandate of the City, the activity should not be considered for support.

(3)Outside the Mandate of Existing Grants Programs:

Funding requests for purposes that clearly fall within the mandate of an existing City funding program should not be considered for funding from contingency. If activities eligible for funding under the established grants programs were to be eligible, it may result in the grants contingency becoming a "back door" entry into existing grants programs, making it difficult to ensure that all applicants are treated in a fair and consistent manner.

Since it is anticipated that additional requests from the grants contingency will be made throughout the year, the M.G.R.C. may wish to reserve a portion of the contingency in order to respond to later ad hoc requests.

(4)Needs Arising from Transition:

Although every effort has been made to ensure a smooth transition with respect to City grant programs, there may be grants needs that arise as a result of the amalgamation and reorganization of the programs. Consideration may be given to previously funded organizations which, through no action of their own, have been inadvertently impacted as a result of transition.

(5)Submission of Financial Information:

Each potential recipient of funding from the grants contingency will be required to submit financial information and meet any conditions attached to specific funding recommendations before funds are released. Many requests for City support are received in letter form with little or no information. An example of a generic application form is attached to this report. The review and monitoring of all allocations funded from the Grants Contingency will be undertaken by the Grants Managers Workgroup.

Appendix A provides a list of the allocations from the Contingency to date and the proposed and outstanding requests.

Conclusions:

The above criteria are intended to assist Committee members and staff in making the best use of the limited funding available in the grants continency. The criteria build on the approach adopted by the Committee in the report, titled "Ad Hoc Requests for City Grants". The Municipal Grants Policy will need to address the issue of ad hoc or one time grants and propose an appropriate process to respond to such requests. In the interim, it is recommended that these requests be forwarded to the Secretary of the Municipal Grants Review Committee, who will refer the requests to the most appropriate City Department. Where the request does not clearly fall within an existing program area, it will be forwarded to the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services.

Contact Name:

Chris Brillinger, Tel: 392-8608.

--------

Appendix A

Approved by Council:

First Nations Festival $ 2,000.00

Canada's Walk of Fame25,000.00

Portuguese Day Festival13,023.00

40,023.00

Outstanding Ad Hoc Requests:

EFRRA15,000.00

Queering the Nation10,000.00

Gay Games Bid Not Recommended

25,000.00

Requests arising from the Appeal Reports:

Recreation 3,500.00

Community Services10,000.00

13,500.00

761 Community Development Corp.22,500.00

Total:$101,023.00

4

1998 Access and Equity Grants Program and Appeals

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached reports (May 19 and June8,1998) from the Chief Administrative Officer and Executive Director, Human Resources, respecting the 1998 Access and Equity Grants and Appeals.

--------

(Joint Report dated May 19, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the Chief Administrative Officer

and Executive Director of Human Resources)

Purpose:

This report presents the recommended allocations of $302,000.00 for the 1998 Access and Equity Grants Program.

Funding Implications:

The allocations recommended in this report fall within the 1998 Access and Equity Grants Program approved estimates of $307,000.00.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)$302,000.00 from the $307,000.00 Access and Equity Grants Program be approved as outlined in the attached 1998 Grants Allocations (Appendix I);

(2)the $5,000.00 balance be held in reserve for appeals and the Chief Administrative Officer and Executive Director of Human Resources report to the June 11, 1998, meeting of the Municipal Grants Review Committee with recommendations respecting the allocation of this reserve; and

(3)the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

The City of Toronto Council approved on February 4, 5, and 6, 1998, the report of the Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee governing the administration of grants for the transitional year 1998. In addition, City Council approved the report of the Municipal Grants Review Committee at its meeting held on March 4, 5, and 6, 1998, which recommended that, for the 1998 interim grants process, the Municipal Grants Review Committee be used as the appeal mechanism, to hear and respond to deputations by applicants. The grant recommendations are made in accordance with the Terms of Reference for Multicultural Activities approved on December 4, 1984, by the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto. The following information is appended to this report:

(i)1998 Grants Allocations (Appendix I);

(ii)1998 Summary of Applications and Recommendations (Appendix II); and

(iii)1998 Guidelines and Criteria for the Access and Equity Grants (Appendix III).

Program Objectives and Funding Categories:

The criteria which must be met by all requests are:

(i)to strengthen an anti-racism climate in Toronto; and

(ii)to promote respect and value for Toronto's multicultural and multi-racial character.

Requests were considered in the following three categories:

(a)Anti-Racism:

Activities such as advocacy on human rights and race equity issues, public education programs and other projects which are designed to eliminate racial discrimination.

(b)Access and Equity Development:

Activities include those that are directed at improving ethno-racial and Aboriginal access to public sector services and at facilitating access to the decision-making of public institutions so that barriers preventing equal participation are identified and eliminated. Activities which promote civic participation of ethno-racial and Aboriginal communities are also included.

(c)Anti-Hate Activities:

Activities to combat hate activity, which involve the participation of residents, communities and public institutions.

Method of Application and Assessment:

An Information Session was held on January 27, 1998, for interested applicants. The 1998 Access and Equity Grants applications were made available in January 1998 along with Guidelines and Criteria. Applications were returned to the Access and Equity Centre by February 20, 1998.

All applications included a description of the organization's purpose, the project or activity for which assistance is being sought, financial statements and budget projections. Additional documentation provided included members of the board of directors, authorized signing officers, board authorization of the grant request, audited financial statements and letters of endorsement.

Each application has been assessed based on the eligibility and funding criteria. Agencies whose activities are within the criteria and eligibility requirements of other City of Toronto's grant programs such as Cultural Grants and Community Services Grants program are ineligible.

The balance of applications were assessed based on the need of the community being targeted through the project, priority of the activity with respect to identified needs within Toronto, the potential long-term impact of the project, the ability to complete the project, as well as, the administrative and financial record of the organization. In addition, consideration has been given to the financial viability of the proposal, the state of development of the organization and its track record in the community, as well as its level of financial need. Other sources of funding are included in grant applications as well as funding sought and approved from all other levels of government.

Program Priorities for 1998:

The allocation of the 1998 Access and Equity Grants Program was determined in context of strategies to:

(i)maintain the delicate race relations community infrastructure that currently exists at the same time to assist new communities so that they can advocate for their unique issues;

(ii)provide organizations which have demonstrated their abilities to carry out effective advocacy on anti-racism, access and equity issues in order to maintain a diminished but sustainable community infrastructure;

(iii)support co-operation, networking and coalition building within communities and between communities and institutions;

(iv)provide support to projects to combat hate activity, including public education, data collection, victim assistance; and

(v)support projects which facilitate community access to institutions.

Comments/Discussion:

Whilst the same criteria and priorities were applied in the assessment and recommendations process as in the year 1997, a few key issues are highlighted below:

(a)the 1997 Metropolitan Police Services Hate Crime Statistics indicate that crimes motivated by hate, bias or prejudice have risen by 7 percent in 1997 over 1996 in the Toronto area. Hate motivated crimes based on race accounted for the highest number of occurrences. Blacks, South Asians, Asians, Gays and Lesbians were primarily victims of assaults. Jews were victims of mischief and threats. Of the criminal activities, 41.7 percent were assaults, 17 percent of assaults involved weapons, 27.8percent were damage to property, 13.9 percent were threats. Hate propaganda on the internet is also increasing; and

(b)according to the York University's Institute for Social Research study, "Ethno-Racial Inequality in Metropolitan Toronto", the data shows that ethno-racial groups with the highest unemployment rates in 1991 are: Africans from specific nations (25.8 percent), Mexican and Central Americans (24.7percent), Tamils (23.9 percent), Sri Lankans (20.5 percent), and First Nations people (19.7 percent). The study found that groups with the most unemployment are not those with the least education. Where poverty is concerned, while 19 percent of all families in Toronto are defined as living below the "low income cut-off", the data shows that the highest levels of poverty are faced by the Arabs and West Asians, Latin Americans, and Blacks and Africans at 37.4, 33.9, and 33.5 percent respectively. Aboriginal and racial minority communities have struggled to attain equitable treatment within Canadian laws and institutions, however, the disparity in access to resources is widening.

To address these issues, organizations are funded by this program to counter the spread of hate activity. Some conduct educational workshops meeting the linguistic and cultural needs of the respective communities they serve, others develop educational materials, mass media tools such as public service announcements and transit posters. Some organizations have taken a lead in Canada for providing assistance to victims of hate crimes.

In addition, two thirds of the grants are allocated to groups to advocate on behalf of disadvantaged communities. These groups are routinely consulted by different levels of government. They participate on various advisory committees in the municipal government, provincial government, federal government, universities, hospitals, policing services and broader community sector with the objective of facilitating institutional change by introducing access and equity principles at the decision making level. Issues of major concern are: access to employment, equitable treatment in the workplace, equitable treatment in the public and private housing sector, access to services in municipal government, development of knowledge to start own business.

1998 Budget Allocation and Applications:

The following statistics provide a synopsis of the funding recommendation:

RecommendationsTotal NumberTotal Recommended

Returning Applicants: Recommended27$ 291,000.00

New Applicants: Recommended 2$ 11,000.00

Applicants: Not Recommended16$ 0

Total:45$ 302,000.00

Balance for Appeals $ 5,000.00

Basis for Allocation:

Forty-five applications were received. Twenty-eight are returning applicants. In an effort to maintain the community infrastructure for anti racism and equity programs, 27 returning applicants have been recommended for funding. Out of these, six umbrella organizations have been allocated an increased amount such that each receives $12,000.00 for their co-ordinating efforts and advocacy role. These umbrella organizations are: Access Action Council, Canadian Arab Federation, Chinese Canadian National Council, Council of Agencies Serving South Asians, Coalition of Visible Minority Women (Ontario), Inc., Hispanic Development Council, the League for Human Rights B'nai Brith Canada and the 519 Victim Assistance Program.

One of the returning applicants, Partnership for Community Access has not been recommended for funding based on a mutually reached agreement as its project falls within the mandate of their umbrella organization, Coalition of Agencies Serving South Asians. A total of 16 applicants could not be recommended for funding either due to lack of funds or to their not meeting eligibility requirements. The specific reasons have been outlined in Appendix II. Two new applicants have been recommended for funding namely, Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation and Transportation Action Now, Inc.

The Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants (OCASI) has been funded under the Multicultural Grants Program for several years. However, OCASI also received funding from the Community Resources Fund in 1997. Considered a sectoral planning and co-ordinating body, the agency maybe eligible under the Planning and Co-ordination Essential Community Function of the Community Resources Fund. Therefore, in preparation for 1999, staff of Community and Neighbourhood Services and the Access and Equity Centre will meet to finalize under which fund OCASI will be assisted.

The sum total of $307,000.00 allocated through the Access and Equity Grants Programs contribute to sustaining a non-profit voluntary infrastructure, without which their present work and the present fragile race relations climate would deteriorate.

A reserve of $5,000.00 is put aside for appeals. A report will be submitted to the June 11, 1998, meeting of the Municipal Grants Review Committee with recommendations respecting the allocation of this reserve.

Conclusion:

This report recommends that a total of $302,000.00 be approved to organizations which have been assessed to be eligible under the criteria of the Access and Equity Grants Program. It further recommends that $5,000.00 be held in reserve for appeals and that a report on the appeals will be submitted to the June 11, 1998, meeting of the Municipal Grants Review Committee.

Contact Name and Telephone Number:

Cassandra Fernandes, Tel: 392 3834 .

--------

Appendix 1

1998 Access and Equity Grants Allocations

Name of Organization

1997 Amount

Allocated

1998 Amount

Requested

1998 Amount

Recommended

Returning Applicants
1.Access Action Council

12,000.00

25,000.00

12,000.00

2.Anti-Racism Action Centre

10,000.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

3.Afghan Association of Ontario

3,500.00

17,000.00

3,500.00

4.Canadian Arab Federation

7,000.00

15,000.00

12,000.00

5.Chinese Canadian National Council

9,000.00

14,000.00

12,000.00

6.Council of Agencies Serving South Asians

9,000.00

12,000.00

12,000.00

7.Coalition of Visible Minority Women (Ontario), Inc.

11,000.00

15,000.00

12,000.00

8.Cross Cultural Communication Centre

40,000.00

40,000.00

40,000.00

9.Culture Link Settlement Services

3,500.00

5,000.00

3,500.00

10.Federation of Chinese Canadians in Scarborough

6,000.00

14,000.00

6,000.00

11.Ghanaian Businesses and Professionals of Canada

3,500.00

5,200.00

3,500.00

12.Heritage Skills Development Centre

3,500.00

7,450.00

3,500.00

13.Hispanic Development Council

9,000.00

15,000.00

12,000.00

14.Human Rights and Race Relations Centre

3,500.00

10,000.00

3,500.00

15.League for Human Rights of B'nai Brith Canada

10,000.00

12,250.00

12,000.00

16.Midaynta, Association of Somali Service Agencies

3,500.00

12,214.00

3,500.00

17.Native African Inmates and Families Association

3,500.00

14,822.00

3,500.00

18.Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants

15,000.00

20,000.00

15,000.00

19.Ontario Native Council on Justice

11,500.00

11,500.00

6,000.00

20.Parkdale Intercultural Association

14,000.00

14,900.00

14,000.00

21.Portuguese Interagency Network

7,000.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

22.Somali Committee for Racial Justice Trustee: Somali Canadian Society

3,500.00

7,000.00

3,500.00

23.Spirit of the People

12,000.00

12,000.00

16,000.00

24.Tamil Anti-Racism Committee

8,000.00

12,000.00

8,000.00

25.Urban Alliance on Race Relations, Anti-Racism Response Network

33,000.00

35,500.00

33,000.00

26.Victim Assistance Program Trustee: The 519 Church Street Community Centre

10,000.00

22,000.00

14,000.00

27.Women Working with Immigrant Women

7,000.00

8,000.00

7,000.00

Sub-Total I

$268,500.00

$396,836.00

$291,000.00

New Applicants: Recommended
28.Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation

0.00

12,900.00

5,500.00

29.Transportation Action Now

0.00

8,000.00

5,500.00

Sub-Total II

$ 0.00

$ 20,900.00

$ 11,000.00

Applicants: Not Recommended
30.African Canadian Advocacy

0.00

40,000.00

0.00

31.African Community Health Services

0.00

67,817.20

0.00

32.Christie/Ossington Neighbourhood Centre

0.00

14,985.00

0.00

33.Family Service Association of Metropolitan Toronto

0.00

17,186.00

0.00

34.Historical Connexion

0.00

100,000.00

0.00

35.Northwood Neighbourhood Services

0.00

10,074.00

0.00

36.Partnership for Community Access to Services

5,500.00

5,500.00

0.00

37.Planned Parenthood of Toronto

0.00

10,000.00

0.00

38.Refugees and Immigrants Information Centre Toronto

0.00

13,050.00

0.00

39.Silayan Community Centre

0.00

10,000.00

0.00

40.Skills for Change

0.00

13,640.00

0.00

41.Somali Community Information Centre

0.00

7,100.00

0.00

42.Tamil Resource Centre

0.00

11,650.00

0.00

43.Vietnamese Association of Toronto

0.00

5,000.00

0.00

44.WHYY MEE

0.00

25,000.00

0.00

45.Women's Health Centre

0.00

4,988.00

0.00

Sub-Total III

5,500.00

355,990.20

0.00

Total

$274,000.00

$773,726.20

$302,000.00

Note:Item No. 8, Cross Cultural Communication Centre received an advance payment of 50percent equal to $20,000.00. The balance recommendation is for a sum of $20,000.00 only.

(A copy of each of the Appendices II and III referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda of the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on June1,1998, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

--------

(Report dated June 8, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee, from the

Executive Director of Human Resources)

Purpose:

To make recommendations to the Municipal Grants Review Committee on the allocation of the $5,000.00 reserve in the 1998 Access and Equity Grants Program.

Funding Sources:

Funding is provided through the 1998 budget approved by the City of Toronto Council for the Access and Equity Grants Program.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the appeal fund of $5,000.00 be allocated as recommended in Exhibit 1 of this report; and

(2)the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

On June 1, 1998, the Municipal Grants Review Committee considered the report of May 19, 1998, regarding the allocations of a sum of $302,000.000 to grant applicants under the Access and Equity Grants Program. It further recommended that a report be submitted on the allocation of the $5,000.00 reserve for appeals.

The following individuals representing four organizations made deputations to the Municipal Grants Review Committee at its meeting on June 1, 1998, appealing that they be considered for funding through the Appeals Reserve of the 1998 Access & Equity Grants Program.

-Ms Esther Green, Whyy Mee Family Counselling Foundation;

-Ms Lynn Cooper, Historical Connection;

-Mr. Sinniah Sibapathasundaram, Refugees and Immigrants Information Centre Toronto; and

-Ms Karen Baldwin, The 519 Victim Assistance Program.

Out of the four organizations cited above, the first three were not recommended for funding in the report of May 19, 1998. The fourth appellant requested consideration for additional funding from the appeals reserve.

Staff responsible for administering the grants program once again reviewed the grant proposals, the original recommendations, and considered the information presented in the deputations. As a result of the review, the following are the recommendations:

(1)Whyy Mee Family Counselling Foundation of Metropolitan Toronto, incorporated in 1989, is an organization that assists first time offenders, prior to, or after court appearance; assists family consultation and support on social problems, advocacy; offers assistance and intervention in domestic violence. Funding is sought for a "Youth Counselling Preventative Training" geared to ethno-specific youth and families.

Comments:

There is a substantive need for such services especially since there has been a high reporting of violence amongst youth. The organization is well established and has developed substantive programs for youth since 1989. The request for funding was for $25,000.00 in order to provide preventative training to youth. The project merits recognition, however, such a request is better served by the City's Community Resources Fund, the Criminal Justice System and the Education System.

(2)Historical Connection is situated at the Bell Centre for Creative Communications in East York, Centennial College campus. It has established an internet, African Canadian Historical Website and has submitted an application for building and maintaining of the Website, community outreach, Toronto research team and Community Database Centre consisting of information from archival centres, private collections, personal letters and interviews relevant to African history.

Comments:

The organization submitted a revised proposal requesting funding for $5,000.00 instead of the original submission for $100,000.00. Since it is a new and emerging organization, which is serving youth through the latest high technology educational medium, and is a project that has received a good response, it is recommended that seed money be given to assist the organization in leveraging for resources through other funders. It is, therefore, recommended that $3,500.00 be allocated to Historical Connection from the appeals reserve.

(3)Refugees and Immigrants Information Centre Toronto, Inc. provides settlement counselling, interpretation and translation services, and language training to refugees and new immigrants. The organization is seeking funding to implement a combination of workshops, panel discussions and community meetings dealing with the issues facing Tamil youth.

Comments:

There is a great need for services in the Tamil community. This organization is new and well intentioned and would like to offer comprehensive services to a needy population. In January 1998, the group was referred to the City's Community Services Department to submit an application to the Community Service Grants Programs as they would qualify under that criteria. As the organization is more appropriately eligible under the Community Services Grants Program, it is not recommended for funding.

(4)Victim Assistance Program of the 519 Church Street Community Centre exists to assist Toronto's lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered communities against hate motivated violence, to provide assistance, information and referral to victims of hate motivated violence and abuse, and to advocate on behalf of victims with the appropriate agencies and institutions. The Victim Assistance Program seeks funding to increase the support available to victims, increase community awareness of services available, increase community knowledge of how to respond to potential or actual violence, increase information about violence to the general public.

Comments:

The Victim Assistance Program has undertaken high priority initiatives and has a good track record for completion of projects. Countering hate crimes and hate activity through prevention and partnerships is a high priority under the Access and Equity grants program. It is recommended for an additional funding of $1,500.00.

Exhibit 1:

The recommendation for the appeals reserve of $5,000.00 is based on further consideration to projects which are a high priority such as providing assistance to victims of hate crime and assistance to youth.

The recommended allocation of the appeals reserve fund is identified below:

Organizations Recommended for the 1998 Appeals Reserve Allocation:

AgencyAppeal ReserveTotal Grant

Recommended 1998

((1) Whyy Mee Family Counselling Foundation --

(2) Historical Connection $3,500.00$ 3,500.00

(3) Refugees and Immigrants Information

Centre Toronto--

(4) Victim Assistance Program of the 519

Church Street Community Centre$1,500.00$15,500.00

Total Recommendations:$5,000.00

Conclusion:

The recommendations regarding the allocation of the appeals reserve have been developed in response to agency deputations and the grants budget. Whilst the needs demonstrated by the appellant organizations are valid, substantive and serious, recommendations have been made based on the size and amount of the appeals reserve and within the parameters of the program's eligibility requirements.

Contact Name:

Cassandra Fernandes, Tel: 392-3834.

5

1998 Cultural Grants Allocations and Appeals

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached reports (May 20 and June8,1998) from the Commissioner, Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, respecting the 1998 Cultural Grants Allocations and Appeals.

--------

(Report dated May 20, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism)

Purpose:

This report recommends the allocation of the 1998 consolidated Cultural Grants Program, including two former line-item grants.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

Sufficient funds for the 1998 Cultural Grants allocations exist in the Arts and Culture Grants component of the Corporate Grants appropriation.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)Cultural Grants totalling $3,698,540.00 be allocated in 108 grants to 105 organizations, as set out in Appendix 1;

(2)payments to a maximum of $33,000.00 be approved to two organizations for which grants have been recommended, subject to meeting specific conditions;

(3)$8,000.00 be transferred from the Cultural Grants component of the Corporate Grants appropriation to the Parks and Recreation operating budget for the continued provision of free space at the Whitlam Avenue Warehouse; and

(4)the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

The overall approach to the grants review and allocations process in 1998, as outlined in the Administration of Municipal Grants Programs report (Clause No. 1 of Report No. 1 of The Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee) approved by Council on February 4, 5, and6, 1998, has been to undertake a simplified review process, provide flatline allocations to returning organizations that do not have identified performance issues, and to consider new and project-based applicants using grants funds made available by non-returning organizations or those with reduced allocations. The priority for staff has been to manage the amalgamation of seven previous programs and, at the same time, work to simplify the 1998 allocations process and minimize any negative impact on funded organizations.

Funds made available through attrition within the Cultural Grants Program have been recommended to new and project-based applicants. This reflects the importance of open access to municipal grants programs as identified in the Administration of Municipal Grants Programs report. Although some geographic redistribution of grants funds has occurred naturally through this process, staff have not purposefully attempted to undertake this redistribution in the 1998 transition year.

The following information is appended to this report:

(1)recommended allocation of the 1998 Cultural Grants;

(2)summary of 1998 applications and recommendations; and

(3)1998 Cultural Grants Guidelines and Terms and Conditions of Grants.

Discussion:

Administration of the Consolidated Cultural Grants Program:

The 1998 Cultural Grants Program consolidates the seven arts and culture grants programs of the former municipalities. While there existed some differences in eligibility criteria for the seven programs, they were similar in their fundamental principles, making it possible to consolidate the programs with little impact on funded organizations in the transition year while a new grants policy is developed.

Although the programs were consolidated into a single program with a single application form and one set of simple, eligibility requirements and assessment criteria (see Appendix 3), the Administration of Municipal Grants Programs report set out the following division of responsibilities for the administration of the program in 1998:

(i)all applications from organizations operating in the former City of Toronto were administered and reviewed by the Toronto Arts Council (TAC);

(ii)all other applications, including applications from organizations previously funded by Metro and not the TAC, were administered and reviewed by staff of the Culture Office. This includes the four Regional Cultural Institutions formerly funded only by Metro: the Art Gallery of Ontario, the Canadian Opera Company, the National Ballet of Canada and the Toronto Symphony Orchestra; and

(iii)those applications received by the Culture Office from organizations operating in the former City of Etobicoke were reviewed by the Etobicoke Municipal Arts Commission.

This report recommends allocations on applications received and reviewed by the Culture Office, including those from the former City of Etobicoke.

Culture Office Review Process:

Staff of the Culture Office reviewed the applications received at the March 16, 1998, deadline and identified those organizations with a history of stable municipal funding whose applications demonstrated consistency of programming, and administrative and fiscal management. Those organizations are recommended to receive allocations equal to their combined 1997 municipal funding.

The Grants Committee of the Etobicoke Municipal Arts Commission reviewed all applications from the former City of Etobicoke, and their recommended allocations are contained in this report.

All other applications received a further review by a multi-disciplinary Advisory Panel or through individual advisor assessment. The role of all the advisors was to provide advice to staff on the merit of the applications based on the published assessment criteria (see Appendix 3). Advisors were selected to represent a broad range of experience and expertise, and a general knowledge of the cultural sector. The 1998 advisors were:

(1)Ann Brokelman - General Manager, Scarborough Philharmonic Orchestra;

(2)Janet Battaglia - Associate Director, CBC, and community theatre participant and former member, North York Arts Grants Advisory Panel;

(3) Shelly Crawford - Program Co-ordinator, Co-op Program in Arts Management, University of Toronto at Scarborough;

(4)Caroline Di Giovanni - Board Member, various cultural organizations and former Metro Councillor;

(5) William Lau - performing artist, arts administrator and Ph.D. candidate in ethnomusicology;

(6)Roger McTair - writer, filmmaker, and Board Member, Factory Theatre; and

(7)Gerald Smith - educator, arts consultant and Past President, Lakeshore Arts Committee.

Where an advisor had a direct or indirect pecuniary interest in an application under their consideration, they were required to declare that conflict in writing and refrain from any discussion on that application.

In all, 117 applications were received by the Culture Office. Of those, 22 requests were from organizations based in the former City of Etobicoke, including two first-time applicants. Of the remaining 95 applications, 58 were deemed by staff to qualify for a recommended allocation equal to their combined 1997 municipal funding; the other 37, including 20 first-time applications, were reviewed by advisors through the Advisory Panel or through individual assessment.

The Cultural Grants Program Budget:

The consolidated Cultural Grants Program Budget was approved at the 1997 level of $10,947,998.00. Of that amount, $7,285,118.00 has been designated for distribution by the Toronto Arts Council to organizations based in the former City of Toronto (Clause No. 13 of Report No. 8 of The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, approved by Council on May 13, 14 and 15, 1998). After an adjustment of $40,000.00 from this program to be consolidated in the City's 1998 grant to Caribana, the budget remaining for allocation through the Cultural Grants Program was $3,622,880.00.

The Administration of Municipal Grants Programs report directed staff to review line-item grants of the former municipalities to identify those that fall within the mandate of existing grants programs and to consolidate the administration of those funds in 1998. Of the nine line-item grants in the Arts and Culture component of the Corporate Grants allocation, two meet that criteria: the former City of Etobicoke supported Arts Etobicoke's Autumn ArtsFest with an annual line-item grant ($45,000.00 in 1997) and the former City of Scarborough supported the Scarborough Arts Council with an annual line-item grant ($40,000.00 in 1997). These organizations were also funded by Metro, with grants administered through the Cultural Grants Program. Under the consolidated 1998 Cultural Grants Program, these grants are being considered to form part of the base level of funding for the two organizations, and the allocations for the line-item grants are included in the total allocations recommended in this report.

In total, the budget available for allocation to Cultural Grants Program applicants reviewed by the Culture Office is $3,707,880.00, including $85,000.00 for the two above-noted line-item grants.

Allocation Issues:

Although the arts and culture grants programs of the former municipalities were administered in similar ways, some differences resulted in allocation issues this year. It must be noted that many organizations received support from two or, in some rare instances, three of the former municipal grants programs. This occurred in recognition of different aspects of the work undertaken by the organizations, or where the different municipalities viewed themselves as partners in the support of certain activity. Allocation issues have arisen because sometimes one municipality directed funds towards an organization's fiscal period or activity which was almost completed, while the other municipal funding partner was simultaneously funding upcoming activity.

There are six such instances in the allocations recommended in this report. Through the reallocation of funds made available from the reduced allocation to an organization in a hiatus period, three small, one-time, partial-grant adjustments have been recommended to bring three of these organizations into line with the funding cycle of the consolidated grants program. These three one-time adjustments, to the Art Gallery of York University, Les AMIS Concerts and the Toronto Canadian Chinese Artists Centre, are noted as such in Appendix 1, the list of recommended allocations, and in Appendix 2, the summary of applications and recommendations.

The other three organizations (Arts Etobicoke, the Joseph D. Carrier Art Gallery and the Koffler Gallery) have been recommended to receive split allocations this year, that is, a portion of their 1998 allocation is directed to complete the base level of funding for the current year, with the balance directed as a partial grant toward their upcoming activities. These situations, and others like them that exist in the list of applicants being administered this year by the TAC, will need to be reconciled in a future year with similar, one-time adjustments. Council should consider funding activities in advance of their occurrence as a "best practice". This issue will form part of the Municipal Grants Review currently underway.

A second issue in the allocation of the 1998 Cultural Grants Program is the transfer of $8,000.00 from the program's approved budget to the Parks and Recreation Division's operating budget to support the Whitlam Avenue Warehouse, a municipal facility which provides free space to community cultural organizations for storage and set building. The former City of Etobicoke annually transferred $8,000.00 in this manner to compensate the Parks Department's building account for lost revenue. This report recommends this transfer in 1998, but suggests that this arrangement be reviewed in the course of the Municipal Grants Review.

Summary of Allocation Recommendations:

Including the three one-time adjustments described above, this report recommends the allocation of 108 grants to 105 organizations. These organizations represent a broad spectrum of arts activity, from the fully professional to the semi-professional and the community-based. The distribution of "head offices" shows addresses in 27 of the City's 28 wards. Of course, the distribution of activity is more limited, since many wards do not contain appropriate venues for much of the activity undertaken by arts and culture organizations. Still, the distribution of activity ranges across all regions of the City.

Of returning organizations, five are not recommended for funding in this report:

(i)two of the organizations have yet to satisfy the terms of the municipal funding they received in 1997;

(ii)one organization is on hiatus while it undergoes a restructuring; and

(iii)two are project-based applications which, when assessed with the other project and first-time requests received this year, did not rank highly enough to merit a recommendation.

Of the 22 first-time applications received, 15 are recommended to receive support. The average first-time grant is $2,718.00.

Appeals:

$9,340.00 has been held back from the available Cultural Grants budget for consideration of appeals, to be heard at the Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 1, 1998. A report will be prepared for the Committee's meeting of June 11, 1998, with recommendations for the allocation of that hold-back.

Advances:

As outlined in the Administration of Municipal Grants Programs report, organizations were eligible to request interim advances of up to 50 percent of their 1997 combined level of municipal funding. The Culture Office received nine requests, and released nine advances, totalling $144,710.00. These advances will be deducted from the 1998 grant allocations to these nine organizations.

Conclusions:

The recommended allocations contained in this report are the result of a review of all applications received by the Culture Office at the March 16, 1998, deadline. The administration of the review was carried out in accordance with the process outlined in the Administration of Municipal Grants Programs report, adopted by Council on February 4, 5 and 6, 1998. The allocations recommended for organizations operating in the former City of Etobicoke were developed by the Etobicoke Municipal Arts Commission.

Contact Name:

Debra S. Lary, Tel: 392-8816.

--------

Appendix 1

1998 Cultural Grants Allocations

Explanation of Codes:

(A)Adjustments: one-time partial grants, recommended to bring the organization in line with the municipal funding cycle.

(C)Conditional Grants: grants to be released upon the applicant meeting the conditions contained in Appendix 2 of this report.

(C2)Conditional Grants: grants to be released part outright, and part conditional upon the applicant meeting the conditions contained in Appendix 2 of this report.

(F)First-Time Applicants: organizations that have never previously applied to any of the former municipal Cultural Grants Programs.

1997

Grant

1998

Request

1998 Recommended

Regional Cultural Institutions:

(1)

Art Gallery of Ontario

$373,620.00

$373,620.00

$373,620.00

(2)

Canadian Opera Company

854,970.00

854,970.00

854,970.00

(3)

National Ballet of Canada

767,670.00

767,670.00

767,670.00

(4)

Toronto Symphony Orchestra

773,640.00

773,640.00

773,640.00

Cultural Organizations:

(5)

Aale Mohammad Research Centre

-

5,000.00

3,000.00

(F)

(6)

African Culture Restoration Association

-

13,728.00

0.00

(F)

(7)

All Saints Greek Cultural Centre

-

10,000.00

2,000.00

(8)

All the King's Voices

3,000.00

3,000.00

3,000.00

(9)

Amadeus Choir of Greater Toronto

16,510.00

25,000.00

16,510.00

(10a)

Art Gallery of York University

12,290.00

12,290.00

12,290.00

(10b)

Art Gallery of York University

n/a

n/a

5,500.00

(A)

(11)

Art Starts Neighbourhood Cultural Centre

46,550.00

53,000.00

46,550.00

(12)

Arts Etobicoke

144,570.00

150,400.00

144,570.00

(13)

Arts Foundation of Greater Toronto

25,000.00

25,000.00

25,000.00

(14)

Arts York

12,000.00

12,000.00

12,000.00

(15)

Bach Children's Chorus of Scarborough

3,570.00

3,570.00

3,570.00

(16)

Bathurst Jewish Centre

-

5,000.00

4,000.00

(F)

(17)

Bell'Arte Singers

2,000.00

3,000.00

2,000.00

(18)

Bharathi Kala Manram

1,950.00

5,000.00

2,950.00

(19)

Caliban Arts Theatre

5,500.00

9,000.00

0.00

(20)

Canada Hindu Maamantram

300.00

2,000.00

1,000.00

(21)

Canadian Arab Federation

2,000.00

3,000.00

2,000.00

(22)

Canboulay Dance Theatre

2,600.00

14,000.00

2,600.00

(23)

Cascade Theatre

4,460.00

4,460.00

4,460.00

(24)

Cathedral Bluffs Symphony Orchestra

8,250.00

10,000.00

8,250.00

(25)

Cedar Ridge Studio Gallery

3,700.00

3,700.00

3,700.00

(26)

Centuries Opera Association

3,000.00

8,000.00

3,000.00

(27)

Chi-Ping Dance Group

1,500.00

3,000.00

1,500.00

(28)

Chinese Canadian Intercultural Association

2,500.00

5,000.00

2,500.00

(29)

Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto

-

5,000.00

3,000.00

(F)

(30)

CHP Artists

-

20,000.00

0.00

(F)

(31)

Cliffhanger Productions

-

6,000.00

4,000.00

(F)

(32)

Community Arts Education Centre

-

13,600.00

0.00

(F)

(33)

Community Jazz Project

-

10,500.00

0.00

(F)

(34)

Downsview Symphony Orchestra

-

5,000.00

2,000.00

(F)

(35)

East York Symphony Orchestra

14,810.00

15,000.00

14,810.00

(36)

Etobicoke Centennial Choir

5,000.00

5,000.00

5,000.00

(37)

Etobicoke Community Concert Band

5,000.00

5,000.00

5,000.00

(38)

Etobicoke Handweavers and Spinners Guild

600.00

500.00

500.00

(39)

Etobicoke Horticultural Society

450.00

450.00

450.00

(40)

Etobicoke Musical Productions

4,312.00

6,550.00

4,300.00

(41)

Etobicoke Philharmonic Orchestra

8,300.00

9,000.00

8,300.00

(42)

Etobicoke Youth Band

2,180.00

3,500.00

2,180.00

(43)

Etobicoke Youth Orchestra

4,500.00

5,000.00

4,500.00

(44)

Evolving Sculpture Ideas Danced in Space (E.S.I.D.I.S)

-

4,000.00

0.00

(F)

(45)

Feast of Fools Theatre

4,858.00

4,500.00

2,500.00

(46)

Festival Judaica

-

7,000.00

0.00

(F)

(47)

Festival Wind Orchestra

-

2,800.00

1,500.00

(F)

(48)

Franco-Fête

11,000.00

24,500.00

11,000.00

(49)

Franklin Carmichael Art Group

2,400.00

2,500.00

2,400.00

(50)

Frog and Nightgown Theatre Productions

-

12,000.00

6,000.00

(F)

(51)

Gallery, U of T, Scarborough Campus

3,170.00

3,170.00

3,170.00

(52)

Glendon Gallery

8,650.00

10,000.00

0.00

(53)

Guild of Portrait Painters

900.00

800.00

800.00

(54)

Hamazkayin Armenian Educational and Cultural Society

-

14,000.00

2,000.00

(F)

(55)

Harbourfront Centre - Craft Studio

4,750.00

4,750.00

4,750.00

(56)

Harmony Singers of Etobicoke

1,500.00

1,500.00

1,500.00

(57)

Hispanic Development Council

-

4,000.00

0.00

(F)

(58)

J.H.S. Opera Association

2,500.00

7,000.00

2,500.00

(59)

Japanese Canadian Cultural Centre

-

19,500.00

4,000.00

(F)

(60)

Jewish Artists Scholarship Society (Centre Spotlight)

-

4,500.00

2,500.00

(61)

Jewish Federation of Greater Toronto - Committee for Yiddish

2,000.00

2,500.00

2,000.00

(62)

Jewish Storytelling Arts

5,735.00

10,000.00

5,735.00

(63)

Joseph D. Carrier Art Gallery

16,900.00

20,000.00

16,900.00

(64)

Jubilate Singers of North York

3,950.00

4,500.00

3,950.00

(65)

Kannada Sangha

-

7,000.00

3,270.00

(F)

(66)

Koffler Gallery

23,500.00

30,000.00

23,500.00

(67)

Korean Dance Studies Society of Canada

6,800.00

6,900.00

6,800.00

(68)

Lakeshore Arts

5,000.00

15,000.00

5,000.00

(69a)

Les AMIS Concerts

4,240.00

7,500.00

4,240.00

(69b)

Les AMIS Concerts

n/a

n/a

2,400.00

(A)

(70)

Long Branch Historical Society

900.00

1,000.00

900.00

(71)

Mooredale Concerts

8,540.00

10,000.00

8,540.00

(72)

Mural Routes

5,000.00

5,000.00

5,000.00

(73)

National Ballet School

91,210.00

95,000.00

91,210.00

(74)

New Globe Theatre

2,000.00

12,000.00

2,000.00

(75)

North York Concert Band

1,000.00

1,500.00

1,000.00

(76)

North York Concert Orchestra

2,175.00

2,300.00

2,175.00

(77)

North York Symphony Association

47,000.00

57,000.00

47,000.00

(78)

Northdale Concert Band

1,900.00

2,000.00

1,900.00

(79)

Ontario Association of Art Galleries

2,930.00

3,000.00

2,930.00

(80)

Ontario Choral Federation

3,250.00

3,500.00

3,250.00

(81)

Ontario Mas' Producers Association

-

5,000.00

1,500.00

(82)

Ontario Puppetry Association

6,000.00

6,000.00

4,500.00

(83)

Panatics Steelband Network

4,500.00

4,000.00

4,000.00

(84)

Pirandello Theatre Society

-

3,000.00

0.00

(85)

Professional Association of Canadian Theatres

3,420.00

3,500.00

3,420.00

(86)

Prologue to the Performing Arts

3,900.00

5,000.00

3,900.00

(87)

Queensmen of Toronto

1,000.00

4,339.00

4,000.00

(88)

Royal Conservatory of Music

11,000.00

15,000.00

11,000.00

(89)

Sacred Music Society

5,000.00

12,000.00

0.00

(90)

Salon du livre de Toronto

1,840.00

1,800.00

1,800.00

(91)

Sarathi

-

6,100.00

3,000.00

(F)

(92)

Scarborough Arts Council

64,000.00

64,000.00

64,000.00

(C2)

(93)

Scarborough Dukes of Harmony

1,000.00

4,000.00

1,000.00

(94)

Scarborough Philharmonic Orchestra

18,500.00

18,500.00

18,500.00

(95)

Scarborough Sweet Adelines

500.00

1,500.00

500.00

(96)

School of the Toronto Dance Theatre

7,800.00

8,000.00

7,800.00

(97)

Seniors Art Services

3,100.00

17,500.00

2,600.00

(98)

Shakespeare in Action

3,210.00

4,000.00

3,210.00

(99)

Silhouettes Community Cultural Organization

-

7,000.00

500.00

(F)

(100)

Skylight Theatre

57,500.00

70,000.00

57,500.00

(101)

Solar Stage Theatre

29,650.00

34,000.00

29,650.00

(102)

Somali Community Information Centre

1,000.00

3,000.00

1,000.00

(C)

(103)

South Asian Women in Action

500.00

3,060.00

3,000.00

(104)

St. Bernadette's Family Resource Centre

4,000.00

16,000.00

2,000.00

(105)

Theatre Etobicoke

5,000.00

5,000.00

5,000.00

(106a)

Toronto Canadian Chinese Artists Centre

6,010.00

7,000.00

6,010.00

(106b)

Toronto Canadian Chinese Artists Centre

n/a

n/a

2,000.00

(A)

(107)

Toronto Downtown Jazz Society

3,000.00

10,000.00

3,000.00

(108)

Toronto Jewish Folk Choir

5,440.00

5,440.00

5,440.00

(109)

Toronto Mainland Chinese Community Centre

-

6,000.00

0.00

(110)

Turkish Culture & Folklore Society of Canada/Youth Drama Group

-

5,750.00

2,500.00

(F)

(111)

Urban Harvest Community Association

4,000.00

9,000.00

4,000.00

(112)

Vietnamese Society of Motion Picture and Television Pioneers

5,000.00

10,000.00

5,000.00

(113)

Waterfront Trail Artists

-

4,733.00

1,000.00

(F)

(114)

Weston Little Theatre

-

1,000.00

1,000.00

(F)

(115)

Weston Silver Band

-

4,000.00

2,000.00

(116)

York Artists Guild

2,000.00

3,000.00

2,000.00

(117)

York Weston Players

5,000.00

10,000.00

3,000.00

Other:

(118)

Whitlam Avenue Warehouse

8,000.00

8,000.00

8,000.00

Total Cultural Grants: 0

$4,095,590.00

$3,698,540.00

* Column is not totalled because the base of applicants varies slightly from year to year, and is therefore not comparable.

(A copy of each of Appendices 2 and 3 referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda of the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on June 1, 1998, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

--------

(Report dated June 8, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee, from the

Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism)

Purpose:

This report recommends the allocation of the holdback for appeals on the 1998 consolidated Cultural Grants Program.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

At its meeting of June 1, 1998, the Municipal Grants Review Committee received a report, entitled "1998 Cultural Grants Allocations", which recommended the allocation of $3,698,540.00 to 105 organizations. An amount of $9,340.00 was held back to respond to appeals. Sufficient funds for the allocation of this holdback exist in the Arts and Culture Grants allocation of the Corporate Grants appropriation.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the Cultural Grants appeals holdback of $9,340.00 be allocated as set out in Appendix 1 of this report; and

(2)the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

At its meeting of June 1, 1998, the Municipal Grants Review Committee received a report, entitled "1998 Cultural Grants Allocation", which recommended the allocation of $3,698,540.00 to 105 organizations. An amount of $9,340.00 was held back to respond to appeals.

Eight organizations provided written and/or verbal presentations to the Municipal Grants Review Committee, regarding either the amount of funding recommended to their organization, or the fact that they were not recommended for funding at all.

In developing recommendations for the allocation of the holdback for appeals, staff reviewed the original recommendations, the comments from the peer advisory panel which reviewed the applications, and considered the information presented in the appeal submissions and deputations.

The recommendations under appeal, along with all other recommendations, were reviewed in the context of available funds. This review was undertaken in a manner consistent with the original approach to grants allocation in 1998 and with the published criteria for the 1998 Cultural Grants Program, and involved both the staff of the Culture Office and the Etobicoke Municipal Arts Commission.

Discussion:

Appeals:

Of the eight organizations which appealed their allocations:

(1)two were first-time applicants not recommended for support;

(2)three were returning applicants not recommended for support;

(3)one was a first-time applicant appealing the amount recommended; and

(4)two were returning applicants appealing the amounts recommended.

Based on the information provided and a review of the original applications and advisory panel comments, staff are recommending funds to one of the returning applicants which had not originally been recommended for support, and recommending upward adjustments to the grants originally recommended to two returning and one first-time applicant. In all other cases, staff have confirmed their original recommendations.

Appendix 1 of this report sets out the rationale for the responses to the eight appeals.

Other Recommendations:

In order to accommodate a holdback for appeals in the first allocations report, the recommendations process was rigorous and conservative. Recommendations did not always reflect the level of support warranted by the quality of the application and the response of the peer advisory panel.

A review of all applicants not flat-lined under the Council-approved policy for 1998 grants allocations resulted in the identification of six such organizations. In the context of the funds available in the holdback for appeals, small upward adjustments are now recommended for the grants to those six organizations, as described in Appendix 1 of this report.

Conclusions:

The allocations recommended in this report fully expend the holdback for appeals to the Cultural Grants Program. Staff are supporting their original recommendations for four of the organizations which appealed, recommending allocations or allocations adjustments to the other four organizations which appealed, and recommending small upward adjustments to six other organizations recommended for support in the original set of allocations.

Contact Name:

Debra S. Lary, Tel: 392-8816.

--------

Appendix 1

1998 Cultural Grants - Allocation of Appeals Holdback

Appeals:

(19)Caliban Arts Theatre, founded in 1995, aims to develop, promote and present the talents and works of black artists in Toronto. The organization is seeking funding for its film festival, The Other Film Festival, at the Oakwood Village Library and Arts Centre, July 23-26, 1998.

Original recommendation: nil. Appeal recommendation: nil. The organization has yet to complete its production of "Wretched", for which it received grants in 1997 from both Metro and the former City of North York. Upon receipt of additional budget information, staff will consider redirecting some of the 1997 funds to the 1998 film festival.

(30)CHP (Children's Hour Productions) Artists, founded and incorporated in 1987, produces educational performances, exhibitions and entertainment of all kinds for family and child audiences. The organization is seeking funding for its production, "Respect Yourself", during its 1998/99 fiscal year.

Original recommendation: nil. Appeal recommendation: nil. The organization's Board of Directors comprises the General Manager, the Artistic Director, and their spouses; it does not meet the program assessment criteria of demonstrated community accountability, nor has the organization sufficiently demonstrated financial need.

(32)Community Arts Education Centre (CAEC) at Downsview Secondary School is an educational centre which offers studio classes in visual, media and performing arts on Saturdays, after school and in the summer months. The organization is seeking funding for "Arts Train", its pilot program during the months of July and August, 1998.

Original recommendation: nil. Appeal recommendation: nil. The Cultural Grants Program does not provide support to schools and other instruction programs. Toronto Parks and Recreation, North York District, has provided printing (valued at $20,000.00) for the 1998 summer program.

(74)New Globe Theatre, incorporated in 1992, is a professional theatre company dedicated to producing dynamic and provocative contemporary, classical and new theatrical material that engages an audience intellectually and emotionally. The organization is seeking funding for its full-scale production of "Valley Song" at the Studio Theatre, Ford Centre for the Performing Arts, April 16 to May 17, 1998.

Original recommendation: $2,000.00. Appeal recommendation: an additional $3,000.00, for a total of $5,000.00 in 1998. The company received a $2,000.00 grant in 1997 from the former Metro Cultural Grants Program, which resulted in some confusion over the company's previous level of support. The combined 1997 and 1998 support for this project is $7,000.00, representing 5.6 percent of the project budget.

(89)The Sacred Music Society, founded in 1996, encourages, supports and promotes public interest in sacred and liturgical music. The organization is seeking funding for its 1998/99 performances and activities.

Original recommendation: nil. Appeal recommendation: nil. The organization has failed to meet the conditions of its 1997 grant from the former City of Etobiocoke, which required it to incorporate, thereby disentangling the Board of Directors from paid staff. Those funds are still available to the organization, should it meet the grant conditions before the end of 1998.

(97)Seniors Art Services, founded in 1972, maintains a resource of performers for seniors' arts events and programs, conducts workshops, produces showcases and offers programs to physically and mentally challenged seniors. The organization is seeking funding for its 1998 activities.

Original recommendation: $2,600.00. Appeal recommendation: an additional $500.00, for a total of $3,100.00. The original recommendation was made in the context of the requirement for a holdback for appeals; under the current circumstances, an additional allocation is now recommended.

(109)The Toronto Mainland Chinese Community Centre, incorporated in 1995, promotes cultural exchange between mainland China and Canada, and encourages the work of Chinese-Canadian folk artists through the work of its producing arm, the Toronto Chinese Folk Art Centre. The organization is seeking funding for its Chinese New Year's Gala, January 16, 1999, at a downtown venue to be determined.

Original recommendation: nil. Appeal recommendation: up to $1,500.00, conditional upon receipt and review of a revised project budget. The original recommendation was made in the context of the requirement for a holdback for appeals; under the current circumstances, an allocation is now recommended. The organization is still encouraged to work with other cultural organizations in the Chinese community. Future funding will be contingent on an assessment of 1998 activities; the organization is required to notify staff of the dates and locations of these events. (This organization is also recommended for a $3,000.00 Recreation Grant and a $3,000.00 Community Services Grant.)

(113)The Waterfront Trail Artists, founded in 1997, is a collective of artists dedicated to involving the community in cultural activities such as art tours and special projects, including the Great Pumpkin Art Festival, which involves students in various art activities such as mask-making, music, illustration and story-writing, overseen by professional artists from the community. The organization is seeking funding for its Great Pumpkin Art Festival, taking place at two locations in the Etobicoke region of Toronto in October 1998.

Original recommendation: $ 1,000.00. Appeal recommendation: an additional $340.00, for a total of $1,340.00. This additional allocation is recommended in response to the fundraising information update distributed by the organization at its deputation.

Other Recommendations:

In each of the following cases, the original recommendation did not reflect the optimum level of support, given the overall assessment of the application. It is recommended that the balance of the holdback for appeals be distributed among the following organizations:

(45)Feast of Fools Theatre, formed in 1993, is a professional theatre company producing theatrical works and musical cabaret, and promoting new and rising talent. The organization is seeking funding for its 1998/99 season.

Original recommendation: $2,500.00. Additional recommendation: $500.00, for a total of $3,000.00.

(47)Festival Wind Orchestra, incorporated in 1997, has a mandate to develop the musicianship of community members and to provide a cultural outlet to the community-at-large. The organization is seeking funding for its 1998 activities.

Original recommendation: $1,500.00. Additional recommendation: $750.00, for a total of $2,250.00.

(60)The Jewish Artists Scholarship Society (JASS), founded in 1991, formed a partnership with the Morris Winchevsky Centre in 1997 to produce Centre Spotlight, a monthly showcase of talent presented in a cabaret atmosphere. The organization is seeking funding for its 1998 season of monthly Centre Spotlight showcases, presented on the third Saturday of each month at the Winchevsky Centre.

Original recommendation: $2,500.00. Additional recommendation: $750.00, for a total of $3,250.00.

(81)The Ontario Mas' Producers Association, founded in 1990, promotes Caribbean art and culture to the broader community. The organization is seeking funding for its annual Kiddies Carnival Parade in the Scarborough region of Toronto, July 26, 1998.

Original recommendation: $1,500.00. Additional recommendation: $500.00, for a total of $2,000.00.

(99)The Silhouettes Community Cultural Organization, founded in 1979, seeks to provide young people with an opportunity to develop leadership, social and musical skills through the discipline of teamwork and artistic performance in a steel drum orchestra. The organization is seeking funding for its 1998/99 programs and activities.

Original recommendation: $500.00. Additional recommendation: $500.00, for a total of $1,000.00.

(115)The Weston Silver Band, founded in 1921, is a brass band providing musical entertainment in Toronto and surrounding communities. The organization is seeking funding for the one-time replacement of older band instruments.

Original recommendation: $2,000.00. Additional recommendation: $1,000.00, for a total of $3,000.00.

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, a communication (July 8, 1998) from Mr. Stephen I. Selznick, Blaney, McMurtry, Stapells, Friedman, Barristers and Solicitors, submitting copies of correspondence dated June1, 1998 and June 11, 1998, concerning the cultural grant application from the Sacred Music Society (Ontario); and requesting that the decision to decline the Society's 1998 grant be reconsidered.)

6

Economic Development Partnership Program and

Festivals and Special Events Program - 1998 Allocations

and Appeals

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached reports (May 21 and June8,1998) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism respecting the Economic Development Partnership Program and Festivals and Special Events Program - 1998 Allocations and Appeals.

--------

(Report dated May 21, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the Commissioner of

Economic Development, Culture and Tourism)

Purpose:

This report seeks approval for the Economic Development Partnership Program and the Festivals and Special Events Program grant allocations with a combined total of $379,000.00. The report provides an overview of both programs, a description of the rationale and strategy applied and a listing of the recommended allocations.

Funding Implications:

The allocations recommended in this report fall within the Council-approved 1998 Municipal Grants budget of $45,160,000.00.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1) Economic Development Partnership Program grants totalling $294,000.00 be allocated to 14 organizations, as set out in Appendix 1;

(2)the disbursement of the Economic Development Partnership Program allocations be conditional on satisfying the Economic Development Partnership Program Guidelines (Appendix 4) and on project specific conditions set out in Appendix 3;

(3)Festivals and Special Events Program grants totalling $32,550.00 be allocated to six organizations, also as set out in Appendix 1;

(4) $51,950.00 be set aside for the Economic Development Partnership Program's allocation process in the Fall (application deadline date: September 11, 1998); and

(5)the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Background:

This report deals with two separate grants programs - the Economic Development Partnership Program, which comes from the former City of Toronto and the Festivals and Special Events Program which comes from the former City of York. Both programs were identified and combined for administrative purposes during the budgetary reporting process and both continue to be administered in 1998 by Economic Development staff at the City of Toronto. Both programs will be subject to a policy and program criteria review in 1998 which will have an effect on the programs in 1999. The criteria for both grant programs are based on former City policies. Since this year is a transitional year, no requests were sought from the other former Cities within the new City of Toronto.

Overview of the Economic Development Partnership Program and the Festivals and Special Events Program:

(a)Economic Development Partnership Program:

Applications for funding are accepted three times a year. The goal of the Economic Development Partnership Program is to facilitate the initiation or expansion of projects which will have substantial long term economic development benefits for the City of Toronto by contributing to the size of the local economy and/or to the generation of future economic growth and job creation. Projects funded in the past include: Canadian Music Week; Caravan; Festival of the Future; First Night; Moving the Economy - Sustainable Transportation Conference; ICSID - The Humane Village Congress, Gay Pride Week Economic Impact Study and many others. At least $50,000.00 of the total program budget has been reserved each year for new or one time only initiatives. City Council of the former City of Toronto recommended that for 1998, at least $30,000.00 of the program budget be used for developing and implementing local economic development projects in the cultural, tourism, food, sustainable transportation and/or green tourism industry sectors. Two projects for which allocations totalling $30,000.00 have been recommended as part of this report, fall within this category. For 1998, events and project being considered for funding have to be located within the boundaries of the former City of Toronto. Applications for grants from the Economic Development Partnership Program were received on February 6 and April 24, 1998 and reviewed in a manner consistent with the Program guidelines. The Program has a third and final application deadline of September 11, 1998.

(b)Festivals and Special Events Program:

The Festival and Special Events Grant Program began in 1995 with the purpose of supporting local festivals and special events that would create local community economic development benefits, build volunteer commitment and develop strong organizational structures and financial support. As part of this Program, festivals and special events were also viewed by staff as important tools in rejuvenating commercial and residential districts by attracting visitors to these areas, developing these areas as tourist destinations and instilling pride. Since the program began in 1995 eight festivals and special events have been supported by means of the program budget for over $70,000.00. Together these festivals and events have matched the contribution by successfully leveraging funding from private agencies including in-kind services and over 2,500 hours of volunteer support, attracting approximately 135,000 visitors. For 1998 the program will continue to fund festivals and special events located from within the boundaries of the former City of York. In past years deadlines have been set to coincide with approvals being made at the final Council meeting before summer break. This year Program applications were reviewed by the Festivals and Special Events Liaison Team on May 16, 1998, in a manner consistent with Program guidelines. No additional funding applications will be received for the Festivals and Special Events Program in 1998.

Method of Assessment:

Under the Economic Development Partnership Program developmental projects are eligible for ongoing support for a maximum of five years, with the maximum support in the fourth and fifth year set at 50 percent and 25 percent respectively of the level of support provided in the third year. Projects are also funded on a one time only basis. The organizations applying for support can be either a non-profit organization (incorporated or unincorporated) or a private business. Support for initiatives being undertaken by private businesses must take the form of a purchase of a sponsorship or advertisement which provides the City with a commensurate service or benefit. The program emphasis is on supporting the incubation and development of new initiatives which will substantially impact the local economy. Priority has been given to projects which lead to sustainable long term economic and employment benefits for the City; which have a good potential to become self-sustaining within the five year time frame of the program; and which involve substantive partnerships with the private sector.

Organizations applying for ongoing support in 1998 had to provide a report on the project which included financial statements, a discussion of the activities undertaken and an evaluation of the project which addresses the extent to which the City's economic development objectives were met.

In past years, applications were reviewed and recommendations made by a sub-committee of a Committee of the former City of Toronto Council. This year, applications have been reviewed internally by staff following a similar allocation strategy.

The program has three application deadlines to permit projects to be dealt with during the course of the year. The third and final deadline in 1998 is September 11. This group of applicants will be brought forward to the Grants Review Committee in October, and it's recommended that $51,950.00 of the budget be reserved to fund them.

The Festivals and Special Events Grant Program makes funding available to organizations initiating or carrying out ongoing festivals and special events. Organizations applying for funding can be a non-profit (incorporated or unincorporated) or a private businesses. However, many of the festivals and special events funded or recommended for funding have been through community-based organizations. The program supports festivals and special events that have the capability to display community economic development benefits, strong volunteer involvement and organizational structure and solid event financing with private sector support. In past years, applicants have been evaluated by an Interdepartment Festival and Special Events Liaison Team with recommendations forwarded to the Administrative Services Committee and final decisions made by the Council of the former City of York. This year, the Interdepartment Festivals and Special Events Liaison Team reviewed applications using the same program criteria. Its funding recommendations will be forwarded to the Municipal Grants Review Committee. A report establishing the Festivals and Special Events Grant Program and guidelines is available through the Clerk's office.

Conclusions:

The combined 1998 budgets for the Economic Development Partnership Program and the Festivals and Special Events Program was approved by Council at $379,000.00.

The following information is appended to this report:

(1) recommended allocation of 1998 Economic Development Partnership Program and Festivals and Special Events Program grants (Appendix 1);

(2) summary of 1998 applications and recommendations to date (Appendices 2 and 3); and

(3)Economic Development Partnership Program guidelines.

This report seeks approval for the 1998 Economic Development Partnership Program and the Festivals and Special Events Program allocations totalling $318,550.00 and requests the opportunity to return to the Municipal Grants Committee with recommendations regarding allocations for the final round of Economic Development Partnership Program applicants further to the final application deadline of September 11, 1998.

Contact Names:

Helen BulatRon Nash

Economic Development Partnership ProgramFestivals and Special Events Program

Toronto City Hall Office (392-7355)York Civic Centre (394-2889)

--------

Appendix 1

1998 Economic Development Partnership Program and

Festivals And Special Events Program Allocations

Applicant 1997 1998 1988

Allocation Request Recommended

Economic Development Partnership Program:

1. Contact

Photography

Association - Business

Forum & Photography

Incubator-$35,000.00 $20,000.00

2.Riverdale Community

Business Centre -

Tourism

Marketing Initiative- 25,000.0010,000.00

3.Heritage Skills

Development Centre/

Co-op Bakery Project- 26,500.0020,000.00

4.Beaches International

Jazz Festival/Economic

Impact & Marketing

Study- 70,000.0015,000.00

5.Festival Alliance

Toronto Project - 20,000.0020,000.00

6.Canadian Aboriginal Festival20,000.00 50,000.0020,000.00

Applicant 1997 1998 1988

Allocation Request Recommended

7.Short Film Festival20,000.00 30,000.0015,000.00

8.Street Style/Leading-

Edge Fashion, Arts

and Music Festival50,000.00 50,000.00 50,000.00

9.Toronto International

Film Festival50,000.00 50,000.0050,000.00

10.Cinematheque25,000.00 25,000.0020,000.00

11.Toronto Theatre

Alliance/T.o.tix 16,000.00 16,000.0016,000.00

12.Tabia Marketing

Project25,000.00 25,000.0025,000.00

13.Toronto Tourism

Awards 5,000.00 5,000.00 $5,000.00

14.Caribana 8,500.00 8,500.00 approved

Festivals And Special Events Program:

15.African Culture

Restoration

Association-Annual

Marcus Garvey

Day Celebration - 13,728.00 2,000.00

16.Urban Harvest

Community

Association -

Urban Harvest

Oakwood Village

Festival Of The Arts 5,500.00 9,000.00 5,000.00

17.Weston BIA - Weston

End Of Summer Blast 5,000.00 10,000.00 4,500.00

Applicant 1997 1998 1988

Allocation Request Recommended

Festivals and Special Events Program:

18. Portuguese Outreach

Committee - Portuguese

Youth Festival 5,358.00 8,500.00 4,850.00

19.York Children's

Carnival Committee -

Eglinton Junior

Carnival Parade13,200.00 15,000.00 11,200.00

20.Weston Bia -

Weston Santa

Claus Parade$5,500.00$10,000.00 $5,000.00

--------

Appendix 2

1998 Economic Development Partnership Program and Festivals

And Special Events Program Budget Status

Incorporating Recommendations Of This Report

Project 1997 Budget & Approved

Allocations

1998

Funding

Requests

1998

Recommended

Allocations

1998

Budget &

Approved

Allocations

Total Budget $340,908.00 $379,000.00
A. Total / New Projects $190,228.00 $87,000.00
B. Total / Ongoing Projects $320,000.00 $231,550.00 $8,500.00
C. Total / A. + B. Projects $510,228.00 $318,550.00
D. Total Unallocated $51,950.00 $370,500.00
A. New Projects:

Toronto EDPP -

Contact Photography Association $35,000.00 $20,000.00
Riverdale Tourism Marketing Initiative

(Local Economic Development Project)

$25,000.00 $10,000.00
Co-op Bakery Project

(Local Economic Development Project)

$26,500.00 $20,000.00
Beaches Jazz Festival $70,000.00 $15,000.00
Festival Alliance

Toronto

$20,000.00 $20,000.00
York Festivals -
Annual Marcus

Harvey Day Celebration

$13,728.00 $2,000.00
B. Ongoing Projects

Toronto EDP -

Canadian Aboriginal

Festival

$20,000.00 $50,000.00 $20,000.00
Street Style $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
Short Film Festival $20,000.00 $30,000.00 $15,000.00
International Film

Festival

$50,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00
Cinematheque $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $20,000.00
Toronto Theatre

Alliance

$16,000.00 $22,500.00 $16,000.00
Tabia Marketing

Project

$25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00
Toronto Tourism

Awards

$5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00
Caribana $8,500.00 $8,500.00
York Festivals -
Weston End of

Summer Blast

$5,000.00 $10,000.00 $4,500.00
Portuguese Youth

Festival

$5,358.00 $8,500.00 $4,850.00
Eglinton Junior

Carnival Parade

$13,200.00 $15,000.00 $11,200.00
Weston Santa

Claus Parade

$5,500.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00
Urban Harvest

Arts Festival

$5,500.00 $9,000.00 $5,000.00

(A copy of each of Appendices 3 and 4 referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda of the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on June 1, 1998, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

--------

(Report dated June 8, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee, from the

Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism)

Purpose:

This report addresses one of the recommendations adopted by the Municipal Grants Review Committee at their meeting of June 1, 1998, requesting that the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism report on providing an additional $4,000.00 on a pro-rated basis to those groups listed under AYork Festivals@ and that the event dates be included with the report.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that applicants for Festivals and Special Events Grants listed in the report of May21, 1998, not receive an additional $4,000.00 on a pro-rated basis.

Funding Implications:

There are no further funding implications associated with this report based on the recommendation.

Background:

The Festivals and Special Events Liaison Team met on May 15, 1998, to review six applications within the former City of York for financial assistance under the Festivals and Special Events Grant Program. As part of the process, a Festivals and Special Events Liaison Team consisting of staff from the former City of York was set-up in 1995 to review applications for funding and to provide recommendations to Council regarding funding and in-kind services.

On the basis of the Festivals and Special Events Liaison Team review, it was recommended in the report of May 21, 1998, that all six applicants to the program receive grant funding. This recommendation was based on the purpose of the grant being to provide "seed" funding to community organizers of festivals and events so that organizers could use such leverage to secure additional funding from sponsors and to commit in-kind contributions and volunteer support. The aim of the Festivals and Special Events Grant Program is to develop, within these community based organizations, a growing level of self sufficiency and buy-in from sponsors.

Festivals and Special Events 1998

Funding Requested, Recommended and Event Date

Festival /Event Requested Recommended Event Date(s)
Annual Marcus Garvey Day Celebration $13,728.00 $ 2,000.00 August 15, 1998
Junior Carnival Parade 15,000.00 11,200.00 July 26, 1998
Portuguese Cultural Festival 8,500.00 4,850.00 September 12,1998
Urban Harvest Oakwood Village

Festival of the Arts

9,000.00 5,000.00 September 26,1998
Weston End of Summer Blast 10,000.00 4,500.00 September 5-7, 1998
Weston Santa Claus Parade 10,000.00

5,000.00

November 29, 1998

Conclusions:

While the Festivals and Special Events Liaison Team does not recommend additional funding on a pro-rated basis, it does support funding at levels recommended in the May21,1998, report entitled Economic Development Partnership Program and Festivals and Special Events Program - 1998 Allocations.

Contact Name:

Ron Nash, York Civic Centre, Tel: 394-2889.

7

Employer Outreach Grants to Youth Employment

Counselling Centres

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached report (May 14, 1998) from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services respecting Employer Outreach Grants to Youth Employment Counselling Centres.

--------

(Report dated May 14, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from

Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services)

Purpose:

To recommend grant allocations to six agencies involved in youth employment counselling for the purpose of supporting outreach to employers who might provide job placements to youth.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

Funds are available in the Consolidated Grants budget for 1998. There are no further financial implications.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)grants be provided to agencies involved in youth employment counselling as described in this report and as shown in appendix "A"; such grants are deemed to be in the interest of the Municipality; and

(2)the appropriate City Officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

This program was established by the Council of the former City of Toronto 13 years ago.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

Despite a recent upturn in the economy, youth unemployment remains high. This program was established to support the placement of disadvantaged youth in permanent jobs and/or training positions. The grants have been available to Youth Employment Counselling Centres as established under previous Provincial programs.

Although restructuring and renaming of those programs has technically meant that some of these groups are no longer involved in the new Provincial program, the need is still high and I am recommending that their grant be maintained this year since they are still involved in youth employment. I will report on any required changes later in the year when agency reports are available.

Conclusions:

Youth Employer Outreach grants are a valuable tool in dealing with the high rate of youth unemployment and should be approved this year on the same basis as previous years, pending agency reports and a review of the impact of changes to Provincial programs.

Contact Name:

Larry King, Toronto City Hall Office, Tel: 392-0622.

--------

Appendix A: Recommended Allocations

Applicant1997 Allocation1998 RequestRecommended:1998

St. Stephen's $19,500.00 $19,500.00 $19,500.00

Youth Employment

Counselling Centre

Woodgreen Employment 19,500.00 19,500.00 19,500.00

Services

John Howard Society 19,500.00 19,500.00 19,500.00

St. Christopher House 19,500.00 19,500.00 19,500.00

Parachute Community 19,500.00 19,500.00 19,500.00

Employment Centre

Youth Employment Services 19,500.00 19,500.00 19,500.00

Total$117,000.00$117,000.00$117,000.00

--------

Appendix B: Description of Applicants

St. Stephen's Youth Employment Centre is a program of St. Stephen's Community House located in the Kensington Market area and offering employment readiness and placements for disadvantaged youth.

Woodgreen Employment Services is a program of Woodgreen Community Centre, a neighbourhood centre located in the Broadview Gerrard area and offering employment readiness and placements disadvantaged for youth and adults.

The John Howard Society offers vocational and employment services for youth and adults involved with the criminal Justice system.

St. Christopher House is a neighbourhood centre offering employment counselling and placements for disadvantaged youth in the Parkdale area.

Parachute Community Employment Centre offers employment readiness and placements for disadvantaged youth in the Regent Park area.

Youth Employment Services (Y.E.S.) offers employment preparation, job placement for unemployed and out of school youth.

8

Breaking the Cycle of Violence Grants -

1998 Allocations and Appeals

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached reports (May 19 and June8,1998) from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services respecting the Breaking the Cycle of Violence Grants - 1998 Allocations and Appeals.

--------

(Report dated May 19, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services)

Purpose:

This report recommends allocation of grants to 52 applicants which applied for support through the Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants program.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

Funding of $485,000.00 for 1998 Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants is available in the consolidated listing of municipal grants.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants, totaling $473,000.00 be allocated to 52 applicants as recommended in Appendices 1 and 2 of this report;

(2)release of recommended funds be subject to the satisfactory completion of a Declaration form regarding the adoption of the former City of Toronto's non-discrimination policy; and

(3)the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, and that authority be granted to the Director of the Healthy City Office to execute letters of understanding with the approved grant recipients, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, on the terms and conditions as outlined in the report.

Council Reference/Background/History:

The Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants program was initiated in 1993 by the former City of Toronto as a result of recommendations made by the Safe City Committee, under the general authority for making grants which is provided in the Municipal Act Section 113 (1).

The overall approach to the grants review and allocations process in 1998, as outlined in the "Administration of Municipal Grants" report approved by Council on February 4, 5, and 6, 1998, has been to operate programs with the existing 1997 eligibility requirements, undertaking a simplified review process, and for project based programs such as Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants, to use existing program priorities to guide allocations recommendations. The Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants program is unique to the former City of Toronto, and, for 1998, applications have been limited to organizations based within the former City of Toronto boundaries.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

The Breaking the Cycle of Violence Grants Program:

The program was developed to complement a wide range of municipal initiatives being undertaken to make Toronto a safe place for people to live, work and play. The objectives of the program are to reduce violence against women and other vulnerable groups by providing additional resources to community groups for prevention education, community development, training, and innovations in service delivery and activities that increase access to service by women who face barriers such as language, lack of accommodation for disabilities, cultural basis of service delivery, housing or income status. The Safe City Committee provided annual advice to staff on outreach priorities for the program; for 1998 organizations serving low income women and children, disabled women and youth were identified as service areas for additional outreach.

Budget:

The Breaking the Cycle of Violence program has a 1998 budget of $485,000.00, the same amount as in 1997. Recommendations for allocations as outlined in Appendix 1 total $473,000.00. An amount of $12,000.00 has been held for appeals.

Applications and Review Process:

By the March 2, 1998, deadline, community groups had submitted 87 proposals totaling requests of $1,262,548.00. The application form was based on the form used in 1997 by the former City of Toronto, and included information on program priorities, terms and conditions and reporting requirements for successful applicants. Applications from new and returning applicants were accepted to this project-based program. Staff from the Healthy City Office assessed applications against existing criteria to prepare recommendations for funding. In light of the need to streamline the review process in 1998, additional information (where needed) was sought from agencies by phone, rather than through interviews. The staff for the Safety Task Force provided input into the review process. Applicants have been notified of the recommended grant, and have been informed about the appeal process at the Municipal Grants Review Committee.

Program Goals and Priorities:

The three primary goals of the grants program are to:

(1)increase accessibility of services to First Nations, immigrants disabled, visible minority women and women with special needs, through front-line, ethnospecific and multicultural services;

(2)provide community education and community development through innovative programs directed at prevention of violence; and

(3)provide education and training for staff and volunteers in intervention and prevention strategies.

Grants to address these goals are awarded in two categories: Prevention grants are for projects under $10,000.00 and Demonstration grants are for projects over $10,000.00, with an upper limit of $50,000.00. Prevention grants are intended for projects that utilize known and innovative strategies, and increase an applicant's capacity to address prevention of violence within an identified community or neighbourhood. Demonstration grants are provided for service innovations or the development of new approaches to community issues that show promise in breaking the cycle of violence. Demonstration grants are provided to groups with a track record of serving women affected by violence, in order to include the learnings from these services in prevention approaches. Demonstration grant applicants must undertake additional evaluation activities within the project, and have a plan for sharing the project results with others.

1998 Allocation issues:

Community interest in participating in preventing violence and increasing safety continues to manifest itself through a high number of applications to the grants program. The number of applications and level of funding requested by applicant organizations remain similar to previous years, and are significantly beyond the ability of the grants program to address. In addition to community interest, the grant application process indicates that community groups would benefit from additional resources for program development, resource sharing and current information on effective prevention strategies.

Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants are provided for project support, not core or sustaining funding for organizations' ongoing services, and the program continues to attract and respond to a high number of new applicants and new projects each year. In recommending allocations to returning applicants, consideration has been given to recommending further funding for activities that need additional time to develop, or for activities that effectively build on the previous year's project outcomes. Providing support for ongoing program delivery is beyond the scope of this grants program. Groups are encouraged to develop plans to incorporate effective prevention activities within their current core services, although the difficulties this presents in the current funding climate are recognized.

These issues, along with other program and policy concerns raised through community consultations, will be addressed in the service review process currently being undertaken by all City of Toronto grants programs. A report outlining proposed changes and options for delivery of the program in 1999 will be forwarded to the municipal grants review committee in September 1998.

Allocation recommendations:

As in previous years, allocation recommendations include consideration of how well the group of recommended projects reflect the overall concerns of the program. These overall concerns include: increasing services to First Nations, disabled immigrant and visible minority women and women facing barriers to service; providing support for neighbourhood projects across the area; encouraging coordination and sharing of resources and knowledge; maximizing the variety of innovative projects that can be supported, encouraging the development and retention of local skills and resources, including proposals that use early intervention strategies with at-risk population; supporting proposals, or components of proposals to a level where they can be effectively completed and supporting targeted prevention and intervention programs, not core administrative costs.

Appendix 1 provides a detailed listing of the applicants and the recommendations for funding in 1998. Appendix 2 includes a summary of each project request, and comments on the grant purpose and conditions (if any).

A total of 87 applications was received, and 52 are recommended for grants totaling $473,000.00. Appendix 3 provides a list of recommended projects by primary program activity and/or program target group.

1998 Allocation Summary:

Number of new groups: 38New groups recommended:23

Number of returning groups:49Returning groups recommended:29

Number of prevention requests:61Prevention grants recommended:38

Number of demonstration requests:26Demonstration grants recommended:14

Recommended projects directed at increasing access to services: 11;

Recommended projects providing innovative community education/community development: 37; and

Recommended projects providing training for staff and volunteers: 4.

Terms and Conditions:

Approved grants for Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants are governed by terms and conditions which are set out in a letter of understanding between the agency and the City of Toronto. The terms and conditions cover issues such as the expectations about the purpose of the grants, how funding is to be acknowledged, payment and report schedules, accounting and use of funds, grant periods and disclosure of information. Applicants are provided with a detailed explanation of the terms and conditions for the grants and a sample of the letter of understanding in the application package for the grants. The Director of the Healthy City Office will have responsibility for executing the letters of agreement, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Appeals:

An amount of $12,000.00 is available for appeals. Groups have been notified in writing of the opportunity to appeal the grant recommendations to the Municipal Grants Review Committee.

Conclusions:

The Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants program enables a wide variety of community organizations to participate in making Toronto a safer place to live and work and play. The 1998 recommendations provide communities with effective ways to address prevention issues which they have identified as priorities.

Contact Name:

Fran Perkins, Director, Healthy City Office, Tel: 392-0099/Fax: 392-0089.

Sue Kaiser, Grants Coordinator, Healthy City Office, Tel: 392-0406/Fax: 392-0089.

--------

Appendix 1

Breaking The Cycle of Violence Grants

1998 Grant Allocations

File1997 1998 1998

No.Organization NameAwardRequestRecommendation

$ $ $

98-01519 Church Street Community Centre14,000.0022,000.0014,000.00

98-02Abrigo15,000.0020,000.0011,000.00

98-03African Training & Employment Centre (ATEC)7,000.009,000.006,000.00

98-04African Women Resource & Information Centre0.0010,000.000.00

98-05Ambassador Partnership8,500.0010,000.007,500.00

98-06Blake/Boultbee Women's Safety Committee2,000.002,000.000.00

98-07Boys and Girls Club Downtown Toronto4,000.009,000.008,000.00

98-08Canadian Centre for Victims of Torture9,000.009,750.009,000.00

98-09CANORA/Canadiens et Canadiennes

d'origine africaine, antillaise et asiatique0.0042,300.000.00

98-10Casa Dona Juana0.009,995.000.00

98-11CEECA/Conseil d'Echanges Entre Canadiennes et

Africaines (Scarborough)0.0025,800.000.00

98-12Central Neighbourhood House0.0010,000.007,500.00

98-13Centre for Spanish Speaking Peoples0.0026,500.0012,000.00

98-14Child Abuse Survivor Monument Project, The0.009,660.007,000.00

98-15Chinese Family Life Services of Metro Toronto12,000.0023,000.0010,000.00

98-16Chinese Information & Community Services of0.009,961.000.00

Greater Toronto

98-17Christie/Ossington Neighbourhood Centre7,000.0014,800.007,500.00

98-18Coalition of Visible Minority Women (Ontario) Inc.8,000.0010,000.000.00

98-19CultureLink Settlement Services0.0010,000.009,500.00

98-20Delisle Youth Services12,000.0010,000.009,500.00

98-21Distress Centre0.0010,000.008,000.00

98-22Dixon Hall8,750.008,950.000.00

98-23Downtown Care Ring4,000.0010,000.000.00

98-24Dufferin Mall Youth Services0.0010,000.000.00

98-25East End Children's Centre0.004,460.002,000.00

98-26East End Community Health Centre0.0049,764.0020,000.00

98-27East York/East Toronto Family Resources11,000.0010,000.000.00

98-28Eritrean Canadian Community Centre of11,000.0011,000.0011,000.00

Metropolitan Toronto

98-29Ethiopian Association in Toronto Inc., The9,000.0010,000.000.00

98-30Family Service Association5,600.009,850.009,700.00

98-31Fred Victor Centre0.0031,326.000.00

98-32Friends of Dufferin Grove Park8,000.0010,000.003,000.00

98-33Harbourfront Community Centre7,000.009,225.000.00

98-34Harriet Tubman Community Organization7,000.0010,000.007,000.00

98-35Hispanic Development Council0.0023,000.0013,500.00

98-36Home for Creative Opportunity/Toronto Christian0.008,000.006,500.00

Resource Centre

98-37INTERCEDE for the Rights of Domestic Workers,6,000.008,000.000.00

Caregivers and Newcomers

98-38Jessie's Centre for Teenagers5,000.005,500.000.00

98-39Korean Canadian Women's Association12,000.0024,910.0010,500.00

98-40Leave Out Violence (L.O.V.E.)0.0010,000.000.00

98-41Metro Woman Abuse Council0.0022,200.0014,500.00

File1997 1998 1998

No.Organization NameAwardRequestRecommendation

$ $ $

98-42Metro Action Committee on Violence Against0.008,300.007,000.00

Women and Children (METRAC)

98-43Mixed Company0.0025,000.0019,000.00

98-44National Congress of Italian Canadians -

Toronto District5,750.009,790.007,500.00

98-45Native African Inmates and Families Association8,000.0010,000.000.00

98-46Native Canadian Centre of Toronto5,000.0010,000.005,000.00

98-47Native Child and Family Services of Toronto20,000.0038,000.0011,000.00

98-48Native Women's Resource Centre8,000.0010,000.007,500.00

98-49Neighbourhood Information Post0.006,750.005,600.00

98-50New Experiences for Latin American Women0.006,900.006,900.00

98-51Oasis Centre Des Femmes0.0010,000.0010,000.00

98-52Opportunity for Advancement18,000.0029,000.0016,000.00

98-53Parkdale Focus Community Project10,000.0040,427.0012,000.00

98-54Parkdale Intercultural Association2,000.0010,000.000.00

98-55Peace Games Toronto0.005,000.004,500.00

98-56Polish Immigrant & Community Services6,000.006,000.006,000.00

98-57Quaker Committee for Refugees6,000.0010,000.000.00

98-58Redwood Shelter8,500.009,380.000.00

98-59Regent Park Community Health Centre8,000.0010,000.008,500.00

98-60Riverdale Housing Action Group0.0010,000.000.00

98-61Scadding Court Community Centre8,500.009,866.000.00

98-62Serve Canada Youth Service Organization0.0010,000.008,500.00

98-63Silayan Filipino Community Centre0.0010,000.000.00

98-64Sistering0.0050,000.0017,000.00

98-65SKETCH/IMAGO - /Evergreen0.005,000.003,500.00

98-66South East Asian Services Centre8,000.0020,000.000.00

98-67South Riverdale Child-Parent Centre3,340.003,000.000.00

98-68South Riverdale Community Health Centre/ Riverdale0.009,000.006,800.00

Coalition Against Violence Against Women & Children

98-69Spirit of the People12,000.0012,000.006,000.00

98-70St. Christopher House6,000.0010,000.000.00

98-71St. Stephen's Community House20,000.0023,204.0020,000.00

98-72Stop 103 Inc.5,500.006,000.003,500.00

98-73Street Haven at the Crossroads0.0014,000.009,000.00

98-74Tamil Eelam Society of Canada8,000.0010,000.009,000.00

98-75Toronto Christian Resource Centre0.0017,300.000.00

98-76Toronto Friendship Centre, The0.0010,000.000.00

98-77Toronto Harassment Support Group4,000.009,860.004,500.00

98-78University Settlement Recreation Centre9,260.0050,000.000.00

98-79UPAWA0.0010,000.000.00

98-80Urban Alliance on Race Relations10,000.0010,000.009,500.00

98-81VOICE (Violence Overcome in Creative Ensemble)0.0030,000.000.00

98-82Victim Services Program of Metropolitan Toronto Inc.0.0010,000.006,000.00

98-83Women's Memorial Society of Ontario (East York)0.0020,000.000.00

98-84WoodGreen Community Centre0.0010,000.009,000.00

98-85Youth Assisting Youth6,000.008,820.000.00

98-86Youthlink20,000.0020,000.0010,000.00

98-87YWCA of Metro Toronto - Stop 865,000.0010,000.000.00

Grand Total$423,700.00$1,262,548.00$473,000.00

(A copy of the Appendices 2 and 3 referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda of the Municipal Grants Review Committee and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

--------

(Report dated June 8, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee, from the

Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services)

Purpose:

This report presents the recommended allocations from the $12,000.00 Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants program appeal fund for the organizations which appealed to the Municipal Grants Review Committee for reconsideration.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

Funding of $485,000.00 for 1998 Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants is available in the consolidated listing of municipal grants. The Municipal Grants Review Committee has received a report (May19,1998) entitled "Breaking the Cycle of Violence Grants - 1998 Allocation Recommendations" which recommends grants totalling $473,000.00 be allocated to 52 applicants. An amount of $12,000.00 was reserved to respond to agency appeals.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the appeal fund of $12,000.00 be allocated as recommended in Appendix 1 of this report;

(2)release of recommended funds be subject to the satisfactory completion of a Declaration form regarding the adoption of the former City of Toronto's non-discrimination policy; and

(3)the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto and that authority be granted to the Director of the Healthy City Office to execute letters of understanding with the approved grant recipients, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, on the terms and conditions as outlined in the report.

Council Reference/Background/History:

The Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants program was initiated in 1993 by the former City of Toronto as a result of recommendations made by the Safe City Committee, under the general authority for making grants which is provided in the Municipal Act Section 113 (1).

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 1, 1998, had before it a report (May 19, 1998) from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services recommending the allocation of Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants totalling $473,000.00 to 52 applicants. Twelve organizations provided a verbal presentation to the Municipal Grants Review Committee regarding the fact that they were not recommended for funding.

In developing recommendations for allocation of the appeal funds, staff reviewed the original recommendations and considered information presented in the deputations.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

Community groups submitted a total of 87 applications for 1998 grants through the Breaking the Cycle of Violence program. Fifty-two groups were recommended for support, and 35 groups were not recommended. Of the groups that were not recommended, 12 made a presentation to the Municipal Grants Review Committee at its meeting on June 1, 1998. No groups which were recommended for funding made an appeal related to the amount of their grant.

Of the 12 groups appealing, eight had received project funding in 1997, and four are considered as new applicants. Applicants are considered new if they have not received funding in the previous year, although some new applicants have received project support through the program in earlier years (prior to 1997). All but two of the groups making an appeal had received support from Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants program at some time in the past five years. This information is noted for each deputant in Appendix 1 of this report.

During the appeals, some groups provided information on changes in their program plans, and two identified revised requests for the amount of the grant. Some groups indicated that any amount of funding would be helpful in developing their activities. Each group included information in their comments on the specific community needs that would be addressed through the project activities.

In making recommendations for allocation of the appeals fund, staff considered the project proposals and the original recommendations as well as the information presented during the appeals. Consideration was also given to limited ability of the appeal fund to respond to the volume of requests presented by community organizations to the Municipal Grants Review Committee. Although many of the groups making an appeal identified a community need for support and a viable proposal, the available funds were not sufficient to address the level of request, which was $126,250.00 for these 12 organizations.

Three groups are recommended for grants from the appeal fund of $12,000.00, as identified in Appendix 1 of this report. In keeping with the project criteria of the Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants program, recommendations have been for one new applicant for a time limited project to reach youth, and for two returning organizations which received one year of support through the program, for further development of the agency capacity to reach marginalised and high risk women and families. No recommendations from the appeal fund were made for grants to groups with more than one previous year of support through the program. As noted in Appendix 2, staff will try to assist groups in identifying other resources which may be available to assist them with the proposed activities.

These recommendations bring the total of new groups funded to 24, (out of 38 new applicants). Grants are now recommended for 31 returning groups (out of 49 applicants).

Conclusions:

The Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants program enables a wide variety of community organizations to participate in making Toronto a safer place to live and work and play. Each year, requests exceed the level of support available for viable projects. Based on a review of the original recommendations and the information presented in the appeals, staff are recommending grants totalling $12,000.00 to three agencies as outlined in Appendix 1.

Contact Name:

Fran Perkins, Director, Healthy City Office, Tel: 392-0099/Fax: 392-0098.

Sue Kaiser, Grants Coordinator, Healthy City Office, Tel: 392-0406/Fax 392-0089.

--------

Appendix 1

Breaking The Cycle of Violence Grants

1998 Appeal Allocations

File 1997 19981998 Appeal

No.Organization NameAwardRequest Recommendation

98-04African Women Resource & Information Centre (2)*010,0000

98-06Blake/Boultbee Women's Safety Committee (2)*2,0002,0000

98-22Dixon Hall (4)*8,7508,9500

98-23Downtown Care Ring (3)*4,00010,0000

98-29Ethiopian Association in Toronto Inc., The (3)*9,00010,0000

98-40Leave Out ViolencE (L.O.V.E.) (0)*0**5,0004,500

98-45Native African Inmates and Families Association (1)*8,00010,0004,500

98-54Parkdale Intercultural Association (3)*2,00010,0000

98-57Quaker Committee for Refugees (3)*6,00010,0000

98-75Toronto Christian Resource Centre (0)*017,3000

98-78University Settlement Recreation Centre (1)*9,260**3,0003,000

98-81VOICE (Violence Overcome in Creative Ensemble) (2)*030,0000

Grand Total$49,010$126,250$12,000

*Indicates number of grants received by the organization since the start of the program in 1993.

**Request revised at appeal meeting.

--------

Appendix 2

Breaking the Cycle of Violence Grants

1998 Appeals: Project Descriptions and Grant Purposes

BTCV 98-04African Woman Information and Resource Centre

Project: Handbook on Violence Prevention:

The project will develop a handbook aimed at consolidating information on breaking the cycle of violence. It will address: an overview of violence in the African community; the myths and reality of violence; the misconceptions - cultural differences; African family dynamics (why violence seldom gets reported); rape and sexual harassment issues.

Comments: No grant is recommended. The group identified the community need for culturally appropriate education resources for the African Canadian community. The group is encouraged to develop its partnerships with other groups for the development of educational resources.

This group has received support through the BTCV program in two previous years.

BTCV 98-06Blake Boultbee Women's Safety Committee

Project: Blake Boultbee Women's Safety and Violence Prevention:

The committee will organize a series of community workshops which focus on prevention, self defense skills and community awareness of the issue of violence against women and children.

Comments: No grant is recommended. The deputation addressed the community need and new ideas the group has identified for program activities in 1998/99.

This group has received support through the BTCV program in two previous years. The revised project activities appear to be viable, and staff will meet with the group to identify any other resources that may be available to assist them.

BTCV 98-22Dixon Hall

Project: Roots of Change:

The Regent Park Intergenerational Hispanic Women's Support Group proposes to continue the work begun in 1997, dealing with abuse and relationship issues. The age range of participants will be expanded to include seniors in group programs and life skills activities. Sharing experiences and skills will build self-esteem and increase knowledge about community resources.

Comments: No grant is recommended. The project presented information on the local need for this project and the activities that would be undertaken. Staff will meet with the group to identify any other resources which may be available to them.

This organization has received support from the BTCV program in four previous years: the 1997 grant was specifically for this project. Dixon Hall also receives support through the City of Toronto Drug Abuse Prevention Program (1998 recommendation is $4,408.00), the Community Services Grants (1998 recommendation is $117,316.00), Major Recreation grants (1998 recommendation is $37,577.00) and Graffiti transformation ($23,000.00).

BTCV 98-23Downtown Care Ring:

Project: St Jamestown Youth Project:

This program hires a youth worker to provide programming for youth. Summer activities include a basketball league and a ball hockey league. Winter activities include attending the planning meetings for the working committee regarding youth and violence, and coordinating a homework club and indoor recreation activities. The project targets participation by young people from different cultural groups in St. Jamestown, and encourages peaceful community interaction through sports and the support of the youth worker.

Comments: No grant is recommended. The applicant identified the significant community need for this youth program, and staff will meet with the group to assist in identifying other possible sources of support.

This organization has received Breaking the Cycle of Violence support in three previous years to initiate the program. The organization also receives support from the City of Toronto Recreation grants for the summer component of this program (1998 recommendation is $6,000.00).

BTCV 98-29 Ethiopian Association:

Project: Prevention of Violence Against Women and Children:

The project will provide a series of educational workshops and community forums on issues of violence against women and children. The program will also provide services for victims of abuse, including computer software training for abused women and homework and tutoring support for children from families that have been broken because of violence.

Comments: No grant is recommended. The group identified the significant community need for this program and the need of the agency to respond to women victims of violence.

This group has received Breaking the Cycle of Violence grant support for education and support activities in three previous years. The group is encouraged to seek out other funding to support these ongoing services. The organization receives support from the City of Toronto Community Services grants (1998 recommendation is $20,886.00) and Recreation grants (1998 recommendation is $4,500.00) and staff of the programs will cooperate in assisting the group in looking at ways of strengthening its ability to provide this ongoing service to the community.

BTCV 98-40 Leave Out ViolencE (L.O.V.E.):

Project: Leave out ViolencE - Youth Outreach and Awareness Book project "L.O.V.E. WORKS":

The goal of this book, which includes a history of the organization, its mission towards the reduction of youth violence as well as powerful and provocative selections of the teenagers' work, is to raise the visibility of the issue of youth violence and to promote youth violence prevention. The group hopes to distribute the book to Toronto schools in order to provide educators with a valuable teaching tool.

Comments: A grant of $4,500.00 is recommended to assist the group in its peer outreach activities for the "L.O.V.E. WORKS" education resource. The group revised its request at the appeal and identified that it had received support for the printing of the book, and was in need of funds to support youth in related program activities in 170 Toronto schools. This is a first time applicant to the Breaking the Cycle of Violence program.

BTCV 98-45Native African Inmates and Families Association (NAIFA):

Project: Developing Strategic Alliances in Breaking the Cycle of Violence:

The goal of the proposed project is to continue to provide educational and community development activities with the African community, in particular for women, in order to enhance their ability in breaking the cycle of violence and enable them to live a more productive life. Workshop and outreach activities will be provided.

Comments: A grant of $4,500.00 is recommended to assist the group in outreach and support activities for women and children in African Canadian families where there is a history of violence or where family members are in conflict with the law. The group addressed the high level of community need, the specific and complex issues which African Canadian families face in seeking assistance. The group has received one year of support through the Breaking the Cycle of Violence program to undertake education activities on family violence topics. A second year of support will assist the organization in developing its ability to serve this target group.

This group also receives support through the City of Toronto Community Services grants (1998 recommendation is $1,500.00) and Recreation grants (1998 recommendation is $1,500.00).

BTCV 98-54 Parkdale Intercultural Council:

Project: Finding Cross Cultural Ways to Break the Cycle of Violence:

The Parkdale Intercultural Association's proposal is to reduce violence by taking a focus group approach to raising discussion on cross-cultural perceptions of violence, what can be done to implement actions taken against violence and introduce basic techniques and theories to help break the cycle of violence. In addition, PIA will host seven events to emphasize these approaches: one large community event; a series of four training workshops; and two ethno-specific workshops.

Comments: No grant is recommended. The group identified the high level of community need for this type of education in the community, and staff will meet with the group to assist in identifying other sources of support.

This organization has received support through the Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants for three previous years. The group also receives support from the City of Toronto Community Services program (1998 recommendation is $1,200.00).

BTCV 98-57 Quaker Committee for Refugees:

Project: Creative Art therapy for Refugee Children:

The proposed project provides theatre and painting workshops for children along with counselling, therapy and information exchange for parents, guardians and other family members. The main goal is to facilitate successful settlement and integration of refugee children and families into Canadian society. The program extends its activities into the community through participation in conferences, exhibiting the children's work, open houses, workshops and other community events.

Comments: No grant is recommended. This program has identified the Gerrard Resource Centre at Ryerson as its new sponsor, and Cultural Arts for Refugee Children as its new name. The appeal presentation identified the significant contribution that this program has made and will continue to make for refugees, and staff will meet with the organization to identify other possible sources of support.

The Art Therapy program has received support from the Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants for three previous years. Staff will meet with the organization to identify other possible resources.

BTCV 98-75Toronto Christian Resource Centre

Project: Rise:

This project will address issues of anger control; conflict resolution; violence; low self-esteem; after-violence trauma and support and protection under the law. Six to ten thematic workshops are to be held for staff, volunteers, service users and victims of abuse. A compilation of the ideas and lessons learned will be in the form of a booklet to share with other organizations. Story-sharing among the women is included to build a supportive environment, as well as increasing knowledge about treatment of violence and strategies for dealing with violence.

Comments: No grant is recommended. It was identified that this ambitious, agency-wide proposal would benefit from additional information on the rationale for the chosen strategies and the evaluation of program activities and outcomes. At the appeal, the applicant identified the significant needs of the target groups (homeless and underhoused and low income people) which would participate in this program, and indicated that the community development model chosen would involve participants in looking at what strategies and evaluation tools should be used. While components of this proposal have merit, the applicant is encouraged to address the identified issues more specifically for any future demonstration grant request.

This is the group's first application to the BTCV program. This organization also receives support through the City of Toronto Community Services Grants (1998 recommendation is $49,839.00), and Recreation grants (1998 recommendation is $4,500.00). (Home for Creative Opportunity, which is recommended for a 1998 BTCV grant, is co-located with the Toronto Christian Resource Centre, but the two organizations operate independently and reach different target groups.)

BTCV 98-78 University Settlement House:

Project: Building the Healing Circle for Survivors of Family Violence:

The project will train 12-15 young isolated women in areas of employment, social skills and family life education. Support groups will also be established for participants with children that have experienced violence within the family. Ten community volunteers will be trained as home visitors to regularly visit the participants and provide emotional and social support and enhance problem-solving skills. There will also be a public education component on violence prevention for the Grange community.

Comments: A grant of $3,000.00 is recommended. This group revised its request during the appeal, and will use the grant funds to assist women victims of violence in the Chinese community to participate in education and job readiness programs to increase their economic independence and reduce their risk for future abuse. The group received one year of support from the Breaking the Cycle of Violence grants to provide groups for women and support their participation in other employment skill programs. This second year of support would assist the organization in developing its capacity to serve this target group. This organization also receives City of Toronto support through the Major Recreation grants (1998 recommendation is $62,655.00), the Drug Abuse Prevention grants (1998 recommendation is $7,128.00), Community Services grants (1998 recommendation is $53,659.00).

BTCV 98-81 VOICE (Violence Overcome in Creative Ensemble):

Project: The 'Children's Rights as Human Rights' Campaign:

The project will focus on public education. Youth survivors of abuse will create and produce various multi-media products including T.V. commercials, music video, print ads, web sites etc., that will focus on educating the public regarding alternative, non-abusive methods of child-rearing discipline and the unacceptableness of all forms of violence and abuse towards children.

Comments: No grant is recommended. The group identified the local component of the proposed activities, and indicated that in addition to the existing partners, other organizations would be included in the program as it developed. Staff will meet with the group to identify other resources which may be available to support the overall project.

This organization has received support from the Breaking the Cycle of Violence grant program in two previous years.

9

Community Services Grants - 1998 Allocations and Appeals

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached reports (May 20 and June9,1998) from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services respecting the Community Services Grants Program - 1998 Allocations and Appeals, subject to amending the condition (24) in the June 9, 1998, appeals report respecting Friends of Shopping Bag Ladies (416 Drop-In Centre) (Grant No. 171) by deleting the last sentence of such condition and inserting in lieu thereof the following sentence:

"The referral system needs to be completed by August 14, 1998, and should this not occur, staff be requested to report back to the Municipal Grants Review Committee.".

The Municipal Grants Review Committee reports, for the information of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, having received communications from the following in connection with their grants appeals:

(a)(June 5, 1998) from Mr. Ali-Siraj Ali, Public Relations Officer, United Oromo Canadian Society of Canada (Grant No. 415); and

(b)(June 8, 1998) from Ms. Kathryn Seymour, Chair, Open Door Centre Board of Directors (Grant No. 284).

Councillor Jones, at the meeting of the Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, declared her interest in those portions of the 1998 Community Services Grants Program allocations pertaining to the Etobicoke Crime Prevention Association (Grant No. 149), and Thistletown Community Services Unit (Grant No. 383), in that her husband has prepared audited statements for such organizations.

--------

(Report dated May 20, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)

Purpose:

This report presents the recommended allocations for 433 agencies which have applied for municipal support under the Community Service Grants Program (C.S.G.P.). Of the 433 agencies that applied for grants, 386 have been recommended for funding.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

Sufficient funds for the 1998 C.S.G.P. allocations exist in the Community Services Grants Programs component of the Corporate Grants appropriation. A line item grant to Davenport Perth Neighbourhood Centre included in the Corporate Grants appropriation is also addressed in this report.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the attached 1998 Community Services Grants Program allocations totalling $11,947,891.00 for 386 agencies, described in Appendices A, B, and C be approved;

(2)an amount of $264,509.00 be allocated in September 1998 for Emergency Support Fund winter allocations;

(3)the special allocation of up to $28,000.00 to Davenport Perth Neighbourhood Centre by the former City of Toronto be granted in 1998, pending the conditions noted in Appendix"C"; and

(4)the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect hereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

Under the general authority for making municipal grants provided in Section 113 (1) of the Municipal Act, all of the former municipalities provided support to the not-for-profit sector through community service grants. The 1998 Community Service Grants Program, represents a combination of ten existing grants programs provided by the seven former municipalities as the primary means of municipal support for community-based agencies.

This report provides the recommended agency allocations for approval in the following former ten programs: East York Community Grants ($32,800.00), Etobicoke Community Service and Development Grants ($298,700.00), Metro Community Resources Fund ($8,292,900.00), Metro Emergency Support Fund ($1,200,000.00), Metro Special Projects Grants ($689,100.00), North York General and Sustaining Grants ($436,600.00), Scarborough Grants to Organizations ($266,800.00), Toronto General Grants ($676,800.00), and York Community Services Grants ($330,700.00).

While there is some variation in the policies and criteria, most community service grants programs have emphasized the following: disadvantaged and/or under-served communities; proposals to address gaps in service; small and medium sized organizations; and requests consistent with the municipality's mission and goals. In addition, some of the former municipalities favoured innovative and/or preventative approaches to service delivery.

This report includes detailed allocation recommendations for each applicant in Appendix C. The majority of returning agencies received funding from two or more of the former funding programs noted above (through the 1998 review process staff have determined that there has not been a duplication of funding under the former programs). Because requests were reviewed under a number of different sets of criteria, this report specifies what portion of agencies' total recommended allocations has been allocated under which particular criteria. This approach was necessary in order to maintain the stability of funding for agencies through this transition year. The reporting format in future years will be revised based on the directions set in the new Municipal Grants Policy.

Some former municipalities made additional funds available to organizations in need of urgent assistance as a result of unforeseeable circumstances outside the regular review cycle. Such emergency funding has not been included as part of the 1998 Community Service Grants Program process or budget.

The attached appendices provide more information on the grant recommendations to agencies: Appendix A - grant requests and recommendations by agency; Appendix B - recommendations to Aboriginal and ethno-specific and multi-ethnic agencies; and Appendix C - detailed summary of each applicant.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

Grants Administration:

The overall approach to the grants review and allocations processes in 1998, as outlined in the "Administration of Municipal Grants" report approved by Council on February 4, 5, and 6, 1998, has been to undertake a simplified review process, provide flatline allocations to returning agencies that do not have identified performance issues, and to consider new applicants using funds made available by non returning agencies or those with reduced allocations. The priority for staff has been to manage the amalgamation of ten previous programs and, at the same time, work to simplify the 1998 allocations process and minimize any negative impact on funded agencies.

Although redistribution of grants funds was a priority under the largest of the existing programs, the Community Resources Fund, staff have not attempted to undertake redistribution in the 1998 transition year. Any funds made available through attrition within the program have been recommended to new applicants. This reflects the importance of open access to municipal grants programs as identified in the "Administration of Municipal Grants" report.

The allocations processes of the various service areas, including the Community Services Grant Program, have been co-ordinated through an inter-departmental Grants Managers' Workgroup. There are a number of areas of crossover between the C.S.G.P. and other services areas. Staff have co-ordinated to ensure that the same activity is not funded twice, although there will be groups funded by two or more service areas. These situations will be addressed through the new Municipal Grants Policy.

1998 Budget:

The total amount approved in the 1998 Community Service Grants Program (C.S.G.P.) budget is $12,252,400.00. The C.S.G.P. budget reflects the amalgamated budgets of the former grant programs noted above and the $28,000.00 line item grant to the Davenport Perth Neighbourhood Centre.

An amount of $40,000.00 has been set aside for appeals. Agencies have been notified in writing about the appeals process and the availability of funds.

On February 4, 5 and 6, 1998, Council approved a policy to provide advance payments to agencies in receipt of sustaining funding from the former municipalities, on the condition that specific criteria were met by the agencies. To date, 131 previously funded agencies have received advance payments totalling $2,542,658.00.

Application and Assessment Process:

Overall, 433 agencies requested $17,514,177.00 under the 1998 Community Service Grants Program. This includes 379 previously funded agencies and 54 new applicants. Eighteen agencies funded in 1997 did not reapply for funding in 1998.

In 1998, a common application package was used for all applicants to the C.S.G.P. Grant applications already issued for 1998 funding by the former municipalities were deemed to be 1998 applications to the new City of Toronto. In some cases, agencies may have been required to submit additional information after a review of their original submission. The existing eligibility criteria of the former municipalities was used to assess applications and all applicants that were eligible for funding in 1997 continued to be eligible in 1998.

The assessment/review process was streamlined this year to facilitate the development of a municipal grants policy for implementation in 1999 and to allow staff to complete the review process in a timely manner. A team of grants staff assessed applications against existing criteria, principally using information provided in the application forms. Each applicant was assigned a single staff liaison, even if they previously received funding from a number of different community service grant programs. Extensive interviews were conducted with the following applicants: organizations with previously identified funding conditions; organizations with identified performance or dependancy issues; and new applicants. Agency interviews allowed grants staff to more fully determine eligibility, assess the capacity to deliver the proposed programs/services, clarify issues and discuss expectations regarding governance, financial management, community linkages, program development and delivery. Over 120 agencies represented by agency staff and/or board members were interviewed by grant staff. All new applicants received a site visit to determine the appropriateness of space for programs and/or agency activities. In addition, accountability documentation was required from each agency for the community service grants programs e.g., board minutes approving the application, list of Board of Directors with home addresses, and financial statements or audits.

Allocation Recommendations:

Of the 433 applicants, 386 agencies have been recommended for a total of $11,947,891.00. Of the remaining 47 agencies, one withdrew, one was not accepted and 45 are not recommended for funding.

The general approach to recommendations in 1998 was to flatline allocations at the 1997 levels to agencies that received sustaining/ongoing support. The principles of equitable access to grants, agency effectiveness and efficiency, community needs and available resources were considered in the review of new applicants and in the conditions and/or comments applied to some previously funded applicants. In cases where there are ongoing concerns related to performance or previously identified issues of municipal dependency, grant reductions have been recommended.

1998 Allocation SummaryNumber of Agencies

Recommended flatline*361

Recommended reduction 11

Recommended new applicants 14

Total386

*Of those agencies which are flatlined, 27 received additional funds in 1998 under the Winter Emergency Support Fund and, therefore, may appear to have received increases.

Of the 386 recommended agencies, six Aboriginal and 111 ethno-specific/multi-ethnic agencies will receive $2,309,607.00, or 19.3 percent of the total 1998 C.S.G.P. recommended allocations as noted in Appendix B . These figures do not include ethno-specific programs and services provided by non-ethno-specific agencies.

New Applicants:

Fifty-four agencies which did not receive funding in 1997 applied for support in 1998.

Five of these applicants received Community Service Grants Program funding in the past, but for various reasons, did not receive funding in 1997. Three of the five agencies are recommended for funding again in 1998.

Of the remaining 49 new applicants, 14 are recommended for allocations in 1998. Thirty-five applicants have not been recommended because they have been determined to be ineligible under the C.S.G.P. criteria. Agencies were deemed ineligible because:

(i)the agency requested funds for activities not funded under the C.S.G.P.;

(ii)the agency requested funds for activities which are eligible for funding under established funding programs provided by senior levels of government;

(iii)the agency does not have a social service mandate;

(iv)the agency has not yet developed the required organizational systems and structures;

(v)the agency has demonstrated considerable capacity to raise funds through donations and grants; and/or

(vi)the agency did not demonstrate the required level of performance through the interview and review process.

Of the new applicants recommended, eight are ethno-specific organizations providing services that are unavailable or not accessible from existing service providers.

Metro Emergency Support Fund:

The Emergency Support Fund (E.S.F.) was established by Metropolitan Council in 1996 at the recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Homeless and Socially Isolated Persons. This fund was designed to respond to the most pressing needs of the homeless and socially isolated population. Metropolitan Council approved a total of $750,000.00 for this fund in 1997 to be annualized in 1998 resulting in a $1,200,000.00 Emergency Support Fund.

The E.S.F. has been administered through a collaborative process, with the United Way of Greater Toronto, the former City of Toronto, Housing Division and the Hostel Services Division working with grants staff to develop a co-ordinated funding response to the needs of homeless and socially isolated populations. This approach has resulted in support for a range of services that meet the needs of this community.

This year, the E.S.F. has been administered as originally designed with two main streams. The first is for year round programs providing supports to the homeless population, the second is a winter specific response with funding for additional hours of service, or, other programs designed to respond to the specific issues facing the homeless population during the cold weather.

This report includes a flatline recommendations for agencies funded through the E.S.F. in 1997, as well as the $450,000.00 allocated in 1998 through the E.S.F. Winter allocation.

Once staff have completed an evaluation of the winter programs funded in 1997/1998 and determined service priorities across the City for the coming winter, meetings will be held with potential service providers to review service plans and funding requirements for the 1998-1999 Winter period. An amount of $264,509.00 has been reserved for 1998 E.S.F. Winter allocations and will be administered in the fall.

Metro Special Projects Grants:

There are four agencies funded under the former Metro Special Projects Grants Program: Metropolitan Toronto Action Committee on Public Violence Against Women and Children (METRAC), Metro Youth Council, Toronto Child Abuse Centre (formerly Metropolitan Toronto Special Committee on Child Abuse) and Victim Services Program of Metropolitan Toronto. The 1998 allocations for these agencies are included in this report.

In July 1997, the former Metropolitan Council approved the 1997 Special Projects Grants allocations report. All Special Project Grants recipients were required to submit anti-discrimination and access policies and directed to continue their efforts to reduce their financial dependency on the Special Projects Grants Program.

METRAC and Toronto Child Abuse Centre:

For the past several years, the Metro grant has accounted for a significant proportion of the total operating budget of METRAC and core administrative budget of Toronto Child Abuse Centre. Since 1994, both organizations had been directed to reduce their dependency on Special Projects Grants by seeking alternative funding sources and implementing fundraising plans. The Special Projects Grants accounted for 63.7 percent of METRAC's overall income in 1996 and 50.1 percent in 1997. The Toronto Child Abuse Centre's grant represented 88.4 percent of its total core administrative costs and 24.5 percent of its overall budget in 1996 and 71.1 percent and 27.9 percent respectively in 1997.

In 1998, both organizations have requested flatline allocations, METRAC at $241,425.00 and Toronto Child Abuse at $235,681.00. Last year METRAC raised approximately $17,543.00 net through fundraising activities and is currently in the process of developing its fundraising plan which should be ready later this year. The Toronto Child Abuse Centre fundraised over $27,000.00 net in 1997 and has doubled that amount since January 1998. Grants staff have again identified the need for these two agencies to rigorously develop concrete plans aimed at reducing their reliance.

The 1998 recommended funding level for these organizations is based on the level of dependency in 1997. For example, the Special Projects Grants accounted for 50 percent of METRAC's income in 1997, the 1998 recommendation has been set at 50 percent of the projected 1998 budget. These two organizations will be funded at a level which maintains them at the same rate of dependency of their 1997 grant, flatline allocations would result in an increased dependency on the Special Projects Grants.

Summer Day Programs:

The former Metropolitan Council initiated funding for summer day programs for school aged children in 1989 in response to Federal reductions in youth summer employment funds. Community-based agencies had been utilizing Federal funding to hire summer students to staff their summer day programs. Since 1994, the programs continued to be funded by Metropolitan Toronto under the Community Resources Fund and were monitored on an annual basis by Metro Children's Services staff. In 1998, the Summer Day Program budget has been flatlined at the 1997 levels and transferred to Toronto Children's Services of the Community and Neighbourhood Services Department. The administration and allocation of these funds are now provided under purchase of service agreements through the Children's Services Division.

Issues Identified During the 1998 Allocations Process:

The administration of an amalgamated Community Service Grants program in 1998 has highlighted a number of issues that will have to be addressed in the 1999 service review process.

Over the past few years, funding conditions and/or comments have been applied to a number of agencies related to the membership and board structure of their organization. Funded agencies are required to have an open and accessible membership structure providing an appropriate means of ensuring community input and control in decision-making. In some cases, agencies have not effectively implemented changes to address this situation. In 1998, these agencies will be required to develop a membership and board recruitment strategy which includes a review of the agency's bylaws, an analysis of the community to which the agency is accountable, the development of membership targets which ensure accountability to this community and an implementation plan. Staff will work with the agencies to facilitate the development of the required strategies.

Some funded agencies continue to have ongoing performance issues in the areas of governance, volunteer recruitment and development, administration and financial management, and service delivery. When significant performance issues have been identified, staff have provided referrals to resources have which assisted agencies to address the performance deficiencies. Staff have also provided a range of workshops, training opportunities and individual consultations to assist agencies.

Staff have identified a number of agencies which have considerable capacity to raise funds through donations and/or user fees and/or other grants and/or productive enterprises. Consequently, in 1998 these organizations are encouraged to develop other sources of income for the program(s) funded by the C.S.G.P. Given the need in the community for funding support, consideration may be given to reallocating funds to organizations with a greater demonstrated need in the future. Staff will meet with the noted agencies in the fall to clarify their ongoing need for municipal funding.

Services for Seniors:

Recently, the Provincial Government released the figures allocated for community long-term care services under/through community reinvestment. Of the $125.5 million allocated to Toronto, 75 percent will be allocated to the six Community Care Access Centres. The remaining 25 percent, approximately $3.9 million per year, will go to volunteer-based community services such as meals on wheels, day programs, friendly visiting and other such community supports.

Within the amalgamated City of Toronto, total municipal funding for all community-based seniors' programs amounted to over $3.4 million to 93 organizations across Toronto in 1997. The bulk of this money was administered by the former regional municipality of Metropolitan Toronto through the Community Services grants program. Approximately $3.1 million in grants funding ($1.2 million for elderly persons centres and almost $1.9 million in home support) was provided to 83 community organizations across the new City of Toronto.

The issue of potential changes in the need for municipal funding of these services will be addressed in the C.S.G.P. service review.

Service Area Review:

There are a range of issues for the service area review, including: the appropriate level of agency accountability under the amalgamated program and the staff resources are required to ensure agency accountability; how the City, as a funder, can improve its ability to determine the effectiveness and impact of grants as a tool to address the needs of communities; and, what mechanisms and policies are needed to facilitate the redistribution of the resources within the Community Services Grants Program. These issues will be addressed through the Community Services Grants Program service area review and reported out to the Municipal Grants Review Committee at its July 27 meeting.

Conclusions:

Community-based agencies play a critical role in the City's social service infrastructure. They contribute positively to the quality of life in their communities in a cost-effective and responsive way. During the Transition Team process, agencies and communities reiterated that the City's continued funding and support of their work was critical in these difficult times.

Agencies understand that resource constraints from all funding sources will continue. They have faced this challenge by making more extensive use of volunteers and by trying to increase their self generated revenues. Agencies have implemented many strategies to preserve programs and continue to serve their clients. Strategies have included increased workloads, salary and/or benefit roll backs, reductions in hours of service, and program cutbacks or closure. In addition, agencies have been strongly encouraged to pursue creative restructuring activities in order to maintain as much of the community based human service system as possible.

The reality of increasing community need and static or declining resources, poses a particular challenge for grants allocation process. The complexity of the allocations process in 1998 is significantly greater given the amalgamation of the grants programs. Every effort has been made to minimize the impact of amalgamation on agencies receiving support under the Community Services Grants Program.

This report recommends that a total of $11,947,891.00 be granted to 386 agencies under the C.S.G.P.

Contact Name:

Chris Brillinger, Tel: 392-8608/Fax: 392-8492, e-mail address: chris_brillinger@metrodesk.metrotor.on.ca.

--------

Appendix A

1998 Community Service Grants Programs

Agency Name

1997

Approved Allocation

1998

Amount Requested

1998

Amount Recommended

1. Abrigo Centre for Victims of Family Violence

$22,500.00

$22,500.00

$22,500.00

2. Accessible Community Counselling and Employment Service

9,700.00

9,700.00

9,700.00

3. Advocacy Resource Centre for the Handicapped (A.R.C.H.)

24,191.00

24,000.00

24,000.00

4. Afghan Association of Ontario

2,000.00

10,000.00

2,000.00

5. Afghan Women's Counselling and Integration and Community Support Organization

16,000.00

18,000.00

16,000.00

6. African Training & Employment Centre (ATEC)

19,000.00

26,000.00

19,000.00

7. Africans in Partnership Against AIDS

19,000.00

33,000.00

19,000.00

8. Afro-Canadian Caribbean Club (AFROCAN)

n/a

3,500.00

0.00

N
9. After School Program

n/a

20,000.00

0.00

N
10. Agincourt Community Services Association

38,500.00

48,600.00

38,500.00

11. AIDS Committee of Toronto

58,606.00

58,606.00

58,606.00

12. Alexandra Park Community Centre

14,447.00

16,000.00

14,447.00

13. Alliance of Technology and Science Specialists of Toronto Inc. (ATSS)

n/a

298,300.00

0.00

N
14. Alternative Youth Centre for Employment

5,000.00

15,000.00

5,000.00

15. Alternatives for Community Living in Etobicoke

5,000.00

5,000.00

5,000.00

16. Alzheimer Society for Metropolitan Toronto

10,000.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

17. Angolan Canadian League

n/a

20,000.00

5,000.00

N
18. Angolan Community of Ontario

2,000.00

10,000.00

2,000.00

19. Anishnawbe Health Toronto

139,171.00

229,950.00

131,000.00

EW
20. Applegrove Community Complex

34,932.00

34,932.00

34,932.00

21. Arab Community Centre of Toronto, The

17,303.00

20,303.00

17,303.00

22. Armenian Relief Society, Inc,- The "Roubina" Chapter

21,000.00

31,000.00

19,000.00

23. Asian Canadian Support Centre

n/a

27,000.00

0.00

N
24. Assaulted Women's Helpline

55,702.00

58,000.00

55,702.00

25. Association of Pensioners and Injured Workers of Ontario (APIO)

22,290.00

28,100.00

22,290.00

26. Association of Women of India in Canada (AWIC)

9,000.00

12,000.00

9,000.00

27. Autism Society of Ontario, Toronto Chapter

9,000.00

9,000.00

9,000.00

28. Aware-Pilipino Family Services

3,000.00

3,000.00

3,000.00

29. Barbra Schlifer Commemorative Clinic

28,000.00

28,000.00

28,000.00

30. Bathurst Jewish Centre

14,400.00

20,840.00

14,400.00

31. Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care

255,474.00

255,474.00

255,474.00

32. Bayview Community Hospice

3,000.00

3,000.00

3,000.00

33. Bereaved Families of Ontario - Metro Toronto

38,104.00

38,104.00

38,104.00

34. Bernard Betel Centre for Creative Living

104,544.00

104,544.00

104,544.00

35. Bikur Cholim: Jewish Volunteer Services of Toronto

14,000.00

14,000.00

14,000.00

36. Birchmount Bluffs Neighbourhood Centre

10,000.00

20,000.00

10,000.00

37. Blake Boultbee Youth Outreach Service

18,000.00

18,000.00

18,000.00

38. Bloor Information and Life Skills Services

23,900.00

25,095.00

23,900.00

39. Bloor-Bathurst Interchurch Gathering Spot

17,435.00

17,520.00

17,435.00

40. Blue Ribbon Child Care Society

n/a

152,590.00

0.00

N
41. Bob Rumball Centre for the Deaf

13,482.00

13,482.00

13,482.00

42. Boys and Girls Club of Downtown Toronto

30,642.00

23,642.00

23,642.00

SC
43. Braeburn Neighbourhood Place Inc.

38,448.00

37,000.00

31,948.00

SC
44. Brahms Residents Committee

23,000.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
45. Brain Injury Association of Toronto

2,500.00

10,000.00

2,500.00

46. Break for Play Co-operative Drop-In Centre

1,000.00

1,500.00

1,000.00

47. Broad African Resource Centre

n/a

83,000.00

3,000.00

N
48. Cabbagetown Youth Centre

23,956.00

n/a

n/a

SC
49. Canadian African Newcomer Aid Centre of Toronto (CANACT)

13,800.00

25,000.00

0.00

50. Canadian Cambodian Association of Ontario

27,000.00

34,000.00

27,000.00

51. Canadian Centre for Victims of Torture

18,700.00

28,150.00

18,700.00

52. Canadian Friends of Bikur Cholim Hospital

2,000.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
53. Canadian Hearing Society

14,800.00

14,800.00

14,800.00

54. Canadian Hindu Maamantram

300.00

n/a

n/a

T
55. Canadian Italian Family Assistance Association

9,400.00

9,400.00

9,400.00

56. Canadian Mental Health Association Metropolitan Toronto Branch

15,000.00

15,000.00

15,000.00

57. Canadian Multilingual Literacy Centre

9,400.00

23,400.00

9,400.00

58. Canadian National Institute for the Blind (CNIB)

51,668.00

58,000.00

51,668.00

59. Canadian Paraplegic Association Ontario

17,560.00

17,560.00

17,560.00

60. Canadian Red Cross Society - Metropolitan Toronto Region

23,916.00

50,916.00

23,916.00

61. Canadian Tamil Womens Community Services (CTW)

1,500.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
62. CANORA (Canadiens et Canadiennes d'origine africaine, antillaise et asiatique)

n/a

25,000.00

0.00

N
63. Caritas Project - Community Against Drugs

10,000.00

15,000.00

10,000.00

64. Catholic Cross Cultural Services

22,437.00

22,437.00

22,437.00

65. Cecil Community Centre

1,300.00

1,300.00

1,300.00

66. Central and Northern Etobicoke Home Support Services (CANES)

89,267.00

89,267.00

89,267.00

67. Central Eglinton Community Centre

18,310.00

14,101.00

14,101.00

SC
68. Central Neighbourhood House

162,096.00

173,096.00

162,854.00

EW/SC
69. Centres d'Accueil Heritage, Centres Des Pionniers, Les

52,568.00

55,000.00

52,568.00

70. Centre for Advancement in Work and Living

2,210.00

2,210.00

2,210.00

71. Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation

3,500.00

23,500.00

3,500.00

72. Centre for Independent Living in Toronto (C.I.L.T.)

2,625.00

9,400.00

2,625.00

73. Centre For Spanish-Speaking Peoples

31,552.00

31,552.00

31,552.00

74. Centre francophone du Toronto metropolitain/COFTM

28,778.00

28,778.00

28,778.00

75. Chalkfarm Community and Family Centre

21,500.00

108,424.00

95,924.00

MA/SC
76. Children's Storefront, The

30,198.00

30,198.00

30,198.00

77. Chinese Canadian National Council Toronto Chapter

2,500.00

3,000.00

2,500.00

78. Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto

n/a

62,000.00

0.00

N
79. Chinese Information and Community Services of Greater Toronto

54,502.00

73,000.00

54,502.00

80. Chinese Seniors Health and Recreation Association of Ontario

15,000.00

18,000.00

15,000.00

81. Chinese Seniors Support Services Association

29,495.00

46,000.00

29,495.00

82. Christie-Ossington Neighbourhood Centre

19,000.00

60,000.00

19,000.00

83. Circolo dell'Anziano "Le Caravelle"

8,800.00

n/a

n/a

MA
84. City of York Child and Family Centre

30,000.00

40,000.00

30,000.00

85. City of York Community and Agency Social Planning Council

81,158.00

n/a

n/a

MA
86. Cliffcrest Community Centre

13,950.00

13,950.00

13,950.00

87. Coalition of Visible Minority Women (Ontario) Inc.

3,150.00

4,000.00

3,150.00

88. College-Montrose Children's Place

26,700.00

29,700.00

24,700.00

89. Common Ground Women's Centre

15,000.00

20,000.00

15,000.00

90. Community Association for Riding for the Disabled

4,500.00

20,000.00

4,500.00

91. Community Bicycle Network

n/a

8,400.00

3,000.00

MA
92. Community Care East York

114,390.00

114,390.00

114,390.00

93. Community Centre 55

10,001.00

10,001.00

10,001.00

94. Community Information Centre for the City of York

52,700.00

65,450.00

52,700.00

95. Community Information Centre of Toronto

444,654.00

475,654.00

438,065.00

EW
96. Community Information Fairview

7,000.00

10,000.00

7,000.00

97. Community Occupational Therapists and Associates (COTA)

10,019.00

10,019.00

10,019.00

98. Community Resource Centre of Scarborough

500.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
99. Community Social Planning Council of Toronto

n/a

545,943.00

480,294.00

MA
100. Community Unity Alliance

2,500.00

5,000.00

2,500.00

101. ComServ Family Support Inc.

4,000.00

4,000.00

4,000.00

102. Conflict Mediation Services of Downsview

18,500.00

18,500.00

18,500.00

103. Connect Information Post

28,750.00

53,080.00

34,250.00

EW
104. Coping In Tough Times

18,000.00

18,000.00

18,000.00

105. COSTI-IIAS Immigrant Services

85,195.00

133,500.00

90,995.00

MA/SC
106. Council Fire Native Cultural Centre

35,286.00

53,050.00

35,286.00

107. Creating Together Parkdale

22,169.00

22,169.00

22,169.00

108. Creative and Natural Outdoor Experience (Project C.A.N.O.E. )

12,000.00

12,500.00

12,000.00

109. Crescent Town Community Association Inc.

22,500.00

22,500.00

22,500.00

110. Crime Concern/Neighbourhood Watch

75,000.00

75,000.00

75,000.00

111. Crime S.C.O.P.E. - Etobicoke

n/a

15,000.00

0.00

N
112. Cross Cultural Communication Centre

3,500.00

3,500.00

3,500.00

113. Cross Edge Community Network

n/a

20,000.00

0.00

N
114. Cultural & Sporting Organization Techino Mabto of Ecuador

2,000.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
115. Culturelink Settlement Services of Metro Toronto

5,000.00

6,000.00

5,000.00

116. D.A.R.E. Etobicoke

n/a

5,000.00

0.00

N
117. Davenport - Perth Neighbourhood Centre

44,050.00

66,900.00

66,900.00

SC
118. Day Care Connection (Toronto) Inc.

15,000.00

15,000.00

15,000.00

119. Day Centres and Visiting Services for Seniors of Etobicoke

60,710.00

70,900.00

60,710.00

120. Daystrom Family Resource Centre

49,688.00

n/a

n/a

MA
121. Deep Quong Non-Profit Homes

n/a

10,000.00

0.00

N
122. Dejinta Beesha

30,000.00

30,000.00

30,000.00

123. Delta Child Care Network of Ontario

29,300.00

32,000.00

29,300.00

124. Discoveries Child and Family Centre

100.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
125. Distress Centre

44,010.00

46,000.00

44,010.00

126. Dixon Hall Neighbourhood and Family Centre

123,958.00

137,910.00

117,316.00

SC
127. Dorothy Ley Hospice, The

5,000.00

5,000.00

5,000.00

128. Dovercourt Boys' and Girls' Club

21,925.00

20,965.00

10,963.00

SC
129. Downsview Services to Seniors Inc.

72,837.00

72,837.00

72,837.00

130. East End Children's Centre

25,775.00

26,400.00

25,775.00

131. East Metro Youth Services

n/a

78,185.00

15,000.00

N
132. East Scarborough Boys' and Girls' Club

72,058.00

69,583.00

60,455.00

SC
133. East Toronto Seniors Centre

13,000.00

13,000.00

13,000.00

134. East Toronto/East York Family Resources

21,950.00

35,000.00

21,950.00

135. East York Community Development Council

40,738.00

n/a

n/a

MA
136. East York Learning Experience

11,950.00

12,500.00

11,950.00

137. East York Meals on Wheels

23,556.00

23,556.00

23,556.00

138. Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre

61,840.00

54,640.00

54,640.00

SC
139. Economic Community Starting Centre

n/a

60,000.00

0.00

N
140. Elderly Vietnamese Association, The

14,378.00

15,500.00

14,378.00

141. Elizabeth Fry Society of Toronto

10,530.00

10,530.00

10,530.00

142. Elspeth Heyworth Centre for Women

7,000.00

14,000.00

7,000.00

143. Emily Stowe Shelter for Women

15,100.00

15,100.00

15,100.00

144. Epilepsy Association, Metro Toronto

30,020.00

30,020.00

30,020.00

145. Eritrean Canadian Community Centre of Metropolitan Toronto

2,000.00

20,000.00

2,000.00

146. Eritrean-Canadian Society for Youth Advancement

n/a

14,500.00

0.00

N
147. Ernestine's Women's Shelter

3,000.00

13,000.00

3,000.00

148. Ethiopian Association in Toronto

20,886.00

30,757.00

20,886.00

149. Etobicoke Crime Prevention Association

1,000.00

10,000.00

1,000.00

150. Etobicoke Family Life Education Council

21,700.00

21,700.00

21,700.00

151. Etobicoke North Community Information Centre

91,050.00

76,018.00

73,418.00

SC
152. Etobicoke Social Development Council

73,578.00

n/a

n/a

MA
153. Eva's Place - North York Emergency Home for Youth

10,000.00

40,000.00

10,000.00

154. Evangel Hall

12,000.00

15,000.00

12,000.00

155. Evergreen Senior Citizens' Association of Toronto

2,625.00

5,000.00

2,625.00

156. Extend-A-Family Toronto

1,000.00

4,000.00

1,000.00

157. Falstaff Community Service Organization

27,200.00

n/a

n/a

MA
158. Family Association for Mental Health Everywhere

1,000.00

2,000.00

1,000.00

159. Family Service Association of Metro Toronto

88,539.00

88,539.00

88,539.00

160. Federation of Italian Canadian Seniors

23,000.00

23,000.00

23,000.00

161. Finnish Social Counselling Service of Toronto Inc.

2,200.00

13,400.00

2,200.00

162. First Nations Day Committee

n/a

3,000.00

0.00

N
163. 519 Church Street Community Centre

54,841.00

94,091.00

63,389.00

EW/SC
164. Flemingdon Health Centre - The Flemingdon Newsletter

n/a

5,000.00

0.00

N
165. Flemingdon Neighbourhood Services

31,000.00

31,000.00

31,000.00

166. Flemingdon Youth Outreach

3,000.00

10,000.00

3,000.00

167. FoodShare Metro Toronto

45,978.00

45,978.00

45,978.00

168. For Youth Project

10,210.00

58,980.00

10,210.00

169. Four Seasons Connections

85,000.00

85,000.00

85,000.00

170. Fred Victor Centre

6,500.00

19,500.00

19,500.00

EW
171. Friends of Shopping Bag Ladies

26,224.00

26,224.00

24,224.00

172. G.R.A.N.D. Society

1,000.00

5,000.00

1,000.00

173. Gate to Success Counselling Services of Ontario

n/a

5,000.00

0.00

N
174. George S. Syme Seniors Centre of York

52,321.00

52,321.00

52,321.00

175. Gerrard Resource Centre

2,100.00

2,100.00

2,100.00

176. Good Neighbours' Club

53,600.00

53,600.00

53,600.00

177. Greek Community of Metropolitan Toronto Inc.

48,739.00

56,739.00

48,739.00

178. Harbourfront Community Centre

24,000.00

40,847.00

19,300.00

SC
179. Harmony Hall Centre For Seniors

40,788.00

41,533.00

40,788.00

180. Harriet Tubman Community Organization

17,500.00

40,000.00

17,500.00

181. Hellenic Home for the Aged Inc.

8,000.00

25,000.00

8,000.00

182. Heritage Skills Development Centre

6,000.00

125,000.00

6,000.00

183. Hispanic Community Centre for City of York

25,000.00

25,000.00

25,000.00

184. Homes First Society

15,000.00

105,000.00

45,000.00

EW
185. Homeward Family Shelter

12,000.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
186. Hong Fook Mental Health Association

1,000.00

3,000.00

1,000.00

187. Horizons for Youth

23,000.00

29,000.00

29,000.00

EW
188. Horseed Youth Club

n/a

11,800.00

0.00

N
189. Hospice Scarborough

500.00

10,000.00

500.00

190. Hospital Special Needs Incorporated

18,025.00

18,025.00

18,025.00

191. Houselink Community Homes

11,751.00

11,751.00

11,751.00

192. Human Services Of Scarborough

89,908.00

n/a

n/a

MA
193. Hungarian-Canadian Community Services

5,000.00

7,000.00

5,000.00

194. INTERCEDE for the Rights of Domestic Workers, Caregivers and Newcomers

22,400.00

26,000.00

22,400.00

195. Iranian Community Advisory Committee

(Trustee: Family Services Association)

n/a

7,280.00

5,000.00

N
196. Iranian Community Association of Ontario

14,378.00

35,678.00

14,378.00

197. Iraqi Canadian Society of Ontario, The

3,000.00

4,500.00

0.00

198. Islington Centre-Etobicoke Senior Citizens

29,515.00

29,515.00

29,515.00

199. Jamaican Canadian Association

32,000.00

58,000.00

25,500.00

SC
200. Jane Finch Adult Education and Training Centre

1,500.00

5,000.00

0.00

201. Jane/Finch Community and Family Centre

88,419.00

176,919.00

88,419.00

202. Japanese Family Services of Toronto

17,000.00

25,000.00

17,000.00

203. Jessie's Centre for Teenagers

15,000.00

16,500.00

15,000.00

204. Jewish Camp Council of Toronto

25,000.00

25,000.00

25,000.00

205. Jewish Immigrant Aid Services of Canada

n/a

24,500.00

0.00

N
206. Jewish Information Service of the UJA Federation

10,100.00

10,300.00

10,100.00

207. John Howard Society of Metropolitan Toronto

11,500.00

11,500.00

11,500.00

208. Just for Today Alcohol and Drug Awareness Centre

800.00

13,000.00

800.00

209. Kababayan Community Services Centre Inc.

24,400.00

24,400.00

24,400.00

210. Kensington Youth Theatre & Employment Skills

8,600.00

28,600.00

8,600.00

211. Korean Canadian Women's Association

20,000.00

20,000.00

20,000.00

212. Korean Senior Citizens' Society of Toronto

14,735.00

16,000.00

14,735.00

213. La Casa Dona Juana

12,000.00

12,000.00

12,000.00

214. Lakeshore Area Multi-Service Project (LAMP)

38,239.00

47,000.00

38,239.00

215. Lakeshore Parent/Child Centre Inc.

24,243.00

n/a

n/a

MA
216. Lakeshore Village Neighbourhood Assoc.

1,100.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
217. Landlord's Self-Help Centre

5,000.00

8,000.00

5,000.00

218. Lao Association of Ontario

13,293.00

26,586.00

13,293.00

219. Latvian Senior Citizens' Association in Metro Toronto

4,000.00

4,000.00

4,000.00

220. Lawrence Heights Area Alliance

16,880.00

21,880.00

16,880.00

221. Le Groupe Jeunesse Francophone De Toronto

1,100.00

5,000.00

1,100.00

222. Le Regroupement des Jeunes Filles Francophones

1,100.00

5,500.00

1,100.00

223. Learning Disabilities Association of North York

5,000.00

7,500.00

5,000.00

224. Learning Disabilities Association of Ontario

5,000.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
225. Learning Disabilities Association of Toronto

7,100.00

9,600.00

7,100.00

226. Learning Enrichment Foundation

20,000.00

35,000.00

20,000.00

227. Lesbian Gay Bi Youth Line

3,000.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
228. Loyola Arrupe Centre for Seniors

14,280.00

19,000.00

14,280.00

229. Macaulay Child Development Centre

16,333.00

16,333.00

16,333.00

230. Malvern Family Resource Centre

44,800.00

50,000.00

44,800.00

231. Malvern Youth Club

n/a

32,500.00

0.00

N
232. Marvin Morten Centre

500.00

100,000.00

0.00

233. Massey Centre for Women

23,300.00

23,300.00

23,300.00

234. Meals Here and There Inc.

17,819.00

17,819.00

17,819.00

235. Meals on Wheels and More

32,653.00

32,653.00

32,653.00

236. Mennonite New Life Centre of Toronto

3,000.00

3,000.00

3,000.00

237. Mens Sana (Families for Schizophrenics)

3,000.00

20,000.00

3,000.00

238. Meta Centre for the Developmentally Challenged

3,000.00

17,200.00

3,000.00

239. Metro Association of Family Resource Programs

n/a

37,000.00

0.00

N
240. Metro Mothers Network

3,500.00

3,500.00

3,500.00

241. Metro Street Focus

n/a

200,000.00

0.00

N
242. Metro Toronto Action Committee on Public Violence Against Women and Children

241,425.00

241,425.00

219,770.00

243. Metro Youth Council

(Trustee: 761 Community Development Corporation)

50,000.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

244. Mid Toronto Community Services

120,314.00

120,314.00

120,314.00

245. Midaynta (Association of Somali Service Agencies)

n/a

158,556.00

15,000.00

N
246. Mobile Family Resource Program

(Trustee: East York/East Toronto Family Resources)

n/a

30,000.00

15,000.00

N
247. Momiji Health Care Society

12,800.00

12,800.00

12,800.00

248. Mood Disorders Association of Metro Toronto

1,200.00

1,200.00

1,200.00

249. More Than Child's Play

22,400.00

22,400.00

22,400.00

250. Multiple Sclerosis Access Support Association

n/a

6,800.00

0.00

N
251. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Association Ontario

2,000.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
252. National Congress of Italian Canadians

6,250.00

9,100.00

4,100.00

253. National Council of Jewish Women of Canada

23,000.00

23,000.00

23,000.00

254. Native African Inmates and Families Association

1,500.00

25,500.00

1,500.00

255. Native Canadian Centre of Toronto

59,857.00

59,857.00

59,857.00

256. Native Child and Family Services of Toronto

52,000.00

64,000.00

36,000.00

SC
257. Native Mens Residence (Na-Me-Res)

10,000.00

14,000.00

14,000.00

EW
258. Native Womens Resource Centre of Toronto

21,000.00

29,000.00

21,000.00

259. Neighbourhood Information Centre

19,770.00

20,260.00

19,770.00

260. Neighbourhood Information Post

34,484.00

34,484.00

34,484.00

261. Neighbourhood Link

4,000.00

33,000.00

4,000.00

262. Neighbourhood Resource Centres of Scarborough

39,788.00

39,788.00

39,788.00

263. Neighbourhood Watch Scarborough

1,500.00

1,500.00

1,500.00

264. New Directions

19,370.00

21,500.00

19,370.00

265. New Experiences for Latin American Refugee Women

23,000.00

23,000.00

23,000.00

266. New Horizon Day Centre

7,450.00

7,450.00

7,450.00

267. Next Door Child Care

1,140.00

n/a

n/a

MA
268. Next Door Family Resources

n/a

37,682.00

37,682.00

MA
269. North York Association for Educational Enrichment

n/a

12,000.00

4,000.00

N
270. North York Block Parents

n/a

1,200.00

1,000.00

N
271. North York Community House

29,000.00

50,000.00

29,000.00

272. North York Falls Coalition

n/a

4,000.00

0.00

N
273. North York Harvest Food Bank

10,000.00

15,000.00

10,000.00

274. North York Inter-Agency and Community Council

59,908.00

n/a

n/a

MA
275. North York Seniors Centre

77,806.00

77,806.00

77,806.00

276. North York Seniors Peer Counselling

n/a

30,000.00

4,000.00

N
277. North York Women's Centre

19,963.00

25,000.00

19,963.00

278. North York Women's Shelter

14,000.00

14,000.00

14,000.00

279. Northwood Neighbourhood Services

24,000.00

36,000.00

24,000.00

280. O'Connor Focus Community Against Substance Abuse

2,000.00

14,000.00

2,000.00

281. Ogaden Somali Community Association of Ontario

2,000.00

10,000.00

2,000.00

282. Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants (OCASI)

7,375.00

20,000.00

7,375.00

283. Oolagen Community Services

n/a

90,000.00

0.00

N
284. Open Door Centre and Rooms Registry Service Inc.

104,000.00

158,400.00

114,000.00

EW
285. Operation Economic Concern

1,000.00

1,000.00

0.00

286. Opportunity for Advancement

9,956.00

9,956.00

9,956.00

287. Oriole Community Services Association

32,120.00

50,000.00

32,120.00

288. Oromo Canadian Community Association of Ontario

26,000.00

28,000.00

26,000.00

289. P.O.I.N.T. Inc.

8,150.00

8,150.00

8,150.00

290. Pais & Filhos Coalition

6,000.00

50,000.00

6,000.00

291. PAL-Reading Services Inc.

13,295.00

17,700.00

13,295.00

292. Parent Resources-Family Resource Programmes

n/a

40,000.00

15,000.00

N
293. Parents Network

2,205.00

2,600.00

2,205.00

294. Parents, Families & Friends of Lesbians & Gays

3,000.00

3,000.00

3,000.00

295. Parkdale Activity & Recreation Centre (PARC)

21,500.00

101,100.00

36,500.00

EW
296. Parkdale Community Health Centre

2,000.00

6,000.00

6,000.00

EW
297. Parkdale Community Information Centre

23,165.00

23,165.00

23,165.00

298. Parkdale Golden Age Foundation

39,448.00

39,448.00

39,448.00

299. Parkdale Intercultural Association

1,200.00

10,000.00

1,200.00

300. Parkdale Project Read

14,440.00

14,440.00

14,440.00

301. Pat Arato Aphasia Centre

9,000.00

22,000.00

9,000.00

302. Pine Tree Senior Centre of Scarborough Inc.

16,400.00

16,400.00

16,400.00

303. Polish Immigrant and Community Services

29,270.00

24,886.00

24,886.00

SC
304. Portuguese Interagency Network

9,000.00

9,000.00

9,000.00

305. Portuguese Social Service Centre of Toronto

23,799.00

23,799.00

23,799.00

306. Portuguese Women 55+

4,400.00

4,500.00

4,400.00

307. Positive Straight Men Counselling Services Inc.

12,500.00

15,000.00

12,500.00

308. Project Work

6,625.00

8,000.00

6,625.00

309. Ralph Thornton Centre

5,300.00

n/a

n/a

SC
310. Reena

15,000.00

15,000.00

7,500.00

311. Refugees and Immigrants Information Centre Toronto Inc.

n/a

150,000.00

0.00

N
312. Rexdale Community Microskills Development Centre

15,000.00

15,000.00

15,000.00

313. Rexdale Ecumenical Social Action

2,000.00

2,000.00

2,000.00

314. Rexdale Women's Centre

29,819.00

29,819.00

29,819.00

315. Riverdale Immigrant Women's Centre

34,313.00

34,313.00

34,313.00

316. Sahara Charitable Organization

n/a

38,500.00

0.00

N
317. Scadding Court Community Centre

9,454.00

13,542.00

7,210.00

SC
318. Scarborough Crossroads Family Resource Centre

(Trustee: Agincourt Community Services Association)

19,000.00

28,000.00

19,000.00

319. Scarborough Distress Centre

26,000.00

26,000.00

26,000.00

320. Scarborough Housing Help Centre

700.00

2,000.00

700.00

321. Scarborough Support Services for the Elderly

64,163.00

64,163.00

64,163.00

322. Scarborough Women's Centre

27,000.00

30,000.00

27,000.00

323. Second Base (Scarborough) Youth Shelter

9,250.00

63,750.00

16,750.00

EW
324. Second Mile Club of Toronto

73,905.00

75,000.00

73,905.00

325. Self-Help Resource Centre of Greater Toronto

13,000.00

13,000.00

13,000.00

326. Senior Adult Services

18,970.00

21,970.00

18,970.00

327. Senior Care

84,218.00

84,218.00

84,218.00

328. Senior Link

107,151.00

107,151.00

107,151.00

329. Senior Peoples' Resources in North Toronto

119,054.00

122,210.00

119,054.00

330. Senior Tamils Centre

10,000.00

18,000.00

10,000.00

331. 761 Community Development Corporation

n/a

181,050.00

10,000.00

N
332. Shoot for the Stars

n/a

30,000.00

0.00

N
333. Sikh Youth and Family Resource Centre

n/a

13,500.00

0.00

N
334. Silayan Filipino Community Centre

n/a

20,000.00

0.00

N
335. Silent Voice Canada Inc.

21,973.00

20,673.00

16,673.00

SC
336. Sistering - A Woman's Place

77,157.00

82,883.00

82,157.00

EW
337. SIWA - Somali Immigrant Women Association

n/a

131,822.00

5,000.00

N
338. Skills for Change of Metro Toronto

n/a

1,500.00

n/a

NA
339. Slovenian Linden Foundation (Dom Lipa)

7,000.00

7,000.00

7,000.00

340. Social Planning Council of Metro Toronto

135,004.00

n/a

n/a

MA
341. Society of Portuguese Disabled Persons

1,500.00

1,500.00

1,500.00

342. Society of Sharing: Inner-City Volunteers

13,800.00

13,800.00

13,800.00

343. Sojourn House

3,500.00

5,000.00

3,500.00

344. Somali Canadian Association of Etobicoke

17,886.00

27,446.00

17,886.00

345. Somali Immigrant Aid Organization

16,600.00

40,000.00

16,600.00

346. Somali Women and Children's Support Network

4,000.00

14,000.00

4,000.00

347. Somali Youth Club

n/a

90,000.00

0.00

N
348. Somaliland Women's Organization

300.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
349. South Asian Family Support Services

23,500.00

30,000.00

23,500.00

350. South Asian Women's Centre

22,800.00

22,800.00

22,800.00

351. South East Asian Services Centre

16,999.00

18,091.00

16,999.00

352. South Riverdale Child Parent Centre

26,521.00

27,715.00

26,521.00

353. Sparroways Children's Program

1,000.00

1,500.00

1,000.00

354. St. Alban's Boys' and Girls' Club

13,671.00

15,000.00

13,671.00

355. St. Bernadette's Family Resource Centre

19,000.00

30,000.00

19,000.00

356. St. Christopher House

263,635.00

298,735.00

272,035.00

EW/SC
357. St. Clair O'Connor Community Inc.

15,319.00

15,319.00

15,319.00

358. St. Clair West Services for Seniors, Inc.

55,292.00

55,292.00

55,292.00

359. St. David's Village Senior Citizen Residence

4,000.00

4,033.00

n/a

WA
360. St. George's Adult Literacy

1,200.00

1,200.00

1,200.00

361. St. Matthew's Bracondale House

12,626.00

12,626.00

12,626.00

362. St. Paul's L'Amoreaux Seniors' Centre

109,488.00

109,488.00

109,488.00

363. St. Stephen's Community House

166,170.00

178,170.00

173,778.00

EW/SC
364. Stonegate Community Health Centre

14,000.00

14,000.00

14,000.00

365. Stonegate Drop-In Centre

12,299.00

n/a

n/a

MA
366. Stop 103 Inc.

10,000.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

367. Storefront Humber Inc.

63,138.00

86,175.00

63,138.00

368. Street Haven At the Crossroads

14,250.00

42,750.00

22,750.00

EW
369. Street Health Community Nursing Foundation

2,250.00

36,750.00

6,750.00

EW
370. Student Assistance in North Toronto for Seniors

9,899.00

10,399.00

9,899.00

371. Sunshine Centres For Seniors

26,502.00

26,502.00

26,502.00

372. Swansea Mews Residents Group

10,000.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
373. Syme-Woolner Neighbourhood and Family Centre

72,525.00

101,750.00

81,025.00

EW
374. Tamil Eelam Society of Canada

21,000.00

32,982.00

21,000.00

375. Tamil Resource Centre

2,348.00

7,000.00

2,348.00

376. Taylor Place Senior Adult Centre

77,611.00

77,611.00

77,611.00

377. Tea-at-Two/Chai Tikvak Foundation

n/a

2,315.00

0.00

N
378. Tel-Aide, Jewish Distress Line

1,000.00

3,000.00

1,000.00

379. Telecare Distress Centre Etobicoke

26,860.00

26,860.00

26,860.00

380. Teresa Group, The

n/a

83,968.00

15,000.00

N
381. Thadeus Human Support and Development

n/a

15,000.00

0.00

N
382. Thistletown Community Breakfast Club

(Trustee: Etobicoke North Community Information Centre)

2,000.00

2,000.00

2,000.00

383. Thistletown Community Services Unit

17,400.00

17,400.00

17,400.00

384. Thistletown Teen Centre

n/a

139,792.00

0.00

N
385. Thorncliffe Neighbourhood Office

22,220.00

22,220.00

22,220.00

386. Tigrayan Association in Toronto

2,000.00

7,000.00

2,000.00

387. Times Change Women's Employment Services

5,100.00

5,100.00

5,100.00

388. Toronto Adult Literacy for Action Centre

16,800.00

16,800.00

16,800.00

389. Toronto and Central Ontario Regional Hemophilia Society

30,089.00

31,000.00

30,089.00

390. Toronto Child Abuse Centre

235,681.00

235,680.00

223,897.00

391. Toronto Children's Breakfast Club

15,000.00

36,000.00

15,000.00

392. Toronto Chinese Community Services Association

22,660.00

22,660.00

22,660.00

393. Toronto Christian Resource Centre

44,839.00

54,500.00

49,839.00

EW
394. Toronto Citizen Advocacy

3,870.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
395. Toronto Community Training & Social Services

3,000.00

10,000.00

3,000.00

396. Toronto East End Literacy Project

12,835.00

12,835.00

12,835.00

397. Toronto Finnish-Canadian Seniors' Centre Inc.

14,791.00

15,000.00

14,791.00

398. Toronto Friendship Centre Inc.

83,593.00

110,000.00

83,593.00

399. Toronto Intergenerational Partnerships

17,000.00

23,200.00

17,000.00

400. Toronto Kiwanis Boys and Girls Club

19,504.00

n/a

n/a

SC
401. Toronto Kurdish Community & Information Centre

2,000.00

24,000.00

2,000.00

402. Toronto Mainland Chinese Community Centre

3,000.00

47,000.00

3,000.00

403. Toronto People with AIDS Foundation

27,130.00

27,130.00

27,130.00

404. Toronto Rape Crisis Centre

36,125.00

37,500.00

36,125.00

405. Toronto Tamil Youth Support Services

n/a

20,000.00

3,000.00

N
406. Touchstone Youth Centre

11,750.00

36,250.00

19,250.00

EW
407. Travellers Aid Society of Toronto

2,135.00

2,135.00

2,135.00

408. Treasure House Ministry

n/a

50,000.00

0.00

N
409. Tropicana Community Services Organization

30,000.00

28,500.00

25,400.00

SC
410. True Davidson Meals on Wheels (East York) Inc.

18,995.00

18,995.00

18,995.00

411. Ukrainian Canadian Social Services (Toronto) Inc.

33,021.00

40,000.00

33,021.00

412. Unemployed Professional African Watu (Women & Men) Association

2,000.00

50,000.00

0.00

413. Union of Injured Workers

26,754.00

26,754.00

26,754.00

414. United Italians Cultural Club

2,500.00

4,800.00

0.00

415. United Oromo Canadian Society of Ontario

n/a

60,000.00

0.00

N
416. University Settlement Recreation Centre

56,559.00

53,659.00

53,659.00

SC
417. Urban Alliance on Race Relations

7,600.00

8,000.00

7,600.00

418. Vermont Square Parent-Child Mother Goose Program

22,389.00

22,389.00

22,389.00

419. Victim Services

112,000.00

162,000.00

162,000.00

420. Victoria Park Seniors Club

2,000.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
421. Vietnamese Association of Toronto

n/a

4,000.00

4,000.00

N
422. Vietnamese Community of North York & Vicinity

2,000.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
423. Vietnamese Greater Toronto Interlink Services

3,150.00

3,755.00

2,400.00

424. Vietnamese Women's Association of Toronto

3,000.00

10,628.00

3,000.00

425. Vietnamese Youth Centre of Toronto

n/a

20,000.00

0.00

N
426. Villa Charities Inc.

3,000.00

3,000.00

3,000.00

427. Villa Colombo Homes for the Aged

34,122.00

39,000.00

34,122.00

428. Villaways Community Association

10,000.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
429. Volunteer Centre of Metropolitan Toronto

158,248.00

161,748.00

158,248.00

430. Volunteers Etobicoke

25,400.00

25,400.00

25,400.00

431. Warden Woods Church and Community Centre

137,121.00

137,121.00

137,121.00

432. Welcome Baby Support Program for Etobicoke

18,415.00

20,000.00

18,415.00

433. Welfare Committee for the Assyrian Community in Canada

500.00

20,000.00

500.00

434. West Hill Community Services

85,889.00

121,376.00

94,389.00

EW
435. West Indian Volunteer Community Support Services

21,210.00

47,000.00

19,210.00

SC
436. West Rouge Canoe Club

n/a

100,000.00

0.00

N
437. West Scarborough Neighbourhood Community Centre

157,639.00

148,351.00

148,351.00

SC
438. West Toronto Support Services for the Elderly and Disabled

70,178.00

70,178.00

70,178.00

439. Westenders Professional Development Committee

1,500.00

n/a

n/a

DNR
440. Weston Seniors Club 132

1,000.00

1,000.00

1,000.00

441. Wexford Centre

17,900.00

17,900.00

17,900.00

442. Whyy Mee Family Counselling

1,050.00

5,000.00

1,050.00

443. Willowridge Information and Recreation Centre

35,034.00

45,500.00

30,534.00

SC
444. Willowtree Tenant's Organization

16,000.00

16,000.00

16,000.00

445. Windfall Clothing Services

2,000.00

2,000.00

2,000.00

446. Women Working with Immigrant Women

2,800.00

3,000.00

2,800.00

447. Women's Counselling Referral & Education Centre (W.C.R.E.C.)

24,500.00

24,500.00

24,500.00

448. Women's Habitat for Etobicoke

7,460.00

7,760.00

7,460.00

449. WoodGreen Community Centre of Toronto

218,569.00

212,810.00

212,810.00

SC
450. Woodgreen Towers Services

15,208.00

15,208.00

15,208.00

451. Working Skills Centre

1,575.00

1,575.00

1,575.00

452. Working Women Community Centre

29,800.00

35,500.00

29,800.00

453. Workshop on Wheels Committee

2,000.00

n/a

n/a

MA
454. Wychwood Open Door

30,900.00

30,900.00

30,900.00

455. Yee Hong Centre for Geriatric Care

20,000.00

19,426.00

19,426.00

456. Y.M.C.A. of Greater Toronto

94,766.00

263,420.00

94,766.00

457. York Community Services

26,420.00

38,420.00

26,420.00

458. York West Meals on Wheels Inc.

51,516.00

51,516.00

51,516.00

459. York West Senior Citizens Centre

64,000.00

82,600.00

64,000.00

460. York Youth Connection

6,700.00

n/a

n/a

SC
461. York-Fairbank Centre for Seniors

85,241.00

94,000.00

85,241.00

462. Yorkgate Community Information Centre

2,000.00

5,000.00

2,000.00

463. Yorkminister Park Meals on Wheels

7,733.00

7,733.00

7,733.00

464. Youth Assisting Youth

38,274.00

54,474.00

38,274.00

465. Youth Clinical Services

25,000.00

25,000.00

25,000.00

466. Youth Without Shelter

10,500.00

28,500.00

16,500.00

EW
467. Youthlink (Inner City & Scarborough)

109,703.00

109,703.00

109,703.00

468. Zainab's Place

n/a

25,500.00

0.00

N
469. Zorastrian Society of Ontario

2,000.00

5,300.00

2,000.00

Grand Total:

$11,957,908.00

$17,514,177.00

$11,947,891.00

Emergency Support Fund:

264,509.00

Appeals Fund:

40,000.00

Total:

$12,252,400.00

Directory:

N = New ApplicantT = Transfer

WA = Withdrew ApplicationNA = Not Accepted

DNR = Did Not ReapplyEW = Emergency Support Fund Winter Allocation

MA = Merged AgencySC = Summer Camp

(A copy of each of the Appendices B and C, referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda of the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on June 1, 1998, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

--------

(Report dated June 9, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee, from the

Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)

Purpose:

This report presents the recommended allocations from the $40,000.00 Community Services grants program appeal fund for the agencies which appealed to the Municipal Grants Review Committee for reconsideration.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

The 1998 approved estimates provide for $11,987,891.00 for the Community Services Grants Program. Municipal Grants Review Committee received a report, entitled "Community Service Grants Program - 1998 Allocations" on May 20, 1998, which recommended the allocation of $11,947,891.00 to 386 agencies. An amount of $40,000.00 was reserved to respond to agency appeals.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the appeal fund of $40,000.00 be allocated to: the For Youth project ($26,000.00); the Metro Association of Family Resource Program ($10,000.00); The Broad African Resource Centre ($3,000.00) and SIWA- Somali Immigrant Women Association ($1,000.00); and

(2)the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

Under the general authority for making municipal grants provided in Section 113 (1) of the Municipal Act, all of the former municipalities provided support to the non-profit sector through community service grants. The 1998 Community Service Grants represents a combination of ten existing grants program provided by the seven former municipalities as the primary means of municipal support for community-based agencies.

On May 20, 1998, the Municipal Grants Review Committee received a report, entitled "Community Service Grants Programs - 1998 Allocations", which recommended allocations totalling $11,947,891.00 for 386 agencies.

Fifty organizations provided a written and/or verbal presentation to the Municipal Grants Review Committee regarding either the amount of funding recommended to their agency, conditions placed on the grant, the fact that they were not recommended for funding, or the support provided by other levels of government.

In developing recommendations with regard to how the appeal funds could best be allocated, staff reviewed the original recommendations and considered the information presented in the deputations. A total of $40,000.00 is available for the 1998 Community Service Grants Programs Appeals.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

Of the 50 organizations which appealed their allocations, 21 were new applicants not recommended for support, two were new applicants recommended for a grant, but appealing the amount, and the remaining 27 were returning agencies. Of the returning agencies, one agency was recommended for a reduced allocation, and 26 for a flatline allocation. Nine agencies have conditions on their 1998 grant and six agencies have future funding conditions.

The overall approach used in assessing the appeals was consistent with directions outlined in the May20,1998, report, "Community Service Grants Programs - 1998 Allocations" and as outlined in the "Administration of Municipal Grants" report approved by Council on February4,5,and6,1998, which were to provide flatline allocations for returning agencies that do not have identified performance issues, and to consider new applicants.

As a result, staff are recommending that the direction not to undertake redistribution in the 1998 transition year be maintained. In the absence of a new grants program design, a fair and equitable basis from which to recommend increases to some applicants and not to others does not exist. Funds made available through the appeals fund have been recommended to eligible new applicants or to redress confusion through the amalgamation of the new City and to return the agency appealing to their 1997 funding base. The principles of equitable access to grants, agency effectiveness and efficiency, community needs and available resources were considered in the review of new applicants.

Staff have considered the direction from the Municipal Grants Committee meeting of June 1,1998, regarding the need for funding with respect to the issues of homelessness, children and youth programs. Further to the issue for the need for funding in these sectors, the report of May20,1998, entitled "Community Service Grants Program - 1998 Allocations", recommends that a number of issues be looked at through the service review, including the impact of grants as a tool to address the needs of communities. As well, the report of May20, 1998, recommended that an amount of $264,509.00 be allocated in September 1998 for Emergency Support Fund winter allocations for services to the homeless and underhoused.

New Agencies:

New agencies that were not recommended, were determined to be ineligible as they had not yet developed the required organizational systems and structures, or did not demonstrate the required level of performance through the interview and review process. One agency was not recommended because it does not have a social service mandate and has considerable capacity to raise funds through donations, user fees, grants and productive enterprises. Another agency was not recommended because it requested funds for activities which are eligible for funding under established funding programs provided by senior levels of government.

Based on the information provided during the deputations and a review of agency applications, staff have confirmed the original recommendations regarding agencies which have not yet developed the required organizational systems and structures. These agencies will be invited to attend organizational development workshops provided by the Community Resources Unit of the Social Development and Management Services Division. In addition, staff are meeting with other funders to identify possible supports to assist agencies during their developmental stage and, where appropriate, to encourage agency co-ordination/collaboration.

Based on the deputations and Committee input regarding the City's priority for children's programs, one new applicant was recommended for additional funds through the appeals fund. Two new applicants that were already recommended for funding in the May 20, 1998, report, and made deputations have been recommended for increased allocations through the appeals fund. These two organizations are ethno-specific organizations and are assisting communities at risk, including children and youth.

Returning Applicants:

As indicated above, staff have confirmed the direction to flatline allocations in 1998. Of the 15agencies appealing a flatline allocation, one agency's initial recommendation (For Youth Project) has been reconsidered and revised, returning the agency to its actual 1997 funding base.

One agency who appealed, the Toronto Child Abuse Centre, had received an initial recommendation for a decreased allocation. Grants staff identified the need for the agency to reduce its reliance on the municipality and recommended funding the agency at a level which maintains it at the same rate of dependency as its 1997 grant. A flat-line allocation would result in an increased dependency. Staff have reviewed the materials and deputation comments provided by the agency and have confirmed the initial recommendation.

As well, deputations by agencies covered a range of concerns related to: conditions or comments placed on agencies; portions of the agency grant going to restructuring costs; funding for summer student programming costs; and the loss of in-kind contributions from other municipal departments.

The Bob Rumball Centre for the Deaf made a deputation related to a 1998 grant condition regarding the membership and Board structure of its organization. In 1998, several agencies were required to develop a membership and board recruitment strategy which includes a review of the agency's by-laws, an analysis of the community to which the agency is accountable, the development of membership targets which ensure accountability to this community and an implementation plan. The Metro Community Resources Fund (C.R.F.) eligibility criteria for agencies receiving a grant states that agencies must have a voluntary, democratically-elected Board of Directors or Advisory Committee that is representative of the communities served, must be accessible to the community, and ensure that there are appropriate means of ensuring community input and control in decision-making. Staff have reviewed the materials and deputation comments provided by the agency at appeal and have revised the condition as outlined in the Appendix.

The Ethiopian Association in Toronto Inc. made a deputation related to a condition on the 1998 grant that the agency must secure an acceptable trustee to manage the municipal grant. Staff have reviewed the materials and deputation comments provided by the agency at appeal and have communicated with the federal and provincial funders of the agency. Other levels of government are concerned about the financial management capabilities of this organization and will be meeting with City staff shortly. Staff have confirmed the initial recommended condition.

Coping in Tough Times, made a deputation related to a condition on their 1998 grant that the agency must secure another organization to manage and operate the budget counselling programs. Staff have reviewed the materials and deputation comments provided by the agency at appeal and the history of recommendations made to the agency under the former Metro Community Resources Fund regarding the necessity for the agency to review its long-term viability and to initiate restructuring discussions with other service providers. Staff have confirmed the initial recommendation.

Conditions attached to Friends of Shopping Bag Ladies (416 Drop-in Centre) required the agency to make the necessary changes to return to operating as a women's only drop-in program by August14,1998. This issue was identified by staff during the 1997 review process, and the former Metro Human Services Committee expressly directed that a process be undertaken to move male clients to other services. Staff have reviewed the materials and deputation comments provided by the agency at appeal and the history of recommendations made to the agency under the former Metro Community Resources Fund regarding the necessity for the agency to resolve the issue of redirecting male clients to other services. Staff are recommending that the agency develop a system to refer male clients to other service providers. This should include the agency meeting regularly with other agencies providing services to homeless men and developing a systems which documents the process of referral and when service is accessed or denied. The referral system needs to be operationalized by August of 1998. Staff have revised the condition as outlined in the Appendix.

Four of the deputations/communications were made regarding the 1998 grant conditions and future funding conditions placed on the Open Door Centre and Rooms Registry Inc. and the Toronto Friendship Centre. The deputants were concerned that the recommendations required the two agencies to restructure and that $5,000.00 from each allocation was being held to address potential restructuring costs. Staff have reviewed the materials and deputation comments provided by the agency at appeal and the history of recommendations made to the agency under the former Metro Community Resources Fund regarding the necessity for the agency to resolve issues of financial viability and the need to restructure. Staff have confirmed the recommendation to restructure.

Staff have already begun meeting with the two agencies and will continue meeting with them over the next two weeks to formalize the restructuring discussions and draft the terms of reference. With regard to the use of $5,000.00 from the Metro C.R.F. toward costs related to the merger, staff are now recommending that the 1998 grants go to the provision of the drop-in programs, and that an additional $5,000.00 be given to each agency from the Contingency Fund towards costs related to restructuring if required.

St. Bernadette's Family Resource Centre, requested additional funds because of an increasing need for resources to cover the costs of summer student programming. Staff have reviewed the materials and deputation comments provided by the agency at appeal. Staff confirm their recommendation. However, staff will report to Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee and the Municipal Grants Review Committee regarding supports to agencies for summer student programming at a later date.

Thistletown Teen Centre requested funds in order to meet the needs of youth in the Rexdale area of the former City of Etobicoke. Staff have reviewed the materials and deputation comments provided by the agency at appeal. Staff confirm their recommendation. However, staff will initiate discussions with the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism and report back at a later date.

The Y.M.C.A. of Greater Toronto, Etobicoke Youth Centre requested in-kind supports of $3,500.00 from the Recreation Department be continued as in the previous year. Staff have reviewed the materials and deputation comments provided by the agency at appeal. Staff confirm their recommendation. However staff will initiate discussions with the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism and report back at a later date.

Two agencies, Chalkfarm Community and Family Centre and Malvern Family Resource Centre, made appeals regarding their allocations on the basis of the need for service in their catchment areas and the variability of funding levels across the City. Staff identified these issues in the May20,1998, report, "CommunityServiceGrantsProgram -1998Allocations", as appropriate issues for the service area review. Through the review, the City as a funder needs to assess how it can improve its ability to determine the effectiveness and impact of grants as a tool to address the needs of communities and what mechanisms and policies are needed to facilitate the redistribution of the resources within the Community Service Grants Program. Staff confirm their recommendations.

Conclusions:

Based on reviews of the information presented through the deputations, staff are recommending: that one new applicant receive funding through the appeals fund; that two new applicants already recommended for funding receive additional funds through the appeals fund; that one returning applicant receive their 1997 flat-line allocation and the additional funds be taken from the appeals fund; that two agencies' grants be allocated for the provision of service and that no portion of the grant be used for restructuring, and that two agencies' conditions be revised.

Contact Name:

Chris Brillinger, Tel: 392-8608/Fax: 392-8492,

E-mail address: chris_brillinger@metrodesk.metrotor.on.ca

--------

Appendix 1

(1)After School Program (Grant No.9):

The agency serves youth and parents in the northern area of the former City of Etobicoke. They provide after school programs for youth, and a weekly Friday evening social and recreational program for youth and their parents. They provide parenting education workshops and informal counselling and referral. In 1997, 100 individuals were served by 10 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(2)Agincourt Community Services Association (Grant No. 10):

The agency serves the area bounded by Highway 401, Steeles Avenue, Markham Road and Victoria Park (the Information Centre serves all of the former City of Scarborough). The agency provides information and referral, and community services which include emergency food, a food bank alternatives program, a clothing depot, income tax and legal clinics, transportation, shopping trips and friendly visiting. In 1997, 20,891 individuals were served by a staff of 5.70 full-time equivalents and 234 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(3)Applegrove Community Complex (Grant No. 20):

The organization serves residents in the area bounded by Lake Ontario, Gerrard Street, Jones Avenue and Woodbine Avenue. The agency's programs include youth services such as social/recreational activities, informal counselling, an after-school program, a drop-in program for seniors and two parent/child drop-in centres. In 1997, 1,338 individuals were served by a staff of 6.75 full-time equivalents and 174 volunteers.

Comment:

The agency is also recommended for a 1998 grant from the Recreation Grants program for $2,500.00 and receives City funding as an Association of City Funded Centre (AOCC). Staff will report to Community and Neighbourhood Services Committee and the Municipal Grants Review Committee at a later date regarding supports to agencies for summer student programming.

(4)Asian Canadian Support Centre (Grant No. 23):

The agency serves residents in the former Cities of North York and Etobicoke at an office in the Jane/Finch area. They provide services to foster the development of the Asian community such as locally based orientation programs, an information referral service and outreach programs. In 1997, 1600 individuals were served by 22 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(5)Bloor Information And Life Skills Centre (Grant No. 38):

The agency serves residents within the area bounded by St. Clair Avenue, College Street, Avenue Road and Lansdowne Avenue. Services include information and referral, legal aid, and direct social services such as counselling, crisis intervention, income tax clinics, interpretation, translation, and home visits. In 1997, 5,840 individuals were served by a staff of 3.9 full-time equivalents and 39 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(6)Blue Ribbon Child Care Society (Grant No. 40):

The agency recently began serving new immigrant parents of the Blue Ribbon Daycare Centre in the western area of the former City of Toronto. The agency proposes to introduce job search programs, English language training classes and computer classes. In 1997, individuals were served by a staff of 3 full-time equivalents and 21 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(7)Bob Rumball Centre for the Deaf (Grant No. 41):

The agency provides services for the hearing impaired across the new City of Toronto. Services include an elderly persons' centre, seniors supportive housing and nursing services, adult education programs which prepare students for independent living, job readiness and working English, English-as-a-second language classes, one to one tutoring, adult literacy and vocational training program. Activities include a bi-monthly newsletter, weekly arts and craft classes, bowling, bingo, euchre, self-help groups, trips and excursions, recreational sports, aquafit, games, diner's clubs, friendly visiting, workshops and seminars. In 1997, 1,024 individuals were served by a staff of 85 full-time equivalents and 272 volunteers.

Conditions:

In both 1996 and 1997, the agency was advised that future funding was conditional on the development of an open and accessible membership structure. To date, the agency has made little progress in changing its membership or governance structure to address this situation.

The agency is required to develop a membership and Board recruitment strategy which includes a review of the agency's by-laws, an analysis of the community to which the agency is accountable, the development of membership targets which ensure accountability to this community and an implementation plan. This strategy must be integrated with the agency's anti-discrimination and access policy. Staff will work with the agency to ensure the development of a strategy which meets the funding criteria.

Future funding will be conditional on the continued implementation of the developed plan.

Comments:

This condition has been under discussion with the agency since 1996, when staff identified that the agency did not meet a number of the Metro Community Resources Fund (C.R.F.) funding criteria.

(1)The agency does not demonstrate community support through an active agency membership:

The Bob Rumball Centre for the Deaf's (BRCD) bylaws state that the agency's voting membership is comprised of the Board of Directors, the incorporated body, The Ontario Mission for the Deaf, and "other individuals, corporations, partnerships and other legal entities as are admitted as members by the board of directors, from time to time." This does not meet the criteria since only those members of the deaf community who are already on the Board of Directors, act as the official representative of the Ontario Mission for the Deaf, or are admitted "from time to time" can participate in this membership.

(2)The Board of Directors is not representative of the communities served:

As noted earlier, the BRCD's membership consists of the agency's Board of Directors, the incorporated Ontario Mission for the Deaf, and others admitted "from time to time." According to the agency's by-laws, this membership elects the Board of Directors each year at the agency's annual general meeting. However, the agency's by-laws also give the Ontario Mission for the Deaf a veto on virtually all matters voted on by the membership, including the election of the Board of Directors. Specifically, the agency's by-laws provide the Ontario Mission for the Deaf with the number of votes cast by all other members plus one additional vote (the single exception where this privilege does not provide a veto is in the case of motions to remove individual members of the Board of Directors before the end of their term; such removal requires the support of two-thirds of the votes cast).

The Board of the BRCD is also not reflective of the Toronto community served by the agency. At its grant assessment interview, the Executive Director and Board President of the BRCD reported that both the staff and the clients of the Centre were, like the deaf community of Toronto, ethnically highly diverse. Currently, the Board of the organization, does not reflect this diversity.

In addition, during the assessment interview, the President of the Board acknowledged that no efforts had been undertaken by the agency to improve the representativeness of the Board. In a letter to grants staff dated April 15, 1998, the Executive Director expressed his opinion that such efforts would be futile since "the minorities in the deaf community are our students (not our leaders at the present time)".

The opportunity exists for the agency to facilitate minority students to become leaders within the organization. This should be an agency priority along with external recruitment of minorities from within the deaf community, and staff will assist the agency in developing a strategy to address this issue.

Reverend Rumball in his deputation communicated his opinion that open membership implies that the "non-deaf will decide for the deaf." Staff have already responded to these concerns (written correspondence April 20, 1998) by clarifying that "community" as used in the C.R.F. criteria in all cases refers to the community served and/or the community to which the agency is accountable (in this case the deaf community). Based on the agency's concerns, staff further encourage the agency to review its bylaws as they pertain to the composition of the Board of Directors. These by-laws specify that the agency's 20 member Board of Directors must have a minimum of 5 deaf and 5hearing members. Based on information provided by the agency the Board is currently composed of 8 hearing and 6 non-hearing individuals.

(8)Broad African Resource Centre (Grant No. 47):

The agency serves African families and children across the new City of Toronto. They provide after school tutoring and activity programs through the use of volunteers. As well, they support single parents through outreach services regarding education and social issues and provide home visits, referral services and employment training. In 1997, 30 individuals were served by 20 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is recommended for $3,000.00 in additional funds for a total grant of $6,000.00

(9)Centre for Equality Rights in Accommodation (Grant No.71):

The organization promotes knowledge and enforcement of human rights among disadvantaged groups and individuals, with an emphasis on access to adequate and affordable housing across the new City of Toronto. Public education and advocacy on housing issues as well as assistance to individuals are provided. The largest client group served by CERA is low income families with children. In 1997, 1286 individuals were served by a staff of 2.9 full-time equivalents and 30 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

Comments:

The agency is also recommended for a 1998 grant from the Access and Equity Grant program for $5,500.00.

(10)Chalkfarm Community and Family Centre (Grant No. 75):

The agency serves residents of the area surrounding the Jane Street/Wilson Avenue intersection bounded by Sheppard Avenue, Keele Street, Highway 401 and 400. The agency and three others (Daystrom Family Resource Centre, Falstaff Community Service Organization, and Jane Finch Boys' and Girls' Club) have been collaborating to provide a variety of recreational activities, social services, and educational programs, and are about to undergo a merger. Activities include a parent/child drop-in program with a bilingual Spanish component, adult fitness, social recreational programming for children, youth and seniors, women's support group, special community events, and a newsletter. In 1997, these four partner agencies served 3,730 individuals using a staff of 6 full-time equivalents and 378 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

Comments:

The agency is about to conclude a merger with Falstaff Community Service Organization, Jane and Finch Boys' & Girls' Club and Daystrom Family Resource Centre to form a new agency, Doorsteps. The grant allocation for 1998 reflects a combined flat-line allocation of the grants that the four agencies received in 1997.

The 1998 grant allocation represents a total amount for the merged agencies that in 1997 went to four different locations. In 1997, the Community Service grants from all of the former municipalities was: Chalkfarm Community and Family Centre - $27,200.00; Falstaff Community Service Organization - $27,200.00; and Daystrom Family Resource Centre - $49,688.00 (including $8,000.00 to the Jane Finch Boys' and Girls' Club).

(11)Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto (Grant No. 78):

The organization serves residents of the Greater Toronto area. They recently began providing cultural services for individuals and families through general interest courses, organized activities, celebrations and festivals, collaborative projects with institutions such as the ROM, AGO, Toronto District School Board, and the Bathurst Jewish Centre.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

Comments:

The agency is recommended for a 1998 grant from the Cultural Grants program for $3,000.00.

(12)Community Information Centre for the City of York (Grant No. 94):

The agency serves residents and service providers in the former City of York. Services include information and referral, case management and child care information services, advocacy, informal counselling, community outreach and publications. In 1997, 8,077 client contacts were made by a staff of 2.6 full-time equivalents and 28 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(13)Coping in Tough Times (Grant No. 104):

The agency serves lower and fixed income residents across the new City of Toronto including social assistance recipients and subsidized housing tenants. The organization trains volunteers to provide counselling and support to those needing assistance in managing their income and expenses. In 1997, 7,000 individuals were served by a staff of 1 full-time equivalent and 105 volunteers.

Condition:

The 1998 grant will be held until the agency has secured another organization to manage and operate the budget counselling programs. Future funding is conditional on the agency providing an audited financial statement.

Staff confirm their original conditions.

Comments:

The financial vulnerability of this agency raises concerns about its long-term viability. The agency was advised in 1997 to pursue appropriate restructuring opportunities. The agency has been strongly encouraged formally to pursue partnerships with other appropriate service providers working with a similar population during the last two years. To date the agency has not developed structural partnerships with any other service providers. Staff are not requiring that the merger process be complete before the 1998 grant be released, but that at a minimum, a clear contract of agreement to proceed with the merger with agreed upon time lines be established.

(14)Crime S.C.O.P.E. - Etobicoke (Grant No. 111):

The agency serves residents of the former City of Etobicoke. They are responsible for the implementation of the recommendations of the former Etobicoke Mayor's Task Force on Community Safety through building community partnerships and involving people in creating programs to enhance feelings of community safety. They organize youth conferences, neighbours nights out with the Police and Seniors Awareness Programs. In 1997, 50 individuals were served by a staff of 1 full-time equivalent and 236 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(15)Deep Quong Non-profit Homes Inc. (Grant No. 121):

The Deep Quong Non-Profit Homes Inc. provides affordable, secure singles housing with shared facilities at 106 Beverley Street in the former City of Toronto. The agency provides services and programs to the residents in order to encourage resident involvement in the community and to encourage personal growth and development. In 1997, 92 individuals were served by a staff of 3 full-time equivalents and 23 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(16)Economic Community Starting Centre (Grant No.139):

The agency mandate is to assist people across the new City of Toronto to find employment, develop self-employment opportunities, or develop community economic development positions through the creation of a City-wide data base of individuals looking for work and possible employers. Proposed activities include recruiting retired workers to act as employment mentors and working with small business to create employment. The agency is not currently providing services, and has no staff or volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(17)Elspeth Heyworth Centre for Women (North York) (Grant No. 142):

The organization serves immigrant women in the area bounded by Steeles Avenue, Wilson Avenue, Islington Avenue and Dufferin Street. The organization offers English-as-a-second language and sewing classes, workshops, life skills education and settlement support services such as interpretation, translation, escorting and supportive counselling. In 1997, 513 individuals were served by a staff of 4.5 full-time equivalents and 43 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(18)Eritrean Canadian Community Centre of Metropolitan Toronto (Grant No. 145):

The agency serves the Eritrean community with settlement support, cultural and community development activities. Programs are for people of all ages across the new City of Toronto and include tutoring, settlement support, violence and suicide prevention and other community development activities. In 1997, 1,135 people participated in services offered by one full time equivalent staff and 73 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

Comments:

When the group applied through the consolidated Community Services Grants program application form, they included their Access and Equity funds as if it were a former Metro C.R.F. grant. During the staff review of applications, it was determined with the group that these funds were not properly attributed to the Metro C.R.F., and were therefore not eligible for a flatline allocation for 1998. Unfortunately, it was not determined at that time that the funds had actually come from another former Metro program, the Access and Equity Program. At the Municipal Grants Review Committee meeting on June 1, 1998, the agency indicated in its deputation that they were concerned about the loss of funds from the City, and subsequently provided documentation to the Community Service Grants staff showing that the former grant had come from the former Metro Access and Equity Programs in 1997.

(19)Eritrean-Canadian Society For Youth Advancement (Grant No. 146):

The agency serves youth and young adults of the Eritrean community in the areas bounded by Lake Ontario, Lawrence Avenue, Victoria Park Avenue and Lansdowne Avenue. They provide workshops, information through a newsletter, organize volunteers, and work with women's groups in order to provide an environment that enables young Eritreans in Toronto to be members of Canadian society. In 1997, 576 individuals were served by 71 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(20)Ethiopian Association in Toronto (Grant No. 148):

The agency serves the Ethiopian community in the new City of Toronto. Services include supportive counselling, interpretation, translation, advocacy, orientation for newcomers, heritage language classes for children, summer day camp, refugee sponsorship, workshops, seminars and a newsletter. In 1997, 2,750 individuals were served by a staff of 10 full-time equivalents and 88 volunteers.

Conditions:

In 1997, the agency's C.R.F. grant was held pending the submission of a plan to reduce the agency's debt. The agency subsequently retired its debt with the inappropriate use of federal and provincial grant funds. As a result, the 1998 grant will be held pending the agency securing an acceptable trustee to manage its municipal grant.

The 1998 grant will also be held pending the development of a strategy and implementation plan to address the under-representation of women in the agency's decision-making processes, including the Board. Future funding will be conditional on the continued implementation of this plan.

Staff confirm their original condition.

Comments:

The agency is also recommended for a 1998 grant from the Recreation Grants program for $4,500.00.

Staff spoke on June 3, 1998, to the federal funders of the agency, who are concerned about the financial management of the agency. The federal and provincial funders of the agency will be meeting with City staff shortly to discuss their joint funding concerns.

(21)Etobicoke Crime Prevention Association (Grant No. 149):

This agency serves the residents of the former City of Etobicoke. This organization serves to reduce crime in the community through such measures as crime prevention education, providing a communication network to share ideas and holding seminars. In 1997, 2,700 individuals were served by a staff of 2.5 full-time equivalents and 144 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(22)First Nations Day Committee (Grant No. 162):

The committee organizes a one day festival celebrating First Nations Day, on June 21 of each year. The festival features traditional and cultural activities. Participants at the festival are mostly inner-city, Aboriginal individuals and families. In 1997 more than 1000 individuals participated in the festival which was organized by 60 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

Comments:

As recommended by Committee and Council, $2,000.00 will be allocated from other funds for the one day festival.

(23)For Youth Project (Grant No.168):

The For Youth Project is a partnership initiative comprised of eight organizations (mainstream and ethno-specific) looking at issues affecting ethno-racial youth in the former City of York. This is a community development/systems change initiative looking at restructuring existing services and institutions to better meet the needs of ethno-racial youth. Youth have been involved in the initiative and organized a number of meetings, workshops and events. As well, the coalition of agencies is intending to set up a youth resource centre. In 1997, a staff of 0.7 full-time equivalents and 19 volunteers worked on the initiative.

Recommendation:

The agency is recommended for an additional $26,000.00.

Comments:

The agency's initial recommendation has been reconsidered and revised, returning the agency to their actual 1997 funding base for a total grant of $36,210.00.

(24)Friends of Shopping Bag Ladies (416 Drop-In Centre) (Grant No. 171):

The agency provides a daily drop-in for homeless, transient and socially isolated women across the new City of Toronto. Services include shower and laundry facilities, clothing, food depot, breakfast and a hot lunch, crisis intervention, health services, recreation activities, and housing. In 1997, 85,000 client contacts were made by a staff of 9 full-time equivalents and 53 volunteers.

Conditions:

The 1998 grant will be held pending the agency developing a system to refer male clients to other service providers. This should include the agency meeting regularly with other agencies providing services to homeless men and developing a system which documents the process of referral and when service is accesssed or denied. The referral system needs to be operationalized by August 14 of 1998.

Comments:

A number of conditions were placed on funding to this agency in 1997. The agency was directed to redirect male clients to other service providers. Though a portion of the male clients have been referred to other agencies the Board of Directors has revised the agencies mandate to allow for the provision of services to "vulnerable males".

On August13and14,1997, the former Metropolitan Council adopted Clause No. 4 of Report No. 10 of The Human Services Committee wherein it recommended that the Friends of Shopping Bag Ladies develop and immediately implement a plan to redirect male clients to more appropriate service providers and that a property audit of the agency be conducted. This recommendation resulted in the E.S.F. allocation to this agency, of $8,000.00 being held pending the completion of the property audit. On November7,1997, the Commissioner of Community Services reported to the Human Services Committee that the property audit was complete and recommended that the $8,000.00 be released. The issue of male clients was still unresolved at this time. In September1997, the agency held an Annual General meeting at which time a change was made to the by-laws, requiring membership requests to be approved by the Board of Directors. In Novemberof 1997, the agency informed staff that the agency mission statement had been changed to include the following sentence "to provide limited support to those men unable to access traditional male services." The agency was advised by staff that this change in mandate could influence future funding recommendations. Staff have tried to encourage the agency to open dialogue with other drop-in programs serving the male homeless population.

The agency has made efforts to comply with the condition by moving half of their male clients to other services, but has not fully met the condition placed by the former Metro Council on August 1997, to redirect male clients to more appropriate services. The 1998 condition stating that the agency must develop a system to refer male clients to other service providers is based on this direction. The August 14 deadline has been determined to allow for reallocation of these dollars in the E.S.F. Winter allocations to be reported in September if the agency is unable to meet the conditions of the funding.

(25)The Greek Community of Metropolitan Toronto Inc. (Grant No. 177):

The agency serves the Greek community in the new City of Toronto. Services include form filling, counselling, casework, interpretation, translation, escort, employment assistance and orientation, social and recreational programs for children and families, a community outreach program and home support services for seniors. In 1997, 13,910 individuals were served by a staff of 9.25 full-time equivalents and 147 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(26)Heritage Skills Development Centre (Grant No. 182):

The organization promotes the social and economic self-sufficiency of African Canadian and other visible minority women. Activities include training in small business management, sewing and fashion design, and access to information and services. The Heritage Fashion Design Network project facilitates shared resources in the initial stages of small business development. Other activities include life skills and nutrition programs. In 1997, 1,489 people were served by a staff of 2 full-time equivalents and 27 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

Comments:

The agency is also recommended for a 1998 grant from the Economic Development Partnership Program for $20,000.00; from the Access and Equity Grant program for $3,500.00; and from the Recreation Grants program for $6,000.00.

(27)Horseed Youth Club (Grant No. 188):

The agency serves Somali and non-Somali youth across the new City of Toronto. They co-ordinate social and recreation activities, hold sports events and run a soccer club. In 1997, 30,000 individuals were contacted by 15 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(28)Malvern Family Resource Centre (Grant No. 230):

The agency serves the residents in the Malvern area of the former City of Scarborough bounded by Markham Road, Morningside Avenue, Finch Avenue and Highway 401. The agency provides parent/child, family support and multicultural programs for individuals and families. The agency also provides a newsletter and monthly brown bag lunches. In 1997, 3,615 individuals were served by a staff of 5.5 full-time equivalents and 160 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(29)Metro Association of Family Resource Programmes (Grant No. 239):

The organization supports the development of family resource programs through networking, professional and organizational development, consultation, advocacy, public education and staff and volunteer training. In 1997, 1,000 client contacts were made by a staff of 0.5 full-time equivalent and 82 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is recommended for a grant of $10,000.00 to assist in the provision of organizational support to family resources programs.

(30)Metro Street Focus (Grant No. 241):

The agency was previously known as The Samaritan Street Help Organization. The agency provides a volunteer support service offering practical assistance to street children and their families and the homeless. Through a street outreach service the agency provides food, clothing, transportation referral and support to the homeless. In 1997, the agency served over 500 individuals with 31 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(31)Native African Inmates and Families Association (Grant No. 254):

The agency addresses the unique cultural and linguistic needs of Continental African Canadians who come into conflict with the criminal justice system, with an emphasis on prevention, rehabilitation and integration. Programs include inmates, ex-inmates, victims and their families, as well as the broader community. In 1997, 475 people were served by a staff of 1.5 full-time equivalents and 19 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(32)Open Door Centre and Rooms Registry Service Inc. (Grant No. 284):

The agency serves people who are unemployed, homeless and mentally or physically disabled primarily in the downtown area of the former City of Toronto. Specific programs include a drop-in centre with a low cost food bar, mail service, recreational activities, income tax clinic, needle exchange program, and a rooms registry service. In 1997, 33,000 client contacts were made by a staff of 4.8 full-time equivalents and 88 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is recommended for a grant of $114,000.00 to assist in the provision of the drop-in program. The recommended grant includes an amount of $15,000.00 allocated through the E.S.F. winter program, which has already been forwarded to the agency.

Conditions:

Future funding is conditional on the agency restructuring with the Toronto Friendship Centre or another appropriate agency. The funds will be held until a plan for merger/restructuring endorsed by the Board of Directors of both organizations has been submitted. The 1998 grant will go to the provision of the drop-in programs, and an additional $5,000.00 will be given to the agency from the Contingency Fund toward costs related to restructuring if required.

Comments:

The agency is also recommended for a 1998 grant from the Homeless Initiatives Fund program for $20,000.00.

The Toronto Friendship Centre and the Open Door and Rooms Registry Service Inc. have been asked to strongly consider restructuring options over the last five years. Both agencies are located in the same building and serve similar clients. The Toronto Friendship Centre is currently facing financial difficulties as a result of the loss of charity casino revenue.

Both organizations have been faced with financial difficulties at different times as a result of funding reductions or funding instability while at the same time responding to increasing needs in the area. Further, both agencies have had difficulties in securing and maintaining a full and active Board of Directors to govern the organizations and ensure community accountability.

Staff have met with both organizations and are proceeding with preliminary restructuring discussions to evaluate the potential for merger between these two organizations. Dependant on these discussions the two agencies may begin the merger process with each other or identify other partners. At a minimum the agencies will be required to review agency operations to address issues of management and governance.

Staff are seeking clarification with respect to the Board membership and accountability of the organization. The agency will be requested to submit minutes of past Board meetings, and a plan to strengthen the membership structure.

(33)Parkdale Intercultural Association (Grant No. 299):

Parkdale Intercultural Association provides settlement information and organizes educational and cultural activities for people in the Parkdale community. Activities include English as a Second language training, individual support, community development, education and cultural events. In 1997, 1,300 people were served by a staff of 4 full-time equivalents and 57 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

Comments:

The agency is also recommended for a 1998 grant from the Access and Equity Grant program for $14,000.00.

(34)Refugees And Immigrants Information Centre Toronto Inc. (Grant No. 311):

The agency serves immigrants and refugees in the St. Jamestown and Cabbagetown neighbourhood and across the new City of Toronto. Direct services include information and referral, English language classes and settlement counselling. In addition, they provide translation of documents for a fee. In 1997, 27,000 individuals were contacted or served by 5 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(35)Sahara Charitable Organization (Grant No. 316):

The agency provides settlement and orientation services to immigrants and refugees in the former City of North York. Services include supportive counselling, form filling and escort. In 1997, 200 individuals were served by 34 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(36)Scarborough Housing Help Centre (Grant No. 320):

The agency provides programs and services such as a central housing registry and a home-sharing program, resource centre of information on housing, housing help telephone line, workshops and a mediation service, and is located in the former City of Scarborough. The emphasis is on both tenants and landlord programs. The agency works with other services to provide a Winter Relief Program. In 1997, 1,967 individuals were served by a staff of 6 full-time equivalents and 17 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(37)Second Base (Scarborough) Youth Shelter (Grant No. 323):

The agency provide emergency shelter to youth in the former City of Scarborough. The agency provides food, clothing, counselling and life skills training. In 1997, the agency served 833 youth at the shelter and 403 through the outreach program with a staff of 1.5 full time equivalents and 51 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(38)761 Community Development Corporation (Grant No. 331):

The agency supports community self help and economic development initiatives focusing on individuals facing long term poverty and homelessness. Agency Community Economic Development initiatives include; Prezents of Mind; Street City Bikes and Inspirations. These programs provide participants with the opportunity to gain training and support. The agency serves individuals from across the new City of Toronto. In 1997, 700 individuals were served by a staff of 12 full-time equivalents and 62 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

Comments:

A report regarding this agency will be submitted to the Municipal Grants Review Committee.

(39)Sikh Youth and Family Resource Centre (Grant No. 333):

The agency serves residents across the new City of Toronto. They provide settlement services and translators to newcomers. They also provide translators to other services, such as women's shelters. In 1997, 380 individuals were served by a staff of 1 full-time equivalent and 22 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(40)Silayan Filipino Community Centre (Grant No. 334):

The agency serves new immigrants, seniors, women, youth, victims of abuse and the unemployed. Services include interpretation, translation, housing registry and escorts. In 1997, 1883 client contacts were made by staff of 1 full-time equivalent and 59 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(41)SIWA- Somali Immigrant Women Association (Grant No. 337):

The agency serves women and children across the new City of Toronto. They provide community and social services for women and children. Direct services include post-settlement counselling, life skill workshops, peer support and support groups for assaulted women. In 1997, 840 individuals were served by 50 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is recommended for $1,000.00 in additional funds for a total grant of $6,000.00.

(42)St. Bernadette's Family Resource Centre (Grant No. 355):

The agency serves children and parents with special needs in the former City of York. The Centre offers respite programs for families with developmentally handicapped children and programs to integrate the children in community activities. Programs presently offered include a parent support group, parent/child we need a break program, after four program and a youth theatre program. All programs are integrated. In 1997, 486 individuals were served by a staff of 7 full-time equivalents and 39 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

Comments:

The agency is also recommended for a 1998 grant from the Cultural Grants program for $2,000.00. Staff will report to Community Neighbourhood and Services Committee and the Municipal Grants Review Committee at a later date regarding supports to agencies for summer student programming.

(43)Thadeus Human Support and Development (Grant No. 381):

The agency has not provided services as of yet. The agency proposes to deliver a youth peer support program in the former City of Toronto. In 1997, no individuals were served.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(44)Thistletown Teen Centre (Grant No. 384):

The organization proposes to set up a youth centre in the Thistletown area of the former City of Etobicoke. The organization proposes to run social and recreational programs including workshops on drug awareness and literacy. The organization has no paid staff. In 1997, no individuals were served.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

Comments:

Staff will initiate discussions with the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism and report back at a later date.

(45)Toronto Child Abuse Centre (Grant No. 390):

The agency promotes co-operation among health, legal, child protection and education systems and advocates for improved responses to child sexual abuse. It provides a range of unique services to sexually abused children, their families and offenders. Services are provided in three program areas: early identification/prevention, protection/legal response and support/treatment. Specific examples of initiatives include teachers in service training, preventive education program, child sexual abuse protocol, child-victim witness support program, crisis group support program, and treatment resource directory. In 1997, 2,304 individuals were served by a staff of 14 full-time equivalents and 126 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(46)Toronto Friendship Centre Inc. (Grant No. 398):

The agency provides a drop-in facility five days a week, for the homeless, transient, poor, and mostly unemployed men and women, in the downtown area of the former City of Toronto. Services include food, daytime shelter, health services, mail, women's programs, recreation, employment and housing assistance, substance abuse counselling, telephone access, volunteer programs and resource library. In 1997, 2,000 individuals were served by a staff of 4 full-time equivalents and 125 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is recommended for a grant of $83,593.00 to assist in the provision of the drop-in program.

Conditions:

Future funding is conditional on the agency restructuring with the Open Door and Rooms Registry Inc. The funds will be held until a plan for merger/restructuring endorsed by the Board of Directors of both organizations has been submitted. The 1998 grant will go to the provision of the drop-in program, and an additional $5,000.00 will be given to the agency from the Contingency Fund towards costs related to restructuring if required.

Comments:

The agency is also recommended for a 1998 grant from the Recreation Grants program for $2,000.00.

The Toronto Friendship Centre and the Open Door and Rooms Registry Service Inc. have been asked to strongly consider restructuring options over the last five years. Both agencies are located in the same building and serve similar clients. The Toronto Friendship Centre is currently facing financial difficulties as a result of the loss of charity casino revenue.

Both organizations have been faced with financial difficulties at different times as a result of funding reductions or funding instability while at the same time responding to increasing needs in the area. Further both agencies have had difficulties in securing and maintaining a full and active Board of Directors to govern the organizations and ensure community accountability.

Staff have met with both organizations and are proceeding with preliminary restructuring discussions to evaluate the potential for merger between these two organizations. Dependant on these discussions the two agencies may begin the merger process with each other or identify other partners. At a minimum, the agencies will be required to review agency operations to address issues of management and governance.

(47)United Oromo Canadian Society of Ontario (Grant No. 415):

The agency serves Oromo residents across the new City of Toronto. The agency provides services that offer orientation and guidance to newcomers and post-settlement programs to assist community members to integrate. Services provided include: counselling, workshops, job search assistance and skills training. In 1997, 300 individuals were served by a staff of 2 full-time equivalents and 65 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant .

(48)Vietnamese Youth Centre of Toronto (Grant No. 425):

The agency offers educational, cultural, and recreational activities for youth of Vietnamese origin residing across the new City of Toronto. Services include computer instruction, social clubs, library group, cultural and entertainment activities, sport events, discussion groups and a newsletter. In 1997, 1,000 client contracts were made by 24 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for a grant.

(49)Welfare Committee for the Assyrian Community in Canada (Grant No. 433):

The agency serves Assyrian speaking residents of the former Cities of Etobicoke and North York and the Greater Toronto Area. The agency provides various community, social and cultural services. In 1997, 345 individuals were served by a staff of 0.3 full-time equivalents and 20 volunteers.

Recommendation:

The agency is not recommended for additional funds.

(50)Y.M.C.A. of Greater Toronto, Etobicoke Youth Centre (Grant No. 456):

The Y.M.C.A. offers a wide range of recreation and community service programs across the Greater Toronto Area. In 1997, 163,103 people were registered in Y.M.C.A. programs, offered by a staff of 650 full-time equivalents and 9,334 volunteers.

Recommendation:

This agency is not recommended for additional funds.

Comments:

Staff will initiate discussions with the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism and report back at a later date.

(Copies of the communication dated June 21, 1998, from Ms. Darlene O'Donohue of the Homeward Family Shelter and the communication dated June 22, 1998, from Ms. Boyka Lokumo Monique, Director of the Economic Community Starting Centre Toronto Job Creation Inc.have been circulated to all Members of Council under separate cover.)

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, a communication (June 29, 1998) from Ms. B. L. Monique, Director, Economic Community Starting Centre Job Creation Inc., providing information regarding the services offered by the agency and requesting that a grant be provided.)

(Councillor Jones, at the meeting of City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, declared her interest in those portions of the foregoing Clause pertaining to the Etobicoke Crime Prevention Association (Grant No. 149), and the Thistletown Community Services Unit (Grant No.383), in that her husband has prepared audited statements for such organizations.)

(Councillor Kinahan, at the meeting of City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, declared his interest in those portions of the foregoing Clause pertaining to the Etobicoke Crime Prevention Association (Grant No. 149), in that he is a Member of the Association's Board of Directors.)

10

Homeless Initiatives Fund - 1998 Grant Allocations

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached report (May 19, 1998) from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services respecting the Homeless Initiatives Fund - 1998 Grant Allocations.

--------

(Report dated May 19, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)

Purpose:

This report recommends $593,500.00 in grants to 19 community groups for Homeless Initiatives Fund (HIF) projects in 1998. The report will also outline plans, currently underway, for a targeted proposal call that will identify recipients for $190,000.00 in funding, the balance of the HIF for 1998.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications:

Funds are available in the approved 1998 Consolidated Grants Program Budget.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the attached 1998 Homeless Initiatives Fund (HIF) Grants totalling $593,500.00 for 19 agencies described in Appendices A and B be approved;

(2)an amount of $190,000.00 of the HIF be held for allocation to projects to be identified through targeted proposal calls outlined in Appendix C, to be determined by the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services once community agencies have been chosen;

(3)as a condition of receipt of these grant funds, the recipient provides a final report on their use to the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services; and

(4)the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background History:

The Homeless Initiatives Fund is a program of the Housing Division that was established to identify the problems faced by homeless people and develop long term solutions through partnerships with community based groups.

The program, created in 1992 by the former City of Toronto, has grown out of a strong foundation of community partnerships and acknowledgment of the importance of a continuum of services for a wide variety of people who are homeless or are in danger of becoming homeless.

City Council at its meeting on February 4, 5, and 6, 1998, adopted a transitional grants policy to apply to all municipal grants given by Metro and the six Area Municipalities. For 1998 only, grant programs delivered in the former municipalities are available only to those community council areas. The 1998 Homeless Initiative Fund, therefore, is only available to community agencies in the Toronto Community Council District.

In addition, the transitional grants policy recommended that all organizations which received core, sustaining, or on-going funding in 1997 be given the opportunity to receive up to 50 percent of their 1997 approved allocation as an advance in 1998.

Establishment of the Homeless Initiatives Fund Program:

The Homeless Initiatives Fund Program is based on the former City of Toronto's "Off The Streets" policy which recognized that homelessness is a multi-faceted problem which requires a variety of different problem solving approaches depending on the individual circumstances of homeless people. Support is provided to ensure that homeless people are safe and healthy, to prevent people from becoming homeless and to provide them with support on their own terms. There are three objectives of this policy:

(1)Prevention:

There are people who are at risk of losing their housing due to economic circumstances, difficulty budgeting, antisocial survival behaviours, health problems, and other external issues including limited flexibility on the part of landlords. Support, through community agencies, is provided to help people maintain their housing.

(2)Outreach and Support:

There are people who are living "on the streets" and are not at the point where they are able to accept help or make changes in their lives. Support is provided through community agencies to reach out to these people through community contact.

(3)Support for Change:

Change is assisted through a variety of strategies that include access to shelter and housing, health care, economic development, and other community development projects.

Community groups with ongoing support from the Homeless Initiatives Fund have developed projects to meet these varying needs. They range from outreach and support to the most isolated street people to projects that prevent displacement, eviction, and homelessness, as well as initiatives that support people when they move into permanent housing. In some cases, they provide a strategic intervention to prevent someone from becoming homeless or losing touch with personal supports, or are able to connect people with the help they need to solve their problems.

The Homeless Initiatives Fund is not simply a grants program but is integrated into the work of the Housing Division and is an instrument to develop and implement City policies relating to homelessness. Housing staff work closely with HIF projects both directly and through project steering committees to create efficiencies, link projects to resources in the greater community and with various levels of government, and advocate for long term funding from senior levels of government.

Homeless Initiatives - Proposals for 1998:

This report recommends $593,500.00 in funding to 19 community groups. Two projects applied for an advance: Anishnawbe Health Toronto is receiving an advance of $55,500.00 on their recommended 1998 allocation of $111,000.00, and Community Information Toronto is receiving an advance of $22,500.00 on their recommended 1998 allocation of $45,000.00.

Projects in the Homeless Initiatives Fund which received funding in 1997 and had no identified performance concerns are recommended for funding in 1998 at the same level received in 1997. New projects will be identified through targeted proposal calls as outlined later in this report. The exception is the Rupert Community Residential Services grant which has been increased by $5,000.00 to provide emergency tenant relocation services to vulnerable rooming house tenants facing eviction. Housing Division staff have identified this service as a key tool in preventing homelessness among this vulnerable tenant group.

Housing staff have also been working closely with other municipal staff both prior to and after amalgamation to develop more effective programs and to co-ordinate funding to community groups. Prior to amalgamation municipal funding for groups serving homeless people came primarily from the Housing, Public Health and Planning and Development Divisions in the former City of Toronto, and from the Community Services Department (through Grants and Hostel Services programs) at the former Metropolitan Toronto.

Over the past year, Housing Division staff have been working with the agencies who are providing services through Homeless Initiatives funding to ensure that efficiencies are created, groups linked to other resources that they might need, and the services are appropriate for the target group. In addition, staff have met with each project to monitor progress and have requested detailed reporting on the services provided, partnerships developed, main accomplishments, and emerging needs identified during the course of project delivery.

Priorities for 1998 have been developed through ongoing consultations with the Alternative Housing and Services Committee and from two community consultations conducted by Housing Division staff: the "Housing Strategies for Homeless People" Workshop that was held in July 1997 and the "Continuum of Support" Community Planning and Modelling forum held in May 1998.

The Homeless Initiatives Fund has the following four components for 1998:

(1)Street Survivors Initiatives;

(2)Housing Help; and

(3)Innovations and Longer Term Initiatives.

In addition, the Homeless Initiatives Program has an additional component, the Capital Leverage Fund, which provides capital funding for community-based housing and shelter projects for homeless people. For information purposes, it is described later in this report.

The following describes each of the components of the Homeless Initiatives Fund program, proposed grants and targeted proposal calls for 1998, and specific issues that will be addressed over the course of 1998.

(1)Street Survivors Initiatives:

"Street Survivors" is a term used to describe socially isolated people who literally live on the streets, in ravines and wooded areas, or are hidden in derelict buildings, under bridges or in simply constructed forms of shelter such as cardboard boxes. They have no or limited access to community services for a wide variety of reasons. These may vary from a distrust or inappropriateness of service, fear of others or people in authority, lack of identification or frustration with complicated intake procedures, or a need to be independent.

Street Survivors initiatives address the needs of people who are on the streets. Our research and consultation with community groups has indicated that this is not a homogeneous group. Needs differ dramatically among men, women, and youth. Although all are unable to deal with the structural or emotional complexities of life in the city, their reactions vary considerably. Some people hide in shelters hidden in ravines and have little contact with others while some form small cohesive groups that support each other - men who cluster around hot air grates in the business district and youth in squats are two examples of this latter group. Women who end up on the streets do so as an absolute last resort and have learned coping mechanisms in order to survive that tend to isolate them.

This group of people, because they have been so hurt in their past, are one of the most difficult to understand. Community groups who work with them know that developing trust, knowledge and understanding takes time and patience. Determining how to address their needs presents an even greater challenge. Developing effective strategies for Street Survivors has been identified by community groups as one of the priorities for the Homeless Initiatives Fund in 1998.

The Street Survivors program has three components:

(i)Street Outreach and Connection to Services;

(ii)Street Survivors Initiatives; and

(iii)Information and Communications.

(i)Street Outreach and Connection to Services:

The Homeless Initiatives Fund has historically funded street outreach strategies to address the needs of people living on the streets, in squats (abandoned buildings) and other forms of "sleeping rough" (parks, ravines, garages). This type of project reaches out to street people by bringing them food, clothing, first aid and other essentials. Once trust is established, referrals can be made to other resources. The Homeless Initiatives Fund ensures that there is a regular service available to street people on a year round basis. This becomes the base for additional services during the cold winter months and also for emergency responses during Extreme Cold Weather Alerts.

The Street Patrol is operated by Anishnawbe Health Toronto which has been funded by the HIF since 1992. In 1998 it is recommended that $111,000.00 be provided to operate the Street Patrol, mobile street outreach service to homeless people five evenings/week, January 1, 1998 - December31,1998, and an additional two evenings/week January 1, 1998 - April 15, 1998, and November 15, 1998 - December 31, 1998. This project also receives funding for extended services from the Emergency Support Fund.

Staff are currently reviewing Street Outreach, will be conducting a community forum and will be developing an Outreach plan that covers the new City and its changing needs for 1999.

(ii)Street Survivors Initiatives:

The strategies to address the needs of men, women and youth street survivors differ dramatically. "Savard's" is a ten bed "high support/low demand" shelter program which has been operated by Homes First Society since January 1997. It has successfully provided stability for ten women who were previously on the street and were not able to maintain shelter, or were barred, from the women's hostel system. This is the first project of its kind in Canada and staff are working with the Savard's Resource Group to monitor, evaluate, and recommend improvements to the project. The HIF recommendation is for $75,000.00 in funding for operating costs.

Staff are also working on two new street survivors initiatives for men and for street youth who are not accessing community services. These initiatives are outlined in Appendix "C".

(iii)Information and Communications:

The HIF is recommending three projects for 1998: the Community Information Toronto "Street Helpline", the "Out of the Cold" program to provide training and better co-ordination of services, and Street Health to help homeless people obtain proper identification cards in order to access community services.

$45,000.00 is recommended for Community Information Toronto for the operation of the Street Helpline, a telephone information service offered free of charge to homeless people. The HIF has provided funding for this service since 1992.

Hotline "peer counsellors" who have had personal experience with life on the street answer calls. Regular Community Information Centre staff provide backup when necessary. Information available through the Hotline consists of: the location of the nearest shelter beds; location and hours of day drop-ins; availability of space in the Out of the Cold programs; befriending; crisis referrals; and directions to other services such as food banks.

$30,000.00 is recommended for training and co-ordination support to Out of the Cold, a coalition of churches who provide food and emergency overnight shelter to a wide variety of homeless people. The number of churches involved in Out of the Cold has grown dramatically in the past few years.

In 1994/95, there were ten churches involved in the program, in 1997/98 there were 24. Since it is run primarily by volunteers, the need for training and better co-ordination of services has increased. HIF support for these functions has been provided since 1996.

$10,000.00 is recommended for Street Health who have been assisting homeless people acquire the necessary identification, such as Health Cards, Citizenship and Birth Certificates, or Landing Documentation. City staff are currently working with Street Health and a variety of other agencies to develop a permanent solution to this chronic problem.

(2)Housing Help:

Housing help projects work directly with homeless people to help them find and maintain housing, assist landlords in housing homeless people, match tenants with necessary legal, medical and social support, and provide life skills training, counselling and crisis intervention where necessary. This program is extremely cost effective in that it diverts individuals from the more costly shelter system and into permanent housing.

Working in collaboration with City staff, Housing Help workers have provided essential supports to individuals who have experienced housing crises, particularly in the rooming house sector. They have helped individuals who are being evicted from substandard or illegal accommodation (squats, unlicensed rooming houses, and accommodation where "urgent hazards" related to fire and other unsafe conditions exist) to find immediate accommodation. These emergencies are becoming more and more frequent. For example, in February 1998, housing help workers helped to relocate 25 people from five unlicensed rooming houses. All 25 tenants were successfully re-housed. Effective co-ordination and planning meant that no one ended up in the shelter system or on the street as a result. Similar crises occur every six to eight weeks.

Three housing help projects which have been operating since 1996 are recommended for funding as follows: Mental Health Program Services which works with homeless men ($50,000.00), Anglican Houses "Street Outreach Services" which works with special needs youth ($50,000.00) and the Hispanic Development Council which works with Hispanic youth gangs ($47,500.00). In addition, $15,000.00 to the Rupert Residential Services is recommended for determining gaps in service to vulnerable rooming house tenants, proposing alternate service delivery models, and for moving and emergency support costs for vulnerable people being displaced from unsafe housing.

Staff are also developing a housing help strategy for vulnerable women and children. The "rent bank" pilot project is described in Appendix "C". The project was developed through a series of focus groups with community agencies that work with vulnerable women in danger of eviction due to economic circumstances. This was identified as a priority strategy for the HIF in 1998. A community group to develop and operate the project will be selected through a targeted proposal call.

(3)Innovations and Longer Term Initiatives:

Since 1992, the HIF has been supporting key initiatives that help community agencies develop innovative programs, reach new clients, develop employment skills, help people maintain their housing, and more actively participate in the solutions to their own problems.

Over the past four years the HIF has supported three types of projects: innovative community projects that are unable to get off the ground due to a lack of "seed" or start up funding, new projects that meet emerging needs in the community and where no other funding is available, and existing projects which are underfunded.

Examples of successful projects which were developed previously with HIF support:

(a)a Voice Mail project for homeless or low income people who did not have access to their own telephones. The project has been instrumental in linking hundreds of homeless people to family, jobs and community services. HIF funding was matched by the United Way. The project has evolved to include access to electronic mail;

(b)"Inspirations" provides support to homeless and marginalized women to learn job related skills by starting their own small craft businesses such as jewelry, pottery and other craft products. While these projects do not produce full time jobs they are instrumental in developing skills, enhancing self esteem and self-worth. In 1996/97 for example, 45 women produced goods which were sold at marketing events and at the Prezents of Mind consignment store; and

(c)The Strachan House "Market Garden" project utilized vacant City owned land adjacent to the Home First Society housing project for homeless people. Working in partnership with community gardeners (residents from the Niagara Community area) staff and residents from Strachan House learned how to grow and sell a variety of vegetables and herbs. Not only did tenants of Strachan House learn about market gardening but the project provided an opportunity for tenants and neighbouring residents to work together on a common project thus improving community relations.

Ten projects, as outlined in Appendix "B", are recommended for $160,000.00 in funding. In addition it is recommended that a proposal call be issued to identify recipients for $40,000.00, the balance of the Innovations and Longer Term Initiatives program. Details are outlined in Appendix "C" under "Homeless Innovations"

Capital Leverage Fund:

The Capital Leverage Fund (CLF) was created by the former City of Toronto Council in 1996. This was a one-time allocation of $1,400,000.00 to create a special capital fund to assist non-profit community groups in developing temporary shelter, permanent housing or service facilities for homeless people. Given that the funds were a one-time allocation to support projects to be developed over a number of years, the former City set up the fund as a reserve account outside the annual operating budget.

The intent of the CLF is to bring together the resources of community groups and those of the private and public sectors using City funds to leverage additional capital funds to make projects viable, to provide "equity" leverage in securing mortgages, and to lend credibility to fund-raising campaigns. Funds are provided in the form of forgivable grants and long term no-interest loans.

Selection criteria and the process used to choose projects were finalized after consultation with community groups who work with homeless people. Capital Leverage Fund projects are required to meet the following criteria:

(a) address emergency shelter or service needs or develop long term housing solutions for homeless people;

(b)involve partnerships with other community groups, public and private sector funders and/or faith groups;

(c)include other sources of funding and/or in-kind supports from other parties;

(d)be able to demonstrate ongoing viability;

(e)involve agencies with experience in housing and/or services for homeless people; and

(f)involve people who have experienced homelessness in the planning and/or operation of the project.

Five projects for a total of $500,000.00 in funding have now been completed. Through these community/City initiatives, accommodation is now being provided for more than 100 homeless people.

A sixth project with Dixon Neighbourhood Homes Inc. for 40 units of permanent housing for homeless men and women on the 30 St. Lawrence site is in its final planning stages. A CLF forgivable loan of $400,000.00 makes this project economically viable without ongoing operating subsidies.

The balance of the CLF, $500,000.00, will be used in 1998 to develop a third "Streetcity" model of housing for homeless people. Staff will be reporting back to Council on the progress of these projects.

Conclusions:

It is recommended that the projects listed in Appendix "A" receive a total of $593,500.00 in grant support from the Homeless Initiatives Fund. In addition, it is recommended that $190,000.00, the balance of the Homeless Initiatives Fund budget of $783,500.00, be held for projects to be identified through the targeted proposal calls outlined in Appendix "C",to be determined by the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services once community agencies have been chosen.

City staff have been working closely with community groups involved in these projects to solve growing and complex problems related to homelessness. It is my belief that these projects provide strategic interventions that will help people from becoming homeless, improve access to affordable housing, improve the condition of many homeless people, and provide vital services in the community. Staff will be monitoring each project to ensure that it operates efficiently and that there is no duplication of services. In many cases, my staff are able to link projects up with other resources in the community as well as City resources to improve the provision of services. In the case of the Capital Leverage Fund, City funding acts as a lever for other resources including private sector support, donations, the volunteer efforts of individuals and the co-operation of other community agencies. It is my belief that this comprehensive approach is the most effective way to maximize the use of the resources available in the Homeless Initiatives Fund.

Contact Name:

Joanne Campbell, Tel: 392-6135/Fax: 392-3037.

--------

Appendix A

Agency Name

1997

Approved

Allocation

1998

Amount

Requested

1998

Amount

Recommended

Street Survivors Initiatives:
1. Anishnawbe Health Toronto*

$111,000.00

$111,000.00

$111,000.00

2. Community Information Toronto**

45,000.00

45,000.00

45,000.00

3. Homes First Society (Savard's)

75,000.00

75,000.00

75,000.00

4. Out of the Cold

30,000.00

30,000.00

30,000.00

5. Street Health Community Nursing

Foundation

10,000.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

Sub Total:

$271,000.00

$271,000.00

$271,000.00

Housing Help:
6. Hispanic Development Council

47,500.00

47,500.00

47,500.00

7. Mental Health Program Services

50,000.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

8. Anglican Houses (Street Outreach

Services)

50,000.00

50,000.00

50,000.00

9. Rupert Community Residential Services of Toronto Inc.

10,000.00

15,000.00

15,000.00

Sub Total:

$157,500.00

$162,500.00

$162,500.00

Innovations and Longer Term Initiatives:
10. Central Neighbourhood House

10,000.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

11. Mixed Company (Cobblestone Theatre)

10,000.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

12. Neighbourhood Information Post

10,000.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

13. Open Door Centre and Rooms Registry Service

20,000.00

20,000.00

20,000.00

14. Pape Adolescent Resource Centre

30,000.00

30,000.00

30,000.00

15. Regent Park Community Health Centre

10,000.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

16. St. Christopher House

20,000.00

20,000.00

20,000.00

17. Sistering

20,000.00

20,000.00

20,000.00

18. Sojourn House

20,000.00

20,000.00

20,000.00

19. 761 Development Corporation

(Inspirations)

10,000.00

10,000.00

10,000.00

Sub Total:

$160,000.00

$160,000.00

$160,000.00

Grand Total:

$588,500.00

$593,500.00

$593,500.00

*Anishnawbe Health Toronto is receiving an advance of $55,500.00 per Council approval already obtained. The balance of funds to be issued is $55,500.00

**Community Information Toronto is receiving an advance of $22,500.00 per Council approval already obtained. The balance of funds to be issued is $22,500.00.

--------

Appendix B

Summary of Projects Recommended for Funding

Street Survivors Initiatives:

Anishnawbe Street Patrol:

Funds in the amount of $111,000.00 to operate their Street Patrol, mobile street outreach service to homeless people five evenings per week from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1998, and an additional two evenings per week from January 1, 1998 to April 15, 1998, and from November15,1998 to December 31, 1998.

Community Information Toronto:

Funds in the amount of $45,000.00 to operate the "Street Helpline", a telephone information service offered free to homeless people who need information about community services such as available shelter beds, how to find housing, where inexpensive food or meals are available etc. The Helpline will employ "peer counsellors" who have experienced homelessness.

Homes First Society (Savard's):

Funds in the amount of $75,000.00 to operate "Savard's" a 10 bed innovative housing project for chronically homeless women who have been on the streets and for whom the hostel system does not work.

Out of the Cold:

Funds in the amount of $30,000.00 to assist the "Out of the Cold" program provide better co-ordination of services run by churches involved in their program and to provide educational workshops for volunteers.

Street Health Community Nursing Foundation:

Funds in the amount of $10,000.00 to help homeless people pay the costs of identification they need to access community services.

Housing Help:

Hispanic Development Council:

Funds in the amount of $47,500.00 to prevent homelessness among Hispanic youth by outreach, crisis intervention and family counselling, assistance in maintaining housing, and linkages to appropriate community services.

Mental Health Program Services:

Funds in the amount of $50,000.00 to assist homeless people secure and keep appropriate accommodation by providing necessary supports, linking and referring homeless people to landlords that provide affordable accommodation, and educating and supporting landlords in the preservation of low income housing stock.

Anglican Houses (Street Outreach Services):

Funds in the amount of $50,000.00 to help special needs youth access or maintain housing through working in collaboration with housing and support staff in the community.

Rupert Community Residential Services Toronto Inc.:

Funds in the amount of $15,000.00 to identify services which are not being provided to vulnerable rooming house tenants, propose alternate service delivery models, to provide an emergency tenant relocation fund and to participate in a co-ordinated rooming house response strategy. The tenant relocation fund will be used to assist with first and last month's rent, transportation, moving expenses, storage of belongings, obtaining furnishings and other household items.

Innovations and Longer Term Initiatives:

Central Neighbourhood House:

Funds in the amount of $10,000.00 to operate an electronic e.mail service for homeless people to facilitate their search for employment and contact with social service agencies.

Mixed Company (Cobblestone Theatre):

Funds in the amount of $10,000.00 to be provided to cover the costs of producing educational theatrical and video productions about life on the streets and the search for housing. Projects will include current and former homeless people in the cast and crew of the production.

Neighbourhood Information Post:

Funds in the amount of $10,000.00 to work on an ongoing basis with women and children who are at high risk of becoming homeless due to abusive living situations, job loss, disability, and/or recent cuts in social assistance benefits. The project will work with women to facilitate the formation of a women's support group or "buddy system" which will help them support each other during times of crisis.

Open Door Centre and Rooms Registry:

Funds in the amount of $20,000.00 to be provided for the drop-in's Rooms Registry which assists low income and homeless people in finding clean, affordable housing. In addition, the Open Door Centre will provide workshops on specific housing issues with both landlords and tenants.

Pape Adolescent Resource Centre:

Funds in the amount of $30,000.00 to be provided to the "One Stop Housing and Financial" project to provide peer mentoring to street youths, assist them in finding housing, manage their money, to educate them on the rights and responsibilities of tenants, and to provide housing information and financial management workshops.

Regent Park Community Health Centre:

Funds in the amount of $10,000.00 to train and hire homeless and under housed women who use drop-ins to provide information, referral, support and community education services to peers.

St. Christopher House:

Funds in the amount of $20,000.00 to be provided to continue the drop-in's highly successful community economic development venture with socially isolated adults and homeless aboriginal people.

Sistering:

Funds in the amount of $20,000.00 to be provided to do outreach, linkage and referrals with low income and homeless aboriginal women.

Sojourn House:

Funds in the amount of $20,000.00 to assist refugees and refugee claimants who are living in the shelter system or who are homeless access affordable housing. The project provides funding for a housing co-ordinator to actively provide crisis support, help refugees access public and private sector housing, and provide information on housing legislation and the rights and responsibilities of tenants.

761 Development Corporation ("Inspirations"):

Funds in the amount of $10,000.00 to provide staff support and materials for Inspirations Community Economic Development project with homeless and low income women by developing small businesses and community business projects.

--------

Appendix C

New Projects to Be Selected Through Targeted Proposal Calls

Housing Help "Rent Bank" Pilot Project - $50,000.00:

The concept of a "rent bank" was proposed in 1996 as a result of an Eviction Prevention Forum and has received considerable support in the United States. The intention of this pilot project is to determine the extent to which a small loan and/or grant can keep a family housed, thus diverting them from the shelter system. The project will be developed and implemented by a community group selected through a targeted proposal call. The successful community group will work with a steering committee consisting of community partners with experience in landlord and tenant legislation, mediation, financial counseling, women and housing.

The project will research and develop the project, provide grants/loans, keep financial records, provide other options when a loan/grant is not appropriate (e.g., mediation, counseling), provide on-going contact and follow-up with recipients, track service use, and provide an ongoing evaluation on the effectiveness of the project. A final report with recommendations will be submitted at the end of the project year. Staff are currently working with focus groups to develop detailed operating guidelines for the project.

A targeted proposal call will be issued with a submission deadline of June 30, 1998.

Men's Street Survivors Outreach and Support Project - $50,000.00:

The Male Street Survivor Project is based on the recognition that there are some homeless men who through experience have made a clear decision that they feel safer and more at "home" living in an outside alternative. The concept has evolved from research undertaken by Mental Health Program Services with funding from the 1997 Homeless Initiatives Fund. Experienced researchers held discussions with over 197 of these men in their homes; under bridges, in ravine parklands, on the streets, or in self-constructed domiciles.

The goal of this project is to provide an outreach and support service that is non-judgmental and individually appropriate at any given time. This conclusion was reinforced by service providers who could not assist them within enclosed formal spaces where organizational rules apply. In order to succeed this model must be diverse in its approaches, highly flexible in nature, small in scale and unobtrusive.

The project will be developed and implemented by a community group with support from a steering committee comprised of city staff, and representatives from community agencies who work with this population.

A targeted proposal call will be issued with a submission deadline of June 30, 1998.

Youth Street Survivors Housing Support Project - $50,000.00:

In our experience, although some homeless youth are able to access existing housing stock when they have housing information, many others need more intensive holistic individual support to successfully find and keep housing and jobs and to access health services. This is particularly true of the youth who are actually living on the streets, in parks, in squats or other forms of "sleeping rough". The success of alternative services and street outreach strategies for street youth and the increasing numbers of street youth using services designed for homeless adults demonstrates the need for creative new strategies to work with this "service shy" population.

The Homeless Initiatives Fund plans to issue a targeted Request For Proposal (RFP) for a $50,000.00 pilot project to provide intensive housing help to youth street survivors - youth who live on the streets, in parks or in squats and/or are "service shy" and will be limited to agencies which have demonstrated an ability to reach these youth. In the response to the RFP, the agency will describe the key concepts of the pilot project including descriptions of: the housing help services, relationship of the project to their existing services, relationship with other services which these "service shy" youth sometimes access or could benefit from, the composition and role of the project's steering committee and project's time lines.

A targeted proposal call will be issued with a submission deadline of June 30, 1998.

Homeless Innovations - $40,000.00:

The goal of Homeless Innovations is to utilize the creativity and resources of homeless people and the staff who work with them by providing "seed" or start-up funding for new initiatives. Funding is not available from other sources for new initiatives of this kind. Many of the innovations funded through the Homeless Initiatives Fund have been initiated by homeless or formerly homeless people and have developed into on-going viable projects which provide benefits to a wide range of homeless people. In many cases "seed money" from the HIF attracts funding and/or resources from other organizations.

A call for proposals will be issued for four projects of $10,000.00 each. Funding will be available for one-time only start-up grants that best demonstrate the creativity and involvement of homeless people. The deadline for submissions will be June 30, 1998.

Selection of Projects:

Projects will be selected by a selection committee comprised of City staff from various divisions. In order to be considered, applicants must meet the City's requirements for grant recipients, demonstrate expertise in their respective fields and best meet the selection criteria outlined in the request for proposals (RFP).

11

1998 Commercial Research Grant Recommendations

(Wards 23, 24 and 25 - Midtown, Downtown and Don River)

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached report (May 21, 1998) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism respecting the 1998 Commercial Research Grant recommendations.

--------

(Report dated May 21, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism)

Purpose:

This report recommends the allocation of 1998 Commercial Research Grants.

Source of Funds:

There are sufficient funds to disburse $22,903.00 of the recommended grants in the Municipal Grants Budget. The remaining $7,597.00 will be disbursed in 1999 in accordance with the Program Guidelines and practices in past years. $25,133.00 is included in the 1998 Operating Budget for Commercial Research Grants. $2,230.00 of this amount is required to pay the final instalments of grants approved in 1997, leaving $22,903.00 with which to pay the first instalments of new grants in 1998.

The recommended grants total $30,500.00. Provision to pay the final $7,597.00 will be included in the 1999 Interim Appropriation Estimates.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the following Commercial Research Grants totalling $30,500.00 be approved:

(a)Bloor Yorkville BIA - $15,000.00;

(b)Chinese Chamber of Commerce (East Toronto) Inc. - $1,000.00;

(c)Forest Hill Village BIA - $2,000.00;

(d)Greektown on the Danforth BIA - $2,500.00;

(e)Queen East Business Association - $5,000.00; and

(f)St. Lawrence Neighbourhood BIA - $5,000.00;

(2)the disbursement of the grants be subject to the satisfactory completion of Declaration Forms regarding the adoption of the City of Toronto non-discrimination policy and the other conditions set out in the Commercial Research Program Guidelines (Appendix 1);

(3)the above noted grants be deemed to be in the interests of the municipality; and

(4)the grant request from the Kensington Market Action Committee be denied since it does not comply with the Commercial Research Program Guidelines.

Background:

The Commercial Research Program provides grants to business associations in the former City of Toronto to assist them in hiring professional consultants to undertake research required to plan effective revitalization strategies. The participating business associations must pay at least half of the study costs themselves, and manage the day-to-day operation of the projects.

The City gains public access to the studies that are undertaken. The reports are used to provide research models and information valuable both to other business associations and to City staff working on commercial revitalization and business improvement issues. A list of projects which have been completed since the program was initiated in 1986 and copies of the various studies are available from the Economic Development, Tourism and Culture Department.

The main benefits provided by the Commercial Research Program are that it:

(1)makes it financially feasible for Toronto's smaller BIAs and voluntary business associations to hire professional consultants to assist them with their programming and development;

(2)increases the ability of business associations and BIAs to plan strategically, set priorities, and implement cost-effective business improvement programs;

(3)provides a record of the work undertaken, and a "road map" to guide a business association or BIA over a number of years. This has been particularly useful in cases where there has been a lack of continuity between successive Boards of Management. Economic Development staff have been able to provide new Boards with research and suggestions previously developed for the area, enabling a head start in planning their business improvement programs;

(4)builds a bank of information about retail strips and their markets and suggested strategies for developing the strength of BIA organizations and commercial districts. This information is used both by individual business associations, and by Department staff to better develop commercial policies and work with business associations across the City; and

(5)helps to strengthen the City's small business community, returning the investment made in grants through increased commercial realty and business tax revenues.

The program guidelines and conditions are set out in Appendix 1.

Comments:

(1)1998 Application Process and Program Harmonization:

The Commercial Research Program was developed in the former City of Toronto where it has been in place since 1986. Similar programs were not available in the other former municipalities.

In accordance with the direction provided by Clause No. 8 of Report No. 4 of The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, which Council adopted on April 16, 1998, the program was made available to business associations within the former City of Toronto only in 1998. Staff are evaluating the future of the program as part of the review of grant programs and the support provided to BIAs and business associations across the City with the target of recommending an integrated program for implementation in 1999.

Applications for 1998 Commercial Research Grants were invited from the 55 BIAs and business associations in the former City of Toronto that are on the Economic Development Division's mailing list in December 1997. Applications were received from seven associations.

(2)Recommended 1998 Grants:

The following 1998 Commercial Research Grants are recommended. Each grant represents 50percent of the eligible project costs. The BIAs and business associations are paying for the remainder of the project costs from funds raised from their members.

(a)Bloor Yorkville BIA:

$15,000.00 to contribute towards the cost of a $30,000.00 Urban Design Study. The study results will provide a guide to the BIA in planning streetscape improvements over the next five years.

(b)Chinese Chamber of Commerce (East Toronto) Inc.:

$1,000.00 to contribute towards a $2,000.00, survey of merchants in the Gerrard/Broadview area to identify issues and concerns. The information will be used by this recently formed business association to help it identify priorities for action.

(c)Forest Hill Village BIA:

$2,000.00 to contribute towards a $4,000.00 study of traffic flow patterns along Spadina Road between Montclair Avenue and St. Clair Avenue West. The information will be used to inform the BIA about the impact of various traffic calming measures.

(d)Greektown on the Danforth:

$2,500.00 to contribute towards an $18,000.00 project developing two new marketing niches for the Pape/Danforth area (cooking classes and the promotion of the area's beauty salons and products). Only $5,000.00 of the project costs (professional services) are eligible for support from the program, and therefore a$2,500.00 grant is recommended. The remainder of the budget are project implementation costs such as advertising, printing, administrative support, etc., which are not eligible for support from the program, and must be paid for by the business association.

(e)Queen East Business Association:

$5,000.00 to contribute towards the $10,000.00 cost of developing a strategic action plan for the businesses along Queen Street East between Yonge and River Streets.

(f)The St. Lawrence Neighbourhood BIA:

$5,000.00 to contribute towards the $10,000.00 cost of a streetscape improvement study to guide the BIA in implementing capital improvements in future years.

An application also was received from the Kensington Market Action Committee. However, it was proposed that the required matching funds be provided from a Human Resources Development Canada grant instead of from the business community. This contravenes the program guidelines. Staff are working with the Action Committee, and are investigating other ways of facilitating the project.

As is further described in Appendix 1, Commercial Research Grants are paid in two instalments. The first 75 percent of the grant is provided when the business association indicates that it has paid for its share of the project costs. The final 25 percent is paid at the conclusion of the project after the final report and required documentation has been received. Since the project completion deadline is the March 31 following the approval of the grant, the final instalment usually is paid in the next calendar year after the grant is approved. Therefore, the disbursement of the grants has been budgeted over two years in the past.

Conclusions:

The six Commercial Research Grants recommended in this report all meet the program guidelines, and will contribute to the ability of the participating business associations to plan and implement effective programs for their areas.

Contact Name:

Judy Morgan, Tel: 392-1003/Fax 392-1380, E-mail address, jmorgan1@city.toronto.on.ca.

(A copy of the Appendix 1 referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda of the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on June 1, 1998, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

12

Grant to Comité français de l'hôtel de ville (French Committee of

Toronto City Hall) and Franco Fête (Francophone Festival)

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached report (May 21, 1998) from the Commissioner, Corporate Services recommending a grant to Comité Français de l'hôtel de ville (French Committee of Toronto City Hall) and Franco Fête (Francophone Festival).

--------

(Report dated May 21, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Commissioner of Corporate Services)

Recommendations:

It is recommended that grants in the amount of $23,000.00 for the Comité Français de l'hôtel de ville and $5,000.00 for Franco Fête be approved and that they continue to be administered as they have in the past.

Council Reference/Background/History:

The French Committee was established by Toronto City Council on January 15, 1991 (Clause No.37 of Executive Committee Report No. 5, Appendix A) to act as a liaison between the Francophone community and City Hall in order to highlight the presence of the Francophone Community in the City of Toronto, facilitate the participation of the community in municipal affairs, promote the interests of the community at City Hall, and support the development of municipal services in the French language.

The French Committee's activities include research and consultation on access to French language services in Toronto and Toronto City Hall. Franco Fête, an independent incorporated non-profit organization, hosts an annual event which celebrates French culture in Toronto.

The funds for these grants are contained are included in the consolidated 1998 listing of municipal grants.

Contact Name:

Richard Yampolsky, Tel: 392-1444/Fax: 392-1553.

(A copy of the Appendix A referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda of the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on June 1, 1998, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

13

City of Toronto Support for

761 Community Development Corporation

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached joint report (June 10, 1998) from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services and Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services respecting City of Toronto support to 761 Community Development Corporation.

--------

(Joint Report dated June 10, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services and

Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)

Purpose:

This report recommends a grant of $15,000.00 to the 761 Community Development Corporation (761 C.D.C.) to support its employment and business development activities for persons experiencing long term poverty. In addition, it recommends an expenditure of $10,000.00 for hiring an outside consultant to carry out an organizational review and to recommend an appropriate long term relationship between the 761 C.D.C. and the City.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

The total recommended amount is $25,000.00. Funds are available in the grants contingency account. There are no other financial implications.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)a grant in the amount of $15,000.00 be provided from the grants contingency account to the 761 Community Development Corporation for the purpose of supporting its employment and business development activities among persons experiencing long term poverty and that this amount be in addition to the $10,000.00 previously recommended under the Community Service Grants Program and the $10,000.00 recommended from the Homeless Initiatives Fund;

(2)authority be granted to hire a consultant to conduct a review of the financial and administrative relationships with the 761 C.D.C. and to recommend a sustained and long term financial and administrative structure for the 761 C.D.C., in consultation with staff of the Urban Planning and Development Services, Community and Neighbourhood Services, Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, and the Finance Departments. Current funders and representatives from the Provincial Government will be asked to participate. That a grant in the amount of $10,000.00 be provided from the Grants Contingency account for this purpose. As a matter of first priority, City staff should be directed to report to the Municipal Grants Review Committee on the outcome of this review by September 1998;

(3)the foregoing grant be deemed to be in the interest of the Municipality; and

(4)appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to do what is necessary to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

The development of 761 Queen Street West (owned by the Toronto United Church Council) as a Community Action Centre dedicated to the development of business and employment related programs and activities for persons marginalised in the job market (e.g., homeless persons, psychiatric survivors etc.) was a result of a Church based task force examining the future role of the building in relation to the Church's mission.

The 761 C.D.C. is an organization developed with the assistance of the former City of Toronto which actively seeks out and develops business and employment opportunities for persons experiencing long term poverty. It operates from a building jointly renovated by the former City and the United Church and legally dedicated by way of a ten year agreement to serve as a Community Action Centre for this purpose.

The 761 C.D.C. programming is funded primarily by Federal and foundation dollars. They are seeking a longer term relationship with the City for administrative support as well as programming.

The involvement of the former City of Toronto has its basis in the Report of the Mayor's Committee on Homelessness (1992). Renovations were approved in 1994 by the Council of the former City of Toronto as a Canada Ontario Infrastructure Works project (Clause No. 26 of Executive Committee Report No. 21, September 26 and 27, 1994).

At the end of the construction phase a grant agreement was executed between the Church and the former City committing the Church to maintaining the building for use as a Community Action Centre for a period of ten years.

On this basis, for the past three years, a staff person from Urban Development Services in the former City of Toronto has been assigned full time to assist in the development of the 761 Community Development Corporation as an innovative vehicle through which to work on economic approaches to the issue of long term poverty. This staff assignment was also to shape the relationship and provide the link between the 761 C.D.C. and the City.

In August of 1997, the former Toronto Council discussed the issue of terminating the assignment and replacing it with a grant for a full time Executive Director. Council unanimously adopted the following motions:

(1)That the City at least maintain its current level of support of $100,000.00 over the next year to the 761 Community Development Corporation:

(a)by continuing to provide staff secondment at an approximate value of $65,000.00; and

(b)by endorsing in principle, the provision of the additional $35,000.00.

(2)That the Budget Review Group report to the Executive Committee on September 15, 1997, on the source of funds and details of how the funds would be expended.

(3)That the grant be deemed to be in the interest of the Municipality.

(4)That the City renew its commitment to partnership with the 761 Community Development Corporation as a long term relationship.

(5)That the City incorporate into the Economic Development Strategy a grants program and other support for seed funding that can assist development of new community business initiatives that involve people outside the social-economic mainstream.

Subsequently, the Budget Review Group recommended the following, which was adopted by the former Toronto Council on September 22, 1997:

"That funds in the amount of $35,000.00 be included in the 1998 operating budget as a miscellaneous grant administered by the Grant Review Board to provide an equivalent funding level to the 761 Community Development Corporation."

At that same Council meeting, the following recommendation of the Commissioner of Urban Development Services was also adopted:

"That the Commissioner of Urban Development Services, in consultation with appropriate policy and grant staff, report back to the new City Council prior to the completion of the staff assignment to review options for stabilizing support, particularly support for the position of Executive Director for the community economic development initiatives being undertaken through the 761 Community Development Corporation to support marginalised communities."

This report is intended to fulfil the recommendation with respect to the $35,000.00 miscellaneous grant and to meet the requirement for a staff report with respect to stabilizing support for the organization prior to completion of the staff assignment.

Comments:

Although originally intended to include housing, the project has been developed exclusively as a Community Economic Development (C.E.D.) initiative since the Province cancelled the allocation for the residential component in 1995. The project currently houses the 761 Community Development Corporation as well as the Ontario Council on Alternative Businesses (O.C.A.B.). As well, there are four community businesses originally developed co-operatively by O.C.A.B. and the 761 C.D.C. and now operated separately. Freshstart Cleaning and Maintenance, the Metro Youth Council and other C.E.D. related groups are also located on site.

The prime object of incorporation for the 761 Community Development Corporation is:

"to work for and with persons who experience long term poverty to create opportunities for improving their quality of life through providing assistance in community economic development and employment activities, community development and self-help initiatives, skills training, support for building organizational capacity and operating resources; and through advocacy efforts relating to needs that have been identified by the community."

The 761 C.D.C. staff and Board are to be congratulated on their ability to leverage substantial contributions over the years towards efforts to employ and develop businesses among the large community of people in Toronto who are unable for a variety of reasons to participate in the mainstream economy. It is critical that this capacity be maintained since, as in most large cities, the core of the municipality has historically been home to, or a destination point for, the economically disenfranchised. Failure to address this reality contributes to the economic and social decline so evident in many large cities. Structural changes with respect to downloading of many social costs to the new municipality add a new and compelling reason to support this type of activity.

Over the past years, the 761 C.D.C. received an average of $35,000.00 in grants to support this work from various programs of the former City of Toronto. Both of the previously described minutes of that Council express its intent to see that relationship continue during 1998. Recommendation No.(1) of this report is designed to meet that intent.

During the development and construction phase, the functions of Executive Director have been carried out by staff of Urban Planning and Development Services. The services of that staff person were committed until the end of September of this year. The imminent end of the staff secondment creates a significant budget shortfall in the administration of the organization. This has been valued at $65,000.00 annually, which when added to the $35,000.00 in programming grants, reflects the former Council's $100,000.00 commitment.

At this time there are no available sources of funding outside of the City for the Executive Director salary. The organization receives substantial Federal and foundation contributions, however, they must, under terms of agreement, be used in program delivery with only a small allowance for overhead and administration. This reflects current funding patterns where senior levels of Government purchase delivery services from agencies that are assumed to be able to cover administration costs from other sources.

Although City staff will continue to offer assistance where possible, it is important that the 761C.D.C. be provided with a budget to enable them to recruit a full time and independent Executive Director as soon as possible. However, an organizational review resulting in recommendations regarding long term relations with the City is needed to provide a context for this transition and to identify an appropriate source for the required funds.

It would be invaluable to have this review conducted by a consultant who is familiar with the field as well as funding patterns and the requirements and structures for such an organization. This consultant would have an ability to expedite the work and to examine the various issues with fresh lenses and an independent perspective.

The review would examine matters such as mission and mandate, available resources and long term viability strategies as well as partnership opportunities. For this reason, the proposed review should involve all funders as well as City grants staff in order to arrive at balanced recommendations regarding the City's role in the future. This would be an effective way of meeting the intent of the reporting requirement. When completed, the report will be forwarded to the appropriate committee.

Appropriate staff should be authorized to assist the 761 C.D.C. in this process and other funders should be encouraged to participate.

The additional grant requirements for the 761 C.D.C. include the $15,000.00 in additional program support and $10,000.00 to retain a consultant, for a total of $25,000.00. Funds are recommended to be provided through the grants contingency budget.

Conclusions:

The 761 Community Development Corporation is engaged in the development of employment and business opportunities among persons and communities outside the mainstream economy (including homeless persons and psychiatric survivors). These activities have their basis in policy initiatives of the former City of Toronto and are organized and run primarily from a building renovated under authority of that Council with Municipal funds in part. An agreement exists between the United Church and the former City of Toronto dedicating the building for this purpose for a ten-year period.

In recognition of the fact that the former City of Toronto has supported the 761 Community Development Corporation in past years by way of an average grant contribution of $35,000.00, this report recommends the making of a further grant of $15,000.00 beyond the $10,000.00 recommended from the Toronto General Grant funds, and the $10,000.00 recommended from the Homeless Initiatives Fund.

The report also seeks authority to retain a consultant to conduct a review of various matters regarding the 761 C.D.C. with participation by appropriate City staff and representatives from other funding agencies and particularly to prepare recommendations to Council on an appropriate relationship between the 761 C.D.C. and the City in the future.

Contact Name:

Larry King, Toronto City Hall Office, Tel: 392-0622.

14

Ontario Volleyball Association, World Pro-Beach Volley Ball Event

- Special Event Grant

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached report (June 8, 1998) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, respecting a Special Event Grant for the Ontario Volleyball Association World Pro-Beach Volley Ball Event.

--------

(Report dated June 8, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism)

Purpose:

This report responds to the request by the Ontario Volleyball Association for a special event grant from the City of Toronto. Funds would be used to offset event expenses incurred in hosting the World Pro-Beach Volleyball Tournament at Woodbine Beach Park and Ashbridges Bay Park from June 17 to 21, 1998.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the Ontario Volleyball Association receive financial support from the City of Toronto; and that an appropriate level of funding given the constraints on the Contingency Fund would be $10,000.00. This recommendation is subject to the approval of the Use of Contingency Fund Report currently before the Municipal Grants Review Committee.

Council Reference/Background/History:

A request for support for the World ProVolleyball Event was received by the Mayor's Office and forwarded to the Toronto Park's and Recreation Department. The Department had provided limited support for the event in 1997. A Recreation Grant application was requested in April but the deadline of March 2, 1998, had passed. This request was forwarded to the Municipal Grants Review Committee. A staff report was requested on this special event grant from the Ontario Volleyball Association. All accompanying correspondence is attached as Appendix A.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

The Ontario Volleyball Association is working with Volleyball Canada and the Federation Internationale de Volleyball to host this international World Pro Beach Volleyball Tournament at Toronto's Woodbine Beach Park and Ashbridges Bay Park. This event builds on the very successful Labatt Blue Pro Beach Tour event which took place in the same location on June 19 - 22, 1997. This year's event is an international stop which is part of the World circuit leading up to the Olympics. This sport will become an Olympic qualifying event in 1999 and 2000 leading up to the Sydney Olympics, and presents a good opportunity to begin to market Toronto to the world.

The budget for this event is over $1,000,000.00 and is funded almost entirely by corporate support. There are no admission fees but the event is expected to bring in a substantial amount of revenue to the area. The event will be covered by C.B.C. and televised in over 100 countries.

The World Pro Beach Volleyball Event provides an excellent opportunity to profile the City and its support for World Class events to a worldwide audience.

Conclusion:

The World Pro-Beach Volleyball Event is beneficial to the City and the local community and is worthy of support.

Contact name:

Cathi Forbes:, Tel: 395-6192.

(A copy of the Appendix A referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of Council with the Supplementary Agenda of the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on June 11, 1998, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

15

Process for Disbursing Grants to Property Owners for

Termite Control

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, deferred consideration of this Clause to the next regular meeting of City Council to be held on July 29, 1998.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached report (June 5, 1998) from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services respecting the process for disbursing grants to property owners for termite control.

--------

(Report dated June 5, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services)

Purpose:

This report sets out a process for disbursing grants to property owners under the Termite Control Program.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications:

Funds in the amount of $24,000.00 are available in the approved 1998 Consolidated Grants Program Budget for termite control grants, which is the same level that was provided in 1997.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services be authorized to process grants for termite control, to a maximum of $500.00 per property owner, upon the terms set out in this report. Funds in the amount of $24,000.00 for this purpose are available in the approved 1998 Consolidated Grants Program Budget; and

(2)the appropriate City Officials be authorized and directed to do what is necessary to give effect to Recommendation No. (1).

Council Reference/Background History:

This report describes the Termite Control Program, carried forward from the former City of Toronto, including criteria currently applied by staff in administering the program. As funds for the program are included in the Consolidated Grants Program Budget, the Municipal Grants Review Committee must approve the process by which these funds will be disbursed in 1998. At this point 25 applications are waiting to be processed under this program.

Under the Termite Control Program, individual grants of up to $500.00 are available to property owners for termite treatment where housing program staff have observed active termite infestation. Consistent with the transitional policy for grant programs in 1998, these grants are available only within the boundaries of the former City of Toronto. Staff will report back on whether the program should be expanded to the entire City area in 1999, as part of a broader review of termite control and housing programs being undertaken.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

Property damage due to termite infestation has been a serious problem in Toronto for many years. It is estimated that 18 percent of city blocks in the former City of Toronto have had properties treated for termites. We are also aware of termite activity in other parts of the new City. Termites affect mostly older and more affordable housing, making termite control an important conservation issue, and an important aspect of housing rehabilitation.

The Termite Control Program was created by the former City of Toronto to protect properties from the structural damage associated with termite infestations. Under the program, Housing staff and Building Inspection staff work collaboratively to encourage and, where necessary, require owners to control termites. Housing staff are pro-active in providing advice to property owners, and termite control grants where appropriate. Building Inspection staff are responsible for enforcing termite by-laws to require treatment where necessary.

Termite control can include chemical treatment of the soil and elimination of wood-soil contact around a property. The current technology for termite control focuses on the use of a termiticide in conjunction with wood-soil separation to protect individual properties from underground termite colonies. As an incentive to undertake the treatment and wood-soil separation, which can cost $2,000.00 or more for a property owner, City Housing staff can issue grants of up to $500.00.

The current process for approving grants under this program is described in Appendix 1.

For the last several years, the Urban Entomology Program of the University of Toronto has been pioneering a new method of termite control. This method, called "Trap-Treat-Release" relies on small amounts of chemical and the social behaviour of termites to attack underground colonies, thereby suppressing or eliminating them. Traditional control methods use significant amounts of chemical to protect properties, but do not attack the source of infestation. Under funding agreements with some of the former municipalities, the University of Toronto has been testing this method across most of the new City area. While the results to date are very encouraging, the method must undergo regulatory review and product development before it will be commercially available. Staff will report back to Council on the progress of this research and the implications for the City's termite control program.

Conclusions:

In the transition year of 1998, we propose to continue processing grants for termite control under the procedures outlined in the Appendix, and request confirmation of the Commissioner's Authority to approve and disburse grants from the Consolidated Grants program Budget, based on the recommendations of Housing Program staff.

Contact Name:

Joanne Campbell, Tel: 392-6135/Fax: 392-3037.

--------

Appendix 1

The termite control grant is administered as a first-come, first-served, one-time grant available to property owners in the former City of Toronto, under the following criteria:

Program Criteria:

(1)Maximum Grant - 50 percent of actual costs of termiticide treatment and breaking wood-to-soil contact to $500.00.

(2)Application must be supported by two competitive bids from qualified pest control operators for termiticide treatment and two competitive bids from contractors on breaking wood-soil contact as required.

(3)Only chemicals toxic to termites and registered for use by Federal and Provincial authorities are eligible for reimbursement, currently Dursban TC (chlorpyrifos), Dragnet (permethrin), Purge System 22R (propoxur) and Timbor (disodium octoborate tetrahydrate).

Application Process:

(1)Property owner requests termite inspection.

(2)Housing Program staff inspect and determine evidence of termite activity and risk of termite infestation.

(3)Application received, reviewed and recommended by Housing Program staff.

(4)Grant is approved by Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services, or designate.

(5)Applicant arranges for soil treatment (and wood soil work where applicable).

(6)Applicant requests payment by submitting final invoice and completion certificate issued by the pest control operator.

(7)Funds disbursed after Housing Program staff inspect and accept completed work.

16

Toronto Heritage Fund Grant Application -

427 Bloor Street West (Trinity St. Paul Church)

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached report (June 9, 1998) from the Acting Managing Director, Toronto Historical Board, respecting an increase in the Toronto Heritage Fund grant for 427 Bloor Street West.

--------

(Report dated June 9, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Acting Managing Director of the Toronto Historical Board)

Purpose:

To assist the owner to complete necessary restoration as part of a five-year phased restoration project.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

Funds are provided through the Toronto Heritage Fund.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the Toronto Heritage Fund Application for 427 Bloor Street West, for an increased $10,000.00 from the previously recommended sum of up to $35,000.00 to support an increased scope of restoration that includes the north-east and north west tower roof, be approved;

(2)the grant be conditional on the Board of Trustees entering into a Restoration Grant Agreement prepared by the City Legal Department in consultation with the Managing Director of the Toronto Historical Board; and

(3)the Trustees ensure that the Board's involvement in the project is suitably recognized.

Background:

The property at 427 Bloor Street West, Trinity St. Paul Church, was designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act by By-law No. 166-80, passed by City Council on February 4, 1980.

On April 29, 1998, William W. Small, Chair, Board of Trustees, Trinity-St. Paul's United Church, wrote requesting an increase in the grant from the Toronto Heritage Fund to cover costs for (1)re-roofing both towers with red slate, (2) new gutters and downspouts, (3) masonry repointing on both towers, and (4) repair of decorative woodwork at a total cost of $170,000.00. The grant increase request is based on completing work previously planned for 1999 this year. Therefore, the request is for the cost of the 1998 restoration work of $135,000.00 (including a previously approved grant for $35,000.00), plus the increased scope of work for $55,000.00 (including a requested grant of $10,000.00) for a total of $170,000.00 of construction cost. Allowing the work to occur at one time would allow a cost savings to the applicant.

At its meeting of May 20, 1998, the Toronto Historical Board adopted the staff recommendation that this property receive additional financial support from the Toronto Heritage Fund.

Discussion:

The Church's Board of Trustees is undertaking a five-year restoration and renovation program. The work is being funded through a capital fund raising campaign, with pledges paid over five years. Because the funding will be spread out, the work has been carried out in phases. Five phases have been identified. In 1996-1997, Phases I and II were completed with the support of Toronto Heritage Fund grants of $7,000.00 and $25,000.00, respectively. The recently approved grant of $35,000.00 and the request are Phase III and IV to be completed in 1998. The current application is for PhaseIV and is a request for a Toronto Heritage Fund grant of $10,000.00. The church entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City of Toronto last year.

The scope of work proposed by the architect is as follows:

"The work will entail re-roofing both tower roofs with red slate and shaped metal hip detailing to match the roof over the centre entrance. The roof work will also include new gutters and down pipes, or in the case of the north-east tower, spigots. In addition, we propose that complete repointing of the masonry take place on the east face of the south-east tower as it is exhibiting deterioration. As well, the upper area, all four sides, of the north-east tower will be repointed, as will the stones at the sides of the entry steps. Finally, the work will include making good any deteriorated woodwork, including the south-east entry doors, and refinishing the same. There is to be a moderate bit of glazing work to be carried out on both towers."

The Toronto Historical Board views the work as necessary to ensure the continued preservation of the building. Staff recommends that continued support is warranted given the site's high visibility and diverse community programming.

The grant therefore would help make good the existing roofing on the north west tower. We understand that the cost of repairing the roof in red slate exceeds $55,000.00.

Staff recommends the additional grant of $10,000.00 to support the restoration of the significant architectural feature of the red slate roofing at the north west tower.

Contact Name:

Winston Bridgman, Heritage Toronto, Tel: 392-6827, ext. 238/Fax: 392-6834.

17

Amendments to Bill 16 - Small Business and

Charities Protection Act, 1998

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, amended this Clause by adding thereto the following:

"It is further recommended that the Minister of Finance be requested to extend the July15,1998, tax ratio setting deadline by 30 days for the City of Toronto.")

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 16, 1998) from the Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force:

Recommendation:

The Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force on June 15, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and City Council that the Minister of Finance be requested to issue an order for the City of Toronto extending the deadline for the adoption of capping and any optional new classes from 30 to 60 days after the return of the assessment roll.

Background:

The Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force had before it a report (June 10, 1998) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer providing information regarding the adopted motions to amend Bill16, Small Business and Charities Protection Act, 1998, which received second reading on June2,1998, and had hearings by the Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs on June3, 1998.

The Task Force also had before it a News Release issued by the Province on June 11, 1998, titled "Bill 16 Becomes Law - Small Business Jobs and Charities Protected".

--------

(Report dated June 10, 1998, addressed to the

Assessment and Tax Policy Tax Force from the

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer)

Purpose:

This report provides information regarding the adopted motions to amend Bill 16, the Small Business and Charities Protection Act, 1998, which received second reading on June 2, 1998 and had committee hearings on June 3, 1998. The hearings were held by the Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that:

(1)the Minister of Finance be requested to issue an order for the City of Toronto extending the deadline for the adoption of capping and any optional new classes from 30 to 60 days after the return of the assessment roll; and

(2)this report be received for information.

Background:

The "Small Business and Charities Protection Act, 1998" received Second Reading on June 2, 1998. It was then forwarded to the Standing Committee on Finance and Economic Affairs (SCFEA) for hearings. On June 3, 1998, SCFEA adopted motions to amend Bill 16. The Chair of the Assessment and Tax Policy Tax Force and the Chief Financial Officer attended the hearing to present the City's concerns regarding Bill 16 and other reassessment issues to the SCFEA. A copy of the Chief Financial Officer's briefing material is attached (Appendix 1).

Comments:

Bill 16 amends the Assessment Act, the Municipal Act, the Education Act and other statues relating to local government financing. Most of the adopted motions provide technical measures to ensure smooth application of legislation in Bill 16.

The following are the significant motions to amend Bill 16:

(1)Extending the Deadline for Adopting Optional Classes:

The motions amending clause 2 (3.2) (a) and subsection 2 (3.3) of the Assessment Act allow municipalities to request the Minister of Finance to extend the deadline from 30 days after the roll return to 60 days for the adoption of new classes.

Impact:

The Minister of Finance will need to be requested to extend the deadline for the City of Toronto for the adoption of new classes due to the change in the dates of the Council meeting to July 21st and23rd for the adoption of tax policies and the passing of the levying by-law for 1998.

(2)Fixed Assessment on Golf Courses:

This amending motion amends subsection 23 (9) of the Assessment Act to ensure that golf courses with fixed assessments do not receive tax reductions and that fixed assessments will be adjusted so that municipalities will receive the same amount of tax from these golf courses after reassessment. The tax is subject to annual changes in the tax rate.

Impact:

The City will receive an equivalent amount of taxes from golf courses with fixed assessments.

(3)Phase-in of Assessment-Related Increases and Decreases:

Amending motions clarify subsections 372.1 (4), (5), (6) and (7) of the Municipal Act so that the technical formulae for determining assessment-related changes for local and education taxes includes amalgamation-related changes in the calculation.

Impact:

None. This was assumed in the preliminary tax impact calculations.

(4)Phase-in of Assessment-Related Changes for Specific Property Classes:

Subsection 372.1 (9) of the Municipal Act will be amended by motions that clarify the calculation of phase-ins for properties in the farmlands and managed forest property classes.

Impact:

None. This was assumed in the preliminary tax impact calculations.

(5)Phase-in of Assessment-Related Changes for Subclasses:

The motions add paragraphs 6 and 7 to subsection 372.1 (9) of the Municipal Act. The amendments clarify that for a subclass, where a tax reduction applies, the assessment for 1998 shall be reduced for the determination of assessment-related changes.

Impact:

None. This was assumed in the preliminary tax impact calculations.

(6)Rebates for Charities in Other Classes:

This amendment adds the new paragraph 2.1 to subsection 442.1 of the Municipal Act, which now permits municipalities to rebate taxes to charities or similar organizations located in residential or multi-residential property class. Rebates to charities in these classes were not included in the original provisions of the Bill.

Impact:

Organizations occupying residential and multi-residential properties are not affected by the elimination of the Business Occupancy Tax, as is the case with organizations occupying commercial properties. A tax rebate would provide such organizations with a financial benefit they did not previously enjoy, with direct funding consequences to the City.

(7)Payment of Rebates for Charities in Instalments:

The amendments to subsection 442.1 (4) of the Municipal Act allow municipalities, starting in 2000, to match the payment of rebates to charities and similar organizations with tax instalment dates. The municipality may pay the rebate instalment to the charity at least 21 days before the tax instalment is due, and each rebate instalment must be the same percentage of each tax instalment. Charities will receive the same amount of rebate under the instalment method as they would under the existing provisions in the Bill.

Impact:

The original provisions of Bill 16 required municipalities to make interim rebates to charities by January 15, prior to tax collection. The option of paying of rebates to charities in instalments 21 days before the due date still requires municipalities to issue rebates prior to tax collection and will be administratively more expensive. Payment by instalments will result in a reduced cash flow impact in comparison to paying rebates semi-annually. However, any cash flow savings resulting from paying by instalments may be offset by increased administrative costs.

(8)Extending the Deadline to Choose Capping:

This motion amends subsections 447.3 (5) and (6) of the Municipal Act to permit the Minister of Finance, at the request of the municipality, to extend the time for another 30 days beyond the first 30 days after the return of the assessment roll for deciding on the usage of capping on multi-residential, commercial and/or industrial property classes

Impact:

Same as Item (1) above.

(9)Complementary Amendment:

This motion adds the words "Municipal Act" at the end paragraph 1 of subsection 257.2.1 (3) of the Education Act to signify that the sections mentioned in this paragraph belong to the Municipal Act.

Impact:

None.

(10)Setting Education Tax Rates for Subclasses:

This complementary amendment to subsection 257.12.1 (9.1) of the Education Act requires municipalities to set education tax rates for subclasses.

Impact:

None. This was assumed in the preliminary tax impact calculations.

(11)Extending Appeal Deadline for Ontario Hydro:

This motion amends subsection 52 (15) of the Power Corporation Act to extend deadline for Ontario Hydro's appeals from 21 days to 90 days. This is consistent with appeal time frame for other taxpayers.

Impact:

None.

Conclusion:

The Small Business and Charities Protection Act, 1998 received second reading on June 2, 1998. The amendments contained in the adopted motions will be included in Bill 16 when it is debated during third reading. Once Bill 16 receives Royal Assent, assessment rolls will be returned to municipalities.

The further delay in the return of the assessment roll has required a change in the dates of the Council meeting to July 21st and 23rd for the adoption of tax policies and the passing of the levying by-law for 1998. As a result, it is recommended that Council request the Minister of Finance to extend the deadline for the City of Toronto from 30 days to 60 days after the roll return for the adoption of capping and/or new classes.

Contact Name:

Bill Wong392-9148

Lynne Ashton397-4203

--------

Appendix 1

Small Business and Charities Protection Act, 1998 (Bill 16)

Limiting Budgetary Increases to Uncapped Classes:

(i)this was not originally contemplated during the announcement of capping commercial, industrial and multi-residential property classes. Section 447.19(3) limits tax increase phase-ins to 2.5 percent of the 1997-level taxes and effectively handcuffs municipalities by requiring budgetary increases to be funded by the uncapped classes. This is too restrictive and would not address increases due to unforeseen circumstances;

(ii)a common theme in many new pieces of legislation refers to enhancing municipal decision making and autonomy. Yet by not providing municipalities with the ability to determine how budgetary tax increases can be funded pre-empts municipal autonomy on the matter; and

(iii)if this type of restriction is still desirable on the part of the Province, it is suggested that budgetary increases be shared by all classes, based on the proportion of CVA for that class, to the total CVA for the municipality.

Cost Related to the Delayed Return of the Assessment Roll:

(i)due to further delay in the return of the assessment roll, the Province should provide assurance that there shall be funding to offset the loss in interest revenue and or the cost of borrowing.

Optional Classes - Commercial/Industrial:

(i)Section 1 amends Section 2 of the Assessment Act which provides for optional classes to be prescribed by regulation. The regulations should include in the optional classes a separate class for small/strip retail class;

(ii)a new approach to providing tax relief to charities and similar organizations may be beyond the immediate scope of the review of Bill 16. However, there is clearly a need to amend the way in which charities and similar organizations are to receive tax relief. We would want to work with the Province to put in place a new system to be available no later than by the next reassessment;

(iii)as an alternative, a subclass for charities and similar organizations, including provincially-determined definitions and/or criteria, should be created within the existing commercial property class. Municipalities should be given flexibility with respect to the percentage reduction to be applied to the tax rate.

Assessment Administration:

(i)municipalities using the capping mechanism, in spite of paying for the function of property assessment, must now maintain and update the old 1997 assessment roll. Municipalities will be forced to perform part of the assessment function by keeping tabs on vacancies, location of charities and similar organizations, recalculation of "frozen" assessment values for additions, renovations and increases and decreases in tenancy in commercial and industrial properties. Municipalities opting for the capping provision should not be expected to take on the responsibility for such roll maintenance and updating, particularly when this function has been a provincial responsibility;

(ii)we recommend that the Province continue to maintain and update assessment records pertaining to the identification of tenants in commercial and industrial properties; and

(iii)Section 447.24(15) requires municipalities to give the owner of a property a listing showing the business taxes levied for 1997. The Bill should be amended so that a listing should be made available to property owners, upon request.

Rebates to Charities - Timing of Payments:

(i)rebates should be paid to charities in the month following the last instalment date for each tax bill (interim and final); and

(ii)municipalities should not have to fund rebate payments prior to receiving the tax payments relating to the rebates. This is problematic especially in the 1999 and subsequent years when municipalities would have to finance this rebate before collecting property taxes.

Other Concerns

Ontario Property Assessment Corporation:

(i)there has been much concern expressed about the quality and accuracy of the new assessments. One of the first orders of business for the new corporation should be conducting an audit and review of the 1996 values and methodology across the province; and

(ii)the City of Toronto will pay an estimated $25 million for the operation and function of the Ontario Property Assessment Corporation (OPAC). For this amount or approximately 1/5 of the OPAC's budget, the City does not have a representative on the board. For this level of support, the City should have representation on the board.

Assessment Averaging:

(i)prior to the three year averaging the Province should review the need for a longer period in which to average assessment values, particularly for commercial and industrial properties. Market cycles for these types of properties tend to be greater than the proposed three-year period.

Tenant Protection Act:

(i)a number of recommendations pertaining to the Tenant Protection Act and the proposed regulations will be forwarded to the Province. Including among the recommendations are:

(a)reduce the tax decrease threshold for automatic rent reductions to 2.5 percent;

(b)ensure that automatic rent reductions are applied to the actual and maximum rents; and

(c)expand the options for serving notices to tenants of automatic rent reductions.

Heads and Beds:

(i)the Province should change legislation for the taxation of public hospitals, universities and colleges, and correctional institutions so that these properties pay their fair share of property taxes according to their assessed values.

Assistance to Seniors and Disabled:

(i)a tax deferral program should be expanded to provide relief to a level greater than assessment-related tax increases. All tax relief programs for seniors and disabled should be administered by the Province.

18

Appointments to the Boards of Management for

Business Improvement Areas and Amendments to the

(former Toronto) Municipal Code Chapter 20,

Business Improvement Areas - Various Wards

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the following report (June 15, 1998) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism:

Purpose:

Changes to membership of Boards of Management for Business Improvement Areas require Council approval and a by-law amendment. Attached is Schedule A detailing the amendments to (former Toronto) Municipal Code, Chapter 20 and Appendix 1 listing the names of the nominees to be appointed.

Source of Funds:

No funds required. Business Improvement Area operating budgets are raised by a special levy on members and will be brought forward in a separate report for approval.

Recommendations:

"It is recommended that:

(1)in accordance with the elections held at the Business Improvement Area Annual General Meeting, amendments be made to Schedule A Individual Boards of Management, of the (former Toronto) Municipal Code Chapter 20, Business Improvement Areas as set out in the attached Schedule A. These changes are specific to Number of Members and Members Needed for Quorum and are highlighted by "Changes From and To";

(2)Council appoint the nominees listed in Appendix 1 of this report to the Board of Management for Bloor/Bathurst-Madison, Eglinton Way and Upper Village Business Improvement Areas. The term of office is to expire on November 30, 2000, or as soon thereafter as successors are appointed. Each of the named nominees meets the requirements of Section 220 of the Municipal Act, as amended by Bill 106.

(3)the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto."

Comments:

Following the election held at the Annual General Meeting of Upper Village Business Improvement Area, amendments are required to the number of members and members needed for quorum. These amendments must be reflected in Schedule A Individual Boards of Management of the (former Toronto) Municipal Code Chapter 20, Business Improvement Areas.

The Board of Management of the Bloor/Bathurst-Madison Business Improvement Area has requested that the size of their Board be increased from eight to ten. The nominees to be appointed are Mike Chronopoulos and Daniel Quintas. The quorum should be changed from four to five.

The Board of Management of the Corso Italia Business Improvement Area has requested that the size of their Board be decreased from twelve to ten, due to the resignations of Ms. Ellen Vivacqua and Mr. Joseph Chiaravalloti. The quorum should be changed from six to five.

The Board of Management of the Eglinton Way Business Improvement Area has requested that the size of their Board be increased from nine to ten. The nominee to be appointed is Boden Buczko. The quorum should remain at five.

Conclusions:

These amendments should be reflected in Schedule A, Individual Boards of Management of the (former Toronto) Municipal Code Chapter 20, Business Improvement Areas.

The nominees listed in Appendix 1 of this report should be appointed to the Business Improvement Area, Boards of Management. The terms of office are to expire on November 30, 2000, or as soon thereafter as successors are appointed. Each of the named nominees meets the requirements of Section 220 of the Municipal Act, as amended by Bill 106.

Contact Name:

Ingrid Girdauskas, (tel.) 392-1134, (fax) 392-0675, (e-mail) igirdaus@city.toronto.on.ca.

--------

Schedule A

Business Improvement Areas

Individual Boards Of Management

Name ofBy-lawMembers

Business WhichNumberCouncil MembersNeeded

ImprovementDesignatesofFor

AreaAreaMembersNumberWardQuorum

ChangedChanged

FromToFrom To

Bloor/Bathurst

- Madison808-83 8 7 1Midtown44

Corso Italia807-831210 1Davenport65

Eglinton Way662-86 910 1North Toronto55

Upper Village810-831210 1North Toronto65

--------

APPENDIX 1

Bloor/Bathurst-Madison BIA

Mike ChronopoulosSweet Fantasies

398 Bloor St. W.

Toronto, Ont. M5S 1X4

Daniel QuintasInsomnia

563 Bloor St. W.

Toronto, Ont. M5S 1Y6

Eglinton Way BIA

Boden BuczkoEdward Jones Investments

563 Eglinton Ave. W.

Toronto, Ont. M5N 1B5

Upper Village BIA

Tony BellissimoBellissimo Men's Clothier

882 Eglinton Ave. W.

Toronto, Ont. M6C 2B6

George CalabreseRoss Dixon Financial Services

980 Eglinton Ave. W.

Toronto, Ont. M6C 2C5

John CautilloSette Mezzo

936 Eglinton Ave. W.

Toronto, Ont. M6C 2C2

Ron Daiter932 Eglinton Ave. W.

Toronto, Ont. M6C 2C2

Reno Dell'agnesePenne from Heaven

916 Eglinton Ave. W.

Toronto, Ont. M6C 2C2

David EisenbergPerfect Portraits

1056 Eglinton Ave. W.

Toronto, Ont. M6C 2C5

Brian LissLiss Gallery

978 Eglinton Ave. W.

Toronto, Ont. M6C 2C5

Roman PerelshteinDaiter's

932 Eglinton Ave. W.

Toronto, Ont. M6C 2C2

Bonnie PlecashToronto Dominion Bank

846 Eglinton Ave. W.

Toronto, Ont. M5N 1G1

19

Province of Ontario Support for the

1998 Caribana Festival and Parade

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the following joint report (June 19, 1998) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer:

Purpose:

To inform Council of the proposed cooperative arrangements between the Province of Ontario and the City of Toronto regarding mutual support for the 1998 Caribana Festival and Parade, and to obtain authority to enter into an agreement with the Province regarding the administration and disbursement of the provincial funding for this event.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications, Impact Statement:

City Council has approved $353,500.00 to support the 1998 Caribana Festival and Parade. The Province of Ontario wishes to provide financial support for the Festival and Parade in an amount of $353,000.00. The total municipal and provincial support available will be $706,500.00. Respecting its funding support, the Province wishes to use the same conditions and accountability mechanism as adopted by City Council. It has therefore proposed that, in order to avoid duplication of effort, its funding support be paid to and administered by the City. An agreement between the City and the Province setting out the responsibilities of the parties including how the funds are to be disbursed has been prepared. This is a positive development as it aligns the City and Provincial governments on the same direction in supporting this major festival.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)authority be granted for the City to enter into agreement with the Province of Ontario with respect to the administration and disbursement by the City of the Provincial funding for the purposes of receiving a grant in the amount of $353,000.00 for the 1998 Caribana Festival and Parade;

(2)the effective date of the agreement be June 15, 1998; and

(3)the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

At its meeting on April 16, 1998, City Council adopted, as amended, Report No. 5 of the Strategic Planning and Priorities Committee, entitled "Financial Support to the Caribbean Cultural Committee and Caribana". This report recommended allocating a grant in the amount of $353,500.00 for Caribana Festival and Parade subject to specific conditions aimed at ensuring sound financial controls, management practices and accountability for the use of public funds by the Caribbean Cultural Committee. It also recommended examining approaches for multi-year funding to stabilize this annual Festival.

Further, the report recommended establishing the Caribana Festival Support Group to act as an oversight body for:

(i)the development and implementation of policies and programs by the CCC;

(ii)the financial administration and control of public and private sector funding dedicated to the CCC;

(iii)the process of organizational restructuring and change being developed by the CCC;

(iv)the allocation of appropriate financing to the mas bands and cultural producers by the CCC; and

(v)the meeting of conditions stipulated by the City of Toronto in its support for the Caribana Parade and Festival.

The CFSG is now chaired by the Honourable Lincoln Alexander and includes representation from the CCC executive, the CCC Advisory Board (including its chair, MPP Alvin Curling), representatives of the mas bands and cultural producers and the Province of Ontario. It is also supported by City staff, particularly the Commissioner, Economic Development, Culture and Recreation, the Finance Department and the Access and Equity Centre.

As a member of the CFSG, the Province of Ontario has approached the City seeking a common approach to supporting the Caribana Festival and Parade. Since it wishes to use the same conditions for its funding support as are being used by the City, the Province has proposed that its funding for Caribana be paid to and administered by the City. Meetings have taken place between City and Provincial staff and an agreement has been drafted which sets out the details of the administration and disbursement of the Provincial funding by the City. The term of the agreement is June 15, 1998 to March 31, 1999.

Once signed, the Province will pay the amount of $353,000.00 to the City of Toronto and the City will have the authority to release these funds to the CCC and the mas bands/cultural producers upon compliance with the conditions for disbursement and in accordance with the disbursement schedule attached to the agreement.

Terms and Conditions Applied to Receipt of the Provincial Grant:

As stated above, the Province wishes to use the same conditions Council adopted in providing funding to the Caribana Festival and Parade. These conditions require the CCC to implement sound financial controls and management practices, undertake a debt retirement strategy and initiate a process for organizational change. To ensure implementation of Council conditions, the CCC is required to report monthly through its Chief Executive Officer on its financial status, indicating cash-flow projections and variances, in order to receive installments on the grant approved by Council. These reports are submitted to the CFSG which must be satisfied with the CCC's performance before authorizing the release of any funding.

The agreement between the City and the Province of Ontario will set out the same process in addition to the three separate conditions previously established by the Ministry of Economic Development, Tourism and Trade. These conditions required the CCC to:

(i)appoint a Chief Executive Officer to administer and manage the day-to-day operations of the Caribana Festival;

(ii)produce a business plan, through its CEO, that is satisfactory to the Advisory Board; and

(iii)establish a mechanism or structure for the clear accountability for the use of the provincial grant.

The CCC has met these conditions and, as a result, the Province of Ontario will release funding for the 1998 Caribana to the City.

Administration of the Grant:

To ensure adherence to the conditions applied by City Council and which relate specifically to the third condition adopted by the Province, the Province has proposed that its funding for the 1998 Caribana Parade and Festival be paid to and administered by the City. This will reinforce the City's approach to working with the CCC and will underscore the importance of the CCC having sound financial management practices and initiating organizational restructuring activities.

As such, the Province is satisfied with the CFSG as a mechanism of accountability and financial control. In this context, the records and reports required by the Province to provide evidence of due diligence are the same as those which the City requires the CCC to provide to the CFSG. In addition to ensuring financial controls and organizational accountability, it provides a common mechanism for demonstrating success in meeting conditions applicable to funding. This will eliminate dual reporting requirements on the CCC and enable the Province and the City to work together to support this year's Caribana activities. Given both the Ministry of Economic Development, Tourism and Trade and the City's interest in providing multi-year funding commitments to the annual Caribana Parade and Festival, this is a timely partnership which may help to develop a common approach to future funding for this activity.

Conclusion:

Toronto City Council has adopted recommendations to provide funding in the amount of $353,000.00 to the 1998 Caribana Parade and Festival. To ensure accountability in the use of these funds, City Council authorized the establishment of the Caribana Festival Support Group which is accountable to Council for the administration of funds to the CCC. The City has been approached by the Province of Ontario through the Ministry of Economic Development, Tourism and Trade which wishes to provide funding in the amount of $353,000.00 for Caribana. Should the City agree to administer these funds on behalf of the Province, this will increase the funds available for Caribana to $706,500.00.

An agreement setting out the terms and conditions on which the Provincial funding will be administered has been drafted by the Province and reviewed by staff in legal, finance and the Access and Equity Centre. The Chief Administrative Officer has also been consulted on the development of this report and concurs with the recommendations.

Contact Name and Telephone Number:

Charles Smith 392-5581.

20

1998 Operating Budgets - North York Performing Arts Centre

Corporation (NYPACC)

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee:

Recommendations:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the recommendations of the Board of Directors for the North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation embodied in the report (June 16, 1998) from the City Clerk.

The Budget Committee reports having requested the Chief Administrative Officer to provide a report:

(i)on the future of the North York Art Gallery, the Market Gallery and any other galleries operated by the former municipalities and on the possible consolidation of operations and/or galleries; and

(ii)on the number of visitors attending the North York Art Gallery who are theatre-goers and non-theatre goers, as well as the number of visitors attending the Market Gallery and any other gallery owned by one of the former municipalities.

Background:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, had before it a report (June 16, 1998) from the City Clerk, forwarding the recommendations of the Board of Directors for the North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation held on June 16, 1998 regarding the 1998 Operating Budgets.

The following persons appeared before the Budget Committee in connection with the foregoing matter:

-Mr. G. Garwood, Executive Manager, NYPACC; and

-Mr. K. Colley, Finance Department, North York Civic Centre.

--------

(Report dated June 16, 1998, addressed to the

Budget Committee from the Board of Directors for the

North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation)

The Board of Directors for the North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation on June 16, 1998, recommended as follows:

(1)that the 1998 Operating Budget for the North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation be approved;

(2)that the Operating Reserve be renamed as the Operating Stabilization Reserve; and

(3)that immediate spending approval be provided for artwork purchases up to $160,000.00. Given the current uncertainty on operations, spending approval for the remaining $90,000.00, is recommended for deferral pending a joint report from the Treasurer and the Executive Manager on the financial condition of the Corporation after September 30, 1998.

(The Board of Directors of the NYPACC would like to bring to the attention of the Members of the Budget Committee that the budget for the purchase of artwork is the funding level initially proposed for the purchase of artwork as previously adopted by the Board of Directors for NYPACC for the operation of the Art Gallery.

Background:

The Board of Directors for the North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation on June 16, 1998, had before it the following:

(a)Extract from the Minutes of the Meeting of the Finance and Operations Committee, North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation, held on April 23, 1998 regarding the 1998 Operating Budget for the North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation; and

(b)Report (April 21, 1998) from the Treasurer. North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation, forwarding the 1998 Operating Budget for the North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation for approval.

--------

(Extract from the Minutes of the Meeting of the

Finance and Operations Committee held on

April 23, 1998)

In considering this matter, the Committee had before it a Report (April 21, 1998) from the Treasurer.

It was moved by Mr. Wells, that this item be forwarded to the next meeting of the Board of Directors for approval.

Motion carried.

--------

(Report dated April 21, 1998, addressed to the

Chairman and Members, Finance and Operations Committee

North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation from the

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer)

The 1998 Budget is attached for the consideration and approval of the Board.

The Budget reflects a net revenue position of $199,00.00 of which $175,000.00 relates to donated artwork. The balance of $24,800.00 is the budgeted cash surplus for 1998 and may be required to offset against shortfalls in revenue projections or unanticipated expenditure requirements.

The absence of a strong programming commitment by Livent for the Apotex Theatre in 1998 introduces significant uncertainty with respect to revenues from ticket surcharges. As a result, these revenues are budgeted at historically low levels and impact the levels of expenditure that are budgeted. Revenues are reduced by $194,300.00 and expenditures are reduced by $133,400.00 from 1997 budgeted levels. The Budget continues to reflect the position of the Board that the Ford Centre be operated without public subsidy.

Significant items included in this Budget are as follows:

(1)revenue projections for ticket surcharges are based on estimates of the number of performances and tickets sold in both the Apotex Theatre and the George Weston Recital Hall. Terms of the 1996 Minutes of Settlement with Livent provided for an increase in the ticket surcharge amount to $1.60, effective July 1, 1997. The increase of ten cents per ticket is allocated only to the Art Gallery program. Revenue projections for the George Weston Recital Hall are based on historical averages for the number of performances and the estimated capacities. Estimates for ticket surcharge revenue from the Apotex Theatre are based on Livent's programming plans and represent significant reductions in both number of performances and capacities from historical patterns;

(2)the Management Agreement with Livent provides for an increase in base revenue to $1,500,000.00 per annum effective November 1, 1998. The budget reflects two months of increased revenue;

(3)the 1996 Minutes of Settlement between the Corporation and Livent provided for the relocation of the gift shop at a cost to the Corporation not to exceed $385,000.00. The gift shop was relocated and costs were fully funded in 1997 and as a result, no additional transfers to capital are required in 1998;

(4)funding for the purchase of artwork is established at $250,000.00. This is the funding level initially proposed for the purchase of artwork by the Robert Swain report previously adapted by the Board for the operation of the Art Gallery. This represents an increase of $167,300.00 over the 1997 budgeted level; and

(5)the Corporation is required to provide annual funding to a Capital Maintenance Reserve Fund. This fund was used in prior years to cover wall corrosion costs and was replenished upon settlement of our claim and recovery of most of the costs. Funding of the Capital Maintenance Reserve Fund is based on a Reserve Fund Study commissioned for the Corporation's use in January 1995. The 1998 allocation of $575,000.00 assumes interest of $60,000.00 will also be allocated during the year in order to meet the minimum funding level.

The Operating Reserve amounted to $1,545,000.00 at the end of 1997. No allocation was made to this reserve in 1997 and none is provided for in the 1998 budget. The purpose of this reserve was to cushion the Corporation from a significant contingent liability, which 1996 Minutes of Settlement suggest has been removed. It is appropriate to now consider this reserve similar to a stabilization reserve from which shortfalls in budgeted ticket surcharge levels could be funded. This would allow the Corporation to stabilize operations and levels of expenditure without absorbing the full impact of weak programming in the theatres in any given year. Similarly, in years of strong programming excesses in budgeted ticket surcharge levels would be used to fund this reserve.

Recommendations:

(1)approve the 1998 Operating Budget;

(2)rename the Operating Reserve as the Operating Stabilization Reserve; and

(3)provide immediate spending approval for artwork purchases up to $160,000.00. Given the current uncertainty on operations, spending approval for the remaining $90,000.00 is recommended for deferral pending a joint report from the Treasurer and Executive Manager on the financial condition of the Corporation after September 30, 1998.

(A copy of background information appended to the report dated April 21, 1998, from the Treasurer was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee for its meeting on June 30, 1998, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

21

1998 Capital Budget Request for Leaside Memorial Gardens

(Ward 1 - East York) (Former Borough of East York)

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee:

Recommendation:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the report (June 17, 1998) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and that the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto.

Background:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, had before it a report (June 17, 1998) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer regarding the approval of a loan in the amount of $60,000.00 to the Leaside Memorial Gardens.

--------

(Report dated June 17, 1998, addressed to the

Budget Committee from the

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer)

Purpose:

To report on a 1998 Capital Budget request in the amount of $60,000.00 for Leaside Memorial Gardens which was overlooked during the 1998 capital budget process. Details relating to the capital budget request are provided in Appendix A.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

The net 1998 Capital Budget as approved by Council will not be impacted by the approval of this project since it will be funded by a loan which will be repaid in the same manner as debentures.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that approval be given to a loan in the amount of $60,000.00, which relates to the Arena Lighting Upgrade project, to be repaid by Leaside Gardens in the same manner as if debentures had been issued, and that the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer be authorized to make the necessary arrangements to give effect thereto.

Background:

Leaside Memorial Community Gardens is partially funded by the former Borough of East York and is managed by an independent Board Of Management. The former Borough was used as a source of financing for Leaside Gardens capital projects. While the Borough funded projects directly, Leaside Gardens made regular loan payments through their operating budget, repaying the Borough's reserves at the going interest rates in the same manner as if debentures had been issued.

Leaside Gardens staff sent this capital budget request to the Borough within the time frame which had been established for 1998 capital budget submissions. The request was overlooked and consequently not included with the former Borough of East York's 1998 capital budget submission. Separate approval is therefore being requested for this 1998 capital budget program.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

As indicated in Appendix A, the arena's lighting system is below the minimum lighting standards for this type of facility. There is also a health and safety issue relating to the lack of plastic covers on the light fixtures.

East York Hydro has indicated that upgrading the lighting system could result in annual energy savings of approximately $1,900.00.

Conclusions:

Approval of the 1998 capital budget request is recommended.

Timely approval of the project is required to ensure completion by August 1998 to avoid impacting the projected 1999 revenues.

Contact Name:

Shekhar Prasad, 392-8095.

--------

Appendix A

1998 Capital Program Request

Leaside Memorial Gardens

Description:Arena Lighting Upgrade (electrical)

Project Costs:($)

Contract $4,000.00

Consulting 6,000.00

Total60,000.00

Sources of Funding:

Loan to be repaid over 10 years - under the same terms and conditions as debentures.

Project Description:

The arena lighting is very low compared to most recreation facilities with the same type programming. In the next couple of years there will be several of the 45 x 400 watt mercury vapour fixtures which will require new ballasts.

Also, there is the safety factor, the current light fixtures do not have plastic covers to protect the 400 watt bulbs. If a puck hit the bulb it could fall on the ice and injure skaters.

--------

(Communication dated April 6, 1998, addressed to

Mr. Glenn Kippen, Treasurer, Leaside Gardens from

Mr. Henry Stachelbeck, General Manager, Leaside Gardens)

On behalf of the Leaside Memorial Community Gardens Board of Management, I would like to provide the information for the Financial Review Committee for the new arena lighting system, as you requested today.

The arena lighting system is sub grade to all arenas this Board has compared it to. The acceptable minimum lighting standards for this type of facility is fifty-five foot candles per square foot. We currently possess an average of only twenty-three foot candles per square foot, way short of the minimal acceptable levels.

The current lighting system contains forty-five fixtures, composed of four hundred watt mercury vapour bulbs. East York Hydro staff informed the Board that Leaside could expect to see some savings in electrical energy switching to a new metal halide system. This savings will be determined by a consultant once a project has been approved.

I have attached to original letter requesting the amount of $60,000.00 for the capital improvements in the arena lighting. The Board is also aware that this cost will be debentured over the next ten years.

This project must be completed in August 1998 as to not effect any ice/floor revenue projected for this fiscal year.

I hope the above information will allow the Financial Review Committee to see the importance of the revamping of this forty-seven year old facility.

22

Business Travel Budget for Members of Council

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends that:

(1)for Members of Council who are not elected or appointed to the executive, board, section executive, task force or committee, the cap to attend the annual meeting of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), the International Union of Local Authorities (IULA), World Association of Major Metropolis (WAMM), Ontario Good Roads Association (OGRA), International Council for Local Environmental Issues (ICLEI) be limited to a total of $5,000.00 per Member on an annual basis, in recognition that international destinations may require the incurring of additional costs, subject to sufficient funds being available from the Council Business Travel Budget; and

(2)the Clerk be requested to survey Members of Council in the Fall of each year to ascertain their travel requirements for the following year, in order that the business travel estimates can be included in the operating budget submission of Council for consideration as part of the annual budget review process.

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following transmittal letter (June26, 1998) from the Budget Committee:

Recommendation:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, submits to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, without recommendation, the transmittal letter (June 22, 1998) from the Corporate Services Committee.

Background:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, had before it a transmittal letter (June 22, 1998) from the Corporate Services Committee regarding the Business Travel Budget for Members of Council.

--------

(Transmittal letter dated June 22, 1998, addressed to the

Budget Committee from the

Corporate Services Committee)

Recommendation:

The Corporate Services Committee on June 22, 1998, recommended to the Budget Committee, and Council, the adoption of Recommendations Nos. (1) and (2); and endorsed Recommendation No. (3) embodied in the joint report (June 18, 1998) from the Chief Administrative Officer, the Commissioner of Corporate Services, and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

Background:

The Corporate Services Committee on June 22, 1998, had before it a joint report (June 18, 1998) from the Chief Administrative Officer, the Commissioner of Corporate Services, and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, reporting as directed by City Council on June 3, 4 and 5, 1998, respecting Business Travel by Members of Council; advising that based on responses received from Members of Council regarding their intent to attend the annual meetings of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), the Federation of Canadian Municipalities ( FCM), the International Union of Local Authorities (IULA), World Association of Major Metropolis (WAMM), Ontario Good Roads Association (OGRA) and the International Council for Local Environmental Issues (ICLEI) this year, remaining funds in the Council Business Travel Budget are sufficient to cover the cost of such expenditures for 1998; that no additional funds are required from the Corporate Contingency Account at this time; and recommending that:

(1)for Members of Council who are not elected or appointed to the executive, board, section executive, task force or committee, the cap to attend the annual meeting of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), the International Union of Local Authorities (IULA), World Association of Major Metropolis (WAMM), Ontario Good Roads Association (OGRA), International Council for Local Environmental Issues (ICLEI) be limited to a total of $5,000.00 per Member on an annual basis, in recognition that international destinations may require the incurring of additional costs, subject to sufficient funds being available from the Council Business Travel Budget;

(2)the Clerk be requested to survey Members of Council in the Fall of each year to ascertain their travel requirements for the following year, in order that the business travel estimates can be included in the operating budget submission of Council for consideration as part of the annual budget review process; and

(3)the recommendations of the Corporate Services Committee and this report be submitted to the Budget Committee for consideration.

--------

(Joint Report dated June 18, 1998, addressed to the

Corporate Services Committee from the

Commissioner of Corporate Services, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

and the Chief Administrative Officer)

Purpose:

At its meeting held on June 3, 4 and 5, 1998, the Council of the City of Toronto gave consideration to Clause No. 13 of Report No. 7 of the Corporate Services Committee, entitled "Office Administration and Expenses of Members of Council." The Clause as amended by Council, recommended that funds for any interested Member of Council to attend the annual meeting of AMO, FCM, IULA, WAMM, OGRA and ICLEI be provided from the Council Business Travel Budget and that additional funds, if required, be allocated from the Corporate Contingency Account.

This report responds to a directive by Council that staff submit a report to the Corporate Services Committee on:

(1)the implications of this recommendation with respect to Members of Agencies, Boards and Commissions; and

(2)a cap on such expenditures; such report to also review the other policies of the former municipalities in regard thereto.

Source of Funds and Financial Implications:

Based on responses received from Members of Council regarding their intent to attend the annual meetings of AMO, FCM, IULA, WAMM, OGRA and ICLEI this year, remaining funds in the Council Business Travel Budget are sufficient to cover the cost of such expenditures for 1998. Accordingly, no additional funds are required from the Corporate Contingency Account at this time.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)for Members of Council who are not elected or appointed to the executive, board, section executive, task force or committee, the cap to attend the annual meeting of the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO), the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM), the International Union of Local Authorities (IULA), World Association of Major Metropolis (WAMM), Ontario Good Roads Association (OGRA), International Council for Local Environmental Issues (ICLEI) be limited to a total of $5,000.00 per Member on an annual basis, in recognition that international destinations may require the incurring of additional costs, subject to sufficient funds being available from the Council Business Travel Budget;

(2)the Clerk be requested to survey Members of Council in the Fall of each year to ascertain their travel requirements for the following year, in order that the business travel estimates can be included in the operating budget submission of Council for consideration as part of the annual budget review process; and

(3)the recommendations of the Corporate Services Committee and this report be submitted to the Budget Committee for consideration.

Council Reference/Background/History:

In considering Clause No. 13 of Report No. 7 of the Corporate Services Committee, entitled "Office Administration and Expenses of Members of Council," City Council recommended that funds for AMO, FCM, IULA, WAMM, OGRA and ICLEI be provided from the Council Business Travel Budget and that additional funds be allocated from the Corporate Contingency Account, if required.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

The following is a list of annual conferences for 1998:

AMOAugust 23 - 26, 1998Annual ConferenceToronto, Ontario

FCMJune 5 - 8, 1998Annual ConferenceRegina, Saskatchewan

IULAJune 8 - 10, 1998World ExecutiveHelsinki, Finland

WAMMApril 23 - 25, 1998Annual ConferenceSeoul, Korea

OGRAFebruary, 1998Annual ConferenceToronto, Ontario

ICLEIFebruary, 1998Annual ConferenceBursa, Turkey

All Councillors were polled to ascertain which of the upcoming annual conferences they intended to attend in 1998. Of the remaining conferences for 1998, six of the nineteen Councillors who responded, have expressed interest in attending the AMO conference. Based on this information, funds to cover such costs are available in the Council Business Travel Budget.

There have also been several requests to attend the 1999 annual meetings of WAMM, IULA, FCM and ICLEI. A more extensive survey of Members of Council will be conducted in the Fall, and funds to cover such costs will be submitted through the 1999 budget review process.

On June 3, 4 and 5, 1998, Council adopted, as amended, Clause No. 13 or Report No. 7 of the Corporate Services Committee entitled, "Office Administration and Expenses of Members of Council". Contained within this report was a recommendation that Members of Council seek

Council approval for Conference/Seminar events exceeding $3,500.00 (Canadian Funds). This policy remains in effect.

In recognition that international destinations may require the incurring of additional costs, it is recommended that the cap for Members of Council, who are not members of the Executive or Board of Directors, to attend the annual meetings of the aforementioned approved municipal organization be limited to $5,000.00 per Member on an annual basis, subject to sufficient funds being available from the Council Business Travel Budget.

Members of Council who wish to travel while acting in their capacity as a Chair or Vice-Chair of a City Agency, Board or Commission may do so, provided such funds are available in the operating budget of the particular Agency, Board or Commission, in conformance with the current policy.

Policies governing business travel in the former municipalities were as follows:

East York:

Since all requests for attendance were submitted to the East York Council, the limit or cap for each conference was set by Council, with funds provided from a miscellaneous account.

Etobicoke:

A cap of $2,500.00 was set for attendance at conferences. Expenditures were charged to a separate professional development account.

Metro:

Business travel expenses for Members directed to travel by Council, or incurred by Members of Council appointed to an executive, board or committee representing municipal interests were charged to a business travel account in the Council budget with no cap. Discretionary travel expenses were paid from the Members' individual office budgets, with an annual cap per Councillor of $2,800.00.

Discretionary travel was limited to $2,800.00 annually. The following, however, were exempt from the $2,800.00 limit:

(i)expenses incurred by Members of Council in attending the annual conference or annual section meeting of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, or the Association of Municipalities of Ontario;

(ii)expenses incurred by a Member of Council, where the Member of Council was a speaker, panel participant or paper presenter at an event, and where such participation was formally recognized in the agenda;

(iii)registration fees and related expenses for local conferences that did not require an overnight stay or per diem expense claim; and

(iv)expenses incurred by Members of Council who were elected or appointed to the Executive, Board, Section Executive, Task Force or Committee of an association representing municipal interests, where membership was paid by a department.

North York, Scarborough and York:

Council Members conference costs were charged directly to their own Discretionary Account. There was no cap or limit set.

Toronto:

Council Members appointed to an executive, board or Committees could attend annual conferences, with such costs charged to a general Council Operations Budget. Attendance at other conferences of specific interest to the Councillor were charged to the Councillor's own Office Expenditure Budget. No cap or limit was set.

Conclusions:

This report responds to the issues raised by Council and the Corporate Services Committee on business travel for Members of Council. The City Clerk has been consulted in the development of this report and supports its content and recommendations.

Contact Name:

Jim Hart, Director, Council Services and Management Services - 392-8676.

23

Financial Assistance for Public Art and Benches

- Kensington Market Area

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee:

Recommendation:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the approval of funds in the amount of $30,000.00 for the Kensington Market Area improvement project.

The Budget Committee reports having requested the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to report directly to Council on July 8, 1998 on the appropriate funding source for the $30,000.00 with preference being given to having same allocated from within the departmental budget.

Background:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, had before it a communication (June 1, 1998) from Ms. Barb Matthews, Community Development Coordinator, Kensington Market Action Committee, addressed to Councillor Olivia Chow regarding financial assistance for public art and benches.

--------

(Communication dated June 1, 1998, addressed to

Councillor Olivia Chow from Ms. Barb Matthews,

Community Development Coordinator, Kensington Market Action Committee)

I am writing on behalf of the Committee to seek your assistance in raising $40,000.00 for the purchase and installation of two important improvements, public art and benches.

Over the past year, our Committee has been working on the areas of improvement identified in the May 1997 Council-approved Action Plan. We fully appreciate the extensive and ongoing support you and your staff, namely Bruce Scott, have given us.

Public Art ($10,000.00) - following the rave reviews received on the two pieces of public art installed by the TTC with support by the City, City Works has gone ahead with the design of two more pieces. This art would be installed at the entrance and exit of Augusta Street (Dundas Street and College Street corners). However, the project requires a further $10,000.00 for completion.

Benches ($30,000.00) - For many years merchants and residents living and working in the market have expressed a need for public seating. Business owners welcome benches for their customers. Residents believe the seating invites tourists and others to sit awhile, take in the scenery and enjoy the Kensington experience. Members of the Streetscaping Task Force, in consultation with Committee members, residents and merchants have identified at least 30 feasible locations for benches. City Works has agreed to work cooperatively with the Committee around the purchase and installation of these benches; however, an investment of $30,000.00 is needed to make the purchase.

As you are aware from our fax to Joe Halstead seeking request for the relocation of planters, we are actively involved in other efforts to beautify the area.

We value your assistance in helping these two projects become a reality. These improvements will greatly enhance and improve conditions in the Market and encourage its promotion as a tourist and shopping destination.

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following report (July 6, 1998) from the Chief financial Officer and Treasurer:

Purpose:

To advise City Council on a source of funding for the provision of $30,000.00 to the Kensington Market Area improvement project.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

No additional funding will be required at this time.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that this report be received for information.

Council Reference/Background/History:

At its meeting of June 25, 1998, the Budget Committee considered and recommended approval of $30,000.00 in financial assistance towards the completion of a local community improvement project in Kensington Market. The Budget Committee requested the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to report directly to City Council on July 8, 1998 on an appropriate funding source for the $30,000.00 with preference being given to having the same allocated from within the departmental budget.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

Approved funding will be dedicated towards the purchase of benches which will be placed in various locations around the Market. Completion of this project will enhance and improve public seating in the Market and encourage its promotion as a tourist and shopping destination. Given the economic benefits which may accrue from this project, the funding request is deemed to fall under the purview of the Economic Development, Culture and Tourism Department. As the Department is being requested to make provision for this unallocated project from within its 1998 Operating Budget, the Finance Department will monitor the Department's expenditures to determine whether an offset may be required.

Conclusions:

Should City Council approve $30,000.00 for the Kensington Market Area improvement project, funding will be made available in the Economic Development, Culture and Tourism Department's 1998 Operating Budget.

Contact Name:

Marty Gurbin, tel: 397-4205.)

24

Proposal for the Development of The Yorkwoods Community

Centre Building into a Centre for Ethno-Cultural Development

and Learning

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, amended this Clause by adding thereto the following:

"It is further recommended that the North York Race Relations Committee be requested to submit a report to the Corporate Services Committee in September, 1998, on the results of their study.")

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations in the following transmittal letter (June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee:

Recommendations:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, that:

(1)the North York Committee on Community, Race and Ethnic Relations, in consultation with the Commissioner of Economic Development, Tourism and Culture, and other City Departments, undertake a six-month feasibility study of the Yorkwoods Gate Community Centre at a cost not to exceed $30,000.00;

(2)the funds be made available from the already approved 1998 budget allocation for the Yorkwoods Gate project; and

(3)prior to the release of the funds, the local Councillors consult with their communities in order to seek approval for this project.

Background:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, had before it a communication (June 25, 1998) from Dr. Peter Li Preti, Councillor, Black Creek, submitting a Proposal for the Development of The Yorkwoods Community Centre Building into a Centre for Ethno-Cultural Development and Learning.

Councillor Li Preti, Black Creek, appeared before the Budget Committee in connection with the foregoing matter, and filed a copy of his submission.

--------

(Communication dated June 25, 1998, addressed to the

Budget Committee from

Councillor Li Preti, Black Creek)

I would like to appear before the Budget Committee scheduled for Thursday, June 25, 1998, in reference to a very exciting project in the community I serve.

Attached, please find an executive summary of a proposal which I am sure you and the Committee Members would find interesting.

--------

(Executive Summary of the Proposal for the Development of the

Yorkwoods Community Centre Building into a

Centre for Ethno-Cultural Development and Learning)

Introduction:

Yorkwoods Community Centre will be declared surplus to the needs of the City of Toronto when the new recreation centre is finished by the late fall of 1998. The City must then decide what it will do with the building and land. This proposal would create a feasibility study on the conversion of the building into a community-based Centre for Ethno-Cultural Development and Learning with York University and other partners.

What is a Centre for Ethno-Cultural Development and Learning?:

The Faculty of Education of York University has been studying the possibility of developing a Centre for Ethno-Cultural Development and Learning since 1994. It is felt that an Education Centre at York University whose focus is on ethno-cultural issues would benefit the community, university, students and teachers. As well it could provide a resource for governments, business, schools and social agencies as they strive to understand and serve the reality of our intensely diverse Canadian society. Other York faculties, like Social Work, Political Science and Social Science could be involved as well.

The Yorkwoods Community Centre is ideally located for this institution. It is situated in the Jane/ Finch area, one of the world's most ethnically, linguistically and religiously diverse communities.

The centre would be involved in:

(a)training student teachers in this complicated environment;

(b)promoting professional development opportunities for university, social agencies and school staff;

(c)introducing the university as an educational choice to Jane/Finch area students;

(d)engaging business leaders in community, development projects and ethno-cultural awareness; and

(e)networking with individuals and organizations in the Jane/Finch community, the Greater Toronto area and from across Canada who are dealing with issues of ethno-cultural diversity and anti-racism.

Issues for the Feasibility Study:

The recreation centre has been a minor landmark on the street for three decades and has been part of the area's identity. If the building were to be demolished and a small park created, the inventory of community green space would be increased. This community can use all the green space possible. However there might also be concerns about street safety that could be compromised by the demolition.

Community feelings about the disposition of the building would be assessed through a process of public consultation.

The Yorkwoods Community Centre is not in good shape physically. The cost of repairing the roof, replacing the heating system, painting and interior renovations must be calculated and possible sources for this funding be found.

Negotiations between the University and the City must start over the disposition of building. Would it be rented, deed over or sold? Parking issues would have to be worked out, as would the nature of the future community use of the building and the land.

A Steering Committee would be struck that would include all partners: The City of Toronto, York University and its participating faculties, the Board of Education, local business representatives and Jane/Finch Community leaders. The Steering Committee would draft a mission statement and construct a working model for the governance and staffing of the Centre.

Research into capital, core and program funding sources for the centre from all levels of government, foundations, businesses and individuals would be done.

A report would be prepared and submitted to the City on the feasibility of locating the Centre for Ethno-Cultural Development and Learning in the Yorkwoods Community Centre by December15,1998.

Conclusion:

It is proposed that $30,000.00 be transferred from the funds that the City has allocated for the demolition of the Yorkwoods Community Centre to the North York Committee on Community, Race and Ethnic Relations' budget for the purpose of conducting this six month feasibility study.

____________________

1Adapted from the York University report. Proposal for the Development of a Centre for Ethno-Cultural Development and Learning at the Faculty of Education, York University.

(A copy of background information was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee for its meeting on June 30, 1998, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following communications:

(i)(July 2, 1998) from Ms. W. MacNevin, on behalf of the Network of Community Based Organizations, regarding the proposed demolition of the Yorkwoods Community Centre and redevelopment of the site as an ethno-cultural centre; recommending that funding for the consultation process in this regard not be utilized from the existing funds allocated for the redevelopment; and requesting that Council refer the matter back to the appropriate Committee for further consideration;

(ii)(July 3, 1998) from Mr. S. M. Shapson, Phd, Dean of Education, York University, addressed to Councillor Peter Li Preti, enclosing a copy of an earlier communication (June 23, 1998) regarding the redevelopment of the Yorkwoods Community Centre site as an ethno-cultural centre and seeking to clarify the University's position in this regard; and

(iii)(July 6, 1998) from the Superintendent, Community, Administrative and Student Services, Toronto District School Board, submitting comments on the redevelopment of the Yorkwoods Community Centre as an ethno-cultural centre and advising that the School Board is willing to supply information and co-operate fully in any feasibility study which may be undertaken.)

25

Allocation of Parks Levy Funds to Ed McLeverty Equal

Access Playground (Ward 26 - East Toronto)

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendation in the following transmittal letter (June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee:

Recommendation:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the report (June 19, 1998) from the Director of Development and Support, Parks and Recreation, Toronto City Hall, subject to the monies being received by the developer and construction of the playground proceeding this summer.

Background:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, had before it a report (June 19, 1998) from the Director of Development and Support, Parks and Recreation, Toronto City Hall, regarding the allocation of parks levy funds to Ed McLeverty Equal Access Playground.

--------

(Report dated June 19, 1998 addressed to

the Budget Committee from the

Director of Development and Support, Parks and Recreation,

Toronto, City Hall Office)

Source of Funds:

Parks Levy payments to be submitted by Loblaw Development Properties for the development at 612 Victoria Park Avenue.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)City Council authorize the allocation of park levy funds in the amount of $55,000.00 to be paid in advance by Loblaw Development Properties for the development at 612 Victoria Park Avenue to Account 216409 40300 C1401 for the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture & Tourism to implement Phase 2 of the project to construct the Ed McLeverty Equal Access Playground; and

(2)the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the actions necessary to implement the foregoing.

Comments:

The 1998 Parks and Recreation Capital Budget included $100,000.00 in funds in 1998 for construction of Phase I of the Ed McLeverty Equal Access Playground and projected $55,000.00 in 1999 for Phase II. Phase II is contingent upon payment of the $55,000.00 in parks levy funds to be generated by the Loblaws store to be built at 612 Victoria Park Avenue. The Ed McLeverty Playground will be a unique facility for the disabled community. The Civitan Club has raised over $40,000.00 and donated it to the City for this project.

At its meeting of August 21, 1997, City Council adopted, as amended, Clause 42 of Executive Committee Report No. 19 respecting the Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application for 612 Victoria Park Avenue, including a recommendation that "the $55,000.00 parks levy from this site be applied to the East of Main parklands construction/reconstruction." The Ed McLeverty Equal Access Playground is to be established on a portion of the East Toronto Athletic Field, a park abutting the west edge of the proposed East of Main project.

Loblaw Development Properties has offered to submit the parks levy payment of $55,000.00 in advance of their application for a building permit. In light of Council's actions respecting the allocation of parks levy funds submitted in 1998, Council authority is necessary to allocate these funds submitted in 1998 to this project.

Contact Name:

Susan Richardson, Director, Development and Support, Tel: 392-1941, Fax: 392-0845, e-mail: srichard@city.toronto.on.ca.

26

Final Approvals - Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project

(Downtown)

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, amended this Clause by adding thereto the following:

"It is further recommended that:

(a)the joint report dated July7,1998, from the Chief Administrative Officer, the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, entitled 'Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project - Report Requested from Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee (Downtown)', embodying the following recommendations, be adopted:

'It is recommended that:

(1)Recommendation No. (4)(c)of the June 29, 1998 report of the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services respecting Final Approvals: Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project be replaced with the following recommendation:

"The cash flow projection shown in Table 1 contained in the July 7, 1998 report be adopted and approved as the annualized budget of the project for the next 5 years."; and

(2) (a)acquisition of 299 Yonge Street be approved under terms and conditions outlined in this report; and

(b)the City Solicitor be authorized to complete the transaction and pay to the owner of 299 Yonge Street, Colekin Investments Limited, or to whomever may be found entitled to receive it, the amount of $2,425,000.00 plus adjustments as outlined in this report, and pay any expenses incurred incidental to the closing of the real property transaction, including the payment of the Land Transfer Tax, estimated to be in the amount of $37,200.00 from Account No.216692.'; and

(b)the following motion be referred to the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services for report thereon to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee after the recommendations embodied in the report dated June 29, 1998, from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services, and related material are implemented:

Moved by Councillor Shiner:

'It is further recommended that the agreement between the City of Toronto and Pen Equity Management Corporation include a condition guaranteeing that any cost for acquiring the land for all parcels exceeding the projected net cost to the City of $14.4million be paid for by Pen Equity or any developer that takes over that site.' ")

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends that:

(1)the report (June 29, 1998) from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services be adopted;

(2)approval of final financial settlements with landowners be granted by the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and Council; and

(3)the report (June 29, 1998) from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development regarding financial matters, which was forwarded to Members of Council under confidential cover, be received.

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having requested that the following reports be submitted directly to City Council on July 8, 1998:

(a)the City Auditor to review the financial statements and business plans for the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project and report on the financial risks to the City;

(b)the Chief Administrative Officer to report on a critical path and a process to raise funds for this project under the Section 37 Agreements and/or the use of benefitting levies; and

(c)the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services to report on all the figures related to costs and benefits to the City during the next 10 years.

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following report (June 29, 1998) from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services:

Purpose:

To report on the decision of the Joint Board (Ontario Municipal Board and Board of Inquiry) respecting the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project and to seek the endorsement of Council to proceed with the project including the funding and the expropriation of certain lands.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

Gross Costs: Previously estimated at $53 million; unchanged

Net Costs: Previously estimated at $14.4 million; unchanged

Funding Source: Former City of Toronto By-law 1997-0197 provides authority for short term borrowing from reserve pool of up to $53 million, subject to certain limitations; Former City of Toronto Council May 1997 approved permanent financing of $14.4 million and directed that the source of funds be reserves, reserve funds, debentures, or a combination of the above and that the exact source of financing be determined as the project nears to completion.

Funds to cover the expenditures identified in this report are to be charged to Capital Account #216692

Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

Project objective has been to minimize financial risk and maintain reasonable costs. Expenditure in keeping with achieving a major strategic public investment at a key location and will be offset over time with direct and indirect tax benefits and other direct financial benefits to the City which are associated with the revitalization of this area of the downtown core.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the commitment to proceed with the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project be endorsed;

(2)the Project funding provisions contained in the former City of Toronto By-law 1997-0197 including the gross expenditure of $53 million, be endorsed;

(3)the former City of Toronto's approval of permanent financing of $14.4 million for this Project and the source of funds, being reserve funds, debentures, or a combination of the above, be confirmed and the exact source of financing be determined and reported by the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee including consideration of ways and means which may be employed to reduce the net cost of the Project;

(4)(a)the funding amounts and sources for implementation costs previously identified for the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project including funding for the design and development of the public square, to be allocated in the 1999 Urban Planning and Development Services Capital Account #216692 and funding for incidental and property management costs, be identified by the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in consultation with the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services and reported to the appropriate committee for authorization for the allocation of these funds;.

(b)the budget for the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project Capital Account #216692 be increased by $36,300,000.00 for 1998;

(c)the cash flow projection shown in Table 2 contained in this report be adopted and approved as the annualized budget of the project for the next three years;

(5)the execution of an amending agreement between the City of Toronto and PenEquity Management Corporation, as outlined in this report, be authorized;

(6)the execution of an agreement between the City of Toronto and Ryerson Polytechnic University based on the Memorandum of Agreement previously authorized by the former City of Toronto as amended by the provisions outlined in this report, be authorized;

(7)the expropriation of the following properties municipally known as 285 Yonge Street, 289 Yonge Street, 299 Yonge Street, 1 Dundas Street East, 311 Yonge Street, 313 Yonge Street, 317 Yonge Street, 319 Yonge Street, 323 Yonge Street, 327 Yonge Street, 38 Dundas Street East and 259 Victoria Street all as shown on Map 2 attached to this report be approved and the following be directed:

(a)the filing of a Plan of Expropriation on or before July 15, 1998 be undertaken provided the following agreements are executed in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor in consultation with appropriate City officials:

(i)an agreement between the City of Toronto and PenEquity Management Corporation;

(ii)an agreement between the City of Toronto and Ryerson Polytechnic University; and

(iii)a lease between PenEquity Management Corporation and AMC Theatres of Canada, Inc.;

(b)the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer or designate and the City Clerk or designate be authorized and directed to execute a Certificate of Approval in the form prescribed in the Expropriations Act;

(c)authority be granted to the Commissioner of Corporate Services to sign the Notices of Expropriation and Notices of Possession on behalf of the City;

(d)offers of compensation, in compliance with the requirements of the Expropriations Act, to the registered owners, and/or whomever may be entitled to be served, be approved up to the amount of the appraisal reports obtained by the Commissioner of Corporate Services, and that the appropriate City officials be authorized to make payment in accordance with accepted offers of compensation and to otherwise settle the compensation claims within the limits of their authority and further be authorized to complete these transactions; prepare the necessary documents releasing the City from any claims arising from the expropriation of land; pay any interest charges or expenses incurred by the City; and pay any reasonable legal and appraisal fees associated therewith;

(e)the lands be placed under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Corporate Services until required for purposes as outlined in this report;

(f)the appropriate City officials be authorized to take such action as may be necessary to complete these transactions and/or take possession of the land involved including the preparation and registration of the Expropriation Plan and service of the required documents such as Notice of Expropriation, Notice of Possession, Notice of Election, Without Prejudice Offers, Appraisal Reports, etc.; and

(g)notwithstanding the expropriation, negotiations already underway with Optical Properties (38 Dundas Street East) and the Salvation Army (259 Victoria Street) continue with a view to potentially resolving their particular issues;

(8)continued participation in a collaboration with the Yonge Street Business and Resident Association Inc. in undertaking the Downtown Yonge Street Regeneration Program be approved on the following basis:

(a)a grant of up to $81,000.00, conditional on matching funds being raised by the Yonge Street Business and Resident Association Inc., be approved from Capital Account#216692 for 1998;

(b)the grant be deemed to be in the interest of the municipality;

(c)a Grant Agreement be entered into with the Yonge Street Business and Resident Association Inc. to contain such terms and conditions as set out in the existing Grant Agreement with said Association and other such terms and conditions as deemed necessary by the City Solicitor and the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services;

(d)the Program continue to be administered by the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services and the existing Steering Committee continue to oversee the program and the account; and

(e)the release of any funds be subject to the satisfactory completion of a Declaration Form regarding the adoption of the City of Toronto's non-discrimination policy;

(9)the filing of a Site Plan Approval application by PenEquity Management Corporation for Parcel A lands acquired by the City through expropriation be authorized and the Commissioner of Corporate Services be instructed to provide an authorization for such application at the appropriate time;

(10)the potential variances to the Project generally described in this report be endorsed in principle and the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services be directed to provide all reasonable efforts to assist PenEquity Management Corporation in achieving approvals for the variances, if required, through the Committee of Adjustment, including appearance at the Ontario Municipal Board, if necessary;

(11)the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services and the Commissioner of Corporate Services be instructed to draft a "Nathan Phillips Square"-type Municipal Code Amendment to establish regulations for the use and programming of the public square on Parcel D and it be forwarded for consideration to City Council, through the appropriate Committee;

(12)the appropriate City officials be directed to take whatever steps are necessary to undertake the implementation of the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project as outlined in this report;

(13)the City Clerk be directed to notify the Ontario Municipal Board of City Council's decisions respecting this matter immediately following the Council meeting of July 8, 9 and 10, 1998;

(14)leave be granted for the introduction of the necessary Bills in Council to give effect thereto; and

(15)the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to the steps necessary to give effect to the foregoing.

Background:

The Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project is the key piece of the Downtown Yonge Street Regeneration Program, a public-private initiative aimed at revitalizing Yonge Street between College and Queen Streets. This initiative had its origins in 1994 (chronology attached) with a request from the former City of Toronto Council to develop a plan for the improvement of Yonge and Dundas and from concerns raised by the business and resident community about Yonge Street's diminished role as the City's traditional main shopping street and the street's generally deteriorating character, appearance and level of public safety.

The Yonge Street Business and Resident Association initiated the Downtown Yonge Street Regeneration Program in 1996 with a specific work program which included facilitating a redevelopment project to create new retail and entertainment space on Yonge Street and an improved shopping environment. The Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project was conceived of and planned during 1996/97 and the former City of Toronto Council approved the project, its funding and related planning regulations in May, 1997.

Project Description:

The Project involves the assembly of land on the east side of Yonge Street north and south of Dundas Street to create four parcels (see maps 1 and 2 attached).

(a) Parcel A includes the first six properties north of Dundas Street up to but not including the existing HMV store, and the air rights over the Ryerson parking garage. Through a Request for Qualifications process and industry consultations which were held in late 1996 and early 1997, the former City of Toronto selected a private developer to purchase and develop this parcel. An agreement to sell the land was subsequently entered into with PenEquity Management Corporation. Together with the use of the air rights over the Ryerson parking garage, the Yonge frontage lands are to be developed by PenEquity for "Metropolis", an "urban entertainment centre" containing 385,000 square feet for street-related retail, restaurant and entertainment space in "vertical retailing" formats and a cinema "megaplex" with up to 30 screens operated by AMC Theatres of Canada;

(b) Parcel B has longer term redevelopment potential for hotel and residential uses with possible interim use for retail space. The parcel contains the City-owned building at 277 Victoria Street and 38 Dundas Street East, a small triangular property containing a retail building. The former City of Toronto Council authorized staff to negotiate an agreement with the owners of 38 Dundas Street East in order to maintain a development option for Parcel B that would include both properties;

(c) Parcel C is 259 Victoria Street which is owned by the Salvation Army. The former City of Toronto, through the Request for Proposals process, selected Senator Restaurants Limited to negotiate the purchase of the property to complete a retail edge around the square on Parcel D. City officials are currently negotiating arrangements with Senator Restaurants and the Salvation Army to complete this transaction; and

(d) Parcel D includes four properties fronting on Yonge Street between Dundas Square and Dundas Street, the City lane and the lot operated by the Parking Authority at 25 Dundas Street East. The proposed use is a public square with approximately 250-space below grade parking facility operated by the Parking Authority. The square would be developed following a competitive design process and would be subject to a Municipal Code Amendment similar to that which governs the use of Nathan Phillips Square.

Previous Approvals Secured:

Subsequent to the former City of Toronto Council's approvals, the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing issued his notice of decision to approve the various planning regulations on June 19, 1997. The Financial Advisory Board reviewed the proposal and approved it on July 15, 1997.

The associated land expropriation process commenced in September 1997 after receiving certain approvals required from the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing. Notwithstanding the initiation of the expropriation process, the City made two series of offers to landowners in the area and has maintained an "open door" with respect to achieving negotiated land acquisitions.

Both the planning and the expropriation related-matters were appealed by certain landowners in the summer and fall of 1997. The Ontario Municipal Board, sitting as a Joint Board under the Consolidated Hearings Act, held a hearing on these matters between February and May 1998 and rendered its decision on June 5, 1998, approving the project as proposed by the former City of Toronto and the Yonge Street Business and Resident Association.

Decision of the Joint Board (Ontario Municipal Board):

The Board dismissed all appeals and approved Official Plan, Community Improvement Plan and Zoning By-law amendments as approved by the former City of Toronto Council in May 1997 and as modified in October 1997. The Board withheld its order pending fulfilment of conditions which are outlined below.

The Board, acting in its role as Inquiry Officers under the Expropriations Act, also found that "the taking of the land is fair, sound and reasonably necessary in the achievement of the objectives" of the City and by this decision reports to City Council, the approval authority, that "the application for approval has merit and should proceed".

The Board's decision, as amended by their order of June 22, 1998, is conditional on the following:

(a)that City Council "endorse the commitment to proceed with the project" and "commit the necessary funding and confirm its intent to proceed with the expropriation". The commitment must be made by July 10, 1998 and plans of expropriation must be filed by July15, 1998;

(b)finalizing and confirming the PenEquity/AMC lease and the PenEquity/City Agreement by July 15th ; and

(c)fulfilling certain planning conditions by August 30th including:

(i)the Section 37 Agreement required by the Official Plan and Zoning By-law;

(ii)Site Plan Approval of Parcel A (Metropolis by PenEquity) including certain specific issues relating to the TTC and the design and function of sidewalk areas; and

(iii)for the Public Square, a municipal code amendment to regulate use and an approved design process.

Other important matters which the Board did not include in its conditions which should be addressed contemporaneously include:

(i)the Ryerson Agreement with the City which will be assigned to PenEquity Management Corporation;

(ii)applications to stop up and close affected lanes and portions of streets; and

(iii)Parcel B and C negotiations.

Overview of Project Benefits:

While the project has always been estimated to involve a net cost to the City, as a "city building" or community improvement project, it is with some considerable benefit that this investment in infrastructure is being made. The social and economic well-being of the City was clearly recognized by the Ontario Municipal Board as the principle motivation for this undertaking, recognizing that "infrastructure" in the late 1990's means supporting tourism and economic development by regenerating this area of the traditional downtown core, especially on the east side of Yonge Street.

The benefits of this undertaking include:

(a)one-acre public square in an area recognized as deficient in open space by the Official Plan;

(b)250-space below-grade parking garage;

(c)high quality retail and entertainment space within the redevelopment project and spin-off redevelopment in the Yonge and Dundas vicinity;

(d)Ryerson Polytechnic University: use of 12 cinemas (up to 2800 seats) for lecture hall purposes during the morning; guaranteed parking revenues; physical improvements to the Victoria Street streetscape; an "address" on the new square for this important downtown institution;

(e)projected direct tax revenue (present value) and levies of $15.1 million and spin-off tax revenue (present value) of $24.9 million;

(f)projected direct increase in employment of between 700 and 1300 jobs not including construction jobs or jobs from spin-off redevelopment;

(g)improving and maximizing use of infrastructure for the important and growing tourism sector of the economy; and

(h)providing economic and social stability for a neglected part of the traditional downtown core; addressing social issues including crime and safety especially related to the drug trade.

Development Strategy:

Pursuant to the Community Improvement powers of the Planning Act and the former City of Toronto's Official Plan community improvement policies, the development strategy for this project has involved the following:

(a)acquisition and sale of land at a strategic location for retail and entertainment uses;

(b)acquisition of land for a public square with below grade parking to be operated by the City;

(c)on-going feasibility testing involving outside expert consultants;

(d)on-going risk minimization through:

(i)maintaining an open offer to negotiate land acquisition with land owners to provide greater certainty;

(ii)keeping up with current information on potential land acquisition and business disturbance costs;

(iii)building cushions into the City/PenEquity agreement in the event of land cost increases; and

(iv)providing for mechanisms which will over time permit the recovery of the City's net costs eg. Section 37 payments from redevelopment in the vicinity.

Expropriation Process:

It is recommended that City Council, as the Approval Authority under the Expropriations Act, approve the application as requested, accepting the report of the Ontario Municipal Board, as Inquiry Officers, that the taking of the lands is fair, sound and reasonably necessary in the achievement of the objectives of the City for the reasons identified herein.

The expropriation involves 10 properties fronting on Yonge Street, from 285 to 327 Yonge Street and two properties to the east along Dundas Street at Victoria Street - 38 Dundas Street East and 259 Victoria Street (also known as 37 Dundas Street East). It is considered appropriate in the context of this project and the nature of the properties being expropriated that possession of these properties not be required until January 15, 1999, after the 1998 holiday season.

The former City of Toronto Council authorized negotiations with the owners of the Dundas Street East properties - Optical Properties and the Salvation Army respectively - with a view to achieving the project goals in a timely and appropriate manner. With respect to Optical Properties, discussions have been held respecting their potential involvement in a development option on the property. With respect to the Salvation Army, discussions have been held respecting their potential relocation in the vicinity. In order to comply with the conditions set down by the Board, the expropriation of these properties should proceed with the proviso that negotiations already underway with these owners continue with a view to potentially resolving their particular issues.

Project Funding:

The former City of Toronto Council passed By-law 1997-0197 providing authority for short term financing up to $53 million to be provided from the City's working capital and other reserves (General Fund). Permanent financing of $14.4 million for the Project was approved by the former City of Toronto and it was directed that the source of funds be reserves, reserve funds, debentures or a combination of the above and that the exact source of financing be determined as the Project nears completion.

It is recommended that City Council endorse the Project funding provisions contained in the former City of Toronto By-law 1997-0197 and that City Council confirm the former City of Toronto's approval of permanent financing of $14.4 million for this project and confirm that the source of funds be reserve funds, debentures, or a combination of the above with the exact source of financing to be determined by the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

(a)Funding Authorities:

On December 9, 1996, the former City of Toronto Council approved a Stage Two Feasibility and Approvals Process budget of $750,000.00 for the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project. Subsequently, on May 6, 1997, the former City of Toronto Council directed that short term interim financing up to $53.0 million be provided from the former City's working capital and other reserves (General Fund) and approved permanent financing of $14.4 million for the project under the authority of By-law 1997-0197 and directed that the source of funds be reserves, reserve funds, debentures, or a combination of the above and that the exact source of financing be determined as the project neared completion.

It should be noted that on July 15, 1997, the Financial Advisory Board approved the short term financing plan subject to the following conditions: that the total cost of the project not exceed $56.7 million and the net cost to the former City of Toronto not exceed $14.4 million.

(b)Current Status and Projections:

Table 1, below, shows the fund status, as of receipt of OMB approval of the Project:

Table 1

YONGE DUNDAS

REDEVELOPMENT

216692

AUTHORIZATION

750,000.00

EXPENSE SUMMARY
Staffing

89,987.00

Materials & Supplies

7,762.00

Consultants

1,215,578.00

Non Professional Services

22,736.00

City Business

8,483.00

Advertising

20,622.00

Misc. Services

3,474.00

G.S.T.

84,608.00

O.M.B. Settlements

13,750.00

Contributions to YSBRA

113,350.00

1,580,350.00

G.S.T. Rebate

(47,048.00)

YSBRA Recovery

(37.00)

Donations to YSBRA

(2,500.00)

EXPENSE TOTAL

1,530,765.00

DEFICIT

780,765.00

While Table 1 shows a "deficit", expenditures have not exceeded the former City of Toronto Council May 1997 total Project funding authority which was intended to cover all soft costs from the commencement of the Project.

Stage Two funding in the amount of 750,000. was provided to finance conditional acquisition agreements for land acquisitions, continue existing consultants working on the Project, and retain additional consultants. In July 1997, the Board of Management authorized $772,163.00 in specific consultant studies, and in November 1997, Board of Management authorized an additional $493,174.00 in O.M.B. specific consultant studies. The 1997 funding grant for the Yonge Street Business and Resident Association Inc., and donations to same, have been processed through this fund. It is anticipated that the Association will receive funding in the amount of $81,000.00 through this account in 1998 (discussed further below). The balance of expenses and commitments incurred are of an administrative nature (salaries, advertising, presentation materials, etc.) dealing with land acquisition and hearings.

The initial allocation of $750,000.00 has not been increased pending the O.M.B. decision brought down on June 5, 1998. An additional allocation of $1.3 million will be required to offset existing administrative expenditures of $781,000.00 and commitments of $519,000.00 to year end (discussed further below).

The plans of expropriation are scheduled to be registered on or before July 15, 1998. Within three months, ie. by October 15, 1998, Offers of Compensation will be presented to all property owners. The property owners can accept the offers of compensation, presenting the City with an accrued liability estimated at $35 million. Even though this is a worst case scenario, we must be prepared to meet this obligation.

Taking into account the recommended amendment to the PenEquity Agreement outlined in this report, the total consideration to the City is potentially up to $37 million paid as follows: Upon closing of Parcel A on January 15, 1999, PenEquity Management Corporation will provide the City with $21.5 million. An additional $4 million payment for participation entitlement (if the City or PenEquity Management Corporation so elects) will be made 210 days after the January 15, 1999 closing. 60 days after substantial completion of PenEquity's development on Parcel A, which is estimated to be Fall, 2000, PenEquity Management Corporation will pay the City an additional $8.5 million. Should land purchase costs exceed the allocation provided by the City, PenEquity will reimburse the City up to $3.0 million.

Cash flow projections for the project are as follows:

Table 2

Year

Gross

Net

1997

750,000

750,000

1998

36,300,000

36,300,000

1999

8,000,000

(21,500,000)

2000

7,950,000

(1,150,000)

53,000,000

14,400,000

While the Project is expected to generate direct and indirect tax benefits to the City which offset the net cost and provide a net benefit, it is also recommended that the consideration being given to various ways and means which may be employed to reduce the net cost of the project to the City in the short term be examined in more detail and reported to City Council for further direction. These ways and means include the use of Section 37 funds from redevelopment in the vicinity, the sale of city-owned property in the vicinity, the use of a benefiting levy and potential various commercial benefits associated with the public square.

There are additional costs which were previously reported to the former City of Toronto Council with respect to the implementation of the project, generally relating to the design and the development of the public square. It is recommended that the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer in consultation with the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services identify funding amounts and sources for implementation costs previously identified for the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project including funding for the design and development of the public square to be allocated in the 1999 Urban Planning and Development Services Capital Budget and funding for incidental and property management costs and report to the appropriate committee of Council for authorization to allocate these funds.

(c) Related Funding Issues:

The following matters are addressed in the discussion above.

(i)Ontario Municipal Board Hearing Expenses:

The City continued to utilize the services of Borden and Elliot and KPMG Management Consulting throughout the OMB hearing process, as authorized by City Council on October6 and 7, 1997. The hearing was a substantial undertaking involving hundreds of hours of preparation and hearing time. Additional consultant services which were required during the course of the hearing were largely paid for from existing funding allocations.

(ii)Yonge Street Business and Resident Association (YSBRA) Grant:

In 1996 and 1997, the former City of Toronto Council granted YSBRA funds to undertake the Downtown Yonge Street Regeneration Program, a collaborative initiative which concentrates on improving the environment and perceptions of Yonge Street, promoting and marketing the street and working with the City to identify redevelopment opportunities including the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project.

Private sector participation in this program has been substantial and is pursued on an on-going basis. The YSBRA is working toward re-establishing a Business Improvement Area on the street which may provide the necessary long-term vehicle for self-sufficiency, maintenance and management of the area. Support has been solicited from a cross-section of land owners in the area and the BIA notice procedure will potentially be undertaken this fall. As the street renews itself, it is important, however, for the City to support the community's efforts. In this regard, the Ontario Municipal Board found that:

"it is essential that YSBRA continue its efforts to ensure that the principles expressed in the CIP (Community Improvement Plan) are fully realized. In this regard, the Board encourages its active participation in the maintaining of the area as a safe and clean environment which attracts tourists and visitors and citizens of Toronto to Yonge and Dundas as has been accomplished by the BID (Business Improvement District) in Times Square."

In its discussions with the former City of Toronto concerning its 1997 budget, YSBRA proposed a $162,000.00 budget for 1998 consisting of $81,000.00 grant from the City matched by $81,000.00 raised by YSBRA. In a letter dated February 24, 1998, (attached), the then Chairman, Eamon Kelly, (since replaced by Interim Chairman Arron Barberian) advised the YSBRA share of the 1998 budget was close to being attained through fundraising and they formally requested a matching grant from the City for $81,000.00.

It is recommended that the existing Grant Agreement between the City and YSBRA be extended to 1998 to provide for a $81,000.00 grant with appropriate terms and conditions as may be appropriate and deemed necessary by the City Solicitor and the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services.

Business Issues:

In respect of the City of Toronto / PenEquity Agreement and the City of Toronto / Ryerson Agreement, certain amendments are recommended as follows:

(a)The former City of Toronto entered into an agreement with PenEquity Management Corporation on September 10, 1997. Supplementary agreements have been entered into to extend the agreement to facilitate the approvals process and to allow PenEquity to assign the agreement to an associated company. An amendment is recommended to the agreement to allow additional funding for the City in the event of increases in land costs.

The amendment also contemplates that PenEquity may apply for variances to the project as currently configured in the draft Site Plan Approval generally as follows: 3700 square metres of additional gross floor area within the proposed building envelope and an increase in height of approximately 10 metres to the signature tower at Yonge and Dundas to permit additional signage opportunities. These potential design modifications have been reviewed and can be endorsed in principle.

(b)The former City of Toronto entered into a Memorandum of Terms with Ryerson Polytechnic University on November 3, 1997. The memorandum is being transformed into an agreement, the intention of which is to serve as a contract between PenEquity Management Corporation and Ryerson once the agreement is assigned from the City upon taking title to the lands.

The agreement covers issues which arise from developing above the Ryerson parking garage including the transfer of the air rights, the guarantee of parking revenues, the operation of the garage, possible disruption to the operation of the Ryerson bookstore and the Tim Hortons, payments to Ryerson, use of the theatres for lecture hall space, the design of the development as it affects Ryerson and various miscellaneous matters.

These terms have not changed since the approval of the former City of Toronto Council with the following exception. Ryerson has requested that the City stand behind PenEquity's guarantee of the revenue from the Ryerson parking garage. The City's guarantee would be for approximately $1.5 million during the construction period of the project and for $750,000.00 from substantial completion until there was a 2 year period of no claims on the guarantee. In consideration of the City's role in brokering an arrangement between PenEquity and Ryerson which will be of some considerable benefit, it is appropriate in this limited circumstance that the City stand beside Ryerson to ensure that it maintains its revenue position.

Planning Issues:

(a)Work Program:

The following outlines key elements of the work program for the next several months essentially related to the development of Parcel A. There are other matters related to the development of Parcel D - the public square and Parking Authority facility - and Parcels B and C which will be pursued, but which are not subject to the time constraints of the OMB decision:

(i)preparation of Section 37 and development agreements;

(ii)Site Plan Approval - Parcel A;

(iii)Public Art Plan;

(iv)applications to stop up and close: portions of Victoria and Gould Street immediately abutting 17 Gould Street and O'Keefe Lane north and south of Dundas Street;

(v)related matters pertaining to removal of trees and existing public art;;

(vi)Municipal Code Amendment application respecting signage on Parcel A; and

(vii)related matters pertaining to the TTC, utilities and other required approvals

(b)Site Plan Approval:

PenEquity Management Corporation filed a "draft Site Plan Approval" application in October 1997 and the City issued a "draft Statement of Approval" on March 2, 1998. The process facilitated a review of the site plan prior to land acquisition, given that the question of expropriation was being considered by the Ontario Municipal Board. The draft approval did identify a number of outstanding matters which require resolution. In addition, a formal site plan approval application will be required from PenEquity, with the agreement of the City and Ryerson, once the City takes title to the land but before the land and the Ryerson air rights are conveyed to PenEquity. It is recommended that authority for the Commissioner of Corporate Services to authorize a Site Plan Approval application immediately upon the City obtaining title to the lands be granted.

Several site plan issues were discussed during the OMB hearing which, based on the Board's findings, will have to addressed in the Site Plan Approval.

The Board found that the appellants' architect's evidence with respect to improvements to the draft site plan "should be seriously considered and incorporated, if feasible". These matters include:

(a)strengthening the connection to the subway from the building and between the cinema and the parking garage;

(b)potential for congestion along Dundas Street respecting vehicular pick-up and drop-off activity;

(c)pedestrian entrance and exiting conflicts along Dundas Street;

(d)pedestrian and vehicular conflicts along Victoria Street in the vicinity of the parking garage entrance;

(e)desire to keep the plans flexible to accommodate different uses; and

(f)further design work on the Victoria Street elevations.

Partially in response to these issues, and in keeping with issues already identified by the City which were in need of resolution, the City offered the following conditions relating to the Site Plan Approval:

(a)TTC related matters respecting access, linkage and improvements to the Dundas Station;

(b)detailed design program of the Victoria Street sidewalk including the consideration of sidewalk widening, weather protection, lighting and amenities;

(c)detailed design of the facade including provision for Public Art;

(d)with respect to the cinema facility, a detailed pick-up/drop-off plan and entrance and exiting plan; and

(e)with respect to Dundas Street, a detailed design program for the pedestrian area.

The Board specifically found that the street entrance to the subway on the northeast corner of Dundas and Yonge should be relocated to an internal access to the project as recommended by the architect for PenEquity.

It is noted that should PenEquity seek modifications to the Site Plan Approval, it will be processed as a site plan amendment, in concert with any minor variances which may be required.

(c)Lane and Road Closing Issues:

(i)Parcel A and Parcel D:

There are three components requiring Council approval: the closing and conveyance of the O'Keefe Lane between Dundas Street and Gould Street; and the closing and conveyance, through sale or lease, of portions of the Victoria and Gould Street right-of-ways immediately abutting the site. Portions of the right-of-ways are required for the project to permit the construction above the Ryerson parking garage including column supports and exiting.

The closing of O'Keefe Lane between Dundas Street East and Dundas Square is required. As the land is being retained by the City, conveyance is not required.

(ii)Process:

In May, 1997, the former City of Toronto Council authorized the initiation of the lane closing process as may be required to undertake the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project.

A technical feasibility analysis has been undertaken with respect to these closures and appropriate terms and conditions respecting the closure will be reported to the appropriate committee of Council, following which notice is given for a public meeting and Council adoption of appropriate by-laws.

This process will commence once title is obtained by the City to the abutting lands. Consent from other affected landowners (335, 331 and 329 Yonge Street and 17 Gould Street) will be required with private rights-of-way established to maintain access from Gould Street to the rear of the Yonge Street properties as required .

(d)Parcel D (Public Square):

The Ontario Municipal Board decision requires two conditions be met with respect to ParcelD prior to August 30, 1998. The first is a "Nathan Phillips Square-type Municipal Code Amendment" which is intended to provide regulations for what activity is permitted on the square and how the square may be programmed. As this will in part depend on a number of related matters including the design of the square, funding and sponsorship opportunities and community participation, it is proposed that a general by-law be prepared now for Council's consideration with potential for amendments at a later date once other questions are answered. It is recommended that the City Solicitor be instructed to prepare such a by-law in response to the Board's decision.

A second condition relates to the design process for the square. This condition has already been addressed by the former City of Toronto Council's adoption on August 21, 1997 of a "Design and Development Process" for Parcel D. This process will commence with a working committee and technical committee shortly and will include a report back to Council regarding the retention of a Professional Advisor and Jury for the competitive portion of the process. The Board also requires the involvement of the Toronto Safe City Committee and the Toronto Police Service which was intended by the process approved in 1997.

Next Steps:

The Ontario Municipal Board requires that the Plans of Expropriation be filed by July 15, 1998. Following this, an intensive work program with respect to fulfilling the conditions of the Board's decision is to be undertaken prior to August 30, 1998.

Contact Name:

Gary Wright and Gregg Lintern, Toronto City Hall Office (392-1791 and 392-7363), Fax 392-1330

gwright@city.toronto.on.ca / glintern@city.toronto.on.ca.

--------

Appendix

Abridged Chronology - Downtown Yonge Street 1992 - 1998

March 1992 Redevelopment Application filed for 350 Yonge Street which triggers planning study
February 1993 Incorporation of Toronto East Downtown Residents Association
July 1993 Adoption of Cityplan - new Official Plan for Toronto
June 1994 City and Eatons agree on amendments to strengthen retail policies
August 1994 City Council requests a plan for improvements to Yonge and Dundas
Winter '94 - '95 Community meetings to discuss improvement issues
April 1995 Initial framework for improvements adopted by City Council
July 1995 Incorporation of the Yonge Street Business and Resident Association
City Council adopts first Improvement Plan for Yonge and Dundas
October 1995 Community Improvement Project Area by-law adopted
Winter '95 - '96 Community meetings sponsored by YSBRA and Councillor Rae to develop Regeneration Program
December 1995 Public Meeting held for Community Improvement Plan
1996 "200 Years Yonge" Celebration held all year
March 1996 City Council adopts Community Improvement Plan
City Council adopts Downtown Yonge Street Regeneration Program
City Council adopts Municipal Code amendments to permit street activities
April 1996 Planning Advisory Committee Public Meeting re: Changes to Planning Regulations for Downtown Yonge Street
June 1996 Land Use Committee adopts changes to planning regulations
August 1996 Land Use Committee defers changes to wait for results of Regeneration Program
September - December 1996 Board of Management oversees conception of Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project (Stage One Feasibility process)
December 1996 City Council approves in principle Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project and authorizes Stage Two Feasibility process
February 1997 Land Use Committee Public Meeting on changes to planning regulations and Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project
Request for Qualifications issued
March 1997 Planning Advisory Committee Public Meeting
May 1997 City Council adopts Official Plan, Community Improvement Plan and Zoning By-law amendments; Conditional agreement with PenEquity/AMC; other steps approved for the project to proceed
June 1997 Land Use Committee Public Meeting on further amendments
Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing issues Notice of Decision to approve Official Plan and Community Improvement Plan amendments
Draft Site Plan Approval discussions begin between City, PenEquity and Ryerson
July 1997 City Council adopts additional amendments
Request for Proposals Issued
Financial Advisory Board Approval granted
September 1997 Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing grants early acquisition approval
Notice of Application for Approval to Expropriate given
October 1997 City Council adopts modifications to project and instructions for OMB
November 1997 Oral Decision of the OMB setting hearing date for February 1998
February 1998 Joint Board Hearing commences respecting planning appeals and hearing of necessity
March 1998 Draft Site Plan Approval issued for Parcel A
Public Night session of the Joint Board
May 1998 Joint Board Hearing ends
June 1998 Joint Board approves planning and land expropriation
July 1998 City Council consideration of the matter
Implementation to begin if endorsed

No. 1997-0197. A BY-LAW

To permit short term borrowing from the City's entire pool of reserve funds, for the purposes of the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project, if funding from the City's working capital and other reserves is insufficient.

(Passed May 6, 1997.)

WHEREAS under Municipal Code Chapter 101, Reserves, borrowing from the City's reserve funds is limited to the Parking Meter Reserve Fund, Sewer Impost Reserve Fund and the Sewer Maintenance Reserve Fund and the amount which may be borrowed in the aggregate can not exceed $30,000,000.00;

AND WHEREAS the City's working capital and other reserves (General Fund) may not be sufficient to fund the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project;

AND WHEREAS Council, at its special meeting held on May 6, 1997 by its adoption of Communication Item No. 1(a) authorized temporary borrowing for the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project of up to $53 million from the City's entire pool of reserve funds not just the Parking Meter Reserve Fund, Sewer Impost Reserve Fund and Sewer Maintenance Reserve Fund;

THEREFORE the Council of The Corporation of the City of Toronto enacts as follows:

1.Despite Municipal Code Chapter 101, Reserves, if short term financing is required for the purposes of the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project which exceeds the funding available in the City's working capital and other reserves, the City's entire pool of reserve funds may be used for short term financing for this project up to $53 million, and the money to be repaid to the reserve funds will be repaid with interest at the same rate that the City earns on its investments.

2.This by-law shall not come into force until the approval of the Financial Advisory Board, established under the City of Toronto Act, 1997, has been obtained.

BARBARA HALL,SYDNEY K. BAXTER

Mayor.City Clerk.

Council Chamber,

Toronto, May 6, 1997.

(L.S.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee also submits the following communication (June 29, 1998) from Councillor Gardner:

Re: Yonge-Dundas Redevelopment Project - OMB Decision.

This matter has been brought to my attention by several parties which have expressed their concerns about this development.

There may be some legal liabilities which must be considered if the City decides to enter into this venture. According to discussions between my office and staff, the properties in question may be expropriated at two times density, and then sold to Pen Equity Developments at four times density. This could potentially result in a legal liability for the City where property owners at two times density, have their properties expropriated, only to have them resold at a higher density.

Further, the large scale of this complex may result in detrimental impacts on the viability of existing theatres.

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee also submits the following report (June15,1998) from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services:

Purpose:

To notify the Committee of the decision of the Ontario Municipal Board respecting the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project and to advise that a further report is forthcoming.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

To be discussed in a further report.

Recommendation:

That this report be received for information.

Comments:

On June 5, 1998 the Ontario Municipal Board issued its decision for the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project. The decision, by a Joint Board which was appointed pursuant to the Consolidated Hearings Act, considered both the related appeals before the Board.

The decision of the Board is very positive and approves the City's proposal in all respects including the necessity for the use of expropriation if required. I have attached a copy of the decision. The decision has a number of conditions for the approval and the key ones are as follows:

(1)that the newly formed City of Toronto Council endorse the commitment to proceed with the project and commit the necessary funding and confirm its intent to proceed with expropriation. The decision requires that the commitment be made by June 30, 1998 and the plans of expropriation be filed within the first two weeks of July;

(2)that the formal lease between AMC and Pen Equity and the terms of the agreements between PenEquity and the City be finalized and confirmed by July 15, 1998; and

(3)that the planning conditions (contained in Exhibit 296 and attached as Schedule "C" to the decision) shall be fulfilled on or before August 30, 1998.

Staff have asked the Board to amend condition number 1 to reflect Council's meeting dates of July8, 9 and 10, 1998.

At present, City staff are discussing with PenEquity the finalization of the agreement including risk mitigation. I will be reporting on this and other matters directly to your meeting on June 30, 1998.

Contact Name:

Gary Wright, Manager, East Section , City Planning, Phone: (416) 392-1791, Fax: (416) 392-1330

e-mail:gwright@city.toronto.on.ca.

(A copy of the Ontario Municipal Board Decision has been circulated to all Members of Council under separate cover by the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services.)

--------

The following persons appeared before the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee on June30,1998, in connection with the foregoing matter:

-Mr. Allen Karp, Chairman and CEO, Cineplex Odeon Corporation

-Mr. David Wood, on behalf of Toronto East Downtown Residents' Association

-Mr. Stan Kazman, Solicitor for Mr. John Mikrogianakis

-Mr. John Mikrogianakis

-Mr. Bob Onyschuk, Smith, Lyons, Solicitor on behalf of expropriated people

-Mr. Gary Stanoulis on behalf of Quan Developments Inc.

-Mr. Steve Rockwell

-Dr. Claude Lajeunesse, President, Ryerson Polytechnical University

-Mr. David Steele, President, Student Council, Ryerson Polytechnical University

-Mr. John S. Bailey, on behalf of Famous Players

-Mr. Arron Barberian, President, Yonge Street Business and Residents Association

-Mr. Harry Peckham, on behalf of AMC Canada

(A copy of a communication dated February 24, 1998, addressed to Councillor Rae from Mr. Eamon Kelly, Chairman, Yonge Street Business and Resident Association Inc. referred to in the report dated June 29, 1998, from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following joint report (July 7, 1998) from the Chief Administrative Officer, the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer:

Purpose:

To report on various matters requested by the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee in consideration of the final approvals for the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

This has been outlined in the June 29, 1998 report of the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)Recommendation No. (4)(c)of the June 29, 1998 report of the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services respecting Final Approvals: Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project be replaced with the following recommendation:

"The cash flow projection shown in Table 1 contained in the July 7, 1998 report be adopted and approved as the annualized budget of the project for the next 5 years."; and

(2) (a)acquisition of 299 Yonge Street be approved under terms and conditions outlined in this report; and

(b)the City Solicitor be authorized to complete the transaction and pay to the owner of 299 Yonge Street, Colekin Investments Limited, or to whomever may be found entitled to receive it, the amount of $2,425,000.00 plus adjustments as outlined in this report, and pay any expenses incurred incidental to the closing of the real property transaction, including the payment of the Land Transfer Tax, estimated to be in the amount of $37,200.00 from Account #216692.

Council Reference:

At its meeting of June 30, 1998 the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommended the adoption of the report (June 29, 1998) from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services respecting the final approvals required to implement the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project.

The Committee requested that the following reports be submitted directly to City Council on July8, 1998:

(a)the City Auditor to review the financial statements and business plans for the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project and report on the financial risks to the City;

(b)the Chief Administrative Officer to report on a critical path and a process to raise funds for this project under the Section 37 Agreements and/or the use of benefiting levies; and

(c)the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services to report on all the figures related to costs and benefits to the City during the next 10 years.

This report responds jointly to items (b) and (c).

Comments:

The former City of Toronto Council approved permanent financing of $14.4 million for the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project, essentially as a cost of acquiring land for municipal purposes on Parcel D - the location for the public square and a 250-space below-grade parking garage. The source of the funds for this net cost was approved as reserve funds, debentures, or a combination of the above with the exact source of financing to determined as the Project neared completion.

The acceptance of a net cost to the City was premised on the basis that this is an investment in civic infrastructure and that this is a community improvement project designed to be a catalyst for private redevelopment in the vicinity. As a catalyst, the investment is projected to generate direct tax revenue (present value) and levies of $15.1 million and spin-off tax revenue (present value) of $24.9 million. While the pro forma for the Project showed these tax benefits "below the line" ie. not considered in terms of immediate financial cash flow, these tax benefits, when taken into account, generate a positive financial gain for the City from the Project.

Notwithstanding the offsetting benefit from tax revenue, other means have been identified which, while not reason in themselves for undertaking the Project, were understood to be of potential value to the City as measures to offset the net cost of the Project. These offsetting benefits are itemized, along with the Project costs, in a detailed overview contained in Table 2 at the end of this report.

The table includes items which have been identified throughout the continuing process of refining a financial pro forma for the Project since the late fall of 1996 and refining the PenEquity/City Agreement since it was initially signed in September 1997.

This responds to the request of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee for all figures relating to the costs and the benefits for the next 10 years.

Summary of Costs and Benefits:

While it is not the intention to directly compare costs and benefits for this Project, largely because some of the items are not finally determined and some benefits will flow to the City over a projected 10 to 20 year period, it is estimated that the present value of the benefits generally outweigh the costs 2 to 1.

The quantitative presentation of costs and benefits does not include consideration of qualitative benefits or financial benefits to Ryerson Polytechnic University which were outlined in the June 29, 1998 report to Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee. For example, the Project will include Public Art, which is valued at $1 million for Parcel A and improvements to public sidewalks on Yonge, Dundas and Victoria Street, all costs to be borne by PenEquity or Ryerson as per the agreements which are being entered into. With respect to the Ryerson benefits, Ryerson has previously estimated the cumulative net value of the benefits to Ryerson over 20 years at $17.1 million.

Recommendation No. (3) of the aforementioned June 29, 1998 report recommended in part that the ways and means of reducing the net cost of the Project i.e., replenishing the reserve funds, be determined and reported on. The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee requested a report on a critical path and a process to raise funds for this project under Section 37 Agreements and/or the use of benefiting levies. These items have been quantified at $2.5 million (over 10 years) and $5.0-10.0 million (over 20 years). Estimates of the value of other potential benefits are also outlined in the table included in this report.

With respect to Section 37 benefits, the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services will start exercising this approach at the first opportunity within the Community Improvement Project Area, as anticipated in the Official Plan, and other lands which may see redevelopment as a result of the City's revitalization initiative through Official Plan amendments.

With respect to the benefiting levy, the implementation will be dependent on a more final determination of net costs and methods of financing. Further work will be undertaken on this approach and reported to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee within the next six months as these matters are addressed.

Table 1 below provides a summary of the cash flow projections for the Project and the potential recovery from various sources. Greater detail with respect to these projections are provided in the aforementioned Table 2.

Table 1

Cash Flow Projections and Financing

($millions)

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Total

Estimated Costs:
Land Assembly - 35.7 7.5 - - 43.2
Public Square Improvements - - 0.5 2.0 - 2.5
Soft Costs (consultants, appraisals, legal fees, etc.) 0.8 0.5 - - - 1.3
Contingency - - - 6.0 - 6.0
Total Estimated Costs 0.8 36.2 8.0 8.0 0 53.0

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Total

Estimated Revenues:
Sale of Commercial Land and Rights - - 21.5 12.5 - 34.0
Additional Potential Compensation for Land Values - - - - 3.0 3.0
Potential Leasing Income from Parcel B - - 1.6 - - 1.6
Total Estimated Revenues 0 0 23.1 12.5 3.0 38.6
Net Estimated Costs to be Permanently Financed 14.4

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

Total

Section 37 Benefits: 4.3
Potential Net Benefitting Levy (in present value terms) 5-10
Potential Sale of Naming Rights 5
Increase in property tax revenue resulting from Project (in present value terms) 15.1
Increase in property tax revenue resulting from spinoff redevelopment (in present value terms) 24.9

Additional Matters Respecting Land Acquisitions

At its meeting of June 30, 1998, the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommended in part that the approval of final financial settlements with landowners be granted by the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and Council. There is one financial settlement to report thus far.

299 Yonge Street:

The former City of Toronto Council on May 6, 1997, granted authority to enter into a conditional agreement of purchase and sale regarding 299 Yonge Street on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Commissioner, Corporate Services, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor. An Offer to Sell signed by the owner, Colekin Investments Limited, on April 16, 1997, for the sale of 299 Yonge Street to the City has been agreed to. The purchase price is $2,425,000 and the sale is conditional on:

(a)approval of the OMB for the acquisition; and

(b)amendments to the Community Improvement Plan have been approved, and the Official Plan and Zoning By-law have been passed.

The closing date is to be 30 days following satisfaction of the conditions. In addition to the purchase price, the purchaser is required to pay reasonable costs associated with the transaction, including legal and consultants fees.

The Offer to Sell was amended by the Owner to extend the Offer to July 31, 1998. Under the terms of the extension, the purchase price is to be adjusted, on closing, by an amount calculated on the basis of the number of days from January 1, 1998 to the closing date, divided by 365 and multiplied by 7 percent.

Environmental reports have been completed by the City's consultant, AGRA Earth and Environmental Limited, on its historical use (Phase I), designated substance survey of the building as well as a limited Phase II soil sampling near the subject property. Only the building audit revealed some remediation work is required. The consultant has identified potential asbestos wrapped piping and two 250 gallon above ground storage tanks which must be disposed of upon demolition. Also the light ballast containing PCBs must be stored in accordance with the Ministry of Environment requirements.

Contact Name:

Gary Wright or Gregg Lintern

Toronto City Hall Office

Telephone: (416) 392-1791 and 392-7363

Fax: (416) 392-1330

gwright1@city.toronto.on.ca / glintern@city.toronto.on.ca)

Table 2

Costs and Benefits - 10 Year Projection Overview (Except where noted)

#

Subject

Source/Comment

Costs

Benefits

1 Commercial Land Assembly (inc. soft costs) Jan 16/98 project pro forma prepared by KPMG $25.2 million
2 Public Square Land Assembly (inc. soft costs) Jan 16/98 project pro forma prepared by KPMG $16.3 million
3 Interest Jan 16/98 project pro forma prepared by KPMG $2.3 million
4 Replacement of

277 Victoria; Move/Improve for 277 Victoria Replacement

Part of larger decisions re: office space needs for new City; these costs may be otherwise assumed (estimated by City Property) move/improve costs for 277 Victoria Street assumed at $1.8 million
5 Sale of Commercial Land and Rights (Parcel A) Jan 16/98 project pro forma prepared by KPMG $37.0 million
6 Direct Project tax revenue and levies Jan 15/98 tax impact study prepared by Peter Viducis, City of Toronto, Economic Development $15.1 million (20 year Present Value) (includes parks levy of 2% of land value)
7 Spin-off Tax Revenue Jan 15/98 tax impact study prepared by Peter Viducis $24.9 million (20 year Present Value)
8 Public Square Improvement Costs incl. Demolition on Parcel D Jan 16/98 project pro forma (estimated by Urban Planning and Development Services) $2.5 million
9 Square Naming Rights and Other Sponsorship Jan 16/98 Report prepared by Ketchum Canada Inc. $5 million minimum for naming; other sponsorship opportunities not quantified
10 Section 37 Benefits from Parcel B Jan 16/98 project pro forma prepared by KPMG $1.8 million estimated
11 Section 37 Benefits from other redevelopment within the CIP area Not previously estimated: egs . Include Yonge and Queen - office redevelopment;

Bay & Dundas - TEC Phase II lands;

College Park - 2 vacant sites;

Other Yonge Street sites undetermined

Assume $2.5 million (estimated as average $500,000 contribution every 2 years for 10 years)
12 Potential Use of Benefiting Levy Jan 15/98 Report prepared by Cam Watson Associates $470,000 -$945,000 annual ($5-10 million recovery over 20 years)
13 Value of City Participation Included as buy-out value of $ 4 million in Line 5 above (City/PenEquity Agreement)
14 Property Management Costs Likely a "wash" because of rents paid to the City between July 15/97 and Jan 15/98
15 Unidentified Incidental Costs Budget Allocation requested in June 29/98 report; amount to be determined
16 Interim Revenue from Parcel B lands Jan. 16th pro forma $1.6 million
17 Sale of City-owned property within the CIP area including unused density on property retained by the City Potential incremental value of:

Parcel B including 277 Victoria Street;

197 Yonge Street;

201 Yonge Street (Jazz Place);

205 Yonge Street (Unused Density)

$2 million estimated
18 Sale of ROW to Parcel C Proponents; Section 37 Requirement for Parcel C To be finalized in negotiations pertaining to sale of Parcel C Undetermined amount
19 Amendment to PenEquity Agreement re: potential land price increases $3 million potential
20 Sewer Impost Fees (Parcel A only) $270,000 estimated
TOTAL PROJECTED VALUE OF COSTS AND BENEFITS $48.1 million $93.2 - $98.2 million

(A copy of the location plan (Figure 1) and the sketch of the development parcels (Figure 2), which were appended to the foregoing report, are on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

(City Council also had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following report (July 2, 1998) from the City Auditor:

Recommendation:

It is recommended that this report be received for information.

Background:

At its meeting on June 30, 1998, the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee requested that the following report be submitted directly to City Council on July 8, 1998:

"The City Auditor to review the financial statements and business plans for the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project and report on the financial risks to the City."

The Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project involves the assembly of land on the east side of YongeStreet north and south of Dundas Street. In general terms, the project involves the acquisition, or potential expropriation if negotiated settlements are not achievable, of property included in four distinct parcels of land, as indicated in Schedule A attached. Details relating to each parcel are as follows:

(1)Parcel A includes the acquisition/expropriation of six properties north of Dundas Street, as well as the sale of air rights over the Ryerson parking garage. Through a request for qualifications process and industry consultations which were held in late 1996 and early 1997, the former City of Toronto selected a private developer to purchase and develop this parcel. An agreement to sell land was subsequently entered into with Pen Equity Management Corporation;

(2)Parcel B includes two properties, one of which will be subject to acquisition/expropriation. The second property is owned by the City. The former City of Toronto Council authorized staff to negotiate an agreement with the owners of the other property in order to maintain a development option for Parcel B that would include both properties;

(3)Parcel C includes the acquisition/expropriation of one piece of property and involves the development of a retail edge around a public square on Parcel D; and

(4)Parcel D includes the acquisition/expropriation of four pieces of property. The parcel also includes a parking lot operated by the Parking Authority at 25DundasStreetEast. The proposed use is a public square with a below grade parking facility operated by the Parking Authority.

In a report from the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services, dated June 29, 1998, to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, entitled "Final Approvals: Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project (Downtown)", it was indicated that the total costs prior to recoveries associated with this project are $53.0 million. The net costs of the project is estimated to be $14.4million.

Comments:

Detailed financial projections have been prepared by KPMG, Chartered Accountants, as of January16,1998, in relation to the Yonge Street Development project. The financial information relied upon by KPMG and contained in the projections is based on information provided by City of Toronto staff as well as property appraisals from Stewart, Young, Hillershein & Atlin Limited, Real Estate Appraisers and Consultants. The accounting firm of Price Waterhouse was also involved in certain components of the property appraisals which included quantifying business losses and disturbance damages resulting from the acquisition or expropriation of the commercial properties. Certain of the data contained in the financial projections are based on specific provisions of legal agreements. Other financial information provided is based on assumptions of future events.

In preparing this report, I have met with representatives from KPMG and Stewart, Young, Hillershein & Atlin Limited, in order to review the available financial information in support of the project as well as the assumptions made in connection with the financial information. I have also reviewed the background and qualifications of the individuals responsible for preparing the financial information. In addition, I have reviewed the decision of the Ontario Municipal Board dated June5, 1998.

KPMG have been involved in the financial analysis of this project since its inception and were called before the Ontario Municipal Board to provide evidence in support of the project. In the "Decision and Reasons for Decision" of the Board dated June 5, 1998, it was noted that KPMG's "evidence to the Board, was thorough, comprehensive, complete and solid. The Board was left with KPMG's conclusions, which it supports, that the financial risks have been addressed responsibility with a net benefit to the City". The Board also indicated that the Board adopts the opinion of KPMG "and finds that the project is "do-able", at minimal risk to the City."

Financial Information:

Project Revenue:

The agreement between the former City of Toronto and Pen Equity Management Corporation contemplates a payment of $30.0 million to the City consisting of the following:

(1)$24.0 million relating to Parcel A;

(2)$1.0 million payment to Ryerson for air rights over the existing above ground parking garage owned by Ryerson; and

(3)$5.0 million relating to the conveyance of O'Keefe Lane and portions of the Victoria and Gould Street rights-of-ways and payment in lieu of parking for the project.

In addition to the $30.0 million, the City is entitled to be paid out for future profit participation in the amount of $2.75 million. Consequently, the agreement contemplates a payment of $32.75 million.

Recently, negotiations have taken place resulting in additional contributions by Pen Equity Management Corporation to the municipality. This amending agreement requires Pen Equity to provide up to an additional $3.0 million if land costs rise. It also increases the level of profit participation from $2.75 million to $4.0 million. Both of these adjustments increase the maximum potential contribution from Pen Equity Management Corporation to $37.0 million. My review indicated that the amending agreement has not yet been finalized.

In summary, after the deduction of $1.0 million to Ryerson, consideration of $36.0 million is available for the acquisition of the Parcel A property as well as the payment for the lane, the right of way portions and consideration in lieu of parking.

In addition to the revenue from Pen Equity, an amount of $1.6 million has been included in the projections relating to potential leasing income from Parcel B, as well as projected rental income from the time of expropriation to the date of development.

Project Costs:

The major portion of the cost of $53.0 million relating to the project pertains to costs associated with the acquisition/expropriation of property. Individual appraisal reports for each property were prepared by Stewart, Young, Hillershein & Atlin Limited. The effective date of each appraisal was December 10, 1996, which was the date the public announcement was made relating to the Yonge Street Regeneration Project. This particular date is important as the City's position with respect to land compensation is guided by section 14(4)(b) of the Expropriations Act which states that "in determining the market value of land, no account shall be taken of any increase or decrease in the value resulting from the development or the imminence of the development in respect of which the expropriation is made or from any expropriation or imminent prospect of expropriation."

However, notwithstanding Section 14(4)(b) of the Expropriations Act, Stewart, Young, Hillershein and Atlin Limited on January 18, 1998, provided the City with a consulting letter dealing with the changes in market conditions between December 10, 1996 and January 18, 1998. In the opinion of the consultant, the market was determined to have increased between 20 percent and 25 percent from the earlier effective date. The updated valuation was not a formal appraisal but was limited to changes in market conditions, including (then) current sales and listings.

Even allowing for an increase of the original property valuations by 25 percent, the amounts provided in the financial projections supporting the $53.0 million in total costs continue to be significantly in excess of the revised valuations. It is worth noting that the current projected value of the expropriated properties would have to increase by a further 15 percent in order to exceed the $14.4 million budget provided by staff.

In support of the land values included in the projections is a conditional sale relating to one of the properties in Parcel D. The sale price is within the values included in the financial projections.

Other components included in the total cost of the project are:

(a)interest expenses relating to projected cash flow requirements; and

(b)consulting costs including those related to the Ontario Municipal Board hearing.

These costs/estimates appear reasonable.

In terms of cash flow, it should be noted that the City will be required to make significant payments to property owners prior to the receipt of funds from Pen Equity Management Corporation. Plans of expropriation are scheduled to be registered before July 15, 1998, and it is anticipated that within 3 months, offers of compensation will be forwarded to all property owners. Depending on the expropriation amounts the liability at that time could be in the range of $35.0 million.

Financial Risk to the City:

(1)The net cost to the City is $14.4 million which is predicated on appraisal/expropriation values being consistent with the financial projections. If the value of the property expropriations exceed these predetermined amounts then the City is at risk due to the fact that funds due from Pen Equity Management Corporation are capped at a level of $37.0 million (assuming the amending agreement is finalized).

(2)A further potential financial risk to the City relates to the financial viability of Pen Equity Management Corporation. It is my understanding that the financial background of Pen Equity Management Corporation was reviewed by Finance staff from the former City of Toronto. I understand that the results of this review satisfied all parties in terms of Penn Equity Management Corporation being able to satisfy its commitments in regards to this proposal. My review did not encompass an analysis of the work done by former City of Toronto staff.

(3)The agreement with Pen Equity Management Corporation requires that they guarantee to Ryerson during the development phase, a certain level of revenue from the Ryerson Parking Garage. The guarantee relates to the annual gross receipts received by Ryerson not being less than the average annual total gross receipts received by Ryerson during the three-year period immediately prior to the execution of the Agreement.

In addition to this specific guarantee, Pen Equity have also guaranteed that for each annual period during a 20-year period following expiry of the development phase, gross receipts received from the Parking Garage shall not be less than the Guaranteed Parking Revenue.

Ryerson has requested that the City stand behind Pen Equity's guarantee of the revenue from the Parking Garage. The City's guarantee would be for a total of $1.5 million during the construction period and for $750,000.00 from substantial completion until there was a two-year period of no claims on the guarantee.

The financial risk to the City in this regard, would obviously relate to Pen Equity failing to fulfill its parking revenue guarantee. The guarantee at that point would revert to the City. However, if the City assumes that obligation, it has recourse to place a mortgage on lands owned by Pen Equity in the amount of the default.

(4)It should be noted also that there will be costs involved in not proceeding with this particular project. A penalty of $500,000.00 is payable to Pen Equity if the project is discontinued along with the write off of approximately $2.0 million in staff time and consulting fees.

The following could be considered as a possible means of cushioning any adverse increase in costs that might be experienced in assembling the required property. However, there is no current information available relating to the financial benefits which may accrue to the City as a result of these particular issues. Consequently, my review in this regard has been limited to discussions with City staff.

It is also my understanding that a report from the CAO addresses these matters.

(1)Imposition of a Benefiting Levy

Pursuant to special legislation passed for the City in 1976 the City can impose a benefiting area tax rate to be levied in order to obtain a financial contribution from benefiting landowners with respect to the City's plan to provide the public park. A detailed study has been conducted by a third party consultant entitled "Potential Use of the City of Toronto Act re Capital Funding for the Yonge Dundas Public Square." The consultant has indicated a potential revenue source of $5.0 - $10.0million of the project cost.

(2)Section 37 of the Planning Act

Additional revenues may arise as a result of Section 37 of the Planning Act (in connection with ParcelB).

(3)Naming Rights

The assessment of naming rights has been based, in part, on the recent sale of naming rights for the North York Centre for Performing Arts now renamed the Ford Centre, and the former O'Keefe Centre now renamed the Hummingbird Centre. The extent of these naming rights has not yet been determined.

(4)Direct and Indirect Tax Revenue

Staff have projected direct tax revenue and levies of $15.1 million and spin-off tax revenue of $24.9million as a result of this project. Time constraints did not allow for a review of the reasonableness of these amounts.

Conclusions:

Due to the uncertainties of future events, the potential financial risks to the City can not be eliminated. The financial projections indicate that staff have included conservative estimates in relation to the anticipated costs of land acquisitions. Even allowing for the fact that acquisitions through expropriations are generally more costly, the estimates continue to be reasonable.

As indicated in the body of the report, the major financial risk to the City in regards to this project relates to the costs of expropriation. If the value of the property expropriations exceed the amounts provided by staff, then the City is at risk due to the fact that the agreement with Pen Equity Management Corporation provides for a capped contribution of $37 million as outlined in the amending agreement.

The risks to the City have been mitigated by the potential for additional revenue from:

(1)the imposition of a benefitting levy;

(2)levies as a result of Section 37 of the Planning Act;

(3)naming rights; and

(4)direct and indirect tax revenue.

At the completion of the project, the City will also own a valuable parcel of property which will be used as a public square.

Contact Name and Telephone No.:

Jeff Griffiths, 392-8461.)

(A copy of the plan showing the four development parcels (Schedule A), referred to the foregoing report, is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

(City Council also had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following communications:

(i)(July7, 1998) from Mr. Clifford G. Narbey, Vice President and Director of Administration, AMC Theatres of Canada Inc., providing information with respect to "mega-theatres"; and

(ii)(July 2, 1998) from B. S. Onyschuk, Smith Lyons, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owners of 285, 301, and 315 Yonge Street, submitting comments on the Yonge Dundas Redevelopment Project; providing a copy of the Alternative Development Scheme for this Project; and recommending that the private sector option is the best route for the City of Toronto to pursue in this regard.)

27

2008 Toronto Olympic Bid City Agreement

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, amended this Clause by:

(1)adding to Appendix 4, entitled "Group Lists", of the report dated June 24, 1998, from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, the following:

(a)Parkdale Tenants' Association;

(b)Parkdale Community Legal Services;

(c)Parkdale Intercultural Association;

(d)Parkdale Liberty Economic Development Committee; and

(e)Parkdale Business Improvement Area; and

(2)adding thereto the following:

"It is further recommended that:

(1)the report dated July 8, 1998, from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, entitled '2008 Toronto Olympic Bid - Supplementary Report', embodying the following recommendation, be adopted:

'It is recommended that Council endorse the appointment to the inaugural Board of Directors of the 2008 Olympic Bid Corporation (TO-Bid), those persons named in Part 2 of this report.';

(2)the Board of Directors of TO-Bid be requested to:

(a)hold open and public meetings, except where matters require confidentiality;

(b)fully disclose to City Council and the people of Toronto all budgets and financial statements;

(c)provide regular updates and reports to City Council and to the people of Toronto;

(d)establish an inter-jurisdictional advisory group to address the issue of public safety; and

(e)establish a further Group List under the heading of 'Ethno-Cultural Groups', wherein the City's representative ethnic and cultural groups that wish to participate in the Olympic Games process can do so;

(3)the Olympic Bid be an open and public process;

(4)the following motions be referred to TO-Bid for further consideration:

Moved by Councillor Cho:

'It is further recommended that the following persons be added to the Board of Directors of TO-Bid:

(1)Mr. Young Lee, President, Korean-Canadian Importers/Exporters Association; and

(2)Mr. Charlie Chang, President, Federation of Korean-Canadian Associations in Canada.'

Moved by Councillor Moscoe:

'It is further recommended that the following persons be added to the Board of Directors of TO-Bid:

(1)Councillor Anne Johnston, North Toronto; and

(2)Councillor David Miller, High Park.'

Moved by Councillor Rae:

'It is further recommended that following persons be added to the Board of Directors of TO-Bid:

(1)Mr. Mark Deacon, President, Smart Toronto; and

(2)Ms. Alison Bain, Government Relations Director of Toronto International Festival.'

Moved by Councillor Silva:

'It is further recommended that the following persons be added to the Board of Directors of TO-Bid:

(1)Mr. Frank Alvarez, President, CIRV FM; and

(2)Mr. Tony Dionisio, Business Manager, Local 183.'

Moved by Councillor Tzekas:

'It is further recommended that Ms. Effie Triantafilopoulos be added to the Board of Directors of TO-Bid.';

(5)community meetings take place in areas where Olympic events will be hosted;

(6)a comprehensive housing strategy be developed as a part of the next stage of the development of the Bid, taking into account the issues emerging in Sydney, Australia, such strategy to be developed in conjunction with a broad range of stakeholders in the housing sector;

(7)the City of Toronto withdraw its support of the Bid if the provision of satisfactory financial guarantees from other levels of government and satisfactory financial support from the private sector or otherwise for the City's liability under the Host City Agreement and the Olympic Charter have not been received before November, 1999;

(8)the Chief Administrative Officer be requested to submit a report to the Economic Development Committee on issues related to ensuring diversity in the award of contracts, master licensing agreements, etc., which may include 'set asides' and/or other mechanisms to ensure economic participation in a successful Olympic Bid of minority-owned businesses;

(9)the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism be requested to:

(a)submit a report to Council, through the Economic Development Committee, in the fall of 1998, on a by-law and proposed strategy to ensure full protection for tenants and homeless persons during the hosting of the Olympic Games, particularly in areas adjacent to potential facilities such as South Parkdale;

(b)submit reports to Council, through the Economic Development Committee, on:

(i)the composition, mandate and Terms of Reference of a City Council Task Force to provide oversight and independent assessment in the areas of social and fiscal responsibility for the Olympic games; the Members of such Task Force to be recommended by the Striking Committee; and

(ii)the 2004 Cultural Olympiad and how City Council and the 2008 TO-Bid Committee can incorporate the concept of culture into the City of Toronto's Olympic Bid;

(c)provide a detailed presentation and briefing in regard to the status of the Olympic Bid for Members of Council at least one week prior to the regularly scheduled meeting of Council to be held in October, 1998; and

(d)contact the Greek Community of Metropolitan Toronto Inc. and the Alliance of Portuguese Clubs and Associations of Ontario, among other groups, with a view to including these groups in a further Group List under the heading of 'Ethno-Cultural Groups';

(10)the Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services be requested to:

(a)include in the previously requested report on transportation issues which is to be submitted to City Council for its meeting to be held on November25, 1998, the City's transportation plans and proposals which would significantly enhance Toronto's Bid and provide the City with significant transportation legacies, with specific attention to improving public transit, including a rapid transit link to Pearson airport; and

(b)submit a report to the Urban Environment and Development Committee on the possible impacts of the Olympic Bid on the new City of Toronto Official Plan process;

(11)the City Solicitor be requested to submit a report to the Economic Development Committee on the Mayor's ability to participate as the Chief Executive Officer for the City of Toronto given the composition of the Bid Committee;

(12)the communication dated June 24, 1998, from Mr. David Hulchanski, Professor of Housing and Community Development, entitled 'Housing and Social Impacts of the Olympics: An Update from Sydney', be referred to following parties concerned with the Olympic Bid Agreement:

(a)the TO-Bid Committee;

(b)the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism;

(c)the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services; and

(d)the Homeless Advisory Committee; and

(13)Council express its appreciation to the TO-Bid Committee for their efforts on Toronto's Olympic Bid to date.")

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends that:

1.City Council ratify the Bid City Agreement signed by the Mayor in Calgary, Alberta and adopt the report (June 24, 1998) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism concerning Council ratification of the agreement between the City and the Canadian Olympic Association defining their relationship, roles and responsibilities in bidding for the 2008 Olympic Games in Toronto and recommending that City officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, including participating in the incorporation and organization of TO-Bid required under the agreement; and

2.a Sub-Committee of TO-Bid be formed to address the disability and access issues, given that the Paralympics follow the Olympics and that an accessibility assessment be conducted.

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having:

(a)referred the concerns raised by the deputants to the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism for a report directly to Council on July 8, 1998;

(b)referred the communication (June 30, 1998) from Councillor Layton setting out his concept for the Olympic Village to the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism for consideration and a report back to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee;

(c)requested the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism to consult with Mr. Charles Smedmor with respect to his submission entitled "Toronto 2008 - the Olympic Costs and Benefits;

(d)referred the following suggested amendments to the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism for consideration and a report back to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee:

(i)That the agreement be modified to replace "periodical reports" with "quarterly reports" in Clause 3(g);

(ii)That a new definition be inserted in Clause 1 (Definitions) as follows:

"City" means "Toronto City Council"; and

(iii)That Clause 4(vi) be amended to indicate that City Council may delegate certain specific approval authorities to the Chief Administrative Officer and the Chief Administrative Officer submit a list of those defined authorities which are deemed appropriate for delegation from City Council to City Council for approval; and

(e)requested the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism to report on the implications of Clauses 4(d)(ii) and (iii) on Page 9 of the agreement and the potential liabilities.

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following report (June 24, 1998) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism:

Purpose:

(1)to update Council on Toronto Olympic bid;

(2)to seek Council ratification of the 2008 Toronto Olympic Bid City Agreement reached between the City of Toronto, the Canadian Olympic Association (COA) and TO-Bid (BIDCO, 2008 Toronto Olympic Bid Corporation);

(3)to advise Council on the structure of the new bid group to be renamed TO-Bid; and

(4)to outline the staff work program and public consultation process.

Financial Implications:

None arising from this report.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that the Committee adopt the report (June 24, 1998) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism concerning Council ratification of the agreement between the City and the Canadian Olympic Association defining their relationship, roles and responsibilities in bidding for the 2008 Olympic Games in Toronto and recommending that City officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, including participating in the incorporation and organization of TO-Bid required under the agreement.

Comments:

1.General Update:

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) in all likelihood will outline its process and timelines for the 2008 bid after the current round of bidding for the 2006 Winter Games is completed in June 1999. Staff will report further on the revised schedule respective to the bid book submission in the next quarterly report to Council, scheduled for October, 1998 or as soon as the IOC makes it known.

There is little reliable information on candidate cities for the 2008 Games. Olympic trade papers are covering the 2006 candidate cities. Presently the only confirmed competition is Osaka, Japan. Reported competition includes Beijing, Shanghai, Seville, Istanbul, and Buenos Aires. Other possible competitors could include Cape Town, Cairo, and Paris.

2.Bid City Agreement:

2.1Bid City Agreement -- XXIX Olympic Games in the Year 2008

City Council at its meeting of March 4, 5 and 6, 1998 authorized staff to negotiate an agreement between the City, the Canadian Olympic Association (COA) and the bid corporation (TO-Bid) to define their relationship, roles and responsibilities in bidding for the XXIX Olympic Games in Toronto, the form and content of the agreement being subject to the approval of Council (the Bid City Agreement).

It is a standing condition of the COA that for any city wishing to present to the COA, that the terms and conditions of the Bid City Agreement be finalized and the agreement be available for execution at the COA meeting at which the vote is taken. In respect of the Toronto bid, that meeting occurred on April 18, 1998. Accordingly, once the City's application to bid for the Olympic Games in 2008 was accepted by the COA, the agreement negotiated by staff was executed by Mayor Lastman on behalf of the City. The agreement contains the express provision that its execution signifies only the intent of the signatories to enter into a binding agreement and that approval by City Council is required before it becomes binding on the City. It further provides that only if the agreement is ratified by City Council in a manner satisfactory to the COA, no later than its regular July 1998 meeting, will it be binding. This provides an opportunity for the COA Executive Committee to assess whether City Council support is sufficient for the bid to move forward before the agreement becomes binding on the parties.

Members of Council received a memorandum (April 20, 1998) from Michael Garrett, the CAO, which provided a summary of the main provisions of the agreement. Subsequently, Councillors received a copy of the Bid City Agreement in its entirety. The Bid City Agreement sets out detailed responsibilities relating to the bid and addresses transitional and other responsibilities that will follow if the bid is successful.

2.2The Bid Stage

The agreement provides for the organization of a not-for-profit corporation, which will have responsibility for raising the necessary funds to support the City's bid as well as assisting in the preparation, organization and presentation of the bid to host the 2008 Olympic Games. The City in co-operation with the COA and TO-Bid have undertaken to pursue a broad and extensive public consultation process, the first phase of which is detailed in this report.

The Bid City Agreement places several controls and restrictions on the operation of TO-Bid to best protect the City and the COA from incurring any financial liability as a result of submitting the bid, to ensure the bid is developed in a way that is satisfactory to the City and the COA, and to ensure that the provisions of the Olympic Charter and International Olympic Committee directions are met.

(i)the Bid City Agreement provides that the Board of Directors of TO-Bid be appointed by the COA (one-third) and the City (two-thirds) and that all persons appointed be mutually agreed upon by the COA and the City;

(ii)TO-Bid will be required to adopt a budget that ensures the proper fiscal management of the corporation and a strategic plan setting out its role and responsibility in securing the Games for the City and the COA. The approval of at least 75 percent of the Board is required to adopt, and once adopted, to amend each of the budget and strategic plan, thereby ensuring accountability;

(iii)TO-Bid will appoint a member of its Board as Audit Chair and the Audit Chair will be responsible for making periodic reports to the COA and City on financial matters;

(iv)TO-Bid will be solely responsible for raising the necessary funds to promote the Olympic bid, including international promotion. The COA will use its resources to assist with the bid and its promotion;

(v)(TO-Bid is expressly prohibited from borrowing money or spending more money than it has raised;

(vi)The City Auditor will have the right to inspect the books and records of TO-Bid for the purpose of assessing whether the corporation has adhered to the obligations imposed on it that prohibit it from spending more money than it has raised or has received firm commitments for, and to ensure that it has not borrowed any funds;

(vii)the City and TO-Bid are required to indemnify the COA against liability for all losses and expenses related to the bid except where the conduct of COA was unauthorized or where the COA has expressly ratified a commitment. TO-Bid will be required to indemnify the City for any and all commitments, losses or expenses arising as a result of the agreement and to obtain insurance if the City requests it; and

(viii)With respect to fundraising, the agreement sets out the requirement for COA approval for the use of any intellectual property (trademarks or official marks) relating to the bid and to the use of the Olympic symbol. It requires the COA to promote the bid to its official sponsors and suppliers and sets out specific provisions restricting advertising rights in this regard.

2.3Provisions following the award of the Games by the IOC:

After the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has made its decision respecting the award of the Olympic Games, and assuming that the Games are awarded to the Canadian Olympic Association and the City of Toronto, the Bid City Agreement provides for the dissolution of TO-Bid and the formation of an organizing committee for the Olympic Games ("OCOG"). Membership on the board of OCOG will again be appointed by the COA (one third) and the City (two-thirds), with the requirement that all members be mutually agreed upon by the City and the COA. An interim management team will be established immediately upon the awarding of the Games to deal with transitional matters involved in the awarding of the Games and to be responsible for the incorporation of the OCOG. The interim team will be jointly chaired by the City and the COA.

In the event that the City and COA's bid for the 2008 Games is successful, the City and the COA will be required to sign a Host City contract with the IOC. Following the incorporation of OCOG, the City and the COA will cause OCOG to sign the agreement. The IOC Host City contract sets out the obligations of the parties and provides for matters such as the organization of the sports program and the cultural program, the Olympic Village and media and Olympic family accommodation, the Olympic ceremonies, flame and torch relay, television and radio broadcasting provisions, advertising and marketing of the Olympic Games, media contracts, admission tickets and other matters respecting the marketing and financing of the Olympic Games themselves. The agreement also provides for the division of any surplus at the conclusion of the Games and sets out general provisions respecting the way in which funds will be provided to the Host City from media contracts and otherwise, to finance infrastructure for the Games.

The Bid City Agreement contemplates that there will be additional agreements to be entered into, one being a Host City contract between the COA, the City and others respecting promotion and marketing of the Games and other matters as well. As the terms of future agreements are not yet known, it is premature to speculate any further regarding what they may be. Council approval will be required before the City could enter into any future agreements, and they will be the subject of future reports.

Finally, Council should be aware that there are two opportunities for the City or the COA to opt out of any obligations it has undertaken in the Bid City Agreement once Council has ratified the Bid City Agreement:

(i)if the IOC Host City Agreement is substantially different than the agreement signed for the Athens Games in 2004 (Schedule 4 to the Bid City Agreement); or

(ii)if Provincial and Federal government support, both financial and otherwise, is not satisfactory to the City and/or the COA.

3.Toronto Olympic Bid Corporation

3.1Toronto Olympic Bid Corporation:

Prior to the presentation of the City's application to the COA, representatives from the COA, BIDCO and the City agreed on their respective roles and responsibilities in advancing the bid, subject to approval by the COA.

One such provision included the creation of a new, incorporated bid group. This new group will replace BIDCO. BIDCO representatives will continue to work with the City and the COA. A draft organizational chart is attached as Appendix 1. BIDCO Chair, David Crombie, will assume the position of Chair of the Board of Directors. A twelve person Executive Committee, which will include Mr. Crombie, will be appointed by the Board. The Executive Committee will name its own Chair.

Staffing of various functional areas will include both paid staff and volunteers including corporate, in-kind services. The majority of the staff will include broad volunteer representation.

3.2Roles and Responsibilities of the Board of Directors:

The Board of Directors will primarily be responsible for establishing corporate policy and priorities that will provide the foundation of a successful bid while adhering to the core principles of the Corporation's mandate. That mandate, as endorsed by City Council, is to represent the City in the bid competition in a prudent, accountable manner and to define the program for an Olympic Games that will be socially responsible, environmentally progressive and financially sound.

The Board will be supported in its mission by the Executive Committee from which it will receive recommendations on major policy, strategy and program initiatives.

The City and the COA will have the authority to remove or augment members to the Board of Directors as it deems necessary, in order to fulfill the requirements of the Board.

Membership on the Board will:

(i)reflect the diversity of the city;

(ii)reflect the ability to generate and hold the confidence and support of all sectors of the community, including the financial community;

(iii)foster a new generation of leadership in Olympism; and

(iv)include representation from the business, labour, sport and cultural sectors.

As the City's principal representative, the Mayor of the City of Toronto, or his designate as an ex-officio member, may sit on any or all committees.

3.3Roles and Responsibilities of the Executive Committee:

Appointments to the Executive Committee will made by the Board of Directors. Its principal roles and responsibilities will include:

(i)approval of the Corporation's operating and capital budgets;

(ii)approval of the Corporation's financial statements;

(iii)approval of fundraising and any other revenue generating activity by or for the Corporation;

(iv)hiring the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer and approval of all changes to other senior management on the recommendation of the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer;

(v)development and implementation of the international strategy to advance the bid; and

(vi)advancement of the Corporation's relations with all levels of government and with persons inside and outside Canada, including foreign governments and persons associated with the National Olympic authorities and others in the international sports movement.

The Executive Committee will report to the Board of Directors from time to time as may be considered appropriate with respect to the matters set out above.

3.4Operational Committees:

The Operational Committees may include:

Venues and Facilities

Villages

Communications/Media Relations

Visits/Hospitality

Community Relations/Events/Volunteers

Cultural Affairs & Programs

Corporate Relations

Administration

Marketing & Legal Affairs

Education Sectors/Relations

There is allowance for up to 2 elected officials to any one of the committees to ensure geographic and community interest.

4.Work Program & Public Consultation:

4.1 The Work Program:

City Council, at its meeting of March 4, 5, and 6, 1998 directed staff to respond to a number of Council motions which were either adopted or referred to the CAO. The Council motions related to such matters as affordable housing, the conduct of a social impact assessment and financial issues related to the bid. Staff have developed a work program to respond to these motions. A summary of this program and a schedule is included as Appendix 2.

4.2Public Consultation Overview:

City Council, in approving in principle that the City of Toronto bid to host the 2008 Olympic Games, passed a number of motions which relate to the need to seek public consultation in the development of the bid. This section responds to those motions and outlines a public consultation process which would inform the general public interested in the bid, and would involve assistance from those with expertise in 6 key areas related to the development of the bid. As well, the consultation with and assistance from those who are directly impacted by the Olympic venues and legacies will be critical.

Central to preparing a bid to host the Olympics are:

(i)the development of a comprehensive and inclusive set of guiding principles of a bid which is socially responsible; environmentally friendly; financially sound; and provides for public participation; and ensures optimum legacies for the City; and

(ii)the creation of a Bid Book which summarizes a unique vision for hosting the Games and which would be used as the centrepiece for advancement of the bid internationally.

Developing the guiding Olympic Principles is an important first step which will inform the development of the draft bid book. Both the Olympic Principles and the bid book would remain as drafts throughout the process and would be revised as work proceeds. While City Council will make the final decision on the content of the Olympic Principles, and provide input into the bid book, it is proposed that these decisions be made following significant and meaningful public consultation.

The overall goal of the public consultation process should have three objectives:

(i)Provide the public with an opportunity to express their views on what they want the Olympics to do for the citizens of Toronto and our city;

(ii)Provide the public with access to and opportunities to participate in the Olympic planning; and

(iii)Provide the citizens of Toronto with a public consultation process that receives input, incorporates new ideas, responds to concerns, educates the public, and builds support for the bid.

It is proposed that three phases of public consultation should be undertaken, separate and apart from what it is anticipated the IOC will require as part of its evaluation process.

First Phase:

Broad launch of the consultation process and the development of Olympic Principles to guide the preparation of the bid book. Consultation should be organized around the 6 key areas of interest as expressed by the public and City Council:

Social Equity

Environment

Financial Impact (Costs and Benefits)

Transportation

Venues

Cultural Programming

A report outlining the details of the proposed consultation related to the first phase will be prepared for the July 1998 Community Councils and the consultation will commence in September. A draft set of Olympic Principles will be presented to Council for its endorsement in late 1998 or early 1999.

Second Phase:

Intensive public consultation while detailed studies are being undertaken by City staff and TO-Bid. The second phase consultation process would be modeled on the success or shortcomings of the first phase and could include general information meetings, local constituency meetings, roundtable meetings, stakeholder meetings, issue-specific workshops, presentations to community and business organizations, focus groups, surveys, or questionnaires. This consultation would focus on the draft bid book preparation and would take place between November, 1998 and the summer of 1999, using the Council adopted Olympic Principles as a framework.

Third Phase:

This phase of consultation would consolidate the work done over the previous year. This consultation would involve stakeholders and the community. In this phase the details of the bid would be finalized and the various objectives of the bid would be prioritized.

Launch of the Public Consultation Process:

The first phase of public consultation will begin in July, 1998. It is important that information related to the public consultation process be clearly disseminated to the public and the media so that those interested in hearing about the Olympic Bid or voicing an opinion know when, where and how to participate.

The public consultation process is proposed to be launched at the Community Councils. Further information will be available at the Community Council meetings to be held in July. Special meetings of the Community Councils will be held in September, where the public will be provided opportunities to obtain information about the Olympic bid and speak to their local Community Council. Details of the first phase are outlined in Appendix 3 and a preliminary list of community and interest groups are set out in Appendix 4.

The public consultation process for the first phase will be summarized at the beginning of the process in a brochure format. The brochure will be mailed out to all community groups, the TO-bid mailing list, special interest groups and neighbourhood associations in the waterfront. Newspaper ads will also be published. The published material will contain the full list of Phase I dates, times and locations.

Contact Name:

Joe Halstead, Commissioner, Economic Development, Culture & Tourism,

Telephone: (416)395-6188, Fax (416) 395-0388.

Appendix 1 - Organizational Chart

Appendix 2: Olympic Bid Staff Work Program

(1)Major Tasks

Task/Report Description Due Date / Progress
1. Quarterly progress reports to Council Regular progress reports to Council on:

·status of the competition from other cities

· responding to the concerns of Council

·status of public consultation

October 1, 1998

November 25, 1998

March 1999

June 1999

September 1999

2. Public participation Extensive public consultation process required to:

a) develop Olympic principles

b) provide input into the bid book

ongoing - commencing July 1998,

with first phase (Olympic Principles)

concluding in November

3. Olympic Guiding Principles Framework for Olympic bid book submission November 1998
4. Council endorsement of bid Document to be submitted to IOC outlining Toronto's bid to host the Olympics November 1999

(2)Response to Council Motions

Task/Report Description Due Date / Progress
1. Quarterly reports Report to Council October 1, 1998

November 25, 1998

2. Tripartite Agreement City, TO-Bid & COA to define staff, the relationship, roles and responsibilities of each in bidding for the Games Addressed in agreement before Council on July 8, 1998
3. Financial Strategy TO-Bid develop report which does not impact on the tax rate and this strategy be made available for public consultation A further report forthcoming October 1, 1998 Council

The Bid City Agreement provides for a number of mechanisms for financial accountability.

City & TO-Bid enter into discussions on the development of a suitable financial mechanism between them and provide Council with accountability options to ensure protection for taxpayers and the City
4. Olympic Principles City, TO-Bid and COA develop Olympic Principles to update Olympic Commitment and be subject of broad consultation Develop guiding Olympic Principles in 1998 through public consultation process
5. Transportation TO-Bid enter into discussions with TTC on ways and means of increasing public transit during the Games and minimizing vehicular traffic. Discussions to be extended to include Gardiner Lakeshore Task Force to achieve a transportation plan to support on the Olympic requirements Report to November 25, 1998 Council meeting

Report to be informed by public consultation process commencing in July, 1998 as well as the meetings with transportation operators scheduled to begin in July.

6. Housing & Construction TO-Bid work with all stakeholders in the housing and construction industry to develop options to ensure that the opportunities for long term affordable housing are maximized from the accommodation to be built for the Games. That particular attention to be paid to ensure that all accommodation is constructed to the highest environmental standards possible Report to the October 1, 1998 Council

7. Social Impact Assessment TO-Bid work with social planning agencies and City staff to determine the best method to develop a full social impact assessment process for the Games Report to the October 1, 1998 Council

Initial discussions on this issue have been held with the Social Planning Council.

8. Homeless/Tenant Strategy In consultation with Toronto Advisory Committee on Homeless and Isolated Persons, report on issues and mechanisms to ensure the Games do not negatively impact on the homeless, isolated persons and tenants Report to the October 1, 1998 Council

Report to be informed by public consultation process commencing in July 1998. Initial meeting held with Task Force on the Homeless on May 8, 1998.

A discussion paper on Olympic accommodations and housing has been prepared by BIDCO staff.

9. Social Investment Fund TO-Bid work with social planning agencies to consider the opportunity and viability of establishing a social investment fund from the Games -- to be provided within the context of a financially responsible Games Report to the October 1, 1998 Council

(3)Response to Motions Referred to Chief Administrative Officer (CAO)

Task/Report Description Due Date / Progress
1. Referral to CAO with request for report

(Bernardinetti)

that all motions submitted by Members of Council in regard to the Olympic Bid with the exception of Motion (2) by Councillor Pantalone, and Motion (5) by Councillor Bussin, be referred to the CAO with a request that the concerns raised therein be addressed in future reports in the regard To be set out in Quarterly reports, commencing October 1, 1998

2. Lake Shore light rail

(Bussin)

that the following motion be referred to the TTC for consideration and report thereon to SP & P "that a light rail system along the Lake Shore East Transportation Corridor be included in the infrastructure planning and budget for the 2008 Olympic bid for consideration and approval by City Council Component of report to November 25, 1998 Council

To be discussed at meetings with transportation operators commencing in July 1998.

3. Board of Trade liaison

(Davis)

that the CAO be requested to investigate with the Board of Trade the issue of the City's participation in Toronto 2000 as a means of showcasing the City of Toronto as part of the Olympic bid process Component of report to October 1, 1998 Council

Initial meeting already held with 4 subcommittees of Board of Trade on May 6, 1998.

4. Access for people with disabilities

(Johnston)

that the CAO be requested to submit a report providing more detail on improvements which will be made to present facilities for persons with disabilities, such report to be prepared in conjunction with organizers of the Paralympics which would follow the Games Component of report to October 1, 1998 Council

Meetings to discuss these issues with stakeholders held June 25, 1998.

5. Financial due diligence

(Layton)

that TO-Bid be requested to include in its due diligence process, an arms-length financial check for each stage of the process to obtain the 2008 Olympics Component of report to October 1, 1998 Council
6. Guarantees from other levels of government and private sector

(Miller)

that City Council's final support of the Olympic bid be contingent, in part, upon the provision of satisfactory guarantees by other levels of government, the private sector or otherwise, for the City's liability under Section 40 of the Olympic Charter To be set out in quarterly reports, starting October 1, 1998

The Bid City Legal Agreement sets out provisions about provincial and federal government support.

7. Rent Control

(Walker)

that the 1992 Rent Control Act, Landlord and Tenant Act, and the Rental Housing Protection Act, be reinstated at least for the City of Toronto and preferably for the whole Province until at least the year 2010 To be set out in quarterly reports, starting October 1, 1998

Privatization of Social Housing

(Walker)

that the Federal and Provincial governments suspend all privatization of co-operative apartments and units and other forms of social housing withing the GTA until at least 2010
Unit assessment

(Walker)

that, given the potential for extreme instability in assessment because of redevelopment related to the Olympic Games, Provincial legislation confer upon the City of Toronto a system of Unit Assessment (U.A.) To remain in effect until at least the year 2010.

N.B.Council motions had referred to BIDCO, however, with the creation of the new corporation, the actions will be carried out by TO-Bid staff and therefore referred to as TO-Bid in this work plan and hereafter.

As noted in several instances throughout this work program, meetings with interested parties, agencies, and organizations have already begun. A full outline of meetings held to date will be set out in the October 1, 1998 report to Council.

--------

Appendix 3: Phase I of Public Consultation

Phase 1 of the consultation is designed to get public input into the 2008 Olympic Bid and Draft Olympic Principles.

Launch at Community CouncilsTarget: July & September, 1998

At the July, 1998 meeting of the Community Councils, a report will outline the details (dates, time, location) of the public consultation process over the summer and fall, provide the public with staff contacts, WEB site information, and contain an information brochure on the process. The report will also detail the status of the Olympic bid to date.

At the September, 1998 meeting of the Community Councils, the City of Toronto will invite citizens to attend meetings at their local Civic Centre across Toronto to launch the public consultation process for the 2008 Olympic bid. This will be an opportunity for the public to indicate their area of interest or concern.

Focus Group Meetings Target: late September/early October, 1998

The City of Toronto staff, in consultation with TO-bid will then set up a series of focus group meetings to gather public input into six key areas of the Olympic Principles:

(1)Social Equity;

(2)Environment;

(3)Financial Impact (Costs and Benefits);

(4)Transportation;

(5)Venues; and

(6)Legacies.

The major task of these focus groups will be to develop a series of guiding Olympic Principles related to the 6 key areas, describing a "wish list" of legacies related to each area, and determining priorities for the legacies.

Open HousesTarget: Late October, 1998

The City of Toronto staff, in consultation with TO-bid and the leaders of the public focus groups, will then prepare draft Olympic Principles to guide the development of an Olympic bid and the staging of the Olympic Games. These will be subject of two open houses where the public will be invited to comment on the draft Principles related to:

(1)2008 Olympics and social equity issues;

(2)2008 Olympics and the environment;

(3)2008 Olympics -- the costs and financial returns;

(4)2008 Olympics and transportation;

(5)2008 Olympics -- the venue legacies; and

(6 )2008 Olympics and cultural legacies.

Survey/Feedback:

Over the summer, the public consultation process will be complemented by TO-bid's media partners seeking public opinion on various components of the bid. This will take the form of one of the local newspapers or television station asking the public a question a week related to the Olympics or could be a more formal survey.

Draft Guiding PrinciplesTarget: late 1998 or early 1999

As part of the regularly scheduled reports to Council, staff will target a City Council meeting in late 1998 or early 1999 to report on the results of the public consultation process, the draft Olympic Principles, and the next steps.

--------

Appendix 4: Group Lists

Staff have attempted to put together a list of groups which relate to the 6 key areas of the Olympic Principles. The list is by no means exhaustive and representatives from any group not currently on the list should contact the City's Olympic bid office or TO-bid representatives. It should also be that internal groups will be asked to vet the preliminary list of external contacts for comprehensiveness.

(1)Social Equity:

Joint Citizens Committee on People with Disabilities

Healthy Cities Office

Social Planning Council

Community Service Agencies (neighbourhood centres, daycares, immigrant and settlement centres)

Agencies serving children and youth

Social Justice Network

Child Advocate

Task Force on Community Access

Association of Neighbourhood Centres

Boys and Girls Clubs

Association for Community Living

Hugh McMillan Centre

March of Dimes

CNIB

Public and Separate School Boards

Bread Not Circuses Coalition

Transportation Action Now

Housing:

The Metro Toronto Housing Company Limited

City Housing

CityHome

Homes First

Fair Rental Policy Organization of Ontario

Federation of Metro Tenants Associations

Ontario Non Profit Housing Association

Cooperative Housing Federation of Toronto

University professors (eg.Planning, School of Social Work)

Housing Producers

Advisory Committee On the Homeless

Strategy Committee for People Without Homes

Toronto housing design and construction community (architects, urban designers, Toronto Home builders association)

(2)Environment:

Task Force to Bring Back The Don

Toronto Bay Initiative

South Riverdale Environmental Health Liaison Committee

Friends of the Spit

Citizens for a Safe Environment

Toronto Environmental Alliance

Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

Don Watershed Regeneration Council

Metropolitan Waterfront Coalition

University Faculty (eg. Environmental Studies programmes)

Ontario Hydro

Toronto District Heating Corporation

Green Peace

Pollution Probe

Green Tourism

ICLEI

Energy Efficiency Office of Toronto

Canadian Urban Institute

Howland House

Ecology House

(3)Financial (Costs and Benefits):

The Board of Trade

Ontario Chamber of Commerce

Toronto Construction Association

Canadian Federation of Independent Business

Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnership

Metro Toronto Convention & Visitor Association

Tourism Ontario

CD Howe Institute

The Board of Trade of Metropolitan Toronto

Scarborough Chamber of Commerce

North York Chamber of Commerce

Etobicoke Chamber of Commerce

Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas

Scarborough/North York/York Chinese Association

Toronto Real Estate Board

Canadian Italian Business and Professional Association of Toronto

Urban Development Institute

(4)Transportation:

City Cycling Committee

Task Force On The Gardiner Lakeshore Corridor

TCCA

Centre for Sustainable Transportation

Streetcars for Toronto

Greater Toronto Airports Authority

Ontario Motor Coach Association

Ontario Ministry Of Transportation

Transportation 2000

The Green Transportation Coalition

Canadian Urban Institute

Bikes not Cars

Canadian Urban Transit Association

Pollution Probe

Waterfront Regeneration Trust

ICLEI

Transportation Action Now

This group will be augmented by meetings with transportation operators.

(5)Venues:

Exhibition Place

Ontario Place

Groups to be consulted regarding venues will include community-based recreation groups, community centre boards throughout the city as well as provincial and national sports federations and organizations.

(6)Cultural Programming:

Toronto Arts Council

Public Art Commission and various Municipal Public Art Advisory committees

Arts Foundation of Greater Toronto

Ontario Association of Landscape Architects

Ontario Ministry of Citizenship and Culture

Toronto Society of Architects

Toronto Theatre Alliance

Visual Arts Ontario

Harbourfront Centre

Toronto Theatre Alliance

Ontario Film Development Corporation

Arts Etobicoke

Scarborough Arts Council

Exhibition Place

Ontario Place

Major producing/presenting organizations and festivals (Toronto Symphony, Canadian Opera Company, National Ballet, Canadian Stage Co., Downtown Jazz Festival, Caribbean Cultural Committee)

Commercial producers (Livent, Mirvish)

Major institutions (AGO, ROM)

Major venue operators (Hummingbird, Ford, St. Lawrence, RTH/Massey Hall Corp., Glen Gould Studios)

Experienced festival producers

City LACAC's (including Heritage Toronto)

Architectural Conservancy of Toronto

Town of York Historical Society (and other historical societies with an interest in the Olympic sites)

Friends of Fort York

University of Toronto Faculty of Architecture

Community Heritage Project

In addition to the list above organized around specific issues staff has developed a list of over 40 resident and community Groups, BIA's, issue-specific committees (Friends of the Fort, Friends of the Spit), and coalitions of groups south of Queen Street in the Waterfront which would be consulted as part of the Olympic Bid process. The City will also consult with ethno-cultural and ethno-racial organizations.

--------

The following persons appeared before the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee on June30,1998 in connection with the foregoing matter:

-Mr. Michael Shapcott, on behalf of Bread Not Circuses Coalition

-Ms. Lauri Sue Robertson

-Mr. Gerald Parker, President, Beyond Ability International

-Dr. Helen Lenskyj, OISE (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education)

-Mr. Scott Allardyce, Chair, Board of Directors of Transportation, Action Now Inc.

-Mr. Charles Smedmor, CA, CFE, Managing Director, Charles Smedmor and Associates

-Dr. Maurice Field

(Copies of the communication (June 30, 1998) from Councillor Layton, the communication from Councillor Walker submitting two motions, the submission (June 30, 1998) from Mr. Michael Shapcott, Bread Not Circuses Coalition, the submission (June 30, 1998) from Mr. Stefan Kipfer, the submission from Dr. Helen Lenskyj, the submission (June 30, 1998) from Mr. Charles Smedmor and the submission from Mr. Maurice H. Field have been circulated to all members of Council under separate cover and copies thereof are also on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following report (July 8, 1998) from the Commissioner, Economic Development, Culture & Tourism:

Purpose:

The purpose of this report is to:

(1)report on motions arising from the June 30, 1998 Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee; and

(2)seek endorsement of the members to the Board of Directors to the 2008 Toronto Olympic Bid Corporation (TO-Bid).

Financial Implications:

None arising from this report.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that Council endorse the appointment to the inaugural Board of Directors of the 2008 Olympic Bid Corporation (TO-Bid), those persons named in Part 2 of this report.

Comments:

1.Motions arising from Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee on June 30, 1998

    1. New Sub-Committee of TO-Bid

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommended that a new sub-committee of TO-Bid be set up to address the disability and access issues given that the Paralympics follow the Olympics and that an accessibility assessment be conducted. This recommendation will be forward to the TO-Bid Board for action.

    1. Deputations

There were seven deputants to the Committee.

Mr. Michael Shapcott of Bread Not Circuses addressed the Committee and set out four recommendations:

(i)delay ratification of the Bid City Agreement until after the public consultation process is complete;

(ii)ensure TO-Bid is democratically accountable to the people of Toronto;

(iii)ensure the 2008 Bid is financially accountable to the people of Toronto; and

(iv)ensure the 2008 Bid is socially accountable to the people of Toronto.

As was indicated at the June 30, 1998 Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, it is critical that the City ratify the Bid City Agreement now to ensure the Canadian Olympic Association's (COA) continuing endorsement for Toronto's bid to host the 2008 Olympics.

In his brief, Mr. Shapcott set out a number of principles related to hosting the 2008 Olympics. Staff will ensure Mr. Shapcott is invited to participate in the public consultation process. The public consultation process, which will be initiated in September, will help to ensure that the 2008 Bid is democratically, financially and socially responsible to the people of Toronto. Included in Mr. Shapcott's written submission was a letter addressed to the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism requesting detailed information on the City's spending both to date and projected, as it relates to the 2008 Olympic bid. Staff will gather the information and respond directly to his request.

Three deputants (Ms. Lauri Sue Robertson, Mr. Gerald Parker and Mr. Scott Allardyce) spoke about the need for universal access for the Games - for athletes, for spectators - and wanted the Games to have as a goal universal access. In response, the Committee recommended that a sub-committee of TO-Bid be formed to address the disability and access issues given that the Paralympics follow the Olympics and that an accessibility evaluation be conducted. Staff will also be meeting with representatives of Toronto's transportation operators to ensure that they are clearly informed of the Committee's direction on the issue of universal access.

Dr. Helen Lenskyj addressed the Committee and submitted a brief outlining problems with the process as evidenced with the Sydney, Australia, bid for the 2000 Olympics. In her presentation and accompanying letter, Dr. Lenskyj made several allegations about the Sydney Olympic sites and the process involved in the bid and the development of the venues. In response, in the coming weeks staff will investigate the issues raised and report back as part of the regular reports to Council.

In his presentation to the Committee, Mr. Charles Smedmor critiqued the financial information related to the bid. In response, the committee directed that the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism consult with Mr.Charles Smedmor with respect to his submission entitled "Toronto 2008 - the Olympic Costs and Benefits." A meeting to discuss Mr. Smedor's concerns and provide him with additional information has been set up with City staff and staff from TO-Bid.

Mr. Maurice Field also had questions about financial aspects of the bid and recommended that a financial feasibility study be undertaken. Mr. Field's comments will be discussed when staff meet with Mr. Smedmor. Mr. Field also spoke about his knowledge of the Sydney bid. As with Dr. Lenskyj's comments on Sydney's bid, staff will investigate the issues raised and report back as part of the regular reports to Council. Finally, Mr. Field spoke about support for the Games in Toronto. As set out in my June 24, 1998 report, one of the goals of the City's public consultation process to be launched in September is to build support for the Games. In addition, building public support for the bid will likely be one of TO-Bid Corporation's priorities once it is established. Mr. Field's comments will be forwarded to the TO-Bid Corporation staff for consideration.

Finally, Mr. Stefan Kipfer, on behalf of the Metro Network for Social Justice Steering Committee, submitted a letter to the Committee outlining his concerns. Two of Mr.Kipfer's recommendations relate to deferring ratification of the agreement until after public participation and Provincial and Federal Governments' guarantees are secured. As indicated at the June 30, 1998 Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee meeting, it is critical that the City ratify the Bid City Agreement now to ensure the COA's continuing endorsement for Toronto's bid to host the 2008 Olympics.

Mr. Kipfer also recommends changes to the new Toronto Bid organization and suggested adding a binding attachment to the Bid City Agreement stipulating mechanisms to prevent negative financial, social and environmental effects. Mr.Kipfer's recommendation with respect to the bid organization is different in its approach than that set out in the Bid City Agreement whereby a separate non-profit corporation would be created. Staff continue to recommend the structure for the bid to be set out as in the Bid City Agreement. Mr. Kipfer's comments with respect to negative financial, social and environmental effects will be taken into consideration in the development of the guiding Olympic Principles for the bid.

1.2Councillor Layton's Housing Motion

Councillor Layton offered an innovative idea related to affordable housing in advance of the Games. Staff agree that this idea requires further analysis and will report back on Councillor Layton's detailed pro-forma for how housing could be pre-built.

1.3Amendments to Legal Agreement and Implications of Clause 4(d)(ii)

The Bid City Agreement dated April 17, 1998 will not become binding on the City or the Canadian Olympic Association unless and until it is ratified by City Council in a manner satisfactory to the Canadian Olympic Association (COA) by no later than Council's regular July meeting. This section of the report responds to the suggested amendments to the Bid City Agreement and the request for a report on the implications of Clauses 4(d)(ii) and (iii) of the agreement and the potential liabilities. Because of the deadline in the Agreement this information is being provided directly to Council rather than to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee as had been requested.

It is important that Council recognize at this point in time that if Council is truly supportive of the City moving forward with a bid to host the Olympic games in the year 2008, then the Bid City Agreement dated April 17, 1998 must be ratified in the form in which it was signed by the Mayor and the Canadian Olympic Association. With respect of the three suggested amendments, the City Solicitor's office advises the following:

(i)Replace the requirement for the Audit Chair of TO-Bid to make "periodic reports" to the COA and City on financial matters with "quarterly reports".

Periodic reports can be specifically defined as quarterly reports without amending the Bid City Agreement. Clause 4(b)(vi) requires TO-Bid to provide periodic reports to the City concerning financial, marketing and other matters related to the development of the bid and TO-Bid's responsibilities under this agreement based on instructions prescribed by the City and a requirement for quarterly reports can be made under this provision.

(ii)"City" to mean "Toronto City Council".

For purposes of the agreement, "City" means the municipal corporation and not Toronto City Council. In the context of the responsibilities of the parties under the agreement, it would be improper to define City as Toronto City Council. The agreement contemplates a much broader definition of "City". For example, Clause 4(a)(ii) states that the City has been chosen by COA to join with it in bidding for the organization of the games; it would not be appropriate to substitute "Toronto City Council" for "City" in this or other provisions of the agreement where City clearly refers to the municipal corporation.

(iii)Amend clause (vi) to indicate that City Council may delegate specific approval authorities to the Chief Administrative Officer and that the Chief Administrative Officer submit a list of those defined authorities which are deemed appropriate for delegation from City Council to City Council for approval.

Clause 4(a)(vi) of the Bid City Agreement provides that the Chief Administrative Officer or his designate is authorized by the City to provide any necessary consents or approvals on behalf of the City. However, this provision cannot be read as providing the Chief Administrative Officer with any authority to approve matters that have not already been delegated to him by City Council. Accordingly, in matters beyond the authority which City Council has already delegated to the Chief Administrative Officer, specific Council authority is required. Of note is that the provisions of clause 4(a)(vi) authorizes the Chief Administrative Officer to provide any necessary consents or approvals on behalf of the City but do not authorize the Chief Administrative Officer to make appointments to the Board of Directors of TO-Bid on behalf of the City. Appointments to the Board of Directors by the City under clause 3 of the agreement must be made by City Council.

Clause 4(d)(ii) of the agreement provides as follows:

"Any agreement to be made by COA or TO-Bid which may affect the City or oblige the City in any way shall be subject to the prior written approval of City."

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee requested that the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism report on the implications of this provision and on the issue of liability. This provision allows the City to review any arrangements that might be made by the COA or TO-Bid that could in any way affect or oblige the City and requires prior written approval of the City for such agreements to be entered into. It is intended to be a broad-based provision that would allow the City to prevent the COA or TO-Bid from entering into an agreement that could affect or obligate the City in any way. While specific agreements cannot be foreseen at this time, it is likely that this provision would be used in the context of marketing the City's Olympic bid where agreements could have financial implications or more likely, where agreements could reference on the City's image or reputation. This is one of several provisions in the agreement that allow the City to have a degree of control over the activities of the COA and TO-Bid in relation to the bid itself. Subclause (iii) simply requires the City to make any objection it may have in respect of an agreement proposed to be entered into by the COA or TO-Bid in writing within 21 days of receipt of the agreement for approval and provides that where no written objection is made within that time frame, deems approval.

The Bid City Agreement contains provisions respecting commitments and liabilities concerning the bid as set out in clause 4(b). The Agreement requires the City and TO-Bid to both assume all commitments, liabilities, obligations or undertakings in relation to the bid and indemnify COA against liability, except in the event of unauthorized conduct by COA or where COA has expressly ratified a commitment in writing. The Agreement also requires TO-Bid to assume all such commitments, liabilities, obligations or undertakings in relation to the bid as between the City and TO-Bid. While the agreement discusses the roles of the COA and City, including liability issues, in the event that the bid for the 2008 Olympic Games is successful, it is contemplated that these matters will be dealt with in future agreements, acknowledging that it is impossible to fully assess such matters at this stage. In respect of any potential liability of the City that could arise out of the submission of the bid, the Agreement contains a series of clauses designed to provide the City with the greatest protection possible against liability, most notably the following:

-Clause 3 - by the City appointing two-thirds of the persons to the Board of Directors of TO-Bid, placing strict provisions respecting the adoption of a budget and strategic plan by the Board of Directors of TO-Bid, requiring a member of the Board of TO-Bid to be appointed as Audit Chair and to make periodic reports on financial matters respecting TO-Bid to the City, and requiring the consent of the City to the terms of the articles of incorporation or letters patent of TO-Bid together with the terms of its organizational by-laws, the City exercises a substantial amount of control over the organization and affairs of the corporation;

-Clause 4(b)(iv) - TO-Bid is required to indemnify the City against liability for all losses and expenses of whatsoever nature arising from the bid;

-Clause 4(b)(v) - TO-Bid is specifically restricted from borrowing funds or incurring any overruns, expenses or liabilities in excess of amounts raised or committed to by TO-Bid. By prohibiting TO-Bid from spending more than it can raise, the potential of the City assuming a financial liability is very remote;

-Clauses 3(g) and 4(b)(vi) - the requirement for TO-Bid to appoint and Audit Chair and to report to COA and City concerning financial, marketing and other matters based on instructions prescribed by COA and City allow the City to carefully monitor the bid process and determine any risk exposure at the earliest possible opportunity;

-Clause 4(d)(ii) - requires the City's prior written approval before TO-Bid can enter into any agreement that affects or obliges the City in any way whatsoever;

-Clause 4(k) - the City Auditor is given the right to inspect the books and records of TO-Bid at any time for the purpose of assuring that it has not breached clause 4(b)(v) referred to above.

2.Toronto Olympic Bid Corporation

2.1Board of Directors

Hundreds of suggested names were brought forward as possible candidates for the Board of Directors for the 2008 Toronto Olympic Bid Corporation (TO-Bid). A consensus Board has been reached by the City, the Canadian Olympic Association (COA) and David Crombie in consultation with the Provincial and Federal Governments. As set out in the June 24, 1998 report to the June 30, 1998 Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, the Bid City Agreement provides that the Board of Directors of TO-Bid be appointed by the City (two-thirds) and the COA (one-third).

Appointments to the inaugural Board of Directors to the 2008 Olympic Bid Corporation are as follows:

Honourary Patrons

Colonel The Honourable Henry (Hal) Jackman, C.M., K.St.J., LL.D. served as Lieutenant Governor of Ontario 1991-97. He is the Chair or Director of numerous corporate Boards, and also serves on an extensive number of charitable boards. He is currently the Chancellor of the University of Toronto.

Colonel The Honourable Lincoln M. Alexander, P.C.,C.C., K.St.J., O.Ont., C.D.,Q.C. has had an extensive career in public service, serving as Lieutenant Governor of Ontario (1985-91), Federal Minister of Labour, Chair of Ontario's Workers Compensation Board, Chair of Canadian Race Relations Foundation and currently, as Chancellor of Guelph University. He is a Director of various public companies and as well, serves as a patron or honourary officer of several charitable organizations.
The Honourable William G. Davis, P.C., C.C., Q.C. had an extensive career in public service as a member of the Ontario legislature from 1959 to 1985. He was Premier from 1971 until 1985. Subsequently, he became Counsel to Tory Tory DesLauriers & Binnington and Director of numerous corporate boards. Mr. Davis has been awarded Honourary Degrees by eight Ontario Universities as well as the Yeshiva University of New York, the National University of Ireland and the University of Tel Aviv.
The Honourable David Peterson, P.C.,Q.C.,C.St.J.,D.U.,L.L.D., is a senior partner with Cassels Brock & Blackwell where he practices corporate/commercial law as well as international trade law. Mr. Peterson is Founding Chair of the Toronto Raptors Basketball and Director of a number of corporate boards. He was first elected to the Ontario Legislature in 1975, and served as Premier from 1985-90.
The Honourable Bob Rae Q.C., P.C. served as Premier of Ontario from 1990 to 1995 and was elected eight times to federal and provincial parliaments before retirement from politics. He is currently a partner with Goodman Phillips & Vineberg. Mr. Rae is the author of numerous articles on different aspects of the law and has also authored two books. He is a spokesperson for a number of health related organizations. He is also a Director for a number of corporate boards.
The Honourable Roy McMurtry is currently the Chief Justice of Ontario. Among his many previous positions in the public service, he was Ontario Attorney General (1975-85) as well as Solicitor General (1978-82). In recognition of his public service, Mr. McMurtry has been awarded honourary doctorates by the Toronto, Ottawa, Leeds, and York University, and the Law Society of Upper Canada. Mr. McMurtry is presently the Chair of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Committee on Co-operation through Sport and the Honourary President of the Commonwealth Games Association of Canada.

Board of Directors

Honourary Chair, His Worship, Mayor Mel Lastman

Catherine Barbaro practices corporate commercial law in Toronto. She is very involved in a variety of community organizations, having served on the board of the United Way, Northwestern General Hospital and the Italian Canadian Benevolent Corporation. Currently, she serves on the Boards of the Columbus Centre and the Humber River Regional Hospital.

Paul Beeston became the first employee of the Toronto Blue Jays in 1976. He eventually became the Chief Executive Officer in 1991, and as CEO saw the Blue Jays through their two consecutive World Series victories (1992, 1993). Currently, he is President of Major League Baseball.
Robert Bettauer is the President of the National Sports Centre for Toronto and three time Canadian tennis champion. He was head coach and Team Leader for tennis at the 1988 Seoul Olympic Games and 1992 Barcelona Olympic Games. Over the past decade, Robert has been the Director of Player Development and the Director of Sport Development for Tennis Canada.
John Bitove Jr. is Governor of the Canadian Olympic Foundation and was the President and Founder of the Toronto Raptors and the Air Canada Centre. He was instrumental in bringing the 1993 World Indoor Games in Athletics (Track and Field) and the 1994 World Championships in Basketball to the City of Toronto. John was also on the Advisory Board of Toronto's bid to host the 1996 Olympic Games and the Board of Directors of Toronto's bid for Expo 2000.
Rick Brant is the Executive Director of the Aboriginal Sport Circle. Among his many sport experiences, he has been the General Manager of the 1993 North American Indigenous Games in Prince Alberta and the 1997 Games in Victoria. He was a member of the National Track and Field Team from 1986-1988.
Cecelia Carter-Smith teaches at the Hillfield-Strathallan College in Hamilton and is Vice President Media: International Children's Festival 2000. She is a recipient of McMaster University's A Friend of Distinction Award for dedication to sport, university athletics, and the pursuit of excellence and was recognized as Woman of the Year by the City of Hamilton for her contributions to health, fitness and sport.
John Cartwright is the Business Manager of the Construction Trades Council, representing a diverse membership of over 40,000 tradesmen and women in the Greater Toronto area. A resident of Toronto, he assisted in Toronto's bid for Expo 1998.
Diane Chabot is the owner of DCM Enterprises, a strategic management consulting firm. As a former executive with Bell Canada and Northern Telecom in addition to the Ontario Film Development Corporation, Diane developed extensive experience in international relations. She has been involved with Toronto's 2008 Olympic Bid as a volunteer since its inception.
Mary Anne Chambers is Vice-President, Corporate and Commercial Services, Scotiabank . Ms. Chambers is the Chair of the Canadian Club, Vice-Chair of the Governing Council of the University of Toronto and she currently sits as a member of the Board of Directors, United Way of Canada - Centraide Canada and as a member of the Board of Trustees, United Way of Greater Toronto. Ms. Chambers is the 1997 recipient of the African Canadian Achievement Award "for achievement in business" and of the 1998 Certificate of Excellence "for outstanding contribution in the promotion of Race Relations".

__________________________

Michael Chambers is a partner in the Ottawa law firm, Maclaren Corlett and is a member of the Legal Affairs Committee of the Canadian Olympic Association. Mr. Chambers has a long history of involvement in the volunteer administrative side of sport as; President of the Canadian Canoe Association, Vice President and member of the Executive Committee of the Canadian Olympic Association and as Chef de Mission at the 1996 Olympic Games in Atlanta. He currently sits on the Board of Directors of the 1999 Winnipeg Pan American Games Organizing Committee.
Paul Clifford is President-Administrator: Hotel Employees Restaurant Employees Union and International Organizer: Hotel Employees Restaurant Employees International Union. A graduate of Urban Studies, Yale University, Mr. Clifford has been the Co-chair of the Canadian Tourism Human Resource Council and been active in supporting Mayworks - Toronto's festival of arts and working people. He currently sits on the Board of Governors of George Brown College.

_

Renn Crichlow is Vice-Chairman of The Canadian Olympic Association's Athletes' Council and is a Director of the Canadian Olympic Association. He is a three time Olympian having competed in the 1988, 1992 and 1996 Olympic Games in canoeing. Renn is currently enrolled in Medical School at Harvard University where he will receive his MD in 1999.
The Honourable David Crombie is Chair of Toronto 2008 Olympic Bid Corporation and Chair of the Waterfront Regeneration Trust. A lifelong resident of Toronto, he was elected to Toronto City Council in 1969 and served as Mayor from 1972- 1978 when he was elected to The House of Commons as Member for Rosedale. He served as Minister of National Health and Welfare and as Minister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development, and Secretary of State for Canada.
Rupert Duchesne is the Vice President of Marketing for Air Canada. Prior to joining for Air Canada, he was Vice-President of Mercer Management Consulting and head of the world-wide aviation practice based first in London, England and subsequently in Toronto.
William Duron joined Toronto Life Magazine as Publisher following his eighteen year position as President of the Metropolitan Toronto Convention and Visitors Association (now Tourism Toronto). Bill has been involved in hundreds of international convention, congress and tradeshow wins for Toronto and was extensively involved in Toronto's 1996 Olympic bid.
Senator Trevor Eyton, O.C., Q.C. is a member of the Canadian Senate and is the Senior Group Chairman of EdperBrascan Corporation. He is a governor of the Canadian Olympic Foundation and the Junior Achievement of Canada. In 1996 he was appointed an Officer of the Order of Canada.
Robert J. Foster is the President and Founder of Capital Canada Limited, an independent investment banking group and is one of Canada's leading sports and entertainment investment bankers. He has made direct contributions to the cultural, sporting and political life of Toronto as a board member or chair of many organizations.
James A. Ginou is Chairman and CEO of Art Printing of Toronto. Currently Mr. Ginou is Chairman of Ontario Place Corporation. Since 1961 he has been actively involved in all aspects of the tourism and hospitality industry as a member of the Canadian Restaurant and Food Services Association, the Ontario Restaurant Association and the Niagara Falls Visitor and Convention Bureau. He has been active in a number of charitable organizations as a Co-Chairman of Fundraising for Junior Achievement of Toronto and Co-Chairman of Fundraising for Diabetes Canada.
Paul Godfrey is President and Chief Executive Officer of the Sun Media Corporation and was Chairman of the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for 11 years. He is involved with numerous boards and many charities including; the University of Toronto - Governing Council, the Hospital for Sick Children's Herbie Fund and as Chairman of the Canadian Newspaper Association, Board of Governors and the Molson Indy Board of Trustees.
Anne Golden has been the President of the United Way of Greater Toronto since December 1987. In 1995 she was appointed by the Premier of Ontario as the Chair of the Greater Toronto Area Task Force. In January 1996 she submitted a report to the government outlining recommendations for the future direction of the Greater Toronto Area. In January 1998 Ms. Golden was appointed by the Mayor of Toronto to chair the Homeless Action Task Force. She currently serves on the Governing Council of the University of Toronto and the Advisory Board of York University's Non Profit and Management Leadership Program.
Senator Jerry Grafstein, Q.C. practices corporate and communications law in Toronto as well as serving in the Senate. He has a broad knowledge of all aspects of media including television, cable telecommunications and publishing. Senator Grafstein serves on a number of Boards of Directors including the Canadian Opera Company, Shaw and Stratford Festivals.
Ruth Grant has been employed by the Canadian Centre for Philanthropy directing a study on charitable board governance and by the Department of The Secretary of State for Canada responsible for Womens Issues, Multiculturalism. Ms. Grant holds directorships with numerous organizations including; the Hospital for Sick Children, Terry Fox Hall of Fame, United Way of Greater Toronto and Aetna Health Management. She received the Canada 125 Commemorative Medal for service to the community.
George Gross is a long-time Toronto journalist and has worked at the Toronto Sun since 1971. He is active internationally as the Vice-President of the International Sports Press Association. In recognition of his accomplishments he was the first Canadian journalist to receive the Olympic Order from the International Olympic Committee. His international athletic career included soccer, basketball, tennis, waterpolo and table tennis.
Sam Hahn is a research pharmacist for drug regulatory and quality control working currently as a consultant with Stellar International Inc. and is a member of the Canadian Pharmaceutical Association. He was the founder of the Korean-Canadian Council for the Seoul Olympic Games. Mr. Hahn is a Governor of the Canadian Olympic Foundation and was the former president of the Korean Canadian Cultural Association of Metro Toronto.
Joe Halstead was appointed the new City of Toronto's Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture & Tourism following a 25 year career in the Ontario Public service including a posting as the Assistant Deputy Minister of Culture, Tourism and Recreation. His department is also responsible for the City's recreation, parks and special events programs. Mr. Halstead is the City's lead on the bid for the 2008 Olympic Games.
Doug Hamilton practices law in Toronto. He was a member of Canada's national rowing team and won a gold medal at the 1985 World Rowing Championships and is a bronze medallist from the 1994 Olympic Games in Los Angeles. He is currently a Director of the Canadian Olympic Association and a member of the C.O.A. Team Selection Committee.
Odette Heung was closely involved with the founding of the first political party in Hong Kong-the United Democrats-which is the predecessor of the Hong Kong Democratic Party. She was also involved in drafting the Hong Kong Basic Law which is the mini-constitution governing the Chinese Special Administrative Region. Since immigrating to Canada six years ago, Ms. Heung has been active in community fundraising projects.
Marion Ho is the Director of the Chinese Cultural Centre for the Greater Toronto and Chair of Special Events and Programs. Ms. Ho has worked tirelessly to organize multicultural programs, as well as community and volunteer outreach. She is Head of the Science Department at Loretto Abbey High School.
Steven Hudson is the CEO of Newcourt, a corporate and commercial finance company. In addition, he is active involved in many boards, including AGRA Inc., Altamira Management, the Royal Ontario Museum Foundation and the St. Joseph's Health Centre Foundation. He is also Chair of the Board of Directors of the Toronto Community Foundation.
Frederick T. Kasravi is presently the Chairman of the Ontario Business Development Corporation and an agent for the ITT Hartford Insurance Company of Canada. In 1991 he received the Citation for Citizenship Award from the Federal government. He has held a variety of positions in local non-profit and charitable organizations.
Bruce Kidd is the Dean of the Faculty of Physical Education & Health at the University of Toronto. He has been involved in the Olympics as an athlete, journalist and social scientist. He has written extensively on the history and political economy of Olympics and Canadian sport.
Molly Killingbeck has been a track coach since retiring as a successful member of various national relay teams and is currently the Head Coach of Track & Field at York University. She was also the coach of the gold medal men's 4 x100 metres relay team in Atlanta (1996). Ms. Killingbeck is also Chair, National Women's Sprint Development, Athletics Canada.
Dale Lastman is Co-Chair of the firm, Goodman Phillips & Vineberg and practices corporate/commercial and securities law in Toronto. He holds a variety of directorships, including: member of the Board of Governors of Mount Sinai Hospital, York University and the Young People's Theatre.
Doris Lau is presently a Vice President and a Director of Nesbitt Burns Inc. She is a Federal Court Citizenship Judge. Ms. Lau is a member of the University of Toronto's fundraising Executive Committee and Vice-Chairman of the University of Toronto Faculty of Music Fundraising Team. She is the Honorary Chairman for the Canada Day's Canada Unity Parade in Toronto on July 1, 1998. In June 1998 she received the "Prominent Canadian" award from the Province of Ontario for her "outstanding commitment and dedication to fostering the values of multiculturalism, supporting charitable causes, and excellence in their profession."
Delores Lawrence is the President and CEO of NHI Nursing and Homemakers Inc. She is currently the Chairperson of the African Canadian Society on Health Care and the President of the African Canadian Entrepreneurs. In 1997 Ms. Lawrence participated in the Representation of First Women Trade Mission to the U.S.A.
Ralph Lean, Q.C. practices law and is a partner in a Toronto law firm. Mr. Lean is currently a director of the Second City Company Inc., the World Film Festival of Toronto Inc. and Atomic Energy of Canada Limited. He is a past Governor and Chairman of the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place.
Carol Anne Letheren a teacher at both the University of Toronto (1964-1971 and York University (1971-1978) and a strategic management and marketing consultant (1978-1994) Carol Anne is currently the Chief Executive Officer of the Canadian Olympic Association. Carol Anne has been involved in amateur and Olympic sport since 1963. She was Chef de Mission of Canada's 1988 Olympic Team, President of the Canadian Olympic Association (1990-1994) and is one of the two IOC members in Canada since 1990. Carol Anne has served on numerous volunteer boards in education, culture and sport. She served on the Site Evaluation Commission for the 2004 Olympic Games and is currently a member of the 2002 Olympic Winter Games Coordinating Commission for the Salt Lake City Games.
Michelle Levy is the National Projects Chair of the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation. In this capacity she is involved with fundraising, sponsorship, special events and volunteer recognition efforts of the Foundation. Ms. Levy is one of the founding members of the Run for the Cure - supporting the cause of finding a cure for breast cancer.
Sandra Levy practices law in the City of Toronto. She has represented Canada on the National Women's Field Hockey Team for eleven years and in the 1988 and 1992 Olympic Games, and the Pan American Games in 1987 and 1991. She has extensive experience in athlete advocacy and volunteer sport administration through her work with the Canadian Olympic Association and other sporting affiliations.
Bahadur Madhani is President of Equiprop Management Ltd. which specializes in real estate and property management. He has served in many senior voluntary positions in the Aga Khan Ismaili community in Toronto. Having been on the Board of the United Way of Greater Toronto since 1991, Mr. Madhani has been Chair of the Board since 1996.
Patricia Murray has had an extensive sport career for over 25 years at the international, national and provincial levels. She is the former president of Synchro Canada and the Aquatic Federation of Canada, and a member of a Canadian team at four Olympic Games (1984, 1988, 1992, 1996). Pat is currently the Director of Sport and Recreation at York University.
Richard Pound, Q.C. has been a member of the International Olympic Committee since 1978 and a member of the IOC's Executive Board since 1983. An Olympic swimming finalist and Commonwealth Games gold medallist, Mr. Pound became a member of the COA in the early 1960s and served as its secretary from 1968 to 1977 and as President from 1977 to 1982. He currently chairs the IOC's Marketing Commission. Widely regarded as one of the most influential individuals in international sport, Mr. Pound is senior partner with Stikeman Elliott (Montreal) and the author of Five Rings Over Korea.
Franco Prevedello is President of Prevedello International Wines and Spirits, and a Toronto restauranteur. He is a Board member of George Brown College and the Stratford Chef School. Mr. Prevedello provided consulting services on the design and construction of the Ontario Pavilion and managed the restaurant during Expo '86. He has a recognized record of accomplishments within the Toronto hospitality industry.
Aaron Regent is President and Chief Executive Officer, Trilon Securities Corporation and Senior Vice President, Corporate Development, EdperBrascan Limited. Mr. Regent is a marathon runner competing in the 1997 Canadian International Marathon and is a fundraiser for Princess Margaret Hospital, the Terry Fox Run and the Shaw Festival.
Rocco Rossi is the Vice President, Strategic Planning and New Media at the Toronto Star. He is a member of a variety of professional and volunteer organizations including the Canadian Newspaper Association, Canadian Press, and the Internet Advertising Bureau of Canada.
John Sheridan is Executive Vice President of Bell Canada and President, Ontario. His position includes company-wide responsibility for Bell's marketing operation in Canada. Mr. Sheridan sits on numerous boards including; Sun Media Corporation, Ryerson Polytechnic University, the Board of Trade. He also chairs the Board of Stentor Resource Centre Inc.
Walter Sieber has been a Board member of the Canadian Olympic Association since 1972 and a member of the Executive Committee from 1984 to today. A native Quebecer, Walter worked on the Organizing Committee for the 1976 Olympic Games in Montreal. He was a Director on the Calgary 1988 Olympic Winter Games Board, and Vice President of the Bid Committee for Quebec 2002.
Allan Slaight is President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Standard Broadcasting Corporation Limited. He is the Chairman of Urban Outdoor Advertising. Mr. Slaight has a long and distinguished career in the Canadian broadcasting industry. He has served as a Trustee to Women's College Hospital and as a Director of the United Way of Greater Toronto.
Cecil Smith is Executive Director of the Ontario Track and Field Association and has attended every Olympic Games except one since 1972 and sits on the International Amateur Athletic Federation Technical Committee. He is the author of numerous policies and procedures manuals and technical handbooks on track and field.
Irene So is currently the Vice President and Associate Portfolio Manager of RBC Dominion Securities, where she chairs the Asian Advisory Council. Ms. So is actively involved in many community organizations including the Cancer Society, North York Region; Centenary Hospital, Chinese Outreach Committee; and Director and Vice President of the Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto.
Peter Soumalias is the President of Symas Corporation. His current affiliations include Founder of "Canada's Walk of Fame", Co-Founder and Chair Elect of the Toronto Entertainment District Association and Co-Founder and Vice-Chair of the Hellenic Heritage Foundation. Mr. Soumalias presently participates on a number of fundraising committees for local hospitals and children's charities.
Belinda Stronach has been a Vice President of Magna International Inc. and in 1997 she also became the President of Misura Inc. In addition to her business activities she has worked in the non-profit sector in various capacities. Since 1995, she has been President of the Fair Enterprise Institute.
Connie Sugiyama is the Director of the Securities and Public Transactions Group with the law firm of Fasken Campbell Godfrey. Her community involvement includes Director, Trillium Foundation; Director, Hummingbird Centre and Special Advisor to the Japanese Canadian Cultural Center.
Veronica Tennant was Prima Ballerina with the National Ballet of Canada for 25 years. She continues to be involved in performance in theater, film and television as director, producer, actor and narrator. Ms. Tennant has received several awards, including the Toronto Arts Awards, and City of Toronto's Award of Merit. She is an Officer of the Order of Canada.
Ajay K. Virmani is the Chairman and CEO of Commercial Transport International (Canada) Ltd. and Fastair Cargo Systems Ltd. He was a participant in the Team Canada Missions overseas, led by the Prime Minister in 1995 and 1996. Mr. Vimani has experienced in the international marketplace. He obtained his Masters Degree in Business Administration in 1985.
Brian Wakelin is currently the Vice-President of the Canadian Olympic Association and a past Chairman of the Board of the Canadian Hockey Association. He was Assistant Chef de Mission - Calgary, 1988; Head of Delegation, Hockey - Albertville, 1992; and Co-ordinator, Canada Olympic House - Lillehammer, 1994; Assistant Director, Canada Olympic House - Atlanta, 1996 and Chef de Mission - Nagano, 1998.
Bill Warren was involved in the successful bid by the City of Calgary to host the 1988 Olympic Winter Games. He served as Legal Council for the Organizing Committee for those Olympics. Currently he is the President of the Canadian Olympic Association. He is also a senior partner with the Calgary law firm Warren Tettensor.
Gary Waxman is the Executive Vice President of I. Waxman & Sons Ltd. Educated at McMaster University, he has been actively involved in fundraising for the Hamilton Civic Hospitals, the J.C.C. Development Campaign and the Hamilton and Toronto Sick Kids Foundation, among others.
Dr. Joseph Wong is a family physician in downtown Toronto. He has done pioneering work in and beyond the Chinese community in Canada. Since 1979 Dr. Wong has assisted in raising funds for refugee relief, medical research, social services and geriatric care facilities for the Canadian Red Cross and for flood relief in China. He served as Chairman of the Board of the United Way of Greater Toronto from 1990 to 1992. Dr. Wong is involved in many national charitable and non-profit organizations. In 1993 he was awarded the Order of Canada.
John Wood is Chairman of the Canadian Olympic Foundation. Mr. Wood's Olympic experience includes competition as an athlete in the Olympic Games held in Mexico (1968), in Munich (1972), and in Montreal (1976) where he won a silver medal in canoeing. Currently, he is Chief Executive of Financial Concept Group Ltd, the financial planning division of Midland Walwyn Inc., and is Chairman of the Canadian Olympic Foundation.

James Worrall, O.C., Q.C., Olympic competitor Berlin 1936, Team leader of Canadian Teams in 4 Olympic Games; Past President of COA; member of IOC 1967-1989; IOC Executive Board 1974-1978; Honourary Life President of COA; Honourary Member IOC; Member Organizing Committees (Montreal 1970-1976, Calgary 1981-1988): closely involved in all Canadian bids for Olympic Games, Olympic Winter Games and Pan American Games; IOC Evaluation Commission for 1988 Olympics; Officer Order of Canada; IOC Olympic Order, Canadian Olympic Order in Gold; Gold Medal - City of Toronto and other decorations; member Canada Sports Hall of Fame, etc.

Contact Name:

Joe Halstead, Commissioner

Economic Development, Culture & Tourism

Telephone:(416) 395-6188

Fax(416) 395-0388)

(City Council also had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following communication (June 25, 1998) from Councillor Jack Layton, Don River:

Dear Colleagues,

Professor David Hulchanski has asked me to forward this communication to you. It raises concerns about the experience in Sydney with regard to housing issues.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that the attached communication be referred to all parties concerned with the Olympic Bid Agreement and that a comprehensive housing strategy be developed as a part of the next stage of the development of the bid, taking into account the issues emerging in Sydney. This strategy should be developed in conjunction with a broad range of stakeholders in the housing sector.)

(A copy of the communication (June 24, 1998) from Mr. David Hulchanski, Professor of Housing and Community Development, University of Toronto, which was appended to the foregoing communication, is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

(City Council also had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, communications from the following individuals regarding the City of Toronto's bid for the 2008 Summer Olympics:

(i)(July7, 1998) from Mr. C. Smedmor, Charles Smedmor and Associates, Litigation and Forensic Accountants;

(ii)(June 30, 1998) from Mr. Michael Shapcott, Bread Not Circuses Coalition; and

(iii)(undated) from Ms. Lauri S. Robertson, HANDIDACTIS Inc.)

(Mayor Lastman, at the meeting of City Council on July 8, 9, and 10, 1998, declared his interest in those portions of the foregoing Clause pertaining to the appointment of the inaugural Board of Directors of the 2008 Olympic Bid Corporation (TO-Bid) in that his son is one of the nominees.)

28

Recreation Grants Program - 1998 Allocations and Appeals

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted the following recommendations:

"It is recommended that:

(1)the recommendations of the Municipal Grants Committee embodied in the transmittal letter dated June 11, 1998, from the City Clerk, be adopted; and

(2)consideration of the recommendations of the Municipal Grants Committee embodied in the transmittal letter dated July 9, 1998, from the City Clerk, entitled 'Recreation Grants Program - Weston Minor Hockey League and Christie-Ossington Neighbourhood Centre', be deferred to the next regular meeting of City Council to be held on July 29, 1998.")

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the transmittal letter (June 11, 1998) from the Municipal Grants Review Committee to Council without recommendation.

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having:

(1)requested the Municipal Grants Review Committee to reconsider a grant of $6,000.00 to the Christie Neighbourhood Centre and to clarify where "duplication of services" exists in that neighbourhood and report to Council on July 8, 1998 at the time the Recreation Grants Program is considered; and

(2)referred the communication (June 18, 1998) from Ms. Elain Daviau of the Beach Arts Centre to the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for a report on the tax status of the property.

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on June 11, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the attached reports (May 13 and June5,1998) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism respecting the Recreation Grants Program - 1998 Allocations and Appeals.

The Municipal Grants Review Committee reports, for the information of the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, having requested Councillor Lindsay Luby, Chair, and appropriate staff, to meet with the Board of Management of the Weston Lion's Arena to discuss the issue of the ice rental fees being charged for use by the Weston Minor Hockey League (Grant No. 89), and the possibility of in-kind support, etc., and report thereon directly to Council for its meeting on July 8, 1998.

Councillor Frances Nunziata, York-Humber, appeared before the Municipal Grants Review Committee with respect to the Grant request from the Weston Minor Hockey League (Grant No. 89).

--------

(Report dated May 13, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee from the

Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism)

Purpose:

This report presents the recommended allocations for 95 agencies which have applied for municipal financial support under the Recreation Grants Program.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

The 1998 approved estimates are $1,126,989.00 for all Recreation Grants Programs, which are sufficient funds for the program provided there is a $25,000.00 reallocation from the Major Recreation Grants to offset the 1998 shortfall in the Minor Recreation Grants.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the attached 1998 Recreation Grants Program allocations totalling $363,970.00 for 88 agencies, described in Appendix A and B, be approved;

(2)$56,649.00 be transferred from the Recreation Grants Account to the Parks and Recreation Operating Budget to maintain services offered to seniors and sports groups in the former City of York as has been done annually; and

(3)the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

Under the general authority for making municipal grants provided in Section 113 (1) of the Municipal Act, all of the former municipalities, except Metro, provided support to the not-for-profit sector through recreation grants. The Recreation Grants Program, represents a combination of four existing grants programs offered by four former municipalities (Etobicoke, North York, Toronto and York) as the primary means of municipal support for community-based recreation/sports agencies. The former City of Scarborough funded all not-for-profit agencies through its Community Services Grants program regardless of category; so its 1998 recreation grants are dealt with in the Community Services report. The former Borough of East York traditionally awarded a recreation grant to the East York Symphony. For 1998, it was deemed more appropriate that this organization apply for a grant through the Culture Office.

All Recreation Grant Programs existed to enable the former municipalities to support policies which assisted the community and the provision of their services. Although they may look very different, they do have many commonalities. Some former municipalities made additional funding available outside the regular grants review cycle, to organizations in need of urgent assistance as a result of unforeseen circumstances. These one-time emergency funds were provided using either unallocated recreation grants funds or emergency funds. Such emergency funding has not been included in the 1998 Recreation Grants Program as outlined in the January 2, 1998, report to Council.

Comment and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

1998 Budget:

The total amount approved in the 1998 Recreation Grants Program is $1,126,989.00 which is flatlined at the 1997 funding levels of the combined programs. The amalgamated budgets of the following programs form the 1998 Recreation Grants Budget: Etobicoke Athletics Category, North York Community Recreation Grants, Toronto Major and Minor Recreation Grants, and York Community Sports Grants.

The former City of York provided $56,649.00 within the grants budget to pay for caretakers and other hard costs associated with the delivery of service to seniors and sports groups offering recreational programs at City-owned facilities. These costs, referred to as in-kind grants to these agencies, are included in the Recreation Grants Budget and should be transferred to the Parks and Recreation Operating Budget in order that these services be maintained.

The former City of Toronto provided Major Recreation Grants to 15 local organizations that offer significant recreational programs and lawn bowling programs within the City. The amount allocated in the 1998 Major Recreation Budget is $724,393.00. Not included in the Recreation Grants Budget but listed in the line item grants under Board of Education Shared Use, is $151,892.00 which the former City of Toronto pays to the Toronto District School Board. This is for Summer Swim, a jointly funded instructional swimming, at Board facilities used primarily by day camps and day care centres. The other funded program is 8 Point Criteria operated in major Board facilities and the grant from the City covers the weekend use by recreational and educational groups. These grants are considered sustaining grants and do not go through the regular grants process and review. Given that some project grants were not annualized and a $11,823.00 transfer from the Toronto General Grants to the Toronto Minor Recreation Grants in 1997 was not available, there were not enough funds to meet the needs of returning and deserving new applicants. It was necessary to realign the funds awarded in the Minor and Major Recreation Categories within the former City of Toronto. For 1998, the 15 agencies funded in the Major Recreation Grants category and the Lawn Bowling Programs, see Appendix C, will receive $699,393.00, a reduction of $25,000.00 and these funds are allocated in the Minor Recreation Grants category. Once the in-kind grants and the Major Recreation Grants have been accounted for under the 1998 Recreation appropriation, a total of $370,947.00 remains for distribution.

Application and Assessment Process:

Overall, 95 agencies requested $632,154.00 under the 1998 Recreation Grants Program. This includes 79 previously funded agencies and 16 new agencies that applied to the four different programs. Some agencies funded in 1997 did not reapply for 1998 funding.

In 1998, a common application package was used for applicants in the Recreation Grants Program. Grant applications previously issued for 1998 funding by the former municipality of North York, due to an earlier deadline, were deemed to be 1998 applications to the new City of Toronto. In some cases, agencies were required to submit additional information after a review of their original submission. The existing criteria of the former municipalities were used to assess applications. Applicants eligible for funding in 1997 continued to be eligible in 1998.

The assessment/review process was streamlined somewhat this year to facilitate the development of a municipal grants policy for implementation in 1999. A team of grants staff assessed applications using existing criteria and information provided in the application form. Review processes used in the 1997 cycle were duplicated for the most part in 1998. Each applicant was assigned a staff liaison. Those former municipalities that used panels and/or advisors and/or conducted interviews did so again. A common list of documentation containing essential accountability information, was required from each agency for the Recreation Grants Program such as minutes approving the application, Board of Directors with their home addresses, and financial and/or audit statements. New applicants were assessed to determine eligibility, their capacity to deliver the proposed programs and to ensure that they were not duplicating services already provided in the area.

Allocation Recommendations:

Appendix A provides a listing of the recommendations for funding in 1998. Appendix B offers a summary of services provided by each agency. Of the 95 applicants, 88 have been recommended for a total of 363,970.00.

The general approach in 1998 was to flatline allocations at the 1997 levels to agencies that received ongoing support as indicated in the report titled "Administration of Municipal Grants Programs" approved by Council in February 1998. Grants would be reduced if there were performance issues and increased if based on exceptional need or circumstances. For new applicants, the principles of equitable access to grants, community needs and available resources were considered in developing recommendations. Of 79 returning applications, 77 groups were flatlined, three organizations were awarded small increases, two based on increased participation targets identified in the 1997 process, and one based on the increased costs of a move.

1998 Allocations SummaryNumber of Agencies

Flatline recommended76

Increase recommended 3

Reduction recommended 0

Ineligible 3

New applicants recommended 9

New Applicants:

Seventeen organizations that did not receive Recreation Grants in 1997 from any former municipal grants program applied for support in 1998. One new applicant withdrew early in the process. Of the remaining 15 new applicants, nine are recommended for allocations in 1998, three have been declared ineligible, and three are not recommended for any funding. Agencies declared ineligible were not providing their services within the municipal boundaries of the requested programs or did not meet basic eligibility requirements. Funding was denied if there were any performance issues, duplication of efforts or the lack of required organizational systems and structures.

Appeals and Reserve Allocation:

An amount of 6,977.00 has been set aside for appeals. Agencies have been notified in writing about the appeals process and the availability of funds.

Advances:

On February 4, 5, and 6, 1998, Toronto Council approved a policy to allow advance payments to agencies that received ongoing funding from the former municipalities provided specific criteria were met by the agencies. 1998 funding advances could not be used to cover existing deficits. Agencies could apply for an advance of up to 50 percent of the previous year's allocation or 100 percent if the total grant was 2,000.00 or less. In order to maintain a clear audit trail, agencies were required to complete a request form before an advance could be processed. Organizations with outstanding conditions, performance issues or significant changes had to be fully assessed before being considered for an advance payment. At the end of April, 28 agencies had requested advances on their 1998 allocations and had received a total of $71,442.00

Service Area Review:

There are a range of issues including: what is the appropriate level of agency accountability under the amalgamated program and what staff resources are required to ensure agency accountability; how can the City, as a funder, improve its ability to determine the effectiveness and impact of grants as a tool to address the needs of communities; and what mechanisms and policies need to be established to facilitate the redistribution of the resources within the Recreation Grants Program. These issues will be addressed through the Recreation Grants Program service area review and be reported out to the Municipal Grants Review Committee at its July 27, 1998, meeting.

Conclusions:

Community-based recreation agencies play an important role within Toronto. They contribute significantly to the quality of life in their local communities and offer opportunities to participate, be an audience member, volunteer and help make the City more liveable. Municipal support is critical to the existence of these agencies and provides some stability in these times of change.

This report recommends that a total of $363,970.00 be granted to 88 agencies under the Recreation Grants Program.

Contact Name:

Cathi Forbes, Culture Office North York Civic Centre, Tel: 395-6192/Fax: 395-7886, cforbes@city.north-york.on.ca.

--------

Appendix A

1998 Recreation Grants

Agency Name

Ward

No.

1997

Approved

Allocation

1998

Amount

Requested

1998

Amount

Recommended

1. African Canadian Cultural Collective

28

$ 2,000.00

$ 2,000.00

$ 2,000.00

2. Afropan Steelband

24

$ 1,500.00

$ 5,000.00

$ 1,500.00

3. Aiyegbo Ibilewa Cultural Program

21

$ 1000.00

$ 2,000.00

$ 1,000.00

4. Alexander Park Community Centre

24

$11,000.00

$11,000.00

$11,000.00

5. Applegrove Community Complex

26

$ 2,500.00

$ 2,500.00

$ 2,500.00

6. Association of Somali Service Agencies

23

$ 3,500.00

$ 5,000.00

$ 3,500.00

7. Beaches Arts Centre

26

$ 3,000.00

$14,000.00

$ 3,000.00

8. Black Ice Precision Skating Assoc.

6

$ 6,000.00

$13,000.00

$ 8,000.00

9. Boundless Adventure Association

23

$ 3,000.00

$ 3,000.00

$ 3,000.00

10. The Boys Home

25

$ 2,000.00

$ 3,000.00

$ 2,000.00

11. Canadian African Newcomer Aid Centre

23

N/A

$ 5,000.00

$ 3,800.00

12.

Cecil Community Centre

24

$ 4,000.00

$ 4,000.00

$ 4,000.00

13. Central Eglinton Community Centre

22

$ 3,730.00

$ 3,730.00

$ 3,730.00

14. Centre for Independent Living

24

$ 2,000.00

$ 4,200.00

$ 2,000.00

15. Champion Athletic Club

11

$ 5,100.00

$15,000.00

$ 6,000.00

16. Christie-Ossington Neighbourhood Centre

21

N/A

$12,500.00

$0.00

17. Circolo Italiano Deglie Anziani

20

$ 2,300.00

$ 3,000.00

$ 2,300.00

18. City Chess Club of Toronto

24

$ 1,100.00

$ 5,000.00

$ 1,100.00

19. Club Social Y Deportivo Guatemala

9

N/A

$ 5,000.00

$ 2,000.00

20. Community for the Riding Disabled

27

N/A

$10,000.00

Ineligible

21. Davenport Dufferin Community Centre

21

$ 1,225.00

$ 1,430.00

$ 1,225.00

22. Dovercourt Boys' and Girls' Club

21

$10,000.00

$20,000.00

$10,000.00

23. Downtown Care-Ring

25

$ 6,000.00

$10,000.00

$ 6,000.00

24. East Toronto Seniors Centre

26

$ 3,870.00

$ 3,870.00

$ 3,870.00

25. Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre

25

N/A

$ 4,438.00

$0.00

26. Ethiopian Association in Toronto

26

$ 4,500.00

$ 9,500.00

$ 4,500.00

27. Finnish Social Counselling Service

24

N/A

$ 2,400.00

Ineligible

28. First Portuguese Canadian Cultural Centre

20

$ 8,700.00

$ 8,700.00

$ 8,700.00

29. Friends of Dufferin Grove Park

20

$ 6,000.00

$ 6,000.00

$ 6,000.00

30. G.M. Sports Programs

12

N/A

$14,750.00

Withdrawn

31. Glebe Manor Lawn Bowling

9

$ 2,500.00

$12,500.00

$ 2,500.00

32. Globe Rangers Youth Club Inc.

21

$ 3,600.00

$ 4,100.00

$ 3,600.00

33. Gray Tigers Senior Citizens Club

21

$ 4,500.00

$ 4,800.00

$ 4,500.00

34. Harbourfront Community Centre

24

$ 3,000.00

$ 3,000.00

$ 3,000.00

35. Harriet Tubman Community Organization

12

$ 5,350.00

$ 7,000.00

$ 5,350.00

36. Heritage Skills

20

N/A

$ 6,000.00

$ 6,000.00

37. Hockey Association For Developmentally Challenged

6

$ 1,500.00

$ 2,500.00

$ 1,500.00

38. Hong Fook Mental Health Association

24

$ 1,000.00

$ 3,000.00

$ 1,000.00

39. Horseed Youth Club

4

N/A

$11,800.00

Ineligible

40. Houselink Community Homes

20

$ 1,270.00

$ 1,270.00

$ 1,270.00

41. Jessie's Centre for Teenagers

25

$ 3,000.00

$ 3,300.00

$ 3,000.00

42. Le Groupe Jeunesse Francophone De Toronto

24

$ 2,000.00

$ 5,000.00

$ 2,000.00

43. Le Regroupement des Filles Francophones

24

$ 3,500.00

$ 7,200.00

$ 3,500.00

44. Leaside Girls Hockey League

1

$ 2,500.00

$ 5,000.00

$ 2,500.00

45. McCormick's Shinney Hockey Program

20

$ 3,000.00

$ 5,200.00

$ 3,000.00

46. Metropolitan United Church Community Services

24

$ 1,000.00

$ 1,000.00

$ 1,000.00

47. Mixed Company

20

$ 2,000.00

$ 4,750.00

$ 2,000.00

48. Native African Inmates and Families Association

24

N/A

$ 3,000.00

$ 1,500.00

49. Neighbourhood Link

26

$ 4,000.00

$ 8,000.00

$ 4,000.00

50. North Toronto Gyros Athletic Club

8

$ 1,250.00

$ 1,250.00

$ 1,250.00

51. North York Aquatic Club

10

$17,000.00

$20,000.00

$17,000.00

52. North York Horticultural Society

10

$ 1,000.00

$ 1,000.00

$ 1,000.00

53. North York Hurling & Camogie Players' Club

8

$ 2,000.00

$ 6,095.00

$ 2,000.00

54. North York Masters' Aquatic Club

10

$ 4,500.00

$ 5,820.00

$ 4,500.00

55. North York Soccer Association

8

$ 4,500.00

$ 6,500.00

$ 4,500.00

56. North York Synchro Club

10

$ 3,000.00

$ 3,000.00

$ 3,000.00

57. Parkdale Golden Age Foundation

19

$ 3,444.00

$ 3,444.00

$ 3,444.00

58. Pegasus Community Project

2

$ 5,000.00

$10,000.00

$ 5,000.00

59. Polish Immigrant & Community Services

2

$ 2,100.00

$ 2,100.00

$ 2,100.00

60. Project C.A.N.O.E.

10

$ 7,800.00

$ 8,500.00

$ 7,800.00

61. Ralph Thornton Centre

25

$ 4,100.00

$ 4,100.00

$ 4,100.00

62. Regent Park Cricket Club

25

$ 3,300.00

$ 3,300.00

$ 3,300.00

63. Roseland Horticultural Society

27

$ 450.00

$ 500.00

$ 450.00

64. Sea Hawks Toronto (Youth Sailing Club)

22

$ 4,700.00

$ 4,700.00

$ 4,700.00

65. Second Mile Club of Toronto

24

$ 4,000.00

$ 4,000.00

$ 4,000.00

66. Senior Adult Services

23

$ 6,300.00

$ 7,800.00

$ 6,300.00

67. Shoot for the Stars

23

$ 6,000.00

$15,000.00

$ 6,000.00

68. South East Asian Services Centre

25

$ 2,000.00

$ 2,200.00

$ 2,000.00

69. Street Haven at the Crossroads

24

$ 2,000.00

$ 5,000.00

$ 2,000.00

70. Sunshine Centres for Seniors

24

$ 1,500.00

$ 1,500.00

$ 1,500.00

71. Swansea Area Seniors Association

19

$ 4,800.00

$ 6,200.00

$ 4,800.00

72. Swansea Girls Hockey League

19

$ 3,000.00

$ 3,000.00

$ 3,000.00

73. Swansea Seniors Duplicate Bridge Club

19

$ 1,575.00

$ 1,575.00

$ 1,575.00

74. Tapshoes and Tutus

19

$ 3,150.00

$ 3,150.00

$ 3,150.00

75. Toronto Beaches Minor LaCrosse Association

26

$ 3,800.00

$ 3,800.00

$ 3,800.00

76. Toronto Christian Resource Centre

25

$ 4,500.00

$ 6,000.00

$ 4,500.00

77. Toronto Friendship Centre Inc.

25

N/A

$ 5,000.00

$ 2,000.00

78. Toronto In-line Skating Club

19

$ 1,000.00

$ 1,000.00

$ 1,000.00

79. Toronto Kiwanis Boys and Girls Club

25

$17,500.00

$17,500.00

$17,500.00

80. Toronto Mainland Chinese Community Centre

24

N/A

$ 6,000.00

$ 3,000.00

81. Ukraina Sport Association

21

$ 8,000.00

$10,000.00

$ 8,000.00

82. Unemployed Professional African Watu Association

22

N/A

$10,000.00

$0.00

83. University of Toronto Gymnastics Club

24

$ 2,756.00

$ 2,756.00

$ 2,756.00

84. Vietnamese Youth & Women's Centre of Toronto

19

$ 9,000.00

$12,000.00

$11,000.00

85. Wallace Emerson Soccer Club Out-Reach

21

N/A

$ 5,000.00

$ 2,500.00

86. Warren Park Hockey Association

27

$ 3,250.00

$15,000.00

$ 3,250.00

87. Weston Figure Skating Club

27

$10,000.00

$10,000.00

$10,000.00

88. Weston Lawn Bowling Club

27

$ 2,000.00

$ 5,000.00

$ 2,000.00

89. Weston Minor Hockey League

27

$10,000.00

$25,000.00

$10,000.00

90. Working Women Community Centre

20

$ 2,500.00

$ 3,200.00

$ 2,500.00

91. Yoga Centre Toronto

22

$ 2,000.00

$ 5,000.00

$ 2,000.00

92. York Figure Skating Club

28

$14,000.00

$14,000.00

$14,000.00

93. York Gym Club

28

$ 2,750.00

$ 3,850.00

$ 2,750.00

94. York Swim Club

27

N/A

$24,876.00

$ 5,000.00

95. York Youth Connection

7

N/A

$10,000.00

$ 4,000.00

Total

$632,154.00

$363,970.00

(A copy of each of the Appendices B and C referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda for the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on June1,1998, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

--------

(Report dated June 5, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee, from the

Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism)

Purpose:

This report presents the recommended allocations from the Recreation Grants Program for the agencies which appealed to the Municipal Grants Review Committee for reconsideration.

Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:

The 1998 approved estimates provide for $370,947.00 for the Recreation Grants Program. Municipal Grants Review Committee received a report, entitled Recreation Grants Program - 1998 Allocations, on May 20, 1998, which recommended the allocation of $363,970.00 to 88 agencies. An amount of $6,977.00 was reserved to respond to agency appeals. If there was no redistribution, these funds would be awarded to the Portuguese Day Festivities.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the Y.M.C.A. Etobicoke Youth Centre (Grant No. 456, Community Service Grants Program) be recommended for a grant of $3,500.00 from the Contingency Fund, subject to the approval of the Use of Contingency Fund Report currently before the Municipal Grants Review Committee, and that future requests be directed through the Recreation Grants Program; and

(2)the appropriate City officials be authorized to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Council Reference/Background/History:

Under the general authority for making municipal grants provided in Section 113(1) of the Municipal Act, the City of Toronto provides funds to eligible organizations which operate recreation/sports programs.

On May 20, 1998, the Municipal Grants Review Committee received a report, entitled "Recreation Grants Program - 1998 Allocations", which recommended allocations totalling $363,970.00 for 88 agencies.

Four organizations provided written and/or verbal presentations to the Municipal Grants Review Committee regarding either the amount of funding recommended to their agency, or the fact that they were not recommended for funding.

In developing recommendations with regard to how the existing appeal funds could be allocated, staff reviewed the original recommendations and considered the information presented in the deputations.

A total of $6,977.00 was available for 1998 Recreation Grants Programs appeals.

Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:

Grounds for Appeal:

The Terms of Reference for the Recreation Grants Programs state that justifiable grounds for appeal are:

(a)presentation of documented proof that unforeseen circumstances have arisen since the original application; and

(b)misinterpretation of the original application and written submission clarifying the area of contention.

Of the four organizations which appealed their allocations, two were new applicants not recommended for support, and the other two were returning agencies. These two returning agencies were recommended for flatline allocations for their 1998 grants.

New Applicants:

Based on the information provided during the deputations and a review of agency applications, staff have confirmed the original recommendations that the agencies are ineligible for Recreation Grants under specific criteria. Staff are meeting with other funders to identify possible supports to assist agencies and, where appropriate, to encourage agency co-ordination/collaboration.

Returning Applicants:

Of the two returning applicants who appealed, both received initial recommendations for flatline allocations.

Staff have reviewed the materials and deputation comments provided by the two agencies which were originally recommended for flatlined allocations and have confirmed the initial grant recommendations. The additional information and issues raised by these agencies did not justify increases in the original recommendations since the approach for all allocations for 1998 was to flatline agencies.

Y.M.C.A. of Greater Toronto, Etobicoke Youth Centre:

At the deputation by the Y.M.C.A. of Greater Toronto of its Community Service Grant recommendation, the applicant requested clarification of the in-kind grant of $3,500.00 awarded to the Y.M.C.A. Etobicoke Youth Centre last year and the feasibility of receiving such support in 1998. In 1997, the Central Etobicoke Y.M.C.A. Youth Centre's Recreation Program had been recommended for a $2,500.00 grant, and on appeal, had received additional in-kind staff support of $3,500.00. Council Resolution No. 403, October 6, 1997, states "that the Etobicoke Parks and Recreation Services support the recreational component of the Y.M.C.A.- Central Etobicoke Youth Centre through the provision of part-time staff hours in the total amount of $3,500.00 and that funds for this purpose be obtained from the 1997 Operating Budget of the Parks and Recreation Services Department."

This provided one-time staff support, not on-going support. The 1998 Parks and Recreation Department's Operating Budget as approved does not include staff dollars for the Central Etobicoke Youth Centre. However, this agency did not request or apply for a Recreation Grant to cover the cost of the required part-time staff. This is a worthy program and deserving of support. There are no other sources of funding available except the Contingency Fund to ensure delivery of service in 1998.

Conclusion:

Based on reviews of the Recreation Grants Programs applications, and the information presented through the deputations, staff are recommending their original recommendations.

(A copy of Appendix A referred to in the foregoing report was forwarded to all Members of Council with the agenda for the Municipal Grants Review Committee for its meeting on June1,1998, and a copy thereof is on file in the office of the City Clerk.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee also submits the following communication (June 18, 1998) from Ms. Elain Daviau, Artistic Director, The Beach Arts Centre:

Thank you for your support through offering us a grant of $3,000.00. We appreciate the concern you have for the people in the communities of the City.

I would, however, like to ask for a reconsideration of our grant amount. Last year the Beach Arts Centre received $3,000.00 as a grant but after an appeal we also received an amount that would cover the taxes on the building we are now leasing. We would like to ask for a further $11,000.00 to cover some of this years taxes. There are two reasons for our request. The first is that we are a registered charity and if we owned our building we would get tax relief. The second is that if we could lobby for relief putting into effect Bill 149 due to the fact we are a registered charity we could get some relief. The problem is that we are starting procedures to try to possess the building. It would be redundant to lobby for relief now. If we do get possession of the building the taxes may well be reduced for next year anyway. We hope you can understand our position and will allow us the added amount to help cover the taxes. We appreciate your kind concern for this situation.

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, had before it, during consideration of the foregoing Clause, the following report (July 9, 1998) from the City Clerk:

Recommendation:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee recommends the adoption of the attached report (July 6, 1998) from Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby, Chair, Municipal Grants Review Committee, respecting the grant appeal from the Weston Minor Hockey League (Grant No. 89), subject to adding the words "and any other cost saving measures" to Item No. (3) under the actions suggested in the body of the report of the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, so that such item reads as follows:

"(3)Parks and Recreation Division staff will assist Weston Minor Hockey League with the development of a fund raising plan and any other cost saving measures;";

and reports having taken no action with respect to the recommendation contained in the report dated July 6, 1998, from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism regarding the grant appeal of Christie-Ossington Neighbourhood Centre (Grant No. 16), viz.:

"That Christie-Ossington Neighbourhood Centre be funded up to $6,000.00 from the grants contingency, if appropriate.",

having regard that the adoption of such recommendation lost on a tie vote.

The Municipal Grants Review Committee further reports, for the information of Council, having requested the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism to submit a status report to the Municipal Grants Review Committee in September or October, 1998, on the issues related to the Weston Minor Hockey League's appeal.

Background:

The Municipal Grants Review Committee on July 9, 1998, had before it the following reports and communications:

-(July 6, 1998) from Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby, Chair, Municipal Grants Review Committee, responding to the request to report on the outcome of the meeting held with the Management Board of the Weston Lions Arena, and on other issues related to the appeal of the grant for the Weston Minor Hockey League (Grant No. 89);

-(June 30, 1998) from the Interim Secretary, Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, advising that the Committee on June 30, 1998, submitted to Council, without recommendation, the recommendation of the Municipal Grants Review Committee respecting the Recreation Grants Program - 1998 Allocations and Appeals; and further requested the Municipal Grants Review Committee to reconsider a grant of $6,000.00 to the Christie-Ossington Neighbourhood Centre (Grant No. 16) and to clarify where "duplication of services" exists in that neighbourhood and report to Council on July 8, 1998, at the time the Recreation Grants Program is considered; and

-(July 6, 1998) from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism respecting the grant appeal from the Christie-Ossington Neighbourhood Centre.

The following persons appeared before the Municipal Grants Review Committee in connection with the foregoing matters:

-Councillor Frances Nunziata, York - Humber, regarding the grant appeal of the Weston Minor Hockey League, and requested one-time additional funding in the amount of $10,000.00 for the League; and

-Ms. Lynn Daly, Christie-Ossington Neighbourhood Centre.

(Report dated July 6, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee

from Councillor Lindsay Luby, Chair.)

Purpose of Report:

To report on the outcome of meetings with the Management Board of the Weston Lions Arena and other issues related to the appeal of the grant for the Weston Hockey League.

Funding Implications:

There are no financial implications of this report.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)the appeal from the Weston Minor Hockey League be denied;

(2)the staff from the Parks and Recreation Division continue to work with the Weston Minor Hockey League on funding alternatives, revenue generation, and ice allocation;

(3)the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism report to the Economic Development Committee with an update on the status of the City's relationship with the Arenas that are operated by Boards of Management, and related community minor sport issues; and

(4)the appropriate City officials be authorized to give effect thereto.

Comments:

As directed by the Municipal Grants Review Committee, I met with the Board of the Weston Lions Arena along with several staff from the Parks and Recreation Division on June 23, 1998, to discuss the issue of the rental rates for the Weston Minor Hockey League for use of the Weston Lions Arena.

This issue is quite complex. The Board of Management of the Lions Arena is fulfilling its mandate of operating this facility on a cost-recovery basis and is charging what they feel to be an appropriate rental fee. This rental fee of $168.00 per hour is the highest rate for a community based league of any Board or City operated facility in Toronto, but is still less than the private sector rinks in Toronto. The City-operated rinks have a $92.00 per hour rate for community based leagues, and this is part of the complexity of this issue.

At the meeting, the following actions were suggested and have been acted upon:

(1)that the Parks and Recreation Division Staff meet with the Weston Minor Hockey League to discuss possible solutions;

(2)Weston Minor Hockey League should request a grant from the Lions Club and the Arena Board of Management (this had been granted up until three years ago but application has not been made in the last three years);

(3)Parks and Recreation Division staff will assist Weston Minor Hockey League with the development of a fund-raising plan; and

(4)Weston Minor Hockey League should examine its fees and consider raising them to be more in line with other clubs in the area.

Subsequent to the initial meeting, a number of other possibilities have been initiated. These include:

(1)Alternate ice times for practices and games will be investigated at City-operated rinks outside of York, but within the catchment area of the League. This may reduce ice time costs for the league.

(2)Weston Minor Hockey League will be provided with the details on how to apply for subsides from the Ian (Scotty) Thomson Children's Fund to offset the cost of participation for individuals who may face financial barriers.

(3)The Parks and Recreation Division will be providing a presentation to the Board of the Weston Minor Hockey Association on fund-raising alternatives.

It should be noted that the $168.00 per hour rate has not changed in the last several years and it is paid by other minor sports leagues using this facility including the Weston Skating Club.

Although these measures will assist the Weston Minor Hockey Association in improving their financial position, they will not address the wider issue of the governance of the Boards of Management Operated Facilities and the resulting financial inequities to the minor sports groups of the City. I am suggesting that the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism report on this more complicated issue this fall.

Conclusion:

This issue is clearly not appropriate to be addressed through the Municipal Grants Process. The flat line approach to the $10,000.00 grant to the Weston Minor Hockey League is appropriate since nothing has changed in the way of rental rates or fees over 1997, and, more importantly, an increase in a grant to this organization would create a parade of grant appeals from other community sports leagues who may find themselves in a similar situation.

The interim list of actions proposed at the meetings is appropriate and already in motion. I am suggesting that the longer term implications of this overall ice rate/arena governance issue be the subject of a more complete report from the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism this fall.

(Report dated July 6, 1998, addressed to the

Municipal Grants Review Committee, from

the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture and Tourism.)

Purpose:

To provide further detail and clarification with respect to appeal for funding.

Source of Funds:

Grant Review Committee.

Recommendation:

That Christie-Ossington Neighbourhood Centre be funded up to $6,000.00 from the grants contingency, if appropriate.

Background:

Christie-Ossington Neighbourhood Centre was not recommended for funding primarily because of the direction given to staff that minor grant recreation recipients in 1997 were a priority. Since Christie-Ossington was a new application, recommending funding was difficult in view of the fact that all of the funds were already allocated to community groups that were previously funded. Further, Christie-Ossington has been recommended for a total of $59,832.00 from other grants programs for specific initiatives.

The request for the recreation grant was to operate a day camp called "The Nook" which has previously operated at the Essex Public School, but will move to Christie Pits this summer. There are other service providers in this area including several Parks and Recreation Department Providers. The Staff from the Parks and Recreation Division continues to work successfully in partnership with Christie-Ossington on a number of projects.

Comments:

In the Minor Recreation Grants Report to the Grant Review Committee, reference was made to duplication as part of the rationale for not recommending funding. In terms of clarification, the current involvement of four different recreation centres with Christie-Ossington in a variety of projects meant that a minor recreation grant would be another addition to the existing partnerships.

The recreation centres of Bob Abate, Joseph J. Piccininni, McCormick and Wallace Emerson work in partnership with and provide staff resources that we provide to support this and other community groups. This is a full partnership community developmental program that is unique in many ways.

Conclusions:

It is important to note that Christie-Ossington runs an excellent program that is needed by the community it serves. However, our guidelines are to provide funding for groups that we normally fund, and they have assumed over 90 percent of the allocated budget. If funding can be found from the contingency fund, then this community group should be supported up to the $6,000.00 level.

Contact Name:

Ken Jeffers, Community Services Administrator - 392-7019.)

29

Public Meetings - Assessment and Taxation Issues

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

Having regard for the fact that the Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force has already widely advertised public meetings on July 6 and 7, 1998, to consider assessment and property tax issues, the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends that all deputations be heard by the Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force and that the report of the Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force on the issue of phasing be reported to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee at its meeting on July 14, 1998.

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having:

(1)referred the concerns of Councillors Jakobek and Brown to the Mayor and requested that he, in consultation with the City Clerk and the Chief Administrative Officer, attempt to ensure an orderly Council meeting when the assessment and tax issues are discussed; and

(2)invited and encouraged all members of Council to attend the Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force public meetings on July 6 and 7, 1998.

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following transmittal letter (June18, 1998) from the Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force:

Recommendations:

The Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force on June 15, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and City Council the following:

(1)that, if the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, when considering the issue of phase-in of tax increases due to amalgamation and Current Value Assessment, decides that deputations should be heard by the Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force, then the recommendations of the Task Force on the issue of phasing be reported directly to Council; and

(2)that City Council be requested to convene a meeting of the Council in Committee of the Whole to hear deputations from the public on all assessment and taxation issues and that the public be so advised.

The Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force reports having confirmed the procedure that deputations on a given matter set out in a comprehensive report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, will take place at the Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force on the day that the particular comprehensive report dealing with that given matter is being dealt with and that the deputants be advised that the Task Force recommendations will be forwarded to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee and that they can request to make a deputation at the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, as well.

The Task Force also reports having requested the Mayor to submit his request to Council in the form of a Notice of Motion requesting a suspension of the Procedural By-law with respect to the rights of citizens to speak to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee. The Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force is on record as supporting the rights of citizens under the existing Procedural By-law.

Background:

The Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force had before it a communication (June 5, 1998) from the City Clerk advising the Task Force of Council's action from its meeting held on June 3, 4, and5,1998, respecting a revised timetable to facilitate the decision-making process on tax policy.

The Chair orally advised the Task Force that the Mayor's office had requested that all deputations on this matter be held at the Task Force.

--------

(Motion by Councillor Adams, which was adopted by

City Council at its meeting held on June 3, 4 and 5, 1998)

City Council, at its meeting held on June 3, 4 and 5, 1998, adopted, without amendment, the following Motion:

Moved by:Councillor Adams

Seconded by:Councillor Augimeri

"WHEREAS Bill 16, the Small Business and Charities Protection Act, 1998 is not yet passed into law; and

WHEREAS the assessment roll will not be returned until Bill 16 has received Royal Assent; and

WHEREAS the earliest expected date to receive the roll is June 12, 1998;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the following revised timetable cancelling the June22 and 23, 1998, Special Council meeting be adopted by Council to facilitate the decision-making process on tax policy:

July 6, 7, 1998Assessment and Tax Policy Task Force;

July 13, 1998Budget Committee at 2:00 p.m. (moved from July 21, 1998);

July 14, 1998Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee at 2:00 p.m.;

July 15-17, 1998Council Briefings; and

July 21, 23, 1998Special Council Meeting."

30

Legislation Respecting Canadian Financial Institutions

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, deferred consideration of this Clause to the next regular meeting of City Council to be held on July 29, 1998.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends that the following motion of Councillor Mihevc be received and a copy forwarded to the Federal Government for consideration:

City Council, at its meeting held on June 3, 4 and 5, 1998, referred the following Motion to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee:

Moved by:Councillor Mihevc

Seconded by:Councillor Walker

"WHEREAS national polls have shown that most Canadians oppose the proposed Royal Bank-Bank of Montreal and CIBC-TD Bank mergers; and

WHEREAS the two mergers would eliminate up to 65,000 jobs, many of them in Toronto; and

WHEREAS access to capital is a major problem for Canadian small business owners and a concern for all Canadians, since small businesses create 80 percent of all new jobs in Canada; and

WHEREAS Canadian Bankers Association figures reveal that loans to Metro Toronto small businesses (those with business credit under $250,000.00), dropped from $4.11 billion in 1995 to $2.86 billion in 1996 (latest available figures); and

WHEREAS these problems reflect a lack of accountability by banks to local communities; and

WHEREAS U.S. laws such as the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) have worked well for 20years to ensure that U.S. financial institutions lend to small businesses and help meet other local needs, while remaining profitable; and

WHEREAS Toronto's housing shortage could be alleviated with funding through CRA-style legislation, just as agreements between U.S. community organizations and financial institutions under the CRA have financed housing in U.S. communities; and

WHEREAS a federal Task Force on the Future of the Canadian Financial Services Sector is reviewing financial institution legislation, with a report due in September; and

WHEREAS there is growing support for information disclosure and public accountability requirements for financial institutions as expressed in the 1997 election platforms of the federal Liberal, Progressive Conservative, NDP and Bloc Quebecois parties, and by a national coalition of over 70 groups, including the Toronto Small Business Support Organization, the Fort York Small Business Association, and the Social Planning Council;

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT Toronto City Council urges the federal government to enact legislation to ensure that Canadian financial institutions remain accountable to consumer, small business and community interests, for example:

(1)require banks to disclose the number of loan applications, as well as approvals and rejections, categorized by size of loan, size, type and location of business and gender of the business owner, to track the demand for capital and whether banks are meeting the demand;

(2)require banks to disclose reasons for rejections, loan defaults, loan losses and the number of called loans, to track the risk of lending to different sectors, communities and regions; and

(3)require other deposit-taking financial institutions to collect and disclose similar statistics to ensure a level playing field;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Toronto City Council urges the federal government to also enact requirements to determine how well financial institutions are serving consumers by requiring each institution to disclose:

(1)the number of complaints received each year, and the rate of resolving complaints;

(2)the number of lawsuits initiated by customers against the institution, and the number won, lost or settled;

(3)whether the banks are providing access to basic banking services for all residents of Canada (based on an independent audit); and

(4)the location of branches opened or closed;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Toronto City Council urge the Federal government to require the Superintendent of Financial Institutions to evaluate the above data annually and grade each financial institution's performance. The institution would receive a poor grade if the evaluation reveals, for example, that the institution arbitrarily rejects certain types of loan applicants, maintains excessive barriers to access to basic banking services, or has a high rate of complaints or successful lawsuits against the institution;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Toronto City Council support establishment of incentives for financial institutions to encourage them to improve their performance, including:

(1)as Ontario has done, federal and provincial governments should consider imposing a surtax on financial institutions, combined with a tax credit that could be applied to the surtax based on the institution's performance in meeting community needs;

(2)as Ontario has done, governments should not contract out business to financial institutions that fail to serve community needs;

(3)as in the U.S., the federal government should deny applications to expand or merge by financial institutions with a failing grade;

AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Toronto City Council urges the federal government to require banks and other financial institutions to:

(1)fund a truly independent ombudsman with the power to make binding rulings;

(2)guarantee everyone living in Canada an account with a deposit-taking financial institution, including the option or a low-cost, no-frills account, and protection from arbitrary and excessive holding of cheques; and

(3)facilitate the startup of a Financial Consumer Organization (FCO) by enclosing the FCO's flyer periodically in their customer mailings."

31

Contract No. T-42-98 - Don Valley Parkway

Resurfacing at Two Locations

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, adopted this Clause, without amendment.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends that:

(1)Contract No. T-42-98 for the resurfacing on the Don Valley Parkway at two locations be awarded to Warren Bitulithic Limited, who submitted the lowest price bid in the amount of $2,554,897.17, conditional upon Warren Bitulithic Limited accepting payment for this work in 1999;

(2)funds for this project be charged to the 1999 Capital Transportation Program Budget; and

(3)the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee submits the following transmittal letter (June26, 1998) from the Budget Committee:

Recommendations:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council:

(1)the approval of Contract No. T-42-98 for the resurfacing on the Don Valley Parkway at two locations, conditional upon the lowest bidder accepting payment for this work in 1999;

(2)that funds for this project be charged to the 1999 Capital Transportation Program Budget; and

(3)that the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Background:

The Budget Committee on June 25, 1998, had before it the following:

(a)communication (March 30, 1998) from Councillor Joe Pantalone;

(b)communication (June 15, 1998) from the Interim Functional Lead, Transportation, addressed to the Chair, Urban Environment and Development Committee; and

(c)a transmittal letter (May 15, 1998) from the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee referring the transmittal letter (April 22, 1998) from the Urban Environment and Development Committee, to the Budget Committee with a request that it report back to Council with its report on the $9.1 million Capital Projects.

Councillor Pantalone, Trinity-Niagara, Chair of the Urban Environment and Development Committee, appeared before the Budget Committee in connection with the foregoing matter.

--------

(Communication dated March 30, 1998 addressed to the

Budget Committee from Councillor Joe Pantalone, Chair

of the Urban Environment and Development Committee)

I am writing to request an opportunity to address the Committee regarding Contract NumberT-42-98.

At a previous meeting, the Urban Environment and Development Committee approved this and requested it be considered by Toronto City Council. Budget Committee's deferral means a de facto decision has been taken that work will not occur this year since the construction period will have lapsed. It was the intention of the Urban Environment and Development Committee that the matter be dealt with by Council in timely fashion. I therefore respectfully request this item be considered and forwarded to Council for its July 8th meeting.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

(Communication dated June 15, 1998 addressed to

Councillor Joe Pantalone from the Interim Functional Lead of

Transportation Services Division, Works & Emergency Services)

This project was tendered prior to budget approval, on the assumption that the 1998 Transportation Capital Works Budget would be approved at a level similar to the 1997 budget. However, the approved Transportation Capital Works Budget does not include this project. The "low bidder", Warren Bitulithic Limited, has indicated that they are willing to proceed with this project and be paid at a later date. This could occur next year as part of the 1999 Capital Works Programme or later in 1998, if funds become available from the sale of property assets.

At its meeting on May 26th, 1998, the Budget Committee deferred consideration of the above item until September 1998. If the Budget Committee does not deal with this item until that date, it will be too late to complete this resurfacing project in 1998.

If there is still interest in accepting the contractor's proposal to do this work in 1998, then it would be essential to adopt the following Committee Schedule:

June 25, 1998 Budget Committee
June 30, 1998 Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee
July 8, 1998 Council

This preferred schedule would enable the contract to commence on September 14th, 1998 and be completed by October 5th, 1998. In addition, the two month lead time will allow the contractor to take delivery of the required materials and allow consultation with stakeholders affected by the revised closure dates on the Don Valley Parkway.

If the schedule is not adopted, then it will be impossible to complete the work during this construction season.

--------

(Transmittal Letter dated May 15, 1998, addressed to the

Budget Committee from the

Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee)

On May 5, 1998, the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee had before it a transmittal letter (April 22, 1998) from the Urban Environment and Development Committee recommending to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of the following Recommendations Nos. (1), (2) and (3), contained in the report (April 9, 1998) from the Interim Functional Lead, Transportation, regarding Contract No. T-42-98 for the resurfacing of the Don Valley Parkway at two locations:

(1)pre-budget approval of $2,700,000.00 be granted for the 1999 Capital Works Program or, alternatively, that funds be provided from the sale of property assets as outlined in this report;

(2)subject to approval of Recommendation No. (1), Contract No. T-42-98, for the resurfacing on the Don Valley Parkway at two locations, be awarded to Warren Bitulithic Limited who submitted the lowest price bid in the amount of $2,554,897.17; and

(3)the appropriate City of Toronto officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee referred the transmittal letter (April 22, 1998) from the Urban Environment and Development Committee to the Budget Committee with the request that it report back to Council with its report on the $9.1 million Capital Project.

--------

(Transmittal Letter dated April 22, 1998, addressed to the

Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee from the

Urban Environment and Development Committee)

Recommendation:

The Urban Environment and Development Committee on April 20, 1998, recommended to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, and Council, the adoption of Recommendations Nos.(1), (2) and (3), embodied in the attached report (April9, 1998) from the Interim Functional Lead, Transportation, regarding Contract No. T-42-98 for the resurfacing of the Don Valley Parkway at two locations.

--------

(Report dated April 9, 1998, addressed to the

Urban Environment and Development Committee from the

Interim Functional Lead, Transportation)

Purpose:

To seek early approval to allocate $2,700,000.00 from either the 1999 Capital Works Program or from the proceeds from the sale of property assets in 1998 and to award a contract for the resurfacing of the Don Valley Parkway at two locations.

Funding Source:

The total project cost is estimated to be $2,700,000.00 and is summarized as follows:

(1)Bid Price Amount $2,554,897.17

(2)Other costs (estimate):145,102.83

(a)quality control testing;

(b)traffic signage and road closures; and

(c)bicycle proof catch basin frames and covers.

____________

Total project cost $2,700,000.00

____________

Resurfacing and rehabilitation work on the Don Valley Parkway has traditionally been carried out early in the construction year to minimize disruption to the travelling public during the summer tourist season. Consequently, this project was tendered prior to budget approval, on the assumption that the 1998 Transportation Capital Works Budget would be approved at a level similar to the 1997 budget. However, based on the recommendations of the Budget Committee, the Transportation Capital Works Budget for the City of Toronto, which is scheduled to be approved by Council at its meeting on April 28, 1998, now does not include this project.

An unusual situation has arisen in which the "low bidder", Warren Bitulithic Limited, has indicated that it is willing to proceed with this project and be paid at a later date. This could occur next year as part of the 1999 Capital Works Program or later in 1998, if funds become available from the sale of property assets. This was proposed by the Budget Committee in order to provide funds for works which have had to be deferred as a result of the Budget Committee's recommendations to delete $18.4 million from the Capital Budget submission. Warren Bitulithic Limited has confirmed in writing that it will conform with all of the conditions in the original tender documents and that it will not seek any compensation for "late" payment. This proposal by Warren Bitulithic Limited does not violate the integrity of the "tender and award" process.

The Department is recommending that the proposal from Warren Bitulithic Limited be accepted because it is important to resurface and repair the drainage system for this section of the DonValleyParkway in 1998 for the following reasons:

(1)previous experience with the performance of the existing steel slag surface asphalt indicates that accelerated deterioration may occur during the next winter season. This situation would require unscheduled closures of the Don Valley Parkway to undertake emergency repairs; and

(2)the existing drainage facilities in their current state of disrepair are capable of being rehabilitated insitu with little or no disruption to the users of the Don Valley Parkway. Further deterioration may lead to open cut replacement of these facilities at a significantly higher cost and requiring additional closures of the Don Valley Parkway.

Funding is currently available in Capital Account No. C-TR029, Don Valley Parkway Rehabilitation. The Treasurer certifies that financing can be provided under the updated Debt and Financial Obligation Limit and that it falls within Corporate Debt Guidelines.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

(1)pre-budget approval of $2,700,000.00 be granted for the 1999 Capital Works Program or, alternatively, that funds be provided from the sale of property assets as outlined in this report;

(2)subject to approval of Recommendation No. (1), Contract No. T-42-98, for the resurfacing on the Don Valley Parkway at two locations, be awarded to Warren Bitulithic Limited who submitted the lowest price bid in the amount of $2,554,897.17;

(3)the appropriate City of Toronto officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto; and

(4)this report be forwarded to the Budget Committee.

Comments:

On March 5, 1998, the City Clerk's Department opened tenders for:

Contract No. T-42-98 -Don Valley Parkway Resurfacing at Two Locations

NumberName$ Amount

5Warren Bitulithic Limited2,554,897.17

1D. Crupi and Sons Limited2,569,306.89

6Dufferin Construction Company, 2,611,639.95

a division of St. Lawrence Cement Inc.

7Pave-Al Limited and Orlando Corporation2,613,676.89

4Graham Bros. Construction Ltd., Fairglen Excavating Ltd.,2,729,506.91

795208 Ontario Ltd., Graham Bros. Aggregate Ltd.

3Gazzola Paving Limited2,898,044.82

2Brennan Paving and Construction Limited2,921,347.98

The award is subject to receipt of a favourable report from the Fair Wage and Labour Trades Office regarding working conditions and wages of the recommended contractor and his sub-contractors, andalso from the Treasurer regarding the surety company which issued the Bid Bond and Agreement to Bond.

Scope of Work:

The work in this contract comprises the asphalt resurfacing of the Don Valley Parkway including the rehabilitation and/or replacement of catch basin connections, replacement of guiderail and attenuation systems and permanent pavement markings at the following locations:

(1)southbound from Don Mills Road to Beechwood Drive; and

(2)Don Mills Road ramps.

Conclusion:

Subject to City Council approving $2,700,000.00 for the 1999 Capital Works Program, Contract No.T-42-98 should be awarded to Warren Bitulithic Limited which submitted the lowest price bid for this Contract.

Contact Name and Telephone Number:

Mr. R. Burlie, P. Eng.,

Manager of Resurfacing, Metro Hall Office, 392-8322.

32

Bus Garage Replacement Project - Property Acquisition

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, amended this Clause by adding thereto the following:

"It is further recommended that:

(1)the Chief General Manager of the Toronto Transit Commission be requested to submit a report to the Urban Environment and Development Committee on any future routing changes as a consequence of the new TTC bus garage relocating in Scarborough;

(2)the Chief Administrative Officer and the Chief General Manager of the Toronto Transit Commission be requested to submit a report to the Urban Environment and Development Committee on changes to current protocol of the Toronto Transit Commission to provide that City Councillors representing Wards in which initiatives are being considered and that will have an effect on the local community are kept informed of intentions/progress prior to any final decisions at the Commission;

(3)the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services, in consultation with appropriate staff of the City of Toronto and the Chief General Manager of the Toronto Transit Commission, be requested to submit a further report to the Urban Environment and Development Committee on any necessary improvements to the road system to facilitate the operation of this facility; and

(4)the City Solicitor be requested to submit a report to the Corporate Services Committee on what steps need to be taken to permit the appropriate officials to purchase property without having to reveal the City as the buyer until the purchase is completed."

In addition, City Council, at its in-camera portion of the meeting, issued instructions to staff, such instructions to remain confidential in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Act.)

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee recommends the adoption of the recommendations in the confidential transmittal letter (June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee, which transmittal letter was forwarded to Members of Council under confidential cover.

(City Council on July 8, 9, and 10, 1998, had before it, during consideration of the foreogoing Clause, a confidential report (July 8, 1998) from the Commissioner of Corporate Services, such report to remain confidential in accordance with the provisions of Section 55(9) of the Municipal Act.)

33

Other Items Considered by the Committee

(City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998, received this Clause, for information.)

(a)1997 Financial Statements of The Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having received the 1997 Financial Statements of the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place:

(May 26, 1998) from the Audit Committee forwarding a report (May 11, 1998) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the 1997 Financial Statements of the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place, copies of which were forwarded to all Members of Council with the Agenda for the Audit Committee meeting held on May 21, 1998.

(b)1997 Financial Statements of The Metropolitan Toronto Sinking Funds

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having received the 1997 Financial Statements of the Metropolitan Toronto Sinking Funds:

(May 26, 1998) from the Audit Committee forwarding a report (May 11, 1998) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the 1997 Financial Statements of the Metropolitan Toronto Sinking Funds, copies of which were forwarded to all Members of Council with the Agenda for the Audit Committee meeting held on May 21, 1998.

(c)1997 Financial Statements of Various Business Improvement Areas, The Parking Authority of Toronto, St. Lawrence Centre for the Performing Arts, Applegrove Community Centre and Moss Park Arena in the Former City of Toronto

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having received the 1997 Financial Statements of various Business Improvement Areas, the Parking Authority of Toronto, St. Lawrence Centre for the Performing Arts, Applegrove Community Centre and Moss Park Arena in the former City of Toronto:

(May 26, 1998) from the Audit Committee forwarding the 1997 Financial Statements of various Business Improvement Areas, the Parking Authority of Toronto, St. Lawrence Centre for the Performing Arts, Applegrove Community Centre and Moss Park Arena in the former City of Toronto, copies of which were forwarded to all Members of Council with the Agenda for the Audit Committee meeting held on May 21, 1998.

(d)Protection of the City's Tax Base

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having received the transmittal letter (June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee, in connection with Clause No. 10 of Report No. 7 of the Corporate Services Committee, headed "Protection of the City's Tax Base", which was referred to the Budget Committee for further consideration by City Council on June 3, 4 and 5, 1998:

(June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee advising that it received the report (April 16, 1998) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and requested the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to provide a further report to the Budget Committee in September, and in the meantime, every effort be made to protect the City's tax base pending receipt of the report.

(e)Delivery of 1998/1999 Downspout Disconnection Program

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having:

(1)received the transmittal letter (June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee on the delivery of 1998/1999 Downspout Disconnection Program; and

(2)requested the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services, for the 1998 project, to pay special attention to houses along the Davenport Escarpment, and particularly along the Garrison Creek area north of the Escarpment, to ensure that flooding does not occur.

(June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee advising that it had received the report (June 16, 1998) from the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services, and requested the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services, in consultation with the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services, to report back to the Budget Committee in the spring of 1999 on the feasibility of hiring summer students to carry out the actual work involved in the program.

(f)Prince Edward (Bloor Street) Viaduct: Measures to Deter Suicide Attempts

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having recommended to City Council the adoption of the recommendations embodied in the transmittal letter (June26, 1998) from the Budget Committee; and that such recommendation be considered with Clause No. 2 of Report No. 8 of Urban Environment and Development Committee headed "Prince Edward (Bloor Street) Viaduct - Measures to Deter Suicide Attempts":

(June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee recommending:

(1)an adequate expenditure be allocated from the Corporate Contingency Account to undertake the project to avert suicides on the Bloor Street Viaduct and that the cost be no more than $1.5 million; and

(2)the recommendation of the Urban Environment and Development Committee be brought back to the Budget Committee in the fall for the final allocation of funding.

(g)Toronto City Hall Renovations

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee report having received the transmittal letter (June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee with respect to the Toronto City Hall Renovations:

(June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee advising that it had received the report (June17, 1998) from the Commissioner of Corporate Services, submitting a copy of the report (June16, 1998) entitled "Toronto City Hall Renovations - Recommended Actions in Response to Committee and City Council Motions and Additional Phase I Budget Requirements".

(h)Status on Funding - 1996 Ompa (Ontario Mas Producers Association) Agreement - 1996 Annual Caribana Parade

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having received the transmittal letter (June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee on the status of funding for the 1996 Annual Caribana Parade:

(June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee advising that it had received the report (June 12, 1998) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer regarding the status on funding regarding the 1996 Ontario Mas Producers Association (OMPA) agreement relating to the 1996 Caribana Parade.

(i)Toronto Police Reference Check Program

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having referred the recommendations in the transmittal letter (June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee back to the Budget Committee and requested the Mayor to meet with the Chair of the Police Services Board:

(June 26, 1998) from the Budget Committee with respect to the Toronto Police Reference Check Program and Council's previous decision in this regard.

(j)Appointment Process and Costs Related to Establishment of Ad Hoc/Special Purpose Committees and Task Forces

The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee reports having requested:

(1)the Chief Administrative Officer to provide clarification of the role of the Special Committee when reviewing the Final Report of the Toronto Transition Team and other Committees with respect to the appointment process; and

(2)the City Clerk to report to the Corporate Services Committee on the costs to the municipality of supporting Ad Hoc/Special Purpose Committees and Task Forces and that these costs be taken into consideration and funds provided every time any such Committee or Task Force is struck.

(May 20, 1998) from the Works and Utilities Committee referring the following motion to the Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee for consideration:

"That the City Clerk be requested to provide clarification of the role of the Special Committee to Review the Final Report of the Toronto Transition Team and other Committee with respect to the appointments process."

Respectfully submitted,

MEL LASTMAN,

Chair

Toronto, June 30, 1998

(Report No. 10 of The Strategic Policies and Priorities Committee, including additions thereto, was adopted, as amended, by City Council on July 8, 9 and 10, 1998.)

 

   
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@city.toronto.on.ca.

 

City maps | Get involved | Toronto links
© City of Toronto 1998-2001