March 11, 1999
To:Budget Committee
From:Shirley Hoy, Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services
Subject:Weekly update on Negotiations with the Ontario Dental Association Report
Purpose:
To inform the Budget Committee on the progress of negotiations with the Ontario Dental
Association.
Source of Funds:
Not Applicable
Recommendations:
That the Budget Committee receives this report for information.
Background:
On February 19, 1999 the Ontario Dental Association (ODA) deputed at the Budget
Committee on the Public Health proposal to harmonize dental services in the new City. At
that time the Budget Committee directed staff to meet with the ODA and to share information
that would allow the ODA to develop and submit a proposal to utilize private dental offices to
harmonize dental treatment services across the new City according to the January 19, 1999
Report to the Board of Health, "Harmonization of Dental and Oral Health Services".
To date staff have shared the following documents with the ODA:
1) "Report of the Project team to Recommend Restructured Dental Services in Toronto,"
2)The ARA Report on the Management Review of the Public Health Division.
3)A list of the procedure codes and frequency from the former City of Toronto and the
procedures performed in the former City of North York program for 1997.
4) A copy of the structured survey used by the project team to gather information on
different delivery program models.
In addition the ODA was informed that Public Health is unable to provide utilization data,
cost per claim and cost per client, information the Ontario Dental Association is requesting.
These instruments are not the best method to obtain consistent, comparable cost-analyses of
six different program constructs with six different data collecting systems. The dental
treatment program information is not yet available in a consolidated form.
Comments:
Staff met with representatives of the ODA on March 3, 1999 to review the report on
Restructured Dental Services, to clarify the information contained in the report and to answer
any questions the ODA had.
The ODA was reminded that programs that the Social Services and Public Health divisions
were legally mandated to administer and deliver were not to be considered by the ODA for
harmonization. The only program that is under consideration is the dental treatment program
with a current budget of $3.6 million.
The representatives from the ODA repeatedly questioned whether the costs of the dental
treatment programs as stated in the reports were the full costs. Staff pointed out to references
in the report that stated quite clearly that the costs of corporate services such as legal,
purchasing, human resources were not included in the cost analyzes and usually did not form
part of any proposal that were being presented to Council. These costs are assumed to be
germaine to the operation of the City. The ODA was given a cost-estimate of 10% for these
services.
The ODA requested a spread sheet or a budget document with line by line details of the costs
of the dental program. It was explained to the ODA that this was not available as the six
different municipal Public Health budgets were not yet consolidated, and the level of detail
they are requesting was not readily available.
The ODA stated in the meeting that the use of RVU'S as a comparative tool was not valid. Yet
when questioned could not provide any reasons for the lack of validity in using Relative Value
Units to compare the costs of different program models. Staff further explained that the
calculations in the report on cost per RVU were done using simple mathematical operations,
and included all program costs.
The ODA was informed that their proposal should be submitted to public health staff by
March 9 so that it could be included in the report back to Budget Committee.
The following information has also been sent to the ODA since the meeting of March 3, 1999
a) A copy of the review completed by the ICEs consultant
b) A copy of the article "Oral Health and family characteristics of children attending private
or public clinics"
Conclusions:
Staff will be compiling the reports requested by the Budget Committee for the Budget
Committee meeting of March 29, 1999 and will include proposals received from stakeholders
by Tuesday, March 9, 1999. It is hoped that the ODA will submit a proposal in a timely
fashion for inclusion in the report.
Shirley Hoy, Commissioner
Community and Neighbourhood Services
Contact Name:
Dr. Hazel Stewart
Tel: (416) 392-0442
Fax. (416) 392-0713