|
|
February 2, 1999
To:Corporate Services Committee and Budget Committee
From:Chief Administrative Officer and
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
SUBJECT:EXTERNAL LEGAL FIRMS RETAINED FOR INSURANCE
CLAIM DEFENCE
Purpose:
To report on specific information relating to external legal firms retained by the City of Toronto for insurance claim
defence purposes.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
There are no funding implications relating to this report.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that this report be received as information.
Council Reference/Background/History:
At its meeting of July 29, 30 & 31, 1998, City Council referred the following motion to the Corporate Services Committee:
"BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Chief Administrative Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer be requested to
report to the October meeting of the Corporate Services Committee and the Budget Committee on:
-a list of all outstanding claims where external legal firms are retained, including all ABC's;
-a process on how firms are selected;
-the firms that are retained and annual billings by each; and
-how much has been drawn from the Insurance Reserve Fund (now total at $40.6 million) in the last five years and to
which firms, and a projection on how much would be paid in the future five years."
In a joint report (October 16, 1998) the Chief Administrative Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer reported
for information purposes to the November 9, 1998 Corporate Services Committee and the November 18, 1998 Budget
Committee that staff is in the process of compiling available insurance claims data to address City Council's motion from
its July 29, 30 & 31, 1998 meeting, as noted above.
The Corporate Services Committee received the foregoing report and requested the Chief Administrative Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, in their forthcoming report, to address the former insurance reserve fund from which
litigations such as the Jane Doe case was funded. The Budget Committee reports having requested the Chief Administrative
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to provide a further report on this matter to the Budget Committee in
January 1999.
Comments and /or Discussion and/or Justification:
City Council's July 29, 30 & 31, 1998 motion as referred to the Corporate Services Committee requested a report on four
items relating to external legal firms retained for insurance claim defence. Each of the four items is re-written below,
followed by the information requested.
Item 1
A list of all outstanding claims where external legal firms are retained, including all ABC's.
Table 1 shows that 832 open claims against the City of Toronto are being defended by fourteen different external legal
firms. The distribution of open claims among external legal firms is as follows:
Table 1
Outstanding Claims Assigned to External Legal Firms
Legal Firm |
Number of Open Claims
Assigned |
Blaney McMurtry Stapells Friedman |
1 |
Borden & Elliot |
395 |
Deacon Spears |
3 |
Forbes Chochla Aikins |
214 |
Glaholt & Associates |
1 |
Lerners & Associate |
1 |
Loopstra, Nixon & McLeish |
33 |
McCarthy Tetrault |
49 |
Paterson, MacDougall |
1 |
Reble, Ritchie, Green & Ketcheson |
115 |
Shibley Righton |
2 |
Smith Lyons |
7 |
Weir & Foulds |
10 |
Total |
832 |
The municipal defendants in these claims includes various Departments in each of the former Toronto municipalities as
well as agencies, boards and commissions which were insured under the same policy as a former municipality, i.e., CNEA,
Cityhome, Heritage Toronto, Hummingbird Centre etc. ABC's not covered here include TTC, Toronto Hydro Electric
Commission, Parking Authority of Toronto, etc.
Item 2
A process on how firms are selected
The fourteen external legal firms defending the City of Toronto were retained through a variety of processes which are
summarized in Table 2 below.
Table 2
Process of Selection of External Legal Firms
Legal Firm |
Basis of Selection |
Blaney McMurtry Stapells Friedman |
-successful proponent to proposal call by former City of Toronto Legal Dept. - entered into 3 year contract
expiring April 30, 1999. |
Borden & Elliot |
-acting on insured claims made against York, Toronto, Metro and Etobicoke. Originally the firm was retained
by Metro's insurer, then also retained by other municipal insurers, primarily always retained by insurer for
municipality. |
Deacon Spears |
-retained by the City of Toronto as a specialist in Libel & Slander cases. |
Forbes Chochla Aikins |
-introduced to City of North York by its insurer in 1981. |
Glaholt & Associates |
-retained by Metro Legal Dept. for defence of one claim. |
Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie |
-involvement prior to litigation then the firm was determined in the circumstances that they should continue
with the action. |
Lerners & Associate |
-retained by Metro Legal Dept. for defence of one claim. |
Loopstra, Nixon & McLeish |
-contracted by Borough of East York to provide all legal services including insurance defence work. |
McCarthy Tetrault |
-retained by City of Scarborough Legal Department in cooperation with the City's insurer. |
Paterson, MacDougall |
-retained by the City of Toronto and its insurer OMEX on one claim file. |
Reble, Ritchie, Green & Ketcheson |
-retained by the City of Etobicoke insurance adjusters. Adjusters would also instruct the legal firm. |
Shibley Righton |
-retained by the City of Toronto on a file by file basis. |
Smith Lyons |
-first retained in place of Borden & Elliot over a conflict regarding an Ambulance claim following which the
firm was retained on all Ambulance claims plus some Toronto Police claims. |
Weir & Foulds |
-retained upon the recommendation of the adjusting firm. |
Insurance companies offering liability policies to municipalities usually encourage some level of claim retention or
deductible to be assumed by the municipality before the insurer participates in paying the claim. Historically, when
retention levels were low, insurers required greater control over the selection of legal firms to defend claims because they
had more financial interest in the claim. Many of the external legal firms used by the City today were originally retained by
an insurance company on behalf of the municipality. Such legal firms have developed a specific expertise in the defence of
municipal insurance claims and consequently they have become a valuable asset to municipalities and municipal insurers.
External legal firms form a significant role in defending the City of Toronto's interest in insurance claims. The Chief
Financial Officer & Treasurer in consultation with Legal Services and the City Clerk's Office is currently finalizing claims
procedures which will address the assignment of required insurance claims defence to either the City's internal Legal
Services litigation solicitors or to external legal firms. The City's insurance company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company,
has confirmed their acceptance of the use of internal City solicitors to defend liability insurance claims made against the
City. Claims which are politically sensitive, involve serious bodily injury or require a particular legal expertise will be
assigned to external legal firms on the basis of matching the nature of the claim to the speciality of the legal firm. The
assignment of insurance claims for legal defence will be a function of the Finance Department's Insurance & Risk
Management Section.
Item 3
The firms that are retained and annual billings by each
Table 3
Annual Billings by Each Retained External Legal Firm
|
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
Blaney McMurtry Stapells Friedman |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1,002 |
23,108 |
23,051 |
Borden & Elliott |
1,656,796 |
1,409,949 |
1,364,949 |
1,330,530 |
1,625,473 |
1,143,330 |
Deacon Spears |
0 |
0 |
661 |
3,144 |
250 |
3,492 |
Forbes Chochla Aikins |
55,983 |
196,138 |
319,263 |
351,849 |
437,116 |
287,000 |
Glaholt & Associates |
61,370 |
131,844 |
76,566 |
24,054 |
96,801 |
26,767 |
Hicks Morley Hamilton Stewart Storie |
2,550 |
5,825 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Lerners & Associate |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
22,232 |
75,669 |
Loopstra,Nixon & McLeish |
97,690 |
160,396 |
175,646 |
114,223 |
93,571 |
157,710 |
McCarthy Tetrault |
97,147 |
125,065 |
133,761 |
143,408 |
181,697 |
166,320 |
Paterson, MacDougall |
0 |
0 |
3,902 |
14,466 |
24,970 |
4,000 |
Reble,Ritchie,Green& Ketcheson |
93,511 |
97,521 |
157,198 |
182,850 |
305,997 |
139,483 |
Shibley Righton |
536,248 |
867,188 |
49,931 |
16,040 |
15,512 |
1,345 |
Smith Lyons |
10,165 |
5,448 |
29,417 |
31,975 |
44,633 |
30,310 |
Weir & Foulds |
58,012 |
31,738 |
83,125 |
166,118 |
959,803 |
147,014 |
TOTAL |
2,669,472 |
3,031,112 |
2,394,419 |
2,379,659 |
3,831,163 |
2,205,491 |
Item 4
How much has been drawn from the insurance Reserve Fund (now total at $40.6 million) in the last five years and to
which firms, and a projection on how much would be paid in the future five years.
At its November 9, 1998 meeting, Corporate Services Committee requested that this report address the former insurance
reserve fund from which litigation such as the Jane Doe case was funded.
General liability insurance claims are funded on the basis of the date when the claim occurred, not when the claim was
made or settled. This means that insurance claims litigation concerning claims occurring in 1986, such as the Jane Doe case
(occurrence date August 24, 1986) were generally paid from an insurance reserve fund which was established during a
period of self-insurance for Toronto municipalities. The former insurance reserve fund known as the Metropolitan
Municipalities Liability Trust Account (the "MMLTA") was funded by contributions from the former Toronto
municipalities Metro (including its Boards, Agencies and the Licensing Commission), Toronto, Etobicoke, York and East
York to pay claims which exceeded a $10,000 deductible and which occurred in the years 1986, 1987 and 1988.
Consequently, three separate reserve funds were established, namely, the 1986 MMLTA, 1987 MMLTA and the 1988
MMLTA. The MMLTA funds were administered by the former Metropolitan Treasurer on behalf of the members
contributing to the funds. However, with respect to the Jane Doe case, the final settlement amount paid in 1998 was drawn
from the former Metro Insurance Reserve Fund because sufficient funds were not available from the 1986 MMLTA.
Table 4 shows the amount drawn from each of the MMLTA funds in the last five years.
Table 4
Amount Drawn From the MMLTA Funds (last 5 years)
YEAR IN WHICH
WITHDRAWAL MADE FROM
MMLTA |
AMOUNT DRAWN FROM MMLTA FUNDS |
TOTAL AMOUNT DRAWN FROM All
MMLTA Funds |
1986 MMLTA Fund |
1987 MMLTA Fund |
1988 MMLTA Fund |
1993 |
759,567 |
318,395 |
788,432 |
1,866,394 |
1994 |
209,614 |
299,915 |
931,654 |
1,441,183 |
1995 |
17,241 |
127,568 |
173,360 |
318,169 |
1996 |
72,408 |
70,454 |
202,605 |
345,468 |
1997 |
1,102,176 |
3,918 |
159,420 |
1,265,514 |
1998 |
526,265 |
0 |
168,782 |
695,047 |
TOTAL |
2,687,271 |
820,250 |
2,424,253 |
5,931,775 |
Amounts drawn from the MMLTA funds in the last five years include payments to external legal firms for insurance claims
defence, payments to claimants and consultants. Table 5 shows a summary for each external legal firm of how much has
been drawn from the MMLTA funds in the years 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 & 1998.
Table 5
Summary of Amounts Paid to External Legal Firms from the MMLTA Funds (last 5 years)
EXTERNAL LEGAL FIRM |
AMOUNT PAID FROM MMLTA FUNDS |
1986 MMLTA Fund |
1987 MMLTA Fund |
1988 MMLTA Fund |
Borden & Elliott |
66,668 |
103,244 |
830,529 |
Loopstra, Nixon & McLeish |
13,304 |
0 |
170,829 |
Reble Ritchie |
49,868 |
3,221 |
8,982 |
Shibley Righton |
0 |
54,330 |
6,761 |
Weir & Foulds |
1,587,445 |
0 |
0 |
TOTAL |
1,717,285 |
160,795 |
1,017,101 |
City Council's motion from its July 29, 30 & 31, 1998 meeting to the Corporate Services Committee makes reference to an
insurance Reserve Fund total of $40.6 million. Insurance reserve funds are established to meet the deductible provisions of
insurance policies, to provide for premiums in respect of external insurance coverage and to finance losses in excess of
external coverage. Funds to pay claims made against the former Metro municipality were available from the MMLTA funds
as indicated above and from the Metro Insurance Reserve Fund depending on the occurrence date giving rise to the claim
and anticipation of projected settlement costs. The January 1st opening balances from the MMLTA funds and the Insurance
Reserve Fund for the last five years, as indicated in Metro's Annual Financial Statements and Reports, is outlined in Table
6. Metro's Annual Financial Reports show only a combined opening balance for the three MMLTA Funds.
Table 6
Year End Balances of MMLTA Funds & Insurance Reserve Fund (last 5 years)
|
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
Metro Insurance
Reserve Fund |
27,627,000 |
27,354,000 |
22,231,000 |
21,897,000 |
20,036,000 |
24,000,000* |
MMLTA Funds (1986,
1987 & 1988) |
1,174,000 |
2,134,000 |
2,017,000 |
1,719,000 |
411,000 |
22,747* |
Total
|
28,801,000 |
29,488,000 |
24,248,000 |
23,616,000 |
20,447,000 |
24,022,747 |
* estimate
The Insurance Reserve Fund balance of $40.6 million, noted in Council's motion, arises from the April 16, 1998 Report to
the Budget Committee from the Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer on the Establishment of City Reserves and Reserve
Funds. The report provided the preliminary estimate of the accumulation of Insurance Reserve Funds from the
amalgamated seven Toronto municipalities as at January 1, 1998. This amount was created as follows:
Reserve FundPreliminary Estimate
East York insurance reserve fund33,330
Etobicoke general insurance reserve424,169
Etobicoke insurance reserve fund2,189,469
Metro insurance reserve fund20,036,460
North York insurance reserve fund10,142,434
Scarborough self insurance reserve836,205
Toronto insurance reserve614,194
Toronto public liability insurance reserve fund5,101,977
York insurance reserve2,035
York insurance reserve fund1,059,013
40,583,442
Preliminary analysis of historic claims data from the former municipalities in relation to the retention levels under the City
of Toronto's current insurance policies indicate that the City will absorb approximately $10,985,000 in claims costs
annually. In addition, payments of insurance premiums, adjusting fees, insurance broker fees and risk management
administration costs associated with loss prevention and computer system licensing will be approximately $5,061,000 for a
total annual insurance and risk management cost of $16,046,000. In conjunction with the 1999 Budget process,
determinations are being made as to the contributions necessary to meet the insurance and risk management expense
obligations of the City.
Conclusions:
Currently there are 832 outstanding claims against the City which are covered by the various liability insurance policies of
the former municipalities and have been assigned to external legal firms to defend the City's interest.
Insurance claims procedures are being prepared by the Finance Department, Insurance & Risk Management staff for
approval by the City's insurance company and City Council. The procedures will recommend the continued use of external
legal firms to defend liability claims made against the City in order to benefit from the expertise in municipal insurance
claims which is available in the legal community. Whenever possible, litigation solicitors in the City's internal Legal
Services will be assigned insurance claims defence work. Such assignment will however be governed by the nature of the
insurance claim and the availability of internal staff to accommodated such additional work loads.
A total amount of $5,931,775 was drawn in the last five years from the former insurance reserve funds known as the 1986,
1987 & 1988 MMLTA funds. Of that total, $2,895,181 was paid to external legal firms. It is projected that the
amalgamated City will pay approximately $11 million annually from an insurance reserve fund for insurance claims falling
within the City's retention. Historically, an average annual expenditure of approximately $2.8 million was paid to external
legal firms defending insurance claims against the amalgamated Toronto municipalities. It is anticipated that included
within a projected annual total retained claims cost of $11 million will be a continuing expense for external legal firms of
approximately $2.8 million. Over the next five years these figures may fluctuate depending upon changes to the City's
insurance policy deductible levels and through the promotion of risk management related loss prevention/reduction
programs for the City of Toronto.
Contact Name:
Len Brittain, Director of Treasury & Financial Services, 392-5380
E-mail: lbrittai@toronto.ca
M.R. GarrettW.A. Liczyk
Chief Administrative OfficerChief Financial Officer & Treasurer
:JM
A:\EXTLEGAL.WPD
|