June 22, 1999
To:North York Community Council
From:Joe Halstead, Commissioner Economic Development, Culture & Tourism
Subject:Proposed Heritage Designation of the Michael Shepard House ,101 Senlac Road, Lot 17, Concession 1WYS -
Under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O. 1990) - Ward 10 - North York Centre
Purpose:
The North York Heritage Committee/Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee, at its meeting of June 8,
1999, has recommended that the Michael Shepard House be designated as having architectural and historical significance
in accordance with part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O. 1990). This report is placed before the North York
Community Council for its consideration and forwarding to Toronto City Council in accordance with the recommendations
of the North York Heritage Committee/Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee.
Funding Sources, Financial Implication and Impact Statement:
Not applicable.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1)Council for the City of Toronto approve the designation of the Michael Shepard House, 101 Senlac Road, Lot 17,
Concession 1WYS - Ward 10, as a property of historical and architectural significance under part IV of the Ontario
Heritage Act (R.S.O. 1990) and in accordance with the recommendation of the North York Heritage Committee/Local
Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee; and
(2)the appropriate staff be directed to do all things necessary to give effect thereto.
Background:
The North York Heritage Committee/Local Architectural Conservation Advisory Committee, at its meeting held June 8,
1999, recommended that the Michael Shepard House, 101 Senlac Road, be designated as having architectural and historical
significance in the North York community, City of Toronto.
Built in 1859, the Michael Shepard House is constructed in the Georgian Survival style and assumes great significance in
connection with the Shepard family that settled in the historic community of Lansing at the beginning of the 19th century.
The house is also significant in association with Michael Shepard, who supported William Lyon Mackenzie's Radical
Reform party and participated in the Rebellion of 1837.
Architecturally, the massing of the house takes the form of a two storey main block with a one-and-a-half storey kitchen
wing positioned at the west rear. Incorporating a generous sense of proportion and a pleasing symmetry, the three-ranked
facade of the Michael Shepard House is generally considered to be less common among Georgian buildings in the region.
Discussion:
The Michael Shepard House has been recommended by the North York Heritage Committee/Local Architectural
Conservation Advisory Committee for designation under part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O. 1990) on
architectural and historical grounds.
When considered against the "Guidelines for the Evaluation of Heritage Properties", adopted by the former North York
City Council in 1996, the Michael Shepard House clearly qualifies for designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. A copy
of the assessment is attached as Appendix 'A'.
The "Reasons for Designation" which identify the significant historical aspects and architectural features of the Michael
Shepard House and which are proposed for the designation are attached as Appendix 'B'.
The Owner, The Mount Pleasant Group of Cemeteries, has consented to the designation of the property with conditions
relating to the issuing of development permits. The conditions have now been satisfied with the approval of all
development applications by the Planning and Building Divisions, and the designation can now proceed. A copy of the
letter from The Mount Pleasant Group of Cemeteries, addressed to the Economic Development, Culture and Tourism
Department, is attached as Appendix 'C'.
Conclusion:
The Michael Shepard House is part of the unique and special heritage of the North York community and the City of
Toronto. The property clearly qualifies for designation under the Ontario Heritage Act on both architectural and historical
grounds.
Contact Name:
Beth Hanna
Culture Division
392-5225
Joe Halstead,
Commissioner Economic Development, Culture & Tourism
Economic Development, Culture & Tourism DepartmentAPPENDIX 'A'
Heritage Section/Culture Division - North York
Heritage Property Evaluation
Based on the "Guidelines for Evaluating Heritage Properties",
adopted by North York City Council - February 1996.
Property Address:101 Senlac Road |
Ward: 10 |
Property Name: Michael Shepard House |
Historic Community: |
Lansing |
A)Architectural Significance/integrity
To be considered to be of architectural value, a building would demonstrate one or more of the following: |
StyleNotable, Rare, Unique or Early Example of An Architectural Style, Type or Convention.
The Michael Shepard House is constructed as a Late Georgian, or alternatively labelled, Georgian Survival building. It
also shows the influence of other buildings styles which appeared in Ontario during the 19th century such as the
NeoClassical and picturesque styles. The Georgian style prevailed throughout the years of 1784 - 1860 in Ontario. It is
primarily recognized by ordered facade arrangements, based on prescribed rules of geometry, symmetry and proportion.
Facade elements, such as windows, are usually distributed in a formal manner in order to achieve an equal balance of parts
on either side of a central doorway, or frontispiece.
The NeoClassical style (which appeared in the United States as the American Federal Style and in Britain as the Adam
Style) appeared in Ontario between the years 1800 - 1860. In general, the style carries a lighter and more refined
appearance than its Georgian counterpart. The influence of NeoClassical architecture on the Michael Shepard House
manifests itself at several key points: the windows are multi-pane sash with large apertures and thin glazing bars; gable
ends feature quarter-round apertures and eave returns, and the entrance of the house once featured a transom spanning a
single door and two sidelights on either side.
ConstructionNotable, Rare, Unique or Early Example of A Particular Material or Method of Construction.
The construction of the Michael Shepard House is fairly typical of 19th century brick buildings in Ontario. Although
concealed behind contemporary materials, the basement is constructed from fieldstone foundations and the exterior walls
are composed of loadbearing masonry measuring 4 wythes in thickness. The only original framing left within the structure
is located within the floors, some of the partitions at the second storey level and within the roof.
ArchitectDesigned or Built by An Architect or Builder Who Has Made A Significant Contribution To The Community,
Province or Nation.
Unknown, but similarities to the Jacob and Sarah Stong House (1854) and other houses in the area indicate that the
construction of the Michael Shepard house was probably based on stock plans and/or 19th century pattern books.
DesignAttractive or Unique Because of Its Overall Excellence, Artistic Merit or Uniqueness of Design, Composition,
Craftsmanship or Details.
The massing of the Michael Shepard House takes the form of a two-storey, rectangular block with a one-and-a-half storey
kitchen wing positioned at the west rear. Both the house and its kitchen wing feature Cedar shake, gable configured roofs
of modest pitch. Incorporating a generous sense of proportion and a pleasing symmetry, the three-ranked facade of the
Michael Shepard House is generally considered to be less common among Georgian buildings in the region. All elevations
incorporate symmetrically placed, multi-pane, six-over-six, sash windows with thin, NeoClassically influenced glazing
bars.
Significant features of the house include: the wooden roof eaves (consisting of over-extended boxed soffit/fascia, frieze
board and mouldings) articulated by curvilinear brackets on all elevations inclusive of cornice/eave returns; the paired
double-stack chimney flues at the gable ends which feature corbeled and chamferred brick detailing; the prostyle wooden
portico (not an original element, but an alteration worthy of preserving) with distyle (paired) Tuscan columns supporting a
generous entablature; and the paired, NeoClassically styled, quarter-round apertures located within the attic storey of the
gable ends (concealed by wooden louvered vents). The use of dichromatic brickwork on the exterior is a significant feature
of the Michael Shepard House. On all elevations, buff coloured brick plays an important role in highlighting structural
elements such as jack-arched lintels, belt courses, corner quoins, friezes, and the plinth. Although concealed by
contemporary building materials, the basement of the Michael Shepard House is constructed from fieldstone foundations.
SiteOccupies Its Original Site.
The Michael Shepard House occupies its original site.
AlterationsRetains Most of Its Original Materials and Design Features; Has Had Little Alteration.
Having survived for more than 140 years, the Michael Shepard House is remarkably intact from the exterior. There has
been some alteration of exteriors, i.e. the original front entrance was modified with the addition of contemporary doors and
a wooden portico. Also, the original wooden sills have been replaced with brick sills. The window shutters are not original
elements and are purely decorative, although they are appropriate to the size of the window openings. There has also been
some inappropriate repointing of exterior walls (i.e. kitchen wing west wall) with cementitious mortars.
Conversely, the kitchen wing has been modified several times during the course of its life with the reconfiguration of its
windows - first to allow for conversion of the wing into a two-car garage in the 1940s and then adaptation into washroom
facilities and support spaces. The most recent changes occurred in 1993 when the interior of the ground floor was radically
altered and the kitchen wing was renovated to contain new washrooms, a large hall, display area and offices above.
ConditionGood Structural Condition
Not determined.
B)HISTORICAL IMPORTANCE
A building could be deemed to be of historical significance if one or more of the following conditions were met: |
AgeComparatively Old Within The Context of The Area.
The Michael Shepard House was built in 1859, at a time period when many farmers in Upper Canada improved their barns
and upgraded to larger houses. Buildings of similar construction date in the area include: the David Gibson House (1851);
Joseph Shepard I House/Dempsey Brothers Store (1860) and the Joseph Shepard II House (1835).
Other building types in the North York Commercial Centre area consist of commercial, recreational, cultural and
residential buildings, most of which were constructed in the last quarter of this century.
Person(s)Associated With A Person Who Made A Significant Contribution To The Community, Province or Nation.
As a resident of Lansing, Michael Shepard was involved in farming and the operation of the family's milling business. He
also operated his own mill at Oriole prior to building his Georgian home on Lot 17, Concession 1WYS in 1859.
EventAssociated With An Event or Movement of Local, Provincial or National Significance.
The historical significance of this former residence is derived in part from Michael Shepard's participation in the Rebellion
of 1837 and his escape from a Kingston penitentiary. Michael Shepard's father, Joseph Shepard Sr., was a close friend and
supporter of William Lyon Mackenzie, who led the radical wing of the Reform Party. After Joseph's death in 1837,
Michael and his three brothers - Thomas, Joseph Jr., and Jacob, supported Mackenzie and the Reform Party's endeavors to
seize the City of Toronto.
At the time of the Rebellion, Michael along with his brother Thomas and other men were sent to attack Tory troops who
had been guarding the Don Bridge on King Street, Toronto. After confrontation there, they fled to avoid capture, but were
found at Silverthorne's farm near the Humber River and then incarcerated in a Toronto Jail. Without receiving any trial,
Michael and Thomas were sent to Kingston to await exile to Van Dieman's land in Australia, but managed to escape with
other Reform Radicals from the penitentiary. They eventually crossed the American border where they were received by
anti-British Americans and then safely escorted to Lewiston. After spending three years in the United States, Michael and
Thomas Shepard learned that they had been pardoned by the Canadian government. Subsequently, they returned to Canada
in 1843 to rejoin their families.
CommunityAssociated With The History or Development of An Area. (This Would Include Early
Development Structures Such As Farm And Village Houses or Churches).
In terms of community development, the Michael Shepard House is implicitly connected to the historical community of
Lansing which was centred at today's Yonge Street and Sheppard Avenue, and to a lesser degree the community of
Willowdale which was located at the cross-roads of today's Park Home Avenue and Yonge Street.
In addition to operating farms in the area, the Shepard family also owned a number of mills which supplied lumber and
flour locally and to places across Canada. In 1824, Thomas Shepard built the Golden Lion Inn on the south-west corner of
Yonge & Sheppard. Several decades later, Joseph Shepard II constructed a large 2-1/2 storey Georgian style building on the
north-west corner of that same intersection. This structure, which combined mercantile and residential uses, became the
focus of the Lansing community during the 19th century. Throughout the 20th century, it earned the reputation of being
North York's most famous hardware store. This building was the Dempsey Brothers Store which operated until the late
1980s. The store has since been relocated from its original site and forms a part of a public park on Beecroft Road. In 1996,
it was restored and rehabilitated for use as a public archival facility by the former City of North York.
Another structure which stills stands as a reminder of the Shepard family legacy was built in 1835 and is located at No. 90
Burndale Avenue. This residence is the earliest of the family homes to survive and was built by Joseph Shepard Sr.
ContextAble To Illustrate Broad Patterns of Cultural, Social, Political, Military, Economic or Agricultural History.
The Michael Shepard House, in addition to other 19th century houses that survive in the area, is symbolic of North York's
rural heritage and early settlement. The house, with its original barn(s)[demolished], outbuildings and agricultural lands
were typical in the way that large farms were developed and cultivated during the 19th to mid-20th century. See also
"Community Development".
ArchaeologySite Is Known or Thought To Be The Location of Archaeological Remains.
Unknown. However, because the property has been largely undeveloped, it may contain archaeological resources related to
the occupation of the Shepard family, i.e. artifacts related to cultivation and farming of the lands.
C)Contextual Importance -
A structure is considered to have contextual importance if one or more of the following apply: |
ContinuityContributes To The Continuity or Character of The Street or Neighbourhood.
The Michael Shepard House is remotely located from other buildings (i.e. commercial, cultural and recreational) that make
up the North York Commercial Centre . The house is also at some distance from nearby residential buildings developed as
subdivision housing between the years 1920 - 1950.
LandmarkA Prominent or Conspicuous Structure That Has Visual or Sentimental Value for The Community.
Standing near the centre of the York Cemetery property, the Michael Shepard House is symbolic of the rural heritage of the
North York and occupies a prominent position on the York Cemetery lands. At one time, the house faced Yonge Street, but
urban intensification and development of the area has altered its visibility from Yonge Street.
SettingContributes To The Identity of A Community or Landscape.
The Michael Shepard House is elevated on a raised site and is greatly enhanced by open space on its east, south and north
sides. The house together with its lands (now developed as open space/cemetery use) provide an important understanding
of the original farm property and considerable insight into the rural character of the area.
EVALUATED BY:_________________________________________________________________________________Steven Bell
Architectural Historian
June 1, 1999
G:\GB\20\AGENDA\JULY15\SHEP.HSE