November 10, 1999
To: Policy and Finance Committee
From: Josephine Bryant
Subject: Reinvesting in our Future: The Toronto Public Library Branch Planning Study - Status Report
Purpose:
To provide the Policy and Finance Committee with a summary of the report, Reinvesting In Our Future: The Toronto
Public Library Branch Planning Study, and an update on the current status of the report as requested by the Policy and
Finance Committee earlier this year.
Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
If all phases of the plan were implemented as identified in the report, there are both operating and capital budget
implications.
The capital investment required over the ten-year period identified in the report is a total of $40,003,000, of which
$31,768,000 is currently reflected in the Library's proposed Ten-Year Capital Plan.
The net operating budget savings at the end of the ten-year period are $1,042,000 annually. However, these savings do not
include the increased operating costs for the proposed St. James Town branch or two potential additional branches
(Scarborough City Centre, Harbourfront/Railway Lands).
Recommendations:
It is recommended that this report be received for information.
Background:
Toronto Public Library was requested to report to the Policy and Finance Committee this fall on a review of its branch
locations, considering the potential to reduce the number of library facilities based on usage, and the impact of
amalgamation on border branches:
That the City Librarian provide the requested report pertaining to potential library closures to the Finance and Priorities
Committee no later than September 1999. (Notices of Motions, as adopted by the Council of the City of Toronto at its
meeting held on April 26, 27, and 28, 1999.)
The branch review was also part of an overall framework to address service harmonization and support the Library's
service planning.
A full report, recommending a ten-year plan with three phases, was submitted to the Toronto Public Library Board at its
meeting on September 21, 1999. The Board received the report, but did not adopt its recommendations for Phase I, pending
consultation with library users in a number of communities. Staff were asked to report back to the Board on the results of
these Phase I consultations in January 2000. A full copy of the report has been sent to all Councillors.
Comments:
With an extensive branch network and an aging facilities infrastructure, the Library Board faces challenges in maintaining
a vibrant library system that is well positioned to provide the combination of new and traditional services that the citizens
of Toronto expect. The comparative analysis contained in the study indicates that the Toronto Public Library provides more
"branch infrastructure" to its population than any other major North American library system. Conversely, the collection
size and the hours of service offered at branches are lower than the average for comparable Canadian libraries. This
infrastructure is the product of over 100 years of development and reflects the historical evolution of library services in the
predecessor systems. Amalgamation presents an opportunity to take a fresh look at the Toronto Public Library system in its
entirety, and identify how branches can build and contribute to an effective and efficient library network.
The study included all of the 98 branches of the Toronto Public Library. Library space available to residents, measured in
square feet of library building per capital, was evaluated. There was also an examination of whether there was service area
overlap between branches as defined by a 1.6 km service radius around each branch. In addition, branches were evaluated
on facility condition, including the size of the branch, and the activity levels at each branch as measured by circulation and
in-library use of materials, visits to the branch, reference questions answered and programs attended. Other data, including
socio-economic and demographic data was collected. This analysis resulted in an identification of specific areas of the city
where potential service change might be warranted. Proposed service changes were identified for each of these areas and
evaluated based on the impact on cost, service levels and service equity. These service changes have substantial impacts on
facility planning and require a capital investment, and a phased approach was proposed which allows for a planned capital
program as well as extensive community consultation. The following table provides a summary of the proposed service
changes by area:
Areas for Proposed Service Changes
Summary Table
Area |
Description of Proposal |
South Etobicoke |
Expand Brentwood (Phase 2); Consolidate Humber Bay and Mimico into a new
neighbourhood library at Park Lawn and Lakeshore (Phase 3). |
York/West Toronto |
Expand Bloor Gladstone (Phase 2); Rebuild Maria A. Shchuka (Phase 2); Refurbish
Dufferin St. Clair (Phase 2); Close St. Clair Silverthorn and Davenport (Phase 2). |
High Park |
Close Swansea (Phase 1) |
Downtown Toronto |
Do not reopen Niagara (Phase 1); Build a neighbourhood library at St. James Town
(Phase 2); Continue to assess the need for a neighbourhood library to serve St.
Lawrence, the port lands, the railway lands, and Harbourfront (Phase 3). |
East Toronto/East York |
Close Todmorden Room (Phase 1); Expand Pape Danforth (Phase 2); Expand Jones
(Phase 2); Close Queen Saulter (Phase 2). |
South Central Scarborough |
Expand Cliffcrest (Phase 3) |
North York Scarborough Border |
Expand McGregor Park (Phase 2); Consolidate Maryvale and Victoria Village at
Victoria Park & Lawrence (Phase 3); Continue to assess the need for a neighbourhood
library at Scarborough City Centre (Phase 3). |
North Toronto |
Close Mt. Pleasant (Phase 2) |
North Etobicoke |
Close Northern Elms (Phase 2) |
Time Frame |
Phase 1 (2000) Phase 2 ( 2000-2004) Phase 3 (beyond 2004) |
If all phases of the plan outlined in the study were implemented, the overall branch infrastructure would be reduced by
approximately ten percent (ie. from 98 branches to between 89 and 91 branches, depending on future development).
However, the report also recommends a significant capital investment in branches to address service deficiencies at both
the district and neighbourhood branches in order to realize an effective branch network which provides attractive and vital
branch library service to the citizens of Toronto.
The Toronto Public Library Board has directed staff to proceed with community consultation. Consultation plans are
currently being confirmed in consultation with local councillors. The Board has requested a report on the results of these
consultations for the Phase One branches by January 2000.
Conclusions:
The final results of the branch report will be refined and revised based on public consultation and the capital budget
approved for the Toronto Public Library. Future capital and operating budgets will incorporate these results.
Contact:
Jane Pyper, Director, Service Planning and Support, Tel: 395-5602, Fax: 395-5542, Email: jpyper@tpl.toronto.on.ca
City Librarian
List of Attachments:
N/A