May 12, 1999
To:Scarborough Community Council
From:H.W.O. Doyle
Subject:Ontario Municipal Board Decision
Eid Attia, the Highland Creek Highway Commercial Association
and Abel Van Wyk
Appeal of City-initiated OPA 988
Purpose:
The purpose of this report is to advise of the outcome of the Ontario Municipal Board (the "Board") Hearing held with
respect to Official Plan Amendment 988, a modification to the Highland Creek Secondary Plan.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
There are no financial implications.
Recommendations:
For information only.
Council Reference/Background/History:
In 1998 Council approved a package of amendments to the Highland Creek Secondary Plan in the form of OPA 988. This
amendment recognized the low density, single family nature of the secondary plan area but sought to make some minor
changes regarding use and density. The amendment was appealed by several objectors who felt that the amendment would
have a negative impact on them including Eid Attia, Abel Van Wyk and the Highland Creek Highway Commercial
Association. The hearing was held over a 3 week period commencing on February 1, 1999.
At the outset of the hearing the University of Toronto sought to become involved by introducing its own private
amendment which it argued was a "modification" to OPA 988. The City objected to this late introduction of new material
and sought a deferral of the matter until the fall of 1999. The Board Chair imposed a compromise between the two
positions and scheduled the University of Toronto matter for May 31, 1999 for 2 weeks. See page 2 of the decision
attached.
Although the Ontario Municipal Board approved the majority of OPA 988 as representing good planning, including the
higher density provisions for the Zapfe Holdings Inc. lands, the Board struck down two sections of OPA 988 as adopted by
Council. Firstly the Board did not agree that it was appropriate to delete certain uses from the existing Highway
Commercial permission along Kingston Road including Hotels/Motels/Restaurants and Funeral Homes and therefore
concluded that all existing Highway Commercial uses should remain. Secondly the Board did not accept the City's
evidence that the Attia lands on the southeast corner of Kingston Road and Morningside Avenue should remain as low
density residential with no permission for townhouses or semis and therefore permitted Mr. Attia's application for 14
townhouses and/or semidetached units subject to a suitable site plan layout. The decision is attached for the information of
Council.
Contact Name:
Brendan O'Callaghan, Solicitor
Planning & Administrative Tribunal Law
Tel: (416) 392-7786
Fax: (416) 392-0005
H.W.O. Doyle
City Solicitor
Legal Services