March 10, 1999
To:Chairman and Members of the Scarborough Community Council
From:Gary H. Welsh, Director, Transportation Services, Works and Emergency Services, District 4
Subject:Request for an All-Way Stop Control on Centennial Road at Conference Boulevard/Clemes Drive, Scarborough
Highland Creek
Purpose:
To report on the results of the all-way stop control warrant studies conducted at the intersection of Centennial Road and
Conference Boulevard/Clemes Drive.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
Not Applicable.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that this report be received for information.
Council Reference/Background/History:
At the request of Councillor Moeser, Transportation Services is reporting the results of our investigation of an all-way stop
control at the intersection of Centennial Road and Conference Boulevard/Clemes Drive.
Comments and/or Discussion and/or Justification:
The intersection of Centennial Road and Conference Boulevard/Clemes Drive is located in the residential community north
of Lawrence Avenue, between Meadowvale Road and Port Union Road. All three of these roads are considered collector
roads. St. Brendan Catholic School is located immediately north of this intersection and a pedestrian crossover (PXO)
exists north of the school, approximately 200 metres north of Conference Boulevard/Clemes Drive.
Pedestrian Crossing Activity:
During the peak eight hours of normal weekday, approximately 148 pedestrians cross Centennial Road at Clemes
Drive/Conference Boulevard. The age groups of the 148 pedestrians are listed in the following table:
Types of Pedestrians |
Number of Pedestrians |
Assisted Children |
12 |
Unassisted Children |
45 |
Youths / Adults |
86 |
Senior Citizens |
5 |
Physically Disabled |
0 |
(Assisted Children are children crossing the road accompanied by a youth, an adult or a senior citizen)
A total of 53 crossing movements were recorded of school children crossing Centennial Road at this location on their way
to and from St. Brendan Catholic School. The majority of pedestrians recorded crossing Centennial Road at this location
during the eight hour study were students from Sir Oliver Mowat C.I. on Lawrence Avenue at Charlottetown Boulevard.
Crossings take place at the aforementioned PXO, as well as at Clemes Drive/Conference Boulevard, without the assistance
of a crossing guard. Staff did not observe any conflicts between pedestrians crossing Centennial Road and vehicular traffic.
Collision History:
A review of the collision history for the period from January 1, 1995 to May 31, 1998 reveals two collisions have occurred
at the subject intersection during this period. Neither of these collisions involved pedestrians although both were
considered traffic control signal preventable. This collision history is not indicative of a safety hazard.
All-Way Stop Control:
The justification for the installation of an all-way stop control is based on a technical warrant established by the Ministry of
Transportation of Ontario (MTO), and adopted as the City Policy by the former Scarborough Council.
Traffic studies conducted on Wednesday, February 3, 1999 produced the following results which illustrate that the
Warrant's requirements for a collector road are not satisfied:
Study Period |
Total Approach
Vehicle Volume |
Vehicle Volume Split
Major/Minor Roads |
Vehicle/Pedestrian
Volume From Minor Road |
0700 - 0800 |
350 |
61/39 |
140 |
0800 - 0900* |
546 |
59/41 |
242 |
1100 - 1200 |
263 |
67/33 |
92 |
1200 - 1300 |
292 |
64/36 |
113 |
1300 - 1400 |
206 |
69/31 |
67 |
1500 - 1600 |
393 |
66/34 |
150 |
1600 - 1700 |
354 |
69/31 |
113 |
1700 - 1800 |
416 |
77/23 |
96 |
MTO Requirements
For Each Hour |
$ 500 |
$ 70/30 |
$ 200 |
As illustrated in the above table, the minimum requirements are fulfilled in one hour (*) while the full warrant requires
fulfillment of the minimum requirements in all eight hours.
In addition to the Warrant, the following outlines the main reasons why the installation of unwarranted all-way stop
controls are not recommended:
(i)Most motorists are reasonable and prudent with no intention of maliciously violating traffic regulations. However,
when an unreasonable restriction is imposed (such as an unwarranted all-way stop control) it can result in flagrant
violations. In such cases, pedestrians may start to cross the road with a false sense of security, and conflict with a motorist
approaching the stop sign without expecting to stop. This will obviously place the pedestrian at risk.
(ii)The aforementioned pedestrian hazard is more severe for children, who are more likely to misjudge approaching
traffic.
(iii)Unwarranted stop signs often result in an increase in speeds by motorists who try to make up lost time for what they
perceive as unnecessary delays.
(iv)The City has an obligation to provide services in an environmentally conscious manner. The installation of
unwarranted stop controls not only undermines the Warrant but contributes to unnecessary fuel consumption and higher
levels of noise and air pollution. These pollutants most specifically impact those residents in the immediate vicinity of the
intersection.
Traffic Control Signals:
Study results were also applied to the Traffic Control Signal Warrant at this intersection. The justification for the
installation of traffic control signals is based on a technical warrant established by the MTO. The analysis of this warrant is
based on data compiled from an 8-hour traffic study. Traffic studies conducted on Wednesday, February 3, 1999 produced
the following results which illustrate that the Warrant's requirements are not satisfied:
MTO - TCS Warrant |
Compliance Level |
Minimum Vehicular Volume |
49% |
Delay to Cross Traffic |
34% |
To warrant the installation of traffic control signals, compliance levels of 100% are required in one of the above categories
or 80% in each.
In brief, these findings indicate that there is insufficient vehicular and pedestrian traffic crossing the intersection to satisfy
the Warrant. The volumes at this intersection have decreased slightly from a previous study conducted on Wednesday,
January 14, 1998.
Pedestrian Crossover:
Study results were also applied to the Pedestrian Crossover Warrant producing the following results:
MTO - PXO Warrant |
Required Volume |
Recorded Volume |
Compliance |
Adjusted
Pedestrian Volume |
926 |
198 |
21%
|
Pedestrian Delays
Greater Than 10 Seconds |
75 |
31 |
41% |
To warrant the installation of a pedestrian crossover, compliance levels of 100% are required in both of the above
categories.
Conclusions:
In summary, our traffic studies reveal that an all-way stop control, traffic control signals and a pedestrian crossover are not
warranted at the intersection of Centennial Road and Conference Boulevard/Clemes Drive. Based on the study results, this
intersection is operating safely with the existing controls.
Contact Name:
Bruce Clayton
Supervisor, Traffic Engineering, Works and Emergency Services
Telephone: 396-7844
Fax: 396-5681
E-mail: clayton@city.scarborough.on.ca
Gary H. Welsh
Director
Transportation Services
Works and Emergency Services
District 4
BDC:ca
c:\work\wpwork\reports\centen.wpd
D98-286