May 25, 1999
To:Toronto Community Council
From:Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services
Subject:Rezoning of the lands within and abutting the Nordheimer Ravine and currently covered by Interim Control
By-law 318-1998 (Ward 23 - Midtown)
Purpose:
This report recommends that the lands in and within 10 metres of the Nordheimer Ravine be subject to a restrictive
exception which would implement a "Ravine Impact Area". The line defining the "Ravine Impact Area" would be
consistent with the current line defining the boundary of the Nordheimer Ravine. Such a regulation would:
(i)be consistent with the environmental policies of the Official Plan;
(ii)be complementary to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's fill and top-of-bank regulations;
(iii)have appropriate regard for the relevant policies of the Provincial Policy Statement regarding significant valley lands;
and
(iv)be consistent with the policies enacted for the lands generally abutting the Park Drive Ravine.
This report is based on the findings of the study approved by Council of the former City of Toronto pertaining to the Park
Drive Ravine which found that privately held ravine lands can contribute to the sustainability and diversity of the ravine as
long as an appropriate mechanism is in place to regulate the position of buildings and related development on any given
lot. The adoption of the recommended regulations will ensure that such a mechanism is in place respecting the lands
abutting the entire Nordheimer Ravine.
Financial Implications:
There are no requirements for any municipal expenditure associated with this approval.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
1.City Council amend Section 12(2) RESTRICTIVE EXCEPTIONS of the Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the
former City of Toronto by:
(a) adding a "Ravine Impact Area" and stating that no person shall, on a lot which is located wholly or partially within 10
metres of the Ravine Impact Area of the Nordheimer Ravine, or within the Nordheimer Ravine, use or erect a building,
structure or an addition for any purpose, other than those required for flood and/or erosion protection or those related to
federal, provincial or municipal infrastructure, unless the building, structure or addition is set back 10 metres from the
Ravine Impact Area, except that:
(i)an addition can be made to a building or structure existing at the time of the passing of this by-law that is within 10
metres of the Ravine Impact Area, provided the proposed addition is no closer to the Ravine than any existing wall of the
existing building or structure; and
(ii)any building or structure existing within 10 metres of the Ravine Impact Area at the time of the passing of this by-law
may be replaced, provided that the replacement building or structure does not have any greater floor area or height and is in
the same position relative to the lot lines as the building or structure it replaces; and
2.the City Solicitor be authorized to prepare and submit to Council the necessary by-laws.
Council Reference/Background/History:
In accordance with the recommendations of Clause 7 of the Land Use Committee Report 10, adopted by Council of the
former City of Toronto on July 14, 1997, I was requested to report back on a process and timetable for developing "Ravine
Impact Boundaries" for ravine areas throughout the former City of Toronto. In this Department's report, also of July 14,
1997, respecting the Nordheimer Ravine, I advised that I would begin the requested study by reviewing the issues
pertaining to the lands abutting the Nordheimer Ravine. At that time, it was also stated that the study would be limited
initially to this ravine due to the constraints of staff resources and the priorities related to questions associated with the
relationship of the top-of-bank to the defined ravine limit and known development activity within this area, particularly the
then proposed construction of four houses on Glen Edyth Drive.
On July 14, 1997, the Council for the former City of Toronto adopted By-law No. 1997-0371 (see Map 1) which had the
effect of prohibiting for a period of one year, the erection of any building or structure within 10 metres of the Nordheimer
Ravine. Subsequently, at its meeting on June 3 and 4, 1998, Council of the City of Toronto adopted By-law No. 318-1998
which served to extend the Interim Control By-law applying to these lands for a further period of one year.
Comments:
1. Location
The ravine is generally located to the southeast of the intersection of St. Clair Avenue West and Bathurst Street and runs to
the southeast almost to Davenport Road at Poplar Plains Road.
2.Planning Considerations
2.1Background
City Council of the former City of Toronto adopted the Interim Control By-law for the Nordheimer Ravine (By-law
1997-0371) at the same meeting as it adopted the amendments to By-law 438-86 imposing a Ravine Impact Boundary (or
Area) for the lands abutting the Park Drive Ravine. The amendments to By-law 438-86 for the Park Drive Ravine imposed
restrictions on the use and development of the lands generally within the first 10 metres from the boundary of the Park
Drive Ravine and within the ravine. Subsequent appeals pertaining to two specific properties which were also dealt with in
this report continue to be the subject of ongoing appeals involving the City and the property owners. However, it should be
noted that the By-law was approved by the Ontario Municipal Board as it applied to the balance of the approximately 170
properties affected by this change to the By-law.
At the time of the passing of the Interim Control By-law for the lands abutting the Nordheimer Ravine, I noted in my report
that there were active building permit applications to allow the construction of 4 new homes on lots now known as Nos.
11, 15, 17, and 19 Glen Edyth Drive. Three of these new houses have now been completed on lands immediately abutting
the ravine. The construction of these houses has resulted in significant negative impact on the slopes and vegetation
abutting the ravine. The proposed revisions to the Zoning By-law would have restricted the issuance of building permits for
the construction of these houses had the amendments been in place prior to the applications for these building permits.
2.2Character of the Ravine
Toronto's ravines are one of the most significant physical features of the City and were important in determining the
structure of the City. They continue to play an important role within the City as part of the ecosystem, as a major feature of
the drainage system within the City and as areas of natural amenity and recreation. During the development of the City,
roads generally bypassed the ravines, streams were allowed to continue to run through them and development generally
was not undertaken within the ravines. Today, however, quality urban land is scarce and due to their amenity, lots abutting
or within the ravines are highly marketable for residential development. These characteristics, coupled with current
engineering techniques which can overcome many of the physical constraints to building on, or adjacent to, steep slopes,
make the ravines more vulnerable to development.
The Nordheimer Ravine terminates at its southern end at the former shoreline of glacial Lake Iroquois. Consequently, the
steepness of the ravine slopes diminishes towards the Davenport Road end of the ravine and there is significant residential
development in this area. The original streambed within the ravine has long been buried and is no longer visible as it
traverses eastwards towards what is now known as the Rosedale Valley Ravine and into the Don River. More recently, the
natural water seepage from the ravine slopes has been captured in two wetland areas. A program also has been undertaken
by the City to introduce and protect existing native vegetation within these wetland areas and on the abutting slopes.
The vegetation of the ravines plays an important role in absorbing carbon dioxide and improving air quality. In addition,
the vegetation within the ravines absorbs significant amounts of urban noise, giving the surrounding areas a sense of calm
and quietness. This is especially evident at the bottom of the ravines where steep ravine walls create a natural barrier to
urban sounds. This noise buffering capability is eroded as development encroaches into the ravines and development starts
to generate its own sounds.
In general, it is estimated that while the majority of the plant species documented in the Nordheimer Ravine are native to
the area, there are significant intrusions of Manitoba maple, Norway maple, Siberian elm and other non-native species
which tend to reduce the biodiversity and the richness of the overall species mix. A large portion of the ravine bottom has
been cleared over the years as a result of various construction activities, including the construction of the TTC subway.
However, as further development encroaches into the ravine, there is greater potential for slope failure, erosion of topsoils,
the introduction of retaining walls and the replacement of native species with invasive species. The loss of natural
vegetation in the ravine also has a significant negative impact on wildlife habitat.
2.3Erosion Control and Protection at the Top-of-Bank
The encroachment of development close to the top-of-bank has historically led to problems with erosion. The causes of
such erosion can be traced to increased runoff, dumping of garden refuse on the ravine slopes with the resulting destruction
of existing vegetation, and increased pedestrian traffic on the ravine slopes. As well, some erosion occurs around the bases
of bridges and along retaining walls built to extend rear yards abutting the ravine.
If this area were being subdivided today (rather than in the early part of the 1900's), in accordance with principles of sound
ecological planning and best management practices, it would be likely that development would not be permitted so close to
the top-of-bank, nor would the lower areas of Russell Hill Road or Glen Edyth Drive have been allowed to encroach into
the original landform of the ravine. More likely, a buffer zone would have been required that would provide effective
protection of the forest edge from the effects of wind and sun exposure, as well as to protect against undue loading of the
top-of- bank and diversion of ground water. Due to the age of the development in the area, however, this level of protection
and stewardship has not generally been practised. This has left this ravine subject to considerable urban stress similar to
many other ravines within the City.
2.4 Urban Structure
The Nordheimer Ravine plays a significant role in the network of ravines within the City and is the southerly extension of
the Cedarvale Ravine running north from Tichester Road. It was also originally connected to the Park Drive Ravine to the
southeast, but the natural character of this connection has been lost due to landfill and the development of the city.
However, the ravine remains an important natural open space and landscape within the urban environment and
significantly adds to the quality of urban life.
The ravine also provides a significant recreational resource for jogging, walking, cycling, tobogganing and other passive
recreational activities. In most cases, the existing residential dwellings on top of the ravine slopes are set back a reasonable
distance and masked by substantial vegetation. Such setbacks help to ensure that the scenic quality of the ravine is
maintained, as well as the stability of the ravine slopes.
The Official Plan addresses the issues of managing and preserving our natural heritage and ravine resources. As these
resources are limited within the context of urban life and vulnerable, it is appropriate that land management practices and
responsible land stewardship should be practised systematically to sustain the ravine system for future generations.
2.5 Current Processes for Regulating Development
Development regulation is the primary function of the General Zoning By-law 438-86 and other site-specific by-laws.
These by-laws serve to implement the policies of the Official Plan. Development within any defined ravine area is also
subject to Ravine Control (as defined in Chapter 276. Ravines of the former City of Toronto's Municipal Code) and Site
Plan Approval.
These regulatory mechanisms are generally legislated through the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act which gives
the City certain additional legislative authority to regulate specific matters not defined within the Planning Act. Ravine
preservation is one such matter. The Municipal Code consolidates many of the specific by-laws/processes which may affect
an application for development. Other relevant policies are contained in the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
policies, the former Metropolitan Toronto Official Plan and in the Provincial Policy Statement.
(a)Provincial Policy Statement
The Provincial Policy Statement came into effect on May 22, 1996. Ravines are not specifically defined in the Provincial
Policy Statement, but significant valley lands are classified as Natural Heritage features.
The Provincial Policy Statement (Policy 2.3) recognizes all valley lands within the area including Toronto as significant, as
they may constitute the only remaining natural areas in the municipality. As such, these valley lands can form the basis for
a natural heritage system within the planning area. The Provincial Policy Statement also suggests the provision of a 50
metre buffer for significant valley lands. The 10 metre buffer recommended by this report is a compromise between that
recommended in the Provincial Policy Statement and the current reality of no required buffer.
(b)Metropolitan Toronto Official Plan
The Nordheimer Ravine is within the Metropolitan Green Space System identified in the former Metropolitan Toronto's
Official Plan (Metroplan). The objective of designating the Metropolitan Green Space System in Metroplan is to plan and
manage this system and abutting lands in a way that protects and rehabilitates the integrity of the natural features and
ecological functions, improves physical connections to other green spaces, meets recreational and leisure needs of the
Toronto population, and enhances the form of the City.
The policies in Metroplan seek to achieve the Metropolitan Green Space System through, among other things, participation
in initiatives for the protection and regeneration of significant natural areas. Significant natural areas include, but are not
limited to, sensitive and ecologically fragile areas and aquatic systems, and terrestrial habitats, as identified by the
Province, the TRCA and/or a Municipality. Such areas may include: ravines, wetlands, wood lots, environmentally
significant areas, areas of natural and scientific interest, valley land impact zones, environmental impact zones and
waterfront impact zones.
The policies in Metroplan also state that no new buildings or structures, other than replacements, minor extensions or
accessory structures are to be permitted within ravines or within a minimum of 10 metres from the edge of significant
natural areas, where these extend beyond the ravine slopes; except where the Area Municipality is satisfied, after
consulting with Metro and the TRCA, that the proposal does not detract from the objectives of the Plan and is in
accordance with policies in Metroplan.
(c)City of Toronto Official Plan
The current policies of the Official Plan respecting Ravines and Open Space areas have evolved over a long period of time.
Starting in 1960 with the Natural Parklands report, policies respecting the preservation of open space and the ravine
systems have increasingly provided greater protection for the preservation of the natural environment. In 1983, Council of
the former City of Toronto adopted Official Plan Amendment 228 by By-law 344-83, designating the lands within the
Nordheimer Ravine as a Ravine. The delineation of the boundaries of the ravine were incorporated in Appendix 'A'
(Ravine Maps) of the Plan.
The current Official Plan (Cityplan) for the former City of Toronto modified the previous Open space designation by
splitting it into three classifications - Open Space, Natural Areas and Environmentally Significant Areas. The Nordheimer
Ravine is designated as a Natural Area and Ravine. Policies with respect to Ravines and Natural Areas are found in Section
2 of the Plan, while Parks and Open Space policies are located in Section 4.
The policies generally stated throughout Section 2.3 of the Plan direct Council to protect and enhance Natural Areas,
Environmentally Significant Areas, Ravines and the natural Lake Ontario shoreline. Section 2.4 of the Plan further deals
with issues pertaining to development in and abutting ravines and sets criteria for review if development is proposed within
the ravine areas. More specifically Section 2.48 of the plan recognizes that development adjacent to ravines has potential
for significant impact upon the ravines and encourages the establishment of "a buffer zone at least 10 metres adjacent to the
Ravine, Natural Area or Environmentally Significant Area within which all development is to be discouraged, and where
10 metres is clearly impractical, provide as large a setback from the boundary of the Ravine, Natural Area or
Environmentally Significant Area as is possible". Section 2.54 also addresses the issue of slope stability as it affects the
safety of built structures and their occupants. These sections of the Plan suggest that Council should address the issues of
the protection and enhancement of these areas and that a buffer zone adjacent to the ravines should be enacted.
(d)The former City of Toronto's Zoning By-law (438-86, as amended)
The general Zoning By-law sets regulations for the development of land including: permitted uses, maximum lot coverage
density, minimum lot frontages, setbacks, height, and the requirements for open space and parking, among other matters.
The first comprehensive by-law for the former City of Toronto was enacted in 1952, well before the City introduced
protective measures for the Nordheimer Ravine (1983), and substantially after most of the current development abutting
the ravine.
The authority for the enactment of the Zoning By-law is derived from the Provincial Planning Act. This Act allows
municipalities to regulate the use of land and set standards for most forms of development. As such, the Zoning By-law can
be used to ensure that development is set back from the designated Ravine. At the present time, however, there are no
specific regulations in the General Zoning By-law restricting development within ravines. With the exception of the lands
within and abutting the Park Drive Ravine, the process of regulating development within ravines has only been undertaken
by way of the designation of the Ravines within the Official Plan and with the corresponding regulations found in the
former City of Toronto Municipal Code.
(e)City of Toronto Act and Ravine Control By-law
In 1971, The City of Toronto Act was enacted giving the City legislative powers to regulate ravine preservation by way of
by-laws. The City enacted its first Ravine Control By-law in 1981. It was not until 1983, however, that it enacted By-law
344-83, designating the Nordheimer Ravine limits.
In 1994, the City of Toronto passed By-law 1994-0751, which incorporated the Ravine Control By-law into the City's
Municipal Code, under Chapter 276. The Code currently requires Council consent for any development, change of grade or
removal of vegetation within Ravines and also defines certain exemptions. Lands which are subject to the Ravine Control
process are only those lands wholly located within the ravine boundaries as identified in Chapter 276.
In situations where consent of Council is required under Chapter 276 of the Code, an application is filed with Urban
Planning and Development Services and distributed to other civic departments for comment. Once a satisfactory proposal
is achieved, the recommendations included within a staff report are presented to the Toronto Community Council and City
Council for approval. If approved, the City Solicitor is usually directed to prepare a Ravine Control Agreement.
(f)Site Plan Control
Pursuant to Chapter 165, Article III of the Municipal Code, the proponent of any development within a designated ravine is
required to obtain Site Plan Approval prior to being able to obtain a building permit. This requirement allows the City to
fully regulate all details of the development and to ensure that appropriate landscaping is undertaken, including all aspects
related to grading, drainage and the definition of suitable plant material.
(g)Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
In addition to the municipal approval process, there are two regulations that the Toronto and Region Conservation
Authority (TRCA) applies to development proposals within and adjacent to ravines. The first regulation is Ontario
Regulation 158 under the Conservation Authority Act which regulates the following:
(i)placement of fill within Fill Regulated Areas;
(ii)the building or renovation of structures within a flood plain; and
(iii)the alteration of a watercourse.
Most lands that back onto a ravine are considered by the TRCA to be within a Fill Regulated Area under Ontario
Regulation 158. The TRCA must approve by permit any placing of fill, construction of any sort (e.g. swimming pool,
greenhouse, fencing, etc.), renovation, addition or alteration to an existing building and alteration to a watercourse. The
intent of the Regulation is to prevent development that could lead to damage by floods or erosion and to protect the public.
The second regulation is the TRCA's Valley and Stream Corridor Management Program (VSCMP) which was put in place
in 1994. The TRCA's VSCMP governs the way development is to occur within ravines and aims to protect and rehabilitate
ravine corridor landforms, features and functions while being sensitive to development opportunities. The intent of the
Authority's VSCMP is to prevent new development that would introduce risk to life and property associated with flooding,
erosion and slope stability and/or is not compatible with the protection and rehabilitation of surrounding natural features
and functions. In order to afford some protection to a ravine, the TRCA prescribes a minimum 10 metre setback from the
stable or predicted long-term stable top-of-bank.
2.6Effectiveness of Current Land Use Regulations
The focus of this report has been to review the currently available regulatory tools to determine their ability to deal with
proposed development within and abutting ravine areas.
From a planning perspective, Toronto's ravines are a fundamental feature of the City's infrastructure and a significant
determinant in the form of the development within the City. They also represent a resource and an amenity which cannot be
recreated or replaced. Accordingly, it is appropriate that the Nordheimer Ravine be protected through the implementation
of a buffer zone adjacent to the designated ravine to ensure the stability of the ravine edge and the maintenance of a
naturally vegetated area adjacent to the ravine.
With the exception of the Park Drive Ravine, at present the General Zoning By-law does not implement the policies of the
Official Plan to encourage at least a 10 metre setback for development proposals adjacent to the Nordheimer Ravine, or as
large a setback as possible where a 10 m setback is impractical. This is a "regulatory gap" in the By-law, given the intent of
the Official Plan to preserve and enhance the ravine system.
2.7Development Adjacent to the Nordheimer Ravine
The majority of the 92 properties abutting the Nordheimer Ravine are developed with residential buildings within the
relatively flat tableland portion of the site and with varying amounts of their rear yards reaching into the ravine slope (see
Map 2). This tableland has provided a suitable area for building, while the sloped rear yards have provided a desirable,
wooded slope providing significant privacy. This has resulted in a pattern of low density development which respects the
natural characteristics of the ravine. Buildings have generally been placed well above any areas of significant slope to
ensure slope stability and also to ensure that the scenic value of the ravine is not compromised by development perched on
the edge of the ravine. In certain recent instances, however, the pressures of new development have pushed the limit of this
traditional pattern of development with the construction of new homes and accessory uses verging at the edge of the ravine
slopes, the cutting of existing vegetation and by creating obtrusive and highly visible features from within the ravine. In
some instances in other ravines, development close to the ravine edge has caused increased erosion and even failure of the
ravine slope.
Restricting development within ravines and establishing a development buffer adjacent to environmentally sensitive areas,
such as ravines, is a recognized planning practice in many municipalities. This report recommends that the setback be a
minimum of 10 metres, consistent with Section 2.48(c) of the Official Plan and the practice of the TRCA in its Valley and
Stream Corridor Management Program. The 10 metre setback is also appropriate from a scenic and visual analysis
perspective in that it ensures that most house-form, residential buildings will be set back sufficiently so that the majority of
their bulk will not be visible from within the ravine. Obviously, local circumstances, such as ravine slopes and other factors
including the density of vegetative cover, determine how much of a building can be seen.
3.Conclusions:
Having regard for the City's Official Plan policies respecting the protection of the ravine system, this report concludes that
the City's Zoning By-law needs to be amended to:
-provide greater protection of the natural heritage features of the Nordheimer Ravine;
-maintain its visual and scenic characteristics; and
-minimize the hazardous impact that development may have on the stability of ravine slopes.
It is recommended that the Zoning By-law be amended to indicate those areas of land within and abutting the Nordheimer
Ravine where residential development is not permitted. Specifically, it is recommended that the former City of Toronto's
General Zoning By-law (Section 12 (2)) be amended to identify a "Ravine Impact Area" for the Nordheimer Ravine and to
require that all new development be set back not less than 10 metres from the currently designated Ravine. This 10 metre
setback should help to ensure that there is an appropriate physical relationship between new residential development and
the designated ravine. The line defining the "Ravine Impact Area" would be consistent with the current line defining the
boundary of the Nordheimer Ravine.
So as not to unreasonably impact existing development, which in many cases was constructed prior to the evolution of
environmental policy through the 1960's, it is recommended that an exception be provided in the Zoning By-law
amendment for existing buildings which are currently closer to the top-of-bank than the minimum 10 metre setback
recommended. For example, if a building currently is only 5 metres from the defined Ravine, it is recommended that
additions be permitted to that building so long as the addition is no closer to the Ravine than the original building. The
addition would have to comply with all other applicable laws.
It should also be noted that the original Ravine boundary was defined based on the best information available about the
actual top-of-bank, having appropriate regard for the presence of existing buildings and other changes made to the Ravine
over time. The line was plotted and dimensioned to be placed in the Zoning By-law. However, it is clear that the line is an
approximate representation of the actual top-of-bank. Accordingly, there may be circumstances where it is appropriate to
vary the line based on the findings of environmental analysis and survey. For example, if a property owner can demonstrate
by way of a physical survey, vegetation analysis and restoration plan, as well as an accompanying soils analysis that the
outside boundary of the Ravine Impact Area is actually farther away from the top-of-bank than defined in the Zoning
By-law, then it would be appropriate to grant a variance from the line to allow development to proceed. Such variances
should only be granted after careful study and assessment, including corroborating documentation.
Because the exceptions provided for in the proposed By-law amendment relate to existing development and additions, this
amendment should not have a significant negative impact on maintaining or adding to existing residential buildings.
Non-exempt structures proposed inside the ravine would require consent, site plan approval and variances/rezoning.
Non-exempt development within 10 metres would require variances/rezoning. Again, such approvals should only be
granted after careful study and assessment. Over time, as buildings are redeveloped, the required 10 metre setback will
ensure that all new development is appropriately set back and will create a more sustainable form of development adjacent
to the ravine edge.
Contact Name:Angus Cranston
Telephone: (416) 392-4025
Fax: (416) 392-1330
E-Mail: acransto@toronto.ca
Beate Bowron
Director, Community Planning, South District
(p:\1999\ug\uds\pln\to991915.pln) - pg