STAFF REPORT
November 19, 1999
To: Toronto Community Council
From: Acting Commissioner of Urban Planning and Development Services
Subject: Preliminary Reports on Rezoning Applications for the former Inglis Lands known as Portions of 14 and 20
Strachan Avenue, 121, 128 and 132 Liberty Street; Portions of 14 and 20 Strachan Avenue, 45 and 132R East Liberty
Street; and Portions of 132R East Liberty Street; to construct large format retailing outlets and future residential uses -
Application Nos. 199028, 199029, 199030, 199031 and 199032
(Trinity-Niagara)
Purpose:
To introduce five rezoning proposals to permit retail stores, surface parking, and future residential uses on the lands
formerly occupied by the Inglis manufacturing company, generally south of King Street West and west of Strachan
Avenue.
Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) The applicant be advised of the need to apply for an Official Plan amendment for each rezoning application filed.
(2) The applicant be requested to prepare any studies requested by the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services, to
evaluate the potential traffic, parking and servicing impacts of the applications.
(3) The applicant be requested to submit a study analyzing the impact of the proposed uses on the economic viability and
planned function of the shopping districts in the area.
(4) Subject to the receipt of the above noted Official Plan amendment applications, reports and a revised site plan which
responds to the concerns outlined in this report, that I be requested to hold a public meeting in the community to discuss
the application and to notify owners and residents within 300 metres of the site and the Ward Councillors.
Background:
Site
The lands included in the five applications lie between the Canadian National Railway "Milton" and "Lakeshore" lines,
west of Strachan Avenue, south of King Street West. They are adjoined to the south-west and west by the industrial
properties fronting on Hanna Avenue. In their current form, the applications exclude two properties, (the Latner and Engel
sites), which are centrally situated on the Inglis lands.
The site is generally vacant except for an historic Chapel. The buildings associated with the Inglis plant were demolished
several years ago. The site is used for vehicle parking for events at Exhibition Place and film industry vehicles, as well as a
holding area for towed vehicles.
The Proposals
Access to the site from the east is currently from Strachan Avenue. Access to the west is provided through a narrow lane
extending east from the termination of Liberty Street between the Irwin Toy building and No. 37 Hanna Avenue.
Demolition of a small portion of the north end of the Irwin Toy building will allow for a secondary access point to Hanna
Avenue. The applicant proposes a new "main street" which will connect Liberty Street to Strachan Avenue at Ordinance
Street, and a number of internal streets and driveways which will subdivide the property into smaller blocks.
There are five rezoning applications making up the submission. Four of the applications are for retail uses ranging in size
from 1,300 m2 (14,000 ft2) to 9,011 m2 (97,000 ft2). They include a Canadian Tire store of 7,897 m2 (85,000 ft2) plus a
large garden centre, and a food store of 4,646.8 m2 (50,000 ft2). The larger buildings are proposed to be adjacent to the CN
tracks along the northern property boundary. Smaller retail buildings are proposed adjacent to the Liberty Street extension.
Surface parking lots seem to occupy about half of the area included in the retail applications.
The fifth application proposes two residential blocks adjacent to Strachan Avenue; however, no detailed information has
been submitted yet in support of this application.
Although the applicant has filed individual applications, the site is clearly being treated as one entity and staff are assessing
the proposals on a comprehensive basis.
Reasons for the Application
The applicant has applied for amendments to the Zoning By-law as the proposed uses are not permitted under the existing
industrial zoning.
Comments:
Official Plan
The property is part of the Garrison Common North Area, which was the subject of an Official Plan Part II Study,
implemented through amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law in 1995. This planning initiative attempted to
build on the successes which had been achieved in the surrounding neighbourhood.
The Liberty Area, which extends west of the site to Dufferin Street, has seen a rapid transformation from primary industries
into technology based businesses oriented to the media, advertising and film production. The area also includes a number
of restaurants and galleries, and limited live/work space. The Massey-Harris lands, located on the north side of the CN
railway tracks bordering the north edge of the site, are currently being developed for residential uses with ancillary retail
uses along the King Street West frontage.
In recognition of this context and to encourage a truly mixed-use community, the Part II Plan designated the Inglis lands as
General Use Area-A. This designation permits a range of industrial, commercial and residential uses, subject to
requirements related to urban structure and built form. The Plan identifies the potential for live/work uses, building on the
diverse character of the Liberty Area and the Massey-Harris developments. It also contains policies intended to strengthen
and protect the existing and emerging neighbourhood commercial strips.
The proposed rezoning applications do not seem to reflect the planning vision described in the Part II Plan. The proposed
Canadian Tire store may serve the needs of the local residents and business community, but may, in fact, have a very large
catchment area.
Currently the application for residential uses offers no information as to the type or form of these uses. Staff would prefer
that these blocks provide for a more diverse mix of uses in keeping with the overall planning philosophy for this area.
Given the divergence from the objectives of the recently approved Part II Plan which contemplated a diverse mix of
activities, and the cumulative magnitude of the proposals, I am recommending the applicant be requested to file
corresponding Official Plan amendments for each of the rezoning applications. Until such time as these applications and
supporting materials are received, the current applications cannot be considered complete.
Site Plan and Built Form Matters
There are a numerous issues surrounding the submitted site plan. The Part II Plan contains policies that discourage the use
of private motor vehicles and encourage pedestrian connections. However, the site plan appears to be laid out to facilitate
motor vehicle movement and parking, while offering little support for pedestrian activity.
The proposed block pattern is oriented diagonally along the "Diagonal Way" which runs in front of the large retail
operations shown at the northern part of the site, and along the new "main street" connecting Liberty Street to Strachan
Avenue. This proposed block pattern is entirely out of character with the surrounding neighbourhoods and needs to be
rethought.
Toronto's typical grid street pattern existing in the neighbourhoods surrounding the site needs to be respected. A revised
site plan should ackowledge this pattern, and recognize potential north-south view corridors.
The Liberty Street alignment would locate a substantial portion of the main access road along the south property line,
adjacent to existing industrial buildings fronting on Hanna Avenue. This alignment limits the potential for street-related
retail uses on both sides of the new "main street" and appears to limit access to the road from the south.
The proposed site layout and the scale of some of the proposed buildings do not fit into the surrounding area. The
applications place the largest buildings adjacent to the rail line and locate the majority of the parking areas adjacent to
internal streets. In its current form, the applications do not reflect the kind of street-related activity evident in the Liberty
Area to the west, or in the residential areas to the north.
The applications include some retailing along the Liberty Street extension. The current layout seems to have many
similarities with suburban, auto-oriented retailing since buildings appear isolated by expansive areas of surface parking
with perimeter landscaping. The applicant has suggested that these buildings will more closely resemble typical Toronto
main streets buildings.
Further detail is required to assess the adequacy of the proposed landscaping treatment within the site.
The urban form shown in the current site plan is not consistent with the surrounding neighbourhood, or the Part II Plan
which anticipated the creation of regular streets and blocks typical of the larger area. As part of the continuing discussions
with the applicant, a dialogue should occur about the internal layout of the site, and the type of uses which may be
appropriate for these parcels. Efforts will focus on the need to ensure that the form of the buildings assists in creating an
urban streetscape by defining block edges with taller buildings, and providing for a mix of street related activities.
Economic Activity
The Part II Plan contains several policies geared to strengthening the retail strips along the major streets in the area. It also
states that new retail activity should cater to the needs of the local residents and business community. The proposed uses
appear to diverge from these objectives, and the application requires further analysis to consider potential impacts on the
economic viability and planned function of the existing retail strips. I am therefore recommending that the applicant be
requested to prepare a study to evaluate these impacts.
In the recent Ontario Municipal Board decision on the application for the Home Depot store on the Toronto waterfront, the
Board indicated the importance of the City "remaining vigilant in their protection" of healthy retail strips along main streets
and recognized that they are "essential to the stability and vitality of the residential neighbourhoods" where they are
located. This statement reflects the policies expressed in the Part II Plan for Garrison Common.
Phasing
The applicant has indicated that the proposed site plan will evolve over a period of several years. The proposed uses and
the internal layout are intended to provide a framework for additional retailing or other activity as the area becomes better
established. I am very concerned that the site could end up being developed exclusively for large format retail uses in
single-storey buildings. The site should accommodate a genuine mix of built form and uses including retail, employment,
residential and public activities.
The applicant has suggested that Letters of Credit could be secured by the City to provide for the creation of these
additional uses. This alternative and other possibilities should be considered as part of the further discussions of these
applications and the Official Plan amendments requested.
Transportation Issues
The extension of Liberty Street is shown as proceeding between the south side of the Irwin Toy building and the building at
number 37 Hanna Avenue. The applicant has indicated that the face-to-face distance between these buildings is
approximately 16.5 metres. Following some discussions it is now proposed that two vehicle lanes and a sidewalk may be
accommodated on an interim basis. Widening of the right-of-way to accommodate additional lanes, would require
demolition of one of the adjacent buildings.
Similarly, access is proposed to the north of the Irwin Toy building by way of a narrow, short portion of Hanna Avenue,
which leads west to Atlantic Avenue. With the continued growth of the Liberty area, the intersection of Atlantic Avenue
and King Street West may be required to accommodate a substantial growth in traffic volumes. The configuration of this
intersection raises other concerns including the slope of Hanna Avenue as it intersects King Street West, and the adequacy
of site lines to the east for turning traffic given the proximity of the rail underpass.
The Liberty Area is rapidly evolving into a 24 hour neighbourhood. On any given evening, film production can be found on
many of the streets. Local galleries and restaurants bring people into the area during regular business hours and on
weekends. At a recent meeting of the Parkdale/Liberty Economic Development Committee local accessibility was cited as
a potential limiting factor in expanding and attracting additional businesses. Many of the existing businesses have difficulty
in securing adequate, convenient parking. The effects of the additional traffic generated by the proposals on an area already
experiencing traffic issues require further consideration.
Staff have not had the opportunity to assess other potential impacts of the proposals with respect to the level of the
proposed parking; the impact on existing and future traffic flows; the adequacy of existing and proposed road widths;
potential impacts on transit including the operations of the King Street West streetcar and Go Transit; or the need for
additional municipal traffic infrastructure such as traffic signals. The potential impact on municipal servicing needs will
also have to be considered as part of the further consideration of the applications.
In order to assist in the completion of this review, I am recommending that the applicant be requested to provide additional
studies, to the satisfaction of the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services, to address these issues.
Rail Relocation and Related Issues
The potential relocation of the CN tracks along the north edge of the site was considered as part of the Part II Plan process.
The intent of relocating the tracks was to assist in the integration of the Inglis lands into the fabric of the neighbourhood
emerging on the Massey Harris lands to the north of the tracks. The concept involved relocating the tracks to an alignment
generally along the south side of the site. The former City of Toronto Council endorsed the relocation project, but no funds
have ever been allocated to implement it. The proposed site plan would effectively preclude the relocation of the rail
tracks. Therefore, Council will be required to reconsider its previous position as part of the processing of the applications.
The current site plan does not appear to provide for a setback from the adjacent railway lines. It has been the practice of
CN to request a 15 metre setback (or equivalent) on commercial/industrial sites, and 30 metres (or equivalent) on
residential sites. Reconfiguration of the site plan may assist in resolving this concern, however further evaluation is needed.
The applicant has schematically shown a potential site for an additional GO station just east of King Street West and
Atlantic Avenue. The application provides enhanced pedestrian connections between this new station and the area to the
south and west. Retail uses are also shown adjacent to the station location. The matter of expanded GO service along this
route, including direct service to Lester Pearson International Airport, is under consideration. However, it is unclear
whether a commitment to the new station can be made as part of Council's consideration of these proposals.
Front Street Extension
The proposed applications also raise issues about the future of the Front Street extension. The currently proposed
alignment of the Front Street extension would occupy a substantial portion of the area shown as Application 5,
Residential-Phase 2 on Map 2 of this report. Completion of the Front Street extension remains a high priority of City
Council in the continued development of an overall plan for the waterfront. The requested traffic analysis should include
consideration of the impact of the extension of Front Street on the proposed development.
Heritage
The application does not indicate specific plans for the historic Chapel located on the site although the applicant has
indicated that the structure will be retained and may be used for retail purposes. This building was constructed in 1877, to
serve the Central Prison which occupied the majority of the site before WW II. The preservation of this building and
options for the future use of the structure should be refined as part of the application process with the participation of staff
from Heritage Toronto.
Public Amenities
The current proposal indicates some public amentities including the possible new GO Transit station. As part of the
processing of the current applications and the recommended Official Plan amendments, further consideration should be
given to possible agreements to secure the public amentities proposed in the applications and the public needs anticipated
as a result of the proposed developments.
Lands not Forming Part of the Application
There are two properties internal to the site which are not part of the current applications. These properties are, in effect,
landlocked by the proposed applications since there is no direct access to a public road. These sites are referred to as Latner
and Engel on the site plan (see Map 2). The applicant has informed staff that they are continuing discussions with these
owners in an effort to incorporate the properties into an overall proposal.
Conclusions:
These development proposals raise numerous issues that must be resolved before the applications can be processed further.
The need for Official Plan amendments and a number of additional reports, and further detailed information has been
identified. These are required before technical consideration of the proposal can begin. In particular, the current, very
preliminary and somewhat incomplete site plan needs substantial revision.
However, subject to the receipt of the Official Plan amendments, acceptable studies which address the concerns outlined in
this report, and a revised site plan which responds to the issues raised, I am recommending that a public meeting be held as
the next step in the review of these applications.
Contact:
Rollin Stanley
Senior Planner
Telephone: 392-0424
Fax: 392-1330
E-Mail: rstanley@toronto.ca
Beate Bowron
Director, Community Planning, South District
(p:\1999\ug\uds\pln\to992036.pln) - smc
199028, 199029, 199030, 199031 and 199032
List of Attachments:
Application Data Sheets
Maps (1-3)
APPLICATION DATA SHEET
Site Plan Approval: |
N |
|
Application Number: |
199028 |
Rezoning: |
Y |
|
Application Date: |
October 19, 1999 |
O. P. A.: |
N |
|
Date of Revision: |
|
Confirmed Municipal Address: Portions of 14, 20 Strachan Avenue, 121, 128, 132R East Liberty Street.
Nearest Intersection: |
South-west corner of Wellington St. W. and Strachan Ave. |
|
|
Project Description: |
To permit the construction of a Canadian Tire retail store and ancillary
retail uses up to a maximum of 9987 m2 of retail space within the allowed
3x coverage. (Application 1 of 5) |
Applicant:
Goodman & Carr (Patrick Devine)
200 King Street W., #2300
595-2300 |
Agent:
Goodman & Carr (Patrick Devine)
200 King Street W., #2300
595-2300 |
Architect:
|
PLANNING CONTROLS (For verification refer to Chief Building Official)
Official Plan Designation: |
|
Site Specific Provision: |
No |
Zoning District: |
I3 D3 |
Historical Status: |
20 Strachan Ave. designated |
Height Limit (m): |
18.0 |
Site Plan Control: |
Yes |
PROJECT INFORMATION
Site Area: |
33208.0 m2 |
|
Height: |
Storeys: |
|
Frontage: |
|
|
|
Metres: |
|
Depth: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indoor |
Outdoor |
|
|
Ground Floor: |
|
|
Parking
Spaces: |
|
399 |
|
|
Residential
GFA: |
|
|
Loading
Docks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Residential GFA: |
9987.0 m2 |
|
(number,
type) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GFA: |
9987.0 m2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOOR AREA BREAKDOWN |
|
|
|
|
|
Land Use |
Above Grade |
Below Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
9987.0 m2 |
|
PROPOSED DENSITY |
|
|
Residential Density: |
Non-Residential Density: 0.30 |
Total Density: 0.30 |
Status: |
Application received. |
Data valid: |
October 18, 1999 |
Section: |
CP South District |
Phone: |
392-7333 |
APPLICATION DATA SHEET
Site Plan Approval: |
N |
|
Application Number: |
199029 |
Rezoning: |
Y |
|
Application Date: |
October 19, 1999 |
O. P. A.: |
N |
|
Date of Revision: |
|
Confirmed Municipal Address: Portions of 121, 132R East Liberty Street.
Nearest Intersection: |
South of King St. W., east of Atlantic Ave. |
|
|
Project Description: |
To permit an A & P grocery store and ancillary retail uses up to a maximum
of 5110 m2 (0.22x) of retail space within the allowed 3x coverage
(Application 2 of 5). |
Applicant:
Goodman & Carr (Patrick Devine)
200 King Street West, #2300
595-2300 |
Agent:
Goodman & Carr (Patrick Devine)
200 King Street West, #2300
595-2300 |
Architect:
|
PLANNING CONTROLS (For verification refer to Chief Building Official)
Official Plan Designation: |
|
Site Specific Provision: |
No |
Zoning District: |
I3 D3 |
Historical Status: |
No |
Height Limit (m): |
18.0 |
Site Plan Control: |
Yes |
PROJECT INFORMATION
Site Area: |
23836.0 m2 |
|
Height: |
Storeys: |
|
Frontage: |
|
|
|
Metres: |
|
Depth: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indoor |
Outdoor |
|
|
Ground Floor: |
|
|
Parking
Spaces: |
|
220 |
|
|
Residential
GFA: |
|
|
Loading
Docks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Residential GFA: |
5110.0 m2 |
|
(number,
type) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GFA: |
5110.0 m2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOOR AREA BREAKDOWN |
|
|
|
|
|
Land Use |
Above Grade |
Below Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
5110.0 m2 |
|
PROPOSED DENSITY |
|
|
Residential Density: |
Non-Residential Density: 0.22 |
Total Density: 0.22 |
Status: |
Application received. |
Data valid: |
October 19, 1999 |
Section: |
CP South District |
Phone: |
392-7333 |
APPLICATION DATA SHEET
Site Plan Approval: |
N |
|
Application Number: |
199030 |
Rezoning: |
Y |
|
Application Date: |
October 19, 1999 |
O. P. A.: |
N |
|
Date of Revision: |
|
Confirmed Municipal Address: Portions of 121, 132R East Liberty Street.
Nearest Intersection: |
South of King St. W., east of Atlantic Ave. |
|
|
Project Description: |
To permit barber shops, news-stands, small restaurants and take-out
establishments, banks and dry cleaners up to a maximum of 2462 m2 retail
space within the allowed 3x coverage (Application 3 of 5). |
Applicant:
Goodman & Carr (Patrick Devine)
200 King Street W., #2300
595-2300 |
Agent:
Goodman & Carr (Patrick Devine)
200 King Street W., #2300
595-2300 |
Architect:
|
PLANNING CONTROLS (For verification refer to Chief Building Official)
Official Plan Designation: |
|
Site Specific Provision: |
No |
Zoning District: |
I3 D3 |
Historical Status: |
No |
Height Limit (m): |
18.0 |
Site Plan Control: |
Yes |
PROJECT INFORMATION
Site Area: |
8928.0 m2 |
|
Height: |
Storeys: |
|
Frontage: |
|
|
|
Metres: |
|
Depth: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indoor |
Outdoor |
|
|
Ground Floor: |
|
|
Parking
Spaces: |
|
139 |
|
|
Residential
GFA: |
|
|
Loading
Docks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Residential GFA: |
2462.0 m2 |
|
(number,
type) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GFA: |
2462.0 m2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOOR AREA BREAKDOWN |
|
|
|
|
|
Land Use |
Above Grade |
Below Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
2462.0 m2 |
|
PROPOSED DENSITY |
|
|
Residential Density: |
Non-Residential Density: 0.28 |
Total Density: 0.28 |
Status: |
Application received. |
Data valid: |
October 19, 1999 |
Section: |
CP South District |
Phone: |
392-7333 |
APPLICATION DATA SHEET
Site Plan Approval: |
N |
|
Application Number: |
199031 |
Rezoning: |
Y |
|
Application Date: |
October 19, 1999 |
O. P. A.: |
N |
|
Date of Revision: |
|
Confirmed Municipal Address: Portions of 132R East Liberty Street.
Nearest Intersection: |
South of King St. W., east of Atlantic Ave. |
|
|
Project Description: |
To permit barber shops, news-stands, small restaurants and take-out
establishments, banks and dry-cleaners up to a maximum of 2787 m2 of
retail space within the allowed 3x coverage (Appl. 4 of 5). |
Applicant:
Goodman & Carr (Patrick Devine)
200 King Street W., #2300
595-2300 |
Agent:
Goodman & Carr (Patrick Devine)
200 King Street W., #2300
595-2300 |
Architect:
|
PLANNING CONTROLS (For verification refer to Chief Building Official)
Official Plan Designation: |
|
Site Specific Provision: |
No |
Zoning District: |
I3 D3 |
Historical Status: |
No |
Height Limit (m): |
18.0 |
Site Plan Control: |
Yes |
PROJECT INFORMATION
Site Area: |
9594.0 m2 |
|
Height: |
Storeys: |
|
Frontage: |
|
|
|
Metres: |
|
Depth: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indoor |
Outdoor |
|
|
Ground Floor: |
|
|
Parking
Spaces: |
|
115 |
|
|
Residential
GFA: |
|
|
Loading
Docks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Residential GFA: |
|
|
(number,
type) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GFA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FLOOR AREA BREAKDOWN |
|
|
|
|
|
Land Use |
Above Grade |
Below Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
2787.0 m2 |
|
PROPOSED DENSITY |
|
|
Residential Density: |
Non-Residential Density: 0.29 |
Total Density: 0.29 |
Status: |
Application received. |
Data valid: |
October 19, 1999 |
Section: |
CP South District |
Phone: |
392-7333 |
APPLICATION DATA SHEET
Site Plan Approval: |
N |
|
Application Number: |
199032 |
Rezoning: |
Y |
|
Application Date: |
October 19, 1999 |
O. P. A.: |
N |
|
Date of Revision: |
|
Confirmed Municipal Address: Portions of 14, 20 Strachan Ave., 45, 132R East Liberty Street.
Nearest Intersection: |
South-west corner of Wellington St. W. and Strachan Ave. |
|
|
Project Description: |
To permit residential uses of a variety of housing types up to a maximum
density of 3x coverage or 168 540 m2 of floor space to be developed in
phases over time (Application 5 of 5). |
Applicant:
Goodman & Carr (Patrick Devine)
200 King Street W., #2300
595-2300 |
Agent:
Goodman & Carr (Patrick Devine)
200 King Street W., #2300
595-2300 |
Architect:
|
PLANNING CONTROLS (For verification refer to Chief Building Official)
Official Plan Designation: |
|
Site Specific Provision: |
No |
Zoning District: |
I3 D3 |
Historical Status: |
20 Strachan Ave. designated |
Height Limit (m): |
18.0 |
Site Plan Control: |
Yes |
PROJECT INFORMATION
Site Area: |
56180.0 m2 |
|
Height: |
Storeys: |
|
Frontage: |
|
|
|
Metres: |
|
Depth: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indoor |
Outdoor |
|
|
Ground Floor: |
|
|
Parking
Spaces: |
|
|
|
|
Residential
GFA: |
168540.0 m2 |
|
Loading
Docks: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Residential GFA: |
|
|
(number,
type) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total GFA: |
168540.0 m2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DWELLING UNITS |
|
FLOOR AREA BREAKDOWN |
Tenure: |
To be determined |
|
|
|
Land Use |
Above Grade |
Below Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
168540.0 m2 |
|
PROPOSED DENSITY |
|
|
Residential Density: 3.00 |
Non-Residential Density: |
Total Density: 3.00 |
Status: |
Application received. |
Data valid: |
October 19, 1999 |
Section: |
CP South District |
Phone: |
392-7333 |