City of Toronto   *
HomeContact UsHow Do I...? Advanced search Go
Living in TorontoDoing businessVisiting TorontoAccessing City Hall
 
Accessing City Hall
Mayor
Councillors
Meeting Schedules
   
   
  City of Toronto Council and Committees
  All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@toronto.ca.
   

 


August 23, 1999

 To:Works Committee

From:Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services

Subject:Red Light Enforcement Pilot Project

 Purpose:

The purpose of this report is to provide the Works Committee with a status report on the Red Light Enforcement Pilot Project for consideration in association with the supplementary report recommending an award of contract.

Following the contract Tender opening on August 25, 1999, the Project Steering Committee representing the six participating municipalities will meet to evaluate the tenders for the supply, installation, operation and maintenance of red light camera systems within their respective jurisdictions. A report recommending an award of contract will be submitted to the Works Committee at its meeting on September 8, 1999.

Due to the tight schedule, the report containing the recommendations may only be distributed to Committee members at the meeting. This "advance" report provides information on all components of the project as well as the contract tender process in preparation for the Works Committee meeting on September 8, 1998.

Funding Sources:

The funds required for the City of Toronto's component of the Red Light Enforcement Pilot Project are contained in the Works and Emergency Services Department Capital Program. The estimated cost for the City of Toronto is $3,000,000.00 and the debt charge will be offset from the revenue generated by offence notices issued through the project.

Recommendation:

It is recommended that this report be considered by the Committee along with the supplementary report to follow on the award of contract for red light camera systems and forwarded to Council and the Police Services Board for information.

Background:

On December 18, 1998, the Red Light Cameras Pilot Projects Act, 1998 (Bill 102) received Royal Assent. The Act amends the Highway Traffic Act to enable municipalities, for a period of two years, to use evidence obtained from red light cameras to issue violation notices. This Act comes into force on a date to be named by proclamation of the Lieutenant Governor when at least one municipality is ready to start its pilot project.

City Council, at its meeting held on December 16 and 17, 1998, resolved that:

(1)authority be granted to the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services to issue a public tender call for the supply, installation and maintenance of red-light camera systems at 10 high risk City intersections and the installation of camera housings and detector subsystems at a further 10 high risk City intersections;

(2)funding for these installations, estimated to be $3,000,000.00, be provided from the 1999 Transportation Capital Budget and that the debt charge be offset from the revenue generated by tickets produced by the red-light camera system;

(3)the Traffic Services Unit of Toronto Police Services be requested to report on simultaneous police enforcement of an additional 10 high risk City intersections to satisfy the Minister of Transportation's requirement for the pilot project, and that extraordinary police costs for this experiment be reimbursed from revenue generated by tickets issued as part of this pilot project;

(4)application be made to the Insurance Bureau of Canada for funding assistance for this pilot project, including police enforcement costs;

(5)the appropriate City staff be authorized to meet with provincial officials to finalize the necessary agreements for this project as required by the new legislation; and

(6)excess revenues generated by the pilot project go to the provision of additional cameras and housings.

Discussion:

Red light running is one of several aggressive driving behaviours that contributes to the annual toll of collisions and injuries at intersections in Ontario. In 1996, there were 44,971 collisions at signalized intersections operated by municipalities in Ontario. This accounts for 21 per cent of all motor vehicle collisions in the province. Seventeen per cent of these collisions were the direct result of drivers disobeying a red light. Collisions resulting from red light running tend to be more severe than other intersection collisions because they typically involve at least one vehicle travelling at a high rate of speed. Moreover, in the most serious red light running collisions, the initial impact involves vehicles colliding at right angles to each other. This means that one vehicle is generally struck on its side. Side impact collisions tend to result in severe injury for two reasons: first, there is significant intrusion into the cab of the struck vehicle and, second, seat belts are less effective under these circumstances. Seat belts were designed primarily to protect vehicle occupants involved in head-on collisions.

In September 1998, the City of Toronto installed a camera on the westbound approach at the intersection of St. Clair Avenue West and Dufferin Street as an operational test of the equipment. The camera recorded about 60 red light violations per day prior to the installation of a warning sign and a media announcement. Once the warning sign was installed and the location was revealed to the media, the number of violations was reduced to about 30 per day.

In announcing Bill 102, the Province stipulated that municipalities wishing to introduce red-light camera pilot projects will be required to introduce stepped-up police enforcement at other high-risk intersections to allow for comparison between the cameras and traditional enforcement. In February 1999, the Ontario Minister of Transportation invited interested municipalities and police services to attend a series of "Kick-off" meetings in order to establish a shared understanding regarding the purpose of the pilot projects, to address operational issues, and to reinforce a partnership approach with key stakeholders. Since then, a provincial-municipal Project Steering Committee was established to guide and direct three Working Groups. Working Group 1 is responsible for determining site selection criteria, conducting the evaluation study, establishing a police enforcement strategy and preparing a public awareness program. Working Group 2 is responsible for establishing a common province-wide approach to equipment selection, installation and operation. Working Group 3 is responsible for providing input into the regulations being developed under the Highway Traffic Act and Provincial Offences Act, regarding the processing of charges through the court system, as well as providing legal advice as required to the Steering Committee and Working Groups.

Municipalities and Police Services participating in the pilot project include the Regional Municipality of Halton, Regional Municipality of Hamilton-Wentworth (with the City of Hamilton), Regional Municipality of Peel (with the City of Mississauga), Regional Municipality of Ottawa-Carleton, City of Toronto and Regional Municipality of Waterloo. Provincial ministries facilitating the pilot project include the Ministry of Transportation and the Ministry of the Attorney General. The Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner for Ontario has also provided their advice to the Working Groups.

(1)Site Selection

Each participating municipality identified high-risk locations based primarily on historical collision data. In total, municipalities intend to purchase 19 red-light cameras and equip 74 fully prepared sites. Municipalities will be rotating the cameras around the prepared sites so that photo enforcement will occur at all prepared sites. In addition, participating police services have been requested to provide stepped-up traditional police enforcement at a total of 30 sites. The City of Toronto intends to purchase 10 cameras and prepare 40 sites. The exact total will depend upon actual prices received through the equipment tender process. The Toronto Police Service has committed to providing stepped-up police enforcement at 6 sites. The proposed 46 sites for the City of Toronto are listed in Appendix A.

In Toronto, the total number of collisions normally associated with red-light running (right-angle, left-turn, pedestrian and cyclist types) were reviewed for each signalized intersection for the three year period from January 1, 1994 to December 31, 1996. The collision reports for the top 100 intersections were examined and collision totals were provided for each intersection approach to provide a list of approximately 400 high-risk approaches. Approaches from the ten intersections with the highest collision frequency in 1997 (all collision types) were also included. From the total list, 46 approaches with the highest number of relevant collisions were selected. In order to maximize the impact of red-light cameras on the behavior of road users throughout the City of Toronto, the list of high-risk approaches was reviewed to confirm that there was relatively even distribution throughout the City. From the list of 46 locations, one intersection per community council area was selected for stepped-up police enforcement.

Community Safety Zones are designated areas within municipalities where the fines for moving violations including red-light running are increased. The City of Toronto and other Ontario municipalities are currently evaluating the benefits of Community Safety Zones. In order to maintain as much independence as possible between the two evaluation studies (red-light cameras and Community Safety Zones), intersection approaches within Community Safety Zones were not selected for red-light cameras.

Intersection approaches with streetcar tracks were not selected because most red-light camera systems require vehicle detectors that are installed in the pavement. The streetcar rails make installation impractical and the radio frequency signals transmitted from the streetcar track switching equipment may interfere with the calculations performed by the red light camera system. Similarly, locations undergoing major road construction were not selected because construction activity prevents the installation of vehicle detectors and makes the installation and operation of other associated red-light camera system equipment impractical.

(2) Evaluation Study

The objective of the project evaluation is to conduct a before and after study to assess the combined effect of two red light running countermeasures for intersections with a high incidence of red light running related collisions namely: red light camera systems and stepped-up police enforcement.

Working Group 1, with the assistance of the Ministry of Transportation, has hired a consultant to conduct the study. The consultant will study approximately 50 sites in total. Study locations will be comprised of approximately equal numbers of red light camera sites, stepped-up enforcement sites, and control sites receiving routine police enforcement. Sites will be matched on the basis of collision frequencies, traffic volumes and approach geometrics. Study locations receiving increased enforcement will be selected from the 74 red-light camera sites and 30 stepped-up police enforcement sites. In order to accurately measure the combined effect of the pilot project at the treated sites and to minimize the potential spillover effect of the increased enforcement at the control sites, it was decided to select control sites that are sufficiently distant from the treated sites. Municipalities that are not directly participating in the pilot project have been contacted and arrangements are being made with them to select control sites and collect data from intersections in their jurisdiction.

Data to be collected at all study sites will include collision frequencies, traffic volumes and red light violations. Data relevant to other violations will be collected at the stepped-up police enforcement sites. Annual totals of red light running convictions within the court districts of the participating municipalities will be also be obtained. An interim report with twelve months of after data and a final report with the results for the entire two-year after period will be prepared. The final report will include a cost accounting for each treatment and for the program as a whole.

(3) Stepped-Up Police Enforcement

Working Group 1, in consultation with participating police services, prepared a stepped-up police enforcement strategy. The objective of the strategy is to provide an effective sustainable police presence with existing resources allowing police flexibility to schedule enforcement blitzes. Stepped-up police enforcement will occur at 30 sites in total. Police services for Hamilton-Wentworth, Ottawa-Carleton, Peel and Toronto will be responsible for six sites each while police services for Halton and Waterloo will be responsible for three sites each.

Each site will receive two blitzes, one per year, during the course of the two-year pilot project. The project will have three four-week blitz periods per year, or six in total. The four-week periods will be selected within each of the two-month periods of March/April, July/August, and October/November. Therefore, the first blitz will occur in the spring of 2000 and the final blitz will occur in the fall of 2001.

An individual blitz will consist of 20 hours of enforcement in total. Enforcement will occur on 10 separate days, 2 hours per day, either during the morning or afternoon peak period. The 10 days of enforcement will be selected at random within the four-week periods.

(4) Public Awareness Program

A public awareness program will be prepared for this project prior to the operation of red light cameras. A campaign guide is being developed by the Ministry of Transportation that will assist municipalities in addressing the problem of red light running. The proposed how-to-guide will contain information on planning and implementing a community-based public education and enforcement program that targets red light runners and intersection safety. The guide will include artwork for posters, print inserts and flyers, sample radio public service announcements, and information on traffic signs and signals. It will be distributed to municipalities, community traffic safety groups and police.

In order to satisfy concerns expressed by the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, signs will be posted to advise drivers of the presence of the red-light cameras. Two options are currently being considered. One option is to post signs advising motorists in advance of each intersection approach with red-light cameras. The other option is to post signs at the City's boarders advising motorists that City intersections are photo enforced. This issue will be resolved at a later date.

 (5) Equipment Installation and Operation

In January 1999, the City of Toronto requested contractors experienced in the supply and installation of red light camera systems to submit an application to become a pre-qualified contractor for this project. As a result, the following five firms were pre-qualified to submit tenders: EDS of Canada Ltd. and Redflex Traffic Systems Pty. Ltd., Guild Electric Limited, Lockheed Martin IMS Canada Inc., Stacey Electric Company Limited, and Tellis Traffic Inc.

On July 28, 1999 a public tender for the supply, installation, operation and maintenance of red-light camera systems for all participating municipalities was released to the five pre-qualified contractors. The scope of the tender includes the supply, installation, operation and maintenance of the red light camera units, prepared sites (poles, enclosures, flash units, and wiring), image processing hardware and software stations, and printers. The operation and maintenance activities include the supply, loading and unloading, development and delivery of photographic film, as well as, the rotation and maintenance of the camera units. The tender includes provisions for additional cameras and sites, extended operation and maintenance beyond the two-year period, and the sale of equipment at the end of the project, if required. Municipalities are responsible for the field preparation of the camera sites, which will include the installation of the pole bases, wiring and power supply to the pole bases and the installation of the vehicle detectors in accordance with the successful bidder's specifications.

Although a common tender for all municipalities was issued, each municipality will be required to sign a separate contract with the successful bidder covering, insurance, bonding and payment issues. Each municipality has assigned a Project Manager who will be responsible for site supervision, acceptance testing, operating and maintenance issues within their respective jurisdiction.

(6) Regulations

There are a number of regulations required for the introduction red light cameras including amendments under the Highway Traffic Act and the Provincial Offences Act.

On April 30, 1999 the Red Light Camera System Evidence regulation made under the Highway Traffic Act was filed with the registrar of regulations. This regulation sets out the requirements around the photographs and the service of the Offence Notice. The regulation appeared in the Ontario Gazette on May 15, 1999. On June 21, 1999 the Ministry of the Attorney General presented the "Rules to Implement Red Light Cameras Pilot Project Act, 1998" to the Provincial Offences Act Rules Subcommittee.

Regulations dealing with the Certificate of Offence, Offence Notice and the designation of municipalities have yet to be made and will occur over the next few months.

(7)Processing of Charges and the Municipal Processing Centre

Working Group 3, with the assistance of the Ministry of the Attorney General, defined the process for the laying and processing of charges using photographic evidence obtained from red light cameras in Ontario. The main sub-components of the process include: matching photo and plate information, laying of charges by a Provincial Offences Officer, defendant response options, requesting trial, operation of first attendance facility, trials, defendant appeals and re-openings.

A municipal processing centre is required to perform several functions within this process, primarily: matching photo and plate information, laying of charges, assisting the Prosecutor in preparing the photographic evidence for first attendance and trial. The provincial court system is currently responsible for the remaining functions. Processing centre staff will receive developed rolls of film from the equipment contractor, images from the film will be digitized and retrieved with the aid of a computer program. A Provincial Offences Officer will view the digital images, and determine if an offence has occurred. If an offence has occurred, the licence plate number will be read from the digital image and entered on a form to request uncertified plate registration information from the Ministry of Transportation. Once the plate registration information is obtained, the Offence Notice Form is completed and mailed to the owner of the vehicle. If a defendant contests the charge and requests a trial, the municipal processing centre is required to assist the Prosecutor by providing the original photographs and certified plate registration information.

In order to ensure a consistent approach to the processing of red light camera violations, the Project Steering Committee opted for a centralized processing centre operated by municipal staff. Furthermore, due to the number of camera sites proposed for Toronto and the central location of Toronto relative to the participating municipalities, it was decided that the City of Toronto, Transportation Services would staff and operate the processing centre for all municipalities. The location of the processing centre will be the Corporate Computer and Communication Centre at 703 Don Mills Road. Agreements will be negotiated with the other participating municipalities to recover the applicable operating costs for the processing centre. Details regarding the staffing, office space and equipment requirements will need to be established, however, preliminary estimates suggest that the minimum staffing requirements for the centre will be one Supervisor, one Provincial Offences Officer and three Data Entry Clerks.

(8)Financial Aspects

All costs associated with the Red Light Enforcement Pilot Project will be borne by the participating municipalities. Provincial costs include providing project facilitation and legal services, conducting the evaluation study as well as developing and supporting systems to provide motor vehicle plate registration information. Provincial costs will be recovered through a transaction fee each time municipalities request motor vehicle plate registration information.

With respect to the City of Toronto, Council has directed that funding for the installation of red light cameras be provided from the 1999 Transportation Capital Budget and the debt charge be offset from the revenue generated by tickets produced by the red light camera system. In addition, Council directed that extraordinary police costs be reimbursed from the revenue generated by tickets issued as part of the project.

The set fine for running a red light is $155 plus a $30 victim fine surcharge. Currently, all revenues from moving violations, including red light running, flow to the Province as stipulated in the Provincial Offences Act (POA). The Province has indicated that municipalities will be able to access these revenues, not including the victim fine surcharge, once municipalities have assumed responsibility for Courts Administration and Court Support Services for offences under Parts I and III of the POA and for prosecutions of offences under Part I of the POA. Bill 108, the Streamlining of Administration of Provincial Offences Act, 1998, provides the framework for this transfer of responsibilities. It is our understanding that the City of Toronto is currently considering the POA transfer, however, if it proceeds it will not take place until April 2000 at the earliest.

Given the potential delay in offsetting the debt charge for this project, the Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer has requested the Ontario Minister of Finance to make the revenues generated from Offence Notices issued through the Red Light Enforcement Pilot Project available to municipalities prior to the completion of the POA transfer process.

In April 1999, the Province of Ontario and the Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC) announced the Road Safety Value Partnership (RSVP) program. Through this program, both the Province and the IBC will contribute a matching dollar amount to a police service wishing to dedicate a component of its budget to the program. The funds are intended for traditional police enforcement activities and may not be used for the purchase and installation of red light cameras. The funds may be used by police services, if desired, to offset costs associated with the stepped-up police enforcement activities for the Red Light Enforcement Pilot Project.

(9)Provincial/Municipal Operational Agreements

In order to become designated as a Red Light Enforcement Pilot area in the regulation, participating municipalities must sign an operational agreement with the Ministry of Transportation. A draft copy of the Table of Contents for the proposed operational agreement is included in Appendix B. Staff will also be submitting a recommendation to the Works Committee at its meeting on September 8, 1999, seeking approval for the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services to enter into this agreement with the Ministry of Transportation.

Operational agreements will clarify the responsibilities of all parties to ensure that the red light offenders are successfully prosecuted and that the two enforcement strategies are properly evaluated. Agreement provisions will include requirements for Provincial cost recovery, compliance with the applicable laws, stepped-up police enforcement blitzes, data collection and submission associated with the evaluation study, intersection selection criteria, minimum specifications for the camera equipment, business processes to be followed by all parities, termination of contracts and surviving obligations. A common format will be used for all municipal agreements with the Ministry of Transportation.

(10) Schedule

The following table provides a tentative schedule of the major activities within the Red Light Enforcement Pilot Project:

 
 Date Activity
July 28, 1999 Equipment tender released to pre-qualified contractors.
August 25, 1999 Closing date for tender
September 1, 1999 Start of evaluation study's "before" data collection period
September 8, 1999 Recommendation to award equipment contract considered by Toronto Works Committee

Recommendation to enter into an operational agreement with Ministry of Transportation considered by Toronto Works Committee

Mid-September, 1999 Prepare Offence Notice and Certificate of Offence
September 28, 1999 Recommendation to award equipment contract considered by Toronto Council

Recommendation to enter into an operational agreement with Ministry of Transportation considered by Toronto Council

Award of equipment contract to successful bidder

Early-October, 1999 Sign operational agreement with the Ministry of Transportation
Mid-November, 1999 First camera site installed and tested

Request Province to proclaim Bill 102 for Mid-December

Present HTA and POA regulations to Provincial Regulations and Legislation Committee.

Early-December, 1999 End of evaluation study's "before" data collection period

Details regarding Processing Centre staffing, office space and equipment requirements are finalized.

Mid-December 1999 Sufficient camera sites installed and tested to begin operation.

Two-year pilot project begins

January 2000 Start of evaluation study's "after" data collection period
February 2000 Last of Toronto's 40 camera sites installed
March/April 2000 First stepped-up police enforcement blitz
July/August 2000 Second stepped-up police enforcement blitz
October/November 2000 Third stepped-up police enforcement blitz
March/April 2001 Fourth stepped-up police enforcement blitz
July/August 2001 Fifth stepped-up police enforcement blitz
Summer 2001 Evaluation study's interim report
October/November 2001 Sixth stepped-up police enforcement blitz
December 2001 Pilot project ends

End of evaluation study's "after" data collection period

May 2002 Evaluation study's final report

Conclusions:

The Red Light Enforcement Pilot Project represents an opportunity to introduce a major traffic safety initiative at no cost to taxpayers and is on schedule to begin by December 1999. A report containing a recommendation on the award of the contract for the supply, installation, operation and maintenance of red light camera systems will be submitted to the Works Committee on September 8, 1999.

Contact Name:

Les Kelman, P.Eng.

Director, Transportation Systems

Tel: (416) 392-5372

Fax:(416) 397-5011

     David C. Kaufman

General Manager, Transportation Services

     Barry H. Gutteridge

Commissioner, Works and Emergency Services

RAN/

APPENDIX A

City of Toronto, Red Light Enforcement Pilot Project

Red Light Camera Sites *

 Intersection (Approach)  Ward Intersection (Approach)  Ward
Allen Rd. at Sheppard Ave. E., (NB)

Avenue Rd. at Davenport Rd. (SB)

Carlaw Ave. at Queen St. E. (SB)

Dixon Rd. at Islington Ave. (WB)

Dixon Rd. at Martingrove Rd. (WB)

Don Mills Rd. at Finch Ave. E. (NB)

Duffer St. at Bloor St. W. (SB)

Dufferin St. at Dupont St. (NB)

Dufferin St. at Finch Ave. W. (NB)

Dufferin St. at Rogers Rd. (SB)

Eglinton Ave. E. at Don Mills Rd. (WB)

Eglinton Ave. E. at Pharmacy Ave. (WB)

Eglinton Ave. W. at Dufferin St. (WB)

Eglinton Ave. W. at Martingrove Rd. (EB)

Ellesmere Rd at Brimley Rd. (EB)

Finch Ave. W. at Jane St. (EB)

Finch Ave. W. at Kipling Ave. (EB)

Finch Ave. W. at Weston Rd. (WB)

Huntingwood Dr. at McCowan Rd. (EB)

Kingston Rd. at Morningside Ave. (WB)

 8

23

25

3

3, 5

12

20, 21

21

8

21, 28

11

13,14

28

4

15

7

5

6

18

16

 Lake Shore Blvd. W. at Jameson Ave. (WB)

Lawrence Ave. E. at Markham Rd. (WB)

Lawrence Ave. E. at Warden Ave. (EB)

Lawrence Ave. W. at Weston Rd. (WB)

Markham Rd. at Ellesmere Rd. (SB)

Royal York Rd. at The Queensway (SB)

Signet Dr. at Finch Ave. W. (SB)

St. Clair Ave. E. at Victoria Park Ave. (WB)

Steeles Ave. E. at Warden Ave. (EB)

Steeles Ave. W. at Dufferin St. (EB)

Victoria Park Ave at Lawrence Ave. E. (NB)

Woodbine Ave. at Kingston Rd. (NB)

Yonge St. at Bishop Ave./Hendon Ave.(SB)

Yonge St. at Eglinton Ave. (NB)

Yonge St. at Finch Ave. (NB)

Yonge St. at Richmond St. (NB)

Yonge St. at Steeles Ave (SB)

Yonge St. at Wellesley St. (NB)

Yonge St. at York Mills Rd. (NB)

York St at Lake Shore Blvd. W. (NB)

 19

15, 16

14

27

15

2

6

1,13

17

8

11,14

26

10

22

10

24

10

24

9

24

 * subject to confirmation by selected contractor

Stepped -Up Police Enforcement Sites

 

 Intersection (Approach)

 Ward Intersection (Approach)  Ward
Albion Rd at Finch Ave. W. (WB)

Bridgeland Ave at Dufferin St. (EB)

Eglinton Ave. E. at Laird Dr. (WB)

 5

8

1

 Eglinton Ave. W. at Jane St. (EB)

McCowan Rd. at Lawrence Ave. E. (SB)

University Ave. at Gerrard St. (NB)

 27

15

24

APPENDIX B

PROVINCIAL / MUNICIPAL

RED LIGHT ENFORCEMENT PILOT PROJECT OPERATIONAL AGREEMENT

 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

 1.0 Definition of Terms

2.1Obligations of the Ministry

2.1.1Development of Study Design

2.1.2Hiring the Project Consultant

2.1.3Business/Court Processes Documentation

2.1.4Access to Information Products

2.2Obligations of the Municipal Organization

2.2.1Compliance with Laws and Regulations

2.2.2 Traditional Enforcement

2.2.3 Data Collection and Participation in the Pilot Evaluation Process

2.2.4Use of Sub-Contractors in the Operation of Municipal Red Light Enforcement Pilot Project

2.2.5 Signing at Red Light Camera Intersections

3.0 Grant of Licence

3.1Grant

3.2Title

3.3Authorized Use

3.4Data Matching and Data Profiling

3.5Individuals Not To Be Contacted

3.6Document Destruction

3.7Survival

4.0 Terms

4.1Terms and Termination

4.2Early Termination

4.3Surviving Obligations of the Municipal Organization

4.4Surviving Obligations of the Ministry

4.5Conflict With Privacy Laws

5.0Transmission of Information Products

6.0 Fees and Charges

6.1 Payment of Amounts

6.2Method and Timing of Payment

6.3First Payment

6.4Payment Information

7.0 Transaction Logs

8.0 Information Integrity, Security and Audit

8.1 Year 2000 Readiness

8.2Virus Protection

8.3Security

8.4Audit

9.0Default

9.1 Default

9.2Events of Default

10.0Certification of Records

10.1Certification by Registrar

10.2Transmission of Certified Information Products

11. 0 General

11.1Independent Contractor

11.2Indemnity

11.3Limitation of Liability

11.4Force Majeure

11.5Advertising

11.6Enforceability

11.7Evidence

11.8Non-Assignability

11.9Notification of Breach

11.10Objection Procedure

11.11Notices

11.12Waiver of Provisions

11.13Entire Agreement

11.14Survival of Provisions

11.15Jurisdiction of Contract

11.16Conflict Between Red Light Enforcement Project Agreement and Law

11.17Severability of Clauses

11.18Interpretation

11.19Time of Essence

11.20Enurement

Schedules

"A" Recommended and Mandatory Business/Court Processes and Documentation

"B" Approved Conventional Roadside Police Enforcement Program of the Municipal Organization

"C" Approved Red Light Technology Plan of the Municipal Organization

"D" Approved Pilot Program of the Municipal Organization

"E" Information Product Protocol

"F" Employer/Employee/Agent Security Statements

  NOTE: The headings used in this Table of Contents are not considered part of the Agreement and are solely for convenience.

 

   
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@toronto.ca.

 

City maps | Get involved | Toronto links
© City of Toronto 1998-2005