March 15, 1999
To:Works and Utilities Committee
From:Barry H. Gutteridge
Commissioner, Works and Emergency Services
Subject:Solid Waste Management Marketplace Engagement Process
Greater Toronto Area Memorandum of Understanding
Purpose:
The purpose of this report is to present recommendations concerning the adoption of a
Memorandum of Understanding regarding a potential shared "partnership" solution to secure
solid waste disposal capacity for the City of Toronto and the Greater Toronto Area Regional
Municipalities of Peel, York, and Durham.
Funding Sources, Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
There are no direct financial considerations arising from this report.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(10Council authorize the entering into of the Memorandum of Understanding (attached as
Appendix A to this report) setting out a protocol for the co-operation between the City of
Toronto and the Regional Municipalities of Peel, York, and Durham leading to potential
decisions for a shared solution or partnership in securing solid waste disposal capacity; and
(20Council receive the respective conditions related to participation (listed as Appendix B
to this report) as adopted by the Regional Municipalities of Peel, York, and Durham, as per
Clause No. 9 of the Memorandum of Understanding.
Reference/Background/History:
On October 2, 1998, City Council provided direction to the Commissioner of Works and
Emergency Services to:
"¼immediately proceed to engage the marketplace to secure solid waste management options
including waste diversion and disposal capacity to meet the City's long-term requirements
through a Request for Expressions of Interest and Request for Proposals process based on the
work undertaken in the planning process to date, but without proceeding to the submission of
an environmental assessment." (Clause No. 2 of Report No. 8 of the Works and Utilities
Committee).
Council also directed the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services to facilitate the
engagement of Regional governments in the Greater Toronto Area (the "GTA") as potential
partners with Toronto for future disposal capacity contracts.
At that time, Council also adopted a report dated September 30, 1998 from the Commissioner
of Works and Emergency Services which contained a recommendation to authorize the
Commissioner to engage the GTA Regional Commissioners of Public Works "¼for the
purposes of drafting a "Memorandum of Understanding" regarding the protocol for
inter-regional solid waste disposal planning and decision-making, which upon completion will
be submitted to his/her respective Councils for approval." (Recommendation No. 3 (ii)).
This report presents the proposed Memorandum of Understanding (the "MOU") developed by
the GTA Public Works Commissioners and the respective conditions under which the
Regional Municipalities of Peel, York, and Durham will participate.
Discussion and Justification:
Following Council direction to prepare a Memorandum of Understanding (the "MOU")
regarding the protocol for inter-regional solid waste disposal planning and decision-making,
the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services and staff of Solid Waste Management
Services began working through the GTA Commissioners' Round Table Forum on Solid
Waste Management ("the Commissioners' Round Table Forum") to develop and submit to
their respective Councils a workable MOU. The Commissioners' Round Table Forum has
held regular meetings since March 1998, regarding solid waste management matters.
After several meetings, the Commissioners Round Table Forum arrived at a consensus
regarding the wording of the MOU that is attached to this report as Appendix A.
Three Regional Councils have decided to participate under the MOU: Peel, York, and
Durham. Each of these Regions have adopted enabling motions to join in the MOU and have
submitted their solid waste tonnage projections for 2002 to 2022 to Toronto. These tonnage
projections have been factored into the REOI, and will be refined prior to the issue of the
RFP.
The Regional Council of Halton has decided not to participate through the MOU, but has
passed a recommendation stating that Halton wishes to participate in the diversion component
of SWM-MEP. Halton has approximately thirty-five years of disposal capacity at their
regional landfill near Milton. The Commissioners' Round Table Forum is currently drafting a
diversion oriented Terms of Reference to strengthen inter-regional co-operation and
information sharing regarding solid waste diversion.
The MOU sets the terms and conditions of the protocol leading to the decision points in which
there could be a shared solution ("partnership") by commitment of tonnages to a contract
under which a potential multi-regional "partnership" could take place. The MOU states that:
-participation by GTA Regions is voluntary;
-planning principles will be followed to identify waste disposal quantities;
-members will share and review information during the process;
-negotiations are the sole responsibility of Toronto; and
-members can attach conditions related to their participation.
In addition, the MOU has been designed to provide two additional decision points on the part
of Regions engaging with Toronto (Phase I is the initial decision to participate or not). In
Phase 2, following the identification of top-qualified proponents, a Region is required to
renew or not renew to continue participation with a view to a shared solution. This is to help
provide clarity (tonnages, geographic catchment area, etc.) before negotiations begin. In Phase
3, at the conclusion of the negotiations, a Region can become a "partner" through the passage
of a by-law to contract. The intent of these phases is to provide Regional Councils with the
ability to manage the extent of their engagement in the interests of their particular Region.
The attached MOU has been listed as Draft 6 (b), to reflect the decision by Halton to not
become a Member and to adjust the date of the document. Otherwise, it is the document
considered by the Regional Councils of Peel, York, and Durham.
Clause No. 9 of the attached MOU provides Regions with the opportunity to add to the MOU
additional conditions associated with their participation. Peel, York, and Durham have each
put forward conditions related to their respective participation. (These are recorded at
Appendix B attached to this report). As stated in Clause No. 9:
"¼these conditions do not bind other participating Members and are not assented to by their
inclusion in this memorandum; they, however, may guide an individual Member's ultimate
decision whether to "partner" with Toronto by the commitment of tonnage in any contract(s)
resulting from the engagement process."
Some of the conditions reflect the identified need of the participating Regions to continue to
conduct business-related contracts for solid waste management services (such as collection
and short-term disposal requirements) with firms which Toronto may be engaged in
negotiations with for disposal capacity. A protocol will be established at the Commissioner
level to deal with these conditions.
York Region has identified that it will be engaged in a parallel planning process for new
disposal capacity specific to its needs, but will not conduct negotiations while Toronto is in
negotiations, should the proponents under consideration be the same in each process.
Each of the three participating Regions has set a condition, related to their continuing
participation, that no new landfill site(s) be established in their respective Region.
Conclusions:
Following Council direction on October 2, 1998 to facilitate the engagement of Regional
Governments in the GTA, the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services engaged the
Commissioners' Round Table Forum in the development of a MOU which would provide a
protocol for decision-making leading to a potential partnership for future disposal capacity
contracts involving Toronto and the Regional Municipalities of the GTA.
The Regional Municipalities of Peel, York, and Durham, have agreed to participate with
Toronto through the MOU. Each of these Regions has included, with their agreement to
participate conditions which are not binding on other parties, but which guide their respective
decision-making for any ultimate commitment to contract.
The Regional Municipality of Halton has decided not to participate through the MOU but has
identified a willingness to participate in the diversion component of Toronto's Solid Waste
Management Marketplace Engagement Process.
We recommend the adoption of the attached MOU and the receipt of the attached conditions
put forward by the three participating Regional Municipalities.
Contact Name:
Lawson Oates, B.A., M.E.S.
Manager, Strategic Planning
Solid Waste Management Services
Works and Emergency Services
Phone: (416) 392-9744
FAX: (416) 392-4745
E-mail: lawson_oates@metrodesk.metrotor.on.ca
Angelos Bacopoulos, P.Eng. Barry H. Gutteridge
General ManagerCommissioner
Solid Waste Management Services Works and Emergency Services
att.
LJO/ljo:md/gtamou
Appendix A
Memorandum of Understanding
Regarding a Potential Greater Toronto Area Partnership to Secure Long-term
Solid Waste Disposal Capacity
DRAFT #6(b)
February 12, 1999
Introduction
On October 2, 1998, Toronto City Council moved to formally invite the Regional
Governments of the Greater Toronto Area (Durham, York, Peel, and Halton) to enter into a
potential partnership with Toronto in its proposal call for long-term solid waste disposal
capacity by:
(i)declaring through Council motion an "Expression of Interest"; and
(ii)requesting their Commissioners of Public Works (or designates) to meet with Toronto's
Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services for the purposes of drafting a
"Memorandum of Understanding" [hereinafter referred to as the "MOU"] regarding the
protocol for inter-regional solid waste disposal planning and decision-making, which, upon
completion, will be submitted to his/her respective Councils for approval.
Toronto City Council also initiated at that time the Solid Waste Management Marketplace
Engagement Process ("SWM-MEP") which is designed to provide new disposal capacity prior
to the projected 2002 closure date of Toronto's remaining in-service landfill, the Keele Valley
Landfill Site. This landfill site currently provides disposal capacity for Toronto, York, and
Durham, in addition to servicing the needs of a portion of the private sector's waste disposal
needs.
Listed below is a Statement of Principles for Participation that contains the protocol involved
in and the conditions of participation leading to the potential partnership arrangement.
Statement of Principles for Participation
The undersigned members of the Greater Toronto Area (the "Members") agree to collaborate
in the engagement of the marketplace to supply long-term solid waste disposal capacity (the
"engagement process") based on the following conditions of participation:
1.Participation shall be voluntary on the part of all Members and any Member may
withdraw from the engagement process at any time subject to clause 7 of this MOU.
2.In order to identify waste quantities required for disposal, Members will follow acceptable
solid waste management planning principles including the identification of waste diversion
targets, a public consultation process, and the preparation of study or planning documents.
3.Toronto will manage the engagement of the marketplace through the preparation and
issuance of a Request for Expressions of Interest (the "REOI") and a Request for Proposals
(the "RFP"), which incorporate, in addition to the base waste diversion and disposal quantities
for which Toronto is responsible, the waste diversion and disposal quantities resulting from
the planning undertaken by Members in clause 2. Information, in the form of submissions, at
the REOI and RFP stages will be shared by Toronto and the Members through their respective
Commissioners of Public Works. Toronto will be solely responsible for negotiations.
Toronto's Commissioner will consult with his counterparts prior to any major decisions either
advancing the evaluation process or any negotiations. Toronto will address any input by
Members. Any sharing and review of documents or of information received during the
evaluation process or in any negotiations may be subject to conditions requiring
confidentiality by Member staff and councillors.
4.It is acknowledged that Toronto shall be solely responsible for any obligations to
proponents in the engagement process subject to any subsequent contractual commitments of
Members under clause 7 of this MOU.
5.The Members' Commissioners of Public Works will review the draft REOI and RFP
evaluation criteria prior to issuance of the documents. It is acknowledged that any input may
be subject to timelines for such input adopted by Toronto Council.
6.All Members will provide to Toronto their best estimate of their long-term disposal needs
based on the planning undertaken under clause 2 of this MOU prior to the issue of the REOI,
and the then most current disposal capacity requirements prior to the issuance of the RFP.
7.Members will be kept informed of developments in the engagement process by periodic
reports from Toronto's Commissioner to the Members' respective Commissioners. Members
will be advised by advance notice of two months of the decision point prior to Toronto
executing a contract(s) with a successful proponent or proponents. Members must decide at
this point whether or not to "partner" with Toronto by passage of an appropriate by-law to
contract for the relevant tonnages in the contract(s) with the successful proponent(s) or with
Toronto, as the case may be.
8.Each Member shall, following the identification of the top qualified proposals (i.e. the
outcome from the RFP submissions evaluation) and prior to Toronto engaging the top
qualified proposals in contract agreement negotiations, decide to renew (or not to renew) their
commitment to a GTA shared solution (i.e., by commitment of tonnage). A decision to renew
shall be made by adoption of a resolution to that effect and within a timeframe consistent with
the project schedule as adopted by Toronto Council. Members who decide to renew shall not
conduct separate negotiations with the top qualified proponents from after the point that
members are notified that Toronto City Council has authorized negotiations with those
proponents and up to execution of contract(s).
9.The attached appendices contain conditions or principles adopted by individual Members
which currently address specific interests or concerns associated with those Members'
participation. These conditions or principles do not bind other participating Members and are
not assented to by their inclusion in this memorandum; they, however, may guide an
individual Member's ultimate decision whether to "partner" with Toronto by the commitment
of tonnage in any contract(s) resulting from the engagement process. It is acknowledged that
such expressed conditions or principles shall not be deemed to be specific conditions or
criteria to be addressed in Toronto's REOI or RFP, but may be factors to be evaluated under
the general criteria contained in the proposal process as described to date in the planning
documents.
Dated February 12, 1999
For the Regional Municipality of Durham For the Regional Municipality of York
For the City of Toronto For the Regional Municipality of Peel
LJO/ljo:md/jea98
Appendix B
Conditions Passed by the Regional Municipalities of Peel, York, and Durham, Under Clause
No. 9 of the "Memorandum of Understanding Regarding a Potential Greater Toronto Area
Partnership to Secure Long-term Solid Waste Disposal Capacity"
Regional Municipality of Peel. March 3, 1999.
"That the Regional Municipality of Peel enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
with the City of Toronto, regarding a potential Greater Toronto Area partnership to secure
long-term waste disposal capacity;
"And further, that the Memorandum include the following conditions specific to the Region of
Peel:
a)that no new landfill site(s) be established in the Region of Peel;
b)that existing landfill capacity in the Region of Peel not be utilized for the City of
Toronto's landfill needs;
c)that the Region of Peel may conduct separate negotiations with any service provider for
short term Regional waste management services, while the City of Toronto is negotiating with
qualified proponents for long-term waste management services;
d)notwithstanding Clause 7 of Draft # 6 of the Memorandum of Understanding which states
that, "Members will be advised by advance notice of two months of the decision point prior to
Toronto executing a contract(s), with a successful proponent or proponents," Peel Regional
Council will through its member, review any decision point and report back to the City as to,
"whether or not to partner with Toronto by passage of an appropriate by-law to contract for the
relevant tonnages."
And further, that a copy of the report and the corresponding resolution be forwarded to the
City of Toronto, to be appended to the Memorandum of Understanding, as per Clause 9 of the
MOU.
Regional Municipality of York. January 28, 1999.
1."That the Regional Chair and Regional Clerk be authorized to execute a Memorandum of
Understanding with the City of Toronto regarding a potential Greater Toronto Area
partnership to secure long-term solid waste disposal capacity, in a form similar to that shown
as Attachment 1, and as outlined in this report, subject to the particular concerns pertaining to
York Region as noted in the text of this report being adequately addressed."
2."That Regional Council endorse the Region's preliminary diversion rates and
corresponding disposal quantities for incorporation into the City of Toronto's Request for
Expressions of Interest document, as outlined in this report."
[Conditions.]
1."That there be no new landfill capacity established in York Region."
2."That the Region continue to give priority to waste diversion over waste disposal in
structuring the Region's waste management system; and, that contracts for the disposal of the
Region's waste be structured to reflect both the ongoing and intended future target
performance of the Region's waste diversion program."
3."That export of the Region's waste to disposal facilities outside the Region be considered;
and, that that process of consideration incorporate an awareness of the host community's
positions on the waste disposal facilities proposed to receive the Region's waste."
4."That export of the Region's waste to facilities in the United States (U.S.) be considered in
addition to facilities located in Ontario, but that in comparatively evaluating the U.S. facilities
to Ontario facilities, priority be given to facilities which benefit Ontario in terms of jobs and
economic investment; the degree of priority assigned should be developed through further
public consultation."
5."That waste incineration with energy recovery (EFW) be considered as a waste disposal
technology in addition to landfill; and, that any specific proposals for EFW be comparatively
evaluated with landfill proposals, utilizing criteria which address macro environmental
impacts (including health and safety, natural environment, energy resource management) as
well as the matter of Ontario benefits and financial cost."
6."That proposals involving EFW facilities located in the Region be considered and
comparatively evaluated in the manner described immediately above; and that the process of
consideration involve detailed consultation with the host area municipality and immediate
community with the objective of establishing the elements of a "community-facility
performance agreement" addressing matters including but not limited to: environmental
performance, performance monitoring and reporting, and non-performance penalty and
compensation."
7."That proposals involving waste from York Region and other GTA Regions and Toronto
transferring through transfer facilities in York Region for disposal at facilities outside the
Region, be considered; and that such consideration place significant priority upon measures to
ensure that potential land use and transportation impacts are fully mitigated."
8."That proposals to manage the Region's waste disposal tonnages be permitted to include
tonnages from the ( [sic] industrial, commercial and institutional sector, provided that the
Region's waste disposal capacity needs have priority."
9."That the Region entertain offers from the waste disposal marketplace which could
involve the Region as a partner in the form of the Region having an equity interest in
facilities."
10."That the Region should continue with the "dual track" approach to long term solid waste
disposal planning, namely involving: the Region continuing to participate with Toronto and
other GTA regional municipalities in consultations directed at establishing a framework for
the participating GTA municipalities identifying a shared solution for their long term waste
disposal capacity needs; that subject to a satisfactory framework being identified and manifest
in a Memorandum of Understanding, the Region provide the City of Toronto with ranges of
waste disposal tonnage needs which quantity would be integrated into Toronto's waste
disposal marketplace request for expressions of interest and detailed proposal call; and that, in
parallel to the Region participating in the GTA/Toronto process, the Region initiate a process
of canvassing the waste disposal marketplace for proposals to address the waste disposal
capacity needs of the Region only."
[In addition, in the body of the report before York Regional Council, the following appendices
were listed and adopted for inclusion as additional conditions:]
"Condition No. 8 of this MOU is interpreted to not prohibit York Region from engaging the
marketplace through issuance of requests for proposals and negotiating with any proponents
submitting proposals pertaining to provision of solid waste disposal capacity for York
Region's disposal quantities. Pursuant to the latter portion of Condition No. 8, if York Region
renews its commitment to the GTA shared solution approach, York Region will not negotiate
with the top qualified proponents during the period Toronto is negotiating with these
proponents."
"York Region has the right under this MOU to carry out its own Request for Proposals for a
York only disposal solution and to conduct any negotiations with any proponents in the time
periods before and after the City of Toronto is negotiating with its top qualified proponents.
Furthermore, if York's top qualified proponents are different than Toronto's top qualified
proponents, then York has the right under this MOU to conduct its negotiations at the same
time as Toronto is conducting negotiations."
Regional Municipality of Durham. January 19, 1999
"That the Region of Durham enter into a Memorandum of Understanding regarding a potential
Greater Toronto Area partnership to secure long term waste disposal capacity and that the
Memorandum include the following conditions specific to the Region of Durham:"
1.That no new landfill site(s) be established in the Region of Durham;
2.That Energy from Waste or Refuse Derived Fuel facilities be considered;
3.That new emerging waste disposal technologies be considered;
4.That the Region may conduct separate negotiations with any service provider for short
term Regional waste disposal services while Toronto is negotiating with top qualified
proponents for long term waste disposal services."