WESTON BUSINESS COMMUNITY STREET AUDIT
Ward 27, York Humber.
Chair, Weston Business Community
(February 9, 1999)
Weston Business Community
Street Audit
Summary & Recommendations
February 5, 1999
Prepared by the Street Audit Working Group
Table of Contents
1.0 BACKGROUND
2.0 LIGHTING
3.0 TRAFFIC & SIGNAGE
4.0 MUNICIPAL STANDARDS
5.0 SECURITY7
6.0 GARBAGE
7.0 STREETSCAPE
8.0 LOITERING
9.0 POLICING
10.0 LANE-WAYS
11.0 SIGHT LINES
APPENDICES:
Appendix 1List of Participants, July 9, 1998
Appendix 2CPTED Principles
Appendix 3Rear Lane System
Appendix 4Areas identified for Lighting Deficiencies
CONTACTS:
David Hessels, City of Toronto, Economic Development Division
Maggie Knap, Office of Councillor Frances Nunziata
John Kiru, Weston Business Community
Joe Torzsok, Office of Councillor Bill Saundercook
1.0Background
Safety Audits are a process that brings individuals together to walk through a physical
environment, evaluate how safe it feels to them, identify ways to make the space safer, and
organize to bring about those changes. Safety Audits make use of the principles of Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED), described in Appendix 2.
In response to a number of issues threatening the well-being of the Weston community, the
Weston Business Community approached their local Councillor about the possibility of
organizing a Safety Audit in the Weston Area.
Staff from the Toronto Police Service and various City departments were brought together
with residents, business people and community organizations to complete an audit on July 9,
1998. Over 50 residents and representatives from various organizations attended, including
members of the Weston Business Community, Weston Ratepayers, 12 & 31 Division Police
Officers, 12 Division CPLC representatives, both local Councillors, Toronto Hydro staff,
Municipal Standards and Economic Development staff, Friends for Friends representatives,
and staff from CAN DO and the Black Creek Business Area Association. Support and advice
was also provided by representatives from Parkdale Community Watch (the list of participants
is attached as Appendix 1).
Comments from Audit participants were collected verbally during the audit and through
surveys distributed to each of the participants. A follow-up session involving the Street Audit
Working Group and Toronto Police Service Officers was held on September 29, 1998 to
collect additional information and survey lighting conditions (see Appendix 4).
This report summarizes the issues which were identified during the Audit and recommends
future actions.
2.0Lighting
2.1Comment
Through the Street Audit, participants identified a large number of public and private areas
where lighting is deficient or where additional lighting would improve the perception of safety
(see Attachment 4).
2.1.1Streets & Parks
Several properties were identified as having inadequate lighting along a major street or in
main entry-ways. Along Weston Road there are two sets of light standards, utility pole
fixtures which provide lighting to the street and ornamental light standards, which provide
additional lighting to sidewalks.
Representatives of the Weston Business Community indicated that repairs are planned to
upgrade and increase the wattage of ornamental fixtures, to improve the downward flow of
light. A few instances were identified where bulbs should be replaced.
Utility pole-mounted fixtures are the primary source of lighting to the street and boulevard.
However, along several sections of the street there are no fixtures in place and lighting
appears to be deficient. Other locations where bulbs should be replaced were also noted.
2.1.2Private Properties & Lane-ways
Street Audit participants indicated that with few exceptions, lighting along side and rear
lane-ways is substandard. Areas of inadequate lighting are very often the same areas Police
refer to as problem areas for crime.
In sections of public lane-way, where lighting is maintained by Toronto Hydro, deficiencies
and fixtures requiring repair or replacement were noted. However, many lane-ways are
privately owned and utility-mounted fixtures are non-existent. Given the expense involved in
installing new poles with lighting, Police and Hydro staff on hand recommended that property
owners install sodium lights or motion sensors at the rear of their buildings.
2.1.3Parking Areas
On the evening of the audit, several parking facilities did not have adequate lighting or
fixtures were not turned on. Audit participants were hesitant about entering these areas, even
in the presence of Police. In order to 'reclaim' the safety of these areas during evening hours,
communications must occur with property owners and any action which is available through
Munipal Standards should be taken.
2.2Recommendations
2.2.1That Community Council request Toronto Hydro to report on the status of installing
utility pole-mounted light fixtures within sections of Weston Road identified as being
deficient.
2.2.2That Community Council request Toronto Hydro to report on the status of upgrades or
repairs to lighting in areas of public lane where lighting was identified a being deficient.
2.2.3That communications occur with property owners as per recommendation 5.2.2.
2.2.4The Street Audit Working Group will inform the Municipal Standards Division of
addresses of private properties where inadequate lighting affects community safety or
perception for action.
3.0Traffic & Signage
3.1Comment
Participants indicated that the flashing hand signals at Lawrence Avenue West & Weston
Road are too short and do not allow pedestrians, particularly senior citizens living in the area,
to safely cross Lawrence Avenue West.
A stop sign has recently been installed on King Street at George Street to slow traffic adjacent
to H.J. Alexander Junior Public School. Participants noted that because drivers are not
accustomed to the stop, cars have been seen driving through the intersection without stopping.
There was concern for pedestrian safety, particularly given its location, adjacent to a school. It
was suggested that a flashing red light could be added above the sign, at least as a temporary
measure. A painted white line would also encourage cars to stop.
At the 'T' intersection of John Street & Weston Road, there is no left turn from John Street
onto Weston. Concern was expressed that the sign indicating 'no-left' is quite small and
frequently ignored. This is particularly a concern for pedestrians crossing Weston and causes
additional congestion at this already busy intersection. Police staff suggested replacing the
green light with a right-pointing arrowed green to make it more clear to drivers that a left turn
is prohibited. There is also a problem with the pedestrian crossing at this intersection, as it
takes a considerable amount of time for the light to change after the cross-walk has been
activated. The inconvenience of using the cross-walk encourages pedestrians to jaywalk.
The tendency of people to park on John Street near the intersection of Weston Road results in
problems for TTC buses and other vehicles turning right off of Weston. Buses are often forced
to turn into oncoming traffic to avoid parked cars.
Traffic flow and circulation in the lane-ways and parking areas behind Weston Road from
John Street to Elsmere Avenue is confusing and has lead to several minor traffic accidents.
Participants in the Street Audit noted that a stop sign which was located where the lane-way
meets Elsmere Avenue was damaged and never replaced. It is not clear to drivers which
sections are one-way. Analysis of traffic flow in this busy area is needed to determine what
additional signage is necessary. Meetings with property and business owners may be required
as this issue relates to the access to private parking areas.
It was also noted that one of the parking meters on Weston Road is damaged and will require
a new post.
3.2Recommendations
3.2.1That the Commissioner of Works & Emergency Services be asked to report to
Community Council on the status of the following issues:
·Introduction of a new signage or other lane-way improvements to correct traffic flow
problems in the lane-way on the east side of Weston Road, north of John Street, and on
Elsmere Avenue.
·Crossing signal intervals at the intersections of Weston Road & Lawrence Avenue West
and Weston Road & John Street.
·The creation of a 'no-stopping' zone along the section of John Street closest to Weston
Road.
·The feasibility of installing a flashing red light and painted line at the intersection of King
Street and George Street.
·Replacement of the existing green light at the intersection of John Street and Weston Road
with an arrowed signal (right only).
·Repair or replacement of broken parking meter in front of 1825 Weston Rd.
4.0Municipal Standards
4.1Comment
Neglect for the appearance of many properties was seen as major concern of Street Audit
participants. Poor maintenance relates to the image and perception of the area and has a
cumulative impact on the area's ability to attract customers and on the livelihood of its
businesses. In order for Weston to promote its identity as a village within a large city, some of
its 'big city' issues must first be dealt with.
A higher standard of care is achievable through use of the City's Property Standards By-law
and a policy of zero tolerance. This approach requires that residents, property owners and
businesses make municipal officials aware of un-kept, substandard, or dangerous properties
and that action be taken in a timely manner.
The principal issues which were identified are as follows:
·Presence of refuse, debris and garbage in rear lane-ways and adjacent to lane-ways was
frequently noted. In some instances there were piles of building materials or garbage which
should be removed;
·Overgrown weeds in lane-ways, along fence lines, and on vacant properties. In some cases
weeds interfere with sight lines and obscure passive surveillance of parking areas;
·Shrubbery that obscures views from the street, which could act as a hiding place;
·Several buildings were identified for maintenance issues, mainly related to facades; and
·In some instances there were derelict vehicles which must be removed.
4.2Recommendations
4.2.1The Street Audit Working Group will forward problem addresses and issues identified
to the Municipal Standards Division for action.
5.0Security
5.1Comment
Issues of security which were identified relate to buildings that are not secured, un-gated
access to lane-ways between stores, access to rear yards, and impediments to the natural
surveillance of public and private space. Complicated with issues of property standards and
poor lighting, these areas can become centres of illicit activity, targets for vandalism, and pose
risks of breaking and entering.
In many situations, Audit participants were concerned by narrow lane-ways between
buildings, which are un-gated and unlit. Lane-ways which do not provide principal access to
commercial or residential units should be fenced or gated. The external face of the fence or
gate should be constructed to prevent climbing and gates should be locked to eliminate
unwanted access to these spaces. The lane-way fence adjacent to 1935 Weston Road was
suggested as a desirable treatment.
The areas behind Weston Road stores were of most concern from a security standpoint. In
many cases, fences between rear yards are either in a poor state of repair or there are gaps
between them. It was suggested that if the rear yard area has good surveillance from a public
street or from several dwelling units a secure see-through fence is preferred. If there is not an
opportunity for pedestrians or residents to see any activity in the area, a solid screen fence is
suitable (the public and private rear lane system is shown in Appendix 3).
Often rear lane-ways are not continuous, creating concealed 'hot spots' where Police
encounter problems of drugs, loitering and prostitution. In addition to improving maintenance
and lighting of these areas, heavy vegetation should be trimmed back and fencing should be
upgraded to prevent access.
Several businesses have installed bars or shielding over their windows. Such work is not
encouraged because it merely contributes to a perception of the area as being unsafe.
Shielding can, in fact, increase the chances of breaking and entering, since passers-by cannot
see what is going on inside the store. Instead, Police recommend interior lighting which
permits a good view of the inside of the store at all times and provides additional lighting to
the public sidewalk. On the evening of the Audit, several stores were not lit.
In one instance an exit stairway from an underground parking structure was unlit and out of
public view.
5.2Recommendations
5.2.1The Street Audit Working Group will forward a list of locations where the condition or
lack of fencing or gating poses a risk to the security of the area to the Municipal Standards
Division for action.
5.2.2Education & Communication Plan
Most of the issues noted above with respect to rear or side lane-ways relate to private
property. Virtually all of these concerns could be remedied by private property owners at a
very nominal expense, improving the security and marketability of their buildings. In these
instances, by-law enforcement may not be the most effective option. A program of education
and one-on-one communication with owners and tenants would create much greater 'buy-in'.
It is recommended that representatives of the Weston Business Community, Street Audit
participants, 12 Division Police representatives, and City staff meet to develop a
communication plan identifying ways in which businesses, residents and property owners can
contribute to making the area safer through CPTED principles. This plan could involve a
brochure identifying:
·Cost-effective rear lane lighting treatments;
·Fencing and gating options for rear and side lane-ways;
·Suitable standards for doors, locks, interior lighting, and window treatment;
·Municipal Standards requirements; and
·'Good habits' which will discourage vandalism and breaking and entering.
6.0Garbage
6.1Comment
Several issues were identified with respect to the manner in which garbage from businesses
and apartments is placed on the curb for collection and the presence of litter on the street.
Municipal by-laws require that garbage placed on the curb for collection be enclosed in cans
or large green bags, tied securely. On the evening of the Audit, participants witnessed
household garbage placed on the curb in piles or in grocery bags. This creates a shabby
appearance for the street and contributes to blowing litter, which collects elsewhere.
As many of the sidewalks on Weston Road are quite narrow, improperly placed garbage
interferes with shoppers and others using the street. In addition, garbage is often set out days
before the scheduled collection.
In some cases garbage from the stores and apartments has been placed improperly, in the
pedestrian garbage receptacles. Locations were identified where additional pedestrian
receptacles are needed.
Placement of garbage in the proper manner is a difficult standard to enforce, particularly when
it relates to residential tenants living above the stores.
Several locations were also identified where there are piles of garbage or building materials on
vacant properties or rear lanes.
6.2Recommendations
6.2.1The Street Audit Working Group, with the assistance of staff, will prepare a Waste
Collection Calendar for businesses and tenants, indicating the garbage collection schedule for
Weston Road and Lawrence Avenue West and proper manner in which garbage should be
placed for collection.
6.2.2The Street Audit Working Group will provide the addresses of properties identified for
infractions to the Municipal Standards Division for action.
7.0Streetscape
7.1Comment
With respect to Streetscaping, the primary concern of Street Audit participants was the
narrowness of sidewalks on Weston Road, particularly given the high volumes and speed of
traffic to and from Highway 401. Toronto Transportation Surveys indicate that as many as
20,517 vehicles use Weston Road in a given day. A new pedestrian operated traffic light was
installed just north of Wilby Crescent after a pedestrian was struck.
Creative design solutions are needed to increase the comfort level for pedestrians on this main
arterial. Some of the potential initiatives identified by Audit participants included:
·Creating Parking Bays on Weston Road, to separate pedestrian areas from traffic;
·Weston is the "Home of the Bicycle" - a dedicated bicycle lane would create a more
comfortable distance between pedestrians and passing traffic; and
·'Sidewalk clutter' should be reduced by:
·Moving newspaper boxes which obstruct pedestrian traffic;
·Removing surplus TTC poles (located on King Street and Weston Road); and
·Relocating Consumers Gas lines which protrude from the sidewalk.
With respect to improving image and aesthetics of the Weston area the following initiatives
were discussed:
·Increasing the number of pedestrian garbage receptacles (Attention should be given to
maintaining a consistent style of street furniture);
·Installing additional bicycle racks in appropriate locations; and
·Improving the pedestrian area on the north-east corner of Weston Rd. and Lawrence Ave.
W., in front of 1901 Weston Road (the Weston Business Community has since undertaken a
streetscaping project on this corner).
Access between Little Avenue Park and Cruikshank Park was also raised by Street Audit
participants. Currently there is no sidewalk or stairway connecting the two parks and due to
the change in grade pedestrians must walk on the street. It was felt that a direct landscaped
linkage between the two parks would improve safety and accentuate Little Avenue Park as an
attractive feature of Weston.
7.2Recommendations
7.2.1That Community Council request Consumers Gas to relocate gas lines which protrude
from the public sidewalk on Weston Road.
7.2.2That the following elements be taken into account in any Transportation Services
Division reconstruction projects or in any planned or ongoing Capital programs on Weston
Road:
·Creating Parking Bays on Weston Road;
·Dedicating a bicycle lane on Weston Road;
·Increasing the number of pedestrian garbage receptacles; and
·Installing additional bicycle racks in appropriate locations.
7.2.3That copies of this report be forwarded to the Commissioner of Urban Planning &
Development Services and Commissioner of Works & Emergency Services.
7.2.4That the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture & Tourism be requested to
investigate opportunities to create a pedestrian connection between Little Avenue Park and
Cruikshank Park.
8.0Loitering
8.1Comment
The issue of loitering is connected to problems of prostitution and sale of drugs. Audit
participants felt that an increased police presence in the form of foot patrols may be used to
discourage loitering without interfering with the residents' enjoyment of the street.
Lighting improvements identified in section 2 would also have the effect of discouraging
loitering.
Initiatives are underway to eliminate unnecessary pay phone booths in the area, and restrict the
hours in which phones may be used for non-emergency calls. The purpose of these initiatives
is to eliminate opportunities for drug dealers to use the phones during evening hours.
Additional unnecessary pay phones were identified and the cooperation of property owners
and Bell Canada will be sought to have these booths removed.
8.2Recommendations
8.2.1That Community Council request the Chief of Police to increase Police foot patrols in
the Weston Road/Lawrence Avenue area, particularly in the rear lane areas south of Lawrence
Avenue West.
8.2.2The Street Audit Working Group will communicate with property owners and Bell
Canada regarding the removal of unneeded pay phones.
9.0Policing
9.1Comment
Lawrence Avenue West is the dividing line between 12 Division and 31 Division of the
Toronto Police Service. 31 Division has two dedicated Police Officers for the areas of Weston
north of Lawrence Avenue West. There was concern expressed, however, that foot patrols
should be increased in the areas south of Lawrence Avenue West. 12 Division may require
additional resources to meet this need. Attention should be focused on monitoring concealed
rear lane areas, to discourage loitering and illegal activity.
Residents and community representatives should be encouraged to communicate with 12 and
31 Division Police on issues affecting community safety, by contacting P.C. Lambe, 808-1208
(12 Division) or P.C. Harris, 808-3108 (31 Division) or through the Community Police
Liaison Committees. For emergency matters call 911.
9.2Recommendations
9.2.1As part of the Education & Communication Plan, identified in Recommendation 5.2.2,
the Community should be informed of the CPLC's role in dealing with problem properties
and businesses should be encouraged to become more involved in the CPLC.
10.0Lane-ways
10.1Comment
Many of the issues identified in terms of lighting, maintenance and security of rear lane-ways
relate to the traffic pattern of lane-ways. Many of the rear lane-ways are not continuous, they
often serve only a few properties and are separated from adjacent lanes with fencing.
The side lane-ways which provide access to these rear lane parking areas are also a concern.
Greater passive surveillance would be achieved by creating a continuous lane system through
the rear of each property, eliminating unlit, un-kept 'pockets' around fences. In addition, a
continuous lane system would allow for garbage collection at the rear of the properties, rather
than on Weston Road.
10.2Recommendations
10.2.1That the Commissioner of Corporate Services be asked to report on the feasibility and
cost of creating a continuous public rear lane between John Street and South Station Street as
shown in Attachment 3, and upgrading public rear lanes as necessary to allow continuous
access and garbage collection.
11.0Sight Lines
11.1Comment
Preservation of sight lines for pedestrians and passing motorists is critical to the principles of
CPTED. In various locations, shrubbery or overgrown vegetation was identified which
obscures views from the street and other activity areas. In other situations, improvements to
buildings or construction of fencing are required to eliminate concealed spaces. Some of these
issues may be dealt with through Municipal Standards as they relate to routine maintenance.
Other issues will require communication with the property owners to explain the potential
problem and recommend cost-effective solutions.
11.2Recommendations
11.2.1That the Commissioner of Economic Development, Culture & Tourism request staff
to prune the trees in the public square at Weston Road & Lawrence Avenue West to improve
sight lines in the seating area.
11.2.2The Street Audit Working Group will provide the addresses of properties identified
for infractions to the Municipal Standards Division for action.
APPENDIX 1 - List of Participants, July 9, 1998
Carol BarberWeston Ratepayers
Lorne BergBlack Creek Business Area Association
Don BoyingtonResident
Frank BraceFriends For Friends
Roselyn BraceFriends For Friends
Marvin BrownFriends For Friends
Roy BrownResident
Tom BundaCentral Restaurant
Susan D'OliveiraParkdale Community Watch
B. DouglasResident
Mary FarraceResident
Pearl GoodmanResident
David HesselsCity of Toronto, Economic Development
Paul HoggToronto Police Service, 12 Division CRU
Glenn HoltParkdale Community Watch
Bridget JohnsonResident
Mark KinghamSt. John's Anglican Church
John KiruWeston Business Community
Maggie KnapOffice of Councillor Nunziata
James LambeToronto Police Service, 12 Division
Ellen LeeResident
Barry LoweWeston Business Community
Frank MammoneResident
Maria MammoneResident
Frances NunziataCouncillor, Ward 27
Richard NytkoToronto Hydro, York Division
Ray OehlerHealth Food Store
Joan OlahResident
Ken ParrintonToronto Police Service, 31 Division CRU
Antoinette PincenteResident
Terry PhebyToronto Police Service, 31 Division CRU
Carley SalaWeston Ratepayers
David SalaCity of Toronto, Municipal Standards
Bill SaundercookCouncillor, Ward 27
Shirley SimpsonResident
Barbara Spyropoulos12 Division CPLC
Wayne StumpResident
Marjorie SuttonMt. Dennis Community Association
Bonnie TaylorCAN DO
Suri WeinbergWeston Business Community
Tuffy ZidnerZidner Real Estate