STAFF REPORT
October 28, 1999
To: York Community Council
From: City Clerk
Subject: Poll Results: Proposal to Implement On-street Permit Parking on Rectory Road, Between Weston Road and
Coulter Avenue
Ward 27, York Humber
Purpose:
To show results of a poll conducted of residents on Rectory Road, regarding a proposal to implement on-street permit
parking.
Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
None.
Recommendation:
For the consideration and direction of York Community Council.
Background:
Clause No. 8 (t) embodied in Report No. 6 of the York Community Council
York Community Council, at its meeting held on May 26, 1999 directed that the City Clerk conduct a poll of residents on
Rectory Rd. to determine majority interest in the implementation of on-street permit parking.
Comments:
The following is a breakdown of the poll results, based on the number of replies returned:
Total No. Polled: 31
No. of Replies Received: 15 or 48%
No. of Replies In Favour: 4 or 27%
No. of Replies Not In Favour 11 or 73%
The following is an overall breakdown of responses, according to resident owners, non-resident owners and tenants:
|
Total #
Polled |
No. of Replies
Received (%) |
No. of Replies in
Favour (%) |
No. of Replies Opposed
(%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Resident
Owners |
20 |
13 (65%) |
4 (31%) |
9 (69%) |
Non-Resident
Owners |
4 |
1 (25%) |
0 |
1 (100%) |
Tenants |
7 |
1 (14%) |
0 |
1 (100%) |
TOTAL |
31 |
15 (48%) |
4 (27%) |
11 (73%) |
Conclusion:
As noted above, the majority of residents, based on the responses received, are not in favour of the proposal to implement
on-street permit parking on Rectory Road.
Contact:
Valerie D'Alessandro
Committee Secretary
394-2522
394-2803 (fax)
for Novina Wong
City Clerk
List of Attachments:
Comments from residents are attached hereto.
Attachment No. 1
Comments from Residents:
In Favour:
(a) After careful thought, I deem that this is the best solution to the garbage I pick up after visits to apartment buildings,
such as used condoms, dirty baby diapers and used disposable needles occasionally. I bought this house approximately five
years ago (corner lot, Rectory and Coulter) and called the police once re the noise (car alarms) and garbage on Coulter side
and was told by a very nice officer that there was basically nothing I could do since parking was permitted during certain
hours and days. I never called again, realizing that our police have better things to do and that the police would not be back
in the three-hour allotted time limit to ticket. Permit parking may promote better policing and road maintenance (snow
removal/plowing) in the future.
(b) I agree that a resident without a driveway should have access to a spot to park in front of their residence if at all
possible.
(c) People from other places park on Rectory for weeks at a time, leaving me to scramble for parking on other streets. I
tried a permit for Holley, but it was often parked up with people from the church there.
Having a permit to park in front of my own house would be a Godsend!
(d) I am currently paying $82.39 per year for street parking on Holley Avenue, which is not near my home. It would be
only appropriate as a homeowner and taxpayer to be allowed to park in front of my own home.
Not in Favour:
(a) Lack of parking space when having a guest, especially in winter when they're not clearing the road.
(b) Far too many children within the area to have cars parked on the roads. Road/street parking eliminates emergency
access. Most homes currently have a driveway
(c) Because most (if not all) of the people who live on Rectory Rd. have their private parking (driveways or otherwise), the
prospective car parkers would likely come from outside the immediate neighbourhood. We don't want them to come and
park here as this may jeopardize our security and safety.
(d) We were very surprised to find out that a petition is not now recognized by our local government. We as residents of
Rectory Road discussed the issue of "on-street parking" without our fellow neighbours when we received the first letter
dated August 17, 1999. We then decided amongst ourselves to put together a petition voicing our concerns re "on-street
parking".
It is also interesting that you have our signatures on the petition that was submitted; however, on this form that we are
required to fill out you do not require a signature.
(e) I am very happy with the way things are.
(f) Every house on Rectory has a driveway with adequate parking, except three houses on a short block between Coulter
and Windal. Maybe the five residents on this stretch should be polled separately. Also, there are no driveways on the west
side of this stretch to be hindered when the snow falls. Thank you for your consideration.
(g) With only three houses that don't have parking driveways, only people living on Weston Rd. would want passes. With
robberies on the increase it would bring a lot of people onto the street that don't live here. Snow removal is always slow
here and with cars parked at night it would be worse.
(h) Parking on street is bad enough now with the church two doors away. Snow removal is impossible now.
(i) Rectory Road is an unusually narrow street with no grassy boulevards. Snow banks make Rectory safe for one vehicle at
a time only as the only place to pile the snow is on the road. Cars park day and night in contravention of the current
maximum duration signs. As a result, the street in front of my house is never cleaned. On-street permit parking would only
make the problems worse.