City of Toronto   *
HomeContact UsHow Do I...? Advanced search Go
Living in TorontoDoing businessVisiting TorontoAccessing City Hall
 
Accessing City Hall
Mayor
Councillors
Meeting Schedules
   
   
  City of Toronto Council and Committees
  All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@toronto.ca.
   

 

Cedarvale Traffic Management Plan

Ward 28, York Eglinton

The York Community Council recommends that with regard to the Cedarvale Traffic Calming Survey Results, that:

(1) Items 1 to 5 in Table 1, Supporting Traffic Calming, be approved;

(2) the respective By-laws regarding Items 1 to 9 in Table 2, Opposed to Traffic Calming, be repealed;

(3) Item 10 in Table 2, Opposed to Traffic Calming, be approved;

(4) Items 1 and 2 in Table 3, Marginal Support for Traffic Calming, be approved;

(5) the City Solicitor be authorized to prepare road alteration by-laws for the individual street sections, where appropriate, and that public notice be given respecting those locations;

(6) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

The York Community Council submits the following report (September 10, 1999) from the Director, Transportation Services, District 1:

Purpose:

To provide results of the survey conducted of Cedarvale Community residents on various street blocks to determine majority support and preference to complete construction of the Cedarvale Traffic Management Plan.

Funding Sources:

The funds associated with the construction of the preferred traffic calming measures for each of the individual street sections supported by the majority of the municipally addressed property owners, estimated at $110,000.00, are contained in the Works and Emergency Services Department 1999 Capital Budget;

The funds associated with the construction of the preferred traffic calming measures on those individual street sections, where the responses were received from less than 50 percent of those polled, but the support from those who did respond is high, estimated at $60,000.00, are contained in the Works and Emergency Services Department 1999 Capital Budget.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

1. road alteration by-laws be prepared and public notice be given, for those individual street sections listed in Table 1 of the Appendix where the majority of municipally addressed property owners responded showing support for the preferred traffic calming measure; and

2. the York Community Council decide whether to proceed with the installation of the traffic calming plan on those individual street sections, listed in Table 3 of the Appendix where the number of responses received was not a majority, but the support for traffic calming is high, and if the decision is positive, road alteration by-laws be prepared and public notice given respecting these locations.

Background:

York Community Council, at its meeting of January 20, 1999, approved the following recommendation:

"That prior to the installation of the remaining pinch points and speed humps approved in the Cedarvale Traffic Management Plan, that the residents be polled on a block by block basis, requesting that they indicate their preference for either speed humps or pinch points on their respective blocks." (Clause No. 4(d) of Report No. 1 of theYork Community Council).

Comments:

The Cedarvale Traffic Management Plan was developed by a citizen task force, through an extensive public consultation process. The Traffic Plan consisted of numerous traffic calming measures aimed at reducing through traffic, reducing vehicular travel speeds, and improving pedestrian and cycling environments, to form a cohesive setting.

As a result the former City of York Council on June 25, 1997, approved the recommendations contained within the Cedarvale Community Traffic Plan within their jurisdictional control. Council further recommended the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto also approve those recommendations within their jurisdictional control, which was subsequently approved.

In late 1997, construction commenced on Phase I, which involved constructing twenty-one of the total forty traffic calming measures approved. For Council’s information, it was the decision of both the citizen traffic committee and the local Councillor to choose and request those twenty-one locations, within the allocated Capital Budget.

Phase II involves completing the remaining nineteen individual traffic calming measures, subject to results of a survey undertaken on an individual street block basis revealing majority support.

The attached Appendix details the results of the residents survey for each individual street section and the preferred traffic calming measure, according to resident owners, non-resident owners and tenants. The survey results have been divided into three categories. It was concluded that traffic calming is supported if more than 50 percent of property owners responded and more than 50 percent of those responses were favourable (Table 1). It was concluded that residents were opposed to traffic calming if 50 percent. of the responses were not favourable whether a majority of property owners responded or not (Table 2). However, there were two street sections where less than 50 percent. of property owners responded, but of those responses, there was a significant majority that were favourable (Table 3). These were considered to be "marginally supported" and it is requested that York Community Council provide direction on whether the traffic calming measures should be installed at these locations.

Conclusions:

The survey results have been categorized as follows:

Supporting Traffic Calming

  1. Camberwell Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue;
  2. 2. Dewbourne Avenue between Westover Hill Road and Menin Road;

  3. Dewbourne Avenue and Peveril Hill North;
  4. 4. Strathearn Road between Ava Road and Westover Hill Road;

  5. Strathearn Road between Chiltern Hill Road and Bathurst Street.
  6. Opposed to Traffic Calming

    1. Avenal Drive between Peveril Hill South and Bathurst Street;

  7. Dewbourne Avenue between Flanders Road and Westover Hill Road;
  8. 3. Dewbourne Avenue between Camberwell Road and Rostrevor Road;

  9. Flanders Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue;
  10. 5. Glen Cedar Road between Markdale Avenue and Strathearn Road;

  11. Rostrevor Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue;
  12. 7. Strathearn Road between Westover Hill Road and Warwick Avenue;

  13. Strathearn Road between Markdale Avenue and Glen Cedar Road;
  14. 9. Strathearn Road and Glen Cedar Road;

  15. Westover Hill Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue.
  16. Marginal Support for Traffic Calming

    1. Chiltren Hill Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue;

  17. Glen Cedar Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue.

Based on the survey results, the preferred traffic calming measures should be installed on those individual streets where there was support for traffic calming. Also, York Community Council is requested to decide whether the traffic calming measures should be installed on those individual streets where the number of responses received was clearly not a majority, but these responses did indicate support for traffic calming.

Contact Person:

Jacqueline White

Manager, Traffic Operations, District 1

397-5021

392-8504 (fax)

 

Cedarvale Traffic Calming

Survey Results

Table 1: Supporting Traffic Calming

 

 

 

Street

Section

% Responses Received

% Support

% No Support

Preferred Option

1.

Camberwell Road

Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue

54

68

32

Combination Speed hump and Narrowing

2.

Dewbourne Avenue

Westover Hill Road and Menin Road

70

71

29

Speed hump

3.

Dewbourne Avenue

Peveril Hill North and Dewbourne Avenue

100

67

33

Raised Pedestrian Crossing

4.

Strathearn Road

Ava Road and Westover Hill Road

52

64

36

Speed hump

5.

Strathearn Road

Chiltren Hill Road and Bathurst Street

74

83

17

Combination Speed hump and Narrowing

Table 2: Opposed to Traffic Calming

 

 

 

Street

Section

% Responses Received

% Support

% No Support

Preferred Option

1.

Avenal Drive

Peveril Hill South and Bathurst Street

33

0

100

None

2.

Dewbourne Avenue

Flanders Road and Westover Hill Road

40

25

75

None

3.

Dewbourne Avenue

Camberwell Road and Rostrevor Road

36

20

80

None

4.

Flanders Road

Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue

33

42

58

None

5.

Glen Cedar Road

Markdale Avenue and Strathearn Road

83

29

71

None

6.

Rostrevor Road

Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue

56

64

36

None

7.

Strathearn Road

Westover Hill Road and Warwick Avenue

64

33

67

None

8.

Strathearn Road

Markdale Avenue and Glen Cedar Road

60

44

56

None

9.

Strathearn Road

Strathearn Road and Glen Cedar Road

60

45

55

None

10.

Westover Hill Road

Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue

26

78

22

Speed hump

 

Table 3: Marginal Support for Traffic Calming

 

 

 

Street

Section

% Responses Received

% Support

% No Support

Preferred Option

1.

Chiltren Hill Road

Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue

44

67

33

Combination Speed hump and Narrowing

2.

Glen Cedar Road

Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue

46

67

33

Combination Speed hump and Narrowing

 

   
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@toronto.ca.

 

City maps | Get involved | Toronto links
© City of Toronto 1998-2005