City of Toronto   *
HomeContact UsHow Do I...? Advanced search Go
Living in TorontoDoing businessVisiting TorontoAccessing City Hall
 
Accessing City Hall
Mayor
Councillors
Meeting Schedules
   
   
  City of Toronto Council and Committees
  All Council and Committee documents are available from the City of Toronto Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@toronto.ca.
   

 

Draft By-law to Authorize the Alteration of Dewbourne Avenue

and Strathearn Road by the Implementation of Various Traffic

Calming Measures - Cedarvale Traffic Management Plan

Ward 28, York Eglinton

The York Community Council recommends that a by-law in the form of the Draft Dy-law be enacted and that the necessary Bills be introduced in Council to give effect thereto.

The York Commuity Council reports, for the information of Council, having held a public meeting regarding the aforementioned matter; and that pursuant to Clause No. 12 of Report No. 9 of the York Community Council, titled "Cedarvale Traffic Management Plan" as adopted by Council on September 28, 29 and 30, 1999, a notice with respect to the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was advertised in a daily newspaper on September 20, September 27, October 4 and October 11, 1999.

The York Community Council also reports, for the information of Council, having requested the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services to:

(1)expedite the process this year and install as soon as possible, the traffic calming measures approved in report the dated September 10, 1999 from the Director, Transportation Services, District 1, embodied in Clause No. 12 of Report No. 9 of the York Community Council, which was adopted without amendment by City Council on September 28, 29 & 30, 1999, viz, Items 1 to 5 in Table 1, Item 10 in Table 2 and Items 1 and 2 in Table 3;

(2)measure and report on the speed and volume of vehicles on the streets that have received traffic calming in Phase 1, such measurement to be conducted six months after for those streets in Phase II, and that this data and other statistics be used to evalue the traffic calming plan for the Cedarvale community; and

(3)also include in the report a list of the residents and their addresses who were polled in the Traffic Calming Survey.

The York Community Council submits the following Draft By-law from the City Solicitor:

Authority:Clause No. 12 of Report No. 9 of the York Community Council

Adopted by Council:September 28, 29 and 30, 1999.

CITY OF TORONTO

Bill No.

BY-LAW No.

To authorize the alteration of Dewbourne Avenue and Strathearn Road by the implementation of various traffic calming measures and to repeal By-law Nos. 3557-97, 3543-97 and 3538-97 of the former City of York.

WHEREAS notice of a proposed By-law regarding the proposed alterations of Dewbourne Avenue and Strathearn Road was published in a daily newspaper on September 20, September 27, October 4 and October 11, 1999 and interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard at a public meeting held on October 12, 1999 and it is appropriate to permit the alterations;

AND WHEREAS By-law Nos. 3557-97, 3543-97 and 3538-97 of the former City of York were enacted as part of the implementation of the Cedarvale Traffic Management Plan and should be repealed as a result of certain proposed modifications with respect to Dewbourne Avenue and Strathearn Road.

The Council of the City of Toronto HEREBY ENACTS as follows:

A.The following alterations are authorized:

1.The alteration of Dewbourne Avenue at a distance of 30 metres west of Menin Road, by constructing a speed hump with a maximum height of 80 mm, as shown on the drawing attached as Schedule "A" to this By-law;

2.The alteration of Strathearn Road at a distance of 105 metres south of Ava Road, by constructing a speed hump with a maximum height of 80 mm, as shown on the drawing attached as Schedule "A" to this By-law; and,

3.The alteration of Strathearn Road at a distance of 130 metres east of Chiltren Hill Road, by constructing a speed hump with a maximum height of 80 mm, together with a curbed narrowing, as shown on the drawing attached as Schedule "A" to this By-law.

  B.The following By-laws of the former City of York are repealed:

1.By-law No. 3557-97, being "A By-law To Authorize the alteration of Dewbourne Avenue, in the City of York."

2.By-law No. 3543-97, being "A By-law To Authorize the alteration of Strathearn Road, in the City of York."

3.By-law No. 3538-97, being "A By-law To Authorize the alteration of Strathearn Road, in the City of York."

ENACTED AND PASSED thisday of, A.D. 1999.

  MayorClerk

The York Community Council also submits Clause No. 12 of Report No. 9 of the York Community Council, titled "Cedarvale Traffic Management Plan" which was adopted by City Council at its meeting held on September 28, 29 and 30, 1999:

(City Council, on September 28, 29 and 30, 1999, adopted this Clause without amendment.)

The York Community Council recommends that with regard to the Cedarvale Traffic Calming Survey Results, that:

(1)Items 1 to 5 in Table 1, Supporting Traffic Calming, be approved;

(2)the respective By-laws regarding Items 1 to 9 in Table 2, Opposed to Traffic Calming, be repealed;

(3)Item 10 in Table 2, Opposed to Traffic Calming, be approved;

(4)Items 1 and 2 in Table 3, Marginal Support for Traffic Calming, be approved;

(5)the City Solicitor be authorized to prepare road alteration by-laws for the individual street sections, where appropriate, and that public notice be given respecting those locations;

(6)the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

  The York Community Council submits the following report (September 10, 1999) from the Director, Transportation Services, District 1:

Purpose:

To provide results of the survey conducted of Cedarvale Community residents on various street blocks to determine majority support and preference to complete construction of the Cedarvale Traffic Management Plan.

Funding Sources:

The funds associated with the construction of the preferred traffic calming measures for each of the individual street sections supported by the majority of the municipally addressed property owners, estimated at $110,000.00, are contained in the Works and Emergency Services Department 1999 Capital Budget;

The funds associated with the construction of the preferred traffic calming measures on those individual street sections, where the responses were received from less than 50 percent of those polled, but the support from those who did respond is high, estimated at $60,000.00, are contained in the Works and Emergency Services Department 1999 Capital Budget.

Recommendations:

It is recommended that:

1.road alteration by-laws be prepared and public notice be given, for those individual street sections listed in Table 1 of the Appendix where the majority of municipally addressed property owners responded showing support for the preferred traffic calming measure; and

2.the York Community Council decide whether to proceed with the installation of the traffic calming plan on those individual street sections, listed in Table 3 of the Appendix where the number of responses received was not a majority, but the support for traffic calming is high, and if the decision is positive, road alteration by-laws be prepared and public notice given respecting these locations.

Background:

York Community Council, at its meeting of January 20, 1999, approved the following recommendation:

"That prior to the installation of the remaining pinch points and speed humps approved in the Cedarvale Traffic Management Plan, that the residents be polled on a block by block basis, requesting that they indicate their preference for either speed humps or pinch points on their respective blocks." (Clause No. 4(d) of Report No. 1 of theYork Community Council).

Comments:

The Cedarvale Traffic Management Plan was developed by a citizen task force, through an extensive public consultation process. The Traffic Plan consisted of numerous traffic calming measures aimed at reducing through traffic, reducing vehicular travel speeds, and improving pedestrian and cycling environments, to form a cohesive setting.

As a result the former City of York Council on June 25, 1997, approved the recommendations contained within the Cedarvale Community Traffic Plan within their jurisdictional control. Council further recommended the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto also approve those recommendations within their jurisdictional control, which was subsequently approved.

In late 1997, construction commenced on Phase I, which involved constructing twenty-one of the total forty traffic calming measures approved. For Council's information, it was the decision of both the citizen traffic committee and the local Councillor to choose and request those twenty-one locations, within the allocated Capital Budget.

Phase II involves completing the remaining nineteen individual traffic calming measures, subject to results of a survey undertaken on an individual street block basis revealing majority support.

The attached Appendix details the results of the residents survey for each individual street section and the preferred traffic calming measure, according to resident owners, non-resident owners and tenants. The survey results have been divided into three categories. It was concluded that traffic calming is supported if more than 50 percent of property owners responded and more than 50 percent of those responses were favourable (Table 1). It was concluded that residents were opposed to traffic calming if 50 percent. of the responses were not favourable whether a majority of property owners responded or not (Table 2). However, there were two street sections where less than 50 percent. of property owners responded, but of those responses, there was a significant majority that were favourable (Table 3). These were considered to be "marginally supported" and it is requested that York Community Council provide direction on whether the traffic calming measures should be installed at these locations.

Conclusions:

The survey results have been categorized as follows:

Supporting Traffic Calming

  1. Camberwell Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue;

2.Dewbourne Avenue between Westover Hill Road and Menin Road;

  1. Dewbourne Avenue and Peveril Hill North;

4.Strathearn Road between Ava Road and Westover Hill Road;

  1. Strathearn Road between Chiltern Hill Road and Bathurst Street.

Opposed to Traffic Calming

1.Avenal Drive between Peveril Hill South and Bathurst Street;

  1. Dewbourne Avenue between Flanders Road and Westover Hill Road;

3.Dewbourne Avenue between Camberwell Road and Rostrevor Road;

  1. Flanders Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue;

5.Glen Cedar Road between Markdale Avenue and Strathearn Road;

  1. Rostrevor Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue;

7.Strathearn Road between Westover Hill Road and Warwick Avenue;

  1. Strathearn Road between Markdale Avenue and Glen Cedar Road;

9.Strathearn Road and Glen Cedar Road;

  1. Westover Hill Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue.

Marginal Support for Traffic Calming

1.Chiltren Hill Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue;

  1. Glen Cedar Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue.

Based on the survey results, the preferred traffic calming measures should be installed on those individual streets where there was support for traffic calming. Also, York Community Council is requested to decide whether the traffic calming measures should be installed on those individual streets where the number of responses received was clearly not a majority, but these responses did indicate support for traffic calming.

Contact Person:

Jacqueline White

Manager, Traffic Operations, District 1

397-5021

392-8504 (fax)

Cedarvale Traffic Calming

Survey Results

Table 1: Supporting Traffic Calming

    Street Section % Responses Received % Support % No Support Preferred Option
1. Camberwell Road Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue 54 68 32 Combination Speed hump and Narrowing
2. Dewbourne Avenue Westover Hill Road and Menin Road 70 71 29 Speed hump
3. Dewbourne Avenue Peveril Hill North and Dewbourne Avenue 100 67 33 Raised Pedestrian Crossing
4. Strathearn Road Ava Road and Westover Hill Road 52 64 36 Speed hump
5. Strathearn Road Chiltren Hill Road and Bathurst Street 74 83 17 Combination Speed hump and Narrowing

Table 2: Opposed to Traffic Calming

    Street Section % Responses Received % Support % No Support Preferred Option
1. Avenal Drive Peveril Hill South and Bathurst Street 33 0 100 None
2. Dewbourne Avenue Flanders Road and Westover Hill Road 40 25 75 None
3. Dewbourne Avenue Camberwell Road and Rostrevor Road 36 20 80 None
4. Flanders Road Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue 33 42 58 None
5. Glen Cedar Road Markdale Avenue and Strathearn Road 83 29 71 None
6. Rostrevor Road Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue 56 64 36 None
7. Strathearn Road Westover Hill Road and Warwick Avenue 64 33 67 None
8. Strathearn Road Markdale Avenue and Glen Cedar Road 60 44 56 None
9. Strathearn Road Strathearn Road and Glen Cedar Road 60 45 55 None
10. Westover Hill Road Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue 26 78 22 Speed hump

Table 3: Marginal Support for Traffic Calming

    Street Section % Responses Received % Support % No Support Preferred Option
1. Chiltren Hill Road Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue 44 67 33 Combination Speed hump and Narrowing
2. Glen Cedar Road Eglinton Avenue West and Dewbourne Avenue 46 67 33 Combination Speed hump and Narrowing

The following persons appeared before the Community Council in connection with the foregoing matter:

-Jim Shankman, Toronto;

-Nathan Cheifetz, Toronto;

-Naomi Kestenbaum, Toronto;

-Howard Easkov, Toronto;

-Eleanor Osborne, Toronto;

-Edie Neuberger, Toronto; and

-Rick Orzy, Toronto.

SCHEDULE 'A' (page 1 of 3)

LOCATION OF SPEED HUMP ON STRATHEARN ROAD

SCHEDULE 'A' (page 2 of 3)

LOCATION OF SPEED HUMP ON DEWBOURNE AVENUE

SCHEDULE 'A' (page 3 or 3)

LOCATION OF SPEED HUMP AND CURB NARROWING

ON STRATHEARN ROAD

 

   
Please note that council and committee documents are provided electronically for information only and do not retain the exact structure of the original versions. For example, charts, images and tables may be difficult to read. As such, readers should verify information before acting on it. All council documents are available from the City Clerk's office. Please e-mail clerk@toronto.ca.

 

City maps | Get involved | Toronto links
© City of Toronto 1998-2005