STAFF REPORT
December 20, 1999
To: Works Committee
From: Barry H. Gutteridge, Commissioner, Works and Emergency Services
Subject: Summer Twice A Week Garbage Collection
Purpose:
To provide implementation plans and costs related to the three year phase-in of twice a week summer garbage collection
and to respond to the Works Committee request to report back on a process for surveying communities or neighbourhoods
to determine their interest in twice a week collection.
Financial Implications and Impact Statement:
The additional operating costs associated with implementing twice per week summer garbage collection are as follows:
2000 $ 900,000 (including $300,000 for existing twice a week summer collection)
2001 $ 900,000
2002 $1,450,000
Total: $3,250,000
The 2000 cost estimate includes $300,000 currently budgeted for summer twice a week garbage collection in a portion of
the Toronto Community plus $600,000 for summer twice a week garbage collection in the North York Community. The
total costs for twice a week summer collection across the City are estimated at $3.25 million.
The additional operating costs will be included in the Department's 2000 Operating Budget request.
Recommendations:
It is recommended, based on Council's direction to phase-in twice per week summer garbage collection across the City over
a three year period, that:
(1) twice a week summer curbside garbage collection operate from the last week of June to the last week of August (10
weeks) annually.
(2) for 2000, twice a week summer curbside garbage collection be provided in North York, as well as the west section of
Toronto which has been receiving this service.
(3) for 2001, twice a week summer curbside garbage collection be implemented in the remainder of the Toronto
Community.
(4) for 2002, twice a week summer curbside garbage collection be implemented in Etobicoke, East York, York and
Scarborough.
Background:
At its meeting on December 1, 1999, Works Committee received a report and heard a presentation by Northstar Research
Partners regarding the results of a public survey on the need for twice a week garbage collection in the City of Toronto.
The Works Committee:
(1) received the aforementioned report;
(2) requested that a copy of the report and presentation be forwarded to all Members of Council; and
(3) requested the Commissioner of Works and Emergency Services to report back to the Committee with a process for
surveying communities or neighbourhoods interested in twice-a-week collection, for consideration by the Committee.
The report also indicated that staff would be reporting back in January on an implementation plan for summer twice a week
collection.
Discussion:
Staff have reviewed the concept of surveying on a neighbourhood basis to determine the need for twice per week garbage
collection, and are of the opinion that it is not a viable undertaking. The Northstar survey has already provided clear
feedback at the community level, and conducting a similar survey at the neighbourhood level would be cost prohibitive.
Furthermore, even if such a survey was undertaken, attempting to implement twice per week summer garbage collection on
a neighbourhood by neighbourhood basis would pose significant logistical problems from an operational perspective. This
approach would also create confusion, and likely some complaints, in adjacent neighbourhoods that do not receive the
additional service. For these reasons, it is recommended that if Council wants twice per week summer garbage collection it
should be provided across the City to all single family households.
Based on Council's previous decision to phase-in twice per week summer garbage collection over a three year period, we
would recommend the following implementation schedule:
2000 - North York Community and part of Toronto Community
2001 - remainder of the Toronto Community
2002 - Etobicoke, Scarborough, East York and York Communities
The rationale for this implementation schedule is as follows:
(1) It is staff's understanding, based on the discussions of the Budget Committee in April 1999, that twice a week summer
collection was to be implemented in North York in 2000.
(2) According to the Northstar survey, North York residents, followed by Toronto residents, have the highest level of
support for this service.
(3) Curbside garbage collection service is provided by City crews in North York and Toronto, which allows for some
flexibility in adjusting service levels. York and Etobicoke collection service is contracted out, with the contracts expiring
on June 30, 2001 and July 10, 2002 respectively. Implementation in Etobicoke may have to be delayed until after July 10,
2002 to correspond with the start of the new contract.
The estimated annual operating costs for introducing twice per week summer garbage collection for ten weeks (from the
last week of June to the last week of August ) are as follows:
North York $ 600,000
Toronto $1,200,000 (including $300,000 for existing twice a week collection)
Scarborough $ 600,000
Etobicoke $ 500,000
York $ 200,000
East York $ 150,000
$3,250,000
In the communities where collection is provided by City staff, the cost estimates were determined by calculating the cost of
hiring additional casual workers during the summer months, increased operating expenses, production and distribution of a
supplementary collection calendar and keeping additional trucks in the fleet to accommodate the truck requirements during
the 10 week summer period. The cost of keeping the trucks results in a higher weekly cost for summer twice per week
collection as compared to providing this service on a year round basis.
For example, the annual cost savings associated with reducing garbage collection in North York from twice to once per
week year round were projected to be $1.2 million, based on taking 14 collection trucks off the road. The estimated cost for
summer twice per week collection is one half that amount at $600,000, even through service is only being provided for 10
weeks of the year. The cost for summer twice per week collection in North York has been reduced from the original
estimate of $800,000 due to our plans to now retain old packer trucks that were going to be retired from the fleet for the
second collection day. This approach results in additional spare trucks and higher maintenance costs, but is less expensive
than using trucks that have not been fully amortized. Although using old packers is cost effective for the North York
community, we would not have sufficient old packers to use this approach across the City.
In the communities where collection is provided by private contractors, we will include a provision for summer twice a
week collection in the tender documents.
Aside from the cost impacts, the other concerns about twice per week collection relate to the impact on garbage generation,
recycling activity and greenhouse gas emissions. Experience in Toronto and other cities has shown that reducing garbage
collection to once per week reduces garbage generation and increases recycling levels. Going back to twice per week
collection may result in increased garbage generation and reduced recycling levels. Twice a week collection also increases
the greenhouse gas emissions from our vehicle fleet during the summer months.
To address these concerns, staff examined the possibility of converting the second collection day to an organics collection
day. One option is to convert the once every second week yard waste collection during the summer to a weekly food and
yard waste collection. The cost of implementing this option in the North York Community, assuming that each house is
provided with 30 translucent plastic kitchen organics bags and collected material is transferred to a remote composting site,
is estimated to be $850,000.00. The drawback to this option is that considerable promotional effort would be required to
encourage residents to set out food waste separately, and then after ten weeks, a second promotional campaign would be
required to tell residents to revert back to their previous set out practices. A smaller scale pilot project testing different
containers and collection methods for organic material is the preferred approach. This is discussed in a separate report on
the supplementary agenda for the January 12, 2000 Works Committee meeting.
Conclusions:
In view of Council's decision to implement twice per week summer curbside garbage collection, it is recommended that
implementation commence in North York in 2000. Surveying individual neighbourhoods regarding their desire for twice
per week summer garbage collection is not recommended.
Contact:
Andrew Pollock
Director, Policy and Planning
Solid Waste Management Services
Works and Emergency Services
Phone: 392-4715
Fax: 392-4754
E-mail: apolloc@toronto.ca
Angelos Bacopoulos
General Manager
Solid Waste Management Services
Barry H. Gutteridge
Commissioner, Works and Emergency Services
CAP:RS
(C:\in\it016)