Implementation of the Tenant Defence Fund
and Rental Housing Office
The Community Services Committee recommends:
(a) the adoption of the report dated December 20, 1999, from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood
Services, subject to amending the Recommendations to read as follows:
AIt is recommended that:
(1) City Council approve the structure for the Tenant Defence Fund Program, within the total approved budget of
$300,000.00, as outlined in Appendix A, and including:
(a) purchase of outreach and co-ordinating services at a cost of up to $150,000.00; and
(b) grants to tenants groups disputing applications for above-guideline rent increases using the remaining budget;
(2) City Council approve a Tenant Support Grants Program, as set out in Appendix C, and delegate the
administration of Tenant Support Grants to the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services, and
that the Commissioner report thereon to the Tenant Defence Sub-Committee;
(3) the Tenant Support Grants be deemed to be in the interest of the municipality;
(4) City Council authorize the introduction of any necessary bills to give effect thereto;
(5) the Sub-Committee to Restore Rent Control be renamed as the A Tenant Defence Sub-Committee@ and be
comprised of eight Councillors who are currently members of the Sub-Committee to Restore Rent Control; and
further that its mandate be revised to provide direction to the Tenant Defence Fund initiative;
(6) the Chair of the Sub-Committee to Restore Rent Control canvass existing members of the Sub-Committee, and
report back on revised terms of reference and membership of the new Tenant Defence Sub-Committee; and
(7) the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto@;
(b) that the Guidelines for Tenant Support Grants, as outlined in Appendix C, be amended, as follows:
(i) appropriate changes be made with respect to the eligibility of tenant groups for grants under the Tenant
Support Grants Program, specifically, that part (A)(3)(e) and part (B)(3)(e) be amended by inserting the words Aan
amount equal to 15 percent above the@ prior to the words Aaverage rents for the City of Toronto@;
(ii) appropriate changes be made so that references in the report related to average rents include townhouses in
addition to apartment units; and
(iii) appropriate changes be made with respect to AEligible Expenditures@ under the Additional Grant Program,
specifically, that part (B)(2) be amended by including lawyers among the Aeligible professional services@
permitted under the grant program.
The Community Services Committee reports, for the information of Council, having referred the following
recommendation contained in the communication dated January 12, 2000, from Councillor Michael Walker, Chair,
Sub-Committee to Restore Rent Control, to the City Solicitor with a request that he report directly to City Council for its
meeting on February 1, 2000, on revised wording following consultation with Councillor Walker:
"making appropriate changes to the report to reflect that the Tenant Defence Sub-Committee will only hear deputations
from applicants whose applications have been refused and wish to appeal the decision."
The Community Services Committee submits the following report (December 20, 1999) from the Commissioner of
Community and Neighbourhood Services:
Purpose:
To set out guidelines for funding under the Tenant Defence Fund and to update Council on establishment of a Rental
Housing Office.
Financial Implications:
Funding for the Tenant Defence Fund initiative was approved at the November 23-25, 1999, Council meeting for a total
budget of $300,000.00.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that:
(1) Council approve the structure for the Tenant Defence Fund Program, within the total approved budget of $300,000.00,
as outlined in Appendix A and including:
(a) purchase of outreach and coordinating services at a cost of up to $150,000.00; and
(b) grants to tenants groups' disputing applications for above-guideline rent increases using the remaining budget;
(2) Council approve a Tenant Support Grants Program as set out in Appendix C and delegate the administration of Tenant
Support Grants to the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services;
(3) the Tenant Support Grants be deemed to be in the interest of the municipality;
(4) Council authorize the introduction of any necessary bills to give effect hereto;
(5) the Sub-Committee to Restore Rent Control be renamed as the "Tenant Support Sub-Committee" and its mandate be
revised to provide direction to the Tenant Defence Fund initiative;
(6) the Chair of the Sub-Committee to Restore Rent Control canvass existing members of the Sub-Committee, and report
back on a revised terms of reference and membership of the new Tenant Support Sub-Committee; and
(7) the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.
Background:
On November 23-25, 1999, City Council took a number of actions to support tenants, including:
- establishing a Tenant Defence Fund of $300,000.00 to help tenants dispute applications for "above-guideline rent
increases" (AGI's) at the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal;
- expanding the Tenant Hotline Service funded by the City as of July 1, 2000; and
- setting up a Rental Housing Office to co-ordinate and develop information and advisory services for tenants.
This report responds to a request made by the Community Services Committee on November 4, 1999, that staff prepare a
report on a process for issuing grants through the Tenant Defence Fund.
This report also addresses the following requests made by Council on November 23, 24 and 25, 1999:
- that staff report on options for a six-month temporary expansion of the existing eviction hotline provided by the
Federation of Metro Tenants' Associations; and
- that staff report on the feasibility of establishing a Rental Housing Office in each of the four districts.
Comments:
Design of the Tenant Defence Fund:
Over the past few weeks, staff have consulted various parties, including those who developed the original Tenant Defence
Fund proposal and a recently revised model, representatives of Legal Aid, the Federation of Metro Tenants' Associations,
agents who have represented tenants at the Tribunal, Housing Help Centres and Tribunal staff. These discussions have
focused on minor differences between the model proposed by staff and the revised model put forward by the
Sub-Committee to Restore Rent Control in November of 1999.
Based on these discussions, we have concluded that the following objectives should help guide the design of the Tenant
Defence Fund Program:
(a) Provide a range of services to assist tenants disputing AGI's - There is consensus on the key functions of the program,
which include: outreach/organizing of tenants; pre-hearing support/representation at the Tribunal; and provision of
professional expertise (e.g., expert witnesses at hearings).
(b) Minimize potential liability to the City - Legal staff have advised against having City staff, or agencies contracted by
the City, provide "advice" to tenants or represent tenants at the Tribunal. To limit potential liability the City can use its
granting powers to ensure tenants have effective advice and representation and use a purchase of service arrangement for
other non-advisory support (e.g. outreach, information and organizing services).
(c) Grants to tenants' groups should be timely and effective - There is consensus that grants should be relatively modest
(i.e., a basic grant of up to $1,000.00 to help cover the costs of representation; grants of up to $5,000.00 for
professional/engineering expertise) and the criteria straightforward, so that a larger number of tenants' groups can benefit
from the limited funds available and City funding will not replace other funding sources (e.g., Legal Aid, or fundraising).
Legal staff have advised that the administration of a grant program approved by Council can be delegated to staff if the
discretionary policy decisions regarding the amounts of the grants and the eligibility requirements for such grants are
approved by Council.
Proposed Model:
Taking these factors into account, we propose the model shown in Appendix A. The model outlines the functions of the
Tenant Defence Fund as well as the new Rental Housing Office. The Tenant Defence Fund will provide direct and indirect
support to tenants facing above-guideline rent increase applications. The Rental Housing Office will provide support to the
tenant sector as a whole on broader issues and also be a resource to Councillors in dealing with tenant/landlord issues.
The following components are included in the model:
(1) Outreach/Co-ordinating Team - An outreach/co-ordinating team is now being selected via a proposal call process. In
the interest of time, an RFP has already been issued for the purchase of these services, and will close in late January 2000.
Appendix B provides a detailed listing of the services to be provided by the successful proponent. Once Council has
confirmed the overall structure of the program on February 1-3, 2000, a contract will be signed with the selected
proponent.
(2) Tenant Support Grants - Appendix C provides detailed criteria for the grant program. We have taken into account the
advice of Legal staff that only the administration of grants can be delegated to staff and that such a delegation requires the
approval by Council of the grants program including clear, concise eligibility criteria so that staff are merely administering
the program by processing applications.
(3) Rental Housing Office - At the November 1999 meeting, Council requested that new Rental Housing Office be up and
running as of January 2000. The Rental Housing Office is being initially established with a staff person, a phone
line/referral service, and a web page on the City's internet site. As Council has requested, a Rental Housing Advisory
Committee is also being established, consisting of representatives of tenant organizations, Legal Aid, housing help centres,
various City departments and Councillors' offices, and it will meet for the first time in January.
We propose that a committee of four councillors be established to advise Council and staff on management of the Tenant
Defence Fund Initiative. The committee would receive regular updates from the Outreach/Co-ordinating Team and staff on
program activities, and help evaluate success of the initiative after six months and one year. We suggest that the mandate of
the existing Sub-Committee to Restore Rent Control be revised to serve this purpose.
Staff were also asked to report on the feasibility of establishing a Rental Housing Office in each of the four districts of the
City. As the Shelter, Housing and Support Division has no regional structure, there is no framework in place to provide
direct service in each of the districts. However, the Division's approach with all programs is to work with existing
community-based agencies to deliver services wherever feasible. Thus the capacity of local agencies to provide service is
enhanced, and services can often be provided at lower cost. We would propose that, as the functions of the Rental Housing
Office are developed in the coming months, the Rental Housing Advisory Committee be consulted on the best way to
provide such services at the local level. We would recommend against creating a district structure for the Rental Housing
Office at this early stage, given the significant expense involved and the fact that the functions of the Office have not yet
been clearly defined.
Temporary Expansion of the Eviction Hotline:
On November 23-25, 1999, staff were asked to suggest options for expanding the evictions hotline (operated by the
Federation of Metro Tenants' Associations) on a temporary basis for six months, pending the results of the RFP for the new
hotline service.
Two reviews of tenant information and advisory services were carried out in 1999. The first created an inventory of the
community services available to tenants and identified gaps to be filled by the City and others. These include suggested
improvements to Legal Aid services, extension of an early intervention eviction prevention program, better information
materials, and expansion of the Tenant Hotline service. A second review looked specifically at the Tenant Hotline service
provided by the Federation of Metro Tenants' Associations (FMTA) and the organizational capacity of the FMTA to
deliver it. While this review concluded that the Hotline should receive more funding (to meet the standards set by the City),
the City Auditor has recommended that a Request for Proposals for this service be issued to the community. The new
service will not commence until July 1, 2000, in order to give the FMTA time to address its governance issues and to
participate in the RFP. In the interim, Council has approved an extension of the FMTA service contract for the Tenant
Hotline to June 30, 2000, at the current level of funding.
In addition to the Tenant Hotline, the FMTA operates an eviction hotline which is not specifically included in the service
agreement with the City. The service review suggested that the FMTA should hire more staff and make improvements to
its phone system so that both lines could be combined and the service be made more accessible and efficient. The RFP
process will be designed to accomplish these objectives, but through a process which allows other community agencies to
bid on the service. Consequently, we would advise against providing expanded funding to the FMTA for hotline services in
the interim period prior to July 1, 2000, as it would compromise the RFP process.
Conclusion:
This report has proposed guidelines for management of the new Tenant Defence Fund. This initiative will provide outreach
and co-ordinating support, as well as financial assistance to tenants groups that are disputing above-guideline rent increase
applications at the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal. Staff have also taken steps to establish a Rental Housing Office and a
Rental Housing Advisory Committee to provide support to the tenant sector as a whole.
Contact Name:
Derek Ballantyne
Acting General Manager, Shelter Housing and Support
Tel: 392-7885/Fax: 392-0548
_________
Appendix A
Proposed Model
Tenant Defence Fund: To support tenants who are disputing above guideline rent increase applications
Tenant Support Committee
outreach $ for representation
organizing $ for experts
support
Tenants' Groups
support agencies
who support tenant
Appendix B
Services Of Outreach/Co-ordinating Team
The goal of this component is to ensure tenants have the means and information they need to get organized, obtain
necessary legal and/or technical assistance and participate effectively in the dispute process before the Ontario Rental
Housing Tribunal. The community organization to be selected will act as an "Outreach/Co-ordinating Team" and develop
and implement a program to provide the following essential services and assistance to tenants (these have been included in
the RFP already issued to the community):
(a) Undertake Tenant Outreach and Education Activities, which include:
- Contact tenants in all buildings where landlords have applied for above-guideline rent increases ("Applications").
- Develop and gather information materials pertaining to the Tribunal's dispute resolution process and the Tribunal's
procedures (e.g., a step-to-step guide) for distribution to tenants/tenant groups.
- Develop and deliver workshops for tenant groups about the dispute resolution process and procedures, and how to
organize (e.g., basic information about notices of meetings, setting up a bank account) in conjunction with legal clinics,
housing help centres and tenant service organizations.
(b) Review Pending Applications before the Tribunal, including:
- Request and obtain Tribunal data about Applications which have not been scheduled or have not yet been heard by the
Tribunal.
- Identify Applications which could be precedent-setting (e.g., relating to municipal interest in preserving affordable rental
housing stock) and "test cases", and bring such Applications to the attention of the City and the Housing Specialty Clinic to
be established by Legal Aid Ontario and provide rationale for selecting the precedent-setting or test cases.
- Monitor and analyze with City staff the outcome of the Applications to evaluate the effectiveness of proposed strategies
and to assess trends of Tribunal decisions.
(c) Provide Assistance for Tenants Organizing to Dispute Applications, including:
- Facilitate tenants' meetings regarding Applications and related issues such as organizing and fundraising.
- Assist tenants in obtaining meeting/office space.
- Arrange to obtain, and cover costs of photocopying Tribunal's file regarding the Application where necessary.
- Provide general information about how to review landlords' application files and how to prepare a response to the
landlord's Application.
- Inform tenant groups of options for representation, e.g., self-representation or retaining a lawyer or other agent. (Note:
The Team shall not represent tenants at the Tribunal or recommend particular lawyers or agents.)
- Encourage, wherever possible, communication and negotiation between tenants and landlords.
- Co-ordinate with community agencies and refer tenants to their services.
- Assist tenant groups in applying for and securing Legal Aid where possible.
- Provide information about the City's Tenant Support Grants. Details of the Program will be considered by City Council in
January 2000.
- Determine whether an Application is so technically complex that professional technical expertise would be helpful. If so,
inform the tenants' group and advise the City that the tenants' group may be a suitable candidate for an Additional Grant
under the Tenant Support Grants Program.
(d) Produce Reports on:
- Detailed program activities.
- Analysis and evaluation of results of the Applications involved in this program in relation to the activities and strategies
undertaken.
- Recommendations for improvements to the Tenant Defence Fund Program and strategies, including all forms of
assistance to tenant groups dealing with Applications.
(e) Provide advice to City staff with respect to eligibility of specific tenant groups for assistance under the Tenant Support
Grants Program.
_________
Appendix C
Guidelines for Tenant Support Grants
Objective: To provide financial assistance in the form of grants to tenant groups who wish to dispute their landlords'
application for an above-guideline rent increase under the Tenant Protection Act.
Total Budget: $150,000.00.
Tenant Support Grant Program:
The Tenant Support Grant Program consists of the following two grants programs:
(A) Basic Grant Program: $75,000.00 (maximum $1,000.00 per grant).
(1) (a) Upon receipt of a Basic Grant Application from a tenant group in accordance with paragraph 4, the Commissioner
of Community and Neighbourhood Services (the "Commissioner") will assess eligibility for Basic Grants in accordance
with this Basic Grant Program.
(b) Basic Grant will be committed by the Commissioner to Eligible Groups on a first-come, first-served basis. When Basic
Grants in the total amount of $75,000.00 have been committed by the Commissioner, no further tenant groups will be
eligible to receive Basic Grants under the Basic Grant Program.
(c) Each eligible tenant group (the "Eligible Group") will be eligible for a Basic Grant in the amount of their Eligible
Expenditures, up to the maximum amounts for each Eligible Expenditure set out in paragraph (2), and up to a total
maximum amount of $1,000.00.
(d) Upon receipt by the Commissioner of the Basic Grant Report in accordance with paragraph (5) from an Eligible Group
to whom a Basic Grant has been committed, the Commissioner shall pay to the Eligible Group a Basic Grant in the lesser
amount of :
- the Basic Grant commitment approved by the Commissioner under paragraph (1)(b); and
- the amount of Eligible Expenditures for which invoices are provided in accordance with paragraph (5).
(2) Eligible Expenditures: The following expenditures are Eligible Expenditures, and the following corresponding amounts
are the maximum amounts that any Eligible Group will be allocated with respect to that Eligible Expenditure:
Eligible Expenditure Maximum Amount
Cost of hiring a qualified agent and/or lawyer $1,000.00
to represent the Eligible Group at the Tribunal
Cost of renting meeting and/or office space $100.00
Printing and production costs, cost of postage, $500.00 (combined total)
cost of translation and interpretation services
Cost of photocopying the Tribunal's file $200.00
regarding the landlord's Application
(3) Eligible Groups: A tenant group is eligible for a Basic Grant in the amount set out in paragraph (1), if it meets the
following criteria:
(a) the landlord has filed an application for an above-guideline rent increase (the "Application");
(b) the Application does not relate to rent-geared-to-income units;
(c) only one tenant group will be eligible for each residential building for which the landlord has filed an Application, and
only the first such group from that building to apply for a grant will be eligible;
(d) the tenant group has the support of the following number of tenants in disputing the Application:
- if less than 100 units are affected by the Landlord's Application - 50 percent of the tenants residing in the affected units at
the time the Basic Grant Application is made; and
- if 100 or more units are affected by the Landlord's Application - 33 percent of the tenants residing in the affected units at
the time the Basic Grant Application is made;
(e) the following number of units in the building have a current rent at or below average rents for the City of Toronto based
on the 1999 CMHC Rental Market Survey (i.e., $626.00 for a bachelor, $772.00 for a one-bedroom, $924.00 for a
two-bedroom, and $1,099.00 for a three-bedroom unit):
- if less than 100 units are affected by the landlord's Application - 50 percent of the affected units; and
- if 100 or more units are affected by the landlord's Application - 33 percent of the affected units; and
(f) the tenant group has submitted to the Commissioner a Basic Grant Application in accordance with paragraph (4), and a
Basic Grant Report in accordance with paragraph (5).
(4) Basic Grant Application: Each Eligible Group must submit a Basic Grant Application in a form satisfactory to the
Commissioner, and such Basic Grant Application must be accompanied by the following documentation:
(a) a petition in favour of disputing the Application signed by the following number of tenants, stating the name of each
signing tenant and an acknowledgement by each signing tenant that the rent he or she currently pays to the landlord is at or
below the amount set out in paragraph (3)(e) above:
- if less than 100 units are affected by the landlord's Application - 50 percent of the tenants residing in the affected units at
the time the Basic Grant Application is made; and
- if 100 or more units are affected by the landlord's Application - 33 percent of the tenants residing in the affected units at
the time the Basic Grant Application is made;
(b) copies of the Notices of Rent Increase or Notices of Hearing relating to the Application served by the landlord on each
of the tenants who have signed the petition in paragraph 4(a) above;
(c) a synopsis of the tenant group's reasons for disputing the Application; and
(d) an estimate of the amount of Eligible Expenditures that the Eligible Group expects to incur.
(5) Basic Grant Report: Within three months of the disposition, other than appeals, of the Application, each Eligible Group
to whom a Basic Grant has been allocated, must submit to the Commissioner a Basic Grant Report in a form satisfactory to
the Commissioner, and such Basic Grant Report must be accompanied by the following:
(a) an order of the Tribunal, in which the Eligible Group is not noted in default; and
(b) invoices for each of the Eligible Expenditures incurred by the Eligible Group.
(B) Additional Grant Program: $75,000.00 (maximum $5,000.00 per grant).
(1) (a) Upon receipt of an Additional Grant Application from a tenant group in accordance with paragraph (4), the
Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services (the "Commissioner") will assess eligibility for Additional
Grants in accordance with this Additional Grant Program.
(b) Additional Grants will be committed by the Commissioner to Eligible Groups on a first-come, first-served basis. When
Additional Grants in the total amount of $75,000.00 have been committed by the Commissioner, no further tenant groups
will be eligible to receive Additional Grants under the Additional Grant Program.
(c) Each Eligible Group will be eligible for an Additional Grant in the amount of their Eligible Expenditures up to a total
maximum amount of $5,000.00.
(d) Upon receipt by the Commissioner of the Additional Grant Report in accordance with paragraph (5) from an Eligible
Group to whom an Additional Grant has been committed, the Commissioner shall pay to the Eligible Group an Additional
Grant in the lesser amount of :
- the Additional Grant commitment approved by the Commissioner under paragraph (1)(b); and
- the amount of Eligible Expenditures for which invoices are provided in accordance with paragraph (5).
(2) Eligible Expenditures: Eligible Expenditures are the cost of Eligible Professional Services to assist with disputing an
Application.
Eligible Professional Services are the services of a professional engineer, architect or forensic accountant who is registered
with the regulating professional body of his/her profession (the "Eligible Professional").
(3) Eligible Groups: A tenant group is eligible for an Additional Grant in the amount set out in paragraph (1), if it meets the
following criteria:
(a) the landlord has filed an Application;
(b) the Application does not relate to rent-geared-to-income units;
(c) only one tenant group will be eligible for each residential building for which the landlord has filed an Application, and
only the first such group from that building to apply for a grant will be eligible;
(d) the tenant group has the support of the following number of tenants in disputing the Application:
- if less than 100 units are affected by the landlord's Application - 50 percent of the tenants residing in the affected units at
the time the Basic Grant Application is made; and
- if 100 or more units are affected by the landlord's Application - 33 percent of the tenants residing in the affected units at
the time the Basic Grant Application is made;
(e) the following number of units in the building have a current rent at or below average rents based on the 1999 CMHC
Rental Market Survey (i.e., $626.00 for a bachelor, $772.00 for a one-bedroom, $924.00 for a two-bedroom, and $1,099.00
for a three-bedroom unit):
- if less than 100 units are affected by the landlord's Application - 50 percent of the affected units; and
- if 100 or more units are affected by the landlord's Application - 33 percent of the affected units;
(f) the tenant group requires Eligible Professional Services; and
(g) the tenant group has submitted to the Commissioner an Additional Grant Application in accordance with paragraph (4),
and an Additional Grant Report in accordance with paragraph (5).
(4) Additional Grant Application: Each Eligible Group must submit an Additional Grant Application in a form satisfactory
to the Commissioner, and such Additional Grant Application must be accompanied by the following documentation:
(a) a petition in favour of disputing the Application signed by the following number of tenants, stating the name of each
signing tenant and an acknowledgement by each signing tenant that the rent he or she currently pays to the landlord is at or
below the amounts set out in paragraph (3)(e) above:
- if less than 100 units are affected by the landlord's Application - 50 percent of the tenants residing in the affected units at
the time the Basic Grant Application is made; and
- if 100 or more units are affected by the landlord's Application - 33 percent of the tenants residing in the affected units at
the time the Basic Grant Application is made;
(b) copies of the Notices of Rent Increase or Notices of Hearing relating to the Application served by the landlord on each
of the tenants who have signed the petition in paragraph (4)(a) above;
(c) the Eligible Services required by the tenant group and the tenant group's reasons for requiring such Eligible Services;
(d) a statement from the Outreach/Co-ordinating Team, in a form acceptable to the Commissioner, that it is the
Outreach/Co-ordinating Team's opinion that the Eligible Group would benefit from Eligible Professional Services and the
nature of the Eligible Professional Services from which it would benefit;
(e) a quote from an Eligible Professional outlining the Eligible Professional Services to be provided to the Eligible Group
and the estimated cost of such services; and
(f) the professional qualifications of the Eligible Professional and proof of his or her
membership in the regulating professional body of his/her profession.
(5) Additional Grant Report: Within three months of the disposition, other than appeals, of the Application, each Eligible
Group to whom an Additional Grant has been allocated, must submit to the Commissioner an Additional Grant Report in a
form satisfactory to the Commissioner, and such Additional Grant Report must be accompanied by the following:
(a) an order of the Tribunal, in which the Eligible Group is not noted in default; and
(b) invoices for each of the Eligible Expenditures incurred by the Eligible Group.
The Community Services Committee also submits the following communication (January 12, 2000) from Councillor
Michael Walker, Chair of the Sub-Committee to Restore Rent Control:
Purpose:
To request that the Community Services Committee endorse the recommendations made by the Sub-Committee to Restore
Rent Control with respect to Item No. 8 on the Community Services Committee agenda.
Recommendations:
(1) That Recommendation No. (5) of the report be amended by striking out the words "Tenant Support Sub-Committee"
and replacing them with "Tenant Defence Sub-Committee".
(2) That recommendation No. (2) be amended by:
(a) striking out the words "Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services" and replacing them with "Tenant
Defence Sub-Committee"; and
(c) making appropriate changes to the report to reflect that the Tenant Defence Sub-Committee will only hear deputations
from applicants whose applications have been refused and wish to appeal the decision.
(3) That Recommendation No. (2) be further amended by:
(a) making appropriate changes to the proposed model of the Tenant Defence Fund as outlined in Appendix A and the
Guidelines for Tenant Support Grants as outlined in Appendix C of the report, to reflect that the new Tenant Defence
Sub-Committee has final approval over applications for grants under the Basic Grant Program and the Additional Grant
Program; and
(b) making appropriate changes to the Guidelines for Tenant Support Grants, as outlined in Appendix C of the report, with
respect to eligibility of tenant groups for grants under the Tenant Support Grant Program. Specifically, that Part (A)(3) (e)
on page 9 and Part (B)(3) (e) on page 11 of the report be amended by striking out the words "average rents for the City of
Toronto" and replacing them with "an amount equal to 15 percent above the average rents for the City of Toronto"; and
(c) making appropriate changes to the Guidelines for Tenant Support Grants, as outlined in Appendix C, so that references
in the report related to average rents include townhouses in addition to apartment units; and
(d) making appropriate changes to the Guidelines for Tenant Support Grants, as outlined in Appendix C of the report, with
respect to "Eligible Expenditures" under the Additional Grant Program. Specifically, that Part (B)(2) on page 11 of the
report be amended by including lawyers among the "eligible professional services" permitted under the Grant Program.
(4) That the new Tenant Defence Sub-Committee be made up of eight Councillors who currently are members of the
Sub-Committee to Restore Rent Control.
Background:
At its meeting of January 12, 2000, the Sub-Committee to Restore Rent Control had before it the December 20, 1999,
report from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services respecting the implementation of the Tenant
Defence Fund and Rental Housing Office.
As the meeting did not have quorum (only seven members were present) the Sub-Committee met informally. Members
present at the meeting unanimously endorsed the above recommendations and requested that the Chair bring them forward
at the next meeting of the Standing Committee.
_________
Mr. Bob Gosschalk, President, Federation of North York Tenants Associations Inc., appeared before the Community
Services Committee in connection with the foregoing matter.
|