The PATH network is an integral part of the City of Toronto’s downtown core. The Northwest PATH (NW PATH) aims to extend the network to better service projected future growth. The project has been evaluated through the development of a Class C Environmental Assessment (EA) Addendum that has focused on the following:
The Notice of Completion has been filed for the Environmental Assessment Addendum and is currently under a 30 day public review.
With Council approval, following a 30 day public review, the Class EA Addendum will be submitted to the Ministry of Environment, Conservation and Parks (MOECP) before moving to final design and construction procurement. Construction is forecasted to start in 2021.
As part of the EA Addendum, the City has completed a comparative evaluation of four alternative NW PATH alignments that are illustrated in Figure 4 and described below.
Four alternative NW PATH alignments were considered:
As part of the EA Addendum process, the City of Toronto’s dynamic microsimulation pedestrian model of Union Station (see Figure 5), the PATH system, and the local street network was updated and expanded to include the four alternative NW PATH alignments.
The pedestrian model provides an understanding of pedestrian movements in the area and tests the alignments from a capacity and user amenity perspective. The model provides information considered in the evaluation of alternative alignments including passenger use and flow capacity for each alignment, congestion for passengers using each route, and journey cost. Network-level analysis has also been undertaken to determine the number of jobs that can be accessed using the PATH system (see Figure 6). All four options provide pedestrian amenity benefits and help to reduce projected pedestrian congestion at key surface intersections north of Union Station.
The following summarizes the pedestrian analysis:
Consultation is integral to the environmental assessment process and to the evaluation of the alignment options. Input from the public is key in identifying a recommended preferred alignment.
To date, the NW PATH consultation has included:
The Online Feedback Survey is now closed. All input received during consultation will be considered and included along with the technical work in the EA Addendum.
City staff have completed an Environmental Assessment Addendum with the objective of updating the original 2008 study to validate whether the original study findings (a tunnel underneath York Street) is still the optimal solution for completing the project.
Following consultation with the indigenous community, local landowners, community groups, Toronto Transit Commission, and Toronto Parking Authority, as well as City Divisions and the public, the Addendum finds that an alternative route that connects the existing Phase 1 North West PATH tunnel to 55 University Avenue underneath University Avenue will result in:
View the reports:
To provide comments, ask questions or to access to the full report and Appendicies, please contact:
Matt Klowak | Project Manager, Civic Projects
Matt.Klowak@toronto.ca
416.338.2347
Consultation Dates: Nov 1 to Nov 30, 2018
If concerns arise regarding the Class EA Addendum that cannot be resolved through discussions with the City of Toronto, a person/party may request that the Minister of the Environment, Conservation and Parks make an order for the project to comply with Part II of the Environmental Assessment Act. As of July 1, 2018, a Part II Order Request Form must be used to request a Part II Order. The Part II Order Request Form is available on the Forms Repository website by searching “Part II Order” or “012-2206E” (the form ID number). The request must be received by the Minister by December 14, 2018, with copies sent to the Director, the Clerk and the Project Manager at the addresses indicated below. If there are no Part II Order requests received by this date, the City of Toronto may proceed with design and construction of the project.
The NW PATH EA Addendum maintains as much consistency as possible with the original 2008 EA in terms of the evaluation criteria used to compare alignments, while also updating technical assumptions, considerations, and costing, to reflect the changing local context in the last 10 years. The criteria used to assess the alignments both quantitatively (i.e., engineering investigation, pedestrian modelling, and costing) and qualitatively (i.e. policy fit) evaluates the alignments through an evaluation matrix.
Table 1 lists the advantages and disadvantages of each alternative alignment. For more detailed information on the evaluation of each alternative, please review the evaluation matrix.
Table 1. Advantages and disadvantages of each of the four alternative alignments.
Advantages | Disadvantages | |
---|---|---|
Alignment #1/York Street |
|
|
Alignment #2/Front Street |
|
|
Alignment #3/Building Alignment |
|
|
Alignment #4/University (Parking Lot) |
|
|
Alignment #4 along University Avenue is the recommended alternative (see Figure 4 below). This route provides a direct link from Union station to 55 University Avenue (Sun Life Building), that is the most effective in servicing the north-west core while relieving pedestrian congestion concerns and accommodating the projected peak hour pedestrian volumes well into 2031.
Minimizing the disruption to those who use the PATH, travel the surface routes, live, and work in the area is important to the City. Where possible, construction will occur in existing underground structures or under decking to reduce surface disruption and all construction will be coordinated with any other major downtown infrastructure work that is planned.
Through an online survey, which is now closed, the City asked for public input on the evaluation, recommended alignment, and any potential concerns you have regarding construction.