The City is undertaking a study to help determine improvements at Silverview Park. The outcomes of the study will help determine the project scope, budget and next steps. Community input collected will inform the development of the design for the park improvements.
The timeline is subject to change.
Sign up for updates related to the Silverview Park Improvements or unsubscribe from the mailing list.
This project has been classified as an Involve project based on the International Association of Public Participation Spectrum. This means we work directly with the public, stakeholders and rightsholders throughout the design process to ensure that ideas and aspirations are understood and considered in the design process.
In this phase, the project team gathered community feedback to develop a vision, guiding principles and key features and amenities for the park improvements.
The new park will be a safe, inclusive, family-friendly green space for the community to gather. The park will contribute to supporting a healthy and active lifestyle for all ages and abilities.
From October 2 to October 30, an online survey collected feedback from over 143 community members on the proposed features and amenities for the park improvements. The survey was available in English, Korean, Farsi and Chinese (simplified and traditional).
When asked what respondents liked about the current park:
Ten per cent did not like any of the above. Twelve per cent provided other comments, with the most common being that the park is quiet and peaceful.
When asked what respondents disliked about the current park:
Seventy-nine per cent of respondents liked the draft vision statement and guiding principles proposed in the survey.
Over 85 per cent of respondents felt that each of the proposed guiding principles reflected what is most important.
Over 75 per cent of respondents felt the following features are priorities for the park:
Other suggestions included water fountains/bottle filling stations, an off-leash area and recreation/fitness features. Some suggested replacing the baseball diamond with sports courts (suggestions included basketball, tennis, ping pong, handball, volleyball and an outdoor track).
Respondents were divided on the theme of the new playground with 34 per cent preferring natural, 27 per cent geometric, 22 per cent traditional and 17 per cent having no preference.
The most popular play features were climbing structures, play structures suitable for both younger and older children, a spiral slide and various types of swings.
On September 16, the local Councillor hosted an event at the park with approximately 60 community members where the project team collected ideas for the improved park design. Community members provided feedback on six themes that emerged from the thought exchange activity in August.
Ideas on these themes included:
Key feedback about the most important features of the park included:
When asked about preferred playground theme and equipment, a majority of participants expressed preference for a geometric playground theme and:
Other ideas suggested by participants included:
From July 17 to August 13, 2023, feedback on preferred park amenities was collected from the community through an online thought exchange activity. The thought exchange received a total of 110 responses, 114 ideas and, over 3,000 idea ratings.
Review a full summary of the results in an interactive report.
The most popular park uses included:
The most popular park amenities were a shade structure (70 per cent) and fitness equipment (50 per cent). Other feedback included a need for more sports fields (for cricket, tennis, basketball and softball), more lighting and a community garden.
In this phase, draft park designs will be presented to the community for feedback and revision. The design options will be based on the outcomes of Community Engagement Phase 1.
Anticipated community engagement activities in this phase include:
The vision statement and guiding principles from Phase 1 guided the development of the two park design options. These design options generally include the same amenities, but present different layouts and design themes.
Features in both designs include:
Key differences between the designs include:
On September 22, over 50 community members participated in a pop-up event at Silverview Park from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. Participants shared their preferences for park design options and features on display boards, using dot stickers to select their top choices and sticky notes to write comments. The event was co-hosted by the local Councillor’s office and the Silverview Community Association.
When asked about preferred park features, a majority of respondents indicated that:
If the proposed dog area is removed, more open green space or sports facilities can be added instead. When asked which of the options they preferred, the most popular responses were:
When asked which of the three options for sports facilities they preferred, the most popular responses were:
There were 44 additional ideas shared on sticky notes, and some comments were shared with the project team verbally. The most common comments shared included:
From August 26 to September 15, 199 community members provided feedback on the design options for the improvements at Silverview Park. The survey was available in English, Korean and Farsi. The feedback collected in this survey will be used to develop a final preferred design.
Overall, 40 per cent of respondents preferred this option.
Key feedback, with the total number of ‘agree’ responses in parentheses, follows:
When asked whether this option aligns with the community’s vision and guiding principles, 57 per cent of respondents said yes, 22 per cent were unsure and 22 per cent said no.
For those who selected no, feedback was collected on how this design option could be improved to better align with the community’s vision and design principles. 26 respondents provided the following feedback:
Overall, 42 per cent of respondents preferred this option.
Key feedback, with the total number of ‘agree’ responses in parentheses, follows:
When asked whether this option aligns with the community’s vision and guiding principles, 54 per cent of respondents said yes, 22 per cent were unsure and 24 per cent said no.
For those who selected no, feedback was collected on how this design option could be improved to better align with the community’s vision and design principles. 31 respondents provided the following feedback:
When community members were asked what type of seating they preferred, the most popular responses were:
When community members were asked what type of sports court/field they preferred, the most popular responses were:
When community members were asked what type of shade structure they preferred, the most popular responses were:
When community members were asked what type of fitness equipment they preferred, the most popular responses were:
Overall, when community members were asked how satisfied they were with the design options for the improved park:
Respondents were asked if they had additional ideas for creating a park design that achieves the vision statement and design principles for the park. 73 respondents (37 per cent of all survey participants) provided additional feedback. The following major themes emerged in the responses:
In this phase of the community engagement process, the project team will share the preferred design with the community.
The community engagement activity anticipated in this phase is an online survey. The anticipated outcome of this phase is a refined preferred design.
The project will then move into the detail design phase, where the design team will work through the technical details and develop detailed plans and drawings to be used by the construction contractor.