The City is bringing new soccer mini-pitches to parks across Toronto, creating more opportunities for people of all ages to play, learn and connect through sport. These new spaces are designed to be safe, inclusive and accessible, with locations selected based on equity needs, projected population growth, youth population and existing park amenities.

  • September 2025: Community engagement and design development
  • Late September 2025: Construction starts
  • June 2026: Construction complete

The timeline is subject to change. Construction across all parks is expected to take place around the same time.

Sign Up for Updates

Sign Up Now

Sign up for or unsubscribe from updates related to the Soccer for All Mini-Pitches project.

Level of Engagement

This project has been classified as a Consult project based on the International Association of Public Participation Spectrum. This means your input will help to confirm the location of a soccer mini-pitch within each park and the inclusion of any additional amenities to support their use.

December 2025

Online Survey

From November 11 to December 12, an online survey collected 137 responses with feedback on the proposed mini-pitch location and supporting amenities as Apted Park.

The survey was advertised through social media, park signs, the Soccer For All mailing list, and the local Councillor’s office.

General Feedback

When asked how often they play soccer:

  • 40 per cent of respondents indicated that they play a few times a week or more
  • 11 per cent of respondents indicated that they play once a week
  • Seven per cent of respondents indicated that they play a few times a month
  • 12 per cent of respondents indicated that they place once a month or less
  • 31 per cent of respondents don’t play soccer

When asked to describe their skill level:

  • 12 per cent describe their skill level as beginner
  • 36 per cent describe their skill level as intermediate
  • 28 per cent describe their skill as advanced

When asked how far they travel to get to Apted Park:

  • 49 per cent travel 0 to 0.5 km
  • 17 per cent travel 0.5 to 1km
  • 13 per cent travel 1 to 5 km
  • 15 per cent travel more than 5 km

When asked how likely they would be to use the mini-pitch:

  • 53 per cent of respondents indicated they would be very likely to use the mini-pitch
  • 13 per cent of respondents indicated they would be somewhat likely to use the mini-pitch
  • 8 per cent of respondents were unsure
  • 3 per cent of respondents indicated they would be unlikely to use the mini-pitch
  • 24 per cent of respondents indicated it would be very unlikely to use the mini-pitch.

When asked to rank the following amenities to include around the mini-pitch, respondents ranked them in the following order:

  1. Drinking fountain and water bottle filler
  2. Shade structure
  3. Seating options

In addition to four covered bleachers for spectators, respondents were asked to select their preferred seating types:

  • 67 per cent preferred flat benches for players
  • 54 per cent preferred backed benches for spectators

When asked what type of programming should be offered at the mini-pitch:

  • 69 per cent preferred open access (unsupervised play)
  • 60 per cent preferred drop-in (supervised open play by age group)
  • 56 per cent preferred recreational league play (supervised introductory league play)
  • 52 per cent preferred instructional (learn to play)
Amesbury Park Feedback

Of the 137 survey respondents, 54 (39 per cent) provided feedback on the proposed mini-pitch for Amesbury Park.

17 survey respondents opposing the proposed location of the mini-pitch in place of the existing baseball diamond. Of these respondents:

  • Seven were supportive of a mini-pitch at Apted Park but would prefer it not replace the baseball diamond.
  • Six were opposed to the proposed mini-pitch, primarily because it is seen as redundant given the park’s existing soccer field.
  • Several identified the baseball diamond as an important space for informal play of other sports and games to the community, such as:
    • soccer practice while the field is in use
    • cricket
    • ice rink in winter months
  • Some identified the baseball diamond’s role in informal baseball games by the local community.

Other comments and considerations included:

  • Several comments noting concerns about increased traffic to the area and parking availability as a result of the new amenity.
  • Several comments requesting the new pitch and surrounding area is properly maintained and garbage picked up.
  • A few comments noting concerns the new amenity encouraging loitering in the park.
  • A mix of opinions on lighting – some wanting to ensure the pitch is well lit, others concerned the lights will be a nuisance to the surrounding homes.

September 2025

Online Survey

From September 11 to 26, an online survey collected 284 responses with feedback on the proposed mini-pitch location and possible supporting amenities at Amesbury Park, Grandravine Park and Scarborough Village Park. The survey was advertised through social media, park signs, the project mailing list, and the local Councillor’s offices.

General Feedback

When asked how often they play soccer:

  • 45 per cent of respondents indicated that they play a few times a week or more
  • 12 per cent of respondents indicated that they play once a week
  • Seven per cent of respondents indicated that they play a few times a month
  • Nine per cent of respondents indicated that they place once a month or less
  • 27 per cent of respondents don’t play soccer

When asked to describe their skill level:

  • 23 per cent describe their skill level as beginner
  • 35 per cent describe their skill level as intermediate
  • 24 per cent describe their skill as advanced

When asked how likely they would be to use the mini-pitch:

  • 53 per cent of respondents indicated they would be very likely to use the mini-pitch
  • 17 per cent of respondents indicated they would be somewhat likely to use the mini-pitch
  • 12 per cent of respondents were unsure
  • seven per cent of respondents indicated they would be unlikely to use the mini-pitch
  • 12 per cent of respondents indicated it would be very unlikely to use the mini-pitch.
Amesbury Park Feedback

Of the 284 survey respondents, 160 (58 per cent) provided feedback on the proposed mini-pitch for Amesbury Park.

When asked how far they travel to get to Amesbury Park:

  • 34 per cent travel 0 to 0.5 km
  • 28 per cent travel 0.5 to 1km
  • 26 per cent travel 1 to 5 km
  • nine per cent travel more than 5 km

When asked to rank the following amenities to include around the mini-pitch, respondents ranked them in the following order:

  1. Drinking fountain and water bottle filler
  2. Seating options
  3. Shade structure

In addition to four covered bleachers for spectators, respondents were asked to select their preferred seating types:

  • 72 per cent preferred flat benches for players
  • 59 per cent preferred backed benches for spectators

When asked what type of programming should be offered at the mini-pitch:

  • 71 per cent preferred open access (unsupervised play)
  • 64 per cent preferred drop-in (supervised open play by age group)
  • 63 per cent preferred recreational league play (supervised introductory league play)
  • 60 per cent preferred instructional (learn to play)

 

A total of 38 comments were received with additional considerations for the new mini-pitch in Amesbury Park.

Five respondents requested a larger facility, noting that there is a lack of full-size soccer facilities to support the large number of leagues in the area.

Several respondents noted that the community currently uses the bocci fields and the parking lot behind the community centre as informal recreation and gathering spaces.

Several respondents noted concerns about loitering, drug use and violence in the park, with suggestions to add bright lighting and emergency buttons to improve safety.

Programming suggestions included ensuring the mini-pitch remains open for community use, that programs offered are kept low-cost to improve community access, and to allow field time for local clubs in the area.

Mixed comments were provided about turf, with some preferring turf and others opposing it due to climate and health concerns.

Other design considerations included adding more trees for shade and noise mitigation, adding more water-filling stations, and considering a fence around the mini-pitch area and including a dome to facilitate year-round use.

Location and Design Preferences (nine comments):

  • Strong preference for a full-size 11v11 soccer pitch instead of a mini-pitch.
  • Some suggested building the pitch at Maple Leaf Park rather than Amesbury Park.
  • Mini-pitch seen as inadequate for local soccer clubs and community needs.

Amenities and Infrastructure (eight comments):

  • Requests for lighting, water refill stations, garbage disposal, shaded benches, and accessible pathways.
  • Concerns about parking and washroom availability.

Other Park Priorities (six comments):

  • Calls to repair the toddler play area before investing in a soccer pitch.
  • Concerns about displacing existing amenities such as bocce courts, softball areas, and picnic spaces.
  • Suggestions for alternative uses, like an off-leash dog park.

Community Engagement (five comments):

  • Questions about whether the community was consulted and if the pitch will be open to all.
  • Suggestions for booking systems and inclusive programming.

Environmental and Wildlife Concerns (four comments):

  • Requests to protect naturalized areas and wildlife.
  • Suggestions for tree planting and noise mitigation.

Health and Turf Concerns (three comments):

  • Concerns about artificial turf (heat, chemicals, joint strain).
  • Preference for natural grass for safety and sustainability.

Additional Suggestions (three comments):

  • Programs for low-income families to access soccer.
  • Safety insurance for children and fencing around the pitch.
Grandravine Park Feedback

Of the 284 survey respondents, 118 (43 per cent) provided feedback on the proposed mini-pitch for Grandravine Park.

When asked how far they travel to get to Grandravine Park:

  • 46 per cent travel 0 to 0.5 km
  • 22 per cent travel 0.5 to 1km
  • 24 per cent travel 1 to 5 km
  • four per cent travel more than 5 km

When asked to rank the following amenities to include around the mini-pitch, respondents ranked them in the following order:

  1. Drinking fountain and water bottle filler
  2. Seating options
  3. Shade structure

In addition to four covered bleachers for spectators, respondents were asked to select their preferred seating types:

  • 75 per cent preferred flat benches for players
  • 70 per cent preferred backed benches for spectators

When asked what type of programming should be offered at the mini-pitch:

  • 69 per cent preferred open access (unsupervised play)
  • 65 per cent preferred drop-in (supervised open play by age group)
  • 65 per cent preferred recreational league play (supervised introductory league play)
  • 65 per cent preferred instructional (learn to play)

A total of 29 comments were received with additional considerations for the new mini-pitch in Grandravine Park.

Several respondents shared concerns about increased traffic to the area and requested that additional parking be considered for the park.

A few respondents noted safety and loitering concerns, with one suggesting securing and scheduled closure times to improve user safety.

Two respondents requested that the facility be full accessible to people of all abilities.

Other design considerations included increasing the facility size to a full soccer field, adding more shade, more seating like picnic tables and benches, more lighting, and consider adding a dome to facilitate year-round use.

Scarborough Village Park Feedback

Of the 284 survey respondents, 26 (nine per cent) provided feedback on the proposed mini-pitch for Scarborough Village Park.

When asked how far they travel to get to Scarborough Village Park:

  • 57 per cent travel 0 to 0.5 km
  • 14 per cent travel 0.5 to 1km
  • 10 per cent travel 1 to 5 km
  • 19 per cent travel more than 5 km

When asked to rank the following amenities to include around the mini-pitch, respondents ranked them in the following order:

  1. Drinking fountain and water bottle filler
  2. Seating options
  3. Shade structure

In addition to four covered bleachers for spectators, respondents were asked to select their preferred seating types:

  • 67 per cent preferred flat benches for players
  • 67 per cent preferred backed benches for spectators

When asked what type of programming should be offered at the mini-pitch:

  • 86 per cent preferred open access (unsupervised play)
  • 52 per cent preferred instructional (learn to play)
  • 52 per cent preferred drop-in (supervised open play by age group)
  • 38 per cent preferred recreational league play (supervised introductory league play)

A total of three respondents provided comments with additional considerations for the new mini-pitch in Scarborough Village Park. These included comments noting:

  • overall support for the new mini-pitch
  • a need for year-round parking near the park
  • the mini-pitch should be open and accessible to the neighbouring school’s students and noise should be considered given the schools proximity to the park.

The following parks will be the first to receive new soccer mini-pitches.

The new soccer mini-pitches are made possible by the Soccer for All Legacy Program, a long-term initiative using privately raised funds to build a more inclusive and equitable city through sport. The program aims to reduce barriers by creating safe, local play spaces in equity-deserving neighbourhoods, free programming that develops players, leaders and coaches, and pathways to training and employment in sport.