The City is adding a new skatepark in Confederation Park and is engaging the community to help determine its design. The skatepark will be located just south of the existing tennis courts, near the centre of the park. To make space for the new skatepark, the existing beach volleyball courts will be relocated slightly west, closer to Amberjack Boulevard.

While we aim to provide fully accessible content, there is no text alternative available for some of the content on this site. If you require alternate formats or need assistance understanding our maps, drawings, or any other content, please contact Thevishka Kanishkan at 416-394-2955.

  • Late 2024 to Early 2025: Hire a design team
  • Spring 2025: Community Engagement Phase 1
  • Summer 2025: Community Engagement Phase 2
  • Fall 2025: Community Engagement Phase 3
  • Early 2025 to Spring 2026: Design development
  • Summer 2026: Construction starts, existing volleyball courts close
  • Late 2026: Construction complete, skatepark opens and volleyball courts reopen at new location in the park

The timeline is subject to change.

Sign Up for Updates

Sign Up Now

Sign up for or unsubscribe from updates related to the Confederation Park New Skatepark.

Level of Engagement

This project has been classified as a Collaborate project based on the International Association of Public Participation Spectrum. This means we aim to partner with the public and stakeholders to identify preferred skate styles and features, develop design options and identify a preferred skatepark design.

In this phase of the community engagement process, the City and the design consultant engaged with community members, including the Skatepark Champions to develop an overall vision for the skatepark, which will guide the development of design options in Community Engagement Phase 2.

Draft Guiding Principles

Based on community feedback gathered in this phase and informed by the Toronto Skateboard Strategy, the guiding principles listed below were developed.

The design for the new skatepark at Confederation Park should prioritize the following.

Good flow

Ensure sufficient space for comfortable and optimal movement between features, with features arranged to allow repetition and progression.

Progression and Variety

Include a mix of street and transition elements with varying heights and difficulty levels to offer progressively harder challenges.

Comfort and community

Provide supporting amenities such as shade, lighting for evening use and seating for skaters and spectators.

Quality surface and materials

Use smooth concrete finishes and materials designed for longevity and performance.

Skatepark Champions

This phase also involved recruiting a team of Skatepark Champions to guide the project and collaborate with designers and the local community in developing the skatepark design. The Champions are skateboarders of all skill levels, from beginner to advanced, with members aged 12 to 48. The recruitment process aims to assemble a diverse team that is representative of the local community.

Community Engagement Meetings and Events

April 2025

Online Survey

From April 14 to 28, an online survey collected input from 297 respondents about preferences for the skate styles and features of the new skatepark.

  • 81 per cent of respondents said they were interested in the project because they are skateboarders
  • 19 per cent as local residents
  • 13 per cent as parents/guardians of skatepark users
  • Seven per cent as BMX riders
  • Six per cent as rollerskaters or rollerbladers
  • Five per cent as scooter riders

Respondents could select multiple reasons, so totals exceed 100 per cent.

Key feedback from skateboarders follows.

Terrain styles feedback
  • Overall, 41 per cent of skaters preferred transition terrain, 28 per cent preferred street terrain and 31 per cent liked both equally.
  • 38 per cent of skaters preferred open flow transition terrain, 37 per cent preferred enclosed transition terrain and 22 per cent liked both equally.
  • 51 per cent of skaters preferred flowing street terrain, 21 per cent liked both equally, and 17 per cent preferred technical street terrain.
Features feedback
  • Preferred transition terrain features included:
    • Bowl (73 per cent)
    • Mini ramp (68 per cent)
    • Spine (43 per cent)
    • Bank ramp (40 per cent)
    • Quarter pipe (39 per cent)
    • Pump track (31 per cent)
    • Roll-in (29 per cent),
    • Hip ramp (29 per cent)
    • Halfpipe (26 per cent)
  • Preferred street terrain features included:
    • Ledge (58 per cent)
    • Flat rail (51 per cent)
    • Manual pad (48 per cent)
    • Pyramid (43 per cent)
    • Stairs (36 per cent)
    • Flat ground or open space (34 per cent)
    • Up gap or euro gap (33 per cent)
    • Gap (32 per cent)
    • A-frame (31 per cent)
    • Fun box (25 per cent)
  • Repeated comments suggested adding a pool block, pole jam or slappy curb.
  • Design features skaters felt would benefit beginners included:
    • Progressive features (72 per cent)
    • Smaller features or obstacles (57 per cent)
    • Flat ground or open space (42 per cent)
    • Ledges or curbs (39 per cent)
    • Quarter pipes (32 per cent)
  • Repeated comments suggested adding a small-bowl or mini-ramp for beginners.

Additional repeated comments to make the new skatepark welcoming and accessible included requests for shade, lighting (which will be provided) and spectator seating outside skating areas. Washrooms and drinking fountains were also requested and are available at the Centennial Recreation Centre.

Community Spotlights

This section highlights perspectives from underrepresented groups. These viewpoints have been highlighted in an effort to ensure the park design reflects a diversity of lived experiences, cultural knowledge and community values. The project team analyzed responses from different user and demographic groups to identify where their feedback diverged from overall survey results. By highlighting perspectives that differ from the majority, we aim to support a design approach that is inclusive, representative and responsive to the needs of all communities.

Of the 242 respondents who identified as skaters, 88 identified as non-white. Among these skaters, there was a slightly higher preference for open flow transition terrain (45 per cent).

47 skaters identified as non-male. Among these skaters, there was a higher preference for transition terrain (53 per cent).

20 skaters identified as having a disability. Among these skaters, there was a higher preference for street terrain (45 per cent) and a higher preference for technical street terrain (40 per cent).

13 respondents identified as roller-skaters or rollerbladers. Among this group, there was

  • a lower preference for street terrain (15 per cent)
  • a higher preference for open flow transition (54 per cent)
  • a lower preference for enclosed transition
  • a higher preference for flowing street (77 per cent)

32 respondents identified as parents or guardians of skateboarders. Among this group, there was a higher preference for flowing street terrain (63 per cent)

Additional repeated comments to make the new skatepark welcoming and accessible included suggestions related to:

  • Seating (15 comments)
  • Lighting (11 comments)
  • Shade (10 comments)
  • Washrooms (nine comments)
  • Drinking fountains (nine comments)

March 2025

Skateboard Champions Meeting

On March 6, the project team met with the Skatepark Champions virtually. The discussion primarily focused on the four skateparks closest to Confederation Park (Neilson Park, Ellesmere Park, Fundy Bay Park and Cross Roads Skatepark at the Port Union Community Recreation Centre), with some discussion about the Champions’ other favourite skateparks in the Toronto area.

Champions discussed what they liked about these parks, what they would change and made suggestions for the skate styles and features that should be considered for the new skatepark at Confederation Park.

Repeated feedback about themes about layout included

  • Ensuring good flow with well-spaced, varied features that support progression
  • Prioritizing simplicity and quality over quantity
  • Including some flat ground space
  • Considering separate street and transition areas.

Champions suggested adding a unique skate feature that helps define the park’s identity and makes it a destination.

Recommended street terrain features included:

  • Long ledges
  • Mani pads with coping
  • Progressive stair obstacles
  • Slappy curbs
  • Rails
  • Hubbas

Recommended transition terrain features included:

  • Mini ramps
  • Different coping heights
  • Bowls
  • Flyouts
  • Roll-ins

Repeated themes about materials and surface included:

  • Ensuring a smooth concrete finish
  • Carefully considering drainage design
  • Using materials that resist chipping or cracking

Additional suggestions included:

  • Providing shade and seating for skaters and spectators
  • Creating space for community gatherings
  • Providing lighting for evening use
  • Considering trees which provide shade but won’t drop too many leaves in fall
  • Exploring the possibility of a roof over the skatepark

February 2025

Skateboard Champions Orientation Meeting

On February 12, the project team met with the Skatepark Champions virtually for an orientation meeting. The meeting included introductions, an overview of the project and the Skatepark Champions’ role, and a discussion of the group’s Terms of Reference.

January 2025

Skatepark Champions Application

From November 27, 2024, to January 2, 2025, community members could apply to become members of the project’s Skatepark Champions. The Champions will help guide the project and collaborate with designers and the local community to develop the skatepark design. The team will include skateboarders of all skill levels, from beginner to advanced. The City aimed to form a team as diverse and representative of the local community as possible.

In this phase of the community engagement process, the City and its design consultant worked off the outcomes of Community Engagement Phase 1 to develop three design options for the new skatepark. These designs will be presented to the community and Skatepark Champions for feedback and will be used to develop a preferred design for the skatepark.

The anticipated outcome of this phase is the selection of a preferred design.

Design Options

Design Option A

Design Option A includes a balance of terrain styles, including transition features (open and enclosed) and street features (flowing and technical).

Features that all skill levels will appreciate, like:

  • Flat ground/open space with fundamental technical street features
  • An A-frame bank
  • Banks of varying heights to allow for progression
  • A mini ramp that can be ridden into from the street zone flat or the roll-in corner
  • An enclosed organic bowl
  • Separate terrain zones that allow different riding styles to happen simultaneously

 Design Option A has two levels:

  • The lower level is the street zone on the north side, which is at ground level.
  • The higher level is the flat ground around the bowl in the south section, which is approximately one metre (3.3 feet) higher.

The northeast entrance is at ground level. The south entrance has steps and an accessible ramp to access the higher level.

Option A context amenity plan of Confederation Park, showing the proposed skate facility integrated with surrounding park features. Park features are described in the list immediately following the image.

  1. Existing pathway
  2. New pathway
  3. Skatepark entrance
  4. Accessible ramp
  5. Benches
  6. Shade tables with umbrellas
  7. Water bottle filler
  8. Skatepark lighting
  9. Relocated beach volleyball courts
Option A for the skatepark design with numbers that correspond to skate features described in the list immediately following the image.
Design Option A, with street-style features labelled with numbers 1 through 7 and transition-style features numbered 7 and 8.
  1. Two-foot bank to curb
  2. 3.5-foot bank
  3. 14-inch ledge
  4. Eight-inch manual pad next to A-frame bank
  5. Two-foot A-frame bank with rail
  6. 12-inch round flat rail
  7. Three-foot to four-foot mini ramp with roll-in corner
  8. Four-foot to 5.5-foot enclosed organic bowl

Design Option B

Design Option B includes a balance of terrain styles including open and enclosed transition features and technical street features

Features that all skill levels will appreciate, like:

  • A technical street zone with:
    • terraced platforms of varying heights to allow for progression
    • flat ground/open space with fundamental technical street features
    • two four-stairsets
  • A quarter pipe
  • An enclosed flow bowl with a roll-in to allow beginners to access transition terrain
  • Separate terrain zones that allow different riding styles to happen simultaneously

Design Option B has three levels:

  • The lowest level is the street zone on the north side, which is at ground level.
  • The middle level is the street zone where the manual pad is located, which is approximately 0.75 metres (2.5 feet) higher.
  • The highest level is the bowl zone on the south side, which is another 0.6 metres (two feet) higher.

The northeast entrance is at ground level. The south entrance has steps and an accessible ramp to access the highest level.

Option B Context amenity plan of Confederation Park, showing the proposed skate facility integrated with surrounding park features. Park features are described in the list immediately following the image.

  1. Existing pathway
  2. New pathway
  3. Skatepark entrance
  4. Accessible ramp
  5. Benches
  6. Shade tables with umbrellas
  7. Water bottle filler
  8. Skatepark lighting
  9. Relocated beach volleyball courts
Option B for the skatepark design with numbers that correspond to skate features described in the list immediately following the image.
Design Option B, with street-style features labelled with numbers 1 through 9 and transition-style features numbered 10 and 11.
  1. Three-foot bank
  2. Four-foot to 1.5-foot bank
  3. 2.5-foot steep bank
  4. 12-inch round flat rail
  5. Eight-inch manual pad
  6. Four-stairset with ledge terrace
  7. Six-inch slappy curb
  8. 2.5-foot bank to rail
  9. Four-stairset with manual pad terrace
  10. Enclosed flow bowl with four-foot mini ramp zone including roll-in corner and 5.5-foot teacup deep end
  11.  Four-foot quarter pipe

Design Option C

Design Option C includes a balance of terrain styles, including transition features (open and enclosed) and street features (flowing and technical), while prioritizing transition and pump zone features

Features that all skill levels will appreciate, like:

  • Flat ground/open space flowing into a pump zone with roll-in or roll-over elements and blended transition features
  • A large bowl with a mini ramp pocket, hips and extension pocket
  • Different sizes of quarter pipes for progressive learning
  • Essential technical street features
  • Separate terrain zones that allow different riding styles to happen simultaneously
  • A seven-stairset and down rail that offers more advanced riders a challenging feature

Design Option C has two levels:

  • The lower level is the pump zone on the east side.
  • The higher level is the flat ground around the bowl on the west side, which is about one metre (3.3 feet) higher.

Both levels have entrances with steps and an accessible ramp.

Option C context amenity plan of Confederation Park, showing the proposed skate facility integrated with surrounding park features. Park features are described in the list immediately following the image.

  1. Existing pathway
  2. New pathway
  3. Skatepark entrance
  4. Accessible ramp
  5. Benches
  6. Shade tables with umbrellas
  7. Water bottle filler
  8. Skatepark lighting
  9. Relocated beach volleyball courts
Option C for the skatepark design with numbers that correspond to skate features described in the list immediately following the image.
Design Option C, with street-style features labelled with numbers 1 through 5 and transition-style features numbered 6 through 13.
  1. 14-inch ledge
  2. 12-inch round flat rail
  3. 16-inch skateable seating island ledge
  4. Seven-stairset with handrail
  5. 5-foot bank with hip
  6. Two-foot quarter pipe
  7. Four-foot to 5.5-foot enclosed flow bowl with extension pocket
  8. Pump zone transition rising pocket
  9. Five-foot quarter pipe with hip
  10. Pump zone three-foot roll-in transition
  11. Pump zone roller blending to 2.5-foot volcano
  12. Pump zone two-foot spine with pump-bump ends
  13. Four-foot quarter pipe stepping down to three-foot quarter pipe

Community Engagement Meetings and Events

September 2025

Online Survey

From September 3 to 24, an online survey gathered feedback on the three design options from 367 community members.

  • 78 per cent of respondents said they were interested in the project because they are skateboarders
  • 14 per cent as parents/guardians of skatepark users
  • 13 per cent as local residents
  • Seven per cent as BMX riders
  • Six per cent as rollerskaters or rollerbladers
  • Three per cent as scooter riders

Respondents could select multiple reasons, so totals exceed 100 per cent.

Respondents were asked to indicate their level of agreement with statements about each of the design options.

Design Option A
  • 80 per cent agreed that there is enough space between the skatepark features to move between them comfortably.
  • 80 per cent agreed that there is a good mix of street and transition features.
  • 76 per cent agreed that the skatepark provides opportunities for progression from easier to more difficult features.
  • 83 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for beginners to learn.
  • 76 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for skatepark users of all skill levels to challenge themselves.

56 respondents provided additional feedback about Design Option A. Common themes included:

  • requests for pool block or coping on the bowl (15 comments)
  • requests that the bowl be deeper (11 comments)
  • concerns regarding flow (five comments)
Design Option B
  • 72 per cent agreed that there is enough space between the skatepark features to move between them comfortably.
  • 76 per cent agreed that there is a good mix of street and transition features.
  • 72 per cent agreed that the skatepark provides opportunities for progression from easier to more difficult features.
  • 78 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for beginners to learn.
  • 71 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for skatepark users of all skill levels to challenge themselves.

42 respondents provided additional feedback about Design Option B. Common themes included:

  • requests that the bowl be deeper (seven comments)
  • requests for pool block or coping on the bowl (four comments)
  • concerns regarding flow (four comments)
  • requests that the roll-in be removed or relocated (three comments)
  • concerns that the street section is too advanced (three comments
Design Option C
  • 75 per cent agreed that there is enough space between the skatepark features to move between them comfortably.
  • 74 per cent agreed that there is a good mix of street and transition features.
  • 76 per cent agreed that the skatepark provides opportunities for progression from easier to more difficult features.
  • 74 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for beginners to learn.
  • 72 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for skatepark users of all skill levels to challenge themselves.

41 respondents provided additional feedback about Design Option C. Common themes included:

  • requests that the bowl be deeper (five comments)
  • negative feedback on the pumpzone or balance of street and transition (four comments)

When asked to rank the proposed designs in order of overall preference, respondents ranked Design Option A highest (53 per cent), followed by Design Option B (28 per cent) and Design Option C (20 per cent).

Community Spotlights

This section highlights perspectives from underrepresented groups. These viewpoints have been highlighted in an effort to ensure the park design reflects a diversity of lived experiences, cultural knowledge and community values. The project team analyzed responses from different user and demographic groups to identify where their feedback diverged from overall survey results. By highlighting perspectives that differ from the majority, we aim to support a design approach that is inclusive, representative and responsive to the needs of all communities.

Of the 285 respondents who identified as skaters, 128 identified as non-white. When asked to rank the proposed designs in order of overall preference, respondents ranked Design Option A highest (56 per cent).

110 skaters identified as non-male. When asked to rank the proposed designs in order of overall preference, respondents ranked Design Option A highest (51 per cent).

Six skaters identified as having a disability. When asked to rank the proposed designs in order of overall preference, respondents ranked Design Option C highest (64 per cent).

51 respondents identified as parents or guardians of skateboarders. When asked to rank the proposed designs in order of overall preference, respondents ranked Design Option A highest (43 per cent).

26 respondents identified as BMX riders. When asked to rank the proposed designs in order of overall preference, respondents ranked Design Option C highest (47 per cent).

21 respondents identified as roller-skaters. When asked to rank the proposed designs in order of overall preference, respondents ranked Design Option C highest (59 per cent).

From all survey participants, 29 participants provided feedback on how the skatepark can be more welcoming, inclusive and accessible. Common themes included:

  • Requests for amenities such as water fountains (five comments), washrooms (five comments), lighting (four comments) and seating (three comments)
  • Comments requesting more variation in feature heights (four comments)
  • Requests for additional features (four comments)

58 participants provided additional, general feedback. Common themes included:

  • Requests for additional features (16 comments)
  • Positive comments regarding the skatepark (14 comments)
  • Comments questioning whether the skatepark is needed in the area (fout comments)
  • Comments regarding the relocation of the beach volleyball courts (three comments)
  • Requests for amenities such as washrooms (three comments), lighting (four comments) and seating (three comments)
Virtual Information Meeting

On September 16, the project team hosted a virtual information meeting from 6 to 7:30 p.m. to present the project and design options to approximately six community members. The project team and skatepark designers answered questions about the project and designs in the meeting.

The presentation will be posted on this page.

In-Person Pop-Up Event

On September 3, 38 community members participated in a pop-up event at Ellesmere Skatepark from 4 to 7 p.m.

Participants were asked to indicate their level of agreement with statements about each of the design options.

Design Option A
  • 89 per cent agreed that there is enough space between the skatepark features to move between them comfortably.
  • 89 per cent agreed that there is a good mix of street and transition features.
  • 57 per cent agreed that the skatepark provides opportunities for progression from easier to more difficult features.
  • 100 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for beginners to learn.
  • 90 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for skatepark users of all skill levels to challenge themselves.

Four respondents provided additional feedback about Design Option A. All four comments requested that stairs be added to the design.

Design Option B
  • 37 per cent agreed that there is enough space between the skatepark features to move between them comfortably.
  • 100 per cent agreed that there is a good mix of street and transition features.
  • 100 per cent agreed that the skatepark provides opportunities for progression from easier to more difficult features.
  • 84 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for beginners to learn.
  • 40 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for skatepark users of all skill levels to challenge themselves.

One respondent provided additional feedback about Design Option B, commenting that they were unsure about the back-and-forth flow.

Design Option C
  • 100 per cent agreed that there is enough space between the skatepark features to move between them comfortably.
  • 50 per cent agreed that there is a good mix of street and transition features.
  • 75 per cent agreed that the skatepark provides opportunities for progression from easier to more difficult features.
  • 67 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for beginners to learn.
  • 42 per cent agreed that the skatepark offers opportunities for skatepark users of all skill levels to challenge themselves.

Seven respondents provided additional feedback about Design Option.  Comments included requests for additional features and for more seating.

July 2025

Skateboard Champions Meeting

On July 23, the project team met with the Skatepark Champions virtually to discuss the three preliminary design options.

Following a presentation from the designers explaining the three design options and their features, the Champions split into two groups to discuss the designs. The Champions were asked to discuss how well each design reflected the project’s guiding principles, what was working and what could be improved.

Following the Champions meeting, the designs were refined based on the Champions’ input before being presented to the public in September.

Design Option A
  • Both groups felt the miniramp was a useful and accessible feature, with one group feeling that it provided helpful separation between sections.
  • One group felt this design had good flow but might be too simple, while the other group was concerned with congestion and felt that the street area might be too busy.
  • A variety of changes to features were suggested, including adding more features at the north border of the design, adding standalone ledges and adding a roll-in to the bowl to make it more accessible.
Design Option B
  • Both groups appreciated the diverse features and three levels.
  • One group felt the design had good flow and was not crowded, while the other group found the design cluttered.
Design Option C
  • Both groups appreciated the unique bowl and variety of features.
  • One group felt the park was appealing for all, while the other noted that this park might be less accessible to beginner skaters.
  • Both groups were concerned about a path dividing the skatepark*.

*This path was in the preliminary design option only. In response to the Champions’ concerns, the path was moved in the design later presented to the public.

In this phase of the community engagement process, the City will share the preferred design with the community and Skatepark Champions. When the preferred design is confirmed, the project will move into the detailed design phase, where the design team will finalize the design by working through the technical details and drawings for the construction contractor.

The outcome of this phase is a refined preferred design.

The community engagement events anticipated in this phase include:

  • a Skatepark Champions meeting
  • a community pop-up event or open house

The decision to add a skatepark in Confederation Park is informed by the Skateboard Strategy and the Parks and Recreation Facilities Plan. The City reviewed existing skatepark facilities across the city to identify areas where new or improved facilities are needed to enhance access to the activity city-wide.

Through this process, Scarborough-Guildwood was identified as an area lacking skatepark facilities. Confederation Park was selected as the best location for a skatepark in this Ward based on the following criteria:

  • Geographic location
  • Site characteristics, including adequate space and suitable topography
  • Available supporting amenities, including washrooms, parking lots and transit access
  • Demographics of the area, including the size of the child and youth population
  • Safety considerations, such as clear sightlines and proximity to other recreational amenities

The skatepark design will be developed in consultation with the community. Budget, site limitations and operational requirements will also be considered throughout the design process.

A map showing the location of the new skatepark and the relocated volleyball court, described immediately after the image.

A map of Confederation Park that shows the proposed skatepark location and relocated volleyball courts near the middle of the park, south of Centennial Recreation Centre. The map includes surrounding streets: Ellesmere Road to the north, Dolly Varden Boulevard to the east, Brimorton Drive to the south, and Amberjack Boulevard to the west. Nearby landmarks include Bellmere Junior Public School and the park’s sports courts, playground, washroom, off-leash area, and parking lot.