|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
A
step forward in time
Toronto's New City Hall |
 |
| |
|
City Hall under construction
June 22, 1964
Photographer: Panda Associates
City of Toronto Archives, SC 268, Item 462
|
|
| |
|
Introduction
International competition
Viljo Revell's winning design
Sod turning
|
Time
capsule
Construction
Official opening
Public art
|
|
| |
|
A step forward in time: Toronto's New City Hall
Viljo Revell, the architect of City Hall, did not live to see the
opening of this impressive and uniquely designed building. His legacy,
however, remains a major architectural accomplishment. Revell’s design
was viewed by many as representing a break with tradition. Former
Mayor Phil Givens claimed that “new City Hall has provided staid old
Toronto with the impetus and architectural inspiration with which
to proceed.…” Indeed, despite the considerable controversy and debate
among architectural traditionalists, this award-winning design represented
a step forward in time and was repeatedly described as ‘monumental’
and ‘expressionistically modern.
September 13, 2005 marks the 40th anniversary of the opening of City
Hall. To commemorate the anniversary, the City of Toronto Archives
has mounted this exhibit to provide a brief architectural history
of the events leading up to and including the opening of City Hall.
The information in this display was drawn from a larger exhibition
entitled Meeting Places: Toronto’s City Halls, which was
co-curated by Professor Douglas Richardson and Stephen Otto for the
Market Gallery in 1985. The historical materials shown were selected
from the holdings of the City of Toronto Archives.
Original negatives
by Panda Associates are housed at the Canadian Architectural Archives
at the University of Calgary, who gave their kind permission for the
photographs to be reproduced and displayed here.
|
|
| |
|
Proposal for
City Hall, Toronto
Marani & Morris, Mathers & Haldenby, Shore & Moffat
1955
Rendering by Schell Lewis
City of Toronto Archives, PT 344-C-5
|
|
| |
|
City Hall Project by Marani & Morris, Mathers &
Haldenby, Shore & Moffat
In 1955 City Council decided to ask the electorate to approve
spending $18,000,000 on this proposal for a new city hall drafted
by a consortium. The three firms (Marani & Morris, Mathers &
Haldenby, Shore & Moffat) were noted for substantial institutional
buildings of refined materials but conservative form. Their design
called for two formal tree-lined public squares above an underground
parking structure—one square with reflecting pools for the old Registry
Office, a larger one without for the proposed City Hall. For the
Hall itself they would have put a tall office slab across the back
of the site, but reduced its impact through a U-shaped structure
of three storeys in front. The low building would house public-access
areas, aldermanic offices and committee rooms, with the Council
Chamber in the middle (behind a shallow balcony for ‘certain public
functions’); it would also enclose a courtyard through open colonnades
on three sides as shown in these original renderings by a leading
American delineator, Schell Lewis.
When the City
Hall project was published in the autumn of 1955, architectural
students at the University of Toronto denounced it as ‘dull and
uninteresting and indistinguishable from…insurance buildings’ by
these firms, an ‘inhuman pile of stones,’ ‘a funeral home of vast
dimensions,’ comparable to Russian institutional architecture. Coverage
in the student newspaper, The Varsity, was picked up by Toronto
dailies and undoubtedly influenced the plebiscite in which the proposal
was defeated. This final outburst on voting day described the need
for detailed requirements, the ideal city hall, and the desirability
of an international competition following careful guidelines.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
|