City of Toronto Logo Contents

Considered by City Council on
April 29 and 30, 2009



Government Management Committee


Meeting No. 22   Contact Betty Henderson
Meeting Date Wednesday, April 15, 2009
  Phone 416-392-8088
Start Time 9:30 AM
  E-mail gmc@toronto.ca
Location Committee Room 1, City Hall
  Chair   Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby  

Item  

GM22.1 Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes – April 2009 Hearing (Ward: All)

GM22.2 Apportionment of Property Taxes – April 2009 Hearing (Ward: All)

GM22.3 Pilot Project Between the City of Toronto, the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, and the Oxford Group (Ward: All)

GM22.4 City-Wide Security Plan (Ward: All)

GM22.6 Request for Authority to Enter into 311 Routing Agreements with Neighbouring Municipalities (Ward: All)

GM22.10 Out-of-Province Parking Ticket Collection Pilot Program (Ward: All)

GM22.11 Licence Agreement with the Minister of Energy and Infrastructure for the Use of Provincial Lands in Flemingdon Park (Ward: 26)

GM22.12 Master Child Care Lease Agreement between City of Toronto and Toronto Community Housing Corporation (Ward: 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12, 20, 24, 28, 35, 37, 40, 43)

GM22.13 1500 Don Mills Road – Lease Amending and Extension Agreement and Designation as a Municipal Capital Facility (Ward: 34)

GM22.14 York University Acquisition – Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension (South of Steeles) (Ward: 8)

GM22.15 Procurement of Used Vehicles and Equipment (Ward: All)

GM22.16 Green Fleet Plan 2008 - 2011 – Annual Update (2008) (Ward: All)

GM22.17 Contract Award - Tender Call 192-2008 for Old City Hall, 60 Queen Street West, HVAC and Electrical Upgrade (Ward: 27)

GM22.18 Agreement with Toronto Catholic District School Board for Tiny Tots Program at Venerable John Merlini Catholic School (Ward: 7)

GM22.19 Grange Park Revitalization (Ward: 20)



City of Toronto Amended Committee Report
City of Toronto Logo Committee Report

Considered by City Council on:
April 29 and 30, 2009



Government Management Committee


Meeting No. 22   Contact Betty Henderson
Meeting Date Wednesday, April 15, 2009
  Phone 416-392-8088
Start Time 9:30 AM
  E-mail gmc@toronto.ca
Location Committee Room 1, City Hall
  Chair   Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby  

GM22.1

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: All 

Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes – April 2009 Hearing
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.                  City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to section 323 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 resulting in tax reductions (excluding phase-in/capping amounts) totalling $835,233.37 including reductions in Business Improvements Area charges, as identified in Appendix A, excluding the following applications:

 

Section 323 -Appendix A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ward

Number

Appeal

Number

Tax Year

Assessment Roll

Number

Property         Location

Reason for

Adjournment

Tax Adjustment

15

200800708

2008

1914 03 1 220 00200

777 Vaughan Rd

  Under staff review

0.00

18

200800720

2008

1904 04 1 470 00100

1199 Queen St W

  Under staff review

6,618.76

19

200800653

2008

1904 04 3 060 01300

229 Bellwoods Ave

  Under staff review

0.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

6,618.76

 

2.         City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to section 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 resulting in tax reductions (excluding phase-in/capping adjustments) totalling $137,432.72 including reductions in Business Improvements Area charges, excluding the following applications:

 

Section 325 -Appendix B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ward

Number

Appeal

Number

Tax Year

Assessment Roll

Number

Property         Location

Reason for

Adjournment

Tax Adjustment

27

200800491

2006

1904 06 6 270 01200

215 Church St.

  Under staff review

5,282.47

27

200800492

2007

1904 06 6 270 01200

215 Church St.

  Under staff review

5,321.26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 10,603.73

 

————
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.                  City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to section 323 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 resulting in tax reductions (excluding phase-in/capping amounts) totalling $835,233.37 including reductions in Business Improvements Area charges, as identified in Appendix A, excluding the following applications:

 

Section 323 -Appendix A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ward

Number

Appeal

Number

Tax Year

Assessment Roll

Number

Property         Location

Reason for

Adjournment

Tax Adjustment

15

200800708

2008

1914 03 1 220 00200

777 Vaughan Rd

  Under staff review

0.00

18

200800720

2008

1904 04 1 470 00100

1199 Queen St W

  Under staff review

6,618.76

19

200800653

2008

1904 04 3 060 01300

229 Bellwoods Ave

  Under staff review

0.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

6,618.76

 

2.         City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to section 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 resulting in tax reductions (excluding phase-in/capping adjustments) totalling $137,432.72 including reductions in Business Improvements Area charges, excluding the following applications:

 

Section 325 -Appendix B

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ward

Number

Appeal

Number

Tax Year

Assessment Roll

Number

Property         Location

Reason for

Adjournment

Tax Adjustment

27

200800491

2006

1904 06 6 270 01200

215 Church St.

  Under staff review

5,282.47

27

200800492

2007

1904 06 6 270 01200

215 Church St.

  Under staff review

5,321.26

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

 10,603.73

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee held a Statutory Public Hearing on Wednesday, April 15, 2009, in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.  No one appeared before the Committee.

Origin
(March 27, 2009) Report from the Acting Treasurer
Summary

This report deals with tax appeal applications made to the Treasurer pursuant to sections 323 and 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (COTA).  Section 323 permits Council to cancel, reduce or refund taxes in cases when, during the year, a property undergoes changes such as when it is destroyed by fire or demolished, becomes exempt from taxation, or is reclassified due to a change in its use.  Under section 325 of the COTA, taxpayers can request a cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes when an error in the assessment roll is identified which results in an overcharge.

 

The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting where the applicants may make a submission in defence of their position.  Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee.

 

Staff have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers and recommend approval of the applications as listed in Appendices A and B.

 

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes - April 2009 Hearing
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20206.pdf)

Appendix A - GM22-1
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20207.pdf)

Appendix B - GM22-1
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20208.pdf)


GM22.2

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: All 

Apportionment of Property Taxes – April 2009 Hearing
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.                  City Council approve the apportionment of property taxes in the amounts identified in Appendix A and Appendix B, under the columns entitled “Apportioned Tax” and “Apportioned Phase In/Capping”, excluding the following applications:

 

Page No.

Tax Year

Original Roll No.

Tax Roll No. for Apportioned Properties

Tax Apportionment

Ward No.

Treasurer Initiated Applications - Appendix A:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 of 22

2007

1908-09-1-141-00550

1908-09-1-141-00801

 

 

 

 

(19 Avondale Ave)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1908-09-1-141-00859

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$26,227.57

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 of 22

2007

1908-09-1-148-00111

1908-09-1-141-00801

 

 

 

 

(1 Avondale Ave)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1908-09-1-141-01002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$101,170.46

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

17 OF 22

2008

1901-12-7-280-00101

1901-12-7-280-00301

 

 

 

 

(9310 Sheppard Ave. E.)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1901-12-7-280-00387

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$18,373.37

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

21 of 22

2008

1906-04-4-120-01900

1906-04-4-120-00501

 

 

 

 

(207 Randolph Rd.)

1906-04-4-120-00502

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$2,887.24

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

21 of 22

2008

1906-04-4-120-02000

1906-04-4-120-00502

 

 

 

 

(209 Randolph Rd.)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1906-04-4-120-00505

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$2,887.24

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

21 of 22

2008

1906-04-4-120-02100

1906-04-4-120-00505

 

 

 

 

(237 McRae Dr.)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1906-04-4-120-00510

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$6,474.43

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

21 of 22

2008

1906-04-4-120-02200

1906-04-4-120-00510

 

 

 

 

(241 McRae Dr.)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1906-04-4-120-00513

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$5,249.54

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

17 of 22

2008

1901-09-4-200-01100

1901-09-4-200-01102

 

 

 

 

(27 White Ave.)

1901-09-4-200-01104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$2,703.51

44

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

————
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.                  City Council approve the apportionment of property taxes in the amounts identified in Appendix A and Appendix B, under the columns entitled “Apportioned Tax” and “Apportioned Phase In/Capping”, excluding the following applications:

 

Page No.

Tax Year

Original Roll No.

Tax Roll No. for Apportioned Properties

Tax Apportionment

Ward No.

Treasurer Initiated Applications - Appendix A:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 of 22

2007

1908-09-1-141-00550

1908-09-1-141-00801

 

 

 

 

(19 Avondale Ave)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1908-09-1-141-00859

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$26,227.57

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 of 22

2007

1908-09-1-148-00111

1908-09-1-141-00801

 

 

 

 

(1 Avondale Ave)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1908-09-1-141-01002

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$101,170.46

23

 

 

 

 

 

 

17 OF 22

2008

1901-12-7-280-00101

1901-12-7-280-00301

 

 

 

 

(9310 Sheppard Ave. E.)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1901-12-7-280-00387

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$18,373.37

42

 

 

 

 

 

 

21 of 22

2008

1906-04-4-120-01900

1906-04-4-120-00501

 

 

 

 

(207 Randolph Rd.)

1906-04-4-120-00502

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$2,887.24

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

21 of 22

2008

1906-04-4-120-02000

1906-04-4-120-00502

 

 

 

 

(209 Randolph Rd.)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1906-04-4-120-00505

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$2,887.24

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

21 of 22

2008

1906-04-4-120-02100

1906-04-4-120-00505

 

 

 

 

(237 McRae Dr.)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1906-04-4-120-00510

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$6,474.43

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

21 of 22

2008

1906-04-4-120-02200

1906-04-4-120-00510

 

 

 

 

(241 McRae Dr.)

Range to

 

 

 

 

 

1906-04-4-120-00513

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$5,249.54

26

 

 

 

 

 

 

17 of 22

2008

1901-09-4-200-01100

1901-09-4-200-01102

 

 

 

 

(27 White Ave.)

1901-09-4-200-01104

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total:

$2,703.51

44

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee held a Statutory Public Hearing on Wednesday, April 15, 2009, in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

Origin
(March 27, 2009) Report from the Acting Treasurer
Summary

This report deals with 71 tax apportionment applications made by the Treasurer or to the Treasurer by an owner of land pursuant to section 322 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the properties listed in Appendices A and B (attached).

 

The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting at which the applicants and/or property owners may make representations.  Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee. 

 

Staff have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers advising of the upcoming hearing before the Government Management Committee.

 

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Apportionment of Property Taxes - April 2009 Hearing
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20209.pdf)

Appendix A - GM22-2
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20210.pdf)

Appendix B - GM22-2
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20211.pdf)

Communications (Committee)
(April 15, 2009) submission from Zirka Jakibchuk (GM.New.GM22.2.1)
Speakers (Committee)

Zirka Jakibchuk (Submission Filed)


GM22.3

 

Amended 

 

Ward: All 

Pilot Project Between the City of Toronto, the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, and the Oxford Group
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Toronto Office of Partnerships, in conjunction with Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, to prepare the necessary documentation for the Purchasing and Materials Management Division to apply the Swiss Challenge procedure to the Wired Canada Program proposal.

 

2.         City Council approve, in principle, the proposed pilot project, involving the City’s Information and Technology Division, the Toronto Community Housing Corporation and the Oxford Group and authority be granted for the execution of any documents necessary to give effect thereto.

 

3.         City Council direct the Information and Technology Division and the Toronto Community Housing Corporation to report to Government Management Committee on the results of the pilot project.

 

4.         City Council refer the following motions to the Board of Directors, Toronto Community Housing Corporation for consideration:

 

            Moved by Councillor Moscoe

 

            That Lawrence Height be considered the potential Toronto Community Housing Corporation location for the Wired Canada Program Pilot Project.

 

            Moved by Councillor Nunziata

 

            That Mount Dennis-Weston be considered the potential Toronto Community Housing Corporation location for the Wired Canada Program Pilot Project.

 

            Moved by Councillor Perruzza

 

            That Emery Village be considered the potential Toronto Community Housing Corporation location for the Wired Canada Program Pilot Project.

 

            Moved by Councillor Thompson

 

                        That Dorset Park be considered the potential Toronto Community Housing Corporation location for the Wired Canada Program Pilot Project.

 

5.         City Council receive the report (January 28, 2009) from the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Toronto Office of Partnerships, in conjunction with Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, to prepare the necessary documentation for the Purchasing and Materials Management Division to apply the Swiss Challenge procedure to the Wired Canada Program proposal.

 

2.         City Council approve, in principle, the proposed pilot project, involving the City’s Information and Technology Division, the Toronto Community Housing Corporation and the Oxford Group and authority be granted for the execution of any documents necessary to give effect thereto.

 

3.         City Council direct the Information and Technology Division and the Toronto Community Housing Corporation to report to Government Management Committee on the results of the pilot project.

 

4.         City Council receive the report (January 28, 2009) from the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee:

 

1.         Requested the Director of Information and Technology to:

 

a.         submit a report to the Government Management Committee for its meeting of September 17, 2009 on:

 

i.          the feasibility of providing free wi-fi services at City Hall and other City buildings and facilities; and

 

ii.          a possible or potential application for the “Free the Net” network as applied in the City of San Francisco; and

 

b.          in consultation with the Partnerships Office, invite interested and qualified companies, and representatives from Meraki and the City of San Francisco to attend the September 17, 2009 Government Management Committee meeting to give a presentation to the Committee on this service.

 

2.         Allocated a half day of the September 17, 2009 meeting to discuss this service.

Origin
(March 30, 2009) Report from the Chief Information Officer, Information and Technology Division, and the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships
Summary

The Toronto Office of Partnerships (TOP) received an unsolicited proposal in 2008 from a private company (the Oxford Group) to establish and maintain, at no cost to the City, internet-ready computers that can be freely accessed by the public in City facilities. This initiative, called the Wired Canada Program (WCP), is financed by corporate sponsorships. Specifically, each of the 1,000 public access computers will exhibit up to 30 corporate “launch icons” on their respective screensavers. Users will have the option to either access the websites of these sponsors via the displayed icons or to bypass the corporate icons altogether and directly connect to the internet.

 

In the near future, as part of its Dark Fibre Agreement, the City of Toronto will have access to four stands of unlit or unactivated (dark) fibre to be used only for public policy purposes.

 

It is proposed that a pilot project be conducted at a Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) site in a priority neighbourhood, utilizing the Oxford Group’s computer hardware and software, and the City’s dark fibre network capacity. The purpose of the pilot project is to ascertain the implementation and operational issues associated with the establishment of this type of facility prior to expanding the initiative City-wide.

 

Upon successful completion of the pilot project, the intent would be to proceed with a full deployment of all 1,000 computers into various community centres and community housing sites throughout the City.

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Pilot Project Between the City of Toronto, the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, and the Oxford Group
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20212.pdf)

Appendix 1 - GM22-3
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20213.pdf)

Appendix 2 - GM22-3
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20214.pdf)

Appendix 3 - GM22-3
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20215.pdf)


3a An Unsolicited Proposal – The Wired Canada Program
Origin
(January 28, 2009) Report from the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships
Summary

The Toronto Office of Partnerships (TOP) received an unsolicited proposal in 2008 in which a private firm has offered to establish and maintain, at no cost to the City, internet-ready computers that can be freely accessed by the public in City facilities. This initiative, called the Wired Canada Program (WCP), is financed by corporate sponsorships. Specifically, each of the 1,000 public access computers will exhibit up to 30 corporate “launch icons” on their respective screensavers. Users will have the option to either access the websites of these sponsors via the displayed icons or to bypass the corporate icons altogether and directly connect to the internet.

 

After TOP reviewed the proposal with various City Programs, both the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) and the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division (PF&R) deemed the initiative to have merit and indicated an interest in having the computers placed in various community centres and community housing sites. Having also assessed the prospects of the proposal with relevant corporate staff, the purpose of this report is to request that Council approve the initiative in principle and that the proponent’s plan be subjected to the Swiss Challenge (a specialized Request For Proposal process) as mandated by the City’s Unsolicited Quotations or Proposals Policy.

 

Background Information (Committee)
Report - An Unsolicited Proposal - The Wired Canada Program
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-19904.pdf)

Appendix 1 - GM22-3a
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-19907.pdf)

Appendix 2 - GM22-3a
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-19905.pdf)

Appendix 3 - GM22-3a
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-19906.pdf)

Speakers (Committee)

Jonathan Goldsbie, Campaign Coordinator, Toronto Public Space Committee
Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ward 34, Don Valley East


GM22.4

 

Amended 

 

Ward: All 

City-Wide Security Plan
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council adopt the City-wide Security Plan, including the revised Corporate Security framework, and the Corporate Security Policy as attached (Attachment 1), with Section 8.5 amended to reflect changes that Council has made in its graffiti removal policy; namely, each division, board, agency and commission must:

 

a.         develop the capacity to remove graffiti from the property under their care;

 

b.         shall be responsible for removing graffiti from their property; and

 

c.         if graffiti has to be removed by enforcement, the cost will be deducted from their division's budget, or where applicable, will be added to their property taxes. 

 

2.         City Council direct that the Corporate Security Unit be the corporate body responsible for protecting City divisional assets and setting the security standards for City-owned or operated facilities/properties.

 

3.         City Council direct that funding for each Division-wide security plan be submitted in future years operating and capital budgets based on operational priorities.

 

4.         City Council direct that budgeting for each Agency, Board, and Commission’s security plan be submitted by the applicable Agency, Board, or Commission in future years operating and capital budgets based on operational priorities.

 

5.         City Council direct Corporate Security to conduct a security review of Agencies, Boards, and Commissions without dedicated security management, such as the Arena Boards, Arts and Heritage Organizations, Toronto Public Library, and Board-run community centres and facilities, to ensure they comply with the Corporate Security framework.

 

6.         City Council request all Agencies, Boards and Commissions with dedicated security management, including Exhibition Place, the Toronto Parking Authority, the Toronto Transit Commission, and the Toronto Zoo to apply the security framework and report to their respective Boards regarding their own security plans in 2009.

 

7.         City Council direct the Corporate Security Unit to coordinate the establishment of a Security Workgroup, comprised of representatives from the Agencies, Boards and Commissions with dedicated security management, for the purpose of guidance on effective implementation of the Corporate Security framework and the enhancement and effectiveness of City-wide security through information sharing.

 

8.         City Council direct the Chief Corporate Officer to provide an annual consolidated report to the Government Management Committee detailing activities and incidents received by Corporate Security.

 

9.         City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to report to the Government Management Committee in June 2009, on:

 

            a.         a comprehensive plan and security measures to protect the Civic Centre Chambers and the second floor of City Hall; and

 

            b.         a review of the security system utilized by the CBC at its building located opposite Metro Hall.

 

10.      City Council request the Chief of Police to review and comment on the report (March 27, 2009) from the City Manager pertaining to the “City Wide Security Plan”, such comments to be addressed in future reports.

 

11.       City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the City-wide Security Plan, including the revised Corporate Security framework, and the Corporate Security Policy as attached (Attachment 1).

 

2.         City Council direct that the Corporate Security Unit be the corporate body responsible for protecting City divisional assets and setting the security standards for City-owned or operated facilities/properties.

 

3.         City Council direct that funding for each Division-wide security plan be submitted in future years operating and capital budgets based on operational priorities.

 

4.         City Council direct that budgeting for each Agency, Board, and Commission’s security plan be submitted by the applicable Agency, Board, or Commission in future years operating and capital budgets based on operational priorities.

 

5.         City Council direct Corporate Security to conduct a security review of Agencies, Boards, and Commissions without dedicated security management, such as the Arena Boards, Arts and Heritage Organizations, Toronto Public Library, and Board-run community centres and facilities, to ensure they comply with the Corporate Security framework.

 

6.         City Council request all Agencies, Boards and Commissions with dedicated security management, including Exhibition Place, the Toronto Parking Authority, the Toronto Transit Commission, and the Toronto Zoo to apply the security framework and report to their respective Boards regarding their own security plans in 2009.

 

7.         City Council direct the Corporate Security Unit to coordinate the establishment of a Security Workgroup, comprised of representatives from the Agencies, Boards and Commissions with dedicated security management, for the purpose of guidance on effective implementation of the Corporate Security framework and the enhancement and effectiveness of City-wide security through information sharing.

 

8.         City Council direct the Chief Corporate Officer to provide an annual consolidated report to the Government Management Committee detailing activities and incidents received by Corporate Security.

 

9.        City Council request the Chief of Police to review and comment on the report (March 27, 2009) from the City Manager pertaining to the “City Wide Security Plan”, such comments to be addressed in future reports.

 

10.       City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Mr. Bruce Bowes, Chief Corporate Officer and Mr. Dwaine Nichol, Manager, Security and Life Safety, gave a presentation to the Government Management Committee regarding a City-Wide Security Plan and filed a copy of their presentation.

Origin
(March 27, 2009) Report from the City Manager
Summary

The City Manager was asked to report on a City‑wide Security Plan prior to the 2008 Operating Budget process. In response to this request, a report titled “City-wide Security Plan”, was submitted to the February 11, 2008 Budget Committee. The report described the Corporate Security framework and the details of the required improvements and enhancements to produce a City-wide Security Plan to be completed and reported to City Council at a later date. This report responds to the amended recommendations included in that February 2008 staff report from the City Manager.

 

This report also provides comparator information on options used by five other major cities in North America as it relates to the role of Corporate Security and Agencies, Boards, and Commissions (ABC’s). Although the configurations of ABC’s varied greatly, staff have provided a profile of which major ABC functions are secured by the Corporate Security Unit of each city directly. With this benchmarking, this report also provides recommendations on the security framework and implementation for the City of Toronto’s ABC’s.

Background Information (Committee)
Report - City-Wide Security Plan
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20216.pdf)

Attachment 1 - GM22-4
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20217.pdf)

Attachment 2 - GM22-4
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20218.pdf)

Attachment 3 - GM22-4
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20219.pdf)

Communications (Committee)
(April 15, 2009) presentation from Dwaine Nichol, Manager, Security and Life Safety, Facilities and Real Estate, Office of the Chief Corporate Officer, City of Toronto (GM.New.GM22.4a)
Communications (City Council)
(January 22, 2008) letter from Councillor Michael Thompson, Scarborough Centre, Ward 37, addressed to the City Clerk (CC.New.GM22.4.1)

GM22.6

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: All 

Request for Authority to Enter into 311 Routing Agreements with Neighbouring Municipalities
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager (Cluster A) to negotiate and enter into agreements with bordering municipalities/regions for 311 routing arrangements as required under the Bell Canada General Tariff, Item 6001 (the “311 Service Tariff”) on such terms as may be satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and the City Solicitor, to address the issues as discussed in this report.

 

2.         City Council authorize the 311 Project Director to:

 

              a.       direct Bell Canada to implement such routing arrangements as may be agreed to; and

              b.       pay any applicable rates and charges under the 311 Service Tariff.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager (Cluster A) to negotiate and enter into agreements with bordering municipalities/regions for 311 routing arrangements as required under the Bell Canada General Tariff, Item 6001 (the “311 Service Tariff”) on such terms as may be satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and the City Solicitor, to address the issues as discussed in this report.

 

2.         City Council authorize the 311 Project Director to:

 

             a.        direct Bell Canada to implement such routing arrangements as may be agreed to; and

             b.        pay any applicable rates and charges under the 311 Service Tariff.

Origin
(March 17, 2009) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Sue Corke
Summary

This report is to request Council approval for the delegation of authority to City staff to enter into agreements with bordering municipalities/regions for 311 routing arrangements as required under the CRTC’s General Tariff, Item 6001 (the “311 Service Tariff”).

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Request for Authority to Enter into 311 Routing Agreements with Neighbouring Municipalities
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20221.pdf)


GM22.10

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: All 

Out-of-Province Parking Ticket Collection Pilot Program
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.                  City Council discontinue the Out-of-Province Parking Ticket Collection pilot program given that the costs to operate the program exceed the revenues being realized.

 

2.                  City Council again request the Province of Ontario to negotiate data transfer and data exchange agreements with other provincial and state governments, so as to provide municipalities with name and address information for out-of-province plate owners who remain on the default parking ticket payment listing;  priority should be given to the provinces of Quebec, Alberta and British Columbia, and the states of New York, Michigan and Florida, which account for more than 50 per cent of all out-of-province tickets issued.

 

3.         City Council request the Acting Treasurer and Councillor McConnell to enter into discussions with the “Big 12” Police Services Board, the Ontario caucus of FCM and Tourism Toronto regarding Out-of-Province Parking Ticket Collections and seek their endorsement of the City’s initiative to negotiate data transfer and data exchange agreements with the Province and other provincial and state governments.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.                  City Council discontinue the Out-of-Province Parking Ticket Collection pilot program given that the costs to operate the program exceed the revenues being realized.

 

2.                  City Council again request the Province of Ontario to negotiate data transfer and data exchange agreements with other provincial and state governments, so as to provide municipalities with name and address information for out-of-province plate owners who remain on the default parking ticket payment listing;  priority should be given to the provinces of Quebec, Alberta and British Columbia, and the states of New York, Michigan and Florida, which account for more than 50 per cent of all out-of-province tickets issued.

 

3.         City Council request the Acting Treasurer and Councillor McConnell to enter into discussions with the “Big 12” Police Services Board, the Ontario caucus of FCM and Tourism Toronto regarding Out-of-Province Parking Ticket Collections and seek their endorsement of the City’s initiative to negotiate data transfer and data exchange agreements with the Province and other provincial and state governments.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee requested the Acting Treasurer to report to the Government Management Committee meeting of November 9, 2009, outlining the feasibility of not ticketing Out-of-Province vehicles for parking violations and include the cost benefits and financial implications of providing a notice to these drivers that would advise them that they are parked illegally, and further, provide the practices of other municipalities when dealing with this issue.

Origin
(March 25, 2009) Report from the Acting Treasurer
Summary

This report presents the evaluation results of the Out-of-Province Parking Ticket Collection pilot project approved by City Council in July 2006 and launched in December 2007.  An evaluation of the pilot results reveals that the costs to administer the program exceed the revenues realized.  As such it is recommended that the pilot program be discontinued.

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Out-of-Province Parking Ticket Collection Pilot Program
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20228.pdf)


GM22.11

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 26 

Licence Agreement with the Minister of Energy and Infrastructure for the Use of Provincial Lands in Flemingdon Park
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council authorize entering into a licence Agreement (the “Licence”) with the Licensor for non-exclusive use of approximately 33.14 acres of land in Flemingdon Park, (the “Lands”), substantially on the terms and conditions as set out in Appendix “A” and on such other terms and conditions as approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, or his or her designate, and in a form and content acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the License, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize entering into a licence Agreement (the “Licence”) with the Licensor for non-exclusive use of approximately 33.14 acres of land in Flemingdon Park, (the “Lands”), substantially on the terms and conditions as set out in Appendix “A” and on such other terms and conditions as approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, or his or her designate, and in a form and content acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the License, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

Origin
(February 13, 2009) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer
Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to enter into a licence Agreement with Ontario Realty Corporation, acting as agent on behalf of Her Majesty the Queen in right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Energy and Infrastructure (“the Licensor”), for the use of lands in Flemingdon Park for recreational purposes. The proposed License Agreement is for a five (5) year term, commencing retroactively on December 1st, 2007. 

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Licence Agreement with the Minister of Energy and Infrastructure for the Use of Provincial Lands in Flemingdon Park
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20229.pdf)

Appendix A - GM22-11
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20230.pdf)

Appendix B - GM22-11
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20231.pdf)


GM22.12

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 1, 3, 7, 8, 11, 12, 20, 24, 28, 35, 37, 40, 43 

Master Child Care Lease Agreement between City of Toronto and Toronto Community Housing Corporation
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City, as tenant, to enter into sixteen (16) lease renewal agreements with Toronto Community Housing Corporation, as landlord, for the five (5) year renewal term commencing January 1, 2009, substantially on the same terms and conditions set out in the existing leases except that the new rents for each of the childcare locations shall be those set out in Appendix “A” and except that there is no further renewal option, together with such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Chief Corporate Officer and in form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council grant authority for the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the lease renewal agreements including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City, as tenant, to enter into sixteen (16) lease renewal agreements with Toronto Community Housing Corporation, as landlord, for the five (5) year renewal term commencing January 1, 2009, substantially on the same terms and conditions set out in the existing leases except that the new rents for each of the childcare locations shall be those set out in Appendix “A” and except that there is no further renewal option, together with such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Chief Corporate Officer and in form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council grant authority for the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the lease renewal agreements including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

Origin
(March 16, 2009) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer
Summary

The purpose of this Report is to obtain Council’s authority for the City, as tenant, to renew sixteen (16) leases with Toronto Community Housing Corporation, as landlord, for another five (5) year term, commencing January 1, 2009 at new rent rates.

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Master Child Care Lease Agreement between City of Toronto and Toronto Community Housing Corporation
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20232.pdf)

Appendix A - GM22-12
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20233.pdf)


GM22.13

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 34 

1500 Don Mills Road – Lease Amending and Extension Agreement and Designation as a Municipal Capital Facility
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council authorize a Lease Extension and Amending Agreement with El-Ad (1500 Don Mills) Limited (the “Landlord”) for the lease of approximately 34,899 square feet of rentable area on the fourth (4th) and sixth (6th) floors of the building (the “Building”) known municipally as 1500 Don Mills Road (the “Leased Premises”), substantially on the terms and conditions as set out in Appendix “A” attached hereto and on such other terms and conditions as approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, or his or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council authorize the lease of up to approximately 2,500 square feet of additional space in the Building, provided such space can be made available by the Landlord, substantially on the terms and conditions as set out in Appendix “A” attached hereto and on such other terms and conditions as approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, or his delegate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the Lease Agreement, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

4.         City Council pass a by-law pursuant to section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 providing authority to:

 

             a.        enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with El-Ad (1500 Don Mills) Limited in respect of the Leased Premises; and

 

             b.        exempt the Leased Premises from taxation for municipal and school purposes, which tax exemption is to be effective from the latest of (i) the date the municipal capital facility agreement is signed and (ii) the date the tax exemption by-law is enacted.

 

5.         City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the by-law to the Minister of  Education, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District  School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, the Conseil Scolaire  de District du Centre-Sud-Ouest and the Conseil Scolaire de District du  Catholique Centre-Sud.

 

6.         City Council authorize the introduction of the necessary bills to give effect thereto.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize a Lease Extension and Amending Agreement with El-Ad (1500 Don Mills) Limited (the “Landlord”) for the lease of approximately 34,899 square feet of rentable area on the fourth (4th) and sixth (6th) floors of the building (the “Building”) known municipally as 1500 Don Mills Road (the “Leased Premises”), substantially on the terms and conditions as set out in Appendix “A” attached hereto and on such other terms and conditions as approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, or his or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council authorize the lease of up to approximately 2,500 square feet of additional space in the Building, provided such space can be made available by the Landlord, substantially on the terms and conditions as set out in Appendix “A” attached hereto and on such other terms and conditions as approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, or his delegate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the Lease Agreement, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

4.         City Council pass a by-law pursuant to section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 providing authority to:

 

            a.         enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with El-Ad (1500 Don Mills) Limited in respect of the Leased Premises; and

 

            b.         exempt the Leased Premises from taxation for municipal and school purposes, which tax exemption is to be effective from the latest of (i) the date the municipal capital facility agreement is signed and (ii) the date the tax exemption by-law is enacted.

 

5.         City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the by-law to the Minister of  Education, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District  School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, the Conseil Scolaire  de District du Centre-Sud-Ouest and the Conseil Scolaire de District du  Catholique Centre-Sud.

 

6.         City Council authorize the introduction of the necessary bills to give effect thereto.

Origin
(March 16, 2009) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer
Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to enter into a Lease Amending and Extension Agreement with El-Ad (1500 Don Mills) Limited, for the lease of approximately 34,899 square feet of rentable area located on the fourth (4th) and sixth (6th) floors of the building municipally known as 1500 Don Mills Road, and to have the leased premises designated as a Municipal Capital Facility.

Background Information (Committee)
Report - 1500 Don Mills Road - Lease Amending and Extension Agreement and Designation as a Municipal Capital Facility
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20234.pdf)

Appendix A - GM22-13
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20235.pdf)

Appendix B - GM22-13
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20236.pdf)


GM22.14

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 8 

York University Acquisition – Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension (South of Steeles)
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council grant authority for the City to accept an Offer to Sell from York University to sell to the City a portion of the property known municipally as 0 Murray Ross Parkway, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix “A” and Attachment 1 – Confidential Information to this report.

 

2.         City Council authorize severally each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services to execute the Offer To Sell on behalf of the City.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable and necessary.

 

4.         City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information in Attachment 1 upon final settlement and completion of all property transactions and claims related to the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, or commencement of revenue service of the Project.

 

Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (March 25, 2009) from the Chief Corporate Officer

remains confidential at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the

City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains information related to a proposed or pending

acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes. The confidential information

contained in Confidential Attachment 1 will be made public upon final settlement and completion of all property transactions and claims related to the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, or commencement of revenue service of the Project.

————
Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority for the City to accept an Offer to Sell from York University to sell to the City a portion of the property known municipally as 0 Murray Ross Parkway, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix “A” and Attachment 1 – Confidential Information to this report.

 

2.         City Council authorize severally each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services to execute the Offer To Sell on behalf of the City.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable and necessary.

 

4.         City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information in Attachment 1 upon final settlement and completion of all property transactions and claims related to the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, or commencement of revenue service of the Project.

Origin
(March 25, 2009) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer
Summary

This report seeks authority for the City to acquire a portion of vacant land located at the southwest corner of Murray Ross Parkway and Keele Street (the “Property”), from York University to relocate Firehall 141 (“Fire hall”) on the Property, from its current location of 3965 Keele St. This relocation is a necessary prerequisite in order to permit construction of the Finch West Station, which forms part of the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project (the “Project").York University has signed an irrevocable Offer to Sell the property to the City.    

Background Information (Committee)
Report - York University Acquisition - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension (South of Steeles)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20237.pdf)

Appendix A - GM22-14
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20238.pdf)

Confidential 1 - GM22-14
Site Map - GM22-14
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20240.pdf)


GM22.15

 

Adopted 

 

Ward: All 

Procurement of Used Vehicles and Equipment
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Director of Fleet Services to purchase used vehicles and equipment through auction, liquidation sales or trade publications advertisements, not to exceed the approved Fleet Services’ capital budget.

 

2          City Council direct the Director of Fleet Services to report annually on the purchase of used vehicles and equipment as part of the year-end capital variance reporting.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Director of Fleet Services to purchase used vehicles and equipment through auction, liquidation sales or trade publications advertisements, not to exceed the approved Fleet Services’ capital budget.

 

2          City Council direct the Director of Fleet Services to report annually on the purchase of used vehicles and equipment as part of the year-end capital variance reporting.

Origin
(March 18, 2009) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer
Summary

Fleet Services is seeking Council authority to purchase used vehicles and equipment through auction, liquidation sales or trade publications advertisements as a cost savings measure. 

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Procurement of Used Vehicles and Equipment
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20241.pdf)

Speakers (Committee)

Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ward 34, Don Valley East


GM22.16

 

Amended 

 

Ward: All 

Green Fleet Plan 2008 - 2011 – Annual Update (2008)
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council direct Fleet Services to expand the use of the idle shut-down device and idle device alarms on 40 light-duty vehicles used by managers and supervisors in Parks Forestry and Recreation, Solid Waste Management Services, Transportation Services and Toronto Water, to be funded from the Green Fleet Fund.

 

2.         City Council direct Fleet Services to provide a report on the outcome of the expanded idle shut-down pilot as part of the next Green Fleet Plan Annual Update in 2010, and as part of  the shut-down pilot, staff test a 10-second shut down interval on some of the vehicles.

 

3.         City Council direct Fleet Services to investigate, consult and implement an Idle-Free decal similar to the City of Victoria.

 

4.         City Council request Fleet Services, in coordination with the Medical Officer of Health, to consider implementation of a similar approach to that of the City of Victoria’s anti-idling decals which engages City staff in ending idling of City vehicles and promotes anti-idling among the public.

 

5.         City Council approve the “Green Fleet Expo”, “GFX” and associated logo as City of Toronto marks and that staff from Legal Services Division prepare an application to the Federal Registrar of Trade-Marks for registration of these marks.

 

6.         City Council receive for information the Attached Appendix A: Status Summary for the Green Fleet Plan 2008 – 2011.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct Fleet Services to expand the use of the idle shut-down device on 40 light-duty vehicles used by managers and supervisors in Parks Forestry and Recreation, Solid Waste Management Services, Transportation Services and Toronto Water to be funded from the Green Fleet Fund.

 

2.         City Council direct Fleet Services to provide a report on the outcome of the expanded idle shut-down pilot as part of the next Green Fleet Plan Annual Update in 2010.

 

3.         City Council direct Fleet Services not to proceed with the installation of a flashing light/buzzer approach to reduce idling.

 

4.         City Council approve the “Green Fleet Expo”, “GFX” and associated logo as City of Toronto marks and that staff from Legal Services Division prepare an application to the Federal Registrar of Trade-Marks for registration of these marks.

 

5.         City Council receive for information the Attached Appendix A: Status Summary for the Green Fleet Plan 2008 – 2011.

Origin
(March 27, 2009) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer
Summary

This report provides the first annual update on the Green Fleet Plan 2008-2011, adopted by Council in March 2008.  As of December 2008, three of the measurable targets in the Green Fleet Plan have been achieved. Targets met include adding 117 green vehicles to the fleet exceeding the target of 80.  Greenhouse gases (GHGs) were reduced by 3,340 tonnes in 2008 compared to the target of 3,280 tonnes.  Forecasted out to 2011, the Green Fleet Plans will reduce GHGs by 20,392 tonnes and easily meet the Kyoto/City target of a 40,420 tonne baseline for 2012 based on a 6% reduction over 1990 levels.  Lastly, implementing the Green Fleet Plan in 2008 resulted in savings of approximately $451,674 compared to the target of $417,000 due mainly to fuel cost savings from green vehicles and biodiesel.  More information on each of the actions listed in the Green Fleet Plan as well as additional reporting requirements is included in Appendix A.

 

Fleet Services continues to promote the Idle Free program for staff.  The four components to Idle Free are operator education, engine computer programming, idle shut down devices and other devices such as cab heaters.  

 

In 2008, Fleet Services trialed two after-market devices that could be installed on existing vehicles to shut down based on prescribed idle time intervals and/or ambient temperature.

One anti-idling device performed as expected and is being recommended for a larger trial of 40 units.

 

The successful Green Fleet Expo (GFX) name and logo is being recommended for adoption as official marks of the City of Toronto such that they can be trade-mark protected.

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Green Fleet Plan 2008 - 2011 - Annual Update (2008)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20243.pdf)

Appendix A - GM22-16
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20244.pdf)

Appendix B - GM22-16
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20245.pdf)


GM22.17

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 27 

Contract Award - Tender Call 192-2008 for Old City Hall, 60 Queen Street West, HVAC and Electrical Upgrade
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to award Tender Call 192-2008, for the HVAC and Electrical Upgrade at the Old City Hall to Atlas Corporation Inc., being the lowest bid meeting specifications in conformance with the quotation requirements, in two (2) separate Purchase Orders:

a.         the first Purchase Order in the amount of $21,061,550.00 net of GST will be issued in year 2009 under existing Council approval of the 2009-2014 Budget Capital Plan; and

 

b.         the second Purchase Order in the amount of $11,638,450.00 net of GST will be issued in future year following Council budget approval in the 2010-2015 Capital Budget Cycle for a total potential award amount of $32,700,000.00 net of GST.

 

2.         City Council forward Recommendation 1.b. to the Budget Committee for consideration.          

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to award Tender Call 192-2008, for the HVAC and Electrical Upgrade at the Old City Hall to Atlas Corporation Inc., being the lowest bid meeting specifications in conformance with the quotation requirements, in two (2) separate Purchase Orders:

a.         the first Purchase Order in the amount of $21,061,550.00 net of GST will be issued in year 2009 under existing Council approval of the 2009-2014 Budget Capital Plan; and

b.         the second Purchase Order in the amount of $11,638,450.00 net of GST will be issued in future year following Council budget approval in the 2010-2015 Capital Budget Cycle for a total potential award amount of $32,700,000.00 net of GST.

 

2.         City Council forward Recommendation 1.b. to the Budget Committee for consideration.     

Origin
(March 23, 2009) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division
Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the results of the Tender Call 192-2008 issued for the HVAC and Electrical Upgrade at the Old City Hall and to request authority to award a contract to the recommended bidder.

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Contract Award - Tender Call 192-2008 for Old City Hall, 60 Queen Street West, HVAC and Electrical Upgrade
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20246.pdf)


GM22.18

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 7 

Agreement with Toronto Catholic District School Board for Tiny Tots Program at Venerable John Merlini Catholic School
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to enter into a ten-month License Agreement with the Toronto Catholic District School Board for the shared use of a portion of Venerable John Merlini Catholic School, to be automatically renewed every year until terminated by either party, commencing on September 1, 2008, at a fee to be offset through the Exchange of Services Agreement or as set out in this report, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council authorize the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to approve amendments to the Licence Agreement as and when required to allow for changes  in the hours, size, location or scope of use of the licensed area.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to enter into a ten-month License Agreement with the Toronto Catholic District School Board for the shared use of a portion of Venerable John Merlini Catholic School, to be automatically renewed every year until terminated by either party, commencing on September 1, 2008, at a fee to be offset through the Exchange of Services Agreement or as set out in this report, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council authorize the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to approve amendments to the Licence Agreement as and when required to allow for changes  in the hours, size, location or scope of use of the licensed area.

Origin
(April 2, 2009) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation
Summary

The purpose of this report is to request City Council authority to negotiate and enter into a license agreement with the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) for the shared use of a portion of school space at Venerable John Merlini Catholic School located at 123 Whitfield Avenue in Ward 1, for a term of ten months, from September 1, 2008 to June 30, 2009, which term shall automatically renew every year until terminated by either party upon providing to the other at least thirty (30) days’ notice prior to the last day of any ten-month term.

 

License fees and any additional fees for the use of the school space will be offset through the Exchange of Services Agreement approved by City Council on October 29, 2008. In the event that the Exchange of Services Agreement expires, is terminated, or otherwise ceases to be in effect, the City will be required to pay $500 per year in license fees which also includes consumables and which will be absorbed through the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division’s current budget.

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Agreement with Toronto Catholic District School Board for Tiny Tots Program at Venerable John Merlini Catholic School
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20247.pdf)


GM22.19

 

Adopted on Consent

 

Ward: 20 

Grange Park Revitalization
City Council Decision

City Council on April 29 and 30, 2009, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to negotiate and execute an amendment to the current 1911 Grange Park agreement between the City and the Art Gallery of Ontario for the fundraising, design, construction and enhanced maintenance of the park, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and such agreement be on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager and the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council direct that the new amendment to the 1911 agreement provide that the Grange Park Neighbourhood be involved on an on-going basis with park management and operations to ensure that future management of Grange Park is community based.

————
Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to negotiate and execute an amendment to the current 1911 Grange Park agreement between the City and the Art Gallery of Ontario for the fundraising, design, construction and enhanced maintenance of the park, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and such agreement be on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager and the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council direct that the new amendment to the 1911 agreement provide that the Grange Park Neighbourhood be involved on an on-going basis with park management and operations to ensure that future management of Grange Park is community based.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee received the communication (April 8, 2009) from Ralph J. Daley, President, Grange Community Association.

Origin
(April 9, 2009) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation
Summary

This report seeks Council authority to negotiate an amendment to the 1911 agreement between the City and the Art Gallery of Ontario (AGO) for park improvements to create a restored and revitalized Grange Park.

 

 

Background Information (Committee)
Report - Grange Park Revitalization
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2009/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-20248.pdf)

Communications (Committee)
(April 8, 2009) e-mail from Ralph J. Daley, President, Grange Community Association (GM.New.GM22.19.1)
Speakers (Committee)

Councillor Adam Vaughan


Submitted Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby, Chair, Government Management Committee